SALMA AHMED AND NOOR JAHAN SARKER Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

Similar documents
Business management in equine businesses

Regulatory Control of Deer in Australia

PASTURES FOR HORSES: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

History of deer in Richmond Park

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Feeding the Broodmare

Growth performance evaluation of genetically improved silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus Bleeker) in different agro-ecological zones in Bangladesh

EBVS are LESSONS FROM THE ASBP / 2. EBVs of Bulls Entered in the ASBP have provided a reliable Prediction of the Performance of their Progeny

Key themes: To be able to identify and name different types of deer. To understand the lifecycle of a deer

Effect of Different Feeds on the Reproductive Performance of Clarias Batrachus (1758)

ALFALFA HAY FOR HORSES

Have you ever wondered how much a Bison weighs?

Consumer Preferences, Ecolabels, and Effects of Negative Environmental Information By Xianwen Chen, Frode Alfnes and Kyrre Rickertsen

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

Ecology and Environmental Impact of Javan Rusa Deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in the Royal National Park

Influence of Hay Ring Presence on Waste in Horses Fed Hay 1

SCIENTIFIC ADVISER. In support of shooting on Welsh public land

GLOBAL RE-INTRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES

138 Trop Anim Prod :2

TOWARDS ECOSYSTEM BASED MANAGEMENT OF FISHERIES: WHAT ROLE CAN ECONOMICS (AQUACULTURE) PLAY? PRESENTER: MR. ALAGIE SILLAH THE GAMBIA

Atsuko YAMAGUCHI. Since the catches of these fish decrease as the waters, including those around western Kyushu and

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

Parasites of Ungulates in the Jackson Hole Area: Scarabaeoid Beetles Acting on Lungworm, Dictyocaulus hadweni, Larvae in Elk Feces 1980

Effect of Altitude and Season on Rectal Temperature, Pulse Rate and Respiration Rate in Mithun (Bos frontalis)

Development and Management of Bulls 1

CHEETAH & RHINO ACTIVITIES PRIMARY

Monitoring of sea trout post-smolts, 2012

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

ON AN EXPERIMENT IN PRAWN-CUM-TILAPIA CULTURE IN PADDY FIELD K. RAMAN 1. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin

Sustaining Wild Species

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

Grazing Strategies for Horse Owners

SOCIAL AND REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOUR OF CRITICALLY ENDANGERED NORTHERN WHITE RHINOCEROS (CERATOTHERIUM COTTONI) IN A ZOOLOGICAL GARDEN

Effects of Creep Feeding on Preweaning and Postweaning Performance Of Angus x Hereford Calves

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

ACTIVITY PATTERN OF BLUE BULL (BOSELAPHUS TRAGOCAMELUS) IN CAPTIVITY AT ZOOLOGICAL GARDEN, KOLKATA, INDIA

The Life History of Triturus v. vittatus (Urodela) in Various Habitats

Amur Leopard - Diet. Learn more online conservewildcats.org

Randy Fulk and Jodi Wiley North Carolina Zoo

Caligus elongatus as parasites

STORM FORECASTS: The only independent source of animal health and animal agriculture historical market data and forecasts

United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Inspection Report. Customer ID:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENGINEERING RESEARCH, DINDIGUL Volume 2, No 2, 2011

An association of elk and deer owners committed to the development of their herds and the cervid industry in the state.

2018 Calf Challenge Record Book

NATIONAL: SUPPORT FOR CIRCUS ANIMAL BAN

Traits of the breed Double muscle factor

Record of a Sixteen-year-old White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Carbondale, Illinois: a Brief Note.

