TEAM 12. Case 1: SAM GAGNER. Acting for PLAYER

Similar documents
2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

Team 9 IN THE MATTER OF A SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: SAM GAGNER. (The Player ) and THE EDMONTON OILERS. (The Club ) THE PLAYER S BRIEF

2013 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

Team 10. Carl Gunnarsson. Club Side

Table of Contents I. Introduction and Request for Hearing Decision... 2 Chart 1.1 Comparable Player Salaries... 3 II. Player Profile... 3 III.

Team 10 Mats Zuccarello Club Side

2014 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA. Mats Zuccarello v. The New York Rangers. Submission on Behalf of Mats Zuccarello. Midpoint: $1.

IN THE MATTER OF A SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CARL GUNNARSSON - AND - THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS HOCKEY CLUB

HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA. Carl Gunnarsson v. Toronto Maple Leafs. Submission on Behalf of the Player. Midpoint: $3.

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF CODY FRANSON TEAM 21

2013 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada. Carl Gunnarsson v Toronto Maple Leafs Submission on Behalf of Carl Gunnarsson Submission by Team 24

2014 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada. Lars Eller v. The Montreal Canadiens. Team 10. Submission on Behalf of Lars Eller

NHL SALARY ARBITRATION CHRIS STEWART AND THE ST. LOUIS BLUES BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CHRIS STEWART

Mats Zuccarello-Aasen v. New York Rangers. Team 4. Representing: the Player

In the Matter of Salary Arbitration Between: Cody Franson. -And- Toronto Maple Leafs. Brief of: Toronto Maple Leafs (Club) Team 31

Team 1. Cody Franson vs. Toronto Maple Leafs. Submission on behalf of Cody Franson (Player Side)

CARL GUNNARSSON THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

Team Number 25 Case: Cody Franson Club s Representative

2013 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: DERICK BRASSARD - AND - THE NEW YORK RANGERS HOCKEY CLUB BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DERICK BRASSARD (TEAM 8)

~ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CARL GUNNARSSON ~ IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CARL GUNNARSSON AND THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

Team 1. Lars Eller vs. Montreal Canadiens. Submissions on behalf of Montreal Canadiens (Team Side)

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARTICLE 12 SALARY ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE S COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREMEENT MATS ZUCCARELLO -AND-

IN THE MATTER OF A SALARY ARBITRATION LARS ELLER -AND- MONTREAL CANADIENS NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ARBITRATORS

2014 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA Derick Brassard vs. New York Rangers Submission on behalf of the New York Rangers Midpoint: $5 Million

In the Matter of Salary Arbitration Between: Cody Franson -AND- The Toronto Maple Leafs. Team 9. Submission of the Toronto Maple Leafs

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION CARL GUNNARSSON AND THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

2012 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN CODY FRANSON AND THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF FOR CODY FRANSON TEAM 17

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE PLAYER CODY FRANSON TEAM 3

2014 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION ERIC HOSMER V. KANSAS CITY ROYALS (MLB) SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE CLUB KANSAS CITY ROYALS

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

2015 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION

2015 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CARL GUNNARSSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF OF THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS TEAM 32

HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

2014 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA. Chris Stewart v St. Louis Blues (NHL) SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF CHRIS STEWART TEAM #14

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS ELLER -AND- THE MONTREAL CANADIENS BRIEF OF THE MONTREAL CANADIENS. Team 27

In the Matter of Salary Arbitration Between: Lars Eller -AND- The Montreal Canadiens. Team 9. Submission of Lars Eller

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS SUBMISSION OF BEHALF OF THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS TEAM 28

Team Number 25 Case: Lars Eller Club s Representative

2013 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

2014 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON. - and - THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF OF CODY FRANSON TEAM 19

2015 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION. Mark Trumbo v. Arizona Diamondbacks. Submission on Behalf of Mark Trumbo. Midpoint: $5,900,000

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS ELLER -AND- THE MONTREAL CANADIENS SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF LARS ELLER TEAM 21

HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

TULANE UNIVERISTY BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION NELSON CRUZ V. TEXAS RANGERS BRIEF FOR THE TEXAS RANGERS TEAM # 13 SPRING 2012

HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN DERRICK BRASSARD - AND - THE NEW YORK RANGERS

2014 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

2014 Tulane Baseball Arbitration Competition Josh Reddick v. Oakland Athletics (MLB)

2012 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS FOSGAARD ELLER. - and - THE MONTREAL CANADIENS BRIEF OF LARS FOSGAARD ELLER TEAM 19

2013 Tulane National Baseball Arbitration Competition

2014 Tulane Baseball Arbitration Competition Eric Hosmer v. Kansas City Royals (MLB)

2014 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

2014 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

Lorenzo Cain v. Kansas City Royals. Submission on Behalf of the Kansas City Royals. Team 14

2015 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

Dexter Fowler v. Colorado Rockies. Submission on Behalf of the Colorado Rockies. Team 18

Dexter Fowler v. Colorado Rockies (MLB)

Lars Eller v. Montreal Canadiens

Jenrry Mejia v. New York Mets Submission on Behalf of the New York Mets Midpoint: $2.6M Submission by Team 32

Team 10. Texas Rangers v. Nelson Cruz. Brief in support of Nelson Cruz

JEFF SAMARDZIJA CHICAGO CUBS BRIEF FOR THE CHICAGO CUBS TEAM 4

Jenrry Mejia v. New York Mets Submission on Behalf of New York Mets Midpoint: $2.6 Million Submission by Team 18

2014 Tulane National Baseball Arbitration Competition Jeff Samardzija v. Chicago Cubs (MLB)

Team Number 6. Tommy Hanson v. Atlanta Braves. Side represented: Atlanta Braves

TULANE BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION. Isaac Benjamin Davis. New York Metropolitan Baseball Club, Inc. ARBITRATION BRIEF FOR ISAAC BENJAMIN DAVIS

Paul M. Sommers And Justin R. Gaines. March 2010 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS ELLER - AND - THE MONTREAL CANADIENS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE MONTREAL CANADIANS HOCKEY CLUB (TEAM 8)

2013 National Baseball Arbitration Competition. Tommy Hanson v. Atlanta Braves. Submission on behalf of Atlanta Braves. Submitted by Team 28

2015 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION

Roberto Luongo's 12-year contract deal now under investigation

TULANE NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION 2012 NELSON CRUZ, PLAYER TEXAS RANGERS, TEAM BRIEF FOR TEXAS RANGERS, TEAM. Team no.

Detroit Red Wings Clips August 14, 2014

The WHL is a worldwide leader in developing professional hockey players and awarding academic scholarships.

NHL SALARY DETERMINATION AND DISTRIBUTION A THESIS. Presented to. The Colorado College. Bachelor of Arts. Ian Young. February 2015

HOW DO ENTRY-LEVEL CONTRACTS WORK?

KHL Rulebook. Section 1 - Object. Section 2 Teams. Section 3 Schedule. Section 4 Regular Season. Section 5 - Playoffs. Section 6 Active Lineup

IIHF INJURY REPORTING SYSTEM

News in Review February 2013 Teacher Resource Guide HOCKEY LOCKOUT: A Season Saved

The Puck Stops Here: Analysis of Salary Arbitration in the National Hockey League

Sport Specific Rules

Introduction IGN Entertainment, Inc.

The WHL is a worldwide leader in developing professional hockey players and awarding academic scholarships.

CONFEDERATION HOCKEY PLAYER EVALUATION GUIDELINES Season

SPORTING LEGENDS: WAYNE GRETZKY

Ian Cushenan. Matthew Hazenberg. Dr. John Byl PED 201

Season Ticket Basketball 2003

Detroit Red Wings Clips August 26, 2016

SOCHI 2014 PARALYMPIC WINTER GAMES SCHEDULE B PARALYMPIC SELECTION CRITERIA SLEDGE HOCKEY

to the Kansas City Royals for the purposes of an arbitration hearing governed by the Major

Detroit Red Wings Clips August 23-25, 2014

2013 National Baseball Arbitration Competition Tulane University Law School

Table 1: Eastern Conference Final Standings (Sorted by Current Scoring System)

Transcription:

