BASE STATION ANTENNAS RELIABLE WIND LOAD CALCULATION

Similar documents
THE INFLUENCE OF THE NOSE SHAPE OF HIGH SPEED TRAINS ON THE AERODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS

Critical Gust Pressures on Tall Building Frames-Review of Codal Provisions

SUBPART C - STRUCTURE

Fig 2.17: Topographic model: snow-free area (Snow boundary = red) Contour interval of 1 m.

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

J. Szantyr Lecture No. 21 Aerodynamics of the lifting foils Lifting foils are important parts of many products of contemporary technology.

Power efficiency and aerodynamic forces measurements on the Dettwiler-wind turbine

JAR-23 Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes \ Issued 11 March 1994 \ Section 1- Requirements \ Subpart C - Structure \ General

Implementing Provisions for Art. 411 of the ICR Ski Jumping

Determination of the wind pressure distribution on the facade of the triangularly shaped high-rise building structure

ESTIMATION OF THE DESIGN WIND SPEED BASED ON

An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul

Surrounding buildings and wind pressure distribution on a high rise building

Quantification of the Effects of Turbulence in Wind on the Flutter Stability of Suspension Bridges

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Possibility of Forming the Wake Flow of Large Ships by Using the Vortex Generators

AIRFLOW GENERATION IN A TUNNEL USING A SACCARDO VENTILATION SYSTEM AGAINST THE BUOYANCY EFFECT PRODUCED BY A FIRE

ANALYSIS OF AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A SUPERCRITICAL AIRFOIL FOR LOW SPEED AIRCRAFT

Analysis of pressure losses in the diffuser of a control valve

Parasite Drag. by David F. Rogers Copyright c 2005 David F. Rogers. All rights reserved.

THE IMPACT OF PRESSURE AND SUCTION WAVES ON INSTALLED COMPONENTS, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO ENCLOSURES IN RAILWAY TUNNELS

Ermenek Dam and HEPP: Spillway Test & 3D Numeric-Hydraulic Analysis of Jet Collision

Control Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cut-out wind speeds

UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARY. Hong Kong Collection

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Optimization of a Wing-Sail shape for a small boat

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WIND PRESSURES ON IRREGULAR- PLAN SHAPE BUILDINGS

Measurement and simulation of the flow field around a triangular lattice meteorological mast

Lab 4: Pressure Gradients over a Wing

Wind tunnel tests of a non-typical stadium roof

Influence of the Number of Blades on the Mechanical Power Curve of Wind Turbines

Results and Discussion for Steady Measurements

ClassNK Technical Information No. TEC Required minimum propulsion power In principle, the installed propulsion power (total main engine output

Aalborg Universitet. Published in: Proceedings of Offshore Wind 2007 Conference & Exhibition. Publication date: 2007

ZIN Technologies PHi Engineering Support. PHi-RPT CFD Analysis of Large Bubble Mixing. June 26, 2006

STUDIES ON THE OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE OF TAPERED VORTEX FLAPS

Safety Manual VEGAVIB series 60

ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher

Pedestrian traffic flow operations on a platform: observations and comparison with simulation tool SimPed

Journal of Applied Fluid Transients, Vol 1-1, April 2014 (3-1)

OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Study by numerical simulations on the breathing effect in a semi-underground highway with beams and a roof above it

Evaluation of aerodynamic criteria in the design of a small wind turbine with the lifting line model

CALMO

Wave phenomena in a ripple tank

Improved Aerodynamic Characteristics of Aerofoil Shaped Fuselage than that of the Conventional Cylindrical Shaped Fuselage

Safety Manual. Process pressure transmitter IPT-1* 4 20 ma/hart. Process pressure transmitter IPT-1*

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

INTERIM GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING MINIMUM PROPULSION POWER TO MAINTAIN THE MANOEUVRABILITY OF SHIPS IN ADVERSE CONDITIONS

