Secondary Road Program

Similar documents
New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

GDOT Fiscal 2015 Year 2017 GDOT PowerPoint. Title Page

Fairfax County Transportation Funding and Roadway Service Delivery Study. Study Update Transportation Advisory Commission

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

New Mexico Transportation Funding Challenges

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

GDOT GDOT PowerPoint. Title Page

Traffic Accident Data Processing

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Michael D. Turpeau Jr. State Safety Program Supervisor Georgia Department of Transportation

KY s s RSA Evolution. Jo Anne Tingle, PE Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) AASHTO TIG/FHWA RSA PEER Exchange Little Rock, AR - April 29, 2008

NORTH HIGHLAND LAKE ROAD PROJECT

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

CHAPTER 7 CIRCULATION

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

HIGHWAY 11 CORRIDOR STUDY

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Zlatko Krstulich, P.Eng. City of O9awa

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Project Status Update

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

North Carolina Transportation Issues

Section 8. Partnerships and Funding

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO

land transport road assets

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Purpose. Process. Recommendations

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES

Readington Road (C.R. 637) Construction

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E. Town of Malabar Briefing (July 17, 2017)

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

Project Update May 2018

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

County of Fairfax, Virginia. Department of Transportation

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR SCDOT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

FMATS Transportation Improvement Program Project Nomination Form

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

MN 5 Corridor Performance. Current Corridor Characteristics Highway: MN AADT: 2,400 73,000

Route 29 Solutions Projects

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

land transport road assets

Non-State Federal Aid Highways. Pavement Condition Ratings. H e r k i m e r a n d O n e i d a C o u n t i e s

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Technical Memorandum. Shoulder Width Standards for State Highways. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction. Purpose

Off-road Trails. Guidance

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

2.0 Existing Conditions

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

4-County Big Oil Oil Impacts Analysis Dunn, McKenzie, Mountrail, & Williams Counties in association with:

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION HEARING

Executive Summary June 2015

Phone: Fax: Project Reference No. (to be filled out by MassHighway):

Platte County Roads Master Plan

Parks Highway: MP Lucus Road to Big Lake Road

North Carolina Department of Transportation American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Division One Highway Infrastructure Program Summary

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

Project Description Form 8EE

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

SALES ASSESSMENT RATIO STUDIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2013

Shenango Valley MPO. State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

2016 FACT SHEET ENGINEERING STREET OPERATIONS. Engineering Street Operations net 2016 budget is $5,199,900 WHAT IS ENGINEERING STREET OPERATIONS?

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

FUNDING SOURCES CHAPTER 6

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Last Reval. Tax Rate Equiv

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Transportation Safety Planning at DVRPC

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Route 7 Corridor Study

FUTURE MOBILITY IN TEXAS: The Cost of Meeting the State s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility

Safety Data Resources. Multi-Discipline Safety Planning Forum March 10 & 11, 2008 Gateway Center

Now Let s Think Systemic

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

Transcription:

Secondary Road Program Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee October 5, 2012 1

Secondary Roads Program The Big Picture The Secondary Road System Needs and Project Types Paved and Unpaved Looking Forward Prioritization Considerations 2

North Carolina State Highway System NCDOT responsible for the Planning, Design, Construction, Maintenance and Operation of 79,185 road miles Approximately 15,000 miles of primary Approximately 64,000 miles of secondary ~3,800 miles of unpaved roads In accordance with Work Program, Principals Asset Management, Targeted Levels of Service 3

NC Secondary Road System ~64,000 mile Network 4

What is a Secondary Road? 5

6

Urban. 7

Rural Suburban 8

9

Wide Variety of Dirt Roads 10

Div. 13 4,144 6.4% Division Distribution of Secondary Roads Div. 11 5,070 7.9% Div. 9 4,367 6.8% Div. 7 4,533 7.0% Div. 5 5,465 8.5% Div. 4 4,870 7.6% Div. 1 3,801 5.9% Div. 14 3,969 6.2% Div. 12 5,202 8.1% Div. 10 4,144 6.4% Div. 8 5,775 9.0% Div. 6 4,857 7.5% Div. 3 4,284 6.7% Div. 2 3,934 6.1% 11

