Thermal mark patterns Applied to Salmon from Alaska, Washington and Oregon for Brood Year 1999 and Some Proposed Marks for Brood Year 2000

Similar documents
NPAFC Doc Rev. 1 Rev. Date: Oct. 17, 2013

Marked Salmon Production by the Hatcheries of Russia in Elena Akinicheva, Vladimir Volobuev, Evgeny Fomin

Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery

Alaska Finfish Aquaculture

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DIVISION OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS RELEASE

Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe

Hood Canal Steelhead Project A conservation hatchery experiment. Joy Lee Waltermire

Medvejie Chinook Releases by Stock by Brood Year. Medvejie Chinook Releases Brood Year

Fishery Management Report No Alaska Salmon Enhancement Program 2009 Annual Report

RELEASES AND RECOVERIES OF U.S. SALMONID DATA STORAGE TAGS, AND RECOVERIES OF HIGH SEAS TAGS IN NORTH AMERICA, 2001

Reproductive success of hatchery chinook salmon in the Deschutes River, Washington

June 3, 2014 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. Stacy Horton, Policy Analyst, Washington. SUBJECT: Final 2012 Hatchery Fin Clip Report

Strategies for mitigating ecological effects of hatchery programs


ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DIVISION OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS RELEASE

RELEASES OF HIGH-SEAS SALMON TAGS BY U.S. VESSELS IN 2006

Cushman Hydro Project Public Meeting. Cushman Fire Hall Dec. 6, 2018

Early Marine Migrations. General geography Four general patterns Influence of genetics

Incidence of Thermally Marked Pink and Chum Salmon in the Coastal Waters of the Gulf of laska. Edward V. Farley, Jr.

ANNUAL REPORT SALMON HATCHERY

Press Release New Bilateral Agreement May 22, 2008

Recent Environmental Conditions and BC Salmon Outlook to 2020

Wetland Recovery and Salmon Population Resilience: A Case Study in Estuary Ecosystem Restoration

Salmon age and size at maturity: Patterns and processes

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

NSRAA ADULT RETURNS 2017 & 2018 FORECAST. Steve Reifenstuhl & Chip Blair November 2017

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

Fish Tech Weekly Outline January 14-18

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DIVISION OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS RELEASE

A Method for Utilizing Recent Coded Wire Tag Recovery Data to Adjust FRAM Base Period Exploitation Rates

Stock Assessment of Anadromous Salmonids, 2003 Report Number: OPSW-ODFW

for Salmon and Watersheds

MEMORANDUM. Joan Dukes, NPCC. Michele DeHart. DATE: August 5, Data Request

Southeast Sustainable Salmon Fund Project Statement of Work

Rivers Inlet Salmon Initiative

Chinook Salmon Transfers by WDF. A long history of genotypic mixing raises questions about current policy

The Salmonid Species. The Salmonid Species. Definitions of Salmonid Clans. The Salmonid Species

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FISH RESEARCH PROJECT OREGON. PROJECT TITLE: Spring Chinook Salmon in the Willamette and Sandy Rivers

INCIDENCE OF CODED-WIRE TAGGED SALMONIDS IN COMMERCIAL CATCHES IN THE NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN AND BERING SEA,

Summary of HSRG Findings for Chum Populations in the Lower Columbia River and Gorge

High Seas CWT Recoveries in 2012 and 2013

Copper River Commercial Salmon Fishery Management. Dan Ashe and Bert Lewis

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project

Smolt Monitoring Protocol at COE Dams On the Lower Snake and Lower Columbia rivers

2017/2018 Salmon Fishery Planning

Chilkat Taku Stikine Unuk. 15 Years of Troll Contribution and Escapement History

Joint Columbia River Management Staff

Hatchery Reform and our Pacific Region National Fish Hatcheries. Presented by Doug Olson

Addressing Critical Uncertainties in the Reintroduction of Chum Salmon to Oregon Tributaries of the Columbia River. Kris Homel

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

Joint Columbia River Management Staff

Attachment 1. Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND

The Role of the NPAFC in Conservation and Protection of Pacific Salmon

Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries: 2013 and Beyond

Salmon Enhancement Program

Investigating Juvenile Life History and Maternal Run Timing of Chehalis River Spring and Fall Chinook Salmon using Otolith Chemistry