Density of Individual Airborne Wind Energy Systems in AWES Farms

2/2- and 3/2-way Rocker Solenoid Valve - bistable (impulse) version

SAFE DESIGN OF RURAL ROADS BY NORMALIZED ROAD CHARACTERISTICS

Free Surface Flow Simulation with ACUSIM in the Water Industry

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HAWT BLADES

deltaflowc deltaflowc Venturi or Probe

DAMAGE STABILITY TESTS OF MODELS REPRESENTING RO-RC) FERRIES PERFORMED AT DMI

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOW BEHAVIOUR IN A MODERN TRAFFIC TUNNEL IN CASE OF FIRE INCIDENT

Safety Manual VEGAVIB series 60

AIR-X COMPACT AIR-X ON-LINE LUBRICANT AERATION MEASUREMENT. Technical Brochure ON RUNNING ENGINES

Exercise 3. Power Versus Wind Speed EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE. Air density DISCUSSION

New Technologies applied to the design and optimization of tunnel ventilation systems

Computational Analysis of Cavity Effect over Aircraft Wing

Basis of Structural Design

Fatigue Resistant Sockets for Dynamic Loads PFEIFER Cable Structures. Cable structures technology Info Nr PFEIFER SEIL- UND HEBETECHNIK GMBH

Available online at Procedia Engineering 200 (2010) (2009)

Effects of seam and surface texture on tennis balls aerodynamics

Research on Small Wind Power System Based on H-type Vertical Wind Turbine Rong-Qiang GUAN a, Jing YU b

External Tank- Drag Reduction Methods and Flow Analysis

Investigation on 3-D Wing of commercial Aeroplane with Aerofoil NACA 2415 Using CFD Fluent

Pressure Reducing Valve DMV 750 set range: bar

Solving Quadratic Equations (FAL)

» Wind Propulsion for Cargo Ships «Performance Parameters and Operational Aspects

Windcube FCR measurements

HiPerMax LuK tooth chain for transmissions Reliable Power Flow in the Drive Train

PVP Copyright 2009 by ASME

Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters

ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS S O L O N STANDARD MODULES

An Analysis of Lift and Drag Forces of NACA Airfoils Using Python

MEDAP-MOBILE GAS SUPPLY

Windmills using aerodynamic drag as propelling force; a hopeless concept. ing. A. Kragten. April 2009 KD 416

Aerodynamic Performance of Trains with Different Longitudinal Section Lines under Crosswind

CFD AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AERODYNAMIC DEGRADATION OF ICED AIRFOILS

CFD Analysis ofwind Turbine Airfoil at Various Angles of Attack

Experiment Instructions. Circulating Pumps Training Panel

THEORY OF WINGS AND WIND TUNNEL TESTING OF A NACA 2415 AIRFOIL. By Mehrdad Ghods

2013 Wall of Wind (WoW) Contest Informational Workshop

Comparison of Wind Turbines Regarding their Energy Generation.

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 147 (2016 ) 74 80

Formula SAE Aerodynamic Package Design

Pneumatic Gripping Modules. Pneumatic 2-Finger Radial Grippers

Aerodynamic Analyses of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine By Different Blade Airfoil Using Computer Program

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NACA 0012 AIRFOIL SECTION AT DIFFERENT ANGLES OF ATTACK

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

Introduction with New Methods for Train Operation Control in Strong Winds at East Japan Railway Company

2 Available: 1390/08/02 Date of returning: 1390/08/17 1. A suction cup is used to support a plate of weight as shown in below Figure. For the conditio

AE Dept., KFUPM. Dr. Abdullah M. Al-Garni. Fuel Economy. Emissions Maximum Speed Acceleration Directional Stability Stability.

CRYSTALLIZATION FOULING IN PACKED COLUMNS

3D-simulation of the turbulent wake behind a wind turbine

Pneumatic Grippers Swivel Modules

PREDICTING THE ABILITY OF SURVIVAL AFTER DAMAGE IN TANKERS. José Poblet Martínez - SENER, (Spain) José Javier Díaz Yraola - SENER, (Spain)

Transcription:

