Gadsden Etowah Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)

Similar documents
Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Prepared For: DIRECTION 2035 SHAPING OUR FUTURE SUMMARY REPORT JULY Prepared By: Staff to Bay County TPO

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.

Multi Modal Transit Access Plan KIPDA ID # 239. Project Type: STUDY

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Memorandum. Purpose: To update the MPO CTAC on the status of the LRTP scenario evaluation process.

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

APPENDIX D: Southwest Volusia Regional Transportation Study. Evaluation Criteria FINAL

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

GOAL 2A: ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

Bikeway Plan for the Roanoke Valley Area MPO Update ACKWOWLEDGEMENTS

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Portland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

Route 7 Corridor Study

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Scope of Services BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MPO

Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Cost Feasible Plan Report BAY COUNTY 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

City of Bartow Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Element

NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

2.0 Existing Conditions

Key Findings & Corridor Highlights

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Welcome to Laredo Metropolitan Transportation Plan First Public Meeting. February 27 th, :30 PM to 7:30 PM. We value your opinion!

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

REGIONAL PRIORITIES Presentation to the Tampa Bay Regional Collaboration Committee September 10, 2012

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Financial Project ID No(s).: and ETDM No(s).: and 14181

2014 Wisconsin Tribal Transportation Conference. Matt Halada Transportation Planner NE Region

Advanced Transit Oriented Developments (ATODs) - Defined

LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION MODELING IN THE BRISTOL URBANIZED AREA March 2008

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2012

3.0 Future Conditions

FY STIP. Austin District. November Quarterly Revisions HIGHWAY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

Sandy Transportation System Plan. Prepared for

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Kankakee County Transportation Initiatives

ARRENTON RANSPORTATION

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Policy 101. Vision & Context Project Development Funding

Section 9. Implementation

FAYETTE COUNTY. Fayette County Active Transportation Profile REGIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Needs Plan Report BAY COUNTY 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Springdale Chamber of Commerce Leadership Springdale Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study (KATS) Complete Streets Policy Approved: Effective: FY 2018 Projects

Most Important Part of any Plan

Funding Sources Appendix I. Appendix I. Funding Sources. Virginia Beach Bikeways and Trails Plan 2011 Page I-1

HUNTSVILLE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FINAL

Chapter 7 TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES ELEMENT INTRODUCTION

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Congress Avenue. Palm Beach MPO Subcommittee Meetings December 2017

FMATS Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized Project Nomination Form

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

CHARLOTTE COUNTY PUNTA GORDA MPO

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

CARTERSVILLE-BARTOW METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM,

OTO BIKE/PED PLAN REPORT

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Staunton. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

A. LETTERS OF SUPPORT ON THE WYTHE CREEK ROAD WIDENING PROJECT

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENLO PARK ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Arterial Management Plan for US Route 250 and State Route 623

STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Project Description Form 6V

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Prioritizing Transportation Policy and Funding for Active Transportation, Safety, Equity and Health

Transcription:

Gadsden Etowah Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Amendment #1 Year 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan This document is posted at: http://www.cityofgadsden.com For further information, please contact Meinrad Tabengwa, City of Gadsden City of Gadsden Planning Department Email: mtabengwa@cityofgadsden.com Date Adopted: This report was prepared as a cooperative effort of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the Alabama Department of Transportation, and the Gadsden Etowah Metropolitan Planning Organization. This document is produced by the Planning Division of the City of Gadsden, Alabama as staff to the Metropolitan Planning Organization, in fulfillment of requirements set forth in Title 23 USC 134 and as amended by Public Law 109 59 SAFETEA LU 2005. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

