Supplementary information:

Similar documents
[ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY PAAKITSOQ 2010]

WCA gas trap results and ebullition modeling: testing an ebullition model shows the importance of pore structure

Aerobic reoxidation in marine sediments

The culture-historical background

3.6 Magnetic surveys. Sampling Time variations Gradiometers Processing. Sampling

Observed Roughness Lengths for Momentum and Temperature on a Melting Glacier Surface

Table of contents. I Drawings 33. A1 Design criteria 1 A1.1 Local thermal discomfort indices... 1

Evaluation of the function of Vertical drains.

Inuvik Wind Monitoring Update 2016

Chapter 12 Practice Test

High Ping Rate Profile Water Mode 12

HOW TO DIG A TEST PIT

Seawater. Earth is an Ocean Planet

DESIGN OF SCOUR PROTECTION FOR THE BRIDGE PIERS OF THE 0RESUND LINK

Walk - Run Activity --An S and P Wave Travel Time Simulation ( S minus P Earthquake Location Method)

2016 ANNUAL FISH TRAWL SURVEY REPORT

FISH 415 LIMNOLOGY UI Moscow

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

Influence of Persons' Movements on Ventilation Effectiveness Brohus, Henrik; Hyldig, Mikkel; Kamper, Simon; Vachek, Ulla Maria

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION August 2011 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

Flow modelling hills complex terrain and other issues

Analysis of 24-Hour Pump Test in Well NC-EWDP-3S, Near Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Identify the Principal Investigator for this data set, including general affiliation, if applicable.

N. Robinson and A. Pyne

Studies of Polar Caps by HEND

SWI NAPL Recovery. Cemcor Environmental Services. represented by. Contact: Craig Marlow Phone Cell

The 2008 North Atlantic Bloom Experiment. Calibration Report #3

Results for the stratosphere

Section I: Multiple Choice Select the best answer for each problem.

Calculus 12: Evaluation 3 Outline and Review

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Stadium Project - DP-70 Atlanta, GA, 9/30/2014

FPN/2014. Arctic Sailing

CHANGE OF THE BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IN THE MICROWAVE REGION DUE TO THE RELATIVE WIND DIRECTION

Wind Flow Validation Summary

The NAO index was slightly negative and the westerlies was weakened, i.e. anomaly easterlies.

Effect of airflow direction on human perception of draught

4 RESERVOIR ENGINEERING

The Greenlanders House

Fine-Scale Survey of Right and Humpback Whale Prey Abundance and Distribution

White Paper. Draft Variable Depth Root Zones for Golf Putting Greens. James Crum and Trey Rogers. Michigan State University.

Urban Environmental Climate Maps for Urban Planning Considering Urban Heat Island Mitigation in Hiroshima

IN-PLACE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8

Wind Monitoring Update for Tuktoyaktuk, Winter 2009

Mesoscale air-sea interaction and feedback in the western Arabian Sea

Deep Sea Offshore Wind Power R&D Seminar Trondheim, Jan. 2011

SHORELINE EVOLUTION DUE TO HIGHLY OBLIQUE INCIDENT WAVES AT WALVIS BAY, NAMIBIA

Numerical Simulation of Basal Aquifer Depressurization in the Presence of Dissolved Gas An Update

Legendre et al Appendices and Supplements, p. 1

F E H M A R N B E L T B I R D S. Bird Investigations in Fehmarnbelt - Baseline

(Received 9 September 1940)

Situated 250km from Muscat in

Robin J. Beaman. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.

