Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

Similar documents
REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Best Southwest Transportation Committee. North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Fargo Moorhead Metropolitan Area Complete Streets Policy Statement

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

Complete Streets for Louisiana

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Zlatko Krstulich, P.Eng. City of O9awa

Complete streets serve the 1/3 of Hoosiers who do not drive.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning in a Historically Car-Centric Culture: A Focus on Connectivity, Safety, & Accessibility

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

2014 Wisconsin Tribal Transportation Conference. Matt Halada Transportation Planner NE Region

Presentation to NCDOT s Complete Streets Advisory Group. June 22, 2010 Charlotte, NC

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENLO PARK ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Living Streets Policy

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

City Council Agenda Item #6-A CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. John A. Russo City Manager

Complete Streets Training. Georgia Municipal Association June 27, 2016

Chapter 7: Six-Step Implementation Process

Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study (KATS) Complete Streets Policy Approved: Effective: FY 2018 Projects

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

CSS and Complete Streets Partnering with Mn/DOT for Complete Streets. Scott Bradley Director of CSS April 27, 2010 CTS Research Conference

Randy Neufeld National Complete Streets Coalition. September 8, 2008

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

General Design Factors

Policy 101. Vision & Context Project Development Funding

NON MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION/COMPLETE STREETS

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Land Use Patterns. Traditional Modern

Walkable Communities: National Best Practices and Applications in Memphis, TN

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

City of Jeffersonville Complete Streets Workshop

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Complete Streets Policy and Practice

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF AUSTIN COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN:

PBIC Webinar. How to Create a Bicycle Safety Action Plan: Planning for Safety [IMAGE] Oct. 2, 2014, 2 pm

Public Information Meeting #1. Pā ia Community Center 5:30 PM 8:00 PM

LOUISIANA COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. Ellen W. Soll, AICP Principal Soll Planning

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017

COMPLETE STREETS POLICY Exhibit A to Ordinance

ORDINANCE NO

Complete Streets 101: The Basics

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Bicycle RSAs: How to Conduct Road Safety Audits and How to Use Them to Promote Bicyclist Safety. Dan Nabors, PE, VHB Bill DeSantis, PE, VHB

Complete Streets Policies in Charlotte

Stress Bikeway Network

Highway School, Ithaca NY

BICYCLE PUBLIC HEARING INTRODUCTION. Kathy Kleinschmidt, P.E. Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator Dallas District

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

COMMUNITY SCHOOLS AND TRANSPORTATION

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Closing Plenary Session

Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Bikeway Plan for the Roanoke Valley Area MPO Update ACKWOWLEDGEMENTS

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

Funding Sources Appendix I. Appendix I. Funding Sources. Virginia Beach Bikeways and Trails Plan 2011 Page I-1

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

BIKE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT. November 2006

IBI Group November 5, 2012

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES SET-ASIDE PROGRAM

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

What is Going on with Complete Streets

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Open House

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

Update of the Master Transportation Plan s (MTP) Bicycle Element

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Moving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications

Transcription:

Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

Agenda Complete Streets Re-cap NCTCOG Complete Streets Policy Statement Overview Resolution Supporting Complete Streets In North Central Texas Importance of Having a Complete Streets Policy Results Next Steps Discussion

What are Complete Streets? Complete Streets are safe, comfortable, and convenient for travel for everyone, regardless of age or ability motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transportation riders. 3

What Complete Streets Are NOT Prescriptive: not a one size fits all approach A bike lane on every roadway Complete Streets approaches roadway planning and design in a context sensitive manner that focuses on meeting the needs of all roadway users. A rural road with paved shoulders is a great opportunity to capture a complete street. Something that happens overnight It is a gradual process incremental progress is still progress!

Complete Streets Policies A complete streets policy ensures that the entire rightof-way is planned, designed, and operated to provide safe access for all users. 5

Streets Can Benefit Communities Increase capacity Improve safety Better health Economic growth Lower emissions Reduce costs Smarter growth Provide choices 6

Consistent With Federal Guidance 2000 FHWA Guidance: Bicycling and walking facilities will be incorporated into all transportation projects unless exceptional circumstances exist. 7

The Tremendous Potential Of all U.S. trips: 50% are under three miles 28% are one mile or less 72% of trips one mile or less are driven Walking is the second most common form of travel representing 10.9% of all trips. 2008 National Household Travel Survey