LAKE ONTARIO FISHING AND FISH CONSUMPTION

PROVINCIAL AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LAO PDR SUPPORT FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES. Guidelines for Broodstock and Hatchery Management

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOME INDICES AND BODY COEFFICIENTS OF SILURUS GLANIS AND CYPRINUS CARPIO IN DIFFERENT STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT

Inshore wrasse pot fishery What are the issues?

ish_ Energetics New Pers:Rectives

J. R. McGillis THE KIDNEY FAT INDEX AS AN INDICATOR OF CONDITION IN VARIOUS AGE AND SEX CLASSES OF MOOSE. Canadian Wildlife Service

Growth and production performance of red tilapia and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Lin.) under low-input culture system

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Rural Ontario s Hidden Sector: The Economic Importance of the Horse Industry Final Report

48 7 ( ; $ 6 :, / ' /, ) (

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

Effect of Maternal Dietary Yeast Supplementation. during Late Gestation and Early Lactation on Foal Growth. and Development from Birth to Weaning

Ecology and Utilisation of Harpagophytum procumbens (Devil's Claw) in Southern Africa

PERSIAN FALLOW DEER GRANT PROPOSAL

Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)

Breaking The Brand. Conservation - A New Approach. International Zoo News Vol. 62. No. 3 (2015), pp

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

APPLICATION FOR CITES REGISTRATION OF A CAPTIVE BREEDING OPERATION

Conservation and the Use of Wildlife Resources

Hair Shedding Scores Relating to Maternal Traits and Productivity in Beef Cattle. An Undergraduate Honors Thesis in the. Animal Science Department

Animal of the Month. Moose January 2013

Basic Physical Needs of Horses

Activity profiles in adolescent netball: A combination of global positioning system technology and time-motion analysis

Lead in ammunition. Torbjörn Lindskog President, AFEMS Member of Board, Norma Precision AB Öster Malma,

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com. International Advanced Level Biology Advanced Subsidiary Unit 3: Practical Biology and Research Skills

Journal of Applied and Natural Science 6 (1): (2014)

Overview Life history Distribution Management

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

TEXAS LONGHORN WAGON TOURS & SAFARIS, LEAHTON PARK

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNITED STATES CERVID FARMING INDUSTRY

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

4-H Bucket Calf Project

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Level and Advanced Level

Predation risk theory for optimising control of wild deer. A.D.M. Latham, M.C. Latham & D. Herries

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status

KANSAS 4 -H BUCKET CALF PROJECT

Correlations between Animal Activity and Zoo Visitor Attention. Focusing on Western Lowland Gorillas. Antoinette Rivera. Cleveland Metroparks Zoo

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Introducing Friend of the Sea. Certification of seafood products from sustainable fisheries and aquaculture

DanBred Breeding objectives and results

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

ESRM 350 Consumptive and Non- Consumptive Exploitation of Wildlife

Deer Harvest Characteristics During Compound and Traditional Archery Hunts

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

CHALLENGES OF MARKETING NON-NATIVE DEER AND VENISON PRODUCTS. Dr. Greg Clary 1

4350, Australia. Australia.

ESRM 350 Consumptive and Non- Consumptive Exploitation of Wildlife

Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2010

Killingly Public Schools

Equiculture Publishing. Chapter 1: Introduction

Transcription:

Bangladesh J. Zool. 34(1): 127-131, 2006 FOOD CONSUMPTION OF BARKING DEER (MUNTIACUS MUNTJAK ZIMMERMANN) IN CAPTIVITY SALMA AHMED AND NOOR JAHAN SARKER Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Abstract: The daily food consumption of a barking deer, Muntiacus muntjak, in captivity was 6.48 kg. per day. The consumption was the highest in winter (6.60 kg/day) followed by summer (6.50 kg/day) and monsoon (6.35 kg/day). It was observed that this species preferred grasses followed by granular food and then vegetables. The individuals were found to take their food in the morning and evening more eagerly than the rest of the time. The male was more active than the female during feeding and they did not quarrel with each other. After feeding they took rest under a shaded place within the enclosure. Key words: Barking deer, food, consumption, captivity INTRODUCTION Sarker and Khan (1991a,b) worked on the breeding of barking deer and spotted deer in captivity. Awal et al. (1992) worked on the breeding of sambar deer in captivity. Mattiello et al. (1997) reported the feeding and social behavior of the fallow deer under intensive pasture confinement. The present study was aimed to collect as much information as possible on the food consumption of barking deer (Muntiacus muntjak) in captivity. Deer farming is a very successful aspect in the world. There are many deer farms in Australia, New Zealand, England and Scotland, which are well established and highly contributing to the economy as well as to deer conservation. The purpose of the present study is to assess the food requirements of the barking deer, M. muntijak. It is expected that this finding will help the interested persons who intend to make attempt for establishing deer farms in our country. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was undertaken in the Dhaka Zoo, Mirpur, Bangladesh, with the permission of the respective authority from November 1998 to October 1999. The food consumption of M. muntjak was observed in three days per month. The observations were made early in the morning and in the afternoon. There were 16 barking deers including five males, seven females and four subadults. The average body weight of the barking deers was 24 kg. The consumption of all foods by each barking deer was assessed by averaging the consumed food by 16 deer in the enclosure no. L24. The grill height was 10 ft,