Application of Flex-Z release agent with a pneumatic gun

Saphir Guided Session #8

THE EXPANSION OF THE PORT OF HANSTHOLM THE FUTURE CONDITIONS FOR A BYPASS HARBOUR

Characterization of Boundary-Layer Meteorology During DISCOVER-AQ

OPERATIONAL AMV PRODUCTS DERIVED WITH METEOSAT-6 RAPID SCAN DATA. Arthur de Smet. EUMETSAT, Am Kavalleriesand 31, D Darmstadt, Germany ABSTRACT

Lecture 8 questions and answers The Biological Pump

Impact of Typhoons on the Western Pacific: Temporal and horizontal variability of SST cooling Annual Report, 2011 James F. Price

P.O.Box 43 Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway Tel.: , Fax: Statkraft,Postboks 200 Lilleaker, 0216 Oslo, Norway ABSTRACT

m v = 1.04 x 10-4 m 2 /kn, C v = 1.29 x 10-2 cm 2 /min

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

FIRST NAME: (PRINT ABOVE (UNDERNEATH LAST NAME) IN CAPITALS)

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF GUIDED WAVE TRAVEL TIME TOMOGRAPHY

Department of Civil & Geological Engineering GEOE Engineering Geology

Cubzac-les-Ponts Experimental Embankments on Soft Clay

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

MIRABAY PILOT PROJECT REPORT

NERC GEOPHYSICAL EQUIPMENT FACILITY LOAN 904 SCIENTIFIC REPORT

EXPEDITION ADVENTURE PART 2: HIGHER RESOLUTION RANGE SEISMIC IMAGING TO LOCATE A SUNKEN PIRATE SHIP OFF ILE ST MARIE.

Estimation of polluted area in case of potential leakage of the chemical munitions

Seasonal Evaluation of Temperature Inversion

THE CIRCULATION IN THE NORTERN PART OF THE DENMARK STRAIT AND ITS VARIABILITY ABSTRACT

Extreme - GREENLAND Dates: Aug 14 Aug Price: 2,190 D&D Member: 1,990

Temperature, salinity, density, and the oceanic pressure field

WAVE FORECASTING FOR OFFSHORE WIND FARMS

Outline. Wind Turbine Siting. Roughness. Wind Farm Design 4/7/2015

Underwater measurement of photosynthetically active radiation

Greens Playing Quality

Snare Wind Monitoring Update 2016

SOIL GAS fluxes to the atmosphere represent an integration

_ pressure transducers. User Manual

METHODS PAPER: Downstream Bathymetry and BioBase Analyses of Substrate and Macrophytes

Ancient Harp Seal Hunters of Disko Bay

170 points. 38 points In your textbook, read about modern oceanography. For each item write the word that meets the description.

+ R. gr T. This equation is solved by the quadratic formula, the solution, as shown in the Holton text notes given as part of the class lecture notes:

Poland is one of the new countries, which seems to have the potential of being a large market for wind energy projects in the near future.

Emission Inventory Evaluation Using DISCOVER-AQ Aircraft Data

Integration of time-lapse seismic and production data in a Gulf of Mexico gas field

Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT)

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Validation Study of the Lufft Ventus Wind Sensor

Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc.

Real Life Turbulence and Model Simplifications. Jørgen Højstrup Wind Solutions/Højstrup Wind Energy VindKraftNet 28 May 2015

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

g) Use the map compass to provide the general locality of the knoll on the chart.

Modelling atmospheric stability with CFD: The importance of tall profiles

Investigation of Cultural and Environmental History on the Hudson River Superfund Site, NY February 2011

Transcription:

Supplementary information: Climate change and the loss of organic archaeological deposit in the Arctic Jørgen Hollesen 1,2, Henning Matthiesen 1, Anders Bjørn Møller 3, Andreas Westergaard-Nielsen 2 and Bo Elberling 2 1 Department of Conservation and Natural Sciences, National Museum of Denmark, I.C. Modewegsvej, Brede, DK-28 Lyngby, Denmark 2 Center for Permafrost (CENPERM), Department of Geoscience and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 1, DK-135, Copenhagen K., Denmark 3 Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 2, DK-883, Tjele, Denmark Corresponding author: e-mail joergen.hollesen@natmus.dk

Supplementary figure S1: The midden at Qajaa (outline marked with red) is located on a small cape on the southern side of the Ilulissat Ice Fjord. Seen from the west. (Photo: Bjarne Grønnow, National Museum of Denmark; Map: Kent Pørksen, University of Copenhagen).

