This note provides information on the extent of path provision in Scotland and highlights deficiencies in current provision.

Similar documents
CYCLING SCOTLAND SCOTTISH CHARITY NO.SCO Annual Cycling Monitoring Report

Transport Poverty in Scotland. August 2016

Transport Poverty in Scotland. August 2016

Attitudes to Gaelic Broadcasting a briefing for MG ALBA June 2013 Lindsay Paterson & Fiona O Hanlon 1

Introduction. Strategic Objectives: Facilities Strategy from 2017 Introduction. Facilities Strategy from Introduction

CYCLING SCOTLAND SCOTTISH CHARITY NO.SCO Annual Cycling Monitoring Report. CAPS Action 18

Welsh Government Consultation Document Taking Forward Wales Sustainable Management of Natural Resources.

NATIONAL AUDIT OF SCOTLAND S GOLF COURSES AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES

Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore

Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

A Profile of Curling in Scotland

CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY FOR DECISION

Evaluation of Scottish Rugby s Phase 3 CashBack for Communities-funded activities

Attitudes to greenspace in Scotland. a review of key trends between 2004 and 2013

Callander Mountain Bike Trails Feasibility Study Executive Summary January 2015

Smarter Choices, Smarter Places

Proportion of substandard bridges

Scottish Hyperbaric Medical Service Strategic Context and Overview

20mph in Edinburgh. Phil Noble

COUNT ME IN PEDESTRIAN COUNTERS CASE STUDY ABOUT THIS CASE STUDY:

Agenda 8. Active Travel progress update. Committee. Strategy and Programmes. Date of meeting 13 June 2014 Date of report 20 May 2014

Promoting Cycle Tourism

SCOTTISH CYCLING FACILITIES STRATEGY

Right to roam and/or purpose build mountain bike trails?

NCN 78 Benderloch to Ledaig Summary

Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy & Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans

DEFRA RIGHTS OF WAY IMPROVEMENT PLANS OF THE FUTURE

Warfield Neighbourhood Plan: 4.4 Infrastructure

PATHWAYS DEVELOPMENT The Plan Pathways to Opportunities

RESULTS OF SPRING 2017 SQUIRREL SURVEYS

ADVICE ON Finding places to ride and carriage drive

interchange audit ABERDEEN Introduction Purpose of the Interchange Audit Interchange Audit Linking cycling with public transport

Off Road Riding in Scotland Expectations Vs Reality The Equestrian Perspective. Helene Mauchlen National Manager BHS Scotland

The Legal Record of Rights of Way

An introduction to the benefits of - a we developed monitoring process. Cycling Without Borders Conference. 19 th September 2014

GRISI PLUS Networking Seminar. WRA - Synopsis of Good Practices from an International Perspective

Canada s Capital Region Delegation to the Velo-City Global 2010 Conference

September HAWKHURST PARISH COUNCIL Page 1 of 13 SPORTS STRATEGY FINAL

Glasgow 2018 European Championships. Perthshire Tourism Partnership 7 February 2018

Creating a path network - a guide to local action

Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea

This objective implies that all population groups should find walking appealing, and that it is made easier for them to walk more on a daily basis.

Matt Mallinder, Cycling UK Dick Vincent, National Towpath Ranger. Living waterways transform places and enrich lives

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Argyll Marine Special Areas of Conservation

Active travel and economic performance: A What Works review of evidence from cycling and walking schemes

Appendix 13 Rowing and sculling in the sea

By Maria Strandberg & Bruno Hedlund, STERF

Appendix 16 Yacht racing at sea

Hooked On Scotland READ ONLINE

NCN 78 Dalnatrat to Duror Summary

connectivity through walking and cycling

July 2016 JD No 6 Post No 6 JOB DESCRIPTION

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat

TERM CONTRACT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCOTTISH TRUNK ROAD NETWORK NORTH EAST UNIT

Deer Management in Scotland: Report to the Scottish Government from Scottish Natural Heritage 2016

FOOTWAY PARKING AND DOUBLE PARKING (SCOTLAND) BILL

Sustrans Scotland: walking and cycling outcomes

Canal by Bike Feasibility Study. Final Report

Community Links. Cycling and walking projects for Scotland

Effectiveness of Local Biodiversity Action Plans to Identify Locally Rare and Endangered Fish in Scotland

Active Travel Towns Funding Scheme Project Proposal. Sligo. Sligo Local Authorities

RESPONSE from SPOKES to NPF3 Main Issues Report to: July 2013

Gaelic Language Plan Second Iteration

RESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL. 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving the aims of the Bill?

