FRICTION AND SURFACE TEXTURE EVALUATION OF GREEN COLORED BIKE LANES

Similar documents
EVALUATION OF A GREEN BIKE LANE WEAVING AREA IN ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA. William W. Hunter Senior Research Scientist

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Evaluation of a Combined Bicycle Lane/Right Turn Lane in Eugene, Oregon

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Evaluation

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

ADVISORY BICYCLE LANES REALITY VERSUS DESIGN GUIDANCE

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

Colored Entrance Treatments for Rural Traffic Calming

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Arlington County, Virginia ~ National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Transportation and Land-Use Connections (TLC) Program

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Relationship of Road Lane Width to Safety for Urban and Suburban Arterials

Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Saturation Flow Rate, Start-Up Lost Time, and Capacity for Bicycles at Signalized Intersections

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

RAMP CROSSWALK TREATMENT FOR SAN DIEGO AIRPORT, TERMINAL ONE

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

INTERSECTION DESIGN. Bicycle Facility Workshop Intersections 4-1

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

At each type of conflict location, the risk is affected by certain parameters:

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

The Effect of Pavement Marking on Speed. Reduction in Exclusive Motorcycle Lane. in Malaysia

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

444 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 249, Washington, DC (202) Fax: (202) ERRATA

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Do Bike Lane Stripes Calm Motor Traffic? Wayne Pein

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

(This page left intentionally blank)

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

ITS Animated LED Signals. Alert Drivers to Pedestrian Threats

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

APPENDIX G SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SUPPLEMENT

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

INTERSECTION DESIGN TREATMENTS

PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850. Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM. S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner

USER GUIDE FOR R1-6 GATEWAY TREATMENT

Addressing Deficiencies HCM Bike Level of Service Model for Arterial Roadways

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

A Study of Effectiveness of Midblock Pedestrian Crossings: Analyzing a Selection of High-Visibility Warning Signs

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Colored Bike Lanes Request to Experiment

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts. Presentation to the Howard-Suamico School Board November 26, 2007

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Roundabout Design: Safety and Capacity Background Paper July 25, 2004

The Traffic Monitoring Guide: Counting Bicyclists and Pedestrians. APBP 2017 June 28: 11:15am-12:45pm

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

USER GUIDE FOR R1-6 GATEWAY TREATMENT

EVALUATION OF HAWK SIGNAL AT GEORGIA AVENUE AND HEMLOCK STREET, NW IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FINAL REPORT. August 30, 2010

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

STANLEY STREET December 19, 2017

T R A F F I C S K IL L S 101

Turn Lane Warrants: Concepts, Standards, Application in Review

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Simulation Analysis of Intersection Treatments for Cycle Tracks

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Date: April 4, Project #: Re: A Street/Binford Street Traffic/Intersection Assessment

RIGHT TURNS AT INTERSECTIONS: ARE THERE ALTERNATIVES?

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

Towards Effective Design Treatment for Right Turns at Intersections with Bicycle Traffic

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

City of Dallas Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Control and Safety Treatments at Trail-Road Crossings

G AT E WAY PLAN. Community BRIEFING KIT GATEWAY BIKE

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Transcription:

FRICTION AND SURFACE TEXTURE EVALUATION OF GREEN COLORED BIKE LANES Edward Offei (), Guangming Wang (), Charles Holzschuher (), Bouzid Choubane () (Corresponding Author), and DeWayne Carver () () Florida Department of Transportation 00 N.E. th Avenue, Gainesville, FL 0 Phone: () -00 E-mail: Edward.Offei@dot.state.fl.us E-mail: Guangming.Wang@dot.state.fl.us E-mail: Charles.Holzschuher@dot.state.fl.us E-mail: Bouzid.Choubane@dot.state.fl.us E-mail: DeWayne.Carver@dot.state.fl.us Paper submitted for presentation and publication at the TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TH ANNUAL MEETING JANUARY -, 0, Washington, D.C. August, 0 Word Count: Abstract = Text = 0 Tables and Figures x 0 = 0 Total = 0

