New in the MUTCD: The Flashing Yellow Arrow Presented at the 57 th Annual Traffic and Safety Conference May 17, 2006

Similar documents
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF TWO ALLOWABLE PERMISSIVE LEFT-TURN INDICATIONS

FINAL REPORT. Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies

Driving Simulators for Evaluation of Novel Traffic-Control Devices

DRIVER STUDY USING DRIVING SIMULATOR TECHNOLOGY (CONFIRMATION STUDY) Working Paper 7

Driver Behavior in the Presence of Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections Operating the Flashing Yellow Arrow

Flashing Yellow Arrows (A different left turn option) ASCE Meeting June 9, 2015 Kerry C. NeSmith, PE Deputy State Maintenance Engineer

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY CONFERENCE October 18, 2017 FLASHING YELLOW ARROWS

Flashing Yellow Left Turn Arrows Scottsdale s Experience

PENNSYLVANIA IMPLEMENTATION OF FLASHING YELLOW ARROW

Safety and Operations Guidance for Using Timeof-Day Protected-Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Using Flashing Yellow Arrows

Development of Left-Turn Operations Guidelines at Signalized Intersections

Abstract. Background. protected/permissive operation. Source: Google Streetview, Fairview/Orchard intersection

City of Bellevue s Adaptive Left Turn Phasing. Presented by : Mark Poch, PE, PTOE City of Bellevue, WA

Improved Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections Operating the Flashing Yellow Arrow

2016 THE Short Course

DRIVER COMPREHENSION AND OPERATIONS EVALUATION OF FLASHING YELLOW ARROWS

Flashing Yellow Left Turn Arrows: Scottsdale Experience

Going Green by Flashing Yellow

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. Revision to Publication 149, Chapter 20 (Criteria for the Design of Traffic Signal Supports) - March 2009 Edition

STATIC AND DYNAMIC EVALUATION OF THE DRIVER SPEED PERCEPTION AND SELECTION PROCESS

Washington St. Corridor Study

INTRODUCTION TO SIGNAL TIMING & TRAFFIC CONTROL

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal

Pedestrian Timing Strategies at Large Signalized Intersections

Flashing Yellow Arrow Left-Turn Signal Guidelines

Yellow and Red Intervals It s Just a Matter of Time. 58 th Annual Alabama Transportation Conference February 9, 2015

Lane Reduction Signs for Work Zones

Dynamic Change of Left Turn Phase Sequence between Time-Of- Day Patterns Operational and Safety Impacts Abstract

An Analysis of Reducing Pedestrian-Walking-Speed Impacts on Intersection Traffic MOEs

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION SOLUTIONS. Jay Bockisch, PE, PTOE Senior Associate

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

Chapter 5 5. INTERSECTIONS 5.1. INTRODUCTION

Using SHRP 2 s NDS Video Data to Evaluate the Impact of Offset Left-Turn Lanes on Gap Acceptance Behavior Karin M. Bauer & Jessica M.

Chapter 28. Traffic Signs Overview Requirements

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STATISTICS

Designing a Traffic Circle By David Bosworth For MATH 714

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Strategies to Re capture Lost Arterial Traffic Carrying Capacities

Roundabouts The Virginia Experience

Traffic Control Devices Pooled Fund Study

Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

2004 NC Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

PBIC Crash Types Series Left-Turn Crashes Involving Pedestrians

Traffic Signal Design

JCE 4600 Transportation Engineering. Traffic Control

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL 2010: NEW SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION METHODOLOGY. James A. Bonneson, Ph.D., P.E.