White Paper BASE STATION ANTENNAS RELIABLE WIND LOAD CALCULATION CONTENTS Abstract The importance of the wind load Methods of determining the wind load Determining the wind load The principle of the wind load determination The antenna in the wind tunnel The wind load at the antenna sites FAQ Appendix Sources ABSTRACT One of the most important mechanical characteristics stated in the data sheets of base station antennas is the wind load. This white paper describes how this parameter is determined and its values are obtained. The technically oriented user can find a detailed overview of the various calculation steps according to standards at the end of this document. This report will also go into detail concerning the reasons why Kathrein emphasises the frontal and maximum wind loads. It clearly defines wind load characteristics and explains the background to the calculations and tests conducted by Kathrein. White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 1 of 16

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WIND LOAD The market for base station antennas is developing very dynamically. To ensure that the demand for growing data transmission capacities is well met, antennas are developed to be more efficient and complex. This has an impact on the outside dimensions of antennas, even though these are designed with an increasing integration density. With this development, the strength of the existing antenna masts may no longer be ensured, especially when antennas in the field are replaced or additional ones are mounted. Antenna site operators implementing modernisations are, therefore, facing additional costs. Furthermore, high wind loads at high wind speeds, for example during storms or hurricanes, are a particular challenge. The MNOs (mobile network operators) or their contractors are always legally responsible for designing and dimensioning antenna sites. Depending on the region and the location of the antenna site, these influences have to be taken into account when considering the site safety from a structural analysis point of view. 1996 2006 2012 2016... year Figure 1: Antenna sizes over the years This white paper on wind loading gives a detailed explanation of these facts and circumstances. It provides a clear understanding of the values stated in data sheets and reveals their limits of use. METHODS OF DETERMINING THE WIND LOAD There are three recognised methods for determining the wind load of base station antennas: 1. Numerical simulation of the wind flow 2. Wind tunnel testing 3. Calculation according to standards From the time when the first base station antennas were developed in the 1980s until today s solutions, Kathrein has conducted studies to ascertain the best suitable method for determining the wind load. This has resulted in Kathrein using a combination of all the three methods. White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 2 of 16

1. Numerical simulation of the wind flow The numerical simulation is used for the qualitative development of flow-optimised profiles. At Kathrein, this method is not used as the only basis for determining the wind load values stated in data sheets. 2. Wind tunnel testing The values obtained in wind tunnel tests are dependent on the characteristics of the wind tunnel and the test set-up. In order to obtain comparable results, the antennas are tested with the same test set-up in the same wind tunnel. Kathrein uses the wind tunnel to ascertain flow characteristics, to validate mathematical methods and to quantitatively determine the wind load of specific profiles in a 360 scan. 3. Calculation according to standards Kathrein calculates the wind load of antennas according to recognised and internationally valid standards. This ensures that the method used is clearly defined and universally comprehensible. The calculation according to standards is an accepted and reliable method. However, subsequent tests in the wind tunnel have shown that the calculated results are conservative rather than precise. This explains why a combination of computation according to standards and wind tunnel testing is used for the data sheets. The complete procedure is described in detail in Section Determining the wind load, p. 3. Figure 2: Numerical simulation of an antenna profile Figure 3: Test set-up in the wind tunnel Kathrein uses the standard in combination with the results from the wind tunnel tests. This standard approximates the general forms of antennas. DETERMINING THE WIND LOAD With regard to the wind load determination, it is necessary to point out that the established values are only applicable to a standard case, i.e. an antenna with its original brackets and accessories which is mounted directly on one continuous mast. This is considered the standard case of how antennas are mounted. All other objects that may be within the antenna s sphere White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 3 of 16

of flow influence are not considered. These may include additional antennas, filters, cables, supplementary mounting equipment and many other items which would increase the number of possible combinations enormously. For this reason, only one antenna per mast is examined. The principle of the wind load determination Due to the radiation-optimised shape of Kathrein s base station antennas, the wind load is calculated in compliance with the standard on the basis of a body with a rectangular cross section with rounded-off corners. All the variables which appear in the calculation are defined in detail below. Figure 4: Standard configuration F w = c f A ref q p F w c f A ref q p N - m 2 N/m 2 Formula 1 The wind load F w of base station antennas in the form of a rectangular body with rounded-off corners is the product of the force coefficient c f, the projected area A ref and the dynamic pressure q p. The force coefficient c f represents the aerodynamic properties of objects: the more favourable the shape for the airflow, the smaller this value. The force coefficient can be determined by means of wind tunnel tests, taken from published literature or calculated using the standards. The projected area A ref is the product of the length and the depth or width of the antenna, depending on the airflow direction. The dynamic pressure q p is the square function of the wind velocity: if the wind velocity doubles, the dynamic pressure quadruplicates. q p = ½ ρ v² q p ρ v N/m 2 kg/m 3 m/s Formula 2 The air density ρ depends on the temperature and the air pressure (at height above sea level). The standard recommends a value of 1.25 kg/m³. The detailed deduction of the individual values can be found in the appendix on pages 13ff. White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 4 of 16

