Fully Documented Fisheries

Similar documents
Best Practice Guidance for Assessing the Financial Performance of Fishing Gear: Industry-led gear trials

Towards a mixed demersal fisheries management plan in the Irish Sea. (ICES subdivisions VIIa): framework and objectives

Onshore management of unwanted catch

Fisheries Control Regulations

Sustainable Fisheries for Future Generations The Fisheries White Paper

Fishing opportunities for 2018 under the Common Fisheries Policy

GITAG. Gear Innovation and Technology Advisory Group

The Development of Multi-Rig Trawling Systems in the UK Past, Present and Future?

Statistical News Release

Nephrops Forum Trawl Selectivity

The EU Landing Obligation: Impacts and Solutions Monday 1 February 13:45-15:00. Portomaso Suite 2 & 3 Seafood Summit, Malta

At Sea Simulation of the Landing Obligation on Irish Vessels

Why has the cod stock recovered in the North Sea?

ICES WGCSE REPORT

Sourced from:

Trials of a Net Grid for the UK Nephrops trawl fisheries

Landing Obligation Economic Impact Assessment (EIA) Landing Obligation Economic Impact Assessment (EIA) Final Report Final Report (using 2013

FISHERMEN S SAFETY TRAINING

FLEET ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE DATASET

Turning the tide for low impact fisheries. Ways to improve the CFP reform proposal

Final Report. Discard survival rates of commercially caught ray. Cefas Lowestoft, Exeter

Discard matrix. Figures and ICES commentary. Suggested changes that are necessary to comply with legislation. Targeted fishery.

Opportunities and challenges for fishery by-products and by-catches to contribute to the supply of aquaculture feed ingredients.

5. purse seines 3 000

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Monitoring Fishery Catch to Assist Scientific Stock Assessments in Scottish Inshore Fisheries

Potential Economic Repercussions of a Discards Ban in EU Fisheries

How illegal discarding. failing EU fisheries. and citizens. How illegal discarding in. fisheries and citizens. Executive summary

European Fisheries Fund Project. Sustainable Use of Fisheries Resources in Welsh Waters

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. Fishing Opportunities for 2009 Policy Statement from the European Commission

Bridle angle and wing end spread calculations

THE LANDING OBLIGATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE CONTROL OF FISHERIES

Developments in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 can be found at:

UK Case Study: Discarding by North Sea Whitefish Trawlers

Welsh Waters Scallop Strategy 28 th May Summary of research

A case study review of the potential economic implications of the proposed CFP landings obligation

Evaluation of fisheries dependent information in European waters 5-9 September 2016, Gavirate

Modelling historical distribution of. trawling effort. British steam trawlers in the North Sea

Angling Trust Save Our Sea Bass Bass Position Statement 2018

Environmentally Responsible Fisheries Project FINAL SUMMARY REPORT

EU request to ICES on in-year advice on haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Division 7.a (Irish Sea)

Advice June Sole in Division IIIa and Subdivisions (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and the Belts)

HOOK, LINE AND SINKER EUROPE S COD ON THE BRINK OF RECOVERY OR COLLAPSE?

Selectivity/ Discard Reduction in UK. Mike Montgomerie Gear Technologist Seafish

Can a discard ban be good for fishers?

The landings obligation in view of different management regimes

Management of the North Sea flatfish fishery: exploring alternative ITQ systems IIFET 2014, Brisbane, July 9 th 2014 K. G. Hamon, H. Bartelings, F.

Fisheries data collection of Thai oversea fishing fleet

TECHNICAL MEASURES AND

A reformed CFP needs to be based on sustainability, and use the principle of caution

Aequipecten opercularis fishery management plan. December 2009

Data Provision and evaluation of measures employed in Scotland under the management plan for cod stocks Article 13 provision during 2012

MOANA NEW ZEALAND & SANFORD MĀUI DOLPHIN PROTECTION PLAN

Stuart J. Hetherington, Victoria A. Bendall & Paul Trebilcock. FDI symposium, Rome 3 rd 6 th March 2014

From right-based catch shares to benthic impacts

Christian Skov, Associate Professor Technical University of Denmark, DTU Aqua, Section of Freshwater Fisheries and Ecology