TEAM 12 Case 1: SAM GAGNER Acting for PLAYER

1 1. Introduction This brief analyzes the statistics, attributes, comparable player salaries, and other factors of Sam Gagner ("Mr. Gagner"), center forward for the Edmonton Oilers Hockey Club (the "Club" or the "Oilers"), that are relevant to the estimation of appropriate salary compensation for the 2012-2013 season. The National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement ("CBA"), Article 12.9(g) sets the criteria for evidence that may be considered in this arbitration: 1 12.9 (g)(ii) The parties may offer evidence of the following: A) the overall performance, including official statistics prepared by the League, of the Player in the previous season or seasons; B) the number of games played by the Player, his injuries or illnesses during the preceding seasons; C) the length of service of the Player in the League and/or with the Club; D) the overall contribution of the Player to the competitive success or failure of his Club in the preceding season; E) any special qualities of leadership or public appeal not inconsistent with the fulfillment of his responsibilities as a playing member of his team; F) the overall performance in the previous season or seasons of any Player(s) who is alleged to be comparable to the party Player whose salary is in dispute. G) The compensation of any Player(s) who is alleged to be comparable to the party Player, provided, however, that in applying this or any of the above subparagraphs, the Salary Arbitrator shall not consider a Player(s) to be comparable to the party Player unless a party to the arbitration has contended that the Player(s) is comparable; nor shall the Salary Arbitrator consider the compensation or performance of a Player(s) unless a party to the arbitration has contended that the Player(s) is comparable. This arbitration will give particular attention to Players alleged to be comparable to Mr. Gagner that were eligible for arbitration in the summer of 2010-2011 or 2011-2012, and who were awarded 1-2 year contracts, either through negotiation with their Club or through a formal arbitration. Alleged comparable Players whose contracts began before the new CBA was 1 NHL Collective Bargaining Agreement. Available at http://www.nhlpa.com/about-us/cba.

2 introduced in 2005 are not valid for the purposes of this arbitration. Mr. Gagner respectfully submits that the Salary Arbitrator find that he is entitled to receive a contract with an average annual value of $3.25 million. i. Average Annual Value versus Salary When offering contracts to players, NHL teams are first and foremost concerned about the annual cap hit of the contract, rather than the player's actually yearly salary. The average annual value of the contract, or the cap hit, is the number that affects the team's overall budget for players each year. Further, NHL teams often structure contracts strategically to accommodate player preferences, reward players for giving up unrestricted free agent years, or anticipate a decrease in playing ability. 2 Thus, the salary of a player for a given year only reflects his worth to the team if analyzed from the perspective of annual average value, or the cap hit. This approach also provides parity between players with one-year contracts (where annual average value and salary are necessarily the same), and players with longer contracts, whose annual salary for a given year may appear inflated or deflated when considered on its own 3. For these reasons, we propose the use of the average annual value of players' contracts when making evaluations about Mr. Quincey's value on the Red Wings, and comparing his worth to similar players in the League. 2. Overall Performance Mr. Gagner has convincingly established himself as a young and talented offensive centreman who has produced impressive offensive statistics while also improving his underlying defensive statistics year over year. His performance statistics are all the more impressive given 2 Derek R. Marr. 2011. "The Puck Stops Here: Analysis of Salary Arbitration in the National Hockey League" at page 16. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/derek_r_marr/2. 3 ibid

3 his young age of 23 years old. 4 In Mr. Gagner s platform season, he produced 18 goals (4th most on his club), 29 assists (3rd most on his club), and 47 points (4th most on his club). 5 Mr. Gagner s contributions to his club s offensive output were especially impressive in the context of the powerplay: Although Mr. Gagner only averaged the 6th most power play ice among forwards on his club (2 minutes, 27 seconds per game), he ranked third in powerplay goals scored with 6, and 4th in powerplay points with 12. Impressively, Mr. Gagner was able to produce these offensive statistics while only receiving an average of 17 minutes and 10 seconds of ice time per game, which ranked as 7th most among forwards on his club in the 2011-2012 season. Mr. Gagner s offensive potential was displayed for all to see in the February 2nd, 2012 game against the Chicago Blackhawks when he tied an NHL record by scoring 8 points (4 goals, 4 assists) in a single game. 6 While Mr. Gagner s offensive statistics have been quite consistent through his first 5 seasons in the NHL, his defensive statistics have improved and demonstrate him to be a reliable two-way player. In 2011-12, Mr. Gagner was ranked first on his club in plus/minus with a +5. To give this statistic some context, the Edmonton Oilers as a club had a combined plus/minus of -136 while, as a team, allowed 30 more goals than they scored. Further, Mr. Gagner s plus/minus has improved from his previous two seasons where he was a -17, and -8, respectively. 3. Number of Games Played/Injuries and Illnesses Mr. Gagner has demonstrated himself to be a durable and reliable player, free of any major injuries, averaging 73 games played per season through his first 5 seasons in the NHL. It should also be noted that the injury that has caused Mr. Gagner to miss the largest number of games in his career was a hand laceration in the 2010-2011 season. This injury to Mr. Gagner s 4 Note: Unless otherwise cited, all performance statistics are drawn from www.nhl.com. 5 Rankings provided by http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/stats 6 http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/story/2012/02/03/sp-oilers-hawks.html