128 Ahmed and Sarker the length of the cage was 115 ft and breadth 48 ft. There was also a water tank and some shaded places. The food items were grasses (Cynodon sp., Cyperus sp., Altenanthero sessilis) granular food (the bran of Triticum aestivum, Lathyrus, sativus, Sesamum iindicum) and vegetables (Solanum sp., Benincase cerifera, Lagenaria vulgaris, Cucumis sativus, Carica papaya, Cucurbita maxima, Saucus carota, Brassica campestris, Colocasia eaculenta, Raphanas, sativa, Apinacea oleracea). In addition to the granular food 15 g of iodine salt was supplied for each deer. The supply of food items depended on their availability in a season. All observations were made during day time as the barking deers are diurnal animals. Food was supplied always in the morning from 9.00 a.m. to 10.30 a.m. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The total amount of food consumed, i.e. grasses, granular food and vegetables together was 6.48 kg/day. The consumption of grasses by a barking deer was from 4.58 to 5.08 kg/day (Avg. 4.78 kg/day). The consumption of the granular food by a barking deer was from 0.96 to 1.31 kg/day (Avg. 1.17 kg/day). The consumption of the vegetables by a barking deer was from 0.44 to 0.63 kg/day (Avg. 0.53 kg/day). The consumption of the grasses by a barking deer was from 4.58 to 4.65 kg/day (Avg. 5.00 kg/day) in winter season, from 4.6 to 4.9 kg/day (avg. 4.75 kg/day) in summer and 5.00 to 5.08 kg/day (avg. 4.6 kg/day) in monsoon (Fig. 1). So, the consumption was the highest in winter season followed by summer and monsoon. The consumption of the granular food by a barking deer was 0.56 to 0.63 kg/day (avg. 1.00 kg/day) in winter season, 0.44 to 0.56 kg/day (Avg. 1.25 kg/day) in summer season and 0.44 to 0.58 kg/day (Avg 1.25 kg/day) in monsoon. So, the granular food consumption was the highest in summer and monsoon, and the lowest in winter. The consumption of the vegetables by a barking deer was from 0.56 to 0.63 kg/day (Avg. 0.60 kg/day) in winter, from 0.44 to 0.56 kg/day (Avg. 0.50 kg/day) in summer and from 0.44 to 0.58 kg/day (Avg. 0.50 kg/day) in monsoon. So, the vegetables was the highest in winter and the lowest in summer and monsoon. It was observed that the barking deer consumed slightly more food in winter than in other seasons. Statistically, however, there was no significance in food intake in different seasons.

Food consumption of barking deer 129 The deer did not feel disturbed during the time of food supply. The food was supplied once a day. The males were more active than the females during feeding. It was noted that the males ate more granular food than the females, and the females ate more vegetables than the males. They finished their feeding within one to two hours. It was also noted that the feeding activity of the males was higher in the morning and evening but in the case of the females the feeding activity was higher in the evening than in the morning. After feeding they drunk water from the water tank and took rest under the shady place within the enclosure. Table 1. Grass, granular foods and vegetables consumed by a barking deer (Muntiacus muntjak) in different seasons in captivity. Name of the food Food consumption (kg/day) Winter Summer Monsoon Grass 5.00 4.75 4.60 Granular food 1.00 1.25 1.25 Vegetables 0.60 0.50 0.50 Vidyadarun et al. (1993) noted that deer consumed a wide variety of grasses, leaves and shrubs. Prater (1980) described that the barking deer ate grasses, leaves and various kinds of wild fruit. The total average food consumption by a barking deer was 6.48 kg/day, Mattiello et al. (1997) noted that deer needed a daily feed supplement consisting of hay (2.7 kg/deer) and the meal consisted to 50% corn and 50% bran (1 kg/deer) in addition to grasses in an enclosure, where total amount was not reported. In the present study, it was observed that the barking deer consumed a larger amount of food in winter than in the other seasons of the year. Adamic (1989) noted that food selection was primarily conditioned by the environmental situation. Adam et al. (1992) noted that, in red deer the voluntary food intake increased during winter. During feeding barking deer group size was large. Schall et al. (1991) noted that fallow bucks occasionally join groups of females in open areas used for feeding. Mattiello et al. (1997) noted that in the feeding station, the highest number of groups was observed. They also noted that the highest percentage of groups was observed in the morning when supplementary feed was delivered. In captivity, the male were more active than the females in the feeding period. The male ate more hay than the females. Mattielo (1997) observed that the adult