It is customary to calculate the wind load according to Formula 1 by multiplying the area by the force coefficient A c and using a site-specific dynamic pressure. The value A c of Kathrein s antennas can be calculated using the wind load at 150 km/h given in the data sheet as follows: A c = F 150 km/h / 1085 N/m ² F 150km/h A c N m 2 Formula 3 The calculation according to the standard gives results for a specific wind direction, e.g. frontal or lateral airflow. For flow angles between these calculated points, the wind load is interpolated and has, therefore, only limited significance. Moreover, the calculated results are far higher than the values obtained from the wind tunnel tests. Due to these facts, Kathrein uses a combination of measured results and standard calculations for the data sheet values. As a further consequence, the wind loads are now uniquely indicated as the frontal and the maximum wind load. This results in a realistic representation of the standard case antennas. The force coefficient determined in the wind tunnel is used as a basis for the wind load calculation of an antenna with a specified length. In combination with the reduction factor Ψ λ for the peripheral flow taken from the standard, the wind loads for other antenna lengths are determined analogously, as shown in the appendix. The calculation of the wind load by means of the wind tunnel test results gives detailed information for each wind direction, including those which would only be available as calculated interpolation values otherwise. The results from the wind tunnel tests show that the frontal and the maximum wind loads are the most important ones for describing the behaviour of the antenna in the wind flow. This is also the reason why they are both specified for a flow sector of ±45. This approach is further explained on the following pages. White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 5 of 16

Due to the fact that positive fluid mechanical effects occur for the frontal flow, the maximum wind load is obtained by multiplying the frontal load by a correction factor of 1.1 if the mathematical approach is used, see Table 1. This value was also confirmed by the wind tunnel tests. If test results are available, these values are used to specify the wind load of all the antennas with the same profile. For all other cases, the calculation is carried out according to the procedure explained above. Therefore, Kathrein uses the following procedure for determining the force coefficient: Calculation Measurement Frontal According to adapted standard Frontal measurement Maximum Calculated frontal wind load x 1.1 Measurement of the maximum in ±45 sector Table 1: Overview of c f determination THE ANTENNA IN THE WIND TUNNEL On the one hand, the calculation according to the standard is claimed to be conservative, on the other hand, it can only give values for a limited number of geometries. As the market has become much more sensitive with regard to wind loads, their values have been revised in 2016. The calculation algorithm has been refined but it is still based on the standard. To confirm the adapted values from a technical point of view, new tests were carried out in the wind tunnel at the Technische Universität Dresden. For calculations, Kathrein has up to now interpreted the standard conservatively. This resulted in the wind load values being higher than the ones obtained in wind tunnel tests. Aerodynamic properties The force coefficient determined in the wind tunnel is complex, as can be seen in Figure 5, p. 7 which shows the measurement for an antenna without a mast. White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 6 of 16

