Erling J. Solberg, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)

Similar documents
Technology and the 3Rs in wildlife research: the state of the art. Who am I, and where am I coming from? John Linnell.

Aquaculture, Introductions and Transfers and Transgenics Focus Area Report

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L LCCMR Work Plan

48 7 ( ; $ 6 :, / ' /, ) (

Council CNL(14)45 The management approach to salmon fisheries in Norway (Tabled by Norway)

SEA GRANT PROGRESS REPORT

Wyoming Range Mule Deer Project. Summer 2017 Update

THE NORWEGIAN MANAGEMENT OF THE RED KING CRAB. Guri Hjallen Eriksen The Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs,

Determining Potential Environmental and Social Factors Affecting the Success of the Black Rhinoceros in Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa

Where do the northern Atlantic salmon feed during their sea residence in the Norwegian, Greenland or Barents Sea?

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

HOME RANGE AND HABITAT USE OF PLAINS SPOTTED SKUNKS IN THE OZARK MOUNTAINS OF ARKANSAS

2009 Update. Introduction

Ecology and Environmental Impact of Javan Rusa Deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in the Royal National Park

22 Questions from WildEarth Guardians - September 19, 2016

Tennessee Black Bear Public Opinion Survey

Assessment of Guide Reporting & Preliminary Results of Lion Monitoring

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Deer-Elk Ecology Research Project

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF EAST REGION WILDLIFE RESEARCH PROGRAM

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

(Tabled by the Russian Federation)

Reducing Risk of Whale Entanglements in Oregon Dungeness Crab Gear

Good morning and welcome to Norway and Molde! Let me start with reminding us all why we are here.

APPENDIX A. Population characteristics, movements, and disease surveillance in the Palisades mountain goat herd, Wyoming 2015.

NINA Aquatic Research Station, Ims

PRESENTATION TO TOWN BOARD

Project Updates January 2015

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Tracking Juvenile Summer Flounder

2015 Florida Black Bear Hunt Summary Report

Rosettes, Rifles and Regulation: A Synthesis of the leopard hunting industry in Africa

BRIEFING on IBERIAN LYNX (Lynx pardinus) MANAGEMENT PLAN AT DOÑANA NATIONAL PARK

Goldfish control in the Vasse River: summary of the 2008 programme

Monitoring Amur Leopards in Southwest Primorskii Krai, Russia

2012 Wildlife Studies

Influence of nutritional condition on migration, habitat selection and foraging ecology of elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Wyoming

GLOBAL RE-INTRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES

Predation risk theory for optimising control of wild deer. A.D.M. Latham, M.C. Latham & D. Herries

Lures to monitor and control vertebrates at low densities: sex pheromone attractants

4. Instruction in telemetry requires IACUC review if live vertebrates are used in the training session. a. True b. False

Identifying Mule Deer Migration Routes

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

1. Deer hunting structure around your property Please tick the appropriate box in each block.

Observations of Deer and Wolves during the 2017 Moose Survey

RE-ESTABLISHMENT PLAN FOR THE WILD REINDEER POPULATION IN NORDFJELLA ZONE 1

USDA APHIS WILDLIFE SERVICES ACTIVITIES SUMMARY REPORT 2013 WHITE-TAILED DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR (September 2013)

USING THE CAMERA ESTIMATE METHOD FOR POPULATION ESTIMATES OF WILD RED DEER (Cervus elaphus) IN SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

National Survey Report of the West African Giraffe, Niger August 2017

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

Lifeforce Foundation Orca Conservation Programs

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Kolarctic ENPI CBC Kolarctic salmon project (KO197) - Report VI

FIELDTRIP REPORT. The Selati River flowing. 5 th January to 7 th March st WET SEASON. Report by:

TIEE Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology - Volume 2, August 2004

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Frequently Asked Questions Reintroduction of Bison to Banff National Park

DUE DATE: PR-Friday DW: Earthworm Activity

DOT HS September Crash Factors in Intersection-Related Crashes: An On-Scene Perspective

Early History, Prehistory

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

Marine Mammals. James M. Price. Division of Environmental Sciences. from NOAA photograph library

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT. (No. 47 of 2013)

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

BOTSWANA. African Wildlife & Community Conservation Research Expedition

Iroquoia Heights Conservation Area White-tailed Deer Management Strategy

submitted: fall 2009

Rural Ontario s Hidden Sector: The Economic Importance of the Horse Industry Final Report

