Response to the Federal Aviation Authority. Makani Power, INC.

Similar documents
In parallel with steady gains in battery energy and power density, the coming generation of uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) will enjoy increased

Density of Individual Airborne Wind Energy Systems in AWES Farms

High altitude wind generation The Rotokite

TOPICS TO BE COVERED

POWERED FLIGHT HOVERING FLIGHT

Aerodynamic Terms. Angle of attack is the angle between the relative wind and the wing chord line. [Figure 2-2] Leading edge. Upper camber.

JAR-23 Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes \ Issued 11 March 1994 \ Section 1- Requirements \ Subpart C - Structure \ General

Can Wind Energy Be Captured in New York City? Case Study on Urban Wind based on a Feasibility Study by Orange Line Studio. Spark 101 Educator Resource

Flight Corridor. The speed-altitude band where flight sustained by aerodynamic forces is technically possible is called the flight corridor.

See the diagrams at the end of this manual for judging position locations.

SUBPART C - STRUCTURE

Low Flying Introduction

NSRCA Club or Novice Class. Maneuver Descriptions. And. Suggested Downgrades

INTRODUCTION TO FLIGHT (REVIEW, AEROSPACE DIMENSIONS, MODULE 1)

Subject: Structural Certification Criteria Date: 10/11/18 Policy No: PS-AIR for Antennas, Radomes, and Other External Modifications

VISUAL AIDS FOR DENOTING OBSTACLES

Wake Vortices OPERATIONS. Where do Wake Vortices come from? What are the characteristics of wake vortices? CLAUDE LELAIE Former Head of Flight Test

Homework Exercise to prepare for Class #2.

LECTURE 18 WIND POWER SYSTEMS. ECE 371 Sustainable Energy Systems

Case studies from classes led by Dr. Ron Fulbright, University of South Carolina Upstate. INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS A BETTER KITE

V MW Offshore leadership

Preliminary Research on Modelling and Control of Two Line Kites for Power Generation

Preliminary Analysis of Drag Reduction for The Boeing

Related Careers: Aircraft Instrument Repairer Aircraft Designer Aircraft Engineer Aircraft Electronics Specialist Aircraft Mechanic Pilot US Military

Chapter 3: Aircraft Construction

Designing a Model Rocket

PRIVATE PILOT MANEUVERS Practical Test Standards FAA-S A

A103 AERODYNAMIC PRINCIPLES

IIIYEAR/VISEMESTER ME2023 RENEWABLE SOURCES OF ENERGY UNIT II WIND ENERGY

Howard Torode. Member of General Aviation Group and Chairman BGA Technical Committee

Wind Energy Technology. What works & what doesn t

Aerodynamics Principles

THE AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT Issue /07/12

Sportsman (401) Maneuver Descriptions. And. Suggested Downgrades

Centre for Offshore Renewable Energy Engineering, School of Energy, Environment and Agrifood, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK 2

VI.B. Traffic Patterns

BASIC AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES

NORMAL TAKEOFF AND CLIMB

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS

A child places a car of mass 95 g on the track. She adjusts the controller to a power of 4.2 W so the car accelerates from rest for 0.40 s.

Flying High. HHJS Science Week Background Information. Forces and Flight

XI.C. Power-Off Stalls

My Background. Joe Wurts 1

Job Sheet 1 Blade Aerodynamics

Wind turbine Varying blade length with wind speed

Teaching Landings by the Numbers: Quantifying the Visual Approach and Landing

LESSONS 1, 2, and 3 PRACTICE EXERCISES

Exploration Series. AIRPLANE Interactive Physics Simulation Page 01

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

VII.E. Normal and Crosswind Approach and Landing

DEFINITIONS. Aerofoil

No Description Direction Source 1. Thrust

SCHEMATIC MANEUVER DIAGRAMS. AMA Sportsman

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

Wave Energy Converters (WECs)

Wave Energy. ME922/927 Wave energy

T U R B I N E W I N D T I C A L 2009 design manual V E R

Aerodynamic principle

WINDSWEPT & INTERESTING LTD

Basic Fluid Mechanics

Efficiency Improvement of a New Vertical Axis Wind Turbine by Individual Active Control of Blade Motion

THE HORNS REV WIND FARM AND THE OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE WIND FARM MAIN CONTROLLER

Anemometry. Anemometry. Wind Conventions and Characteristics. Anemometry. Wind Variability. Anemometry. Function of an anemometer:

Innovative and Robust Design. With Full Extension of Offshore Engineering and Design Experiences.

Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Aerodynamics #2 AAE-451 Aircraft Design

VI.B. Traffic Patterns

6.7 Aircraft Protection

CESSNA 172-SP PRIVATE & COMMERCIAL COURSE

The Marking of Offshore Wind Farms. Provide guidance for a response to IALA. M-4 B445.8 &.9 (& B for on-shore wind farms).

Circuit Considerations

XI.B. Power-On Stalls

THERMALLING TECHNIQUES. Preface

Exploring Wind Energy

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BARGE FLOATER WITH MOONPOOL FOR 5 MW WIND TURBINE

How to Do Flight Testing for TARC. Trip Barber NAR TARC Manager

CHAPTER 9 PROPELLERS

The Fly Higher Tutorial IV

LEVEL FOUR AVIATION EVALUATION PRACTICE TEST

Long-Term Laddermill Modeling for Site Selection

PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT

Aerodynamics of Flight

Aerodynamically Efficient Wind Turbine Blade S Arunvinthan 1, Niladri Shekhar Das 2, E Giriprasad 3 (Avionics, AISST- Amity University, India)

Ottawa Remote Control Club Wings Program

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

Aero Club. Introduction to Flight

LAPL/PPL question bank FCL.215, FCL.120 Rev PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT 080

An Investigation of Dynamic Soaring and its Applications to the Albatross and RC Sailplanes

Aerodynamic investigation of Winglets on Wind Turbine Blades using CFD

Transportation Engineering II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

V mca (and the conditions that affect it)

ROAD MAP... D-1: Aerodynamics of 3-D Wings D-2: Boundary Layer and Viscous Effects D-3: XFLR (Aerodynamics Analysis Tool)

PERFORMANCE MANEUVERS

Basic Mountain Flying

Wake Effects from Wind Turbines

Civil Air Patrol Auxiliary of the United States Air Force

AE Dept., KFUPM. Dr. Abdullah M. Al-Garni. Fuel Economy. Emissions Maximum Speed Acceleration Directional Stability Stability.

Wind tunnel effects on wingtip vortices

C-130 Reduction in Directional Stability at Low Dynamic Pressure and High Power Settings

Numerical Simulation And Aerodynamic Performance Comparison Between Seagull Aerofoil and NACA 4412 Aerofoil under Low-Reynolds 1

Preliminary design of a high-altitude kite. A flexible membrane kite section at various wind speeds

Transcription:

Response to the Federal Aviation Authority Docket No.: FAA-2011-1279; Notice No. 11-07 Notification for Airborne Wind Energy Systems (AWES) Makani Power, INC. Makani Power is committed to working with the FAA to create a safe and open NAS that allows for the operation of Airborne Wind Turbines (AWT). As a leader in the field of airborne wind energy, Makani is eager to begin collaborating with the FAA on regulation and safety procedures, further enabling the development of the AWT. 2.1 The Makani Power AWT The AWT operates on many of the same principles as a conventional turbine blade but incorporates only the most effective part: the aerodynamically effective blade tips. In a conventional wind turbine, the last 25% of the blade is responsible for more than half of the energy production. The Makani wing mimics the motion of these blade tips using only a fraction of the materials: there is no tower, hub, nacelle and only one blade. The wingspan of a Makani AWT is comparable in size to one blade of a similarly scaled traditional wind turbine. Power is generated by several turbines mounted on the wing. These turbines are small, lightweight and operate without gearboxes (direct drive) as they extract power from the high speed airflow moving across the wing. The AWT is materials efficient: its wingspan is comparable in size to one blade of a similarly scaled turbine and there is no tower, hub, nacelle, or gearbox. The tensile based design of the Makani AWT further decreases mass by distributing aerodynamic forces across the wing with a bridle. The Makani AWT is fully autonomous. Like an airplane, the path of the AWT is directed by flaps on the wing controlled by an onboard computer. The AWT has a proven ability to perform the modes of flight needed for complete autonomous operation. In field testing Makani has demonstrated: take-off, hover, transition into crosswind, crosswind power generation, transition out of crosswind, reeling in and perching. 1 Before launch, and in unfavorable conditions, the wing is stowed at the top of the spar buoy. 2 The wing launches and lands by hovering like a helicopter. 3 In operation, the wing flies in a circular path at an altitude of 400 m. Figure 1. Makani AWT flight modes. 1