4 hand was caused by the skate of teammate Ryan Jones as he was leaving the Oilers bench 7. This injury may be characterized as an accident, unrelated to Mr. Gagner s style of play or durability on the ice. Furthermore, Mr. Gagner has completely healed from this injury as evidenced by it not affecting his games played in the 2011-2012 season. The other injuries that have affected Mr. Gagner s career include an ankle sprain in September 2011, a knee sprain during the 2009-2010 season, and a hip flexor injury the same season. 8 Each of these injuries were minor and there is no reason to suspect that any of them will have any impact on Mr. Gagner s future performance. 4. Length Of Service Although Mr. Gagner is only 23 years old, he has completed 5 seasons in the NHL since being drafted 6th overall in the 2007 NHL entry draft. In these 5 seasons, Mr. Gagner has played a total of 366 games, which ranks second of any player drafted in the 2007 NHL entry draft, behind only Patrick Kane who was drafted first overall that year. 9 To give the high number of games played at such a young age by Mr. Gagner further context, it is worth noting that only one player from the 2006 entry draft, Jordan Staal (selected 2nd overall), has presently played more games than Mr. Gagner. Further, only 7 players from the 2005 NHL entry draft played more games than Mr. Gagner to date. These statistics further reinforce Mr. Gagner s durability and place within the NHL. Mr. Gagner has played all of these games with Edmonton Oilers Hockey Club and is familiar with the club s system, players, coaching, and management 5. Overall Contribution The Edmonton Oilers may accurately be characterized as one of the least successful teams in the NHL in the past few seasons. This is reinforced by their statistical records the past three seasons where they respectively finished 30th, 30th, and 29th, out of 30 teams. Despite this 7 http://www.edmontonsun.com/2011/10/08/oilers-gagner-not-rushing-back 8 http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/teams/players/bio/?id=6052 9 http://www.coppernblue.com/2012/7/20/3171903/sam-gagner-edmonton-oilers-agree-on-a-one-year-contract

5 lack of success, Mr. Gagner s statistics demonstrate that he was a contributing factor to the success the Oilers did experience while his defensive play helped limit goals against. One of the few categories in which the Oilers were among the top teams in the league in 2011-2012 was the powerplay where Mr. Gagner scored 6 goals and 6 assists despite only receiving the 6th most power play ice time among Oilers forwards. Mr. Gagner placed 3rd in powerplay goals on his time and 4th in total power play points despite his limited ice time. Mr. Gagner s contribution to the Oilers powerplay helped them rank third in the NHL with a powerplay effieciency of 20.8%. The Oilers have additionally benefitted from Mr. Gagner being a right handed shooter. Within the NHL, 60% of forwards are left handed, 10 which limits their ability to handle the puck on the left side of the ice. Right-handed shots also have the advantage of a better angle to shoot from on the left wing 11. This is particularly important on the powerplay as it allows the Club more options for strategic positioning, and is likely to have contributed to the Oilers success on the powerplay. 12 Mr. Gagner has also been an integral part of the Oilers shootout roster in the past few seasons. Most recently, Mr. Gagner placed 6th overall in the NHL in the 2011-2012 season with 6 goals on 9 attempts in the shootout for a 66.7% success rate. Mr. Gagner was far and away the best shootout performer on the Oilers roster, with the next most successful shooters being Ales Hemsky who scored 3 goals on 6 attempts and Jordan Eberle who scored 3 goals on 12 attempts. Mr Gagner s proficiency in the shootout helped the Oilers win 5 of 12 shootouts, thus directly helping the Oilers secure 5 additional points in the standings. 6. Leadership and Public Appeal 10 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/sports/olympics/16lefty.html?_r=1 11 http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=568305 12 ibid