CONTENTS PREFACE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 2.0 POLICY AND GOVERNANCE 3.0 SUMMARY OF PROGRESS 4.0 NATURE OF DEMAND 5.0 TRAVEL AND PARKING INITIATIVES

Coast And Castles Cycle Route (National Cycle Network Route)

The Value of Cycle Tourism

How much do you know about Scottish castles? TAKE THIS QUIZ AND FIND OUT! COMPLETE THE SENTENCES WITH THE PASSIVE FORMS OF THE VERBS IN BRACKETS.

Ramblers Cymru response to Welsh Government Green Paper on Improving opportunities to access the outdoors for responsible recreation

DOE Climate Change Proposals

Delivering the. Strategy 7.0

SPORT NORTHERN IRELAND

ABERDEEN: CITY OF THE FUTURE

Equestrian Access and The British Horse Society

CONTEXT FOR TODAY. Sport and Active Legacy from 2014 Commonwealth Games

NETBALL SCOTLAND ANNUAL REPORT 20141

Operational Policy. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service. Mountain biking in QPWS managed areas. Visitor Management. 1 Purpose

2015 SCOTTISH CHAMPION OF CHAMPIONS

BRIEFING PAPER 29 FINDINGS SERIES. Children s travel to school are we moving in the right direction?

The boards contain our dra Vision & Objec ves for Danbury.

The Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy; and 20mph speed limits

21/02/2018. How Far is it Acceptable to Walk? Introduction. How Far is it Acceptable to Walk?

3 FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF LAKE-TO-LAKE CYCLING ROUTE

Road Safety in Sweden and the Effect of Speed on Safety

Scottish Cycling Facilities Strategy

Sustainable Fisheries for Future Generations The Fisheries White Paper

Scotland Case Studies

THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF MOUNTAIN BIKING IN SCOTLAND. A National Strategic Framework Refresh

Norfolk Access Improvement Plan (NAIP)

20mph. We want to make Edinburgh a better and safer place to live, work and play.

An Camas Mor. Future Railway & Bus Station. An Camas Mor. Countryside Park. Application site boundary. Village area

Bulwell Cycling Consultation

The Spey Catchment Initiative

The Scottish Open Water Swimming Association

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 9 Public Rights of Way

Cycle Routes. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 3/95 March Introduction. Implementation. Project aims. Design

City of Perth Cycle Plan 2029

TRCP National Sportsmen s Survey Online/phone survey of 1,000 hunters and anglers throughout the United States

Part B Design Guidance / Principles _

Transcription:

THE PROVISION OF PATHS IN SCOTLAND This note provides information on the extent of path provision in Scotland and highlights deficiencies in current provision. Why are paths important? Paths are important because they can provide: access to local countryside and more remote areas on foot, bike or horse; opportunities for long-distance travelling; safe, non-motorised access to shops, work and school; opportunities to integrate access and land management. The use made of paths can help to improve people s health, reduce social exclusion and provide an inexpensive way of getting from place to place. Good quality paths also help visitors to Scotland to enjoy the outdoors and to visit places of landscape, historical and wildlife interest, thus encouraging them to spend money locally and support the rural economy. Well planned paths also help landowners and farmers to integrate recreational use with land management operations without compromising their businesses. How many paths are there? There is no accepted national figure for the overall length of existing paths and tracks in Scotland. There are two studies (Peter Scott Planning Services 1994, Land Use Consultants 2001), based on detailed surveys in small study areas, which can be used to roughly estimate the current length of paths and tracks that might exist. These studies indicate that more than 50,000km of paths and tracks may exist in Scotland, though a significant proportion of these about 47% - are likely to be farm & forest tracks. Of the estimated 50,000km of paths and tracks, about 15,000km are recorded as rights of way (there are just under 7,000 recorded rights of way in Scotland). However, 84% of these routes are claimed rights of way, in that they appear to meet the common law conditions to confirm a right of way but have not been asserted, so their status is uncertain and unclear. Appendix 1 provides a detailed breakdown of rights of way provision in each local authority area (also see the SPICe Note on Rights of Way). Thus, of the 50,000km or so of paths and tracks it is estimated that only around 3,230km provide assured access, with recognised rights of way (i.e. those vindicated or asserted) and paths secured by agreements accounting for 1840km and 1,390km respectively. Within this, official long distance routes the West Highland Way, Southern Upland Way and Speyside Way account for 560km (Scottish Natural Heritage 1997). Scottish Natural Heritage, in liaison with local authorities, is developing a Scottish Paths Record. This will provide a more accurate baseline of the overall length and distribution of paths in Scotland. It will also serve as an important tool for planning