2.2 The Advantages of the AWT For the wind energy industry to flourish and to make low cost renewable energy a reality, three issues must be solved: Consistency of generation Material efficiency Useable land Makani s AWT can overcome the limitations of conventional wind energy by reaching the stronger and steadier winds at altitude. In addition, the AWT achieves substantial improvements in low-wind performance because the entire span of the wing operates at the tip speed of a conventional turbine. This increases the power generation of each turbine and opens up more areas of economically viable wind resource. In the continental United States alone, AWTs can economically access over five times the land area available to conventional wind turbines. The AWT s low mass means that it can also be sited far offshore in deep water, anchored by a floating platform. 2.3 The Makani Airframe Current prototype Wing 7 Specs Rated power: 20 KW Full rated power wind speed: 10 m/s Operational altitude range: 40 m - 110m Circling radius: 40 m Wing Wing spar: carbon fiber Wing skin: carbon fiber Wing mass: 60 kg Generation system: 4 brushless DC motors 3 m Tether Structure: Dyneema Conductor: copper Length: 144 m Mass: 16 kg Voltage: 1.1 kv 400 m (1300 ft) Standoff area Preferred Turbine Setback 144 m (470 ft) Tether mount Operational area 8 m Wing 7 is mechanically and aerodynamically representative of the proposed utility scale AWTs, the M600 and M5. Wing 7 is a development platform used to test system dynamics. Review of test data and flight dynamics is critical in developing this technology. The final system design may differ from that of Wing 7 as we use it to learn more about the technology. In the Makani system the primary source of lift is the wing itself, which currently has a 26 ft. (8m) wingspan. The operational dimensions are a hemisphere with the tether mount located in the center and a radius the length of the tether (144 m/470 ft.). There is an additional safety zone of 1,310 ft (400 m) from the tether mount. Prevailing wing direction Figure 2. Diagram of the operational dimensions of Wing 7 and the safety setback for testing. 2

Length: 144 m Mass: 16 kg Voltage: 1.1 kv 8 m Proposed Final Systems M600 Specs Rated power: 600 kw Full rated power wind speed: 9m/s Operational altitude range: 140m - 310m Circling radius: 135 m Wing Wing spar: carbon fiber Wing skin: e-glass Wing mass: 1,050 kg Generation system: 8 brushless DC motors 8 m Tether Structure: pultruded carbon fiber Conductor: aluminum Length: 440m Mass: 250 kg Voltage: 8 kv 28 m The M600 is a 600 kw, utility scale device meant for onshore wind farm applications. The operational dimensions are a hemisphere with the tether mount located in the center and a radius the length of the tether (440 m/ 1,440 ft.). There is an additional safety zone of 5,000 ft. (1.5 km) from the tether mount. 15 m 15 m 65 m 65 m M5 Specs Rated M5 Specs power: 5 MW Full Rated rated power: power 5 MW wind speed: 9 m/s Operational Full rated power altitude wind range: speed: 350m 9 m/s- 650 m Circling Operational radius: altitude 265 mrange: 350m - 650 m Circling radius: 265 m Wing Wing spar: carbon fiber Wing skin: spar: e-glass carbon fiber Wing mass: skin: e-glass 9,900 kg Generation Wing mass: system: 9,900 kg8 brushless DC motors Generation system: 8 brushless DC motors Tether Structure: Tether pultruded carbon fiber Conductor: Structure: pultruded aluminumcarbon fiber Length: Conductor: 1,060 aluminum m Mass: Length: 3,660 1,060 kgm Voltage: Mass: 3,660 8 kvkg Voltage: 8 kv The 5 MW, M5 is a utility scale device developed specifically for deep water offshore locations greater than 15 miles from shore. The operational dimensions are a hemisphere with the tether mount located in the center and a radius the length of the tether (1,060 m/3,480ft.). There is an additional safety zone of 5,000 ft. (1.5 km) from the tether mount. 3