6 Mr. Gagner has received a number of accolades that speak to his leadership skills and public appeal, as well as his athletic abilities. After the 2007-2008 NHL season in which Mr. Gagner was the youngest player in the NHL, Mr. Gagner was named Oilers Rookie of the Year. That same season, Mr. Gagner was selected as one of the most talented and promising young players by the NHL to play in the young stars game as part of the NHL s all star weekend 13. In this game Mr. Gagner recorded one goal. Later that season, Mr. Gagner was the youngest player selected to represent Team Canada at the men s World Ice Hockey Championships in Quebec and Nova Scotia Canada, earning a silver medal with Team Canada 14. Mr. Gagner is the oldest member of a young talented group of players for the Edmonton Oilers hockey club and has served as a leader to these players for the past two seasons. Mr. Gagner has demonstrated his leadership ability on the ice by sticking up for teammates and fighting twice in the 2011-2012 season despite his less than imposing height and weight. Though Mr. Gagner has played on the Oilers second line in recent seasons, several hockey analysts have opined that teams across the NHL feel that Mr. Gagner is ready to take a step forward and play as a first line centreman. For example, hockey analyst Nick Kypreos wrote about other NHL teams perception of Mr. Gagner stating that other teams now believe that if you surround him with top players, like a Rick Nash or an Eric Staal in Carolina, that this guy could be a legitimate number one centerman. 15 7. Comparables Mr. Gagner s financial worth to the Edmonton Oilers may be most accurately ascertained by comparison to the salaries of similar players: 13 http://oilers.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=430194 14 http://www.hockeycanada.ca/index.php/ci_id/21256/la_id/1.htm 15 http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/2012/02/06/nhl-insider-kypreos-other-teams-now-believe-that-sam-gagnercould-be-a-legitimate-number-one-center/

7 i. David Perron When assessing NHL players against similar or comparable players, rarely do two players share the high number of similarities seen between David Perron and Sam Gagner. David Perron is 24 years old (14 months older than Mr. Gagner) and was drafted 26th overall in the 2007 NHL entry draft, 20 spots after Mr. Gagner. Both players are offense-minded, rightshooting forwards of average size with comparable offensive statistics. David Perron, therefore, serves as a very relevant and useful comparison in the determination of Mr. Gagner s monetary worth. Since entering the NHL, David Perron has played in 292 games, with totals of 74 goals, 143 assists, and 220 points through 5 seasons. Though Mr. Perron and Mr. Gagner both entered the NHL in the 2007-2008 season, Mr. Gagner has played in 74 more games and produced 47 more points. In Mr. Perron s platform season, he scored 21 goals, and 42 points in 57 games played for a points per game rate of 0.737. Mr. Gagner scored 18 goals and 47 points in 75 games for a points per game rate of 0.623. Like Mr. Gagner, Mr. Perron was used in the shootout; however, Mr. Perron was far less successful, scoring on only one of seven attempts. While these two players have produced similar offensive statistics, an important distinguishing feature between the two is their injury history. Mr. Gagner has experienced only minor injuries through his first 5 seasons while Mr. Perron suffered a serious concussion in November 2010 and missed 97 consecutive games with post concussion syndrome from November 5, 2010 until December 2, 2011. Mr. Perron rebounded well from his injury to contribute to a winning team in his platform season but with concussion concerns being on the mind of managers across the league after former Hart Trophy winner Sydney Crosby missed

