Natural Resource Enterprises: Enhancing Conservation and Income on Private Lands in Mississippi

Similar documents
Fee-Hunting and Wildlife Management Activities by Nonindustrial, Private Landowners in the Mississippi Delta

Results from the 2012 Quail Action Plan Landowner Survey

COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROJECT

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Hunting, Shooting, and Fishing Recruitment and Retention Programs

The Value of Springs to The Petersen Ranch

Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

The North American Waterfowl Management Plan: Incorporating the New Goal

Note: You do not need to be a Wisconsin landowner; we ll consider any woodland owner in the Midwest region.

Hunting Lease Enterprises for Private Landowners

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

WILDLIFE WATCHING U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 2006 NATIONAL SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS*

Dog-deer hunting is unlike other types of hunting that use dogs.

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S

Profiles IN CONSERVATION. Keeping in Harmony with Family Legacy Delaware landowner develops diversion crops for deer

An Empirical Analysis of Hunting Lease Pricing and Value of G

ONE (1) EQUITY SHARE $850,000. "One of the Finest Equity Share Clubs on the Mississippi River"

Introduction. Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries Graduate Seminar Demand for Wildlife Hunting in the Southeastern United States

2016 Volunteer Program Annual Report

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

/ LAKE LOT AVAILABLE!!

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

The NBCI Habitat Inventory is an index of the potential for bobwhite to occur on the landscape, now or

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

Participation and Expenditure Patterns of African-American, Hispanic, and Female Hunters and Anglers

ECONOMIC IMP ACT REPORT 2018

ARkAnsAs tennessee Primary Partner: Primary Partner: Habitat Work: Habitat Work:

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Franklin County Ranch Hunting, Fishing, Recreation, Cattle Hardwoods, Lakes, Ponds, Waterfowl Habitat, Pastures

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Lease Hunting Opportunities for Oklahoma Landowners

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

offered for sale RIVER BEND RESERVE A Recreational Investment Opportunity offered by

TRCP National Sportsmen s Survey Online/phone survey of 1,000 hunters and anglers throughout the United States

The University of Georgia

CLIFFORD PATTON HUTT

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington

Conservation Access Projects Habitat Enforcement

Trapping Matters PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOPS

WILD HOGS IN MISSISSIPPI

Basic Information Everyone Should Know

ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES HUNTING. in America AN ECONOMIC ENGINE AND CONSERVATION POWERHOUSE

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

Reasons Include the Recession, the Locavore Movement, and More Women Hunting

Dear Chairman Bishop, Chairman Hoeven, Ranking Member Fortenberry, and Ranking Member Merkley:

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Agency Overview. Appropriations Subcommittee on Natural and Economic Resources February 22, 2011

Guided hunt in maryland

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

Attracting what you want. Controlling what you don t.

ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION STRATEGIC SQUIRREL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Appendix A (Survey Results) Scroll Down

Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Team OCEAN at Rookery Bay

Public Land Management: Issues & Implications

State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands

Trapping Matters PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOPS

Attracting what you want. Controlling what you don t.

Annual Meeting and Director Elections

State Regulation of Sunday Hunting Washington New Hampshire Montana North Dakota Minnesota Vermont Maine Oregon Massachusetts Idaho South Dakota Wisco

GUIDELINES ON ACCESS AND CONSERVATION ON CRAGS AND CLIFFS

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Crisis for America s Wetlands

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

ADOPT-A-STREAM WATERSHED APPROACH COMMUNITY-BASED STEWARDSHIP. Nova Scotia Salmon Association March 2005

Endangered Species on Private Lands Lauren K. Ward, J.D. & Doctoral Candidate Gary T. Green, Professor & Assistant Dean

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

Marketing the Hunting Experience

Lone Cypress Farms KFS 1103

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

EXHIBITOR PROSPECTUS

2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

Furbearer Management Newsletter

Outstanding Timber and Hunting Tract 330 +/- Acres in Franklin County, MS Seale Road, Roxie, MS

Rural Ontario s Hidden Sector: The Economic Importance of the Horse Industry Final Report

Acquisition & Protection

Key Findings from a Statewide Survey of Wyoming Voters October 2018 Lori Weigel

Hunting for Sustainability Conservation and local, free-range protein. Keith Warnke WDNR

Nueces County Guided Fishing Market Research

DEER MANAGEMENT. The Role of Genetics and Nutrition in

YOUNG FARM & SPORTING CLUB A Premium Recreational Investment Property & Hunting Paradise

Chapter 1 Program Overview

Ag-Environmental Awards

Deer Management Unit 255

RED RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE


Summary report on all harvested species on Patuxent Research Refuge from September 1 - January 31, 2017 Deer Harvest

[FWS R4 R 2015 N236]; [FXRS S3 167 FF04R02000] Theodore Roosevelt and Holt Collier National Wildlife Refuges, Mississippi Final

2016 ANNUAL REPORT A CONSTITUTIONAL AGENCY FUNDED BY SPORTSMEN AND WOMEN THROUGH THEIR PURCHASE OF HUNTING AND FISHING LICENSES.

