Challenges to design and construction of cable cars in historic sites. Vila Nova de Gaia cable car.

Similar documents
Successful slope stabilization under severe conditions

What prompted the collapse of the Chirajara Bridge?

The Challenge of Wave Scouring Design for the Confederation Bridge

3. Types of foundation

Fig 2.17: Topographic model: snow-free area (Snow boundary = red) Contour interval of 1 m.

force tension suspension bridge anchorage cables compression caissons Towers deck

The New Anchor Post Product

FALL PROTECTION LADDERS ACCESSWAYS

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

Risk Assessment and Mitigating Measures Regarding Pile Installation at EBS Biohub Jetty

ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGE CONTAINER SHIPS

BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Engineering Response to. Workplace Accidents. Oregon Governor s Occupational Safety and Health Conference. Introduction

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

R.GRANDORI- SELI spa 1

INSTALLATION. USE AND MAINTEINANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COLLAPSIBLE COLUMNS WITH HAND BALANCED SYSTEM


Right Sizing VE Studies CSVA Conference. Markham, ON October 27, BRIAN RUCK, P. Eng., C.V.S. AECOM Canada

Splitting cylinder C20

Company. Quality and Certification. Manufacturing Programme

FALL PROTECTION PLAN INSTRUCTIONS

10m-130mm Tubular Tower. Technical Specifications

Product Range Trench Shoring.

Installation and Training Manual

sarens

MIRABAY PILOT PROJECT REPORT

Competent Person - Fall Protection Presented by Turner Safety- your instructor is Steve Turner


MSA Latchways Leading Edge SRL Self-retracting lifeline for horizontal and vertical use

USER MANUAL. Beach volleyball posts BEACH CHAMP ID:

Safety Tips from the WorkSafe People

C.V. INTERNATIONAL PLASTICS INC.

SET OF EUROLEAGUE BACKSTOP UNITS (Reference PK120)

Developmental Products

Vibrating Wire Load Cell (3, 4, 5 And 6 Gauge Cells) User Manual

Keller Williams Realty Marco Island

Non-Motorized Overpass at SR 5/US1

DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF THE SECOND SAIKAI BRIDGE A CONCRETE FILLED TUBULAR (CFT) ARCH BRIDGE-

Large container ships Builder s and operational risks John Martin, Managing Director, Gard (Singapore) Pte Ltd. 12 January 2016

Typical factors of safety for bearing capacity calculation in different situations

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

Edit this text for your title

Components for Pull Rope Systems. Leaflet No. Kiepe 680

Single slide rail system Linear shoring

TEKS Lesson 6.8E: Machines

An Analysis of Damaged Wind Turbines by Typhoon Maemi in 2003

Innovation and Safety Efficient Solution

SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF THE MANHATTAN BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS

Advantage Lockers & Bike

2.2. Anchorage Point A secure point of attachment for Lifelines, lanyards or deceleration devices.

Fall Protection Resource Guide P AGE 1

WORKING AT HEIGHT RESOURCE BOOKLET. Working at Height 1

Appendix J: Q1-Highway 35 Route Construction Plan

Mission Bridge Reconstruction

Getting a. Bridge Built

BiboBlock. Fall arrest system for flat roofs

Perched Box Caisson Overview. January 2014

Applications of trigonometry

TOWARD MORE ACCURATE PREDICTION OF DAMAGE DUE TO STRONG WINDS

WIND-INDUCED LOADS OVER DOUBLE CANTILEVER BRIDGES UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Yasuyuki Hirose 1. Abstract

KCRC Ma On Shan Line. Railway Development in Hong Kong. Tai Wai Station and Maintenance Centre

2016 Spring Fall Protection Construction Products

Basis of Structural Design

Civil Application Solutions

Guidance on piling, heavy loads, excavations, tunnelling and dewatering

DESIGN OF AXIALLY LOADED STEPPED FOOTING DATA :- SBC of soil =200 KN /m 2 Concrete Mix =M20 Steel Grade = Fe 415 Clear cover of bottom slab =50 mm

For a cantilever pile wall shown in Figure 1, assess the performance of the system and answer the following questions.

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Item 404 Driving Piling

GEA FOR ADVANCED STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

UNIFIED INTERPRETATIONS OF THE IGC CODE (AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION MSC.370(93))

At Home in the Urban Jungle Three WOLFF Cranes at the OMNITURM in Frankfurt's Banking District

Structural Design of Tank Weighing Systems

Sculpture Conservation Report

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Viaduct and bridge construction methods adopted at MTR SIL(E) Contract 903. MTR SIL(E) 903 Viaduct Construction Team

Tunnelling. Design Element Health Hazard Considerations Possible Solutions Linked to Ref No.

Fukushima Floating Offshore Wind Farm Demonstration Project ( Fukushima FORWARD )

SPORTS AND ENVIRONMENT 1 Dr. R. S. Brar and 2 Dr. Anju Pathak

EXHIBITION Guide. Roles and Responsibilities OS11. A handbook for exhibitors and contractors

Redesign of Motorized and Non-motorized Transport in Cities and Sustainable Mobility

Operating instructions IMMOOS Rescue Carriage Type C Type C+ 2 rollers

MAKE BOLLARD IMPACT RESISTANT PROTECT FOUNDATIONS RE-USE BOLLARD

SOIL ANCHORS ETSAB/UPC J.Llorens - ETSAB/UPC PASSIVE ANCHORS - ANTECEDENTS

Innovative and Robust Design. With Full Extension of Offshore Engineering and Design Experiences.

