We encourage each of you to meet with us, the residential neighbors on the alley.

Similar documents
Sidewalk Cafe City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

See Figure 38, Existing Nonmotorized Connections.

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

3/20/2015 VIA . Teresa Haenggi, Associate Planner Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95811

12/13/2018 VIA

Village of Plainfield Design and Operational Guidelines for Outdoor Uses within the Public Right-of-Way

INTER- AND INTRA-CONNECTIVITY INTERPRETIVE GUIDELINES

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

Access Management Regulations and Standards

RE: Natomas Landing (P99-091)

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

The five potential solutions and some of their benefits and costs are listed in the following table: Ferry Patron Bike Parking Alternatives

Chapter BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

FIRE & LIFE SAFETY STANDARD

dpd Seattle Permits Tip Getting a Grip on Handrails PURPOSE OF HANDRAILS

11/28/2016 VIA

Compliance with Section 18-52(4) City of Thornton Development Code

This chapter describes the proposed circulation system and transportation alternatives associated with

Visit for more information, including the full 2017 program route.

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Existing Transportation System

Designed for Drivability

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

Three Springs Design Guidelines Fencing and Wall Standards

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

EXHIBIT R1. Neighborhood Cul-de-Sac Implementation

ITEM # 29 DATE: COUNCIL ACTION FORM ROAD CLOSURES FOR RAGBRAI ROUTE BACKGROUND:

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

WHEREAS delivery trucks also pass through the Narrows, into the northern parking lot, to loading docks in the back of the building.

CITY OF LUCAS 2014 MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

15 April CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE F o c us G r o up M o b ility

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

Project Launch Community Meeting 1 Summary

A Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement

Chapter 3.9 Timbercrest Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. November 2008

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. October 15, Mr. Bruce McBride Project Delivery Analysts, LLC Shawnee Street Moorpark, CA 93021

Driveway Design Criteria

Norton Shores Building Division 4814 Henry Street, Norton Shores, Michigan Telephone: (231) Pool Requirements

City of Lafayette Public Meeting Agenda Downtown Street Improvement Master Plan Implementation Committee Thursday, April 21, :00 PM

MEETING MINUTES CITY OF EUCLID PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (REGULAR MEETING) EUCLID MUNICIPAL CENTER - COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 14, :00 PM

1.3 Pedestrian Environments

NO LATER THAN ONE WEEK BEFORE YOUR PROPOSED CLOSURE START DATE

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

To: Planning Commission Date: September 19, 2012 From: By: Subject:

Community Meeting: Proposed Development 4520 Penn Ave. Notes January 30, :30-8:30pm

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

Unit Six: Driving Faster with More Risk URBAN, SUBURBAN, AND RURAL DRIVING

Ref. No February 19, Ms. Ashley Blissett, P. Eng., Senior Development Engineer City of Halifax PO Box 1749 HALIFAX NS B3J 3A5

Community Workshop #1 Summary October 2017

June 11, RE: Comments on the ENF for The Boston Garden project, MEPA # Dear Mr. Sullivan:

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

COUNCIL ACTION FORM SUBJECT: REQUESTS FROM AMES VELO FOR AMES GRAND PRIX

Subject: Bike Project Field Trial Must Validate Bike Safety Claims

East Burke Transportation, Safety and Capacity Improvements

Presentation to Media. February 27, 2008

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

Application for Temporary Street/Sidewalk Closure Permit

RE:comment on CF / Transportation Committee 7/27/11 Meeting I Apron Parking

WELCOME Public Information Centre

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

Sidewalk Café Ordinance Group Report

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy

Obey Creek PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION EAST WEST PARTNERS PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CREEK SIDE LANE SLIP STREET SCOTT MURRAY MAIN STREETS EAST/WEST

Access Management Regulations and Standards

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

Introduction...2. Multi-Modal Transportation Analysis TIA & Recommendations Design Proposal...3. Campus Pointe Development

canopy Ithaca The Commons by Hilton

[DRAFT] Bicycle Parking & Removal

Traffic Calming Policy

Chapter 3: Multi-Modal Circulation and Streetscapes

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

South End Transportation Study. Public Meeting. January 31, 2019 Welcome. Public Meeting. January 10, 2018 WELCOME

U.S. Equities Realty. Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal. Traffic and Parking Evaluation Fourth Presbyterian Church of Chicago Chicago, Illinois

ENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

10/6/2014 VIA . RE: Design Review for Delta Shores Regional Commercial Center (P14-025)

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

SECTION TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

Hot Tub Pre-Delivery Guide

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis B.3 Pedestrian Circulation and Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety

Transcription:

From: Shawn Edgington Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 11:22 AM To Subject: Hillstone DRB Meeting - letter to DRB Importance: High Hi Evan can you please forward this letter to the DRB members as well as including it in the red dot info for Wednesday s meeting? Dear DRB Members, We encourage each of you to meet with us, the residential neighbors on the alley. Although we are in support of Hillstone building and operating a restaurant where Bully s is currently located, we believe that this large project will have a significant negative impact on the alley and the neighbors if the noise, privacy and traffic issues are not addressed and solutions identified prior to DRB approval. We also think that a restaurant/bar project of this scale, with a history of being very popular and successful, potentially coming into Del Mar when the most recent large commercial project was 30 years ago, should be required to submit a construction plan and operations plan prior to approval. 1

Please read our concerns below and how they relate to several of the DRO s: 23.08.072 - Regulatory Conclusions Generally. B. The design will create a private or public nuisance. The design includes windows on the west side of the dining room/bar. The interior design specifies hard surfaces and high ceilings which will amplify the sounds of the busy and popular restaurant/bar with 120 seats for dining and bar. If the windows on the west side are operable, this noise will be directed toward the residential properties to the west of the alley and the residences beyond. The design of the parking structure with the entrance and exit located on the property line of the alley will increase traffic congestion cars, delivery trucks, trash trucks in the 20 foot wide alley. Additionally, there is a telephone pole in the alley located approximately 17 feet from the planter wall on their property line which is less than the 20 alley width that the code allows. Hillstone s Site Plan shows the location of telephone pole outside of the 20 wide alley which is not accurate. If restaurant/bar patrons are allowed access to the patio garden, the voices of these (possibly intoxicated) people will be right outside of our master bedroom window and will reverberate throughout the residential neighborhood to the west. Delivery trucks pulling into the parking lot to make deliveries and then BACKING OUT onto the alley will create a noise nuisance with beeping sound made when backing up D. The design will create an unreasonable invasion of the privacy of neighboring properties. J. The proposed development locates structures so as to unreasonably, adversely impact upon outdoor areas, excess noise, security concerns, parking and traffic congestion on adjacent properties. Refer to notes from B and D above. 23.08.074 - Regulatory Conclusions Traffic, Parking and Pedestrian Circulation. A. The vehicular or pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking, access points to the public streets, widths of interior drives, general circulation, separation of vehicular traffic, or arrangement of parking areas, is not safe; is not as convenient as reasonably practicable; detracts from the design of the proposed structure; or adversely impacts neighboring property. On page 69 of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, it is stated that there will be an additional 350 new vehicle trips per day at the project driveways and surrounding intersections. This means 2,450+ new vehicle trips per week and 10,616+ new vehicle trips per month in the alley and intersections. This increase in numbers of cars, trash trucks and delivery trucks in the alley will have a negative impact: traffic congestion in alley; limited access in and out of residents garages; delivery trucks backing out of parking lot with 20 wide alley for backing/turning radius 2

B. The design's traffic ingress, egress or internal traffic circulation will have an adverse effect on traffic conditions on abutting streets. Refer to notes in Item A of 23.08.074 above C. The design will create traffic hazards due to congestion, distraction of motorists or unsatisfactory access and egress. Refer to notes in Item A of 23.08.074 above F. The circulation systems will cause conflicts among vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian traffic. Refer to notes in Item A of 23.08.074 above Thank you for your time and consideration, Shawn and David Edgington Shawn Edgington, CIC President Granite Insurance Brokers/E-COMP Curated Compliance by Granite Real Freedom, LLC Founder, The Great American NO BULL Challenge, A Non-Profit Organization 6600 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 100, Pleasanton, CA 94566 Office: 925-462-8400 Direct: 925-249-2850 Fax: 888-739-9097 License #OC41366 www.graniteins.com www.curatedcompliance.com www.goecomp.com www.nobullchallenge.org Connect with me on LinkedIn 3