NCTCOG Complete Streets Policy Statement Original presentation at the May 18, 2011 BPAC Meeting Discussion after presentation provided starting point for the draft document. Main items discussed: Policy should allow flexibility at the local level Consistency with NCTCOG working documents such as Mobility 2035, etc. Policy Statement drafted during June July 2011 Draft document provided on-line and at the August 17, 2011 BPAC Meeting

NCTCOG Complete Streets Policy Statement Overview Broken out into 7 sections: 1. Background 2. Consistency with Federal and State Guidance and Regulation 3. Policy Statement 4. Implementation 5. Local Implementation Guidance 6. Exceptions 7. Evaluation

1. Background NCTCOG efforts that support Complete Streets Mobility 2035 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program The many benefits of Complete Streets Safety Ease congestion Economic revitalization Improved air quality Offer choice: children and seniors Improve congestion

2. Consistency With Federal And State Guidance And Regulation Congress ISTEA TEA-21 SAFETEA-LU USDOT Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations March 2010 TxDOT Guidelines Emphasizing Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations Memorandum March 2011

3. Policy Statement Guidance not a requirement. Intent: Local governments will consider all modes of transportation during the planning, design, construction, and operation phases. Encourages local governments to adopt an official Complete Streets Policy.

4. Implementation A. Integration in the development of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), products of its Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), and the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). NCTCOG will promote the use of Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) planning. B. Support the development of a complete system of bikeways and pedestrian facilities, including the continued development of the Regional Veloweb. Planning of context-appropriate facilities.

5. Local Implementation Guidance Encourage project sponsors to consider bicyclists and pedestrians in the planning and design of all proposed transportation projects, regardless of funding source, where bicycles and pedestrians are permitted by law. Project sponsors are responsible for determining the most appropriate facility. Ensure that people with disabilities have equitable opportunities to use the public rights-of-way system - Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336)

5. Local Implementation Guidance Local Implementation Strategies: NCTCOG encourages all jurisdictions to utilize these key strategies for all transportation projects. Planning - review codes and encourage public participation Design - provide appropriate bicycle and pedestrian accommodations Construction - maintain accessibility for all users during construction Operations - to include traffic calming, signal retiming and establishing maintenance programs

6. Exceptions Exceptions should be rare. Encourages local governments to adopt an official Complete Streets exception process that involves enhanced public input and to officially document exceptions when they occur. Includes list of possible exceptions : Non-motorized use prohibited by law Cost exceeds 20% of total project Documented absence of current and future need Public consensus that the accommodation is unwanted

7. Evaluation Evaluate and update at least annually. Allows for future amendments to the Policy.

Resolution Supporting Complete Streets In North Central Texas (Attachment 1) Resolution to be presented to the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) Intent: to officially adopt the NCTCOG Complete Streets Policy Statement Includes 7 sections: Adopts the Policy Statement Commits to its implementation Encourages local governments to utilize the NCTCOG Complete Streets Policy Statement Overview

Why Have A Policy? To change practice, integrating the needs of all road users into everyday transportation planning and design practices.

Why Have A Policy? To gradually create a complete network of roads that serve all users.

Why Have A Policy? To save money: in the long run, retrofit projects always cost more than getting it right the first time. 22

Why Have A Policy? To provide innovative transportation planners and engineers with the political and community support for doing things differently.

Results in Charlotte, NC To date, Charlotte has transformed: 19 streets (8 more in the works) 11 intersections (10 pending) 24

Results in Charlotte, NC To date, Charlotte has added: 40 miles of new sidewalks 9 new or rebuilt complete streets (17 more on the way) 25

Complete Streets Policies As of April 2011, over 200 communities have committed to a complete streets approach. 26 As of 01/15/10

Next Steps Draft Regional Policy June - July 2011 Present Draft to BPAC August 17, 2011 Comment Deadline September 16, 2011 STTC Information October 2011 RTC Information November 2011 BPAC Approval November 16, 2011 STTC Approval November 2011/December 2011 RTC Approval December 2011/January 2012 Schedule assumes approvals are received on specified dates

Discussion Are there items missing from the Complete Streets Policy Statement that should be included? Are there items that should be omitted? Is the Policy Statement too specific? Not specific enough?

Questions, comments, complaints, etc. should be emailed to Deb Humphreys at dhumphreys@nctcog.org or mailed to: Deb Humphreys 616 Six Flags Dr. Arlington, TX 76011 Comments will be accepted through September 16, 2011

Questions I can t understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I m frightened of the old ones. - John Cage

Contact Information Deb Humphreys Transportation Planner dhumphreys@nctcog.org (817) 608-2394 NCTCOG Bicycle and Pedestrian Homepage: www.nctcog.org/bikeped