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 0 ABSTRACT Interest in colored treatment on bicycle lanes and crossings has been growing in the United States in recent years. In comparison, this practice, has been prevalent in European cities for longer time. It was not until 0 that the green colored treatment received official interim approval from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for experimental use on bicycle facilities across the country (). This study focused primarily on evaluating the friction and texture characteristics of five () independent green colored bicycle lane projects consisting of either () Epoxy Modified, () Thermoplastic, or () High Friction Surface Treatment materials in Florida. A total of three types of existing pavement surfaces (concrete, open and dense graded asphalt pavements) were used as substrate for the colored application. These chosen sites include both control test sections representing the bike lanes with limited/no traffic interaction and keyhole sections that represent traffic conflict areas (areas where bicycles and vehicles come into conflict). The friction and texture values were obtained using the Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT) and Circular Texture Meter (CTM), respectively. Results indicated that all green bike lane projects met the initial friction number requirements for Florida s Patterned Textured Pavements. Minor friction loss was observed at the keyhole sections when compared to the control sections indicative of traffic wear effects. Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed that factors such as pavement surface type as well as type of green bike lane material applied and the presence of traffic wear have significant influence on the friction values. In addition, based on mean profile depth (MPD) measurements, only the interaction of pavement surface type and the bike lane treatment type had significant impact on the texture. The presence of traffic was not a significant factor. All these results ultimately lead to new design criteria in 0 permitting a more wide-spread application of green colored bike lanes on the Florida State Highway System. Keywords: Friction, Texture, Green Colored Bike Lane, Dynamic Friction Tester, Circular Texture Meter

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 0 0 0 INTRODUCTION Background The AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities defines a bike lane as a portion of a roadway which has been designated by striping, signing, and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists (). To delineate these lanes, in 0, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued an Interim Approval for the optional use of green colored treatment (). This approval grants highway agencies permission to experiment with the use of green colored marking for bicycle lane application. These colored pavements serve as traffic control devices to designate locations where bicyclists are expected to operate and areas where bicyclists and other roadway traffic might have potential conflicts (keyhole) (). Available data reviewed by FHWA indicated that, although no statistical increase in safety or decrease in crashes has been associated with the use of green bike lanes, positive operational effects such as bicyclists positioning themselves more accurately as they travel through intersections and through conflict areas. Also, both motorists and, more importantly, bicyclists felt safer. From an operational stand, the experimental green colored pavement was considered successful for the bicycle applications (). In accordance with the conditions of the interim approval, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requested and received permission from FHWA for use of the green colored treatments to be applied at bicycle locations on the State Highway Systems (). Conditions that warrant a green colored treatments to be used on bicycle lanes on the State Highway System in Florida are: (a) when a traffic conflict area (keyhole) exists at where a bike lane crosses at right turn lane, or where a channelized right turn lane crosses a bike lane, or a bike lane is adjacent to a dedicated bus bay, (b) a history of or more motor vehicle-bicycle crashes exist at or adjacent to the traffic conflict area over the most recent three-year period, and (c) when conflicts between cyclists and motor vehicles has been observed/documented at an average rate of two conflicts per peak hour. Figure presents a typical green colored bike lane with separate right turn lane. In 0, FDOT s criteria for application of green colored bike lanes was modified to remove the crash history requirement. The new criteria permits application of green colored bike lanes in conflict areas on roadways with a speed limit of 0 mph or greater, primarily as a result of the study described in this report. Hunter et al () reported that intersections and intersection-related locations accounted for 0 to 0% of reported bicycle-motor vehicle crashes. According to their study, colored treatment on bike lanes has been used widely especially in European cities as a countermeasure that has the potential to reduce conflicts and crashes at bicycle-motor vehicle crossings (). Another study by Hunter et al. evaluated the use of blue colored bike lane treatment and signage system to delineate selected bicycle-motor vehicle conflict areas in Portland, Oregon. The study used videotaped analysis and found positive behavior changes, as significantly higher numbers of motorists yielded to cyclists and slowed or stopped before entering the blue pavement areas and. more cyclists followed the blue colored bike lane path. As a result of the blue pavement, fewer cyclists turned their heads to scan for traffic or use hand signals, showing increased comfort level. According to the study, majority of motorists surveyed felt safe at the blue colored bike areas (). No measurable increase in safety was associated with this study, however, and the conclusions were based on the perception of the participants, not on a statistical change in crash rates.

