SPM Version 3 Orientation Learning Exercise - Loading Rates Answer Key

Similar documents
APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

Design Assessment Checklist: Infiltration / Detention Basin

MICROMOUND DESIGNERS GUIDE

"QM" DESIGNER'S GUIDE AMERICAN "PERC-RITE " SECONDARY TREATED DRIP SYSTEMS 1 ZONE or 2 ZONE -- SIMPLEX PATENT NO. 5,200,065 & 5,984,574B

Ohio. Ohio. Design and Installation Manual for Quick4 Chambers in Ohio. Infiltrator Chambers in Ohio

On-Site Leaching Chamber Specifications & Features. Design & Installation Manual Minnesota

EFLOW GUIDE. IRRIGATE UP TO 200m 2 SUITS DOMESTIC ONSITE APPLICATIONS

Before we start. Copyright William C Cromer 2015

On-Site Leaching Chamber Specifications & Features. Design & Installation Manual Rhode Island

Agricultural Water: Part 2

Prince Edward Island. Prince Edward Island. Design and Installation Manual for Prince Edward Island. Infiltrator Chambers in

Pathways of a conservative contaminant: Infiltration, fracture conduits, and re-emergence of chloride in wells and streams

Effect of Perched Water Conditions in MSW Landfills: Considerations for Landfill Operators

YOUR ISTRC SYSTEM REPORT CITY FREDERICKSBURG Mr. Bill Hanna

TAO Safety Policy No. HS-5.1 Page 1 of 15 Revision No. 2 Revision Date: July 19, 2005

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

ITEM 400 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

SECTION [ ] [02730] STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE SURFACING

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

Example Applications of the Proposed Medical Diagnostic Equipment Accessibility Standards

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]

ASBA MULTI-FIELD FACILITY AWARDS APPLICATION. Please complete the following or refer to site plan.

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis


"STEEL FRAMED" ALUMINUM PANEL SHIELDS

Men Athletes Uniform. *Athlete s name samples (scale 1:10) Manufacturer s logo 30 cm 2

APPENDIX F DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW SUMMARIES AND REDLINES

Aluminum Sheeting Guide (ASG)

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

Single-Interval Gas Permeability Testing

SPEED SHORE MANUFACTURER S TABULATED DATA "MHS" MODELS. STEEL MANHOLE SHIELDS 4 Single Wall 4 Double Wall 4 Double Wall with Cut-Outs

MEMORANDUM. TNC Fisher Slough Final Design and Permitting Subject: DRAFT Technical Memorandum: Levee Emergency Spillway Design

Application of Expansive Soil Geotechnical Procedures

Full Depth Reclamation ALDOT FDR Requirements Lyndi D. Blackburn, PE

NZQA unit standard 8916 version 8 Page 1 of 5

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION PLAN CERTIFICATION (B)(4) 1

ROAD OCCUPANCY PERMIT APPLICATION # Damascus Township, 60 Conklin Hill Road, Damascus, PA Tel Fax

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS)

City of Los Angeles Department of Building & Safety Disabled Access Section Supplemental Plan Review Checklist No. 8 RECREATION FACILITIES

Pore-Air Entrapment during Infiltration

LPP S STEMS WORKSHEET

PACIFIC SHORING, LLC ALUMINUM SHORING PRODUCTS PSH HEAVY DUTY HYDRAULIC WALER RAIL SYSTEM. TABULATED DATA Effective December 10, 2013

PACIFIC SHORING, LLC ALUMINUM SHORING PRODUCTS HEAVY DUTY HYDRAULIC WALER RAIL SYSTEM. TABULATED DATA Effective August 25, 2015

Jacksonville. Lake City. St Augustine. Ocala Daytona Beach. Leesburg. Orlando. Cape Canaveral. Lakeland Tampa Clearwater Bartow St Petersburg

Construction Dewatering

Clayton Hubbs, Stabilizer Solutions, Inc. Barney Lopas, L.A. Angels of Anaheim Grant Trenbeath, Arizona Diamondbacks

Acid Sulfate Soil Assessment in Finniss River, Currency Creek, Black Swamp and Goolwa Channel, South Australia - Appendices

SPEED SHORE MANUFACTURER S TABULATED DATA MANGUARDS. October 31, 2005

MODULAR ALUMINUM PANEL SHIELDS MAPS

An Improved Understanding of LNAPL Behavior in the Subsurface LNAPL - Part 1

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Maximim Points. Box Breakdowns. 90+ Excellent (EX) Very Good (VG) Good Plus (GP) Good (G) Fair (F) Poor (P) 1st Calver

