Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015

Similar documents
2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project INSTRUCTIONS

Temporal and Spatial Variation in Non-motorized Traffic in Minneapolis: Some Preliminary Analyses

LESSONS FROM THE GREEN LANES: EVALUATING PROTECTED BIKE LANES IN THE U.S.

North Coast Corridor:

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

Active Transportation on the Rise

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

2014 Fishers Trail Count

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION MONITORING PROGRAM

Cascade Bicycle Club Strategic Plan

Designing a Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Program in Blacksburg, VA

National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project INSTRUCTIONS

Bike Counter Correlation

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

Marin County. Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program. Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts Update

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Strategic Plan for Active Mobility Phase I: Bicycle Mobility

January Project No

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Source: Transit App. D.C. Dockless Bikeshare: A First Look

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity

Regina Bikeways Needs Assessment Study: Measuring the value of the bikeway infrastructure

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

Bicycle Traffic Count Factoring: An Examination of National, State and Locally Derived Daily Extrapolation Factors

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Cycle journeys on the Anderston-Argyle Street footbridge: a descriptive analysis. Karen McPherson. Glasgow Centre for Population Health

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Open House

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Ben Timerson, MnDOT Erik Minge, SRF Consulting Group Greg Lindsey, University of Minnesota

Pedestrian Activity Criteria. PSAC March 8, 2011

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Active Travel and Exposure to Air Pollution: Implications for Transportation and Land Use Planning

An Assessment of Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Proposed On Street Bikeways

Appendix C. Corridor Spacing Research

Rail Station Fact Sheet DFW Airport North Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

Facilitating Suburban Bike-to-Rail

Pennsylvania Avenue (CR 484) Design Alternatives Study

APPENDIX E Needs Assessment

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

Factors Associated with the Bicycle Commute Use of Newcomers: An analysis of the 70 largest U.S. Cities

Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts in Carson: Results from Automated Counts in Herbie Huff, Madeline Brozen, Norman Wong and Diana Benitez

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Methods and Technologies for Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection NCHRP 7-19

NASHUA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Multimodal Transportation Plan

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Investment in Active Transport Survey

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Measuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility

ORDINANCE NO

Building a bike friendly Chicago

City of Perth Cycle Plan 2029

2017 Florida Commuter Transportation Summit

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Oakville, Ontario Case Study

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Cycle journeys on the South-West City Way: a descriptive analysis. Karen McPherson. Glasgow Centre for Population Health

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project: DESCRIPTION

Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis ( )

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented By: The Inavero Institute September 8, 2009

Bicycle Demand Forecasting for Bloomingdale Trail in Chicago

Performance Metrics: [Making lemonade out of federal and state Requirements]

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction

APPENDIX W OFF-MODEL ADJUSTMENTS

Rail Station Fact Sheet UNT Dallas Station

VGI for mapping change in bike ridership

Chapter 2 Current and Future Conditions

Four Approaches to Starting a Successful Bike / Ped Counting Program

Safer Cycling: How the City of Vancouver is Proactively Improving Cycling Safety

Appendix B: Benefit-Cost Analysis

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

Rail Station Fact Sheet Downtown Carrollton Station

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

2014 peterborough city and county. active. transportation. & health. indicators primer

BEAR CREEK PARK AND RIDE

Transcription:

Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015 Summary Findings: The study showed that Northwest Arkansas (NWA) had relatively high cyclist user counts per capita aggregated across the top three usage sites when compared to cyclist usage aggregated across the top three usage sites in comparison locations 1. In a comparison to cycling levels (when summing the three highest activity sites for each location) per capita (users per 1,000 population), Northwest Arkansas s usage rate (4.45 cyclists/1k population) is very similar to that of San Francisco (4.78 cyclists/1k population), but is below that of Portland (18.89 cyclists/1k population) and of Minneapolis (40.99 cyclists/1k population). Analysis of cyclist counts by time of day when usage is occurring suggested that the trails are primarily being used by cyclists for recreation and not for commuting 2. Additionally, the study showed that natural surface trails have significantly lower usage rates than multi-use paths. Natural surface trails have similar volumes of cyclists on weekends and weekdays suggesting even levels of use throughout the week. Finally, there were higher levels of activity in low-income regions of NWA than have been observed in low-income regions of other comparison locations across the US. Northwest Arkansas also compares favorably to other locations when analyzing pedestrian trail usage. For example, Northwest Arkansas s pedestrian trail usage counts (summed across the three highest pedestrian usage sites for each location) per capita (users per 1,000 population) rate (4.40 pedestrians/1k population) is very similar to that of San Diego County (4.54 pedestrians/1k population), but higher than that of Portland (3.31 pedestrians/1k population). Analysis of pedestrian trail usage counts by time of day when usage is occurring suggested patterns of use similar to what was observed in the cyclist analysis; again the trails are being used for primarily recreational purposes. The relationship between low-income areas and greater pedestrian trail usage was consistent with the cycling trends. Project Overview: The Walton Family Foundation has invested in a multi-use and a natural surface trail network throughout the Northwest Arkansas region. As of January 2015, over 97 miles of connected multi-use trail and close to 36 miles of natural surface trail have been constructed. A user count was conducted by Chen Ryan Associates between April and June of 2015. WFF Evaluation staff analyzed the data to generate greater understanding of local demand for trails. Analysis focused on absolute levels of usage by trail type and site and placed counts in context through comparison to benchmark locations. 1 Comparison cities were chosen by Chen Ryan Associates based on two factors: 1) These locations are recognized as having high levels of resident interest in trail use; and 2) Data collection had already occurred in these locations using a similar methodology across multiple sites. Note: Researchers did not report the months of the year when the trail counts were conducted for comparison locations. 2 Note: Only 2 count sites (out of 53) in the study were on-street, which may have contributed to the lower cyclist commuting numbers. 1

Methodology: Given the budget and objectives associated with the Northwest Arkansas Trail Monitoring project, the research team selected the following technologies: 24-hour Continuous Active Infrared counters (or Pyros), and 24-hour Continuous Pneumatic Tubes. 24-hour continuous pyro counters were used to count pedestrian and bicycle activity combined without distinction of mode. Additionally, a combination of 24-hour continuous pyro counters and 24-hour continuous pneumatic tubes was used to count bicycle and pedestrian activity (which is calculated by subtracting bicycle counts collected via the pneumatic tubes from all activity collected via the infrared pyro counters). Key criteria used to guide the siting of bicycle and pedestrian count stations across the Northwest Arkansas region included: 1) presence of existing trail facilities; 2) achieving a representative sample of locations in relation to population density, employment density, and median household income; and 3) an even geographic distribution of count sites across the 133-mile system. Key Findings: Cyclists The findings indicate that Northwest Arkansas has noteworthy cycling levels. Northwest Arkansas compares favorably to other regions, some of which are considered cycling-prominent cities such as Portland and San Francisco. Comparing cycling levels (summing the three highest activity sites by average daily bicycle volume for each location) per capita (users per 1,000 population), Northwest Arkansas (4.45) is very similar to San Francisco (4.78), trailing only Portland (18.89) and Minneapolis (40.99). Table 1: Daily Volume of Cyclists per 1,000 Population (user counts reflect top three locations combined) County (Rank) Population Daily Cyclists* Cyclists/1K Minneapolis 3 (1) 407,207 16,690 40.99 Portland (2) 619,360 11,700 18.89 San Francisco (3) 852,469 4,074 4.78 NWA (4) 491,966 2,191 4.45 Maricopa County (5) 4,087,191 3,292 0.81 San Diego County (6) 3,263,431 1,800 0.55 *Daily cyclists determined by combining the usage of the top three sites with the highest average daily bicycle volume for each location. The study estimated that an average of 67,728 annual cyclists per site are anticipated across the Northwest Arkansas system, with a median of 57,859 bicyclists and a standard deviation of 56,382. The Scull Creek Trail showed the highest average daily multi-use path weekend and weekday bicycle counts, at 759 cyclists and 479 cyclists per day, respectively. The Seed Tick Shuffle Trail showed the highest 3 These numbers not seasonally adjusted 2

average daily weekend and weekday bicycle counts for natural surface trails, at 39 cyclists and 68 cyclists per day, respectively. Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for Estimated Annual Bicycle Counts Daily per Site Statistic System wide Multi-Use Paths Natural Surface Trails Mean Estimated Annual Cyclists per Count Site 67,728 84,807 7,006 Median Estimated Annual Cyclists per Count Site 57,859 70,292 5,706 Standard Deviation (annual per site) 56,382 52,184 5,237 Minimum Estimated Annual Cyclists per Site 1,449 4,634 1,499 Maximum Estimated Annual Cyclists per Site 201,035 201,035 17,142 Source: Chen Ryan Associates, August 2015 Figure 1: Estimated Annual Bicycle Volumes by Location in Northwest Arkansas The low cyclist volumes observed on weekday mornings, combined with peak use in the late afternoon and early evening (usage counts by time of day when usage is occurring), suggest that the NWA trails are primarily used for recreational purposes rather than utilitarian purposes, such as work or school commute trips. The highest average hourly weekday bicycle volume (usage counts by time of day when usage is occurring) occurred at 6:00PM, with 22 cyclists on average (across all sites) per site per hour. The highest average hourly weekend bicycle volume (usage counts by time of day when usage is occurring) occurred at 2:00PM, with 36 cyclists on average (across all sites) per site per hour. The times 3