-----Original Message----- From: Joann Stricklin Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:12 PM To: Evan Langan <elangan@delmar.ca.us> Cc: Subject: The Hillstone Project Dear Evan, We just reviewed the letter from Glen Sage and Sara Howard that was directed to you and the Design Review Board regarding the Hillstone project. Of course, this project affects all of us who have property on the alley behind the proposed restaurant. We want you to know we share the same concerns and sincerely hope that you and the members of the board realize the traffic, noise, privacy issues, etc. that we will all face unless these concerns are addressed up front before this project is approved. We all look forward to a new restaurant in town but please have a plan to deal with these negative issues that will undoubtedly unfold and affect all of us unless you act now...before you start digging out the subterranean parking lot. Thank you for your time and attention to our letter. Sincerely, Jim and JoAnn Stricklin 1415 Stratford Court Sent from my iphone 1

From: Sarah Howard ] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 3:56 PM To: Evan Langan <elangan@delmar.ca.us> Cc: 'Glenn Sage' Subject: Hillstone DRB Meeting - letter to the board Hi Evan please forward this letter to the DRB members as well as including it in the red dot info for Wednesday s meeting. Thank you. Dear DMDRB Members, We have heard back from two of you regarding meeting in the alley behind my home at 1355 Stratford Court before the meeting on Wednesday. I encourage each of you to meet with us, the residential neighbors on the alley, because a picture is truly worth a thousand words. Although we are in support of Hillstone building and operating a restaurant where Bully s is currently located, we believe that this large project will have a significant negative impact on the alley and the neighbors if the noise, privacy and traffic issues are not addressed and solutions identified prior to DRB approval. We also think that a restaurant/bar project of this scale, with a history of being very 1

popular and successful, potentially coming into Del Mar when the most recent large commercial project was 30 years ago, should be required to submit a construction plan and operations plan prior to approval. Please read our concerns below and how they relate to several of the DRO s: 23.08.072 - Regulatory Conclusions Generally. B. The design will create a private or public nuisance. The design includes windows on the west side of the dining room/bar. The interior design specifies hard surfaces and high ceilings which will amplify the sounds of the busy and popular restaurant/bar with 120 seats for dining and bar. If the windows on the west side are operable, this noise will be directed toward the residential properties to the west of the alley and the residences beyond. The design of the parking structure with the entrance and exit located on the property line of the alley will increase traffic congestion cars, delivery trucks, trash trucks in the 20 foot wide alley. Additionally, there is a telephone pole in the alley located approximately 17 feet from the planter wall on their property line which is less than the 20 alley width that the code allows. Hillstone s Site Plan shows the location of telephone pole outside of the 20 wide alley which is not accurate. If restaurant/bar patrons are allowed access to the patio garden, the voices of these (possibly intoxicated) people will be right outside of our master bedroom window and will reverberate throughout the residential neighborhood to the west. Delivery trucks pulling into the parking lot to make deliveries and then BACKING OUT onto the alley will create a noise nuisance with beeping sound made when backing up D. The design will create an unreasonable invasion of the privacy of neighboring properties. The proposed podium mounted garden patio looks into our master bedroom and deck both on the 2 nd level of our house J. The proposed development locates structures so as to unreasonably, adversely impact upon outdoor areas on adjacent properties. Refer to notes from B and D above. 23.08.074 - Regulatory Conclusions Traffic, Parking and Pedestrian Circulation. A. The vehicular or pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking, access points to the public streets, widths of interior drives, general circulation, separation of vehicular traffic, or arrangement of parking areas, is not safe; is not as convenient as reasonably practicable; detracts from the design of the proposed structure; or adversely impacts neighboring property. On page 69 of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, it is stated that there will be an additional 350 new vehicle trips per day at the project driveways and surrounding intersections. This means 2,450 new vehicle trips per week and 10,616 new vehicle trips per month in the alley and intersections. This increase in numbers of cars, trash trucks and delivery trucks in the alley will have a negative impact: traffic congestion in 2

alley; limited access in and out of residents garages; delivery trucks backing out of parking lot with 20 wide alley for backing/turning radius B. The design's traffic ingress, egress or internal traffic circulation will have an adverse effect on traffic conditions on abutting streets. Refer to notes in Item A of 23.08.074 above C. The design will create traffic hazards due to congestion, distraction of motorists or unsatisfactory access and egress. Refer to notes in Item A of 23.08.074 above F. The circulation systems will cause conflicts among vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian traffic. Refer to notes in Item A of 23.08.074 above As always, thank you for your time. Sincerely, Glenn Sage and Sarah Howard 858-232-8762 3

