Appendix A-6. Signing and Marking Guidelines. Number Name Pages. 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1. 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1

Similar documents
Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

Traffic Control Devices

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

2004 Traffic and Safety Notes. Cross Reference between the Old Note Number and the New Note Number

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

Appendix Work Zone Traffic Control

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

Presented By: Jim Roth, P.E. Signing Engineer Office of Traffic Engineering Ohio Department of Transportation 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

2003 Edition Page 2B-1

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

TRAFFIC LINE MANUAL. June 2011 TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Tract or Parcel Project Name PCN Checked By Date

CHAPTER 2F. TOLL ROAD SIGNS. Table 2F-1. Toll Road Sign and Plaque Minimum Sizes

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Signs. signs, signals and road markings. in this chapter

Chapter 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

2017 Changes to the 2011 MMUTCD January 2017

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND GATES Section 2B.01 Application of Regulatory Signs Standard:

(This page left intentionally blank)

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES

2016 Edition Page 7 PART 2 SIGNS CHAPTER 2A. GENERAL

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

CHAPTER 3 SIGNS, SIGNALS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS. Responsible Driving (Red book) NOTES & STUDY GUIDE

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE (1) For

TRAFFIC LINE MANUAL Edition Revision 1 June 2012 TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION

PART 5. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW-VOLUME ROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS

CW20-1D 48" X 48" (Flags- See note 1) G " X 24" (See note 2)

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

Speed Control & Limits

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Video Review: Signs, Signals and Markings Video Review 4.1

PART 7. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR SCHOOL AREAS CHAPTER 7A. GENERAL

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

(This page left intentionally blank)

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

DPS 201 RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 401 MOWING WORK DESCRIPTION 5

Work Zone Traffic Safety

Driver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations. Ms. Marx

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX


2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

APPENDIX C. SIGNING INDEX. Regulatory Signs

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Markings Technical Committee Chapter 3H: Roundabout Markings APPROVED IN NCUTCD COUNCIL ON JANUARY 20, 2006

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

Appendix F: Wayfinding Protocol and Best Practices

CHAPTER 2C. WARNING SIGNS AND OBJECT MARKERS Section 2C.01 Function of Warning Signs

2C-3 Placement of Warning Signs

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

Beginning School Bus Driver Curriculum UNIT IX. FIELD TRIPS and TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Revised 09/2011 Revised 10/2013 (Instructional Content)

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

2003 Edition Page 6F-1

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

November 2012: The following Traffic and Safety Notes were revised:

Traffic Engineering Update on Bike/Ped Topics. Marc Lipschultz, P.E. PTOE Central Office Traffic Engineering Division

2009 MUTCD New Provisions for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Housekeeping

guide signs or groups of signs. General provisions are given in Sections 2A.07, 2A.08, and 2A.10. Standard:

Part 8. TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR RAILROAD AND LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT GRADE CROSSINGS

Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

OMUTCD 2012 Edition Changes List Comparing the 2012 OMUTCD and the 2005 Edition (Revision 2)

2003 Edition Page 2C-1

CHAPTER 2: SIGNALS, SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

Designing with the Railroad

Sharrows and Elephants and Bike Boxes!, s, Oh My!

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS

CHAPTER 2: SIGNALS, SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons

Transcription:

MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Office of Traffic and Safety Traffic Engineering Design Division Traffic Control Devices Design Manual Appendix A-6 Signing and Marking Guidelines Number Name Pages 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1 2B.13 Speed Limit Signs at Signalized Intersections 1 2B.26 HOV Signing and Marking Approach Section 4 2B.37 One Way Signing at T-Intersections 1 2C.16 Narrow Bridge Signing and Marking 1 2C.22 Restricted Bridge Clearance Warning Signing 1 2C.37 Street Name Signs Under Warning Signs 1 2D.27 Typical Route Marker Assemblies 1 2D.30 Route Markers at Unsignalized Intersections 2 2D.34 Message Divider Applications 2 2D.38 Warning Sign Road Name Panels 1 2D.38(1) Street Name Signs at Overpass & Underpass 1 2D.38(2) Street Name Signs at Signalized Intersections 7 2D.48 Hydrant Signing at Noise Barrier Access Doors 1 2E.12 Control Cities 7 2E.13 20/15 Legend 1 2E.51 Hospital Signing Plates 2 3C.03 Bridge End/Bridge Abutment Markers 1 Appendix A-6 July 2006 Page 1

Notes: N 1. At skewed intersections mount the Stop sign (R1-1) >3^ from perpendicular. This should be done to prevent mainline traffic drivers from mistakenly viewing the Stop sign. 2. When used, Corner Street Name Signs (D3-1) shall be mounted above the stop sign. R1-1 GREATER THAN 3^ FROM PERPENDICULAR SIGN FACE 3^ = STANDARD ALIGNMENT PERPENDICULAR * MOUNT R1-1 GREATER THAN 3^ WHERE MAINLINE DRIVERS MIGHT VIEW SIGN. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPTATION SDriven to Excel State Administration STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF TRAFFIC & SAFETY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN DIVISION GUIDELINE SUBJECT: APPROVED: IENTATION OF STOP SIGNS AT SKEWED INTERSECTIONS DATE: GUIDELINE No. 2B.06 PAGE 1 1 of