Proposed Farm Layout 1.5 km (5,000 ft) 440 m (1,440 ft) Tether mount Operational area Safety Set Back Perimeter: AWTs will be spaced a distance of one tether length apart in a hexagonal pattern. Safety setbacks will be based on the level of hardware value and damage probability. A setback of 5,000 ft. (1.5 km) from any trunk power lines and public roads should be used, while one tether length from any other turbine in the downwind half of the hemisphere is sufficient. Sound Set Back Perimeter: 5,000 ft. (1.5 km) from the property perimeter. Standoff area Prevailing wing direction Figure 3. Diagram of the operational dimensions of the M600 and the proposed setback for a single turbine. In a farm setup each turbine only needs to be a single tether lentgh 1,440 ft. (440 m) apart but there will be a setback around the entire farm of 5,000 ft. (1.5 km). 2.4 Marking and Lighting Current prototype The current Makani Power prototype, Wing 7 cannot comply with the lighting requirements in Part 77 due to the mass and drag of the lights. If night flying was permitted the wing could be floodlit from the ground, similar to moored balloons and kites (AC 70/7460-1K chapter 11). However, floodlighting does not give good visibility at all angles. A better option would be to add LED aviation lights to the wing tips, similar to a light aircraft. Wing 7 is currently painted orange and yellow, see the image below. Figure 4. Wing 7 at Makani s test site in Alameda,CA, January 2012. The wingtips and tail of Wing 7 are painted yellow on the starboard side and orange on the port side for visibility to the pilot, testing team and any possible bystanders. 4

Proposed Final Systems Wing: Makani anticipates the use of onboard lighting that flashes at the top and bottom of each loop, emulating a stationary radio tower and making the obstacle conspicuous to pilots. The wings of both the M600 and the M5 can comply with the Part 77 lighting requirements as written. However, the addition of lighter aviation grade lighting, such as the Flight Light L-864, would improve the performance of the wing. The wing itself will be painted white in a similar manner to wind turbine blades. This lighting and marking scheme would provide visibility similar to existing structures. Tether: Tether drag is debilitating to the AWT s performance and increasing tether drag will prevent the system from achieving the large reductions in cost of energy offered by the airborne approach. Tether marking also encumbers the tether and endangers the system during launching and landing. For these reasons, Makani proposes not marking or lighting the tether and instead marking both the wing and the ground station. As can be seen in the image below, the AWT tether is similar in length and spread to radio tower guy wires. Lighting the wing like a radio tower creates a comparable area of perceived, and therefore avoidable, risk around the system. Required lighting Radio tower guy wire Perceived guy wire Outer bounds of tether Area outside perceived guy wire Conventional Wind Turbine Airborne Wind Energy System Radio Tower Figure 5. When lit Airborne Wind Turbines would resemble radio towers. The area outside of the perceived guy wire area is much smaller than that for conventional wind turbines, suggesting that pilots accustomed to the markings on radio towers would safely avoid AWTs marked in this fashion. Wind Farm In a farm setting, Makani proposes to light the wings in the manner of a traditional wind farm, with lights on the wings at the perimeter of the farm and on those on high spots. 2.5 Safety Current Testing Safety Pilot control: While the system is autonomous, a ground based pilot can override the controls at all times. Tether failure: The tether is built to a higher safety factor than the rest of the wing so that the tether would not be the first component to break. However, in the event of tether failure, the pilot can land the wing. Testing location: Makani tests on unoccupied land where bystanders can be kept 1,300 ft (400 m) from the ground station, outside the operational zone and the safety buffer. NOTAMS are issued for every test. 5