Supplementary figure S2: The midden at Qajaa is up to 3 m thick and contains remains of the the Saqqaq, Dorset and Thule cultures. In 29 a permafrost core was extracted from the site, after which monitoring equipment was installed at various depths. The equipment was connected to a weather station with a datalogger (right picture). (Photo: Jesper Stub Johnsen, National Museum of Denmark (Left and middle) and Jørgen Hollesen, National Museum of Denmark (Right) ; Map: Kent Pørksen, University of Copenhagen).

Supplementary figure S3: The midden at Kangeq is located around a small inlet in the archipelago outside of Nuuk. Seen from the South. (Photo: Jørgen Hollesen, National Museum of Denmark; Map: Kent Pørksen, University of Copenhagen).

Supplementary figure S4: The midden at Kangeq contains well-preserved organic artefacts including wood, mollusk shells and feathers. Most of the midden was accumulated by the Thule culture (1,3AD present), but layers from the Saqqaq (2,5 8 BC) and Dorset (3BC 6AD) cultures are also present. In 212 a pit was excavated vertically into the midden and temperature probes and soil water sensors were installed and connected to a datalogger (Right). (Photo: Jørgen Hollesen, National Museum of Denmark; Map: Kent Pørksen, University of Copenhagen).

Supplementary figure S5: The midden at Sandnes (marked with red) is located between a Norse ruin and the shoreline of a small cape. (Photo: Jørgen Hollesen, National Museum of Denmark; Map: Kent Pørksen, University of Copenhagen).

Supplementary figure S6: In 212 a south-east facing profile from a previous excavation was cleaned at Sandnes. Samples were collected and temperature probes and soil water sensors were installed at various depths. Furthermore, a meteorological station was installed approximately 1 m west of the midden, 8 m.a.s.l (right). (Photo: Jørgen Hollesen, National Museum of Denmark; Map: Kent Pørksen, University of Copenhagen).

Supplementary figure S7: The cultural layers at Igaliku are located underneath the surface of a small wetland. This Norse site contains a large number of well-preserved artefacts including worked wood and animal bones. In 212 two pits were excavated vertically into the cultural layers and temperature probes and soil water sensors were installed and connected to a datalogger. (Photo: Jørgen Hollesen, National Museum of Denmark; Map: Kent Pørksen, University of Copenhagen).

Depth (m) % of water filled pore space 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 -.25 -.5 -.75-1 -1.25-1.5 Supplementary figure S8 : Mean soil water content from 1 June to 31 August 213 (open black symbols) and from 1 June to 15 August 214 (filled grey symbols) at Qajaa (squares), Sandnes (circles), Kangeq (triangles) and Igaliku (diamonds). The horizontal bars show the variation from the minimum to the maximum daily means observed during the two periods.

Qajaa (-.5 m) Qajaa (-.6 m) Qajaa (-1. m) Sandnes (-.15 m) Sandnes (-.3 m) Sandnes (-.45 m) Sandnes (-.6 m) Sandnes (-.75 m) Sandnes (-.9 m) Sandnes (-1.5 m) Sandnes (-1.2 m) Sandnes (-1.35 m) Sandnes (-1.5 m) Kangeq (-.25 m) Kangeq (-.35 m) Kangeq (-.45 m) Kangeq (-.55m) Kangeq (-.65 m) Igaliku P1 (-.3 m) Igaliku P1 (-.4 m) Igaliku P1 (-.6 m) Igaliku P2 (-.4 m) Igaliku P2 (-.5 m) Igaliku P2 (-.6 m) (µmol CO 2 dry soil -1 day -1 ) (µmol O 2 dry soil -1 day -1 ) 4 3 2 A 1 2 1.5 1.5 B Supplementary figure S9: a) O 2 consumption and b) CO 2 production rates measured at 5 o C. Error bars show ±1 standard deviation (n =3).