EU initiatives on FAD research

HABITUATED BEARS IN ROMANIA A CHALLENGE FOR ROMANIAN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT

Reindeer & Moose. Literacy Centers For 2 nd & 3 rd Grades. FREE from The Curriculum Corner

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Red Wine Mountains Herd (RWMH) Caribou

Biodiversity benefits from NZ s major predator control regimes

Deer Management Unit 249

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

Report of Raccoon Dog management in Finland for 2016

RURAL COMMUNITY QUOTAS IN NORWAY - INTENTIONS AND IMPACTS

Wave-Current Interaction in Coastal Inlets and River Mouths

2007 Nordquist Wood Bison Inventory

Predator-Prey Interactions: Bean Simulation. Materials

Into the Al Hajar with the Arabian Tahr 2012 FIELD REPORT

A Review of Mule and Black-tailed Deer Population Dynamics

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

Full Spectrum Deer Management Services

Chronic Wasting Disease: new experience in Europe

Prevention Of Accidents Caused By Rotating Transit Bus Wheels By James M. Green, P.E., DEE

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

The surveillance programme for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in free ranging and captive cervids in Norway 2017

N.H. Sea Grant Research Project Post Completion Report For time period 2/1/15 1/31/16

MPC-432 January 1, December 31, 2013

WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES IN NORWEGIAN FIELD RESEARCH? Geir Wing Gabrielsen Norwegian Animal Research Authority

FIELDTRIP REPORT. 7 th June to 8 th August 2016 DRY SEASON. Report by: Jessica Comley, Rhodes University, Grahamstown

STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF MINING, LAND AND WATER LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION AS

Assessment of giraffe populations and conservation status in East Africa. People s Trust for Endangered Species Final Report: May 2016

GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT CAPTURES, RELOCATIONS, AND REMOVALS IN NORTHWEST WYOMING

Report of Raccoon Dog management in Finland for 2017

Transcription:

Project information Keywords Moose (Alces alces), space use, migrations, habitat use, resource selection, monitoring, management, ecosystem services. Project title Moose in Finnmark spatial ecology and management in a changing landscape Year 2016 Project leader Rolf Rødven/Erling Meisingset, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO, changed 1 Aug 2016) Geographical localization of the research project in decimal degrees (max 5 per project, ex. 70,662 N and 23,707 E) 70.144 N, 28.391 E Participants Erling Meisingset, NIBIO Rolf Rødven, UiT Arctic University of Norway Erling J. Solberg, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Rolf Ims, UiT Arctic University of Norway Flagship Terrestrial Funding Source Fram Centre, Regionalt forskningsfond Nord-Norge, Tana kommune, NIBIO Summary of Results The overall purpose of the project is to investigate spatial use of moose in Finnmark, focused on large-scale seasonal movements, and small-scale habitat use and resource selection. The purpose is split into following sub goals: 1. Investigate how seasonal migrations is related to sex and age, and how this is molded by biotic and abiotic factors. 2. Investigate how habitat choice is influenced by vegetation type and interactions with other herbivores. 3. Evaluate if passive sensors like camera traps may represent an alternative to GPS-collaring large ungulates. 4. Establish knowledge on habitat use and migration of moose in Finnmark as a base for future management. As described in the application, the main focus in 2016 has been capturing and marking moose with GPS GSM collars. The fieldwork was carried out the second week of March. We planned to mark 25 individuals, but software problems with some of the GPS collars limited the number. 19 individuals, 4 males and 15 females were successfully captured and equipped with GPS collars (see figure 1 for locations). The moose were tracked by helicopter and darted from the helicopter using a dart-gun (CO 2 -powered rifle; Dan-Inject) with 2.0ml darts containing appr. 8mg Etorfin. The animals age were estimated to be from two year to adults (more than 5 years), and other relevant measures was taken. Capturing caused no significant complications for the animals, neither could we notice deviating movement patterns the subsequent couple of days after capture and release. Capturing