Final System Safety Multiple layers of safety and redundancy have been integrated into the Makani Wing 7 prototype and the proposed utility scale systems. The Makani AWT is unique from other obstructions in that it can, in a matter of seconds, transition from circular flight to stationary hover and minutes later hover back to a groundstation at ground level. This enables single systems or farms of AWTs to react quickly to emergency situations. System Failure: The structural health of the AWT is monitored by an independently powered watchdog system that senses tether impedance and altitude. The watchdog system is active during crosswind flight, and if there is a structural or navigation failure, it activates a ballistic parachute [1]. The wing stays on the tether and is winched in after parachute deployment, remaining aloft even in low wind conditions. Tether Failure: The tether is designed to operate at a higher safety factor than the wing, and tether failure will be avoidable due to airborne and ground based force sensors that can detect failure in individual segments of the tether. However, if a full structural tether failure occurs, the onboard navigation system has backup battery power and can force the wing to land at a predetermined location within the operational area. In the event of both sensor and tether failure, the untethered aerodynamics of the wing dictate that it will come to the ground within the operational zone even in high-wind conditions. Aircraft: Commercial aircraft: During cruise, commercial aircraft fly more than 20,000 feet above the maximum altitude of an AWT array. AWT farms will be located far enough from airports to avoid any potential interaction. Small aircraft: AWTs will lit in a manner similar to radio towers, making them conspicuous to pilots. If a small aircraft is detected entering the array, the monitoring system will force the AWT array to transition into stationary hover within ten seconds. Systems can be retrieved to ground level within 5-10 minutes after this transition. Elevation: Peak elevation is limited to the tether length. Even in the case of a tether failure during upward, high-speed crosswind flight, the kinetic energy of the untethered (unpowered) AWT is insufficient to overcome aerodynamic drag to exceed the tether elevation. The aerodynamics of the system dictate that the wing only gains energy from the wind by pulling against the tether. Lightning Strikes: Makani will follow standard practices within the aviation and utility industries for surge protection, shielding and grounding. The wing will meet the lightning strike standard defined in military specification MIL-STD 464-A. Figure 6. Wing 7 flying at the Sherman Island, CA test site, September 2011. Makani s Wing 7 is being developed with a Phase I ARPA-E grant awarded for transformational energy research. 6

Bird Strikes: While bird strikes are unlikely due to the sparse presence of fauna at its flight altitude, the AWT is designed to withstand an average of 1.5 strikes every year [2]. The AWT s rotor blades are built with a very high factor of safety and are designed to withstand strikes. In the event of a rotor failure, the 8-rotor AWT can suffer multiple rotor losses without compromising safe operations. Wind Farm Safety Several safeguards will be in place to ensure safety in a utility scale wind farm: AWTs will be spaced a distance of one tether length apart in a hexagonal pattern A Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system will control the entire farm and collect data on the health of the array The array may be landed in its entirety at the discretion of the system operator through the SCADA system in response to: Extreme weather events Grid requests Ground or aviation requirements A standoff of 5,000 ft. (1.5km) will surround the entire farm Wings may be automatically landed if an aircraft enters the standoff area around the array. Within ten seconds the array can transition into stationary hover and within seven minutes all AWTs can return to their perches. This operations strategy is similar to existing on and offshore wind farms. 2.6 Impacts to NAS Facilities Induced Flow and Turbulence Single AWT: A single Makani AWT will have a negligible wake effect because, in contrast to traditional wind turbines, the Makani AWT slows a large volume of air a small amount. Successive wakes from a single AWT should not interact, suggesting that the empirical wake models developed for commercial airline safety on takeoff and landing are suitable to describe AWT wakes. Figure 7. A composite image of a single Wing 7 prototype demonstrating the flight path of the wing during crosswind flight, Sherman Island, CA, June 2011. Additionally, the downwash from an AWT is at an angle of 90 degrees to vertical and interacts with conventional aircraft as an increase in horizontal turbulence. This is typically much less significant than vertical turbulence and more easily rejected 7