Figure 5 shows the airflow angle plotted in a circle and the respective c f value of the antenna plotted radially. This figure shows the properties of an antenna with relatively large rounded longitudinal edges. The following effects can be seen: 1,6 0 340 350 10 20 330 1,4 30 320 1,2 40 310 1,0 50 300 290 0,8 0,6 0,4 60 70 280 0,2 80 270 0,0 90 1. Calculating the wind load 230 220 with the actual calculation 210 200 190 method and fitted radii (blue 180 170 line) results in considerably reduced wind load values when compared to the old calculation method (black line). The fitted radii are shown in the appendix in Figure 10. The radii used for the calculations according to the current method are larger than those of the old method. This has a significant influence on the load reduction. The wind load measured in the wind tunnel (green line) confirms this reduction. 260 250 240 150 160 140 130 120 100 110 stand alone antenna measured in the wind tunnel acc. to old data sheet acc. to adapted algorythm schematic antenna cross-section Figure 5: Calculated force coefficient and measured total force coefficient with the same reference area 2. The wind load measured in the wind tunnel in the 0 330 340 350 320 1,0 direction, i.e. the frontal 310 0,8 direction, is much lower than the maximum wind load in the 300 290 0,6 0,4 280 0,2 sector of ± 45. All wind load 270 0,0 maxima of different antenna 260 profiles lie within this range; it is for this reason that this sector was chosen. Figure 6 compares 250 240 230 220 two antenna types with different 210 200 190 depth-to-width ratios. The force coefficient of the antenna with the higher depthto-width ratio is shown in yellow. At the 0 flow direction, a concavity typical for rounded profiles emerges. The higher the depth-to-width ratio of 1,2 0 10 20 30 40 140 150 160 170 180 the antenna, the larger the concavity. Approximately 20 away from the frontal wind direction, the wind load rises compared to the measured frontal wind load. The calculated wind load does not show concavity 50 130 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 antenna with a depth to width ratio of 0.51 antenna with a depth to width ratio of 0.45 schematic antenna cross-section Figure 6: Total force coefficient for two different antennas measured in the wind tunnel White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 7 of 16

effects. Compared to the frontal wind load calculated according to the standard, the calculated maximum wind load can be up to 10% higher. This explains why a factor of 1.1 is used for determining c f, compare Table 1, p. 6. The sole specification of the frontal wind load would thus be misleading for the customer when designing and dimensioning the mast. This is the reason why Kathrein also indicates the maximum wind load. 3. For the rear flow at about 180, a convexity emerges which represents a maximum in this sector. This is characteristic of antennas with a small longitudinal edge radius. The ideal antenna would have no minima and maxima in the wind load curve and a maximum wind load as low as possible. 4. The lift and drag forces due to the lateral flow acting on the antenna are responsible for the characteristic spikes at around 100 and 260. This effect is even more pronounced when the corner radii of the antenna are larger, in particular on the downwind side. An antenna with sharp longitudinal edges causes an early stall and, therefore, results in a considerably reduced lift. The more rounded the antenna is, the more pronounced the lift and drag forces become. Influence of the mast Figure 7 shows the impact of the mast on the wind load properties of the overall system consisting of both antenna and mast, as described in the standard case. 1. The mast has virtually no impact on the frontal airflow. 2. With regard to the rearside airflow, the mast causes a considerable reduction of the wind load of approximately 60%. 270 290 280 260 250 300 240 310 230 320 340 350 330 220 210 200 190 1,2 0 10 1 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0 180 20 30 150 160 170 40 140 50 130 60 70 120 80 90 100 110 antenna with mast measured in the wind tunnel stand alone antenna measured in the wind tunnel stand alone mast maximum total force coefficient in the ±45 sector section of the maximum load for the antenna with mast section with mast influence for the antenna wind load schematic cross-section of the antenna with mast Figure 7: Force coefficient of an antenna with mast White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 8 of 16

3. With regard to the lateral airflow in the sectors between 45 to 140 and 220 to 315, the mast is no longer in the slipstream of the antenna and considerably increases the cross-sectional area exposed to the airflow. This results in the formation of complex interference phenomena, which can lead to an elimination of the lift effects on the antenna. Thus, it is impossible to separate the wind loads of mast and antenna and the measured force coefficient diagram is, therefore, not significant for examining the force coefficient for lateral flow. Kathrein defines the wind loads for mast-mounted antennas, a condition common to most applications. The values for the frontal wind load and the maximum wind load stated in the data sheet make it possible to design a mast for the purpose mentioned above without having a specific value for the airflow from the rear. For antennas that are mounted on stub masts on the upper and lower mounting clamps, which means they do not have one continuous mast, it is recommended to increase the value of the maximum load by 20%. Compared to the standard case, this higher value arises because there is no positive effect from the mast. Conclusion The adapted data sheet values are determined by applying the valid standards and were additionally confirmed by wind tunnel testing. THE WIND LOAD AT ANTENNA SITES The wind loads stated in data sheets always refer to a reference wind speed of 150 km/h. This enables a direct comparison of the antennas with regard to their wind load. As all sites have site-specific wind speeds, it is necessary to calculate the load so that these wind speeds are taken into account: F Location = F 150 km/h ( v Location /v 150 km/h )² F w N v km/h Formula 4 White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 9 of 16