1. INTRODUCTION The Gadsden Etowah 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) fulfills the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) requirements of United States Code Title 23, Section 134 and Title 49, Section 5303 and Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 450 for transportation plans. Metropolitan planning is required for areas designated urbanized by the U.S. Census where population exceeds 50,000 persons. Each metropolitan area shall have, A continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process that results in plans and programs that consider all transportation modes and supports metropolitan community development and social goals. These plans and programs shall lead to the development and operation on an integrated, Intermodal transportation system that facilitates the efficient, economic movement of people and goods (23 CFR 450.300). The LRTP is a result of the metropolitan planning process. Specific LRTP requirements are specified in Title 23, Section 450.322 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Major elements of a long range MPO plan are as follows: Addresses a 20 year planning horizon Includes long range and short range multimodal strategies that facilitate efficient movement of people and goods Be updated at least every five years Identifies transportation demand over the plan horizon Includes citizen and public official involvement in the plan development process Considers local comprehensive and land use plans Includes a financial plan The prior 2030 Gadsden Etowah LRTP was adopted in January 2005. The City of Gadsden contracted with Jacobs to assist in the development of the 2035 LRTP update, which commenced in April 2009. This effort was undertaken in concert with the Gadsden Etowah Metropolitan Planning Organization (GEMPO), which is the designated MPO for the Gadsden urbanized area. The 2035 LRTP was adopted in August 2010 1.1 Gadsden Etowah MPO Area Description The GEMPO urban planning area includes the cities of Attalla, Hokes Bluff, Gadsden, Glencoe, Southside, Rainbow City, and Reece City, as well as sections of unincorporated Etowah County and a small section in the northwestern portion of unincorporated Calhoun County. The area is depicted in Figure 1 1. Etowah County is situated at the southern tip of the eastern foothills of the Appalachian Mountains. The Coosa River winds through much of the study area and Noccalula Falls graces the northwest corner of Gadsden. Etowah County was once a stronghold of the Cherokee Indians. The City of Gadsden, settled in 1825, is the county seat and largest city in the county. It is named for Colonel James Gadsden, who negotiated the Gadsden Purchase, which annexed territory in what is now the southwestern United States from Mexico. The Gadsden Etowah area is a regional center for much of the retail, industrial, manufacturing, health care, and economic activity in the northeastern section of the state. The area has a welldeveloped arterial highway network that provides convenient access to regional and national markets. Two Interstate highways, four US highways, and several state routes traverse the study area. CSX and Norfolk Southern railways plus numerous truck lines provide freight service. Birmingham International Airport, which is served by most major airlines and several regional carriers, is only 55 miles away, and Gadsden Municipal Airport provides local flight services for private aircraft. The Tennessee River, with a river barge terminal, is within 30 miles. Greyhound Bus Lines provides inter city bus service within the area. The City of Gadsden sponsors a Dial a Ride transit

service (DART) that serves locations within the city and on a limited basis in Attalla and Rainbow City. The City of Gadsden also operates three fixed routes (east, west and central) within some areas of the city using trolley buses. Etowah County sponsors a Rural Area Transportation Service (RATS) for residents in rural Etowah County. The area has a significant industrial and health care industry presence. Mid South Industries (1,500 employees) Goodyear Tire & Rubber (1,400 employees), and Koch Foods (390 employees) have plants in the metropolitan area. People throughout the region utilize the Gadsden Regional Medical Center (1,200 employees) and Riverview Regional Medical Center (650 employees) for primary and advanced diagnostic and medical care. While heavy industry had long been the mainstay of the area s economy, the area s economic base continues to diversify. In step with national trends, the service, retail and light industrial trades are beginning to replace traditional heavy industries as the mainstay of the local economy. 1.2 Metropolitan Planning Organization Structure The City of Gadsden staff performs administrative services of the MPO for the Gadsden Etowah urbanized area. MPO planning and decision making is directed by a policy committee, the MPO Board, which is comprised of 12 voting members. Local representation on the MPO Board includes the mayors from the 7 municipalities, the County Commissioner, the City of Gadsden Directors of Engineering and Planning, the MPO transportation planner, and the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) Division Engineer. The MPO Board is supported and advised by a Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC), a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Advisory Committee (BPGAC) and MPO technical staff. A complete list of MPO Board, TCC and CAC and BPGAC members is shown as Attachment A. 1.3 Planning Factors Signed into law August 10, 2005, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA LU) modified the planning factors developed in the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA 21) to guide metropolitan planning. The revised planning factors are considered in the transportation planning process conducted by the MPO and reflected in the updated 2035 LRTP. These include: Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non motorized users. Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of all motorized and non motorized users. Increase the accessibility and options available to people and for freight. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve quality of life and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight. Promote efficient system management and operation. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system (Public Law 105 178 1203(f), 23 USC 134). Consistency with Other Plans There are general and specific directions under SAFETEA LU (Section 6001) for the consistency requirement. 23 USC 134, Section 6001(a)(g)(3) states The secretary shall encourage each metropolitan planning organization to consult with officials responsible for other types of planning