and monitoring the delivery of improved path provision in Scotland, and underpin the expected new work on core paths and core path networks provided for in the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. The Scottish Paths Record should be completed in the second half of 2002. How does this provision compare with elsewhere? Based on an estimated length of 50,000km of paths in Scotland, the average density of paths in Scotland is about 0.63km per square km. Assured access along recognised rights of way and paths secured by agreements amounts to only 0.04km per square km. Even if claimed rights of way are included, this figure increases only to 0.19km per square km. These figures compare unfavourably with England and Wales. In these two countries, the density of legally defined and assured rights of way are 1.3km and 1.8km per square km respectively. The total density of paths in England and Wales will be considerably higher than this if all farm and forest tracks are included. In England, some 37,000km of rights of way (23% of the total) are known to be legally available for cycling and horseriding; In Wales, some 7,700km (20% of the total) are known to be legally available for cycling and horseriding. By comparison, only 800km (about 5% of the total) of rights of way in Scotland are recorded as providing access for cycling and horse riding. The number of assured routes in Scotland also compares poorly with some other European countries. For example, in the German Lander of Baden-Wurttemburg, which has a land area half the size of Scotland, there are 45,000km of waymarked walking routes. In Norway there are 18,000km of summer hiking routes and 5,000km of ski trails. In Sweden there are 15,000km of maintained and waymarked walking routes and also 15,000km of cycleways. Denmark has 2,400km of long-distance paths in addition to signed farm and forest tracks and extensive cycle networks (Peter Scott Planning Services 1998). Thus the total provision of paths in Scotland is relatively poor compared to other European countries, and the provision of legally assured routes and provision for cycling and horseriding in Scotland is extremely poor. Where are the paths? Overall, the distribution of low ground path provision is patchy throughout Scotland (Appendix 1 provides a breakdown by local authority area for rights of way). Many local authorities in central Scotland, such as East Dunbartonshire, South Lanarkshire, North Lanarkshire, East Renfrewshire, Renfrewshire and West Lothian, have low densities of rights of way given the size of their population. Some local authorities, such as Dumfries & Galloway, Highland and Scottish Borders, have relatively high densities of rights of way in relation to their population but these are often well away from towns and cities. Overall, what information exists suggests that the provision of paths, particularly of those where access can be legally assured, is poorest close to where people live, particularly in central Scotland.

Recent years have seen growing efforts by many local authorities to provide local path networks, partly in response to SNH s Paths for All initiative, and to prepare access strategies and establish local access forums. Implementation of path networks on the ground, however, has been slower than it could have been due to lack of staff time and funding, lack of co-operation from some land managers, and the constraints of the existing legal system. The same difficulties result in longdistance routes taking many years to implement. What sort of path provision do people want? Research findings (System Three Scotland 1996) strongly suggest that the majority of people wishing to access the countryside are seeking well signposted, well managed and welcoming paths. A study, which investigated the concerns that people have about walking in the countryside, found that 52% of the public were concerned about knowing where they could go in the countryside (System Three Scotland 1991). Consultation responses indicate the need for more routes for cyclists, horseriders and for people with disabilities, and for better quality provision, including better signposting, improved path maintenance and better surfaces for multiple use (Scott Porter Research and Marketing 1998). Conclusion The overall path resource in Scotland has significant potential to contribute to the development of meaningful path networks for local people and visitors. In general, while examples of good path provision exist and are increasing, the distribution and quality of low ground paths is patchy and often poor, so there is a need for more and better paths, particularly around and within settlements. This provision will then help to generate a wide range of social, health, economic and environmental benefits. Contact points Ron McCraw (tel. 0131 446 2416, email: ron.mccraw@snh.gov.uk) Richard Davison (tel. 0131 446 2467, email: richard.davison@snh.gov.uk)