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 0 0 0 Studies conducted on the addition of red colored treatment on bicycle lanes in the community of Tavares, Florida, to provide visual narrowing and to emphasize their use as a bicycle facility, found that there was no increase in motor vehicle speeds after the addition of the red colored pavement, but also that motorists provided greater passing distance from cyclists when there was no red colored shoulder (). This study also found no measurable increase in safety, and the operational benefits could be questioned based on assumptions about how cyclists operate most safely in traffic. Hunter, Srinivasan and Martell () studied the effectiveness of green colored pavement and accompanying signage used in St. Petersburg, Florida in a bike lane weaving area, where motor vehicles across the bike lane, near an intersection. Operation of motorists and bicyclists at the weaving area was observed and videotaped before and after the green pavement and signing treatments were installed. It was concluded that an increased percentage of motorists yielded to bicycles, and significantly higher percentage of bicyclist scanned for proximate vehicles and signaled their intention to turn right after the green colored pavement has been installed. The study also found the green colored bike lanes were more effective when supported by variable message signs. The study did not find any increase in safety or reduction of crashes associated with the application of the green colored bike lanes. Studies by Sadek et al. () evaluated the effectiveness of a green, high visibility bike lane and crossing treatment located on a cloverleaf interchange in Vermont through field surveys and videotaping in the vicinity of on- and off- ramps. The study concluded that the green bike lane treatment was associated with a majority of bicyclists using the bike lanes instead of the sidewalk or the road, and the motorists think that the treatment has made them more aware of the potential conflict with bicyclist. Also, the green bicycle lanes and crossings appear to increase both bicyclists awareness of motor-vehicle and motorists awareness of bicycles. As with previous studies, the study provided indirect evidence of operational advantages but no direct improvement in safety associated with the installation of the green colored bike lanes. Most of the previous research studies have focused on the operational effectiveness of green colored bike lanes and/or the effect of high-visibility bicycle lane and crossing treatments and have found no direct correlation between an improvement in safety and reduction in crashes associated with the use of green colored bike lanes. FDOT recognized the lack of data regarding any real safety benefits from green colored bike lanes as being exacerbated by the general lack of these facilities on State roadways, where they could be adequately monitored. Since the studies do not indicate the green colored bike lanes reduce safety, FDOT considered ways to increase the installation of these facilities, in part to monitor their true safety impacts and to address requests from local governments for greater use of the green colored bike lanes. To avoid potentially creating new safety problems, FDOT wanted to determine whether the green materials create any issues with pavement friction for either cyclists or motorists. Cyclists have noted that thermoplastic, in particular, can be very slippery when wet, so there were concerns about introducing large amounts of these new green colored materials in the bike lane. This led to an effort to research the friction properties of green colored bike lanes. However, no literature on the frictional performance was found on green colored bike lanes. Consequently, this paper focuses on the performance evaluation of green colored bike lanes in terms of friction and texture characteristics.