Employer Name: NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center

Work Completed for Compliance With the Biological Opinion for Hatchery Programs in the Willamette Basin, USACE funding: 2003

THE OREGON. PLAN for Salmon and Watersheds. Stock Assessment of Anadromous Salmonids, Report Number: OPSW-ODFW

Status Determination Criteria for Willapa Bay Natural Coho. Salmon Technical Team and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

Marine Survival of Puget Sound Chinook salmon- New studies on size-selective mortality and critical growth periods

English Bay Lakes AKSSF Completion Report

Steelhead Overview and Catch Statistics

Yakima River Basin Coho Reintroduction Feasibility Study

Mass Marking and Management of Great Lakes Fisheries

18 March 2016 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

PRE-SEASON PLANNING FOR FRASER SALMON and STOCKS OF CONCERN. Forum on Conservation and Harvest Planning for Fraser Salmon January 22, 2010

Wild & Hatchery Salmon Interactions Model. Pete Rand & Bob Lessard

COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PUGET SOUND CHINOOK: HARVEST MANAGEMENT COMPONENT. Puget Sound Indian Tribes. And

COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD HARVEST 1980 TO by John McKern for The Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association

Seaward Migration. To go or not to go? Timing Locomotion Life history patterns Environmental changes. Chinook salmon smolt

Conditions affecting the 2011 and 2012 Fall Chinook Adult Returns to Spring Creek National Fish Hatchery.

April 30, Mr. Steve Devitt Moody Marine, Ltd. 28 Fleming Drive Halifax, Nova Scotia B3P1A9, Canada

2007 Adult Returns and 2008 Expectations Columbia River

2017 PRE-SEASON EXPECTATIONS: 2017 OBSERVATIONS TO DATE:

2016 Fraser River Stock Assessment and Fishery Summary Chinook, Coho and Chum

Job Performance Report, Project F-73-R-9 Subproject II: SALMON AND STEELHEAD INVESTIGATIONS Study I: Salmon Spawning Ground Surveys

Report on Science Center Activities

2016 Fraser River Chinook Key Information for Management. FN Forum March 8-10 Nanaimo, BC

Brian Missildine Natural Resource Scientist Hatchery Evaluation and Assessment Team Lead Washington-British Columbia Annual General Meeting Kelowna,

Juvenile chum migration patterns in the lower Columbia River and estuary

Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager

NATIVE FISH CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE SPRING CHINOOK SALMON ROGUE SPECIES MANAGEMENT UNIT

Alaska Salmon Research and Data Inventory

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DIVISION OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS RELEASE

EVALUATION OF FALL CHINOOK AND CHUM SALMON SPAWNING BELOW BONNEVILLE DAM

Alaska s Salmon Fishery Management - 50 Years of Sustainability -

2008 Adult Returns and 2009 Expectations Columbia River

Acclimation Strategies Improve Post-release Performance of Hatchery Salmon and Steelhead in Northeast Oregon By

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: Inland Fisheries - Hatchery Management

2002 Post Season Fishing and Hunting Report. Report to the Point No Point Treaty Council

Patterns of migration and delay observed in Summer Steelhead from the Upper Columbia and Snake River Basins from PIT tag data

Chinook salmon (photo by Roger Tabor)

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FISH RESEARCH PROJECT OREGON. PROJECT TITLE: Spring Chinook Salmon in the Willamette and Sandy Rivers

We recommend that whenever possible you use the following guidelines for choosing the most sustainable options in 2010.

CHAPTER 2 - THE COQUILLE FISHERY

TAG RETURNS AN]) RELEASES IN UNITED STATES HIGH-SEAS SALMON TAGGING

R0204-NPAFC Salmon Tagging Progress Report: July 1, 2005

Declining patterns of Pacific Northwest steelhead trout spawner abundance and marine survival

Trends in salmon fisheries

Transcription:

NPAFC Doc. No. 463 Rev. No._1_ Thermal mark patterns Applied to Salmon from Alaska, Washington and Oregon for Brood Year 1999 and Some Proposed Marks for Brood Year 2000 Peter Hagen Harold J. Geiger Alaska Department of Fish and Game P.O. Box 25526 Juneau, Alaska 99821-5526 Eric Volk Jeff Grimm Washington Dept of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way N. Olympia, WA 98501 Submitted to the NORTH PACIFIC ANADROMOUS FISH COMMISSION By The United States Party October 2000 This paper may be cited in the following manner: Hagen, P., H.J. Geiger, E.C. Yolk, and J.J. Grimm. 2000. Thennal mark patterns Applied to Salmon from Alaska, Washington and Oregon for Brood Year 1999 and Some Proposed Marks for Brood Year 2000.8 p. Alaska Dept. Fish and Game, Juneau Alaska. 99801-5526