Danish Sampling of Commercial Fishery Overview with special attention to discards 2010 data

The Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit (SEMRU) Research Note. Assessment of the effects of Brexit on Irish and EU fisheries in the NE Atlantic

Not to be cited without prior reference to ANIFPO and AFBI TECHNICAL CONSERVATION TRIALS IN THE NORTHERN IRELAND NEPHROPS FISHERY FINAL REPORT

Devon beam trawlermen reduce discarded juvenile fish by over 50%

Assessment of T90 mesh in a fishery targeting whiting in the Celtic Sea

Fish Landings in Shetland and by the Shetland Fleet in 2012

Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4 and 6, and in Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat)

Collection of Fisheries Information and Fishing Data by the IFG Network

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Unit C Operational Coordination

Fast Tracking the Development of Environmental- Friendly Fishing Methods

LYME BAY HOW IT WORKS. The Reserve is managed by a Consultative Committee; 42 boats fish under voluntary regulation through a code of conduct;

Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) and Subdivision 20 (Skagerrak)

UK Landing Obligation Analysis

Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 7 (northern North Sea, Fladen Ground)

Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 6 (central North Sea, Farn Deeps)

Fish Landings in Shetland and by the Shetland Fleet in 2013

Unit C Operational Coordination

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)

Fast tracking the development of environmentally-friendly fishing methods

BSAC recommendations for the fishery in the Baltic Sea in 2018

By-Catch and Discard Management: The Key to Achieving Responsible and Sustainable Fisheries in Europe

Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 10 (northern North Sea, Noup)

Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel)

STECF work on the Landing Obligation. Advising on: The biggest challenge? The biggest puzzle? The biggest risk?

Unit C Operational Coordination

ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Celtic Seas Ecoregion Published 30 June 2016

The economic implications of changing regulations for deep sea fishing: UK case study

5.16 NETHERLANDS. Short description of the national fleet. Fleet capacity. Fleet structure. Employment. Effort. Production

Comparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare

The Potential Economic Impact on Selected Fishing Fleet Segments of TACs Proposed by ACFM for 2004 (EIAA-model calculations)

SEAFISH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Scottish Demersal Landings Update NORTH EAST WHITE FISH FORUM 21 ST AUGUST 2018

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. The Best Fish from the Best Fishermen

The Orkney Creel Fishery

Sate of play implementation Art 15 CFP - the EU Landing Obligation - Pim Visser, chief executive VisNed

Please note: The present advice replaces the advice given in June 2017 for catches in 2018.

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU)

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Albacore Tuna, South Pacific, Troll, Pole and Line

Haddock, Iceland, ICES Va, Danish Seine

More Food, More Jobs and More Money in the UK. Oceana s Recipe for Fish Recovery

The Orkney Shellfish Research Project

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. Consultation on Fishing Opportunities for 2011

Transcription:

Industry Guidance Note October 2012 Fully Documented Fisheries Catch Quota Trials or fully documented fisheries (FDF) using onboard video cameras (CCTV), coupled with the use of highly selective gears, are seen as a valuable tool to address discards and improve stock recovery. Electronic monitoring has been employed by fisheries managers around the world over the past 20 or so years. Electrically powered technologies can be a cost effective means of monitoring fishing activity. From 1 January 2012 all (EU) fishing vessels over 12 metres must be fitted with a Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) and must complete electronic log (catch reporting) books online at sea. The legislative framework In the EU there is currently no requirement for fishing vessels to carry video monitoring equipment, however other fisheries around the world do use the technology. A number of pilot studies are currently being undertaken within Europe. The drivers are: For managers, video footage provides a very powerful monitoring tool and an excellent way to ensure compliance with a total catch approach. For fishermen, video monitoring allows them to demonstrate good practice, it can be used to reverse the burden of proof so fisherman can demonstrate they are adhering to management rules. In some cases use of CCTV may entitle them to various benefits such as more quota, more days at sea or access to restricted areas. Owners, skippers and crew view onboard cameras in different ways. Some view it as Big Brother; there is concern over how it would be introduced specifically in mixed demersal fisheries; there are worries that advances have been too quick to allow a full understanding of all the implications; and who would bear the installation and running costs. However there may be circumstances where vessel owners see video cameras as a cost effective alternative to an inspector on board. How the technology works The technology is similar in many ways to terrestrial monitoring systems. Cameras are fixed to specific points on a fishing vessel. The number of cameras depends on the fishing operation and the management objectives. In long-line or potting vessels it may be sufficient to fit one camera at a point where it can film the gear coming aboard, while on a trawler there may be cameras trained on the gear, the hopper, the processing table and discarding belt. Cameras may be switched on all the time, or activated by the movement of the vessel over the fishing ground, or by the use of a particular piece of deck equipment, such as the winch. The equipment begins to capture footage of the activity and these images can either be sent electronically to a central monitoring point or saved onboard and collected the next time the vessel visits port. It is not always necessary to collect TVquality images and many systems are effective capturing lower quality images and as few as two images per second.

