Safety Analysis: Event Classification

Similar documents
Review and Assessment of Engineering Factors

Considerations for the Practical Application of the Safety Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Design

Safety Classification of Structures, Systems and Components in Nuclear Power Plants

Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

SAFETY APPROACHES. The practical elimination approach of accident situations for water-cooled nuclear power reactors

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment

How to reinforce the defence-indepth in NPP by taking into account natural hazards?

The «practical elimination» approach for pressurized water reactors

DESIGN OF REACTOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

CONTENTS OF THE PCSR CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION

DESIGN OF REACTOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

IAEA Headquarters in Vienna, Austria 6 to 9 June 2017 Ref No.: CN-251. Ivica Bašić, Ivan Vrbanić APoSS d.o.o.

Nuclear Safety Regulation: Before and after Fukushima*

RISKAUDIT GRS - IRSN Safety assessment of the BELENE NPP

Severe Accident Management Programmes for Nuclear Power Plants

Assessment of Internal Hazards

Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

DISTRIBUTION LIST. Preliminary Safety Report Chapter 19 Internal Hazards UK HPR1000 GDA. GNS Executive. GNS all staff. GNS and BRB all staff CGN EDF

IEM on Severe Accident Management in the light of the accident at the Fukushima Daïchi NPP

REGULATORY OBSERVATION

IAEA Regional Workshop Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Decommissioning of Research Reactors June Manila, Philippines

Safety and efficiency go hand in hand at MVM Paks NPP

Loss of Normal Feedwater Analysis by RELAP5/MOD3.3 in Support to Human Reliability Analysis

ASSESSMENT SAFETY. PRlNtlPLES FOR NUCLEAR PLANTS HSE. This version of the SAPs has been super eded by the 2014 version. Please see

Assessing Combinations of Hazards in a Probabilistic Safety Analysis

Evaluation and Demonstration of Safety of Decommissioning of

Enhancing NPP Safety through an Effective Dependability Management

10. SYSTEM ANALYSIS. The assessment consist of two elements: Safety Analysis Report and an independent Review of Safety Report.

Regulatory Review of Safety Assessment for Decommissioning of Facilities Using Radioactive Material

Recent Research on Hazards PSA

Safety of Decommissioning: International Cooperation under the IAEA Coordination

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE DG-1074

Probabilistic safety assessment of fire hazards

The Nitrogen Threat. The simple answer to a serious problem. 1. Why nitrogen is a risky threat to our reactors? 2. Current strategies to deal with it.

Safety Requirement Specification

Complementarity between Safety and Physical Protection in the Protection against Acts of Sabotage of Nuclear Facilities

Regional Workshop on the International Basic Safety Standards. Session 1: Dose Limits and Dose Constraints

Regulatory requirements with respect to Spent Fuel Pool Cooling

STEP 3 INTERNAL HAZARDS ASSESSMENT OF THE EDF and AREVA UK EPR DIVISION 6 ASSESSMENT REPORT NO. AR 09/026-P

IAEA-TECDOC Precursor analyses The use of deterministic and PSA based methods in the event investigation process at nuclear power plants

MDEP Common Position No AP

Nuclear Safety. Module 3 DEFENSE IN DEPTH. Reacu03.ppt. Slide!

IAEA Training in Level 2 PSA MODULE 8: Coupling Source Terms to Probabilistic Event Analysis (CET end-state binning)

Verification and validation of computer codes Exercise

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS SERIES

Nuclear safety Lecture 4. The accident of the TMI-2 (1979)

NUBIKI Nuclear Safety Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary

Safety Standards for Decommissioning Activities

Ing. JOZEF BALÁŽ Ph.D. and Ing MILAN CVAN CSc

Use of Computational Fluid Dynamic Fire Models to Evaluate Operator Habitability for Manual Actions in Fire Compartments

ONR GUIDE. Internal Hazards. Nuclear Safety Technical Assessment Guide. NS-TAST-GD-014 Revision 4

Integration of safety studies into a detailed design phase for a navy ship

Preliminary Failure Mode and Effect Analysis for CH HCSB TBM

Effects of Delayed RCP Trip during SBLOCA in PWR

What should a radiation regulator do about NORM?

