TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.0 THOROUGHFARE PLAN. Analysis of Future Conditions Thoroughfare Plan Proposed Cross-Sections.. 7.

Similar documents
AGENDA TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 2018 FLOWER MOUND TOWN HALL 2121 CROSS TIMBERS ROAD FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS

Town of Flower Mound Master Transportation Plan Update

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

NEW BRAUNFELS SEGUIN AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DRAFT PLAN NEW BRAUNFELS CITY COUNCIL MEETING

FM 1092/Murphy Road Access Management Study Pulic Meeting #1. Wednesday, August 31, :00 p.m. 8:00 p.m.

Classification Criteria

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

3.0 Future Conditions

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Application of a Complete Street

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

HILLSIDE DISTRICT PLAN White Paper

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

Driveway Design Criteria

APPENDIX D COST SUMMARY TABLES

CITY OF LUCAS 2014 MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

This page intentionally left blank.

Implementation challenge 2: Is there room for Complete Streets? Does street classification enable Complete Streets?

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

WELCOME Public Information Centre

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Downey Road. Transportation Improvement Study

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Modal Interrelationships: A bicycle lane is proposed between Harrington Ave and Swanns Station Rd.

The procedures to be followed in undertaking Non-Emergency work depend on the degree of traffic disruption caused by the work.

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

GENERAL DESCRIPTION. Page 1 of 5

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

Southbend to Prima Vista. October 30, Floresta Corridor Master Plan

Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Roadway Design Manual

A Vision for Athens: Transportation Plan. By Mac Martin, AICP City Planner

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Roadway Classification Review

Lee s Summit, Missouri Thoroughfare Master Plan

Access Management Regulations and Standards

STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

LARIMER COUNTY: ENGINEERING DOUGLAS ROAD (CR 54)

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

ACCESS MANAGEMENT STANDARDS FOR COUNTY ROADS ON THE THOROUGHFARE RIGHT OF WAY IDENTIFICATION MAP

Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Transportation Analysis and Plan

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Innovative Intersections

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN

Small Area Study U.S. Route 220 and VA Route 615 Intersection. Bath County, Virginia

Bridges and Arizona Crossings

In Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

Mobility STRATEGY. Overview. Intended Outcomes. Chapter Four - Mobility

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.0 THOROUGHFARE PLAN Analysis of Future Conditions.. 7.2 Thoroughfare Plan.. 7.3 Proposed Cross-Sections.. 7.4 Arterials Minor Arterials Collectors Local Streets Thoroughfare Plan Map (05-04-15). Appendix

Analysis of Future Conditions Future conditions of the Town of Flower Mound thoroughfare system were analyzed using 20-year land use assumptions supplied to us by the North Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). These land use projections for population, households, and employment were used in the NCTCOG computerized travel demand model to estimate future traffic volumes on the roadway system within and adjacent to Flower Mound. In addition, existing traffic counts were collected by the Town of Flower Mound and used by Kimley-Horn to validate the results of the NCTCOG travel model. The land use plan for the western region of Town was updated in 2008. Future thoroughfares in that region are addressed in this plan based on the Area Plan. The Town s adoption of the land use plan incorporates the Town s SMARTGrowth initiative. This plan is not part of the NCTCOG s 2020 travel model. It is important to note that some manual adjustments had to be made to the traffic assignment to adjust for the Town s land use plan, based on traditional transportation distribution and assignment techniques. An analysis of the results of the travel demand modeling effort yielded several findings and implications: 1. The roadways projected to carry the most traffic within Flower Mound are FM 1171, FM 3040, Morriss Road, FM 2499, Gerault Road, and US 377. Defined as Major Arterials, these roadways should be planned to carry significant traffic in the year 2020, and efforts to coordinate with TxDOT to obtain funding and construct improvements continue. 2. The major roadways that connect to the TxDOT regional freeway system likely will be congested at interchanges and major intersections. These roadways are FM 1171, FM 3040, FM 407, FM 2499 and US 377. Alternate routes to connect with the freeway system are needed, and this effort will involve coordination with adjoining cities. The primary candidates for these alternative routes are Lakeside Parkway to SH 121 in Grapevine, an extension of Spinks Road to Valley Parkway in Lewisville, and an extension of Kirkpatrick Lane to Bellaire Boulevard in Lewisville. 3. The thoroughfare alignment of the Flower Mound Road extension west of Bruton-Orand is a four-lane urban minor arterial all the way to FM 1171. Due to the nature of this facility, a six-lane major arterial is not recommended. 4. In general, the Flower Mound roadways classified as collectors do not carry volumes that warrant four lanes. It appears that high-quality two-lane roads with provisions for turning traffic and shoulders are a viable alternative. 5. The volumes projected on Bruton-Orand do not indicate need for a six-lane arterial. A minor arterial, which would connect adjacent land uses and the major roadways, appears appropriate for Bruton- Orand. 6. The projected volumes of over 25,000 vehicles per day on Morriss indicate the need to widen that roadway to a six-lane arterial section. Gerault Road has been improved to a six-lane section to provide a direct connection from Morriss to SH 121. 7. Generally, the system of planned arterials appears capable of handling the traffic demand within Flower Mound. The arterial system should be planned and depended on to carry traffic to, through, and from the Town of Flower Mound. The collector system should be configured to provide access to, not through, adjacent land uses. This suggests that collectors generally should not be continuous for long distances and should not encourage through-traffic in residential neighborhoods. To discourage traffic through neighborhoods, it is essential that adequate capacity and acceptable operating conditions be maintained on the major roadway system. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.2