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 0 FIGURE : Typical green colored bike lane with separate right turn lane (). OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the friction and surface texture characteristics on selected green colored bike lanes in Florida. Five independent green colored bicycle lane projects consisting of either () Epoxy Modified, () Thermoplastic, or () High Friction Surface treatment materials were respectively considered. A total of three types of existing pavement surfaces (concrete, open and dense graded asphalt pavements) were used as substrate for the colored application. These chosen sites include both control test sections representing the bike lanes with limited/no traffic interaction and keyhole sections that represent traffic conflict areas (areas where bicycles and vehicles come into conflict). The friction and texture values were obtained using the Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT) and Circular Texture Meter (CTM), respectively. TEST EQUIPMENT Two test devices were used for field testing and evaluation. Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT), which measures the friction in terms of the coefficient of friction as defined in ASTM E (), and a

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 Circular Texture Meter (CTM),which measures the surface texture in terms of the Mean Profile Depth (MPD) defined in E (0). These devices used are briefly introduced herein. Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT) The Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT) is used to measure the frictional properties of paved surfaces as a function of speed. The DFT equipment and test method are described in ASTM E (). The DFT consists of a horizontal spinning disk fitted with three spring loaded rubber sliders which contact the paved surface as the disk rotational speed decreases due to the friction generated between the sliders and the paved surface. Each slider is spring-loaded to. N (. lbf). A water supply unit delivers water to the paved surface during testing. The water supply is regulated by elevation, and the optimum positioning for the water tank is 0. m (. ft) above the test surface. At this position, the water flow is maintained at.l/min (0. gal/min).the torque generated by the slider forces measured during the spin down is used to calculate the friction as a function of speed. Figure shows pictures of the DFT equipment. 0 0 (a) (b) FIGURE (a) Dynamic Friction Tester (DFT) and (b) the spring loaded rubber slider Circular Track Meter (CTM) The Circular Texture Meter (CTM) is a laser device used to measure surface texture as standardized in ASTM E (0). The charge-coupled device (CCD) laser displacement sensor is mounted on an arm that rotates around a central point at a fixed distance above the pavement and measures the change in surface elevation. The CTM is a portable device and collects data along a. in. ( mm) diameter circle, which yields a measurement length of. in (mm), sampled by the data acquisition system to collect 0 points in one rotation. The CTM equipment is illustrated in Figure.

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 0 (a) (b) FIGURE (a) Circular Track Meter (CTM) and (b) the laser sensor FIELD TESTING AND EVALUATION Five test sites on the state highway systems in two different counties in Florida were selected for this study. The selected sites have been in operation for more than a year and have green colored bike lanes of different treatments consisting of either Epoxy Modified, Thermoplastic, or High Friction Surface Treatment. A total of three types of existing pavement surfaces (concrete, open and dense graded asphalt pavements) were used as substrate for the colored application (Table ). Figure shows a typical test plan used for the field testing and evaluation. As shown, the test section for each bike lane was divided into two sections, namely a control test section representing the bike lane with limited/no traffic interaction and a keyhole section that represent a traffic conflict area (conflict between motor-vehicle and bicyclists). Three tests were conducted on the control test section, and six at the keyhole test section. The keyhole test section has tests performed on the green colored stripes (keyhole on-stripe) and the other on the existing untreated pavement surface between stripes (keyhole off-stripe). Both DFT and CTM tests were performed at each test location shown in the test plan. For the DFT test, friction values in terms of DFT (expressed as coefficient of friction) at 0mph (0km/h), 0mph (0km/h) and 0 mph (0km/h) were recorded, whiles the surface texture measured in terms of the mean profile depth (MPD) were obtained from the CTM test. Field test results for the five test sections are presented in the following section of the paper.