2 FS72 1012 October 2012. Fully Documented Fisheries. Remote electronic monitoring in practice Since 2009 electronic monitoring, associated with a system of sensors, has been recording all fishing and processing activities on board a number of Member State vessels. The participating vessel owners have been obliged to count all catches of cod against their quotas, including those fish that were below Minimum Landing Size (MLS) and which could not therefore be sold. The participating vessels have been given access to an additional quota of cod (up to a limit of 75% of the amount they could have expected to discard if they were not in the trial). This has allowed fishermen to keep more of what they catch, and at the same time reduce overall fishing mortality. By no longer being allowed to discard small, low value cod, an incentive is created to avoid catching these fish through greater selectivity and avoidance of grounds abundant with small fish. The results have shown that discards have been reduced. First trial in Denmark These initial trials ran from September 2008 to July 2009. DTU Aqua, Denmark s National Institute of Aquatic Resources, tested electronic monitoring on six Danish fishing boats. The study was commissioned by the Danish Government. The project aimed to: Test whether electronic monitoring can be used to provide reliable documentation of the fishing operation and the catches; Investigate a new fishery management system where vessels with full documentation get incentives in the form of increased fishing possibilities. Data were collected from 5,708 hours of fishing. DTU Aqua processed and analysed 81% of all data collected. This equates to 13,935 hours of recording with a data loss of only 2.1%. The trial showed that: fishermen's detailed recordings on fishing events, catch composition and discards can be verified by viewing sensor data and videos; and cod discards were significantly reduced for the trial vessels.

3 FS72 1012 October 2012. Fully Documented Fisheries. Trials in England A vessel that took part in the initial trial Fishermen and scientists at work In May 2010 the Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) initiated a trial to investigate the use of catch quotas to reduce discards of cod in the North Sea. Fishermen who joined the pilot scheme had to account for, and land, all the cod they took out of the sea, regardless of size, with CCTV used for monitoring and enforcement. A pilot trial ran from 1 May 2010 to 31 December 2010 with six vessels (two gill netters, three trawlers and one long-liner). Participating vessels were issued with up to 30% extra cod quota. All six participants demonstrated evidence of change in fishing tactics to avoid capturing small cod and discarding of cod has been low (four vessels have been fully analysed, with discard rates of <1%, 1%, 7%, <1%). http://www.cefas.co.uk/media/434085/english%20catch%20quota%20interim%20report%20(v%203 )%20sept%202010.pdf In 2011 the trial was increased to 15 vessels, three in the South West and 12 in the North Sea. Vessels taking part were not permitted to discard any West Channel sole or North Sea cod, including those below the minimum size. Once each vessels quota for these stocks was used up the vessels had to stop fishing for all species. Vessels taking part were awarded additional quota for sole and cod to account for a proportion of the fish that might otherwise have been discarded. Results show minimal quantities of discards (0.2% of total catches across all species under trial). These quantities were considered minimal and not indicative of deliberate discarding. The trial demonstrated the efficacy of the system to monitor for discarding activity and account for total catch mortality for trial species. In 2010, average discard rates were 38% North Sea cod trawlers and 28% for Western Channel sole beam trawlers. Participating fishermen have also drastically reduced discards of undersized fish of all species to between 0 and 3% of their total catch. http://www.marinemanagement.org.uk/fisheries/management/documents/quotas/cqt_final.pdf The trial is continuing in 2012 with seven vessels in the Western Channel (four are participating in trials involving sole, plaice, angler and megrim) and 12 in the North Sea.