Abstract In the States of Washington and Alaska, mass marking salmon through the method of otolith thermal marking is proving to be an effective research and management tool in a variety of situations. However the specific needs and applications for marking are not same in each state. This document contains a report of thermal mark patterns applied to salmon stocks from the 1999 brood year. It includes release numbers where known and mark patterns applied in Alaska, Washington, Oregon and by Treaty Tribes Summary of Alaska thermal marking programs In Alaska, the primary use of thermal marking is to provide information about the contribution of hatchery fish, primarily pink, chum and sockeye, to commercial and costrecovery fisheries during the summer fishing season. Several on-going programs use this information as an aid to the in-season management of mixed stock fisheries and hatcheries use the information to evaluate the success of various release strategies. In research applications, thermal marks have been used to answer questions regarding lake survival and to provide information on straying rates of returning adults. In addition the presence of otolith thermal marks is being used to determine the origin of juvenile and immature salmon obtained in high seas collections. In many instances thermal marks are being applied in hatcheries without a directed sampling program in place. The reasons vary but it is primarily done in situations where the marks cost little to apply and there is an anticipation that a sampling program maybe put together by the time the fish return. Thermal mark patterns are assigned annually by the Alaska Department offish and Game with consideration based on the constraints of the hatchery, management needs to identify those stocks and presence of a funded program to recover the thermal patterns. Thermal marking is expected to expand in the next couple of years and there is increasing difficulties in apply unique thermal patterns. A list of thermal marks applied to hatchery reared salmon in Brood Year 1999 is shown in Table 1. The number released to date is over 900 million from 49 different marking groups. Included is the first strontium mark fish released by GuIkana Hatchery as part of a new program. The otolith pattern is presented both as the Rbr notation (Munk and Geiger 1998 ) with slight modifications by Hagen (1999) as well as the equivalent Hatch Notation. The Hatch Notation is similar to the RBr code in that thermal rings are considered to be grouped into bands of rings that are evenly spaced. The primary difference is that the hatch event is denoted with an 'H' and the position in the code indicates what rings are formed pre or post hatch. Both notations are shown in the tables as well as graphic representation of the mark. Information regarding thermal marked patterns and numbers of released fish in Alaska is available from the Alaska Dept. offish and Game's Coded Wire Tag and Otolith Processing Laboratory database 2

For the marks applied to the 2000 brood stock, the intention in Alaska is to apply similar patterns as in previous years. There is slight increase in the number of hatcheries applying thennal marks, though at this point the pattern that will be laid down by all facilities have not been evaluated. Effort is being made to avoid duplicate marks where possible. Summary of Washington, Oregon and Treaty Tribe thermal marking programs In Washington State, mass-marking of hatchery salmon with thennally-induced otolith marks (Volk et al., 1994) is primarily focussed on evaluating the success of hatchery supplementation efforts associated with declining stocks and to answer a number of specific research questions where identification of hatchery fish at various life history stages is important. Otolith marks have also been employed to evaluate stray rates, select adults for spawning in mixed-stock hatchery spawning aggregations and as an aid to preseason and in-season management of fisheries. A summary ofthennal marks applied to the 1998 brood year from Washington State is provided in NP AFC document 445 (table 3). Table 2 in this report provides a Summary of marks applied to the 1999 brood year releases from Washington State. Table 3 contains a summary of marks applied by Treaty tribe hatcheries in Washington, while table 4 contains a preliminary report of marks applied to hatchery stocks in Oregon State. Because emphasis on otolith thennal marking in these programs are generally focussed upon identification of many groups within a stock rather than mixed fisheries with potential contributions from many hatcheries, marks are often redundant between hatchery stocks. In addition, due to constraints in some facilities, temperature changes may take place during the hatching period and the location of the hatch event in the mark may be variable. Marking of brood year 2000 fish is expected to be similar in scope to that reported above. References Munk K.M.and Geiger, H.J. 1998. Thermal Marking of Otoliths: the "RBr" Coding Structure ofthennal Marks (NPAFC Doc. 367). Alaska Department offish and Game, Juneau Alaska 99801-5526 19p. Hagen, P. 1999. A modeling approach to address the underlying structure and constraints ofthennal mark codes and code notation. (NPAFC Doc. 395). 12p. Alaska Dept. Fish and Game, Juneau Alaska. 99801-5526 Hagen, P., H.J. Geiger, E.C. Yolk, and J.1. Grimm. 1999. Releases of Thennally Marked Salmon from Alaska and Washington in 1999. (NPAFC Doc. 445). 6 p. Alaska Dept. Fish and Game, Juneau Alaska. 99801-5526 3