130 Ahmed and Sarker females ate more pasture than the adult males. Reinken (1990) noted that females were found in a place where pasture is more abundant. Fig. 1. Seasonal variation in the food consumption of a barking deer, Muntiacus muntjak in captivity. In the present study the deer did never feel disturbed when the visitors came close to the enclosure. Humphries et al. (1989) observed that fallow deer seemed to adapt very well to the presence of humans. In the present study each barking deer took 15 g of iodine salt per day. Vidyadaran et al. (1993) noted that most of the farms provided concentrated salt licks as feed supplements. There was always sufficient water available in each enclosure. Care should be taken that there is always sufficient water available, water shortage decreases the digestibility of food; especially of cellulose and deer will lose weight. (Anton de Vos 1982). LITERATURE CITED ADAMIC, M. 1989 The nutritional characteristics as the element of conservation, breeding and hunting planning of the ungulate game with the emphasis on the red deer. Gozdarski-glasnik (Yugoslavia) 47(4): 145-162. ADAM, C.L., KYLE, C.E. and YOUNG, P. 1992. Growth and reproductive development of the red deer calves born out of season. British Society of Animal Production, pp. 265-269. AWAL, A. SARKER, N.J. KHAN, R.I. and HUSAIN, K.Z. 1992. Breeding records of samber deer (Cervus unicolor keer) in captivity. Bangladesh. J. Zool. 20(2): 285-290. DE VOS, A. 1990. Applying experience in New Zealand deer farming developing countries. Unasylva (FAO) 41(161): 26-32. FLETCHER, T. 1989. Deer farming in Europe. Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge. pp. 322-333.

Food consumption of barking deer 131 HAMPHRIES, R.E., SMITH, R.H. and SIBLY, R.M. 1989. Effects of human disturbance on the welfare of park fellow deer. Deer 7: 458. KILMASKOSSU, A. 1990. The possibility of deer farming in Irian Jaya IRIAN 18: 87-90. MATTIELO, S., MATTIANGELI, V., BIANCHI, L. and CARENZI, C. 1997. The feeding and social behavior of fallow deer under intensive pasture confinement. J. Anim. Sci. 75(2): 339-347. PRATER, S.H. 1980. The book of Indian animals 3 rd ed. Bombay Natural History Society. pp. 290-295. REINKEN. 1990. General and economic aspects of deer farming. Modern research institute, Edinburgh. pp. 53-59. SCHALL, G.B. 1991. The deer and the tiger. The University of Chicago press. Chicago and London. pp. 257-263. SARKER, N.J. and KHAN, R.I. 1991. Breeding records of barking deer (Muntiacus muntjak) in captivity, Dhaka, Univ, Stud. Part E 6(1): 73-76. SARKER, N.J. and KHAN, R.I. 1991. Breeding observation in captive spotted deer (Axis axis, Erexleben). J. Asiat. Soc. Bangladesh, Sci. 17(1): 67-73. VIDYADARAN, M.K., JAAFAR, M. and IBRAHIM, J. 1993. Deer industry in Malaysia. Faculty of veterinary medicine and animal science. pp. 111-119 YEREX, D. and SPIERS, I. 1990. Modern deer farm management. Revised edition, GP Books, Wellington (New Zealand). pp. 175.