The site-specific load acting on an antenna depends on its geographic location, the location-specific factors, the orthometric height and the way the antenna is mounted on a mast. When configuring and dimensioning structures that are slim and can sway with the loads that are acting on them as masts in general are the dynamic reaction of the overall structure to the gustiness of wind is taken into account by using the following factor as an additional factor to Formula 1, p. 4 structural factor c s c d () or gust effect factor (TIA 222). Loads acting on antennas are also increased by this factor. When configuring antennas and their direct mounting equipment, these factors can generally be multiplied by 1 because antennas are usually more rigid than masts and, therefore, less prone to vibrations. It should be noted that it is the site structural engineer who is responsible for the correct calculation and interpretation of the wind load at the respective antenna site. The wind load values were determined under the test conditions described in this paper and serve as a basis for the values stated in the data sheets. It is strongly advised to refrain from using these values for the respective site without further verification. FAQ How can I work with these wind load values? The adapted values are technically verified values and can be used as before. The values are determined by means of a combination of calculation according to the standard and results obtained from wind tunnel testing. Can the wind load from the rear side be supplied as additional information? The wind load data relating to the rear side of the antenna does not need to be considered for setting up a mast-mounted antenna because this value is smaller than the frontal value. If a stand-alone White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 10 of 16

antenna is set up, the latest antenna profiles are expected to have a load that is 20% above the maximum wind load. Why are the wind load values suddenly so much lower? The calculation method was adapted so that it corresponds to the real values from the wind tunnel tests. However, the wind load values are still based on the calculation according to the standard and are scientifically confirmed. Two other changes have also been incorporated: Up to now, the load at 150 km/h was calculated according to the VDE 0855 standard (which has meanwhile been withdrawn) with a dynamic pressure of 1100 N/m². Applying an air density of 1.25 kg/m³ as recommended in results in a lower dynamic pressure of 1085 N/m². Connectors and fixtures are only considered for short antennas. TIA 222 permits plugs and fixtures to be disregarded as long as their wind load fraction is less than 10% of the one of the whole antenna. Besides the integration of RET in the antenna, with more compact plugs, and new fixture concepts for the new antenna series, the impact of these components has become negligible. Why have the wind loads been changed at this particular point of time? Up to now, Kathrein has used a conservative interpretation of the calculation according to the standard for data sheet values. Market demand and the fact that antennas are becoming ever larger have made it necessary to run wind tunnel tests and work on a better fitting method to determine the wind load values. White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 11 of 16

APPENDIX Different standards give different possibilities and approaches to calculate the wind load of antennas. Some examples: TIA 222 permits the load calculated for any direction, if the normal and lateral loads are given (based on sin 2 +cos 2 ) TIA 222 permits neglection of small irregularities, such as connectors or RCUs EN 1993-3-1 permits load reduction of the stand-alone antenna (shielding) The German national annex to EN 1993-3-1 recommends to apply the normal load at the same time in the lateral direction if lift forces are not known or specified standards for wind loading year region method covered shapes slenderness forces moment diversity of load and wind direction shielding TIA-329 2003 USA calculation round / flat no maximum no no no TIA-222 2005 USA calculation in absence of specific data round / flat yes every direction no no yes EN 1993-3-1 2007 EU wind tunnel all no every direction yes yes yes 2005 EU calculation round/flat/flat with curved edges yes orthogonal no no yes Table 2: Comparison of the standards for the wind load of base station antennas calculation measurement c f,0 ψ r ψ λ c f ψ λ frontal according to adapted to according to frontal measurement according to maximum calculated frontal wind load x 1.1 measurement of the maximum in the ±45 sector Table 3: Detailed determination of the values for wind load calculations White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 12 of 16