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Bicycle Technical Committee and Signals Technical Committee. Recommendation Bicycle Signal Faces

Significant Changes to California's Yellow Signal Timing Protocols

Flashing Yellow Arrow Experience

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Case for Roundabouts:

Comparison of the Green Arrow and the Circular Green for Turn Prohibition to Reduce Wrong-Way Movements at Interchange Terminals

Public Opinion, Traffic Performance, the Environment, and Safety After Construction of Double-Lane Roundabouts

Module 3 Developing Timing Plans for Efficient Intersection Operations During Moderate Traffic Volume Conditions

Turn Lane Warrants: Concepts, Standards, Application in Review

EFFICIENCY OF TRIPLE LEFT-TURN LANES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

CRASH DATA ANALYSIS REPORT. Working Paper 6

Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council

CHAPTER 5 LITERATURE REVIEW

By Kay Fitzpatrick, Ph.D., P.E., Ann Do, P.E., and Bruce Friedman, P.E.

Driver Response to Phase Termination at Signalized Intersections at Signalized Intersections: Are Driving Simulator Results Valid?

TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND OPERATIONS AT SIGNALIZED DIAMOND INTERCHANGES IN NEVADA

Safety Evaluation at Innovative Geometric Designs Gilbert Chlewicki, PE Advanced Transportation Solutions

Simulation Analysis of Intersection Treatments for Cycle Tracks

1982 by Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: ISBN:

PERFORMANCE OF THE ADVANCE WARNING FOR END OF GREEN SYSTEM (AWEGS) FOR HIGH SPEED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Published: August 2009

Introduction to Traffic Signal Timing

Traffic circles. February 9, 2009

Roundabouts A Case Study and Brief Overview

Memorandum MAR or in part.

Driver Understanding of the Flashing Yellow Arrow and Dynamic No Turn on Red Sign for Right Turn Applications

FHWA Safety Performance for Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) Tool

Evaluation of LED-Outlined Backplates at Intersections With Light Rail Lines In Houston, Texas

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

Real Time Bicycle Simulation Study of Bicyclists Behaviors and their Implication on Safety

DPS 201 RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts. Presentation to the Howard-Suamico School Board November 26, 2007

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

EFFECT OF RED LIGHT CAMERAS on INJURY CRASHES in the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

MUTCD (HAWK) 2016 & Adapting the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) to Facilitate Bicycle Use. ITE-IMSA March, 2014

S 0659 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Form DOT F (8-72) Technical Report Documentation Page. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-11/

Title Option One. Operations and Safety of Separated Bicycle Facilities at Single Lane Roundabouts

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS 9. SYSTEM CONTROL 3. DATA COLLECTION 4. SIGNAL PHASING 10. SPECIAL OPERATIONS

Evaluating Roundabout Capacity, Level of Service and Performance

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Transcription:

New in the MUTCD: The Flashing Yellow Arrow Presented at the 57 th Annual Traffic and Safety Conference May 17, 2006 David A. Noyce, Ph.D., P.E. University of Wisconsin - Madison

The FYA Story Research started in early 1990 s My goal today is to tell you a 12 year story in 25 minutes or less And, I m going to violate the first rule of presenting a good story I m going to show you the last page first!

FYA Display Alternatives

The FYA Story Now, the rest of the story

PPLT Control Protected/Permissive Left-Turn (PPLT) Phasing Developed to increase operational efficiency Exclusive phase for left-turns Permissive phase for left-turns All within the same signal cycle Increase capacity / reduce delay

MUTCD Displays Separate traffic signal PPLT Displays 5-sections Green arrow protected indication Circular green permissive indication For shared displays Simultaneous through indication

Problems? Some traffic engineers think the circular green permissive indication is problematic Dual meaning At least 4 variations of the permissive indication have been implemented Wide array of display arrangements and supplemental signs

Geographic Location of Unique PPLT Indications

Variety of PPLT Displays Delaware Michigan Washington Maryland Seattle, WA Cupertino, CA Reno, NV Sparks, NV

Driver confusion?

Driver Confusion!