Table 1. Summary ofthennal mark codes applied to the 1999 brood year hatchery salmon in Alaska. STATE! Bm!IH~1; BI;!:ZIQH BI;LI:ASI; AGENCY EA~ILIn: s A1 TM 1999 2001 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHCENTRAL CIM TRAIL lakes BEARLK A2 TM 1999 2000 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHCENTRAL CIM TRAIL lakes HIDDEN lk 244 30 A3 TM 1999 2001 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHCENTRAL CIM TRAIL lakes BEAR CR 231-30 A4 TM 1999 2000 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHCENTRAL CIM TRAIL lakes BEARlK AS TM 1999 2000 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHCENTRAL CIM TRAIL lakes BIGlK AS TM 1999 2000 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHCENTRAL PGHC PORT GRAHAM A7 TM 1999 2001 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHCENTRAL PWSA MAIN BAY MAIN BAY AS SM 1999 2000 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHCENTRAl PWSA GUlKANA A9 TM 1999 2000 01-Jun-OO SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM SNETTISHAM A10 TM 1999 2000 27 -May-OO SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM S-TAHlTAN lake A11 TM 1999 2000 26-Jun-OO SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM S-TAHlTAN lake A12 TM 1999 2000 01-Jun-OO SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM S-TATSAMENIE lake A13 TM 1999 2001 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM SNETTISHAM A14 TM 1999 2001 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM SNETTISHAM A15 TM 1999 2001 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM SNETTISHAM A16 TM 1999 2001 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM SNETTISHAM A17 TM 1999 2000 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST DIPC SNETTISHAM CHllKAT lk 115-32 A18 TM 1999 2000 18-May-OO SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST PWHA KLAVIIOCK RIVER KLAVIIOCK lk A19 TM 1999 2000 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST SSRA BURNETT INlET HUGH SMITH lk 101-30 A20 TM 1999 2000 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST SSRA BURNETT INLET HUGH SMITH lk 101-30 A21 AD+CWT+TM 1999 2001 SOCKEYE AK SOUTHEAST SSRA BURNETT INLET MCDONALD lake TOTAL Pre-hatch PostHatch MiI!:lsHilml IA!:Z~ Y!~I!:ZI:II L~H!:ZII::I B~'=IiAS~Q B~[,2Sl1 l:iillsi!j C2Sl1!:Z[i!(!!JI,!;Z[i!(!!JI, BearlK99Sock SMOlT 1:1.6 6H 111111 HiddenlK99Sock FRY 1:1.4,2.2 4,2H 1111 II TustlK99Sock SMOlT 2:1.3,2.3 H3,3 III III BearlK99Sock(fIy) FRY 1:1.3 3H III A5 BiglK99Sock FRY 1:1.3,2.2 3,2H 11111 A6 EnglishBay99Sock FRY 1:1.5,2.2 5,2H 1111111 A7 MainBay99 SMOlT 1:1.3,2.2 3,2H 11111 A8 Gulkana99 FRY 24000000 NA NA STRONTIUM MARK A9 SWT99 FRY 0.15 520778 1:1.5,2.3n 5,3nH 11111 m A10 Tahltan99 FRY 0.13 22283392:1.6 H6 111111 A11 Tuya99 FRY 0.12 866530 2: 1.4 H4 1111 A12 Tats99 FRY 0.15 350139 2:1.5 H5 11111 A13 Snett99ES SMOlT 1500000 1:1.4,2.4 4,4H 11111111 Early-Small A14 Snett99El SMOlT 1500000 1:1.3,2.3n 3,3nH III NI Early - large A15 Snett99lS SMOlT 15OOO001:1.4,2.3n 4,3nH 11111 NI late- Small At6 Snett99ll SMOlT 1500000 1:1.3,2.4n 3,4nH 11111 m late -large A17 Chilkat99 FRY 2500000 1:1.5,2.4n 5,4nH 11111 m A18 KJawock99 FEED FRY 0.25 28 335061 1:1.5 5H 11111 A19 HughSmith99(Early) FRY 1:1.2,2.2,3.2 2,2,2H II II II Early A20 HughSmith99(late) FRY 1: 1.2, 2.2,3.2 2,2,3H II II III late A21 Necklake99 SMOlT 1:1.3.2.3n 3.3nH III III 4

