HCM 2010: ROUNDABOUTS. PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA

Similar documents
Updated Roundabout Analysis Methodology

Analysis of Signalized Intersections

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

Chapter Capacity and LOS Analysis of a Signalized I/S Overview Methodology Scope Limitation

February 8, Ms. Jamie Jun, Esq. Fromhold Jaffe & Adams 789 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 220 Villanova, PA 19085

Exam 2. Two-Lane Highway Capacity and LOS Analysis. Two-lane Highway Characteristics. LOS Considerations 10/24/2009

HCM Sixth Edition. Plus More. Rahim (Ray) Benekohal University of Illinois at Urban Champaign,

Basic Freeways and Multilane Highways (LOS) CIVL 4162/6162

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Maple Street in Lexington Signalized Intersection and Roundabout Comparison

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.

Intersection Control Evaluation

joint access drive. will be

A Comprehensive HCM 2010 Urban Streets Analysis Using HCS 2010 US 31W in Elizabethtown, KY

Roundabout Evaluations in Virginia: US 15/US 50 Gilberts Corner, VA SR 106/SR 634 Prince George County, VA

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Place Vanier 250 Montreal Road Transportation Impact Study Addendum. Prepared for Broccolini Construction September 20 th, 2012

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

Signalized Intersections

Methodology for analysing capacity and level of service for signalized intersections (HCM 2000)

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL 2010: NEW SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION METHODOLOGY. James A. Bonneson, Ph.D., P.E.

6.4.2 Capacity of Two-Way Intersections-HCM Method

Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

Volume-to-Capacity Estimation of Signalized Road Networks for Metropolitan Transportation Planning

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

I-95/Temple Avenue Interchange

Conversation of at Grade Signalized Intersection in to Grade Separated Intersection

FINAL REPORT Traffic Analysis Report Port Coquitlam Recreation Complex Port Coquitlam, BC

ANALYSIS OF SIGNALISED INTERSECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE PROCESSES APPLIED IN HUNGARY

URBAN STREET CONCEPTS

Intersection Control Evaluation

Roundabouts : A State of the Art in Germany

LIBERTY TREE ACADEMY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Traffic Academy: IJS & IMS FAQ/RULES OF THUMB

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Highway Capacity Manual 2010

William Castro Associated Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá, Colombia,

Capacity Evaluation Of Rotary Intersection In Kabul Afghanistan

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Signal Warrant Studies

James M. Moore, Director of Planning & Building Services, Town of Fairfax. Victory Village Senior Housing Development Traffic Study

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Actuated Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

Roundabout Model Calibration Issues and a Case Study

Analysis of Weaving, Merging, and Diverging Movements CIVL 4162/6162

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL

Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model (TBRPM v7.x)

MEASURING PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE) FOR LARGE VEHICLES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Vail Cascade Bar 11:50 PM There once was a designer with clout who designed a two-lane roundabout On its big debut a cyclist came through He got in bu

George Street Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

Unit 7 Speed, Travel Time and Delay Studies

Framework for Assessing a oundabout near a School Zone. resented by: Dusadee Corhiran, Dr. Emelinda Parentela, and Michael Plotnik

6. signalized Intersections

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Troutbeck Farm Development

A Review of Roundabout Speeds in north Texas February 28, 2014

USA Parkway Traffic Operations Analysis, Roundabout Option. Pedro Rodriguez, NDOT; Bryan Gant, Jacobs; Randy Travis, NDOT

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

Impact of Signalized Intersection on Vehicle Queue Length At Uthm Main Entrance Mohd Zulhilmi Abdul Halim 1,b, Joewono Prasetijo 2,b

Working White Paper on the Implementation of the Highway Capacity Manual 6 th Edition in Synchro

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION SOLUTIONS. Jay Bockisch, PE, PTOE Senior Associate

ATTACHMENT B: SYNCHRO HCM CAPACITY ANALYSIS OUTPUT

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Traffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama.