Qajaa (-.5 m) Qajaa (-.6 m) Qajaa (-1. m) Sandnes (-.15 m) Sandnes (-.3 m) Sandnes (-.45 m) Sandnes (-.6 m) Sandnes (-.75 m) Sandnes (-.9 m) Sandnes (-1.5 m) Sandnes (-1.2 m) Sandnes (-1.35 m) Sandnes (-1.5 m) Kangeq (-.25 m) Kangeq (-.35 m) Kangeq (-.45 m) Kangeq (-.55m) Kangeq (-.65 m) Igaliku P1 (-.3 m) Igaliku P1 (-.4 m) Igaliku P1 (-.6 m) Igaliku P2 (-.4 m) Igaliku P2 (-.5 m) Igaliku P2 (-.6 m) (J g dry soil -1 day -1 ) (µmol O 2 g dry soil -1 day -1 ) 12 1 8 6 4 2 A 8 6 B 4 2 Supplementary figure S1: A) O 2 consumption and b) Heat production rates measured at 16 o C. Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation (n =3).

Normalized oxygen consumption 15 1 5 5 1 15 2 Temperature ( o C) Supplementary Figure S11: O 2 consumption measured at.5, 5, 1, and 16 o C. Measurement were made on samples from Qajaa (Squares), Sandnes (circles), Kangeq (triangles), and Igaliku (diamonds). Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation (n =3). Data is normalized according to the minimum value. The Q 1 values derived are shown in supplementary table S4.

(µmol O 2 g dry soil -1 day -1 ) 1 8 6 4 2 Igaliku (-.6 m) Igaliku (-.4 m) Igaliku (-.3 m) Kangeq (-.55m) Kangeq (-.35 m) Sandnes (-.9 m) Sandnes (-.3 m) Supplementary Figure S12: O 2 consumption at saturated water contents (blue) and after 24 hours of draining (grey). Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation (n =3).

Asiaq. Archaeological data: NKA. Supplementary Figure S13: Map of South and West Greenland featuring archaeological sites that are registered in the official Greenlandic heritage data base (Map: Greenlandic heritage data base, http://nunniffiit.natmus.gl/cbkort?).

Log (µmol O 2 g dry soil -1 day -1 ) day -1 ) Log (J g dry soil -1 day -1 ) 1.5 -.5-1 A.5 1 1.5 2 Log (µmol CO 2 dry soil -1 1.5 -.5-1 B.5 1 1.5 2 1.5 -.5-1 C.5 1 1.5 2 Log (% carbon) Log (% carbon) Log (% carbon) Supplementary Figure S14: Linear correlation between logarithmic transformed carbon content and A) O 2 consumption rates (5 o C), B) CO 2 production rates (5 o C), and B) Heat production rates (16 o C), measured at Qajaa, Sandnes and Kangeq.

Qajaa (-.5 m) Qajaa (-.6 m) Qajaa (-1. m) Sandnes (-.15 m) Sandnes (-.3 m) Sandnes (-.45 m) Sandnes (-.6 m) Sandnes (-.75 m) Sandnes (-.9 m) Sandnes (-1.5 m) Sandnes (-1.2 m) Sandnes (-1.35 m) Sandnes (-1.5 m) Kangeq (-.25 m) Kangeq (-.35 m) Kangeq (-.45 m) Kangeq (-.55m) Kangeq (-.65 m) Igaliku P1 (-.3 m) Igaliku P1 (-.4 m) Igaliku P1 (-.6 m) Igaliku P2 (-.4 m) Igaliku P2 (-.5 m) Igaliku P2 (-.6 m) (J g C -1 day -1 ) (µmol CO 2 gc -1 day -1 ) (µmol O 2 gc -1 day -1 ) 2 15 1 5 3 2 1 15 1 5 A B C Supplementary Figure S15: A) O 2 consumption rates per g C (5 o C), B) CO 2 consumption rates per g C (5 o C), and C) heat production rates per g C (16 o C).