BINDEX BFM INSTALLATION GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 4: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

Chutes Part 2: Synthetic linings

Written Closure Plan. Pawnee Station - North CCR Landfill Public Service Company of Colorado Denver Colorado. October 17, 2016

Briggs linear 4-wheel chassis irrigation booms. Models R50/2 R57/2 R60/2 R64/2 R76 lane spacing from 50 to 96 metres

Design Data 22M. Flotation of Circular Concrete Pipe. w w I = w - x 1000 (3) (SG x 1000)

STEEL TRENCH SHIELDS DW MODELS

Exercise (3): Open Channel Flow Rapidly Varied Flow

White Paper. Draft Variable Depth Root Zones for Golf Putting Greens. James Crum and Trey Rogers. Michigan State University.

City of Rolling Hills Equestrian Facility Guidelines

SNOWBOARD RESORT INFORMATION SHEET HALFPIPE

ADA Access Standards for Swimming Pools, Wading Pools, and Spas

1 & 3 Meter Tower CAT 1M 203R RIGHT MOUNT CAT 3M 203R CAT 1M 203L LEFT MOUNT CAT 3M 203L CAT 1M 203D DUAL MOUNT CAT 3M 203D

Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

Physical Modeling of Nearshore Placed Dredged Material Rusty Permenter, Ernie Smith, Michael C. Mohr, Shanon Chader

KlassikDrain Section. Technical Handbook and Product Catalog. General purpose trench drainage

CHAPTER 1. The LPP system has three design improvements over conventional systems that help overcome these problems. They are:

Spading to overcome non wetting soil

Auditor Name: Certifying Organization: Audit Location:

Deep Linear shoring. E+S Trench shoring systems / Sliding rail systems. Deep Linear shoring

APPLICATION FOR COURSE HOMOLOGATION

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 3 Curb Ramps & Blended Transitions

1. In most economical rectangular section of a channel, depth is kept equal to

SUPPORTING NOTES FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNBOUND ROAD BASE AND SUB-BASE AGGREGATES

Why do different beaches have different types of vegetation?

Venue Name / Location Complex Esportiu - Futbal Salou Report Number R A1. Primary Sport(s) Football

Grading Plan - Drawing No. C-2 - Project Revision 1 dated January 30, 2018.

WHAT DETERMINES THE STRENGTH OF A SNOW ANCHOR? HOW STRONG DOES A SNOW ANCHOR SYSTEM HAVE TO BE?

IFF Event Identity Guidelines

CHAPTER 68. RANDOM BREAKING WAVES HORIZONTAL SEABED 2 HANS PETER RIEDEl. & ANTHONY PAUL BYRNE

FACILITY NAME: ASBA SINGLE FIELD FACILITY AWARDS APPLICATION. New Construction Upgrade of Existing Facility. Date of completed project:

BALLFIELD CLAYS. Our Ballfield Clay Products have been developed precisely for baseball fields. CONDITIONERS C L A Y - B A S E D S U R F A C E S SANDS

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

Tabulated Data Lite-Shield 20 System

Variable Face Milling to Normalize Putter Ball Speed and Maximize Forgiveness

Safety Policy and Procedure

a useful guide to Linear Assessment

FACILITY NAME: ASBA TRACK AND FIELD FACILITY AWARDS APPLICATION TRACK PORTION

Log Balance Beam. Product: (4 ), (6 )

Study to Establish Relations for the Relative Strength of API 650 Cone Roof Roof-to-Shell and Shell-to- Bottom Joints

Concepts & Phenomena

Revisions to Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (2016 Update)

Township of Springwater

SECTION 2 HILLTOPPER MOUND AND HOMEPLATE CLAY BASEBALL APPLICATIONS. 1. Hilltopper Mound Clay for baseball pitching mound or homeplate areas

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

2010 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DRAWINGS

Transcription:

SPM Version 3 Orientation Learning Exercise - Loading Rates Answer Key These exercises are intended to support your self-directed learning. Answer the questions based on the SPM Version 3 standards and guidelines for determination of hydraulic and linear loading rates and the limited information provided within each question. Assume that there are no further site/soil constraints or other unusual circumstances that affect loading rate selections. Then check the answer key - which includes some helpful SPM references and notes. The correct answers are indicated in bold font. 1. What is the maximum allowable Type 1 HLR for loam texture, blocky structure shape, moderate grade, moderately hard dry consistence? Refer to section II- 5.5 and II- 5.6. For this question, the relevant tables are Table II- 21 and Table II- 22. To determine HLR and LLR, there are different tables for loading rate selection based on either soil type or permeability and percolation rate, so a two pronged approach is required. The lower loading rate from those two approaches is the required standard. You will note that the loading rate tables have different rates for different soil structure and consistence categories (F, P, VP or NA). So, to use those tables for loading rate selection (Table II- 22, 23, 27 and 28) it is first necessary to refer to Table II- 21 to determine the structure and consistence category. See the glossary in Volume I, if you need a refresher about the definitions for structure type, grade and consistence. The USDA Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils has additional detail. Table II- 21 indicates the structure and consistence category is poor (P). The question does not tell us the perc rate or permeability (to simplify learning - one thing at a time). So we will base the answer on the limited information provided, but note that the two approaches are always required - determine the loading rate based on soil type AND percolation rate or permeability THEN choose the most conservative/lowest rate. In this example, with limited information (no perc or Kfs), Table II - 22 lists the maximum HLR as 15 L/m 2. Answer: 15 L/m 2 2. What is the maximum allowable Type 1 LLR for loam texture, blocky structure shape, moderate grade, moderately hard dry consistence slope is 7%, depth of suitable soil is 95 cm? For this question, the relevant tables are Table II- 21 and Table II- 27. Table II- 21 indicates the structure and consistence category is poor (P). In this example, with limited information (no perc or Kfs), Table II - 27 lists the maximum LLR as 45 L/m 2. Answer: 45 L/m 2 Answer Key - SPM Orientation Exercise - HLR and LLR Page 1 of 5

3. For conditions listed in #1 and #2 above, what is the minimum area of infiltrative surface for a system with 1500 L DDF? As per SPM page II- 34, Minimum Area of Infiltrative Surface (AIS) needed (m 2 ) = DDF (L/day) HLR (L/day/m 2 ). AIS = 1500 L/day 15L/m 2 = 100 m 2 Answer: 100m 2 4. For conditions listed in question #1 and #2 above, what is the minimum system length for a system with 1500 L DDF? As per SPM page II- 38, Minimum system contour length (m) = DDF (L/day) LLR (L/day/m) Length = 1500 L/day 45L/m = 33.3 m Note this means the system must be at least 33.3 m long along the level contour. This is not achieved by, for example, three - 11m trenches from an end feed manifold. It could be achieved by, for example, a 3 m wide bed (maximum allowable width of a bed) that is 33.3 m long (100 m 2 AIS) - and of course that would be too long for an end feed manifold. Answer: 33.3 m minimum system contour length 5. What is the maximum allowable Type 1 HLR for soil with fine sand texture, and with depth of that soil horizon extending to at least 30 cm below the infiltrative surface, single grain structure shape, loose consistence, and permeability of 2200 mm/day Kfs? Refer to: Table II- 21, Table II- 22 and Table II- 23. Table II - 21 lists the structure and consistence category as F. Table II- 22 lists the maximum allowable HLR based on soil type as 27L/m 2. Table II- 23 lists the maximum allowable HLR based on permeability as 35L/m 2. Of those two loading rates, the lowest/most conservative is 27L/m 2. Answer: 27 L/m 2 6. What is the maximum allowable Type 1 LLR for fine sand texture, single grain structure shape, loose consistence, slope is 2%, depth of suitable soil is 65 cm, and percolation rate is 4 minutes per inch? Refer to: Table II- 21, Table II- 27 and Table II- 28. Table II - 21 lists the structure and consistence category as F. Table II- 27 lists the maximum allowable LLR based on soil type as 70 L/m 2. Table II- 28 lists the maximum allowable LLR based on percolation rate as 70 L/m 2. The two pronged approach resulted in the same LLR. Answer: 70 L/m 2 Answer Key - SPM Orientation Exercise - HLR and LLR Page 2 of 5