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 Test Location FIGURE Typical Test Plan for the green colored bike lane. Existing Surface Type TABLE Test Plan of Bike Lanes Type of Bike Lane Treatment Green Colored Paints (field photos) Number of Tests per Equipment DFT CTM Site Rigid Pavement, Transverse Grooved Epoxy Modified Coating Site Dense Graded AC Epoxy Modified Coating

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver Test Location Existing Surface Type Type of Bike Lane Treatment Green Colored Paints (field photos) Number of Tests per Equipment DFT CTM Site Dense Graded AC Thermoplastic Site Open Graded AC High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST) Site Open Graded AC Epoxy Modified Coating 0 DATA ANALYSIS It is important to note that there been no studies conducted on the evaluation of friction/surface texture characteristics on colored bicycle lanes. This study considered several different types of pavement surfaces (rigid, dense graded friction course, open graded friction course). Florida Department of Transportation developed a test method FM -, Patterned Textured Pavement, for measuring friction on patterned pavements. This test method covers the test procedures for evaluating the friction resistance of patterned/textured surfaces used in crosswalks over asphalt and concrete surfaces using the Locked Wheel Friction Tester and Dynamic Friction Tester (). This test method has previously developed equations for converting friction values between the Locked Wheel Tester and the Dynamic Friction Tester. Table shows the summary friction numbers.

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver TABLE Friction Number Table () 0 Friction results for all test sites presented in Table indicate the DFT (expressed as coefficient of friction) at a speed of 0 mph (DFT0) at both the bike lane control and keyhole on-stripe sections exceed the requirements for friction (Table ) for new construction as specified in FM -, Friction Measuring Protocol for Patterned Pavements (). In addition, the friction number performance for the keyhole off-stripe sections were shown to either produce similar or less values when compared to the control and keyhole on-stripe sections. When comparing traffic effects on friction, comparisons between the control and keyhole on-stripe showed some locations being affected more than others. For example, site (a) on-ramp results indicate that the control and keyhole on-stripe have significant departure with friction data which may be due to vehicular traffic effects. It was also observed that these trends did not apply to Site (b) off-ramp location. However, further long term friction evaluations are recommended to understand traffic and age effects more fully. The friction on the control and the keyhole on-stripe section at Site is significantly higher than the existing open grade friction course (OGFC) surface (keyhole offstripe).

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 Test Sites Site Site Site (a) On- Ramp Site (b) Off- Ramp Site Site TABLE DFT Measurements on all Test Sections Existing Surface Keyhole Off - Bike Lane Control Section Bike Lane Keyhole On -Stripe Stripe Run# Testing Speed, mph (km/h) Testing Speed, mph (km/h) Testing Speed, mph (km/h) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 () 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 () 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 () 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. AVG 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. AVG 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. AVG 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. AVG 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. AVG 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. AVG 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 The texture measurements are presented in Table. Texture results at Site indicated that the green treatment material has a slight increase on the surface texture when applied to the transverse grooved rigid pavement. Results from Site and Site indicated the green treatment material has little effect on the surface texture when compared to the existing dense grade friction course (DGFC) surfaces. The CTM test results for Site shows that the MPD on the control and keyhole on-stripe sections are higher than the existing (keyhole off-stripe) open graded friction course (OGFC) surface. Site texture results indicates the MPD values on the bike lane material reduces texture slightly. Field observations indicate that the keyhole on-stripe treatment material has finer aggregates than the existing OGFC, which is why the green bike lane MPD values are lower. In addition, there appears to be vehicular wear patterns on the keyhole on-stripe section due to traffic (Figure ). FIGURE. Traffic wear area noted from the keyhole on-stripe for Site. Test Sites Site Site Site (a) Onramp TABLE. Texture Measurements at all Test Sites Run# Bike Lane Control Test Section CTM, MPD (in.) Bike Lane Keyhole On- Stripe Existing Surface Keyhole Off- Stripe 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 AVG 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 Test Sites Site (b) Offramp Site Site Comparative Analysis Run# Bike Lane Control Test Section CTM, MPD (in.) Bike Lane Keyhole On- Stripe Existing Surface Keyhole Off- Stripe 0.00 0.00 0.0 AVG 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVG 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVG 0.0 0.0 0.0 The summary DFT comparisons for the different test sections is presented in Figure. Overall, friction at the control sections are slightly higher than the keyhole on-stripe sections due to the influence of vehicular traffic. Only the Site on-ramp location had a significant departure of friction between the control and keyhole on-stripe section. All DFT values at 0mph (DFT0) at both the control and keyhole on-stripe sections meet the minimum requirements specified in FM - (). Comparison of the average MPDs on the control, keyhole on-stripe and keyhole off-stripe sections at the different sites are shown in Figure. Site has the highest MPD values, while Site (a) & (b) has the lowest MPD values. The variance in MPDs may be attributed to the texture properties of the different pavement surfaces. Generally, open graded friction course (OGFC) pavement surfaces have higher MPD values compared with dense graded friction course (DGFC) surfaces. Based on the projects evaluated, the green bike lane material seems to have minimal impact on the surface texture.