Table 1 (continued). Summary of thermal mark codes applied to the 1999 brood year hatchery salmon in Alaska SPECIES: PINK BROOD RELEASE DATE LAST STATEI REGION 10# MARK TYPE YEAR YEAR RELEASED SPECIES PROVINCE RELEASE AGENCY FACILITY STOCK A22 TM 1999 2000 PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PGHC PORT GRAHAM PORT GRAHAM A23 TM 1999 2000 17-May-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PNSA AFKOERNIG AFKOERNIG A24 TM 1999 2000 24-May-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PNSA AFKOERNIG AFKOERNIG A25 TM 1999 2000 04-May-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PNSA AFKOERNIG AFKOERNIG A26 TM 1999 2000 08-Jun-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PNSA CANNERY CREEK CANNERYCR A27 TM 1999 2000 08-Jun-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PNSA CANNERY CREEK CANNERYCR A28 1M 1999 2000 08-Jun-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PNSA CANNERY CREEK CANNERYCR A29 TM 1999 2000 19-May-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PNSA WALLY NOERENBERG WALLY NOERENBERG A30 TM 1999 2000 16-May-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL PNSA WALLY NOERENBERG WALLY NOERENBERG A31 TM 1999 2000 12-May-OO PINK AK SOUTHCENTRAL VFDA SOLOMON GULCH SOLOMON GULCH 221-60 A32 1M 1999 2000 08-May-OO PINK AK SOUTHEAST AKI PORT ARMSTRONG PORT ARMSTRONG A33 TM 1999 2000 09-May-OO PINK AK SOUTHEAST DIPC GASTINEAU GASTINEAU TOTAL Pre-hatch 10# Mark Name STAGE WEIGHT LENGTH RELEASED RBr code Hatch Code Graphic PostHatch Graphic COMMENT A22 PTGraham99 FEED FRY 1:1.4,2.2 4,2,H 1111 II A23 AFK99 FEED FRY 0.5 41219084 1:1.4+2.3 4H3 1111 III Accessory Mark Faint A24 AFK99 FEED FRY 0.47 41348271 1:1.4 4H 1111 A25 AFK99 FEED FRY 0.39 53970337 1:1.4+2.4 4H4 1111 1111 Accessory Mark Faint A26 CCH99 FEED FRY 0.34 17127248 1:1.3,2.3+3.3 3,3H3 III III III A27 CCH99 FEED FRY 0.34 99769000 1:1.3,2.3 3,3H III III A28 CCH99 FEED FRY 0.34 15340069 1:1.3,2.3+3.4 3,3H4 III III 1111 A29 WHN99 FEED FRY 0.5 30989973 1:1.8+2.3 8H3 11111111 III A30 WHN99 FEED FRY 0.4 85079366 1 :1.8 8H 11111111 A31 SGH99 FEED FRY 0.5 195763690 1:1.6 6H 111111 A32 PTArm99Pink FEED FRY 0.63 45 21600000 1:1.3 3H III Not 100% Mark A33 DIPAC99Pink FEED FRY 0.9 1681918 1:1.4 4H 1111 5