7. For conditions listed in question #5 and #6 above, what is the minimum area of infiltrative surface for a system with 1300 L DDF? AIS = 1300 L/day 27 L/m 2 = 48 m 2 Answer: 48 m 2 8. For conditions listed in question #5 and #6 above, what is the minimum system length for a system with 1300 L DDF? Minimum contour length = 1300 L/day 70 L/m = 18.6 m Note this means the system must be at least 18.6 m long along the level contour. Given the minimum AIS, the configuration could be 48 m 2 18.6 m = 2.6 m wide, 18.6 m long Answer: 18.6 m minimum system contour length 9. Determine the minimum dimensions of a bed dispersal system given the following information: VS is easily met due to significant depth of suitable soil. Soil texture to 50 cm depth below the infiltrative surface is loam. The loam horizon has weak grade, blocky structure with moderately hard dry consistence. The average percolation rate is 28 minutes per inch. DDF is 1300 L/day, with type 2 effluent. The slope within the dispersal area and the downslope receiving area is 7%. (Fill in the blanks) The structure and consistence category is and the maximum allowable HLR based on soil type is the maximum allowable HLR based on percolation rate is therefore, the applicable HLR is... and the min. AIS is. The maximum allowable LLR based on soil type is the maximum allowable LLR based on percolation rate is therefore, the applicable LLR is... and the minimum system contour length is. The minimum dimensions of a dispersal bed are long and wide. Refer to: o Table II- 21 for structure and consistence category. o Table II- 22 for HLR based on soil type. o Table II- 23 for HLR based on percolation rate. o Table II - 27 and 28 for LLR. Answer Key - SPM Orientation Exercise - HLR and LLR Page 3 of 5

Answers: The structure and consistence category is very poor and the maximum allowable HLR based on soil type is 25 L/day/m 2 the maximum allowable HLR based on percolation rate is 40 L/day/m 2 therefore, the applicable HLR is 25 L/day/m 2... and the min. AIS is 1300 L DDF 25 L/m 2 = 52 m 2. The maximum allowable LLR based on soil type is 24 L/m the maximum allowable LLR based on percolation rate is 50 L/m therefore, the applicable LLR is 24 L/m... and the minimum system contour length is 1300 L DDF 24 L/m = 54 m. The minimum dimensions of the dispersal bed are 54 m long and 52 m 2 AIS 54 m length = 1 m wide. 10. Determine the minimum dimensions of a bed dispersal system on a raised sand mound given the following information: The proposed sand media meets the ASTM C33 specifications but there is 6% passing the No. 100 sieve and 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. Assume VS standards are met. Soil texture to 30 cm depth below the original grade is loam. Underlying soil is seasonally wet. The loam horizon has weak grade, blocky structure with friable moist consistence. The average percolation rate is 18 minutes per inch. DDF is 1300 L/day, with type 1 effluent. The slope within the dispersal area and the downslope receiving area is 7%. The structure and consistence category of the underlying soil is and the maximum allowable basal HLR based on soil type is the maximum allowable basal HLR based on percolation rate is therefore, the applicable basal HLR is... and the min. basal area is. The maximum allowable LLR based on soil type is the maximum allowable LLR based on percolation rate is therefore, the applicable LLR is... and the minimum system contour length is. The maximum allowable sand media HLR is and the minimum AIS is the minimum dimensions of a dispersal bed are long and wide which meets / does not meet (select one) the basal loading check. Answer Key - SPM Orientation Exercise - HLR and LLR Page 4 of 5

Refer to: o Section II- 5.5.3.1.(a) for standards related to basal area of a sand mound. o Section III- 5.5.3.1 for guidelines related to HLRs for sand media and basal soil. o Table II- 21 for structure and consistence category. o Table II- 22 for HLR based on soil type for the underlying loam basal soil. o Table II- 23 for HLR based on percolation rate of the underlying basal soil. o Table II - 27 and 28 for LLR, and section II- 5.6.5 for system contour length of raised systems. o Section III- 5.5.3.2 for guidance about sand media and HLR. o Table II- 25 to determine which category of sand media is applicable. o Table II- 24 for clean course sand HLR. Answers: The structure and consistence category of the underlying soil is poor (P) and the maximum allowable basal HLR based on soil type is 30 L/m 2 (type 2 basal HLR) the maximum allowable basal HLR based on percolation rate is 40 L/m 2 therefore, the applicable basal HLR is 30 L/m 2... and the min. basal area is 1300 L DDF 30 L/m 2 = 43 m 2. The maximum allowable LLR based on basal soil type is 35 L/m the maximum allowable LLR based on basal percolation rate is 45 L/m therefore, the applicable LLR is 35 L/m... and the minimum system contour length is 1300 L DDF 35 L/m = 37 m. The maximum allowable sand media HLR is 30 L/m 2 and the minimum AIS is 1300 L DDF 30 L/m 2 = 43 m 2 the minimum dimensions of a dispersal bed are 37 m long and 43 m 2 AIS 37 m length = 1.2 m wide, which easily meets the basal loading check (since the sand media loading rate and basal loading rate are identical and the effective basal area is much greater than the bed area - the basal check is based on the bed area plus the area under the downslope toe of the mound). Answer Key - SPM Orientation Exercise - HLR and LLR Page 5 of 5