To: Evan Langan, Associate Planner, City of Del Mar From: Kelly Wallace, Project Designer, Hillstone Restaurant Group Date: 11/10/2017 Subject: Delivery and trash summary for 1404 Camino Del Mar, R+D Kitchen DELIVERIES: All deliveries will are scheduled between 7:00 am and 11:00 am, as we do not accept deliveries during operational hours. Majority of deliveries are made Monday Friday with some occurring on Saturday. Because the site provides a substantial parking area at the alley level, deliveries will be instructed to pull into the parking area so as not to obstruct alley traffic. Smaller delivery trucks and vans will be able to pull through the covered portion of the structure to exit facing forward. Larger trucks without clearance to pass under the covered portion will have to exit by reversing into the alley. From an operational perspective, it is preferable for deliveries such as produce, fish, meat, and wine to be delivered at the entrance at Camino Del Mar when possible and permitable. The shortest travel distance between vehicle and kitchen or storage area is an abiding concern for a restaurant. Expected deliveries summary of trips Produce 2 companies, six days a week = 12 trips Seafood 2 companies, six days a week = 12 trips Meat 2 companies, twice per week. = 4 trips Chicken 1 company, three times per week= 3 trips Bulk Goods 1 company, twice per week. = 2 trips Dairy 1 company, twice per week =2 trips Wine and Liquor approximately 8 deliveries per week Tues Fri = 8 trips Wood twice per week = 2 trips Paper goods 1 company, twice per week =1 trips Linen 1 company, four times per week.=4 trips Expected number of deliveries each week is 50. Average about 9 deliveries a day/6 days a week. 147 SOUTH BEVERLY DRIVE BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 310.385.7343 WWW.HILLSTONE.COM

Notes on delivery truck sizes. Both seafood companies, one meat company and some of the liquor companies typically use van sized vehicles which are refrigerated. Linen company uses large walk in truck (similar to UPS/FedEX truck) Remainder of companies use box trucks in both 15 and 24 sizes. Delivery companies typically coordinate with other stops in the area limiting the amount of trucks. For example, the beer companies most likely only deliver to downtown Del Mar on certain days, and will make all their stops at one time. This will not add additional deliveries to the alley. The same applies to liquor/wine/produce/etc. WASTE: Our trash room has space for (2) 4 yard bins, one for recycling and one for trash. Additionally, we have 64 96 gallon roll carts for wet/green waste. Pick up of trash can be expected between 5 6 times a week. This is operated by Coastal Waste Management which runs waste management for Del Mar. PARKING MANAGEMENT: The parking lot will for guest and employees only. In hours of non operation, we intend to secure the lot with physical barriers (bollards, chains, etc.) The lot will be opened in the early morning to anticipate deliveries and our staff arrival. The restaurant is expected to be open to the public from 11:30 am until 11:00 pm. The parking areas and alley will be monitored with security cameras with recorded data backup. Standard operating procedure for our restaurants involve frequent management perimeter checks (typically for cleanliness and debris pick up). This will include the parking areas. See attached proposed signage plan.

BOX TRUCK LARGE WALK-IN TRUCK

Container Dimensions 35 Gallon Cart 39"H x 20"Wx 23"D 64 Gallon Cart 41.6"H x 26.7"W x 28"D 96 Gallon Roll Cart 45.7"H x 28.5"W x 33.7"D

Noise Prevention Signage Restaurant Level Floor Plan PLEASE CONSIDER OUR NEIGHBORS AND KEEP NOISE TO A MINIMUM Thank you exterior courtyard area and stairwell Please keep noise to a minimum when leaving to avoid disturbing our residential neighbors. Thank you. inside elevator

Noise Prevention Signage Alley Level Floor Plan PLEASE CONSIDER OUR NEIGHBORS AND KEEP NOISE TO A MINIMUM Thank you exterior alley wall and both stairwells Please keep noise to a minimum when leaving to avoid disturbing our residential neighbors. Thank you. inside elevator R+D KITCHEN KITCHEN R+D PARKING ONLY ONLY PARKING ALL OTHERS WILL BE TOWED along wall in parking garage

Camera Placement Restaurant Level Floor Plan

Camera Placement Alley Level Floor Plan