Table 1 (continued). Summary of thermal mark codes applied to the 1999 brood year hatchery salmon in Alaska. SPECIES: CHUM, CHINOOK, COHO BROOD RELEASE DATE LAST STATEI 10# MARK TYPE YEAR YEAR RELEASED SPECIES PROVINCE REGION RELEASE AGENCY FACILITY STOCK A34 TM 1999 2000 26-May-OO CHUM AK SOUTHCENTRAL PWSA WALLY NOERENBERG WALLY NOERENBERG A35 TM 1999 2000 16-May-OO CHUM AK SOUTHCENTRAL PWSA WALLY NOERENBERG WALLY NOERENBERG A36 TM 1999 2000 19-May-OO CHUM AK SOUTHEAST DIPC GASTINEAU GASTINEAU A37 TM 1999 2000 19-May-OO CHUM AK SOUTHEAST DIPC GASTINEAU GASTINEAU A38 TM 1999 2000 1o-May-OO CHUM AK SOUTHEAST DIPC GASTINEAU GASTINEAU A39 TM 1999 2000 02-Jun-OO CHUM AK SOUTHEAST DIPC GASTINEAU GASTINEAU A40 TM 1999 2000 14-May-OO CHUM AK SOUTHEAST DIPC GASTINEAU GASTINEAU A41 TM 1999 2000 21-May-OO CHUM AK SOUTHEAST NSRA HIDDEN FALLS HIDDEN FAllS A42 TM 1999 2000 24-Apr-OO CHUM AK SOUTHEAST NSRA MEDVEJIE HIDDEN FAllS A43 AD+CWT+TM 1999 2001 CHINOOK AK SOUTHEAST DIPC GASTINEAU GASTINEAU A44 AD+CWT+TM 1999 2001 CHINOOK AK SOUTHEAST NSRA MEDVEJIE MEDVEJIE A45 AD+CWT+TM 1999 2001 CHINOOK AK SOUTHEAST NSRA HIDDEN FAllS HIDDEN FAllS A46 TM 1999 2001 COHO AK SOUTHCENTRAl CIM TRAIL LAKES BEARlK A47 TM 1999 2001 COHO AK SOUTHCENTRAl PWSA WAllY NOERENBERG A48 AD+CWT+TM 1999 2001 COHO AK SOUTHEAST AKI PORT ARMSTRONG A49 AD+CWT+TM 1999 2001 COHO AK SOUTHEAST DIPC GASTINEAU GASTINEAU TOTAL PreHatch 10# Mark Name STAGE WEIGHT LENGTH RELEASED RBr code Hatch Code Graphic PostHatch Gra hic COMMENT A34 WHN99CHUM FEED FRY 1.62 76306351 1:1.5 5H 11111 A35 PtChalmer99 FEED FRY 23995577 1:1.3 3H III A36 DIPAC99Chum FEED FRY 1.55 44496455 1:1.6 6H 111111 A37 DIPAC99Chum FEED FRY 1.7 27878900 1:1.6+2.3 6H3 111111 III A38 DIPAC99Chum FEED FRY 1.42 15100000 1:1.6+2.5 6H5 111111 11111 A39 DIPAC99Chum FEED FRY 4.04 8722507 1:1.6+2.6 6H6 111111 111111 LATE,LARGE FRY A40 DIPAC99Chum FEED FRY 1.61 9010000 1:1.6+2.4 6H4 111111 1111 A41 HiddenFalls99Chum FEED FRY 2 38689735 1:1.3,2.3 3,3H III III A42 Deeplnlet99 FEED FRY 1.68 13057000 1:1.4,2.3 4,3H 1111111 A43 DIPAC99Chin SMOlT 2:1.4 H4 1111 A44 Medvejie99Chin SMOlT 1:1.3,2.3 3,3H III III A45 HiddenFalls99Chin SMOlT 1:1.4,2.2 4,2H 1111 II A46 Traillake99Coho FEED FRY 1:1.3 3H III A47 WHN99Coho SMOlT 1:1.3 3H III A48 PlArm99Coho 1:1.3 3H III A49 Dipac99Coho SMOlT 1:1.4 4H 1111 6

