Transit Priority. Peter G Furth

Similar documents
Transit Signal Priority: Help or Hype? Peter G. Furth Northeastern University

Congestion Protection for Transit: Lessons from Europe and Application to MBTA Route 66

Self-Organizing Signals: A Better Framework for Transit Signal Priority

Recommendations from Boston City Council Transportation Policy Briefing Series

MBTA Key Bus Route. Community Meeting Route 66 - Boston

Signal Priority near Major Bus Terminal

MEMORANDUM. TO: Transportation Planning and Programming Committee December 4, 2008 of the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization

Roadways. Roadways III.

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

Transit Signal Preemption and Priority Treatments

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Mathematics of Planet Earth Managing Traffic Flow On Urban Road Networks

Bicycle Facilities Planning

ALTERNATIVE A ONLY. Right Turn Only. BOTH ALTERNATIVES on southbound Mission from 23rd St to 25th St and on northbound Mission from 20th St to 23rd St

MBTA Key Bus Route. Community Meeting Route 1 - Cambridge

MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program. Community Meeting Route 1 - Boston

M14A/D Select Bus Service

MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program. Community Meeting Route 66 - Brookline

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Copenhagen Cycling Map. Red Lines Cycling facilities

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Data Analysis February to March 2018 Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns. SFMTA Board of

WELCOME! To the Centennial Neighbourhoods Secondary Plan and Transportation Management Plan Information Centre. City of Hamilton

Self-Organizing Traffic Signals Using Secondary Extension and Dynamic Coordination Rules

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Transportation Assessment

7 Yonge and Steeles Area Regional Transportation Study City of Markham and City of Vaughan

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

September 20, 2016 L Taraval Rapid Project SFMTA Board of Directors Meeting

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Aurora Corridor to E Line

INTRODUCTION TO SIGNAL TIMING & TRAFFIC CONTROL

Actuated Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

McGrath Boulevard Project Development Public Meeting #2 May 28 th, 2015 East Somerville Community School

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Transit Signal Priority Demonstration Project Fargo-Moorhead Metro Area Transit

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

Demonstration of Possibilities to Introduce Semi-actuated Traffic Control System at Dhanmondi Satmasjid Road by Using CORSIM Simulation Software

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

How to achieve fluid traffic

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Queue Jump Lane, Transit Signal Priority, and Stop Location: Evaluation of Transit Preferential Treatments using Microsimulation

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

Vision Zero Task Force June 28, 2017 COUNTERMEASURE PAIRING

ADVANCED TRANSIT OPERATIONS AND MODELING

Better Market Street Project. Project Update January 15, 2015

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

Freeway System Considerations

Simulation Analysis of Intersection Treatments for Cycle Tracks

MEMORANDUM. The primary tasks documented in this memorandum are:

MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT APRIL 25, 2018

Project Goals Project Limits Boston Bikes Data Existing Conditions Proposed Options Discussion

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

North Avenue Corridor Study

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Traffic Signal Design

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

Complete Streets: Policy Framework Complete Streets: Implementation Plans A more Complete Street: Laurier Bike Lane Pilot Project

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

Some interesting questions of traffic signal control

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

WHAT IS BRT? Jack M. Gonsalves, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. February 22, 2012

2017 Florida Commuter Transportation Summit

TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY The Toronto Experience

Understanding Our Options, Lessons and Potential of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Graham Carey P.E., AICP November 2, 2011

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

CITY OF HAMILTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Transportation Planning and Parking Division

Green mobility and traffic safety in Copenhagen

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Short-Term Enhancements Improvements to keep Austin moving. MetroRapid

Bike Planning: A New Day

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Uniting Cleveland through the Euclid Corridor Transportation Project

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

KEARNY MESA COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE

Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Traffic Control System for Heterogeneous flow conditions

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Transportation, Parking & Roads

INFRASTRUCTURE: Using the Grid to Create a more Self-Sustaining Downtown. Studio Spring 2013

Bike Routes Assessment: 95 Ave, 106 St & 40 Ave. Replace with appropriate image in View > Master.

Alternatives Public Workshop

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Transcription:

Transit Priority Peter G Furth Fourth in a series of Policy Briefings to Boston City Council s Committee on Parks, Recreation, & Transportation Feb 2, 2017

What Does Transit Priority Look Like? Zurich The Hague Portland Salt Lake City Boston Near zero traffic delay, impeccable punctuality for trams Bus lane, tram reservations, priority at all traffic lights Green wave for light rail station-to-station; priority for buses as well Priority for light rail at all traffic lights All (i.e., underground) or Nothing, mostly 2

Why Transit Priority Makes Sense 1. Transit use benefits society in terms of Air quality, climate impact, sustainability Vibrant, livable communities What is our future? 2. Priority determines whether people are switching to transit or from transit Priority breaks the vicious cycle 3

Some More Reasons 3. We re serving people, not vehicles On Huntington Ave @ Parker Hill, only 2% of the vehicles are buses and trolleys, but they carry 50% of the people. 4. Cars can reroute; transit can t So giving preference to transit on selected streets won t hurt cars as much as you might think 5. All or Nothing doesn t make sense 4