Calculation c f,0 acc. to Force coefficient = force coefficient of an infinite profile radii correction factor slimness correction factor Figure 9 ψ r acc. to Figure 11 Wind load = force coefficient projected area dyn. pressure F w = c f A ref q p c f = c f,0 ψ r ψ λ Projected area = length width or depth of antenna A ref = l A b A ψ λ acc. to Figure 12 with solidity ratio ϕ = 1 OR Measurement Dyn. pressure = ½ air density (1.25 kg/m³) wind velocity q p = ½ ρ v w 2 c f,0 ψ r from the measurement ψ λ acc. to Figure 12 with solidity ratio ϕ = 1 Figure 8: Calculation of the wind load according to Determination of the force coefficient When determining the force coefficient c f, there is a difference between 1. values and parameters from the standard and 2. measurement values obtained from wind tunnel tests. The force coefficient determined according to the standard uses the basis c f,0 (c f,0 of rectangular sections with rounded corners and without free end flow) in combination with the reduction factors Ψ r and Ψ λ. Ψ r considers the longitudinal edge radius of the antenna, Ψ λ the length-to-width ratio: c f = c f,0 Ψ r Ψ λ c f c f,0 Ψ r Ψ λ - - - - Formula 5 The determination of the force coefficient and the reduction factors is explained in Figure 8. White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 13 of 16

force coefficients c f,0 of rectangular sections with sharp corners and without free end flow 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 0,1 1 10 depth / width Figure 9: Force coefficient c f,0 of rectangular sections with sharp corners without free end flow according to Determining the reduction factor Ψ r for cross sections with rounded edges Wind tunnel tests have shown that the results obtained from the calculations according to the standard with the actual edge radii of the profiles are actually considerably higher than the real wind loads. In order to compensate for this, an effective radius is fitted into the surrounding rectangle. This radius is defined by the two tangential contact points with the surrounding rectangle and the first contact point with the profile. radius frontal radius rearside Figure 10: Improved radii for the calculation according to The dependence of the reduction factor Ψ r on the radius-to-width ratio is defined in as follows: 1 reduction factor Ψ r for cross-section with rounded corners 0,5 0 0,1 0,2 radius/width 0,3 0,4 Figure 11: Reduction factor Ψ r for a square cross section with rounded corners according to White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 14 of 16

Determination of the reduction factor Ψ λ for the free end airflow This slenderness curve describes the wind load as a function of the length-to-width ratio of the antenna. For wind loads based on wind tunnel tests, this curve is extrapolated for other antenna lengths. 1 end-effect factor ψ λ 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 1 10 100 length / width Figure 12: Reduction factor for the end-effect factor Ψ λ acc. to SOURCES DIN :2010-12 Eurocode 1: Einwirkungen auf Tragwerke - Teil 1-4 (Actions on Structures - Part 1-4): Allgemeine Einwirkungen Windlasten (General Actions - Wind Actions) DIN EN 1993-3-1:2010-12 Eurocode 3: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbauten - Teil 3-1 (Design of steel structures - Part 3-1): Türme, Maste und Schornsteine - Türme und Maste (Towers, masts and chimneys - Towers and masts) EIA/TIA-222-G:2005-08-02 Structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas NGMN-P-BASTA White Paper Version 9.6 Recommendation on Base Station Antenna Standards by NGMN Alliance White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 15 of 16

ABOUT KATHREIN Kathrein is a leading international specialist for reliable, highquality communication technologies. We are an innovation and technology leader in today s connected world. Our ability to provide solutions and systems enables people all over the world to communicate, access information and use media, whether at home, at the office or on the road. More Information: KATHREIN-Werke KG Anton-Kathrein-Straße 1-3 83022 Rosenheim, Germany Phone +49 8031 184-0 www.kathrein.com We cover a broad spectrum: from mobile communication and RFID solutions, to satellite reception, broadband and broadcast technology, to transmission and reception systems in vehicles. As a hidden champion and family-owned enterprise, we have been working on the technologies of tomorrow since 1919. We take pride in our dedicated employees and our passion for customers and quality. 99812755/01/17/MMG Subject to change. White Paper Base Station Antennas Reliable Wind Load Calculation January 2017 Page 16 of 16