Supplementary Table S1: Result of reclassification into 11 and 1 classes respectively with equal intervals for air temperature and precipitation. The total areas differ due to different data sets with different ground resolution, hence when masking unwanted surfaces out the number of affected pixels will differ. Estimated annual average air temperature Estimated average annual precipitation Class Interval [ o C] Area [km 2 ] Class Interval [mm year -1 ] Area [km 2 ] 1-12.5 to -11 283 1 25 to 4 4414 2-11 to -9.5 1466 2 4 to 55 16371 3-9.5 to -8 448 3 55 to 7 461 4-8 to -6.5 192 4 7 to 85 16577 5-6.5 to -5 2273 5 85 to 1 13939 6-5 to -3.5 34529 6 1 to 115 5832 7-3.5 to -2 24963 7 115 to 13 3884 8-2 to -.5 15936 8 13 to 145 1174 9 -.5 to 1 139 9 145 to 16 1561 1 1 to 2.5 4955 1 16 to 175 218 11 2.5 to 4 29 Total -12.5 to 4 129574 Total 25 to 175 1458

Supplementary Table S2: Spatial representativeness of the four study sites based on data from Supplementary Table 1. Numbers presented in parenthesis are based on areas < 1 meter above sea level only, where the majority of archeological sites in the area are found. Igaliku Sandnes Kangeq Qajaa Total representative area based on the reclassification Air temperature class 8 9 9 6 5128 km 2 Precipitation class 5 3 4 1 7554 km 2 ~4% of the analyzed area (~65% of the analyzed area). ~72% of the analyzed area

Supplementary Table S3: List of samples and the temperatures at which they were incubated for each type of measurement. Site Profile Depth Incubation temperatures ( C) (m) O 2 consumption Heat production CO 2 production Qajaa A1.5.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Qajaa A1.6.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Qajaa A1 1..5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Kangeq Hole 6.25.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Kangeq Hole 6.35.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Kangeq Hole 6.45.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Kangeq Hole 6.55.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Kangeq Hole 6.65.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1.15.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1.3.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1.45.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1.6.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1.75.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1.9.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1 1.5.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1 1.2.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1 1.35.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Sandnes Profile 1 1.5.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Igaliku Profile 1.3.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Igaliku Profile 1.4.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Igaliku Profile 1.6.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Igaliku Profile 2.4.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Igaliku Profile 2.5.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5 Igaliku Profile 2.6.5, 5, 1, 16 16 5

Supplementary Table S4: The Q 1 values obtained from O 2 consumption measurements at.5, 5, 1 and 16 o C. Site Profile Depth (m) Q1 (.5-16 o C) R (n=4) Qajaa A1.5 1.8.98 Qajaa A1.6 2.6 1. Qajaa A1 1. 3.1.99 Kangeq Hole 6.25 3.3.97 Kangeq Hole 6.35 5.1 1. Kangeq Hole 6.45 2.8.97 Kangeq Hole 6.55 5.1.99 Kangeq Hole 6.65 3.1.98 Sandnes Profile 1.15 No result Sandnes Profile 1.3 No result Sandnes Profile 1.45 No result Sandnes Profile 1.6 No result Sandnes Profile 1.75 No result Sandnes Profile 1.9 4.1 1. Sandnes Profile 1 1.5 3.3 1. Sandnes Profile 1 1.2 3.7.99 Sandnes Profile 1 1.35 2.8.99 Sandnes Profile 1 1.5 3..96 Igaliku Profile 1.3 2.2.99 Igaliku Profile 1.4 3..98 Igaliku Profile 1.6 4.3 1. Igaliku Profile 2.4 2.9 1. Igaliku Profile 2.5 3.1 1. Igaliku Profile 2.6 4.1.98