Dynamic Context Quantification for Design Basis Accidents List Extension and Timely Severe Accident Management

Purpose. Scope. Process flow OPERATING PROCEDURE 07: HAZARD LOG MANAGEMENT

RISK-INFORMED OPTIMIZATION OF SURVEILLANCE TEST INTERVALS. Sami Sirén 1, Kalle Jänkälä 2

ONR GUIDE. External Hazards. Nuclear Safety Technical Assessment Guide. NS-TAST-GD-013 Revision 6

Inspection Credit for PWSCC Mitigation via Peening Surface Stress Improvement

PI MODERN RELIABILITY TECHNIQUES OBJECTIVES. 5.1 Describe each of the following reliability assessment techniques by:

Ranking of safety issues for

Definition of Safety Integrity Levels and the Influence of Assumptions, Methods and Principles Used

FUNDAMENTAL SAFETY OVERVIEW VOLUME 2: DESIGN AND SAFETY CHAPTER P: REFERENCE OPERATING CONDITION STUDIES (PCC)

SHUTDOWN SYSTEMS: SDS1 AND SDS2

THE CANDU 9 DISTRffiUTED CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN PROCESS

Safety Standards. of the Nuclear Safety Standards Commission (KTA)

HTR Systems and Components

Pressure Equipment Directive PED 2014/68/EU Commission's Working Group "Pressure"

Justification of Risk Reduction through In-Service Inspection / REDUCE

Every things under control High-Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS)

HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE HM NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS INSPECTORATE

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT OF COLD CHANNEL PIPELINE RUPTURE SIZE FOR WWER 440/270 REACTOR

Questions & Answers About the Operate within Operate within IROLs Standard

Radiation Protection of the Emergency Workers Regaining Control over Radioactive Material Inside Destroyed Unit IV of the Chernobyl NPP

Software Safety Hazard Analysis

SAFETY REGULATORS' ADVICE ON THE SELECTION OF THE PROPULSION PLANT IN SUPPORT OF THE FUTURE DETERRENT REVIEW NOTE Issue 1.

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

A study on the relation between safety analysis process and system engineering process of train control system

Skin dose assessments for contaminated individuals using VARSKIN. Izzy Styles Sellafield Ltd

Regional Workshop on the International Basic Safety Standards. Session 10: Emergency Preparedness and Response

PROCEDURE. April 20, TOP dated 11/1/88

Engineering & Projects Organization

Planned reference and intervention levels in Finland

System Operating Limit Definition and Exceedance Clarification

Improving Accuracy of Frequency Estimation of Major Vapor Cloud Explosions for Evaluating Control Room Location through Quantitative Risk Assessment

Justification and use of hand-held X-ray equipment

Safety-Critical Systems

FUNDAMENTAL SAFETY OVERVIEW VOLUME 2: DESIGN AND SAFETY CHAPTER F: CONTAINMENT AND SAFEGUARD SYSTEMS 7. CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM (EVU [CHRS])

What are the benefits of the best practice: New PAAA Enforcement Coordinators will have a better understanding of the associated CFR.

TEPCO s Safety Assurance Philosophy on Nuclear Power Generation Plants

Systems of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material

NKS PODRIS project. Importance of inspection reliability assumptions on piping failure probability estimates

Overview of the ATC activities in the last twenty years 2014 ISOE Asian ALARA Symposium

Aeronautical studies and Safety Assessment

Nordic tsunamis, defence-indepth strengths and deficiencies

The Regulatory Framework Improvement for Safe Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants in Korea

CNS In-Pool Assembly Mechanical Design for OYSTER Project

in84061.txt at Page 1 of 6 2/25/00

Transcription:

IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Safety Analysis: Event Classification Lecturer Lesson IV 1_2 Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country XX - XX Month, Year

Nuclear industry has adopted the defence-indepth approach, in order to maintain the effectiveness of physical barriers between radiation sources and radioactive materials and workers, members of public and environment, in operational states and, for some barriers, in accident conditions. There are several lines of defence. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 2

DESIGN BASIS : the range of conditions and events taken explicitly into account in the design of a plant, so that the plant can withstand them w/o exceeding authorised limits, by the planned operation or safety systems. DETERMINISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT: aims to determine the effectiveness of lines of defence. DSA establish and confirm the DB for items important to safety, ensuring that the plant design meets safety and radiological criteria (integrity of barriers). IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 3

The basis of DSA is establishing a set of so called design basis events (DBEs) and analysing their consequences by means of calculational methodologies (that include computer codes). A DBE is described by: Specified failure (or set of failures) Conservative initial conditions All the control and safety systems operated as designed IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 4

IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 5

The DBEs are classified in CATEGORIES, roughly depending on their expected occurrence frequency and potential consequences. In such categories are included Anticipated Operational Occurrences (AOOs), and Design Basis Accidents (DBAs). For each category, the DSA checks that the design meets the ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA, that normally reflect the criteria used by designers or operators and are consistent with the requirements of the regulatory body. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 6

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA: ensure that an adequate level of defence in depth is maintained by preventing damage to barriers and unacceptable radiological releases. Two levels: Global/high level criteria related to doses to the public or prevention of consequential pressure boundary failure. Often defined in law or by the regulatory body. Detailed criteria defined by designer or analyst. Sufficient, but not necessary to meet the global ones. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 7

DSA: Acceptance Criteria More stringent criteria often applied for events with a higher frequency of occurrence. Detailed acceptance criteria could include: An event should not generate a subsequent more serious plant condition w/o the occurrence of a further independent failure. No consequential loss of function of the safety systems needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident. Systems for accident mitigation: designed to withstand loads, stresses and environmental conditions for the accidents. Pressure in primary and secondary systems should non exceed design limits. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 8

DSA: Acceptance Criteria Allowed number of fuel cladding failures: established for each type of PIE to meet the global radiological criteria. LOCA criteria. Containment criteria. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 9

Postulated Initiating Events (PIEs) : starting point for the DSA. They are identified events that to AOOs or accident conditions, including equipment failure, human errors and external events (natural or human-induced). The set of PIEs includes events of very low frequency or consequences, at least at the beginning of the process. Some of them can be eliminated subsequently. PIEs classified in terms of frequency of occurrence. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 10

AOOs: operational processes deviating from normal operation that have the potential to challenge the safety of the reactor. According to design provisions, AOOs do not cause any significant damage to items important to safety, nor lead to accident conditions. AOOs are expected to occur at least once during the operating lifetime of the plant (frequency of occurrence higher than 0.01 per reactor and year). IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 11

DBAs : accident conditions against which a nuclear plant is designed, and for which the damage to the fuel and the release of radioactive material are kept within authorized limits. DBAs are not expected to occur during the lifetime of the plant (frequency 10-2 to 10-5 per reactor and year, but some like LBLOCA are even less frequent). PIEs identified as initiators of AOOs are also potential initiators of DBAs. PIEs leading to DBAs have the same categories than for AOOs. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 12

Once identified, PIEs are grouped, and for each group a bounding case is chosen for analysis (in general, one for each safety parameter), looking for the most severe challenges to the main safety functions. DBAs are basis for the design of the reactivity control systems, RCS, ESF, electric power systems and various auxiliary systems important to safety. Modifications of plants: the assessment is focused on affected DB events. The methodology may need some change: new acceptance criteria, new tools, etc. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 13

DSA states if a reactor design is adequate and licensable. DSA is a tool in developing plan protection and control systems setpoints and control parameters, and the Technical Specifications of the plant. Why deterministic? : Traditionally: No probabilities in the calculation (in principle) Results are single numerical values with probability 1 But this is not true for best-estimate analyses!!! IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 14

DSA versus PSA (Probabilistic Safety Analysis): Both approaches are necessary, because they are complementary. When the insights from both approaches are not consistent, further specific studies are needed. DSA can be: Conservative (worst-case, pessimistic), traditional approach. Best-estimate or realistic, newer approach, it includes an uncertainty quantification of the results. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 15

DSA carried out by: Designer: as part of the design and construction process Operating organization, to confirm the design DSA must be parallel to the design process, with iteration between them. The final SA must reflect the final plant design. DSA is used for evaluating design changes, supporting decision-making processes, revealing new issues, etc. Also: Periodic SA of an operating plant Safety justification of a design modification IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 16

DSA demonstrates the effectiveness of the equipment incorporated to prevent escalation of AOOs and DBAs to severe accidents and to mitigate their effects. DSA demonstrates that the safety systems can: Shutdown the reactor and maintain it in safe shutdown condition during and after DBA. Remove residual heat from the core after reactor shutdown from all operational states and DBA conditions. Ensure that radioactive releases during DBA are below acceptable limits. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 17

DSA for normal operation of the plant: Ensures that normal operation is safe, with radiological doses and releases of radioactive materials within acceptable limits (also checking if they are ALARA), and with plant parameters not exceeding operating limits. Should establish the conditions and limitations for safe operation, including: Safety limits for reactor protection and control and other engineered safety systems. Operational limits and reference settings for the control system. Procedural constraints for operational control of processes. Identification of allowable operating configurations. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to assist Decision Making 18