of day when multi-use paths were used with greater frequency were in the evening hours on weekdays peaking at 7:00PM and peaking at 3:00PM on the weekends. However, natural surface trails usage peaked at 4:00PM on both weekdays and weekends. The research showed the natural surface trails have significantly lower usage rates than multi-use paths. However, natural surface trails have similar volume on weekends and weekdays suggesting even use throughout the week. Figure 2: Average Northwest Arkansas Daily Bicycle Volume by Day of Week and Trail Surface Type (across all sites) 200 180 Average Daily Volume (# of cyclists) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Natural-Surface Trails Multi-Use Paths Bicycle volumes appear to be related to levels of income, population density, and employment density. Count sites located in strata characterized by high population and employment density showed higher rates of cycling than sites located in strata characterized by low population and employment density. High population density sites averaged 341 daily riders while low population density sites averaged 83 riders daily. Count sites situated in high-income strata recorded lower bicycle volumes than those located in low-income strata during both the weekend and weekday periods. High-income sites averaged 97 riders during the week and 187 on the weekend, while sites in low-income strata averaged 213 during the week and 417 on the weekend. In sum, higher bicycle trail usage is associated with higher densities of employment and population; but not with higher income levels. Pedestrians Pedestrian use of the trails, much like the cycling usage, was determined by the researchers to be comparable with other notable pedestrian friendly cities around the country. The study estimated that an average of 58,953 annual pedestrians per site are anticipated across the system, with a median of 30,270 pedestrians and a standard deviation of 72,078. 4

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for Estimated Annual Pedestrian Counts Daily per Site Statistic System wide Multi-Use Paths Natural Surface Trails Mean Estimated Annual Pedestrians per Count Site Median Estimated Annual Pedestrians per Count Site 58,953 72,420 10,134 30,270 43,807 8,876 Standard Deviation (annual per site) 72,078 76,185 5,163 Minimum Estimated Annual Pedestrians per Site 4,407 5,436 4,407 Maximum Estimated Annual Pedestrians per Site 291,836 291,836 19,593 Source: Chen Ryan Associates, August 2015 Northwest Arkansas compares favorably to other regions (in pedestrian usage of trails), some of which are considered pedestrian-prominent cities such as Portland and San Diego County. Comparing pedestrian trail user rates (summed across the three highest pedestrian usage sites by average daily pedestrian volume) per capita (users per 1,000 population), Northwest Arkansas (4.40) is very similar to San Diego County (4.54) and higher than Portland (3.31). Table 4: Daily Volume of Pedestrians per 1,000 Population (user counts reflect top three locations combined) County (Rank) Population Daily Pedestrians* Pedestrians/1K Minneapolis 4 (1) 407,207 60,020 147.39 San Francisco (2) 852,469 17,209 20.19 San Diego County (3) 3,236,431 14,807 4.54 NWA (4) 491,966 2,164 4.40 Portland (5) 619,360 2,048 3.31 *Daily pedestrians determined by combining the usage of the top three sites with the highest average daily bicycle volume for each location. 4 These numbers not seasonally adjusted. 5

Figure 3: Estimated Annual Pedestrian Volumes by Location in Northwest Arkansas The Frisco Trail showed the highest average daily weekday pedestrian count (833), and the Crystal Bridges Trail showed the second highest average daily weekday pedestrian count (738). The Crystal Bridges Trail saw the highest average daily weekend pedestrian count of all trails (826). The highest average weekday pedestrian volume (usage counts by time of day when usage is occurring) was found to be at 6:00PM (35 pedestrians on average per site per hour). The highest weekend pedestrian volume (usage counts by time of day when usage is occurring) occurred at 2:00PM (43 pedestrians on average per site per hour). Similarly to the cycling patterns, the low volumes during weekday mornings, as well as the high volumes in late afternoon and evening suggest use is primarily recreational. The Trail Usage Monitoring project established a best practice bicycle and pedestrian data collection program for the Northwest Arkansas region. The research team recommended that Northwest Arkansas continue tracking cycling and pedestrian trends over time to support improved understandings of the benefits of cycling and pedestrian infrastructure and programmatic investments. 6