Secondary Road Funding Routine Maintenance (Highway Fund) Contract Resurfacing (Highway Fund) System Preservation (Highway Fund) Secondary Road Improvement Program (Highway Fund & Highway Trust Fund) 12

Routine Maintenance Highway Fund appropriations distributed for use within county boundaries: - $50,000 Uniform Allocation - 90% Based on county road miles compared to state road miles - 10% based on county population compared to state population General Maintenance Reserve fund distributed to Divisions based on pro-rata share of lane miles to help address maintenance needs identified by the Department s Maintenance Condition Assessment Program Serves as primary funding source for all routine highway maintenance operations: - Mowing - Operation of rest area and welcome centers - Patching - Guardrail Repair - Drainage - Litter Pickup - Snow Removal - Shoulder Work - Routine Bridge Maintenance and small pipe replacement 13

Contract Resurfacing Highway Fund appropriations distributed for use within county boundaries: - 50% Based on needs identified by the Department s Pavement Condition Survey Program - 37.5% Based on lane miles - 12.5% based on population Serves as the primary fund source for pavement resurfacing needs: Provide renewed driving surface Improves ride quality Reduces patching and frequent maintenance Performed by Contract 14

System Preservation Revenue Source Highway Fund Funds used for chip seals, crack sealing, pavement markings and markers, painting structural steel, replacing expansion joints and waterproofing bridge decks Portion allocated to Divisions based on pro-rata share of bridge deck area for bridge preservation activities Remainder allocated to Divisions based on pro-rata share of total paved lane miles All System Preservation Funds allocated in this biennium were designated for bridge improvements 15

Secondary Road Improvement Program Revenue Source Highway and Highway Trust Fund Funds used to pave unpaved roads and modernize the paved secondary system Funds allocated for use within county boundaries in accordance with G.S. 136-44.2A and G.S. 136-44.5 NCDOT presents programs to county commissions annually for concurrence (G.S. 136-44.8) NCDOT provides progress reports to county commissions annually (G.S. 136-44.8) Allocation Formula: Total miles of secondary roads in County Total miles of secondary roads in State 16

Historical Expenditures 10 year look at Secondary Roads Expenditures ($M) Fiscal Year Routine Maintenance Contract Resurfacing System Preservation Secondary Improvement Program TOTAL 2003 249.94 61.59-132.23 443.76 2004 256.23 79.92-154.19 490.34 2005 270.99 69.67-142.44 483.11 2006 355.60 72.72-78.02 506.34 2007 289.73 111.06 35.24 171.28 607.31 2008 301.53 132.61 56.19 185.90 676.25 2009 279.32 96.05 60.86 143.79 580.02 2010 291.79 137.81 52.60 65.65 547.85 2011 341.56 159.07 96.79 114.68 712.10 2012 325.69 223.75 56.84 150.87 757.15 2962.39 1144.27 358.53 1339.05 5804.24 17

State Maintained Unpaved Roads 18

What is Left ~ 3800 miles of Unpaved SR Routes Miles on Hold List: 1927 Miles Eligible for Rating: 1842 19

Div. 13 205.0 68.7 Distribution of UnPaved Secondary Roads Miles Div. 11 250.7 511.8 Div. 9 73.3 106.2 Div. 7 82.7 127.6 Div. 5 28.0 207.7 Div. 4 56.7 67.7 Div. 1 238.9 51.6 Div. 14 466.1 22.2 Hold List = Red Non-Hold List = Blue Div. 12 33.9 182.2 Div. 10 31.3 74.2 Div. 8 170.9 160.8 Div. 6 148.5 70.4 Div. 3 80.5 36.4 Div. 2 60.3 154.2 20

Paving Priority Selection Un-paved Road Improvement Projects: Periodic Rating Cycle with point system - Land use Characteristics - Traffic Volume - Route Characteristics 100 County Specific Prioritization Lists 21

Paving Program Challenges Right-of-Way Constructability and environmental permitting issues Maintenance costs of paved vs. unpaved roads Increasing cost of construction versus homes served 22

Statutory Changes 2005-2006 Began to transition to an Improvement Program to better address safety and mobility needs through modernization improvements on the secondary road system Incorporate widening, resurfacing, safety, and bridge replacement projects on the Secondary Paved System (Modeled the NC Moving Ahead program) Emphasis placed on completion of the paving program to the extent possible in counties where the unpaved mileage is significant. 23