Project Objective Project objective: to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of different signal displays used with PPLT control Determine PPLT usage in the U.S. Evaluate safety and operational effects Evaluate drivers understanding of various PPLT display arrangements and indications Evaluate field implementations of selected display(s)

Research Objective Evaluate driver comprehension of selected PPLT signal displays using a driving simulator Evaluate driver behavior analysis utilizing data from both dynamic and static evaluation instruments

Agency Survey Objective - Determine the extent of PPLT signal display usage in the United States 107,219 intersections analyzed 30,870 intersections with PPLT signal phasing Intersections Without PPLT 71% PPLT Intersections 29 %

Predominant PPLT Signal Display 5-SECTION CLUSTER 5-SECTION VERTICAL 4-SECTION VERTICAL 3-SECTION VERTICAL 5-SECTION HORIZONTAL

Photographic Driver Study 2,465 drivers 73,950 scenarios 58% male - 41% female Driver s age 27% < 24 44% 24 to 44 21% 45 to 65 7% > 65

Permissive Indications Percent Correct Response 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 70.5 85.8 75.2 63.8 55.6 40 Green Ball Flashing Yellow Ball Flashing Yellow Arrow Flashing Red Ball Flashing Red Arrow Permitted Indication

Driving Simulator

Signal Displays Scenario a Description Lens Color and Left-Turn Indication b Arrangement Protected Mode Permitted Mode 1,2 GB 5-section cluster 3,4 FYA 5-section cluster 5,6 GB/FYA Sparks 5-section cluster

Signal Displays Scenario a Description Lens Color and Arrangement Protected Mode Left-Turn Indication b Permitted Mode 7,8 FYA 4-section vertical or or or 9,10 GB 5-section vertical 11,12 FYA 5-section vertical R = RED Y = YELLOW G = GREEN Y = FLASHING YELLOW

Alternative Display Goals Display Performance Goals Clearly distinguish between protected & permissive Minimize confusion Reduce assumption of right-of-way Eliminate yellow trap Allow protected-only or permissive-only Eliminate need for: Special signing Special lenses or louvers

Simulated Intersection

Study Summary 464 Drivers 231 University of Massachusetts 233 Texas Transportation Institute 228 males; 204 females completed the study 4,613 Scenarios evaluated Ages 21 to 79

Study Results

PPLT Display Components PPLT Display Component Permissive Indication Display Arrangement Location Thru Indication Level Obser. Percent Correct GB 845 77 ± 3 FYA 1264 73 ± 2 GB/FYA 419 72 ± 4 5-Sect. Cluster 1260 73 ± 2 4-Sect. Vertical 422 75 ± 4 5-Sect. Vertical 846 75 ± 3 Shared 627 73 ± 3 Exclusive 1901 75 ± 2 GB 627 74 ± 2 RB 1901 74 ± 2 p-value 0.110 0.604 0.303 0.788

Study Results Findings of the driving simulator experiment include: Data showed a high level of comprehension with no variation between the different PPLT displays tested. The test drivers responded correctly 91 percent of the time with no statistical difference between the 12 PPLT displays. Data showed no statistical difference in driver comprehension when the data was analyzed by permissive indication, display, through indication, and location of the display.

Video-Based Static Evaluation

Fail Critical Responses

Results Findings of the static experiment include: 83% (of 5,230 scenarios) correct response. Circular green significantly higher fail critical responses. Displays with the FYA permissive indication had significantly more correct responses than displays with the circular green permissive indication. PPLT displays with the four-section vertical display face had a significant amount of correct responses.

Correct & Fail-Safe Responses Sc Arrangement Permitted Indication Thru Indic Percent Correct and FS Simulation Static Difference 1 5-sec cluster GB GB 88 78 10 2 5-sec cluster GB RB 92 62 30 3 5-sec cluster FYA GB 90 86 4 4 5-sec cluster FYA RB 90 76 14 5 5-sec cluster GB/FYA GB 94 85 9 6 5-sec cluster GB/FYA RB 88 86 2 7 4-sec vertical FYA GB 92 89 3 8 4-sec vertical FYA RB 91 83 8 9 5-sec vertical GB GB 91 70 21 10 5-sec vertical GB RB 89 70 19 11 5-sec vertical FYA GB 87 86 1 12 5-sec vertical FYA RB 89 83 6

