Highway Engineering, second edition: Martin Rogers 2008 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Similar documents
City of Graz Gentle Mobiliy & Space for People. Gerhard Ablasser

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

City of Graz Gentle Mobiliy & Space for People. Gerhard Ablasser

Previous Transit Studies MTTF MEETING #

SUMP of Ravenna: relevant experiences on travel behavior change

Healthy and Environmental Friendly Transport in the City Region

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Chelmsford City Growth Package

Urban Traffic Analysis Using HSL (Helsinki Bus) Dataset Kai Zhao University of Helsinki

UNIT V 1. What are the traffic management measures? [N/D-13] 2. What is Transportation System Management (TSM)? [N/D-14]

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

Bristol City Council has produced a draft Bristol Transport Strategy document.

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

Municipality of Sofia Traffic Master Plan. Intelligent Transport Systems Strategy Andrew Walsh

Parallel Workshop: Avoid

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

EUROPEAN MOBILITY WEEK September 2015

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

High frequency bus services operating to Little Island; Creation of a new Park and Ride site and train station at North Esk;

REYKJAVÍK - NEW MOBILITY OPTIONS

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Canada s Capital Region Delegation to the Velo-City Global 2010 Conference

Sustainable Transport Blueprint for Canterbury. Lynn Sloman

9. Parking Supporting Statement

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

National Transport Awards Cambridge Park & Ride

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

Aurora Corridor to E Line

NORTH YORK CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Scheduling 101 Calculating Running Time Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Multimodal Operations Workshop Houston, TX

BELFAST ON THE MOVE Transport Masterplan for Belfast City Centre

This objective implies that all population groups should find walking appealing, and that it is made easier for them to walk more on a daily basis.

A VISION... A city where it s normal for everyone to travel more sustainably every day, and the culture of sustainable travel is celebrated.

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

Centennial Neighbourhoods Transportation Management Plan Summary of Phase 1 Consultation. Overview of Issues

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

DUNDAS WEST-BLOOR Mobility Hub Profile

The Economic Principles in Transportation Planning

Alternatives Public Workshop

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

Roadways. Roadways III.

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Copenhagen Cycling Map. Red Lines Cycling facilities

Cycling in the Netherlands The City and the region Utrecht

New Seward and 36 th Avenue Intersection Conceptual Design

Wellington Public Transport Spine Study

Cities Connect. Cities Connect! How Urbanity Supports Social Inclusion

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

The Belgian experience An actual view on mobility policy towards workplaces in Flanders (Belgium)

Most Important Part of any Plan

No-car lanes in Tyneside results from modelling and stakeholder analysis

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Developing a Birmingham Transport Space Allocation policy. David Harris Transport Policy Manager Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council

Global Fuel Economy Initiative

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

CITY PLANNING ADMINISTRATION. The walkable city. Michael Erman, City of Stockholm Vienna/CORP 2012, 15 May 2012

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Insert the title of your presentation here

Introduction. Bus priority system. Objectives. Description. Measure title: City: Malmo Project: SMILE Measure number: 12.7

City of Melville. Canning Bridge Structure Plan Integrated Transport Strategy. August 2014

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

Presentation to the City of Ottawa Transit Commission. February 20, 2013

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Executive Board 4 July Transport Strategy - Future Public Transport Requirements

Comprehensive strategies to manage mobility and reduce air pollution

1. Provide a dedicated westbound approach bus lane at the intersection;

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

5.4 Other Transportation

Chapter 4 Transportation Strategies to Support Growth

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012

June 2015 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SNAPSHOT

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR EXISTING AND PLANNED SECTIONS OF US 19

Development, transport and traffic management in Copenhagen

Gdynia s bicycle model

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Amendments to Essex Highway Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Policy and Standards April 2008

Walking the Talk: Sustainable Transport and Urban Design in Four New Zealand Cities

