ACOUSTIC VELOCITY FOR NATURAL GAS

Similar documents
Acoustic Troubleshooting of Coal Bed Methane Wells

Acoustic Liquid Level Testing of Gas Wells

Well Testing Plan. New York Marginal Well Study. Introduction. I. Tests to be Conducted. II. Testing Procedures

Downhole Gas Separation Performance

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Acoustic Liquid-Level Determination of Liquid Loading in Gas Wells

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Acoustic Techniques to Monitor and Troubleshoot Gas-lift Wells

Downhole Diverter Gas Separator

TROUBLESHOOT ROD PUMPED WELLS USING TUBING FLUID LEVEL SHOTS

Packer-Type Gas Separator with Seating Nipple

FLOWING GRADIENTS IN LIQUID LOADED GAS WELLS

Pump Fillage Problem Overview. Jim McCoy. 9 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop. Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 17-20, 2013

Dynamic IPR and Gas Flow Rate Determined for Conventional Plunger Lift Well

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS

Intrinsically Safe Acoustic Instrument Used in Troubleshooting Gas Lift Wells

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Early Kick Detection Through Liquid Level Monitoring in the Wellbore J.J. Schubert, SPE, Texas A&M University, and J.C. Wright, SPE, Conoco, Inc

Jim McCoy. Tubing Anchor Effect on Pump Fillage. Lynn Rowlan Tony Podio Ken Skinner. Gas Well Deliquification Workshop.

Down-Hole Gas Separator Performance Simulation

Downhole Gas Separators

Troubleshooting Gas-lift Wells Using Dual Shot Acoustic Technique

Beam Pumping to Dewater Horizontal Gas Wells

COPYRIGHT. Production Logging Flowmeter Survey Solution Guide

Presents the following instructional slide show:

Using Gas Lift to Unload Horizontal Gas Wells

Pressure Test Tubing for Leak

GAS CONDENSATE RESERVOIRS. Dr. Helmy Sayyouh Petroleum Engineering Cairo University

Rig Math. Page 1.

Chapter 13 Gases, Vapors, Liquids, and Solids

International Journal of Petroleum and Geoscience Engineering Volume 03, Issue 01, Pages 56-60, 2015

A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO ADDRESSING ANNULAR PRESSURE ISSUES AND STRAY GAS MIGRATION IN THE UNCONVENTIONAL SHALE PLAYS

Sucker Rod Lift Downhole Gas Separators Proposed Industry Testing

PETROLEUM ENGINEERING 310 SECOND EXAM. October 23, 2002

Anomaly Marker Method for Gas-Lift Wells

International Journal of Petroleum and Geoscience Engineering Volume 03, Issue 02, Pages , 2015

Experiment (13): Flow channel

5.0 Neutral Buoyancy Test

Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Technology in a Mature Industry. September 2017 John C. Patterson Consultant Retired from ConocoPhillips (2015)

Gas Lift Workshop Doha Qatar 4-88 February Gas Lift Optimisation of Long Horizontal Wells. by Juan Carlos Mantecon

Name. Student I.D.. Section:. Use g = 10 m/s 2

NEW PROGRAM! OIL AND GAS TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

Gas viscosity ( ) Carr-Kobayashi-Burrows Correlation Method Lee-Gonzalez-Eakin Method. Carr-Kobayashi-Burrows Correlation Method

A New and Simplified Method for Determination of Conductor Surface Casing Setting Depths in Shallow Marine Sediments (SMS)

16. Studio ScaleChem Calculations

GEOTHERMAL WELL COMPLETION TESTS

Petr 311 Wellbore pressures and Kick Control

Contact Information. Progressive Optimization Service. We Provide: Street Bay #2. Grande Prairie, AB T8V - 4Z2

Understanding pressure and pressure

Device Description. Operating Information. CP Q (eq. 1) GT. Technical Bulletin TB-0607-CFP Hawkeye Industries Critical Flow Prover

Natural Gas Properties Analysis of Bangladesh: A Case Study of Titas Gas Field

COMBINATION AIR RELEASE DEGASSING (CARD) VALVES INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL

LOW PRESSURE EFFUSION OF GASES adapted by Luke Hanley and Mike Trenary

Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach?