ROOFING FALL PROTECTION 27.I

Transport Infrastructure for Smart Cities in Hilly States

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

Low Wind High Yields Series

Fall Protection Guidelines. Individual Unit Function: Safety Procedure No.: SOP-0111 Page: 1 of 13. Preparer: Owner: Approver: Safety Safety Safety

Loads on Structures. Dead Load / Fixed Load Live Load / Imposed Load Earthquake Load Wind Load Snow Load

S-60-TO : 1 ton tower system INSTRUCTION MANUAL

Temporary load-bearing support for structural alterations or repairs

TRAVSMART permanent single-cable horizontal lifeline system

CASE STUDY OXLEY HIGHWAY SLIP STABILISATION

Aerodynamic Measures for the Vortex-induced Vibration of π-shape Composite Girder in Cable-stayed Bridge

We re good at what we do! Anywhere, TX SITE

Title- Fall Protection Effective Date: 03 Jan 14 Revision-0

CLOVER CLOVER. clover. Copyrights and patents Lappset Group Ltd

Transcription:

Challenges to design and construction of cable cars in historic sites. Vila Nova de Gaia cable car. Session 4: Sustainability of ropeways (Access to UNESCO World Cultural Heritage Sites by Ropeway) Sérgio Oliveira, Civil Engineer, Site Manager Email address: s.oliveira@etermar.pt, Phone +351 265 700 800, Fax +351 265 232 399 ABSTRACT Implementing a cable car project in an urban area is challenging due to the requirements to be fulfilled, such as architectural aspects, space available for the stations and towers construction and the flyby of the existing buildings. This particular project have had an additional specificity, it is located in the special protection area surrounding the UNESCO classified Historic Centre of Oporto, Luiz I Bridge and Monastery of Serra do Pilar classified by UNESCO as a World Heritage Cultural Site. This unique particularity had a significant impact on site physical's restrictions, both in terms of the space available and the top station s location.

Introduction Gaia cable car project arises from a public tender for Design, Construction and Operation, whose main purpose is to transport people by cable between the higher ground Jardim do Morro and the Douro river bank promenade, as shown below in picture 1 (Project s axis initial alignment yellow line). Top station Bottom station Location and description The cable car is located in the historic area of Vila Nova de Gaia. The top station is located near the Luiz I bridge upper deck, the metro station and also the Monastery of Serra do Pilar classified by UNESCO as a World Cultural Heritage Sites, while the bottom station is located near the Municipal Market and the wine cellars. This project have had this particularity of being located inside the special protection area surrounding and with its top station just on the limit of the Historic Centre of Porto World Heritage. In the image below there are represented: Classified World Heritage limits green line; Special Protection limite dotted red line; Project's axis alignment yellow line

Image source: http://whc.unesco.org Challenges and solutions The first and most significant challenge to the project was the need to change the top station s location to the hillside at a lower level compared to the initial one on the top of the Jardim do Morro (Morro Garden), as shown in the pictures below Plant / Profile and Aerial view of the cable way.

Top station Tower 2 Built Bottom station Project Bottom station and Tower 1 Tower 2 Top station and Tower 3 Top station Bottom station Tower 2 Cableway

Bottom station and Tower 1 Soil improvement foundation by pre loading techniques was taken into account, however, one of the main goals of the construction was to ensure that the foundation would not have future settlements that could put at risk the cable car once in operation. Bottom station Tower 1 Having taken this into account the station s foundation was built with Pile driving steel tubular 8 units with 30m deep. The tower 1 was built, similarly the bottom station, with 2 piles with 30m deep connected at their top level to the station with a concrete beam. All the surrounding building were monitored to vibrations induced by the pile driving process. Tower 2 (32m high) The foundation was design with pile driving (3units with 30m deep), however due to possible vibrations induced to the cellars old buildings and the possibility of ruin, during the construction works, it had to be changed micropiles (6 un with 30m deep).

Top station and Tower 3 Both stations were similar in architectural terms, although the need to change the top station s location, had as consequence an huge impact on the project as a whole. This singular change had a tremendous impact on the project as a whole, having as major consequence an increase on the station building volumetry and its cost. This small change led to big adjustments / changes in project and construction: - Four (4) buildings had to be demolished for the construction of the top station. The space on the hillside surrounded by old buildings, lack of space to put machinery to handle with the demolishinghe demolishing led to this work had been made by hand;

Demolished buildings (1 4) 1 and 2 3 3 4 - Rock excavation. Due to the urban surrounding area with buildings the rock excavation had to be done by non blasting method (Darda rock splitters and Excavator with Jackhammer); - Vertical face excavation stabilized with concrete wall, post tensioned anchors and shotcrete and ground nails;

Top station excavation (15m deep) and vertical excavation. Concrete wall and Post tensioned anchors - Concreting the roof after the equipment assembly, become a huge study to plan the flat formwork and support substructure with scaffold towers passing throughout the equipment.

During the excavation works for the implantation of the tower 3, what was supposed to be rock it turned out to be ordinary soil, therefore the foundation was connected to the top station building by 2 concrete beams.

Installation Technical main data and photos Technical main data: Drive station Return station Horizontal length Vertical rise Operating speed max. Capacity Travel time (max. speed) Number of cabins / carriers Cadence cabins Top station Bottom station 562 m 49,6 m 4,0 m/s 940 ppp 3,5 min 12 un 30 seg.

Bottom station

Top station

Conclusions This paper is intended to give an idea of the adversities and challenges involved in the development of a cable car project in an urban area, the way they were overcome and the changes needed to its completion. It is also intended to shed some light on how these kind of projects are subject to several risks related to its location on an urban area, still for more when talking about sites located beside UNESCO Heritage Cultural Sites. Ultimately, the changes introduced in a project might put at risk the viability of an installation and its operation due to an increase in costs and jeopardize its long term sustainability.