Bluffdale South (SR140) Bicycle/Shoulder Lanes Project Type Bicycle

MOBILITY CHALLENGES IN HILL CITIES

Long Term Strategies to reduce car dependency

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

City of Szekesfehervar. Royal traditions Dominant economic role 1000 years of mobility

TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY The Toronto Experience

A MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT SOLUTION FOR MALE, MALDIVES

West Village Mobility & Integration

Application of SUTI in Colombo (Western Region)

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Uniting Cleveland through the Euclid Corridor Transportation Project

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

Bike share success factors

RACQ SUBMISSION ON DRAFT BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL TRANSPORT PLAN FOR BRISBANE The Royal Automobile Club of Queensland Limited

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

Sustainable Transport in Vienna

Dipl.-Ing. Thomas FISCHER Reggio Emilia, 22. October 2010

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Transcription:

Question 2.1 Office workers within a residential development have a choice of the following work destinations: Urban Centre A, 150 minutes travel time away, with 7 million m 2 of office space Urban Centre B, 60 minutes travel time away, with 1 million m 2 of office space Local shopping area, 12 minutes travel time away with 0.15 million m 2 of office space The Gravity Model is to be utilized to determine the distribution of trips between the 3 destinations. The level of attraction to workers is based on the quantity of office space available within each destination If 10,000 office-worker journeys are generated by inhabitants within the residential development, distribute them between the 3 destinations (Friction factor = 1.0t -2 ).

Solution 2.1 P=10000 A=1.0 b=-2 Zone Aj t F AF AF/ AF T Urban A 7000000 150 4.44444E-05 311.1111 0.190801 1908 Urban B 1000000 60 0.000277778 277.7778 0.170358 1704 Res 150000 12 0.006944444 1041.667 0.638842 6388 1630.556 1 10000

Question 2.2 (a) Travel time for buses between Zone A and Zone B is set at 15 minutes, with the travel time for cars set at 8 minutes. Use the MNL formula Um = am 0.22 tij Where acar = 0.0 abus = -0.9 Determine modal split for the bus and car (b) If the construction of a priority bus corridor between Zone A and Zone B reduces the travel time for buses to 6 minutes, estimate the new modal split.

Solution 2.1 (a) Ucar = 0.0 (0.2 8) = -1.6 Ubus = -0.9 (0.2 15) = -3.9 Car share = e -1.6 (e -1.6 + e -3.9 ) = 0.202 / (0.202 + 0.02) = 0.91 Bus share = e -3.9 (e -1.6 + e -3.9 ) = 0.02 / (0.202 + 0.02) = 0.09 (b) Ucar = 0.0 (0.2 8) = -1.6 Ubus = -0.9 (0.2 6) = -2.1 Car share = e -1.6 (e -1.6 + e -2.1 ) = 0.202 / (0.202 + 0.122) = 0.62 Bus share = e -2.1 (e -1.6 + e -2.1 ) = 0.122 / (0.202 + 0.122) = 0.38 Introduction of bus lane increases modal share of bus by a factor of 4.2.

Question 2.3 During the peak morning hour, a bus lane runs a service from a satellite town into the city centre, with an average headway of 2 minutes. Each bus has a capacity of 90 passengers, and each vehicle is on average at 90% capacity. Each bus commuter lives on average 5 minutes walk from their bus stop. Having disembarked, bus commuters walk on average 10 minutes to their place of work. The bus would take 12 minutes to travel from origin to destination if it did not stop. Picking up passengers, however, adds 6 minutes to the total journey time. The bus fare is 0.5 Euro For commuters traveling by car, in-car traveling time totals 25 minutes, with available parking on average 5 minutes walk from the workplace. Daily car parking costs Euro 10, Petrol costs per journey averages 2 Euro. The utility of each mode is estimated using the following formula: Um = am - 0.2 time IN VEHICLE - 0.5 time out of VEHICL E - 0.1 time TRAVEL EXPENSES Where am = 1 for car travel and 0 for bus travel Each car carries 1.4 persons. Estimate the number of bus and car commuters traveling from the satellite town to the city centre