Comparison of Fail Critical Responses

Conclusions No Significant Difference in 12 PPLT Displays Permissive Indication Circular Green Permissive Indication First Observed Display Driver Expectancy Learning of Permissive Indications What Drivers Do vs. What Drivers Say Drivers Often Base Decisions on Traffic

Project Results Flashing yellow arrow permissive left-turn indications was found to have a number of advantages: Well understood Significantly reduces left-turn confusion No supplemental signs Accommodate all phasing schemes Operational Add to the MUTCD

FYA Display Alternatives

FYA Implementation Sites Implemented

Woodburn, Oregon (ODOT)

Beaverton, Oregon

Broward County, Florida

Broward County Relay

Montgomery County, Maryland

Local Press

Citizen Response My opinion is that if the intersection had flashing yellow arrows at the turn-lane, this accident may have been avoided When I see a green light, my first reaction is go so I sometimes find myself responding to that trained response rather than the one that says don t go when another car is coming. Alternatively, when I see a flashing yellow arrow, there is no question that I need to watch what I m doing, look for approaching vehicles, and turn when it s safe

FYA Dual Indication Display Analysis Literature Review Analysis of Impact for FYA on Solid Yellow Arrow FYA Wide Median Analysis Impact of FYA on Pedestrian Applications Driver Comprehension Driver Comprehension and Behavioral Analysis of the Flashing Yellow Arrow Permissive Indication Pedestrian Comprehension Eye Tracking Experiment FYA Driver Expectancy Analysis Comprehension of Circular Green by PPLT Signal Position

Overview of Experimental Methodology Driving Simulator 4 Experiments Total Follow-Up Static Evaluation Independent Static Evaluations 6 Experiments Total 2 Geographic Locations 950 Participants 11,600 Permissive Left-Turn Scenarios

HPL Driving Simulator 1995 Saturn Sedan 3 Projection Screens 150 0 Field-of-View 60 Hz Refresh Rate Bose Surround Sound 1024 x 768 Resolution

Driving Simulator Experiment Development of Simulated Environment Modules Multiple factors Counterbalancing Opposing Gaps Switch to test indication Beta Testing Experimental Procedure Data Collection & Analysis

Driver Eye Movement for Left-Turns Simulator Experiment Eye and Head Tracker 3 Permissive Indications Traffic Scheme

Eye Tracker Experiment Driver Comprehension Fixations Areas of Interest Sequential Ordering Duration (focus or glance)

Eye Tracking Experiment Findings Consistent Cues Consistent Scan Pattern by Driver Opposing Traffic Right to Left Total Cues Used With Traffic 30 28 32 Without Traffic 38 35 40

Current Activities NCHRP 20-7 Field evaluation of installations New Language in the MUTCD Removal of experimental status Rapidly growing number of installations

New MUTCD Language Protected/Permissive Mode The signal indications for protected/permissive mode left turns shall be provided by a separate foursection signal face that shall be capable of displaying, from top to bottom or left to right, one of the following sets of signal indications: Steady left-turn RED ARROW, steady left-turn YELLOW ARROW, flashing left-turn YELLOW ARROW, and steady left-turn GREEN ARROW signal indications, or Steady CIRCULAR RED, steady left-turn YELLOW ARROW, flashing left-turn YELLOW ARROW, and steady left-turn GREEN ARROW signal indications.

New MUTCD Language During the permissive left-turn movement, the left-turn signal face shall display a flashing leftturn YELLOW ARROW signal indication. During the permissive left-turn movement, the signal faces for through traffic on the opposing approach shall simultaneously display green or yellow signal indications. If pedestrians crossing the lane or lanes used by the permissive left-turn movement to depart the intersection are controlled by pedestrian signal heads, the signal indications displayed by those pedestrian signal heads shall not be limited to any particular display.

New MUTCD Language A supplementary LEFT TURN YIELD ON FLASHING YELLOW (symbolic yellow arrow) (R10-XX) sign (see Figure 2B-19) may be placed adjacent to the left-turn signal face.

The FYA Story And now you know the rest of the story!

Questions? Have a good day!