Grading our Traffic System: How Much Does Traffic Congestion Harm Transit? Route Passengers (Million/y) Impact to MBTA Operations running time impact ($M/y) recovery time impact ($M/y) Impact to Riders riding time impact ($M/y) wait + buffer impact ($M/y) Total ($M/y) Cost per passenger 1 4.1 0.80 0.41 2.3 3.8 7.3 $ 1.79 9 1.9 0.36 0.27 0.6 1.1 2.3 $ 1.26 28 4.4 0.79 0.30 2.4 4.3 7.7 $ 1.78 9 Routes 25.9 5.91 2.20 15.0 22.3 $45.4 $ 1.76 Conclusion: The grade is F. 5

Why Is This Allowed To Happen? Silver Line Waterfront at D Street Roxbury Crossing Huntington Ave., Mission Hill Buses with 60 people wait for up to 60 seconds, sometimes with only 4 or 5 cars going by. Buses wait for 3 minutes or more to turn left because the left turn green time is too short to clear the queue Green Line & buses move at walking speed, even though they re 70% of the road users. 6

Anti-Priority on Beacon St, Brookline How could this happen? How could it take more than a year to fix this? Cars have green while Green Line is held (white bar is horizontal) 15 seconds later, Green Line finally gets green (white bar is vertical) 7

Mechanisms / Incentives MBTA: Measure, advocate, be creative Brussels example State: Give incentives for transit priority City: Make serving transit well an institutional priority Objectives, measurement, resources, rewards Staffing, interns 8

Low-Tech Priority Signal timing to favor bus flows Especially at left turns, busway intersections, and near terminals Longer maximum green They only use what they need, so it hardly hurts other traffic Reservice Two bus phases per cycle Reserve only when a bus is waiting Coordinate signals for bus movements E.g., Silver Line at Temple & Tremont; Ruggles Station 9

Low-Tech Priority (cont d) Peak period parking restriction / bus lanes Everett is doing it on Main Street Bus stop improvements Far side instead of near-side Bus bulb-outs with in-line stops Consolidate stops 10

If you care, you can find a solution Silver Line approaching Dudley Square 4.4 mph, 2 to 4 minutes delay Bottleneck at downstream signal (Washington & Dudley) Retiming signal: Save 2 minutes for bus, no impact on cars Ruggles Station (96 buses/h, 4 signals) 80 s average delay Reduce to 40 s with simple timing changes Reduce to 20 s with smart priority measures D Street for Silver Line Waterfront If all else fails, post a police officer! 11

How Does Signal Priority Work? Check-in detector (can be virtual) Early enough to allow time to respond Late enough to estimate bus arrival time Checkout detector to cancel request Avoid wasted green Performance measurement If light is green, tell it to stay green ( green extension ) Big benefit, but to few buses 12

Good Performance Isn t Automatic Silver Line, Washington Street experience Minor intersections with priority almost no benefit Major intersections: Priority is suspended Potential on Tremont St (Temple, West, Avery) Requires smart detection and response Off-the-shelf priority measures are often weak Often 2-3 s per intersection benefit Good performance requires careful thinking, refining (e.g., Zurich) 13

Sometimes Buses Need Priority is Space as well as in Time Huntington Option A: No change in curbs, no bike accommodation Avenue, Mission Hill Section Option B: Shift curbs and provide cycle tracks as well

Traffic Delay Impacts, with 20% of Through Traffic Diverted (minutes) Outbound Inbound Bus Train Car Bus Train Car Existing 6.3 7.7 7.0 1.2 2.2 1.4 New 1.5 1.8 2.1 0.5 1.0 1.2 Peak direction buses & trains save 4 to 6 minutes!

Priority-Friendly Traffic Signals Standard signal mode in Boston, coordinatedactuated, is transit-unfriendly Long cycles (meaning long red periods) Inflexible No possibility of compensation, a prerequisite for aggressive priority Less emphasis on arterial coordination, more on short cycles 16

Smart & Flexible Signals Self-organizing signals coordination is organic, not fixed, and is self-healing, allowing transit interruptions Simulation tests on Beacon Street, Brookline Average Network Delay (s/vehicle) Coordinated - Self-Organizing Actuated No TSP TSP No TSP TSP 68.4 74.0 58.6 67.1 Train Delay per intersection (s) 20.2 13.7 21.2 7.1 17

Simulation Test on an Arterial in Phoenix Average Intersection Delay (s), Auto and Bus Coordinated-Actuated, no TSP Coordinated-Actuated + TSP Self-Organizing, no TSP auto bus Self-Organizing + TSP Self-Org, Predictive- Tentative TSP 0 10 20 30 18

Taking responsibility Conclusions Goals, performance measures, rewards Mechanisms, incentives Staffing Technology We can do a lot low-tech With clever solutions, we can do even more with our existing signals Work toward having smart, flexible signal control 19