Solution 2.3 UBUS = 1 0.2 (18) 0.3 (5+1+10) 0.1 (0.5) = 1-3.6-4.8-0.5 = -7.9 UCAR = 1 0.2 (25) 0.3 (5) 0.1 (10/2 + 2) = 1-5 - 1.5-0.7 = - 6.2 Bus share = e -7.9 (e -4.2 + e -7.9 ) = 0.000371 / (0.002 + 0.000371) = 0.16 Car share = e -1.6 (e -1.6 + e -2.1 ) = 0.002 / (0.002 + 0.000371) = 0.84 Bus commuters = 30*90*0.9 = 2430 = 16% Therefore car number = 2430 84 16 = 12757.5 Assuming 1.4 persons by car Total number form the town traveling to city centre by car = 12757.5*1.4 = 17861

Question 2.4 Two alternative peak-time routes exist between 2 localities within an urban area: The time required to take the first route is estimated using the following formula: T(route 1) = 2.1 + 0.6 x1 x1 = volume of traffic flow along route 1 in 000 of vehicles T(route 2) = 4.1 + 0.3 x2 x2 = volume of traffic flow along route 2 in 000 of vehicles. The total flow between the 2 urban areas is 4000 vehicles per hour during the peak. Estimate the equilibrium flows during the peak, together with the time of travel along the 2 routes

Solution 2.4 X1 + X2 = 4 X2 = 4 - X1 2.1 + 0.6 X1 = 4.1 + 0.3 X (4 - X1) 0.6 X1 = 4.1-2.1 + 1.2 0.3 X1 0.9 X1 = 4.1-2.1 + 1.2 X1 = 3.555 X2 = 0.445 Therefore, at equilibrium, during peak hour, 3555 vehicles use route 1, with 445 vehicles using route 2.

Question 2.5 Two alternative routes connect the city centre to a residential suburb. The performance function for the two routes are as follows t1 = 6 + 3x1 t2 = 4 + 4.5(x2) 2 t1, t2 are the mean travel times on routes 1 and 2 x1, x2 are the traffic volumes on routes 1 and 2 in 000 s of vehicles per hour The total number of combined vehicles travelling along the two routes towards the city during the peak is 5000 vehicles Estimate the equilibrium travel times for each route and the volume of cars utilising each

Solution 2.5 6+3(5-X2)=4+4.5(X2) 2 X1+X2=5 4.5(X2) 2 + 3X 2 17 = 0 A=4.5 B=3 C=-17 X2=(-3+/-17.74)/9 X1=3.361 (3361 cars on route 1) X2=1.639 (1639 cars on route 2) Equilibrium time=16.08 minutes

Question 2.6 The following is a diagram for a transport network: 1 3 5 2 4 6 The minimum paths are given below in Table Q2.5.1 Origin zone Destination zone 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1-2 1-3 1-2-4 1-3-5 1-3-4-6 2 2-1 2-1 2-4 2-1-3 2-4-6 3 3-1 3-1-2 3-4 3-5 3-4-6 4 4-2-1 4-2 4-3 4-3-5 4-6 5 5-3-1 5-3-1-2 5-3 5-3-4 5-6 6 6-4-3-1 6-4-2 6-4-3 6-4 6-5 Table Q2.5.1 If zone-to-zone trip interchanges are as given in Table Q2.5.2 below, calculate the flows on each link of the network. Origin zone Destination zone 1 2 3 4 5 6 1-300 600 300 220 130 2 500-250 600 130 290 3 500 350-750 540 410 4 100 600 500-290 440 5 400 200 750 240-420 6 200 550 400 330 330 - Table Q2.5.2

Solution 2.6 1-2, 2-1=2130 1-3, 3-1=2980 2-4, 4-2=2440 3-4, 4-3=2920 3-5, 5-3=2770 4-6, 6-4=2550 5-6, 6-5=750