4 FS72 1012 October 2012. Fully Documented Fisheries. Trials in Scotland One of the vessels taking part in the trial Schematic of a typical layout Under the Marine Scotland Catch Quota Management Scheme (CQMS), launched in July 2009, participating vessels must retain on board and land all cod that is caught, regardless of size and marketability, and must cease fishing operations when their individual codcatch ceiling is reached. Participating vessels fully document activities in relation to cod. A trial was launched in July 2009 for skippers to use electronic monitoring on their boats to help reduce fish discards. Seven Scottish skippers were chosen for the initial trial (four whitefish and three Nephrops). In June 2010 the trial was expanded to include 17 vessels. An interim report showed the system could provide the necessary confidence to managers and industry alike to run catch quota arrangements aligned to no discard schemes. Initial signs from the trials suggest this scheme provides a clear and strong economic driver which brings about changes in fishing tactics (spatial, selectivity, diversification). http://www.scotland.gov.uk/topics/marine/sea-fisheries/17681/cqsinterimreport In 2011 Marine Scotland increased the number of approved vessels to 25 (from 58 applicants). An early and recognisable feature of the catch quota trials is that it clearly provides the incentives for skippers to optimise their gear selectivity to maximise economic return. The Marine Scotland report highlights a number of economic considerations which should be read in context. Participation in the 2010 catch quota trial appears to have increased the volume of landings of all species in comparison to a control group, leading to an estimated increase in net fishing revenues of approximately 114,000 per participating vessel. However, this increase in fishing revenues should be set against an increase in operating costs, including leasing in of cod quota and costs of greater effort, such as fuel. On average, vessels spent an additional eight days at sea while participating in the trial. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/topics/marine/sea-fisheries/17681/cqms082011 The trial is continuing in 2012 with 23 vessels taking part.

5 FS72 1012 October 2012. Fully Documented Fisheries. At an EU-level Scottish, UK, Danish and German ministers signed the Aalborg declaration in October 2009. This calls for a system of catch quotas in a fully documented fishery (using onboard cameras) with more responsibility handed to fishermen, providing suitable rewards for their innovations and responsible fishing practices. The Ardoe declaration in October 2010 welcomed EU trialling fully documented fisheries to reduce the level of discards and optimise the revenue secured. In the European pilot studies, the main focus has been to monitor catch onboard vessels. The cameras allow scientists and managers to monitor the whole catch and in some cases, its various fractions, such as discards. Feedback suggests the technology can: help fill knowledge gaps in stock status data; add improved data to the scientific process; verify fishermen's anecdotal evidence; and show that fishers have adapted their fishing techniques to maximise the benefit they receive from participating in the trial including an increase in gear selectivity and spatial/temporal measures to reduce unwanted catch. Written by: Karen Green, Seafish E: k_green@seafish.co.uk Next steps These trials are voluntary and it remains to be seen whether remote monitoring becomes mandatory for some fleets if discard bans are phased in. At present, the scheme is likely to be more applicable to TR1 vessels (white fish trawlers) but there are Western Channel trials with mixed species fisheries. There is some support for expanding the scheme to other species. It is likely that only a small number of candidate stocks would be suitable for catch quota management in the North Sea - cod, haddock, whiting and plaice - but these are a major proportion of all catches. More about Fully Documented Fisheries Case studies of scheme participants: General http://www.fvm.dk/cqm_%28catch_quota_mana gement%29.aspx?id=42783 Footage from a Scarborough-based vessel taking part in the English scheme: http://www.channel4.com/news/cctv-monitoringkeeps-an-eye-on-anything-fishy http://www.seafish.org/retailers/responsiblesourcing/protecting-fish-stocks/discards http://iss-foundation.org/2012/07/25/onboardobservation-goes-high-tech-in-monitoring-trials/ http://news.stv.tv/scotland/north/121540-cctv-onfishing-boats-hailed-success-in-denmark/ http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science -and-technical/dsis136.pdf http://keysnews.com/node/15503 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh4b_rcg7dm Origin Way, Europarc, Grimsby DN37 9TZ t: 01472 252300 f: 01472 268792 e: seafish@seafish.co.uk w: www.seafish.org supporting the seafood industry for a sustainable, profitable future