activities economic development, environmental protection, airport operations, and freight movements.to coordinate its planning process.with such planning activities. Under the metropolitan planning process, transportation plans and TIPs shall be developed with due consideration of other related planning activities The MPO addresses this requirement by including planning, economic development, engineering, and other technical personnel from various levels of government on the Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC). In addition, the MPO consults with agencies and officials responsible for other planning activities within the Study Area that are affected by transportation when developing the long range transportation plan and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). This includes Federal, State and Local agencies responsible for: Economic growth and development Environmental protection Airport operations Freight movement Land use management Natural resources Conservation Historic preservation Human service transportation providers A contact list of these officials and agencies has been developed and is maintained, per the MPO s Public Involvement Plan, found in Appendix A. Incorporating these key individuals in the transportation planning process allows for broad understanding of transportation planning and land use development activities at the local and regional level, which can afford opportunities for cooperation and coordination. 2. Long Range Plan Amendment Process 2.1. Since adoption of the 2035 LRTP there has been a need to include major phases to one of the Capacity projects. The process for implementing the major project phases requires an amendment to the LRTP as defined in 23 CFR 450.104 and the processes set out at 23 CFR 450.322 (c). The proposed amendment concerns the project: Widening SR 77 from I-59 Ramps( West side) to US-11 in Attalla. 2.2 Notices concerning the proposed LRTP amendment were posted in local newspapers and the GEMPO website. Public involvement meetings were conducted in conjunction with meeting s of the following GEMPO Committees: 2.2.1 The Citizens Advisory Committee 2.2.2 The Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Advisory Committee 2.2.3 The Technical Coordinating Committee 3. Updated Listing of Capacity Projects 3.1 The updated listing of the Capacity Projects after the LRTP amendment is shown Attachment B and Map 1.

Gadsden / Etowah Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (GEMPO) Voting Members Johnny Harris Division Engineer, ALDOT Jane Phillips, Vice Chairperson Mayor, City of Attalla Jeff Overstreet, Commissioner Etowah County Sherman Guyton Mayor, City of Gadsden Chad Hare, City Engineer City of Gadsden Nick Hall, City Planner City of Gadsden Meinrad Tabengwa Transportation Planner, City of Gadsden Charles Gilchrist Mayor, City of Glencoe Gary Reeves Mayor, City of Hokes Bluff Terry John Calhoun, Chairman Mayor, City of Rainbow City Randall Scott Mayor, City of Reece City Wally Burns Mayor, City of Southside *Seven (7) voting members required for a quorum Gadsden / Etowah Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (GEMPO) Non Voting Members Robert J. Jilla Bureau Chief Transportation Planning and Modal Systems ALDOT, ex officio member of the MPO James W. (Bill) Curtis Executive Director, East Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission Victor Mendez, Administrator Federal Highway Administration Joe Roberson Mayor, City of Ohatchee John McHugh Mayor, City of Steele

GEMPO Committee Members Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Advisory Committee (BPGAC) Voting Members Roger Silvey, Chairman City of Hokes Bluff Representative Heidi Darbo, Vice-Chairperson City of Gadsden Representative Charles Shaw City of Attalla Representative Eric Rebarchik City of Attalla Representative Archie Battles Etowah County Representative James B. Johnson Etowah County Representative Ed Whatley City of Gadsden Representative Don Richey City of Glencoe Representative *Four (4) voting members required for a quorum Bobby Watson City of Glencoe Representative City of Hokes Bluff Representative Lisa Dobbins City of Rainbow City Representative City of Rainbow City Representative City of Reece City Representative City of Reece City Representative Joe Battles Vice Chairman City of Southside Representative City of Southside Representative Citizen s Advisory Committee (CAC) Voting Member Barry Hill, Chairman City of Glencoe Representative Preston Nix, Vice Chairman City of Attalla Representative Richard Bradfield City of Attalla Representative Carolyn Parker Etowah County Representative Floyd L. Donald Etowah County Representative Tom Barnes City of Gadsden Representative City of Gadsden Representative *Four (4) voting members required for a quorum 3 City of Glencoe Representative Jeff Cheatwood City of Hokes Bluff Representative Myra Whitt City of Hokes Bluff Representative Jon Noojin City of Rainbow City Representative Lloyd Matthews City of Rainbow City Representative City of Reece City Representative (2) City of Southside Representative (2)

Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) Voting Members Meinrad Tabengwa, Chairman Transportation Planner, City of Gadsden Nick Hall Director of Planning, City of Gadsden Terry John Calhoun Chairman, Gadsden / Etowah MPO Chad Hare City Engineer, City of Gadsden Tim Graves Engineer, Etowah County Les Hopson Pre Construction Engineer, ALDOT Ben Thackerson District Engineer, ALDOT Clint Andrews Community Planner, FHWA *Five (5) voting members required for a quorum Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) Non Voting Members Emmanuel Oranika, PhD Metropolitan Transportation Planning Administrator Rebecca Crane Jones, Blair, Waldrup & Tucker, Inc. Houston Jenkins, Jr. Jones, Blair, Waldrup & Tucker, Inc. Joe P. Bearrentine Bearrentine Environmental Services Jeff Gray GIS Analyst, City of Gadsden Doug Peterson Volkert & Associates Joe Meads Sain Associates Mike McCain Gadsden / Etowah Industrial Development Authority Bennett Tucker Gadsden / Etowah Chamber of Commerce Transportation Committee 4

ATTACHMENT B Project ID # ALDOT Project ID Project Limits 1 100004851 SR 77 from CR 162(Steele Station Rd) to I 59 ramps (east side) Attalla. Includes replacing BIN 002037 US 278 from CR 65 to approximately 0.15 miles east of 2 100004331 Piney Woods Rd 100004644, 3 100004646, SR 77 add lanes from Green Valley Rd to Sunset Dr 100008733, US 411, new location 4 lane from Gadsden to 4 100008736, Turkeytown 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Time Range Short (1 5 yrs) 1.42 (25+ yrs) 3.761 Short (1 5 yrs) 2 Short (1 5 yrs) 7.39 100008734, 100008735 US 411, new location from Turkeytown to Cherokee CR 20 Short (1 5 yrs) 5.3 100008479, CR 162 (Steele Station Rd) from SR 77 to CR 203 (Sutton Short (1 5 100008480 Bridge Rd) yrs) 1.09 100008476, Extend Black Creek Pkwy south to Steele Station Rd (4 Short (1 5 100053845 lane) yrs) 3.36 100032781, Relocation of SR 291 from George Wallace Dr to US 431 100003958, (4 lanes) (25+ yrs) 1.06 100004854, 100004856 SR 77 from US 11 to US 431 (25+ yrs) 3.212 100046965, Replace bridge on CR 203 (South 11TH St) at Black 100046964 Creek, BIN #002249 100054836 100004858 SR 77 from I 59 ramp (west side) to SR 7 (US 11) in 100049111 Attalla (25+ yrs) 100004852 2035 Gadsden Etowah MPO Needs Plan Amendment #1 CAPACITY PROJECTS Length (miles) Project Type Purpose Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement (25+ yrs) 0 Bridge Widening 2 to reduce congestion and 4 lanes improve Widening 2 to reduce congestion and 4 lanes improve Widening 2 to reduce congestion and 4 lanes improve New Roadway reduce congestion and 4 lanes improve New Roadway reduce congestion and 4 lanes improve Widening 2 to reduce congestion and 4 lanes improve Widening 2 to reduce congestion and 4 lanes enhance connectivity Roadway reduce congestion and Relocation 4 improve Widening 2 to reduce congestion and 4 lanes improve 1.8 Widening 2 to 4 lanes Total Cost (YOE) Defined During Design Phase 11,300,000 Defined During Design Phase 12,900,000 Defined During Design Phase 17,800,000 Already in construction Pedestrian need along this corridor is to be assessed through Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan 21,600,000 Defined During Design Phase 33,200,000 Already in ROW acquisition Pedestrian need along this corridor is to be assessed through Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan 3,200,000 Already in construction Pedestrian need along this corridor is to be assessed through Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan 10,200,000 Defined During Design Phase 12,300,000 Defined During Design Phase 43,800,000 replace a structurally deficient bridge Project includes 7 8' sidewalks/multi use path 535,000 reduce congestion and improve access to the interstate Widening 2 to reduce congestion and 12 N/A Widen US 411 from Whorton Bend Rd to SR 77 (25+ yrs) 2.8 4 lanes improve SR 25 (US 411) from 0.1 mile north of CR 181 (Township Widening 2 to reduce congestion and 13 100049235 Rd) to SR 77 in Rainbow City (25+ yrs) 1.5 4 lanes improve 100008487, Extend College Pkwy from Padenrich to George Wallace Turn Lanes, reduce congestion and 14 100008491 Dr (25+ yrs) 1.38 Intersections enhance connectivity 100038811, provide an alternate to 15 100038912 Extension of I 759 east to US 278 (25+ yrs) 2.2 New Roadway congested local road and to enhance connectivity provide an alternate to 16 N/A Extension of I 759 west to US 278/US 431 (25+ yrs) 2 New Roadway congested local road and to enhance connectivity Project is in design phase. Sidewalks are being considered. 15,100,000 Included as Defined During Design Phase 26,100,000 Included as Defined During Design Phase 19,000,000 Included as Defined During Design Phase 2,700,000 Sidewalk (5' wide) on north side, 10' shared use path on south side, shared use bridge over CSX RR and Stillman Ave 97,300,000 Legal Exception Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities not allowed on interstates 107,269,000 Total Capacity = 434,304,000 Note: Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan to be conducted by GEMPO within a year or two of finalized LRTP. Specific bicycle and pedestrian projects will be defined by this plan.