Coefficient of Friction Coefficient of Friction Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 Test of Speed (mph) Site Site Site (a) Site (b) Site Site (a) Comparison of sites for the DFT test on the control sections. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 Test of Speed (mph) Site Site Site (a) Site (b) Site Site (b) Comparison of sites for the DFT test on the keyhole on-stripe sections.

Average MPD (in.) Coefficient of Friction Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 Test of Speed (mph) Site Site Site (a) Site (b) Site Site (c) Comparison of sites for the DFT test on the keyhole off-stripe sections. FIGURE. Comparison of sites for the DFT test 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Control Keyhole On Stripe Keyhole-Off Stripe Test locations Site Site Site (a) Site (b) Site Site FIGURE. Comparison of sites for the MPDs

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS In order to investigate factors that may affect the friction properties and surface texture characteristics of green bike lanes, multiple factorial ANOVA analysis was performed. First, a three-way ANOVA analysis was conducted to check whether the motor-vehicle traffic wear levels (at the control section without vehicle traffic and keyhole section with vehicle traffic), project site (which includes features of the existing pavement surface and the type of green material applied) and testing speeds (0, 0 and 0 mph) have significant influence on friction numbers or not. The null hypothesis (H0) was that vehicle traffic wear, project site, test speeds and their interactions have no significant influence on the friction numbers at a significance level of α (α = 0.0 in this study), whereas the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was that these three factors and their interactions have significant influence on the friction numbers. The key index used to interpret the ANOVA results was the p-value which evaluates whether the null hypothesis is true or not. In other words, a low p-value (less than 0.0) would indicate that there is significant difference between test groups while a high p-value (greater than 0.0) would indicate otherwise. The friction measurements of both the control and keyhole on-stripe sections from all five test sites were used as observations in the ANOVA and the results are presented in Table. Based on the p-values, it can be concluded that both traffic and project site had significant influence on the friction measurements, while the DFT test speed did not. This means the friction measurements are affected by the traffic wear levels and project site which includes features of pavement surface types as well as the green bike lane material applied. Both the interaction of project site and test speed (b*c) and the interaction of the traffic and the project site are significant (a*b), given the p-value is less than 0.0. The traffic and the DFT test speed interaction has a p-value of 0., indicating no significant interaction between these two factors. However, the interaction among all three factors (test speed, traffic, and project site) is not significant. TABLE. Three-way Factorial ANOVA Results on DFT 0 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value P Value Traffic Wear (a) 0.0 0.0. <.000 Project Site (b).00 0. 0. <.000 DFT Test Speed (c) 0.00 0.00. 0. a*b 0.0 0.0. <.000 a*c 0.000 0.000 0.00 0. b*c 0.0 0.00. 0.0 a*b*c 0.00 0.000 0. 0. Error 0.0 0.00 Total 0. The significance of traffic wear and project site on the surface texture measurements (MPD) was also tested using a two-way ANOVA analysis. The MPD measurements of both control and keyhole on-stripe sections from all five project sites were used as observations in the analysis and the results are presented in Table. It can be concluded that project site has significant