Thoroughfare Plan The recommended thoroughfare plan for Flower Mound is based on information obtained at public hearings and the analysis of existing and projected conditions. The major features of this plan are as follows: 1. Lakeside Parkway Connection to SH 121 - A direct connection to SH 121 provides another access to the center of Flower Mound and relieves FM 2499. 2. Flower Mound Road - Flower Mound Road has been improved and connects with FM 1171 as a four-lane Minor Arterial roadway with median, curb, and gutter. 3. Kirkpatrick Extension - The alignment of this roadway should be extended to provide a connection to Bellaire Boulevard in Lewisville. 4. Collector Street Cross Sections - Two cross-sections have been developed to reflect the Town s characteristics and collector street needs. Urban collectors have a 36-foot wide pavement with curb and gutter. Rural collectors have two 12-foot travel lanes but no curb or gutter; however, full-width shoulders could provide for bicycle travel and left-turn bypass lanes. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.3

Proposed Cross-Sections Cross-sections describe the basic attributes of roadways: lanes, sidewalks, drainage and pavement, medians, parkway, and right-of-way (ROW). All dimensions other than lane widths presented in the accompanying cross-sections are minimums. Based on the travel needs and community goals for appearance and character, several typical roadway cross-sections have been developed to specify the basic ROW dedication needs and design criteria. Note that all urban sections shall have a minimum offset of four feet from the back of curb to the sidewalk and a one foot minimum from the ROW line to the back of the sidewalk. Two basic categories, arterials and collectors, contain several variations to meet differing travel needs. Arterials Two different arterial classes were identified for use in Flower Mound: Major Arterials and Minor Arterials. Major Arterial Major Arterials carry traffic long distances and connect the Town to the regional freeway system and other major regional activity centers. These facility types serve Flower Mound traffic and traffic traveling through Flower Mound. They are the most heavily traveled roadways and require some degree of access control. Access standards for Major Arterials, which are more stringent than those applied to Minor Arterials, should address driveways, median-openings, and deceleration lanes. Major (Principal) Arterial The proposed Major Arterial cross-section shown below consists of a six-lane roadway with 12' lanes, an 18' median, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks within 120' of ROW. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.4

Greenway Urban Arterial The next Major Arterial is called a Greenway Urban Arterial. It is designed to provide for a large (42') landscaped median and 120' of ROW. This typical section allows the Town the flexibility to widen to six lanes, if needed, without taking additional ROW. 4-lane divided with extra-wide greenway median and 120 right-of-way. Greenway Rural Arterial The third and final Major Arterial is called a Greenway Rural Arterial. For this typical section, the raised curb and gutter median is replaced with a grassy swale in the median that drains into an underground system. Two 11' travel lanes are provided in each direction. The minimum ROW is 120'. This facility type reflects the desire to maintain a rural character in the western portion of the Town. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.5