Notes: W16-9p AHEAD R1-1 1. R1-6a sign may be installed at unsignalized intersections, uncontrolled approaches, or at mid-block locations. It is intended for low speed applications; typically 25mph or less. 2. R1-6a sign shall be employed in accordance with Section W11-2 3. 2B.12 of the 2003 MUTCD. A clear line of sight must be provided for motorists to see the crosswalk and signing to allow them time to stop at a normal rate based on the posted speed and conditions of the roadway. See Note 8 (Optional this side of intersection) 4. 5. On street parking should be restricted prior to the crosswalk by the local Traffic Engineer. R1-6a signs shall not be placed at signalized intersections. 6. Place R1-6a sign on the center lane line facing traffic. R1-6a may be placed on a raised median or crossing island if site conditions permit. 7. R1-6a sign shall always be installed at the leading edge of crosswalk facing traffic. R1-6a shall never be placed such that pedestrians in the crosswalk block the visibility of the sign to motorists. 8. See the 2003 MUTCD for required spacing from advance pedestrian crossing sign and pedestrian crossing sign at the crosswalk. 9. Crosswalks should be crosshatched at school crossings, mid-block crossings and intersection locations where pedestrian traffic is not expected. W11-2 R1-1 NO PARKING NEAR CROSSWALK 50 Min R1-6a * Place W11-2 and W16-7p back to back. W16-7p See Note 8 * Place R1-6a back to back. W11-2 AHEAD W16-9p XXX FT W16-2a See Note 8 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPTATION SDriven to Excel State Administration STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF TRAFFIC & SAFETY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN DIVISION GUIDELINE SUBJECT: IN STREET PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNS NON SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CROSSINGS APPROVED: DATE: GUIDELINE No. 2B.12 PAGE 1 of 1

R3-10(1) R3-11(2) R3-14(1) R3-11(1) R3-11(2) Notes: See Maryland Manual for lane line size and type. Wide "Elephant Tracks" are shown. (Type II) 1. Place regulatory sign R3-11 (1) 1/4 mile to 1/2 mile apart. Precise sign placement should be determined based on speed, location, available space and sight distance. 2. The educational sign R3-11 (2) should be substituted every 1/2 mile to 3/4 mile. 3. Pavement symbol should be spaced at 800 to 1200 foot intervals. See MUTCD (Sections 3B.22) and "standard alphabets" for highway signs and pavement markings for preferential lane symbol size & style. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPTATION SDriven to Excel State Administration STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF TRAFFIC & SAFETY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN DIVISION GUIDELINE SUBJECT: APPROVED: HOV SIGNING AND MARKING GUIDELINE No. APPROACH SECTION 2B.26 DATE: PAGE 1 4 of

R3-11(2) R3-11(1) R3-11(2) R3-11(1) R3-11(2) R3-11(3) (OPTIONAL, SEE NOTE 3.) Notes: See Maryland Manual fpr lane line size and type. "Dinosaur Tracks" shown. (Type III) 1. Place regulatory signs 1,000 to 3,000 feet apart. Precise sign placement should be determined based on speed, location, available space and sight distance. 2. Pavement symbol should be spaced at 800 to 1200 foot intervals. See MUTCD (Sections 3B.22) and "standard alphabets" for highway signs and pavement markings for preferential lane symbol size & style. 3. Install single RPMs at 40 foot spacing along Type III HOV lane markings. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPTATION SDriven to Excel State Administration STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF TRAFFIC & SAFETY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN DIVISION GUIDELINE SUBJECT: APPROVED: HOV SIGNING AND MARKING CONTINUOUS SECTION DATE: GUIDELINE No. 2B.26 PAGE 2 4 of

R3-14(1) OPTIONAL R3-14(1) OPTIONAL R3-11(1) R3-11(2) R3-11(1) R3-11(2) See Maryland Manual for lane line size and type. Wide "Elephant Tracks" are shown. (Type II) R3-11(1) R3-11(1) R3-11(2) OPTIONAL Notes: 1. Place regulatory signs 1,000 to 3,000 feet apart. Precise sign placement should be determined based on speed, location, available space and sight distance. 2. Pavement symbol should be spaced at 800 to 1200 foot intervals. See MUTCD (section 3B.22) and "standard alphabets" for highway signs and pavement markings for preferential lane symbol size & style. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPTATION SDriven to Excel State Administration STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF TRAFFIC & SAFETY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN DIVISION GUIDELINE SUBJECT: APPROVED: HOV SIGNING AND MARKING AT INTERCHANGES DATE: GUIDELINE No. 2B.26 PAGE 3 4 of

R3-12 HOV See Maryland Manual for lane line size and type. Wide "Elephant Tracks" are shown. (Type II) Notes: 1. Place regulatory signs 1,000 to 3,000 feet apart. Precise sign placement should be determined based on speed, location, available space and sight distance. 2. Pavement symbol should be spaced at 800 to 1200 foot intervals. See MUTCD (section 3B.22) and "standard alphabets" for highway signs and pavement markings for preferential lane symbol size & style. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPTATION SDriven to Excel State Administration STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF TRAFFIC & SAFETY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN DIVISION GUIDELINE SUBJECT: APPROVED: HOV SIGNING AND MARKING GUIDELINE No. TERMINAL SECTION 2B.26 DATE: PAGE 4 4 of