Gas-Well De-Watering Method Field Study

WellTracer. East Texas Gas Producers Association. Carthage, Texas September 21 st, 2010

Chapter 13 Fluids. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Name: Date: Math in Basketball: Take the Challenge Student Handout

Practice Exam IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

Design Tapered Electric Submersible Pumps For Gassy Wells Desheng Zhou, SPE, Rajesh Sachdeva, SPE, IHS INC.

Have you seen a truck weighing bridge? Do you know how it works?

MIA Training Example (Beattie No. 99)

SPE Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers

Presented By Dr. Youness El Fadili. February 21 th 2017

Air Eliminators and Combination Air Eliminators Strainers

BACK PRESSURE / SUSTAINING

MIA Training Example (Catalano 2H)

Optimization of Separator Train in Oil Industry

Lab 3 Introduction to Quantitative Analysis: Pumps and Measurements of Flow

Physics 2048 Test 1 Fall 2000 Dr. Jeff Saul Name:

LOW PRESSURE EFFUSION OF GASES revised by Igor Bolotin 03/05/12

WILD WELL CONTROL WARNING SIGNS OF KICKS

Gas Gathering System Modeling The Pipeline Pressure Loss Match

Appalachian Basin Gas Well. Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio June 7-8, Development. Robert McKee, P.E. Design Engineer Multi Products Company

Coiled Tubing string Fatigue Management in High Pressure Milling Operation- Case Study

BACK PRESSURE / SUSTAINING

PETROLEUM ENGINEERING 310 FIRST EXAM. September 22, 2000

TOPIC: KNOWLEDGE: K1.01 [2.5/2.7] An atmospheric pressure of 15.0 psia is equivalent to... A psig. B psig. C psig.

PHYSICS. Mr Rishi Gopie HYDROSTATICS

OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM

Experiment. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VOLUME AND TEMPERATURE, i.e.,charles Law. By Dale A. Hammond, PhD, Brigham Young University Hawaii

Compositional Grading Theory and Practice

GAS MIXTURES. Department of Mechanical Engineering

Engineering Information. Flow Data. Flow Data. Importance of Valve Sizing. Estimating Cv or Orifice Size:

Oceans - Laboratory 12

I I IS9 0.6 to 1.0 at given initial temperatures and

Hydraulic Optimization Worksheet for MS Excel All Versions subsequent to 5.0

Background information. normal force on a surface area of the surface

Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Automation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall Rates

An approach to account ESP head degradation in gassy well for ESP frequency optimization

Module 03 Accident modeling, risk assessment and management Lecture 04 Explosions

OVERVIEW. Flow Coefficient C v. Operating Conditions. Specific Gravity

Step-Rate Formation Integrity Test Method for Geothermal Wells

CVEN 311 Fluid Dynamics Fall Semester 2011 Dr. Kelly Brumbelow, Texas A&M University. Final Exam

Pressure Measurement

PRESSURE REGULATOR PRESSURE REDUCING. APPLICATION: Regulation of inlet pressure to gas compressors. Control of supply or distribution system pressure

3 1 PRESSURE. This is illustrated in Fig. 3 3.

Gas Physics Pressure and Flow Topics Covered:

Casing and Cementing Requirements

Transcription:

ACOUSTIC VELOCITY FOR NATURAL GAS Introduction Acoustic velocity data for natural gas is useful for determining liquid levels in oil or gas wells and locating obstructions in gas lines. Application of Data Generally the distance to the liquid level in an oil well is determined by generating a pressure wave in the casing annulus gas at the surface. The wave travels through the casing annulus gas to the liquid level which reflects the wave back to the surface. Generally, the depth is obtained by reference to obstructions in the annular space - the most common being collars, and/or liners, and/or perforations. Sometimes however, the distance to the liquid level is determined by generating a pressure wave at the surface and measuring the time required for the wave to travel to the liquid level and back to the surface. With a knowledge of the acoustic velocity of the gas, the distance which the wave travelled (surface to liquid level to surface) is simply the time of travel multiplied by the acoustic velocity. The distance to the liquid level would be one half of the above or D = T V 2 where D = Distance to liquid level, ft. T = Time between initial wave generation and reflected wave, sec. V = Acoustic velocity, ft./sec. The divisor of 2 is necssary because the distance to the liquid level is one-half of the total distance traveled by the pressure wave. The acoustic velocity should be determined from the charts using the pressure and temperature at a depth of 1/2 of the distance to the liquid. The pressure at that depth can be estimated from data in reference No. 1. The temperature at that depth is often available or can be estimated from data given by P. L. Moses, reference No. 3. Data presented herein is also beneficial for predicting acoustic velocity behavior. On some acoustic liquid level charts, the collars and/or liners are not recorded on the lower portion of the chart, and hence information on the behavior of acoustic velocity at the higher pressure and temperature is desirable. Application of the data to acoustic well sounding is interesting. For example, assume a well with the liquid level at 10,000 feet, a surface temperature of 74 o F, a temperature of 194 o F at 10,000 feet, a gas gravity of 0.8 and a surface pressure of 100 PSIA. The acoustic velocity at the surface is 1145 ft./sec. The pressure increases with depth and the pressure at the liquid level is 132 PSIA. The acoustic velocity at 74 o F decreases to 1140 ft./ sec. with the increase of pressure. Assuming a constant pressure of 100 PSIA and a change of temperature to 194 o F results in an acoustic velocity of 1272 ft./sec. The acoustic velocity at liquid level conditions of 132 PSIA and 194 o F is 1268 ft./ sec. Thus the acoustic velocity is approximately 10.7% greater at the bottom of the well than at the surface.

Discussion of Graph Data The acoustic velocity is given as functions of pressure and temperature for gas gravities of 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 at pressures from 0 to 3000 PSIA and normal operating temperatures of approximately 32 o F (0 o C) to 400 o F (205 o C). Contrary to popular belief, the acoustic velocity decreases with an increase of pressure below pressures of approximately 1000 PSIA. Graphs covering a wider range of temperature and pressures are available from the author. Note that the graphs indicate the normal rise in temperature with depth increases the acoustic velocity to a greater extent than the build up of pressure with depth decreases the acoustic velocity at pressures below approximately 1000 PSIA. At pressures above approximately 1000 PSIA, acoustic velocity increases with pressure. Limitations of Application of Graphs to Acoustic Liquid Level Determination In acoustic liquid level determination utilizing the time - acoustic velocity principle, special precautions must be applied. The time - acoustic velocity principle is best applied to wells or gas columns which have a uniform gas composition. Wells venting gas at the surface to atmosphere or to the flow line contain gas in the entire annular space of relatively uniform composition and an accurate acoustic velocity can be determined. If the well does not vent gas or the gas column has been shut in at the surface for a long time, a considerable difference in the composition of gas throughout the casing annulus can occur, and considerable difference in the acoustic velocity will occur. Acoustic velocity differences of 35% have been noted in individual wells. Also, if air has been permitted to enter the surface openings, a considerable difference in acoustic velocities will occur. Source of Data This data has been obtained from a paper given by L. K. Thomas 2. The original work required a knowledge of the gas gravity, temperature and pressure. From this, the pseudocritical pressure, pseudocritical temperature, pseudo reduced pressure, and pseudo reduced temperature were calculated or determined. Then by use of graphs given in the paper the acoustic velocity could be determined. The graphs presented herein show the acoustic velocity as a function of pressure and temperature. The presented graphs should have an average error approaching 0.71 percent claimed in the original work. Acoustic Velocity of Dry Air The acoustic velocity of dry air at 32 o F (0 o C) and standard pressure is 1087 ft./sec. (331.45 meters/sec.) and changes directly with temperature at the approximate rate of 1.075 ft./sec./'f (or 0.59 meters / sec. / o C. References: 1. McCoy, James N., Analyzing Well Performance VI, Southwestern Petroleum Short Course Association, 1973, Lubbock, Texas. Available from Echometer Company, 5001 Ditto Lane, Wichita Falls, Texas 76302. 2. Thomas, Hankinson, & Phillips, Determination of Acoustic Velocities for Natural Gas, SPE #2579 of AIME 3. P. L. Moses, Geothermal Gradients, Drilling & Production Practice, (1961) available from Core Lob., Inc., Dallas, Texas