Bibliography Land Use Consultants 2001. Local Authority Pilot Projects: Final Report. Unpublished report. Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh. Scottish Rights of Way Society in partnership with Scottish Natural Heritage 2000. Mapping and recording the Rights of Way of Scotland project. SNH Research, Survey & Monitoring Report No 130, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh. Peter Scott Planning Services 1998. Access to the Countryside in Selected European countries: a review of access rights, legislation and associated arrangements in Denmark, Germany, Norway and Sweden. SNH Research, Survey and Monitoring Report No110, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh. Peter Scott Planning Services 1994. Footpaths and access in the Scottish countryside. SNH Research, Survey and Monitoring Report No 2, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh. Scott Porter Research & Marketing Ltd 1998. Access consultation: analysis of responses. SNH Research, Survey and Monitoring Report No 134, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh. Scottish Natural Heritage 1997. Long-distance Routes in Scotland, SNH Policy Paper, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh. System Three Scotland 1991. A survey of public attitudes to walking and access. SNH Research, Survey and Monitoring Report No 4, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh. System Three Scotland 1996. Walking in the countryside in Scotland. SNH Research, Survey and Monitoring Report No 11, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh.

Appendix 1. Rights of way in each local authority Local authority Number of rights of way Total length of rights of way (km) Density of rights of way per local authority population (km/1000 people) Density of rights of way per local authority area (km /square km) Aberdeenshire 441 949.05 4.18 0.15 Angus 66 225.96 2.07 0.10 Argyll & Bute 202 678.88 7.65 0.10 City of Aberdeen 25 48.43 0.23 0.26 City of Dundee 7 4.85 0.03 0.08 City of Glasgow 22 26.30 0.04 0.15 Clackmannanshire 51 78.30 1.62 0.49 Dumfries & Galloway 641 1,793.15 12.30 0.28 East Ayrshire 213 386.53 3.20 0.30 East Dunbartonshire 97 87.45 0.79 0.50 East Lothian 225 316.79 3.47 0.46 East Renfrewshire 60 57.75 0.64 0.33 Edinburgh 132 171.46 0.38 0.65 Eilean Siar 19 81.20 2.99 0.03 Falkirk 182 269.12 1.86 0.90 Fife 1,257 1,317.38 3.76 0.99 Highland 539 3,334.08 15.98 0.13 Inverclyde 20 41.20 0.49 0.25 Midlothian 174 250.36 3.05 0.70 Moray 112 310.08 3.65 0.14 North Ayrshire 56 170.75 1.23 0.19 North Lanarkshire 184 216.23 0.66 0.46 Orkney 138 144.50 7.42 0.14 Perth & Kinross 386 934.79 7.00 0.17 Renfrewshire 51 41.90 0.24 0.16 Scottish Borders 757 1,866.70 17.46 0.39 South Ayrshire 36 93.60 0.82 0.08 South Lanarkshire 307 462.29 1.50 0.26 Stirling 310 470.45 5.52 0.21 West Dunbartonshire 58 77.69 0.82 0.44 West Lothian 187 245.74 1.57 0.57 Scottish Total 6,955 15,152.97 2.96 0.19 (GROS mid 2000 population estimates) (Scottish environment statistics, 1998) Source of information on rights of way is the Catalogue of Rights of Way (see Scottish Rights of Way Society in partnership with SNH, 2000). No rights of way are recorded in Shetland.