8 over a calendar year of hockey with similar issues, the risk involved in signing someone with Mr. Perron s serious injury history surely limited his financial value. Mr. Perron is currently signed to a 4 year deal with the St. Louis Blues hockey club with a salary cap of 3.8125 million dollars per year. Mr. Perron s salary is $3.0 million in 2012-2013 but increases to $3.5 million in 2013-14, $4.0 million in 2014-15, and $4.5 million in 2015-16. Though Mr. Perron s current salary is $3.0 million which is $200 000 less than Mr. Gagner s in the upcoming season, his contract was clearly structured within the framework of the salary cap and Mr. Perron s cap hit of $3.8125 million may be a more useful comparison. Though the Edmonton Oilers hockey club may argue that Mr. Perron received more money to sign long term, the risk involved in signing a one year contract must also be considered. That is, if Mr. Gagner is seriously injured, he will not have the security of Mr. Perron who will be compensated for another 3 seasons. In summary, Mr. Gagner is 14 months younger than Mr. Perron and has played 74 more NHL games and has scored 47 more NHL points. Further, Mr. Gagner is a proven shoot out performer who scored more points in his platform year than Mr. Perron and demonstrated himself to be reliable defensively. For all these reasons, Mr. Gagner s cap hit should not be lower than David Perron s $3.8125 per season, yet Mr. Gagner s cap hit is $612 500 less than Mr. Perron s in the 2012-2013 season. ii. Brandon Dubinsky Mr. Dubinsky signed a four year contract with the New York Rangers hockey club in July 2011 with a salary cap hit of $4.25 million dollars. Mr. Dubinsky was paid $3.75 million in the 2011-2012 season and will be paid $3.75 million in 2012-2013 and $4.65 million for the

9 2013-2014, and 2014-2015 seasons. 16 Mr. Dubinsky serves as a useful comparable player to Mr. Gagner as both players were young, restricted free agent forwards at the time they signed their most recent contracts. Though Mr. Dubinsky s salary is much higher than Mr. Gagner s, Mr. Dubinsky s offensive statistics were similar to Mr. Gagner s. In the 2010-2011 season, which was Mr. Dubinsky s platform season, he scored 24 goals, 30 assists, and 54 points. Mr. Dubinsky followed up this performance by scoring 10 goals, 14 assists, and 24 points in the 2011-2012 season. In comparison, Mr. Gagner scored 23 more points including 10 more points on the power play. Further, Mr. Dubinsky finished his platform season with a plus/minus of -3 on a New York Rangers team that was cumulatively a +86. Mr. Gagner, by comparison, was a +5 on an Oilers team that was cumulatively a -136. Mr. Gagner s comparable offensive stats and superior defensive stats signify that his salary should be at least equivalent to Mr. Dubinsky s current $3.75 million, or $4.25 million cap hit. Further, Mr. Gagner is 2 years younger than Mr. Dubinsky was when he signed his contract after his platform season, indicating that Mr. Gagner has a greater potential for development and improvement. iii. Clarke MacArthur Mr. MacArthur is currently signed to a 2 year contract for $3.25 million per season with the Toronto Maple Leafs hockey club. Mr. McArthur is 4 years older and has played 2 more NHL seasons than Mr. Gagner, therefore having less potential for future development. Despite being older and having spent more time in the NHL than Mr. Gagner, Mr. MacArthur has played in 3 less games over their careers and has produced 27 less points. In the 2011-2012 NHL season, Mr. MacArthur scored 20 goals, 23 assists, and 43 points for the Toronto Maple Leafs. With the aforementioned considerations as to Mr. Gagner s superior offensive statistics, and greater number of NHL games played despite being four years younger and having greater 16 http://capgeek.com/players/display.php?id=627

10 potential for future development and improvement, Mr. Gagner s salary should at least be in line with Mr. MacArthur s $3.25 million per season, yet is being compensated less. 8. Conclusion Despite his young age, Mr. Gagner has been able to establish himself as an integral part of the Oiler's offense. During his 5 years on the Club's roster, Mr. Gagner has played 366 NHL games, scored over 40 points every season, and has steadily improved every aspect of his game. Not only did he have a career high year in goals and average points per game in the platform year, but he tied an NHL record for most points in a single game, with 8 points against the Chicago Blackhawks. 17 Mr. Gagner has also demonstrated that he is a highly effective player on the powerplay and in shootouts. It is this offensive skill and durability that has made Mr. Gagner an asset to the Club. Further, at only 23 years of age, Mr. Gagner has continued to showcase his potential to develop into an elite forward in the NHL, the value of which cannot be overlooked, especially for a young team such as Edmonton who are looking to build for the future. Mr. Gagner deserves a salary that reflects that of similar players, Mr. Gagner's offensive skill, and his potential for future development in the Club. Mr. Gagner submits that $3.25 million per year would be fair compensation given these considerations. 17 http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/story/2012/02/03/sp-oilers-hawks.html