by aircraft penetrating the center of the AWT wake. The downwash from a typical AWT at its first power point, where the downwash per unit time is largest, is about 1/6th of wind speed (the first power point is typically 9-10 m/s), or 1.5 to 1.6 m/s. This is dramatically less than the typical gust profile seen at terrestrial wind sites. Farm of AWTs: In a farm environment the wakes of each AWT should not interact due to the separation of systems and the rate of vorticity decay. Like an aircraft, an AWT sheds counter-rotating vortices at each wingtip. In the region between the wakes, a downwash is created by the combination of superimposed convections due to the two vortices. On either side of the vortices, the convections neutralize each other, resulting in a fast decay of any external wake. This is the steady-state convection model of a wake. In reality, one vortex will convect the other. This leads to instability, in which vorticity transfer from one vortex to the other eventually destroys both vorticities. In general, highly symmetric vortex pairs in the absence of ambient turbulence decay exponentially with a time constant related to viscosity. In ambient turbulence, such as wind, increased eddy or transport viscosity results in increased energy transfer and creates asymmetries, which grow exponentially and destroy the vortex pair. Empirical data on this relationship is described in the non-dimensional time unit: For typical atmospheric turbulence and stratification levels, decay of vorticity to 0.1 of the initial value occurs on the range of 5<t*<10 [3]. On the M600, with b~27, C_L~2, and A~35: t = 2.2 t*, suggesting that decay to 10% of the initial value occurs in between 11 and 22 seconds. Given a system separation of roughly 500 meters and a rated wind speed of 9 m/s, t*=25 when the wake from an upwind AWT interacts with a downwind AWT. This is far longer than the decay time typically seen in normal atmospheric turbulence, suggesting low interaction. Aircraft Interaction: Under normal circumstances the impact on aircraft from a farm or single AWT, in the form of increased turbulence or a gust, should be negligible because the turbulence is small and in the direction of horizontal flight. Radar Makani will be conducting an analysis of the system s radar cross section during 2012/13 and if necessary Makani will change the wing s material to reduce its radar cross section. Makani will complete real world radar testing as soon as feasible. Communications Makani does not believe there to be impacts to any communication or navigation system supporting the NAS from AWTs. 8

Siting AWTs have increased siting flexibility (as opposed to conventional wind turbines), allowing them to be sited away from NAS facilities. 2.7 Testing Needs Current Testing Makani will comply with all FAA requests: Airborne operations of AWES should be temporary in nature for testing and data collection purposes only Single AWES devices only (e.g. no farms or multiple simultaneous testing) AWES should be limited to a single fixed location (e.g. no mobile ground facilities Testing is confined to heights at or below 499 feet above ground level (AGL) Airborne flight testing of AWES will only occur during daylight hours AWES will be made conspicuous to the flying public through NOTAMS. Upcoming Testing Needs To ensure the safety of AWTs, in depth reliability testing will need to be performed, starting within the next year. Within the next year Makani will need to test: At night Over long periods of time (weeks, months) Within the next two years Makani will need to test: Up to 2,000 feet AGL Multiple system farm environments Figure 8. Makani s testing team carries Wing 7 to the test site at Sherman Island, CA, June 2011. Makani Power is a leader in airborne wind energy technology and has a proven track record of technical accomplishments, including high speed, autonomous flight; power generation and fully autonomous flight using a sophisticated set of components designed and built by Makani. 9

2.8 References 1) BRS Aerospace, Parachute Specifications: accessed on January 7, 2010. http://www. brsparachutes.com/files/brspara chutes/files/brs%206%20specifications.pdf 2) Sovacool, BK. Contextualizing Avian Mortality: A Preliminary Appraisal of Bird and Bat Fatalities from Wind, Fossil-Fuel, and Nuclear Electricity, Energy Policy 37(6) (June, 2009): 2241-2248. 3) Holzapfel, F. Probabilistic Two-Phase Wake Vortex Decay and Transport Model, Journal of Aircraft, Volume 40 #2, 2003: 323-331 10