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon

Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Grants FW 71 R 1 F14AF NJ Wildlife Management Area User Survey Final Report

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

AMERICAN SPORTFISHING ASSOCIATION SPORTFISHING. in America AN ECONOMIC ENGINE AND CONSERVATION POWERHOUSE

Western Great Lakes Region FAN UPDATE

Transcription:

Natural Resource Enterprises: Enhancing Conservation and Income on Private Lands in Mississippi Connecting Entrepreneurial Communities Wednesday 8, 2014

Recreational Access Recreation on Private Lands Hunting Fishing Wildlife watching Horse trail riding Agritainment Bed & breakfast

Outdoor Recreation in USA Participants - 90 million Expenditures $145 billion (US) spent Hunting - $34 billion Fishing - $42 billion Wildlife watching - $55 billion

Outdoor Recreation in Michigan Hunting 753,000 hunters $916 million spent Fishing 1.4 million anglers $1.7 billion spent Wildlife Watching 3.2 million participants $1.6 billion

Outdoor Recreation in AR-LA-MS Fishing 1.9 million anglers $1.7 billion spent Hunting 1.0 million hunters $1.8 billion spent Wildlife Watching 2.2 million participants $1.1 billion

Outdoor Recreation in Mississippi Total economic impact $2.92 billion 71,435 jobs created

NRE Program at MSU Information delivery Well-informed clientele Income diversification

NRE Program Partner network Outreach programming Landowner workshops Demonstrations Websites Marketing

National and LMAV Focus Partnering states Indiana 8 workshops conducted South Carolina 3 workshops Minnesota 2 workshops conducted Conducted workshops Program Interest 9

Programming Partnering states Arkansas 9 workshops conducted Alabama 6 workshops conducted Tennessee 1 workshop conducted 10

Programming Partnering states Louisiana 8 workshops conducted 2 coastal venues Braithwaite; Lake Charles Oregon Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm Yamsi Ranch Michigan Gaylord Mississippi 11

Landowner Workshop Series Hosted on landowner property Involve community leaders Presentations from professionals and landowners How to information

Advanced Curriculum Workshops Business planning and legal considerations Group activity Design a prospective enterprise Present business plan to audience Wildlife conservation 14

Landowner Workshops Conducted over 75 events Over 4,000 participants Landownership in 16 states Events in 10 states & Sweden

Workshop Survey Results Rating 3.8 on 4 point scale Participants (99%) met management goals Participants (75%) will change land use practices

Workshop Survey Results Average individual ownership = 850 acres Forested 43% Agriculture 22% Fallow 26% Wetlands 9%

Workshop Survey Results Expected annual earnings $28,415 per landowner $17 per acre revenues $12 million aggregate cash flow Improved 2 million acres in conservation

NRE Landowner Survey Study Questionnaire Sections Landownership Cost-share programs Revenues collected NRE s initiated Informational needs Demographics

NRE Landowner Survey Study Landowner responses pooled Response rate 45% n=514 Information searching Website Wildlife management Business resources Upcoming events

NRE Landowner Survey Study Video training (72% interested) Binder was favored (65%) Wildlife mgt. (82%) Timber mgt. (80%) Legal issues (76%) Wildlife foods (74%) Agritourism (63%) Fee hunting (62%) Business planning (62%)

Landownership Trends Event attendees (landowners - 91%) Land use Agriculture (78%) Forestry (63%) Personal recreation (61%) Fee access (22%) Vegetable production (18%)

Landownership Trends 543 acres on average 16 states; n=290 Forest 366 acres N=437 Agriculture 195 acres n=352 Other 101 acres n=281

Conservation Practices Conservation implemented (n=118) on 14,464 acres (122 acres/farm) Mowing 56% Wildlife plantings 50% Herbicide 43% Disking 34% Prescribed fire 30% Timber mgt. 29%

Conservation Practices Information requested (n=294) Wildlife plantings (47%) Herbicide (39%) Pond management (36%) Forest thinning (32%) Prescribed burning (29%) 51% requested help

Cost-share Assistance 48% participated; $5,000 payment CRP n=97 203 acres on average WRP n=29 140 acres on average WHIP n=52 46 acres on average EQIP n=49 CSP n=30 37 acres on average 107 acres average

Revenues Collected 164 landowners initiated NRE s Fee hunting (n=40) Hunting leases (n=46) Tourism/agritainment (n=30) Featured species Deer (n=101) Turkey (n=62) Squirrel (n=27) Waterfowl (n=24) Mourning dove (n=21) Rabbit (n=21)

Revenues Collected NRE revenues Averaged $13,387 per landowner $2.2 million from sample $9 million cash flow in total On 701 acres per farm On 115,043 total acres Farm revenues - $21/acre 69% reported that revenues met expectations

Revenues Collected Motivations Income potential (96%) Land management and conservation (82%) Recreational potential (81%) Improve wildlife and fish on property (81%) Hobby and enjoyment (80%)

Business Planning Most did not have business plan or marketing plan > 90% Primary clientele Adult hunters Families Out-of-town guests Word of mouth Average customer base 171 annually

Informational Needs Increasing wildlife on land (#1) Concerned about liability (#2) Insurance Screen clients Topics wildlife and fish, legal issues, forestry, conservation practices, fee hunting and fishing Interested in advanced NRE training (80%) Workshops preferred

Demographics 63% male; 36% women 56-75 years old (56%) 91% Caucasian Wide income range 67% college graduate 52% lived on land; 48% did not 88 miles on average away

Future Directions Land management and advanced workshops Video & online modules High demand Continue to survey participants Monitor impacts

Value-added Benefits to landowners & communities Enhance income and economic development Conservation Enhance wildlife Control access Promote land stewardship and retention

W. Daryl Jones, Ph.D. Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Aquaculture Mississippi State University 662/325-5769 djones@cfr.msstate.edu www.naturalresources.msstate.edu