and marking was approved by the Norwegian Environment Agency (Miljødirektoratet) and the Norwegian Animal Research Authority (Forsøksdyrutvalget). Figure 1. Positions of marking sites, March 2016. While most of the moose where captured in the vicinity of Vesterelv and Suki area, the animals started to spread out in April and May, some of them for long distances, to Krampenes and Austertana (see figure 2 for movement patterns). During May and June the spatial distribution was rather aggregated, probably due to calving and postpartum nursing. However, some individuals showed surprisingly high mobility, roaming around large areas of the Varanger peninsula. One individual roamed across the national border into Finland for some weeks, before returning to Norway. In wintertime, moose in Varangerbotn and Vesterelv frequently cause collisions with cars. Hence, managers have promoted culling to reduce collisions. However, preliminary results show that all of the moose marked in Vesterelv moves out of the area before October, when the hunting starts, probably causing culling strategies to be less effective locally. Likewise, preliminary results indicate the Vesterelv area to be a hotspot in wintertime for moose in both Tana, Vadsø and Sør-Varanger, indicating that different culling strategies made by the municipalities may be, in the worst case, antagonistic to each other. Reindeer fences seem not to severely limit movement patterns of moose in wintertime. For movement in summertime this is unclear, and both seasons need more scrutinizing of data. On the other side, with an exception of one individual for three days, there was no crossing of Tana river by any moose before late October. This is surprising, as the river is covered by ice from November/December to April, as well as moose often being observed in proximity of the river. However, whether it is the river or the road/infrastructure that causes this is still unclear.

Figure 2. Track records of the nineteen moose based on positions recorded by the GPS collars, from 9 March to 12 November 2016. Master and PhD-students involved in the project None at the moment, but master projects may be included at a later stage in the project. For the Management The project is strongly focused on management of moose in Finnmark, both regarding novel knowledge on seasonal movement patterns in the northernmost moose population, as well as coherence between seasonal movement patterns and management areas. In addition, the project will provide information on how moose utilize areas infested by geometrid moths, as well as investigating the use of camera traps as a supplement or replacement of GPS collars. Published Results/Planned Publications The project aims to publish three peer reviewed papers: (i) spatial habitat use of moose in an changing ecosystem, (ii) habitat use, resource selection and life history of moose, and (iii) GPS collars versus camera traps methodological comparisons (eg. Journal of Animal Ecology, Journal of Wildlife Management, Wildlife Biology) Communicated Results

The project has established the Facebook page Elg i Finnmark. The page has approximately 350 followers and posts has reached as many as 1300 users. The facebook page is used as two-way communication to answer questions as well as receiving observations, etc. The project has been promoted in both national and local media: Rødven, R., Os, Ø., Rolandsen, C., Madslien, K. & Solberg E.J. Presentation of field work and project on NRK national news *Dagsrevyen, March 2016. Rødven, R. News article, Sagat, March 2016 Rødven, R. News article Finnmarken, September 2016. The project has been presented orally on four meetings: Rødven R & Solberg, E.J. Oral presentations to municipal government, NGO,s and general public. Tana & Nesseby municipalities, March 2016. Rødven, R. Oral presentation, NJFF Finnmark, annual meeting. Nov 2016. Meisingset, E. Elgen i Finnmark: Områdebruk og forvaltning i et landskap i endring (Moose in Finnmark: Space use and management in changing environment). Oral presentation. Naturdatas viltkonferanse. Hell, 04.11.2016. Interdisciplinary Cooperation The project has cooperated with Norwegian Veterinary Institute (VI), represented by Knut Madslien. The project also cooperates with other projects in the area, like COAT and After the pest. We also did imply the latter in open meetings in the municipalities in March. Budget in accordance to results The funding has been used as planned in the application. Could results from the project be subject for any commercial utilization No If Yes There is no commercial utilization planned.

Conclusions The project Moose in Finnmark spatial ecology and management in a changing landscape has successfully captured and equipped 19 moose with GPS/GSM collars in 2016. To our knowledge, this is the northernmost population of moose ever been GPS collared, and may hence provide novel knowledge on spatial use by moose living in the outskirts of their natural habitats. So far the project has reveal that the space use of moose is more extensively than expected, roaming over large distances. The seasonal patterns seem to be like expected, with a spread space use after birth and nursing during summer, as opposed to larger flocks and aggregation during winter. Movement patterns indicate considerably movements across management borders, indicating challenges to local management. The project will continue next year. Due to results from this year we will emphasize marking animals on the western side of Tana river, to investigate spatial use towards Ifjordfjellet and the more continental parts of Finnmark. We plan also to refine the data gathering next year by using GPS collars with cameras. This may increase the resolution of habitat choice of individuals, of particular importance to investigate behavior and habitat choice in moth-infested areas, and to disentangle three dimensional diet selection is such areas. Likewise, such cameras will provide novel information on time of birth and mother/offspring associations.