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver influence on the MPD measurements, while the traffic wear showed otherwise. The interaction between the factor of traffic wear and the project site is not statistically significant. TABLE. Two-Way Factorial ANOVA Results on the MPD Measurements Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value P Value Traffic Wear (a).e-0.e-0 0. 0. Project Site (b) 0.00 0.00 0. <.000 0 0 0 CONCLUSION a*b 0.000.E-0 0. 0. Error 0.00.E-0 Total 0.0 This study was aimed at evaluating the friction and surface texture characteristics of five selected green bike lane sites in Florida. Based on the results, the following key findings and conclusions are drawn: All green bike lane projects met the initial friction number requirements for Florida s Patterned Textured Pavement Specification. Minor friction loss was observed at the keyhole sections when compared to the control sections indicating traffic wear effects. On average for each independent test site, friction values at the control sections are higher than the keyhole on-stripe sections. Three-Way factorial ANOVA indicated that the project site (which includes pavement surface type as well as type of green bike lane material applied) and traffic wear have significant influence on the friction values, while the DFT test speed has no statistical influence on the friction values. Two-way factorial ANOVA indicated that the project site has a significant influence on the surface texture or Mean Profile Depth (MPD) measurements, while the traffic wear has no significant influence on the MPD measurements. These results ultimately lead to new design criteria in 0 permitting a more wide-spread application of green colored bike lanes on the State Highway System. Having determined the use of the green bike lane materials do not create a hazard in themselves, FDOT is now collecting data in an attempt to determine if green colored bike lanes can show a measurable increase in safety or decrease in crashes compared to conventional bike lane designs. It will also continue to monitor the long term frictional and surface texture characteristics, as well as distress performance on these colored bicycle lanes. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The work represented herein was the result of a team effort. The authors would like to acknowledge the Nondestructive Testing Unit of the FDOT State Material Office, for their assistance with the data collection effort.

Offei, E., Wang, G., Holzschuher, C., Choubane, B., and D. Carver 0 0 0 0 DISCLAIMER The content of this paper reflects the views of the authors who are solely responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data as well as for the opinions, findings and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Florida Department of Transportation. This paper does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. In addition, the above listed agency assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. REFERENCES. FHWA. MUTCD-Interim Approval for Optional Use of Green Colored Pavement for Bike Lanes IA-. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington D.C., 0. Retrieved on July, 0 from http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/interim_approval/ia/index.htm.. AASHTO. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Fourth Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C., 0.. FDOT. Plan Preparation Manual, Volume, Design Criteria and Process. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Tallahassee, Florida Report No. -000-00, 0. Retrieved on July, 0 from http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/ppmmanual/ppm.shtm.. Hunter, W.W., J.C. Stutts, W.E. Pein, and C. L. Cox. Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Types of the Early 0s. Publication FHWA-RD--. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D. C.,. Hunter, W.W., D.L. Harkey, J.R., Stewart, and Mia L. Birk. Evaluation of Blue Bike-Lane Treatment in Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record No. 0, Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Research, Washington, D.C., pp. 0-, 000. Hunter, W.W. An Evaluation of Red Shoulders as a Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Tallahassee, Florida, Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety,.. Hunter, W.W., Srinivasan, R., and C.A. Martell. Evaluation of A Green Bike Lane Weaving Area in St. Petersburg, Florida. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Tallahassee, Florida, FDOT Contract BA Final Report, 00.. Sadek, A. W., Dickason, A. and Kaplan, Jon. Effectiveness of Green, High-Visibility Bike Lane and Crossing Treatment. Presentation at Transportation Research Board th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 00. ASTM E. Standard Test Method for Measuring Paved Surface Frictional Properties using the Dynamic Friction Tester. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa. 0. ASTM E. Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Macrotexture Properties Using the Circular Track Meter. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa.. FDOT. Florida Test Method for Friction Measuring Protocol for Patterned Pavements, Designation FM -. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida, 0