3 Department of Development Services Tim Snellings, Director Pete Calarco, Assistant Director

Roundabout Design 101: Roundabout Capacity Issues

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

2009 PE Review Course Traffic! STUDIES. Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP Crawford Bunte Brammeier Washington University

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Central Region Traffic Engineering On Call (Task Order ) Mini Roundabout Assessment Braddock Road & Pleasant Valley Road

Michigan Avenue Traffic Study

Roundabouts. By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University. February 19, 2015

HIGHWAY CONCEPTS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 12 CONTENTS

MEMO DRAFT VIA . Mr. Terry Bailey Foremost Development Company. To: Michael J. Labadie, PE Steven J. Russo, E.I.T. Fleis & VandenBrink.

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

NCHRP Project Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the HCM

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Travel Demand Management Plan

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

February 13, Mr. Chuck Marshall Stewart's Shops Corp. PO Box 435 Saratoga Springs, NY 12866

PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT

6TH AVE N/BENCH BLGS Phase II

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.

P HA Transportation Consultants

51. Uncontrolled Intersection

Intersection Improvement: Sturgeon Road, Silver Avenue and Murray Park Road Roundabout. Welcome. Public Information Session

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM VDOT Central Region On Call Task Order

Chapter 5 5. INTERSECTIONS 5.1. INTRODUCTION

Uncontrolled Intersection

Capacity and Performance Analysis of Roundabout Metering Signals

Transcription:

HCM 2010: ROUNDABOUTS PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA EMAIL: edarap@missouri.edu

OUTLINE Terminology used Input data needs Capacity of single and multilane roundabouts Roundabout analysis methodology 12-step procedure Compute average control delay/los for lanes, approaches, and entire roundabout intersection Compute expected queue length for each approach Exercise problem single-lane roundabout

TERMINOLOGY Ve entry flow rate Vc conflicting flow rate Vex exit flow rate

INPUT DATA NEEDED Number and configuration of lanes on each approach Either of the following: Demand volume for each entering vehicle movement and pedestrian crossing movement during the peak 15 min, or Demand volume for each entering vehicle movement and each pedestrian crossing movement during the peak hour, and a peak hour factor for the hour Percentage of heavy vehicles Volume distribution across lanes for multilane entries Length of analysis period (e.g., peak 15-min period within the peak hour)

SINGLE LANE ROUNDABOUTS Capacity of an approach depends on the conflicting flow rate c e,ppp = 1,130e 1.0x10 3 v c,ppp c e,ppp = lane capacity, adjusted for heavy vehicles (pc/h) v c,ppp = conflicting flow rate (pc/h)

MULTILANE ROUNDABOUTS More than one lane on at least one entry and at least part of the circulatory roadway Number of entry, circulating, and exiting lanes may vary HCM addresses Up to two circulating lanes Entries/exits can be either one or two lanes An additional right-turn bypass lane Capacity calculations depend on the lane configurations

TWO-LANE ENTRY, ONE CIRCULATING LANE Capacity of a two-lane entrance with conflicting flow in only lane c e,ppp = 1,130e 1.0x10 3 v c,ppp

TWO-LANE ENTRY, TWO CIRCULATING LANES Capacity for right and left lanes c e,r,ppp = 1,130e 0.7x10 3 v c,ppp c e,l,ppp = 1,130e 0.75x10 3 v c,ppp

CAPACITY VS CONFLICTING FLOW RATE

RIGHT TURN BYPASS LANES Different formulas for capacity when bypass lanes are present Two types of bypass lanes are included in HCM

ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 12 step approach (Steps 1-6) 1. Convert movement demand volumes to flow rates 2. Adjust flow rates for heavy vehicles 3. Determine circulating and exiting flow rates 4. Determine entry flow rates by lane 5. Determine capacity of each entry lane and bypass lane in passenger car equivalents (pce) 6. Determine pedestrian impedance to vehicles

ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 12 step approach (Steps 7 to 12) 7. Convert lane flow rates and capacities into vehicles per hour 8. Compute v/c ratio for each lane 9. Compute average control delay for each lane 10.Determine LOS for each lane on each approach 11.Compute average control delay and LOS for each approach and entire roundabout 12.Compute 95 th percentile queues for each lane

STEP 1 - CONVERT DEMAND VOLUME TO FLOW RATES v i = V i PPP v i demand flow rate for movement i (veh/h) V i demand volume for movement i (veh/h) PHF peak hour factor

STEP 2 - ADJUST FLOW RATE FOR HEAVY VEHICLES f HH = v i,ppp = v i f HH 1 1 + P T (E T 1) v i,ppp demand flow rate for movement i (pc/h) v i demand flow rate for movement i (veh/h) f HH heavy vehicle adjustment factor P T proportion of demand volume that consists of heavy vehicles E T passenger car equivalent for heavy vehicles

STEP 3 - DETERMINE CIRCULATING FLOW RATE

STEP 4 ENTRY FLOW RATE BY LANE Determine entry flow rates by lane Single lane entries sum of all movement flow rates using that entry Multilane entries depends on presence of bypass lanes, lane assignments for different movements Five lane assignments for two-lane entries 1. L, TR 2. LT, R 3. LT, TR 4. L, LTR 5. LTR, R

STEP 5 ENTRY CAPACITY BY LANE Determine entry lane capacities Use formulas previously discussed Capacity depends on number of entry lanes (EL) and conflicting circulating lanes (CL) Four possible combinations 1. 1 EL, 1 CL 2. 2 EL, 1 CL 3. 1 EL, 2 CL 4. 2 EL, 2 CL

STEP 6 DETERMINE PEDESTRIAN IMPEDANCE TO VEHICLES

ENTRY CAPACITY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR PEDESTRIANS CROSSING A ONE-LANE ENTRY

STEP 6 DETERMINE PEDESTRIAN IMPEDANCE TO VEHICLES

STEP 7 CONVERT LANE FLOW RATES AND CAPACITIES INTO VEHICLES PER HOUR v i = v i,ppp f HH,e c i = c i,ppp f HH,e f ppp v i demand flow rate for lane i (veh/h) v i,ppp demand flow rate for lane i (pc/h) f HH,e heavy vehicle adjustment factor for the lane (weighted average of adjustment factors for each movement entering roundabout weighted by flow rate) c i capacity for lane i (veh/h) c i,ppp capacity for lane i (pc/h) f ppp pedestrian impedance factor

STEP 8 COMPUTE VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO FOR EACH LANE x i = v i c i v i demand flow rate for subject lane i (veh/h) x i volume-to-capacity ratio of the subject lane I c i capacity for the subject lane i (veh/h)

STEP 9 COMPUTE THE AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY FOR EACH LANE d average control delay (s/veh) x volume-to-capacity ratio of the subject lane c capacity for the subject lane (veh/h) T time period (h) (T = 0.25 h for a 15- min analysis

STEP 10: LEVEL OF SERVICE Determine LOS for each lane on each approach using below table Control Delay LOS by Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (s/veh) v/c<=1.0 v/c>1.0 0-10 A F >10-15 B F >15-25 C F >25-35 D F >35-50 E F >50 F F

STEP 11 APPROACH AND FACILITY LOS Compute average control delay and determine LOS for each approach and the roundabout as a whole Approach delay: Weighted average of the delay for each lane on the approach weighted by the volume in each lane Intersection delay: Weighted average of the delay for each approach weighted by the volume on each approach

STEP 12 COMPUTE 95 TH PERCENTILE QUEUES FOR EACH LANE Q 95 95 th percentile queue (veh) x volume-to-capacity ratio of the subject lane c capacity for the subject lane (veh/h) T time period (h) (T = 1 for a 1-h analysis)

EXAMPLE PROBLEM SINGLE-LANE ROUNDABOUT WITH BYPASS LANES