Amendment # 1 MAP 1 Gadsden-Etowah - 2035 LRTP Update 2035 LRTP Update Figure Needs Plan S ii tt yy V ES-1: S aa rr d d ii ss C C 2035 B Bo o aa zz U Roadway Projects B Bo o aa zz 205 M Mo ou un n tt aa ii n nb bo o rr o o Project ID # Amended Capacity project U V 227 1 2 3 ETOWAH COUNTY 4 5 59 7 411 R R ee ee cc ee C C ii tt yy 168 U V Ridgeville 5 6 11 8 4 9 Ridgeville 10 ** 59 9 11 16 G G aa d d ss d d ee n n 10 A A tt tt aa ll l10 l aa + 7 1 6 59 759 12, 48 411 13 + 21 August 2010 12 74 50 15 H Ho o kk ee ss B B ll u u ff ff 14 14 2 15 16 49 O Oh h aa tt cc h h ee ee Length Project Limits (miles) Project Type SR 77 from Steele Lake Weiss Station Rd to I-59 Widening -2 ramps (east) Attalla 1.42 to 4 lanes US 278 from CR 65 to approx 0.15 miles east Widening - 2 of Piney Woods Rd 3.76 to 4 lanes SR 77 add lanes from Green Valley Rd to Widening - 2 Sunset Dr 2.00 to 4 lanes US 411, new location 4lane from Gadsden to New Roadway Turkeytown 7.39-4-lanes US 411, new location from Turkeytown to New Roadway Cherokee CR 20 5.30-4 lanes CR 162 (Steele Station Rd) from SR 77 to CR Widening - 2 203 (Sutton Bridge Rd) 1.09 to 4 lanes Extend Black Creek Pkwy south to Steele Widening - 2 Station Rd (4-lane) 3.36 to 4 lanes Relocation of SR 291 Roadway from George Wallace Relocation - 4 Dr to US 431 (4 lanes) 1.06 lanes SR 77 from US 11 to US 431 Replace bridge on CR 203 (South 11TH St) at Black Creek, BIN SR 77 from I-59 ramp (west side) to SR 7 (US 11) in Attalla Widen US 411 from Whorton Bend Rd to SR 77 US 411 from 0.1 mile north of CR 181 (Township Rd) to SR 77 Extend College Pkwy from Padenrich to George Wallace Dr 3.21 0.00 1.80 2.80 1.50 1.38 Extension of I-759 east to US 278 2.20 Extension of I-759 west to US 278/US 431 2.00 Project Limits Length (miles) Purpose C ee n n tt rr ee C reduce congestion and enhance connectivity Widening - 2 to 4 lanes replace a structurally deficient Bridge bridge Widening - 2 to 4 lanes interstate access Widening - 2 to 4 lanes Widening - 2 to 4 lanes Turn Lanes, Intersection reduce congestion and enhance Improvements connectivity provide an alternate to congested New Roadway local roads provide an alternate to congested New Roadway local roads Regional Inset Project ID # 431 21 Blue circles indicate projects are included in the Financially Constrained Plan. All other Projects are only in Needs Plan and, therefore, no funding has been identified to implement these projects. Project Type Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement Replace Bridge on SR 77 (NB) over Coosa River (BIN 002035) 50 59 SR 211 from Lookout Circle to US 278 1.5 Intersections/ improve the safety and Sight Distance operationsof this corridor 0 0.5 1 a Mississippi a 2 3 c c Project is in design phase. Sidewalks are being considered. Included as Included as Included as Sidewalk (5' wide) on north side, 10' shared use path on south side, shared use bridge over CSX RR and Stillman Ave Legal Exception - Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities not allowed on interstates Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities will be included in bridge design Cost Exception: Improvements would exceed 20% of total budget P P ii ee d dm mo on n tt Cost Exception: Improvements would exceed 20% of total budget P P ii ee d dm mo on n tt Cost Exception: Improvements would exceed 20% of total budget Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities will be included in improved intersection design 4 E 5 Miles Florida Legend Project includes 7-8' sidewalks/multi-use path Alabama d Already in ROW acquisition - Pedestrian need along this corridor is to be assessed through Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan Already in construction - Pedestrian need along this corridor is to be assessed through Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan Georgia ( f & % Already in construction - Pedestrian need along this corridor is to be assessed through Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan Note: Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Plan to be developed by GEMPO within a year or two of finalized LRTP. Specific bicycle and pedestrian projects will be identified by this plan **- Amended for inclusion in Financially Constrained Plan b c Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement replace a structurally deficient 0.6 Bridge bridge/reduce congestion Access The purpose of this plan is to US 411 from Whorton Management improve operations and reduce Bend Rd to Lumley Rd 3.9 Plan congestion Access The purpose of this plan is to US 431 from Green Management improve operations and reduce Valley Rd through US 11 11.75 Plan congestion Access The purpose of this plan is to US 278 from US 431 to Management improve operations and reduce Alford Bend Rd 6.1 Plan congestion 49 ( g & % CHEROKEE COUNTY Purpose N.C. Tennessee Major Maintenance and Operation Projects G G ll ee n n cc o o ee 48 77 U V ST.CLAIR COUNTY 11 13 U V 8 R R aa ii n nb bo ow w C C ii tt yy S So ou u tt h h3ss ii d d ee Capacity Projects L L ee ee ss b bu u rr g g Committed Projects Committed Capacity Projects Needs Plan + Bridge Capacity Projects Access Management Projects Roadway Capacity Projects Turn Lanes, Intersection Improvements Road Network Interstate U.S. Route / State Route Other Roads Other Layers Railroad Gadsden Municipal Airport County Boundaries City Limits (2000 Census) Gadsden-Etowah MPO Boundary Water Bodies Source: U.S. Census (2005), ESRI, & Jacobs This map is intended for planning purposes only. ES - 7 Amended April 2012

Gadsden-Etowah MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Amendment # 1 Comment Form Please take a moment to provide us your thoughts and ideas on transportation for this amendment of Gadsden- Etowah 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. A map is provided on the back of this form for your use. We want and need your input. Thank you. 1. Does the amendment to this project adequately address the transportation needs identified? 2. Are there other transportation needs that you are aware of that need to be addressed? 3. Do you have any other comments regarding the status of the Long Range Transportation Plan or related needs in this area? Name: Mailing Address: (Optional- For mailing list only) Please mail comments to: GEMPO, 1699 Chestnut Street, Gadsden AL 35901; FAX 256-549-4864 Email: mtabengwa@cityofgadsden.com The deadline for the submission of comments is May 30, 2012.