House Bill 950 (Fiscal Year 2012-13) Statewide Prioritization PRIORITIZE PAVING OF UNPAVED ROADS THROUGHOUT THE STATE SECTION 24.15. For fiscal year 2012-2013, the Department of Transportation shall expend funds allocated to the paving of unpaved secondary roads for the paving of unpaved secondary roads based on a statewide prioritization. The Department shall pave the eligible unpaved secondary roads that receive the highest priority ranking within this statewide prioritization, notwithstanding the distribution formula in G.S. 136-17.2A or any other funding distribution formula in law. This section applies to funding for the paving of secondary roads from both the Highway Fund and the Highway Trust Fund. 24

Executing One-Year Statutory Change Requirements: Had to create a statewide priority list Had to fully fund prioritized projects with one year s allocation Had to determine anticipated expenditures for FY2012-2013 for paving unpaved roads 25

Executing One-Year Statutory Change Approach: Determined roads anticipated to be programmed with FY2012-2013 funds 194 unpaved roads in 50 Counties Determined amount that could be funded and expended with FY2012-13 funds $12.3M Applied $12.3 million to 194 eligible roads in statewide priority list 20 counties 47 roads 18.89 miles 26

Distribution of Allocations for SW Priority List SUMMARY OF SW PRIORITY Total Length Div County Total Dollars # Roads (mi) 1 Dare $125,000 1 0.23 2 Beaufort $200,000 1 0.35 2 Pitt $100,000 1 0.22 3 Sampson $50,000 1 0.41 9 Davidson $475,000 1 0.32 9 Rowan $440,000 3 0.58 10 Cabarrus $990,825 3 1.48 10 Mecklenburg $40,000 1 0.06 11 Ashe $680,000 1 0.80 11 Avery $300,000 1 0.37 11 Caldwell $800,000 1 1.20 11 Watauga $1,900,000 1 2.90 11 Wilkes $1,200,000 1 1.80 12 Alexander $400,000 1 0.45 12 Catawba $1,570,500 13 2.83 12 Iredell $1,377,778 2 1.70 12 Lincoln $33,000 1 0.06 13 Buncombe $901,000 10 1.64 13 Mitchell $140,000 1 0.23 14 Henderson $550,000 2 1.26 $12,273,103 47 18.89 20 Counties receive "off-the-top" allocations 27

1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Miles of Dirt Road Paving > 13,000 Miles Paved from 1989 to 2011 28 0

Paved Road Improvement Projects Access & Mobility Industrial road improvements, school bus access, small bridge and pipe replacement Safety straighten curves, intersection alignment, lane widening, shoulders widening, turn lanes, sight distance improvements 29

Project Selection Guidelines for Paved Road Improvements Traffic Volume > 1500 Average Daily Traffic Lane Width < 11 feet Shoulder Width (Vehicle Recovery Area) Crash Data Traffic Flow Assessment Minimal Right of Way Requirements Minimal Environmental Impacts 30

31

32

33

34

Looking Forward Unpaved Roads and Paved Roads How does North Carolina address the needs of the secondary road system with limited resources and increasing demand and inventory? 35

Looking Forward Unpaved Roads Consider continuing the statewide paving priority system for unpaved roads Consider minimum threshold for paving unpaved roads For example, minimum traffic volumes, land use density, etc Consider designating a portion of secondary road program funds for paving prioritized unpaved roads 36

Looking Forward Unpaved Roads Potential benefits of prioritized system Increases confidence that funds are being expended on projects of greatest need Continues commitment to pave unpaved roads Potential impacts of prioritized system Less local involvement Negative reaction from property owners 37

Looking Forward Paved Roads Consider authorizing the development and use of a prioritization process for secondary road improvements based on safety, mobility and access criteria. Consider allocating remaining Secondary Road Improvement Program funds, not used for paving unpaved roads, to this new program. Consider refining funding allocation criteria to address corridor improvements and isolated problem areas 38

Looking Forward Paved Roads Benefits: Focuses resources on projects of greatest need Allows resources to be focused on congestion and access mitigation Allows for multi-year and regional planning Potential to modernize key roadways to better link business centers and residential areas Increases flexibility to address safety issues, resulting in lower accident rates and fatalities Impacts: Funds following need, not inventory 39

Questions? 40