Minor Arterial Two different cross-sections for Minor Arterials were developed to maintain the rural character of the western portion of Flower Mound. These facility types serve traffic originating in or destined for locations within Flower Mound, and they are not intended to serve traffic traveling through the Town. Urban and rural cross-sections, which can be distinguished by their differing approaches to roadway drainage, are recommended. Also, a suburban typical has been developed for those facilities that want a rural feel; it features shoulders, open swale ditches, and a raised, landscaped median with curb and gutter. Urban Minor Arterial An Urban Minor Arterial, as shown below, has two 12' travel lanes in each direction separated by a 16' median. The minimum ROW is 90'. 4-lane divided with 90 of right-of-way Urban Minor Arterial Undivided 4-lanes with 70 right-of-way Urban Minor Arterial with On-Street Parking Street, arterial (minor with on-street parking), means an urban minor arterial with on-street parking. Minor arterial streets are designed to serve traffic originating in or destined for locations within town and are intended to be used in Mixed Use type environments. It will have 10 lanes with a 16 foot median and 18 foot angled parking on the outside curb. Curbs would extend to limit parking near intersections to provide better operations and visibility at these locations and reduce pedestrian crossing distance to approximately 56 feet. These sections of roadway will typically have large sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.6

Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.7

Urban Minor with Bike Lane Urban Minor Arterials with Bike Lane serve traffic originating in or destined for locations within Flower Mound and are not intended to serve traffic traveling through the Town. Roadway drainage is provided with curb and gutter. The outside 5 of pavement is to be designated as a 5 marked bike lane for bicycle traffic. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.8

Collectors Collector roadways connect residential and commercial areas to the arterial system and collect and distribute traffic from these areas. They carry less traffic for shorter distances than arterials, and they carry traffic to and from areas rather than through them. The collector cross-sections reflect the desire to maintain a rural character in the western portion of the Town. Each collector cross-section provides one travel lane in each direction. Urban Collector The cross-section below depicts an Urban Collector. A 36' pavement with curb and gutter in a 60' ROW is recommended. 2-lanes 36 wide pavement with 60 of right-of-way Rural Collector The cross-section below shows two 12' travel lanes with 5' shoulders within an 80' ROW. 2-lanes, 2 shoulders 5 width for total 34 wide pavement with 70 of right-of-way. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.9

Local Streets The following are four variations of the Local Street facility type. Local Residential Urban The Local Residential Urban cross-section features 15' travel lanes with curb and gutter all within a 50' ROW. Local Residential Estate The Local Residential Estate cross-section features two 12' lanes within a 24' ROW. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.10

Local Commercial The next local street section depicts a Local Commercial street. A 36' pavement section with curb and gutter in 60' of ROW is recommended. Local Cluster Development Below is a Local Cluster Development Street. This section depicts 24' of pavement and one-foot drop curbs. Town of Flower Mound Master Plan: Ordinance 20-12 7.11

SIMMONS RD DUNCAN LN GARDEN RIDGE BLVD SKILLERN RD OLD SETTLERS RD LONG PRAIRIE RD RIDGECREST DR SCENIC DR SHILOH RD FM 2499 SHILOH RD LUSK LN RIPPY RD KIRKPATRICK LN MORRISS RD CHINN CHAPEL RD BROWNING DR!( IH-35W WAKETON RD FM 407 DIXON LN STONE HILL VALLEY RIDGE BLV KIRKPATRICK LN FARMS PKWY D FM 1171 WAKETON RD!@ US HWY 377!@ FM 1171 RED ROCK LN KINGS RD KINGS RD QUAIL RUN LVD BRIDLEWOOD B BRUTON ORAND BLVD FM 1171 AUBURN DR W WINDSOR DR C H URCHILL DR COLLEGE PKWY TIMBER EATON DR CREEK RD CROS S TIMBERS RD PETERS COLONY RD SAG EBRUSH DR KIRKPATRICK LN FLOWER MOU N D RD DR FIREWHE EL WICHITA TRL FOR EST VISTA DR MCKAMY CREEK RD FM 3040 S TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND THOROUGHFARE PLAN Functional Street Classifications Roundabout!@ Grade Separation!( Diamond Interchange Major Arterial Greenway Urban Arterial ABERDEEN DR LA K E FOREST BLVD SPINKS RD LEXINGTON AVE T RAIT LN GER A ULT RD 0 2,000 4,000 8,000 Scale in Feet May 4, 2015 Greenway Rural Arterial Urban Minor Arterial w/bike Lane Urban Minor Arterial w/on-street Parking Urban Minor Arterial Urban Minor Arterial Undivided Urban Collector. Rural Collector Service Road Denton County Tarrant County LAKESIDE PKWY D SILVERON BLV FM 2499!@ Denton County Dallas County