Table 2. Summary of thermal mark codes applied to the 1999 brood year hatchery salmon in Washington State Sl!!cies Marking Location Release Location Release stage Number Released Hatch Code Pattern (*1000) Fall Chinook Lilliwaup Hatchery Duckabush River Fry 50 3,2H III II Fall Chinook Long Live the Kings Skokomish River Fry 50 2,1,2H 11111 Fall Chinook Long Live the Kings Hamma Hamma River Fry 50 1,4H I 1111 Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River Yearling 2500 2.2H1.2,1.1 1111 I II I I Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 2,2H2,2 1111 1111 Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 2,2H2.3,1 1111 II III I Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 2,2H2,6 1111 II 111111 Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 2,2H2.1.1.1 1111 II I I I Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 2,2H1.4,1.1 1111 I I III Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 2.2H1.4,1.1 1111 I 1111 I I Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 2.2H3,3 1111 III III Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 6H 111111 Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 2.3H II III Spring Chinook Kendall Creek Hatchery Nooksack River 3.1H III I Spring Chinook Dungeness Hatchery Dungeness River 842* 4H.4 I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook Dungeness Hatchery Dungeness River 12 ** I I I I I I I I I I I I Coho Hurd Creek Hatchery Snow Creek Fry 8 2,1,1H II I I Coho Hurd Creek Hatchery Andrews Creek Fry 8 1.1.2H I I II Coho Hurd Creek Hatchery Crocker Lake Fry 15 1,3H I III Summer Chum Dungeness Hatchery Salmon Creek Fry 32 3H I I I Summer Chum Dungeness Hatchery Chimacum Creek Fry 41.5 2,2H I I I I Summer Chum Lilliwaup Hatchery Hamma Hamma River Fry ~~ 1,3H1,3 I III I III Summer Chum Lilliwaup Hatchery Hamma Hamma River Fry 28 3,1H III I Summer Chum Lilliwaup Hatchery Lilliwaup River Fry 17 4H4 I I I I 1111 Summer Chum Big Beef Creek Hatchery Big Beef Creek Fry 40 2,2H4.1,1 II II 1111 I I Chum Grays River Hatchery Chinook River Fry 134 3.1H2.3 III I II III Chum Grays River Hatchery Grays River Fry 66 1.3H4.1 I III 1111 I Summer Chum Hurd Creek Hatchery Jimmycomelately Creek Fry 4.1 9** I I I I I I I I I Sockeye Landsburg Hatchery Cedar River Fry 675 4H3.1.2 1111 III I II Sockeye Landsburg Hatchery Cedar River Fry 739 4H1.1,4 1111 I 1\111 Sockeye Landsburg Hatchery Cedar River Fry 859 4H1.3.2 II I I II II Sockeye Landsburg Hatchery Cedar River Fry 949 4H1,2.2 1111 I II II aggregate total for au releases combined.* 'run on marks' - location of hatchinq variable 7

Table 3. Preliminary summary of thermal mark codes applied to the 1999 brood year hatchery salmon by Treaty Tribes in Washington State I Species Marking Location Release Location Number Released Hatch code Pattern (*1000) Summer Chinook Tulalip Hatchery Snohomish River 100 3H4 Fall Chinook Tulalip Hatchery Snohomish River 1900 2,3H4 I I I II III 1111 1111 Sockeye Makah Hatchery Lake OzeHe 22 1,3,1H I I I I I Sockeye Makah Hatchery OzeHe River 22 2,2,1H I I I I I Table 4. Preliminary summary of thermal mark codes applied to the 1999 brood year hatchery salmon by Oregon State. Species Marking Location Release Location Number Released Hatch code Pattem (*1000) Spring Chinook Marion Forks Hatchery Marion Forks 6,000* 3,4 ** I I I I I I I Spring Chinook Marion Forks Hatchery Marion Forks 8** IIIIIIII Spring Chinook Marion Forks Hatchery Clackamas River 1,7 ** I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook Marion Forks Hatchery Clackamas River 1,7 ** I IIIIIII Spring Chinook McKenzie Hatchery McKenzie River 7,1** I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook WillameHe Hatchery S. Santiam River 8** I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook WillameHe Hatchery S. Santiam River 6** I I I I I I Spring Chinook Willamette Hatchery S. Santiam River 1,3,3n,2** I I I I III I I Spring Chinook Willamette Hatchery S. Santiam River 1,7 ** I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook WiliameHe Hatchery Willamette River 1,7- I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook McKenzie Hatchery McKenzie River 1,2n,1,8 ** I II I I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook McKenzie Hatchery McKenzie River 2n,2,8 ** II I I I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook McKenzie Hatchery McKenzie River 4,7,1* I I I I I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook McKenzie Hatchery McKenzie River 4,4,3* I I I I I I I I I I I I Spring Chinook McKenzie Hatchery McKenzie River 4,4,2,1 ** I I I I I I I I I I I *aggregate total for all releases combined ** 'run on marks' location of hatching is variable 8