Chamber in Resolving Disputes between Players and Clubs

Similar documents
The Dispute Resolution System within the framework of FIFA

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Founding and Landmark Cases in the FIFA DRC

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

FIVB TRIBUNAL REGULATIONS

III Jornada: Seminario de Derecho del Fútbol Nacional e Internacional. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHAMBER OF THE PLAYERS STATUS COMMITTEE

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1571 Nusaybindemir SC v. Turkish Football Federation (TFF) & Sirnak SC, award of 15 December 2008

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Single Judge of the Players Status Committee

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) judge

Decision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Financial Dispute Resolution Guide

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Panel: Mr Rui Botica Santos (Portugal), President; Mr Jehangir Baglari (Islamic Republic of Iran); Mr Raymond Hack (South Africa)

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3864 AFC Astra v. Laionel da Silva Ramalho & Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 31 July 2015

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Single Judge of the Players Status Committee

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber. taken in Zurich, Switzerland, on Friday, 11 th March by the following composition:

Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3785 Federación Peruana de Fútbol (FPF) v. Club Budapest Honvéd FC KFT, award of 5 June 2015

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber. passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 22 July 2004, in the following composition: on the claim presented by

EAST VALLEY SENIORS TENNIS LEAGUE BY-LAWS. Revised March 25, 2014 BY-LAWS

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Statutes of The International Football Association Board (The IFAB)

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

III. Player Eligibility Code

Decision of the sub-committee of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC)

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Webster and Matuzalem How they affect CAS jurisprudence

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2628 Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan FC v. Asian Football Confederation (AFC), award of 14 March 2012

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

NATIONAL PLAYER TRANSFER REGULATIONS

DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Arbitration CAS 2006/A/1177 Aston Villa FC v. B.93 Copenhagen, award of 28 May 2007

IRISH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION AMATEUR GAME PLAYER REGISTRATION REGULATIONS SEASON 2018/19

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

A2:1 The Facility Standards are focused on ensuring appropriate standards for the benefit of the Game including:

Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom), Sole Arbitrator

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

By-Laws. Gold Coast Soccer Zone Inc. Page 1 Zone Soccer Inc. Zone By-Laws/v2d/Mar 05

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1677 Alexis Enam v. Club Al Ittihad Tripoli, award of 20 May 2009

SQ BY-LAWS. SQ By-Laws (amended November 2010) 1

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1453 Elkin Soto Jaramillo & FSV Mainz 05 v/ CD Once Caldas & FIFA, preliminary decision of 8 February 2008

FINA RULES ON THE PREVENTION OF THE MANIPULATION OF COMPETITIONS

TENNIS SENIORS AUSTRALIA - SELECTION POLICY

IRISH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION AMATEUR GAME PLAYER REGISTRATION REGULATIONS SEASON 2017/18

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Approved by the CONCACAF Executive Committee on April 7, 2016 ELECTORAL PROCESS GUIDELINES

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1568 M. & Football Club Wil 1900 v. FIFA & Club PFC Naftex AC Bourgas, award of 24 December 2008

ICC REGULATIONS ON SANCTIONING OF EVENTS

Panel: Mr Romano Subiotto QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr Quentin Byrne-Sutton (Switzerland); Mr Vit Horacek (Czech Republic)

SCOTTISH WOMEN S FOOTBALL YOUTH REGIONAL LEAGUES CONSTITUTION

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM. Ski & Snowboard Australia NOMINATION CRITERIA CROSS COUNTRY SKIING

Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom), President; Prof. Petros Mavroidis (Greece); Mr Markus Bösiger (Switzerland)

Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1448 S. & Zamalek SC v. PAOK FC & FIFA, award of 25 June 2008

a Player is transferring from another Union. For Players at Level 4 and above, evidence of international Clearance must be provided.

Arbitration CAS 2001/A/324 Addo & van Nistelrooij / Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), order of 15 March 2001

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM. Ski & Snowboard Australia NOMINATION CRITERIA SNOWBOARD CROSS

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE INTERNATIONAL SPORTS FEDERATIONS REQUESTING IOC RECOGNITION. Recognition Procedure

T RIPPON MID-ESSEX CRICKET LEAGUE

Bendigo Amateur Soccer League Inc.

Arbitration CAS 2013/A/3090 Bulgarian Football Union (BFU) v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 27 June 2013

Philippines Football League

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

Arbitration CAS 2009/A/2011 Stephan Schumacher v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award on costs of 6 May 2010

I N T E R N A T I O N A L S K A T I N G U N I O N

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. between THE UNION OF EUROPEAN FOOTBALL ASSOCIATIONS. (hereinafter referred to as UEFA ) and

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

AFL VICTORIA COMMUNITY LEAGUE AFFILIATE REGULATIONS

CODE OF CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM. Luge Australia Incorporated. NOMINATION CRITERIA Luge

Representation Contract

CRICKET DISCIPLINE COMMISSION REGULATIONS

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/010 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Gabriel Sincraian, award of 8 December 2016

Champions Cup REGULATIONS

CLUB LICENSING MANUAL

Arbitration CAS 2006/A/1110 PAOK FC v. Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), award of 25 August 2006 (operative part of 13 July 2006)

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM

RULES PREAMBLE. In these Rules, the following words and expressions have the following meanings:- a written notice stating the nature of the matter

England and Wales Cricket Board MODEL DISCIPLINE REGULATIONS

REGULATIONS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE NATIONAL LEAGUE SYSTEM

Player Name:... Address: Street Address:... Suburb:... State:... Postcode:... Contact Details: Home Phone:... Mobile:... Address:...

Transcription:

The Role of the Dispute Resolution Chamber in Resolving Disputes between Players and Clubs What is the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC)? an independent arbitration tribunal set up by FIFA (private legal person) to settle private legal disputes with statutory authorisation Statutory provisions for the DRC: art. 49 par. 2 of the FIFA Statutes, referring to 1. The Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, and 2. The Rules Governing the Procedures of the Players Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber (Procedural Rules) 1

Jurisdiction of FIFA s Dispute Resolution Chamber Employment-related disputes (maintenance of contractual stability) between a club and a player with an international dimension art. 24 and art. 22 lit. b) of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players unless an independent arbitration tribunal guaranteeing fair proceedings and respecting the principle of equal representation of players and clubs has been established at national level within the framework of the association and/or a collective bargaining agreement Jurisdiction of FIFA s Dispute Resolution Chamber Disputes between clubs and players in relation to the maintenance of contractual stability where there has been a request for an International Transfer Certificate (ITC) art. 24 and art. 22 lit. a) of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players international transfer at the basis of the dispute gives the matter the needed international dimension 2

Advantages of the DRC over ordinary courts: Faster proceedings DRC reacts and rules more quickly and with greater flexibility than ordinary courts of law Less expensive DRC proceedings relating to labour disputes are free of charge Behind closed doors the general public and the media are, in general, excluded More efficient proceedings DRC is more familiar with the subject matter than ordinary courts of law, takes into account the special nature of football (litigations judged by specialists The Football Family) Advantages of the DRC over ordinary courts: Constitutional principles DRC applies general and constitution principles recognised all over the world (particular importance in international arbitration) Security of the law DRC to guarantee fair proceedings and establish a specialised firm jurisprudence Enforceability decisions that are not respected may be enforced by initiating disciplinary proceedings 3

Specificities of the DRC: 24 members 12 player and 12 club representatives equal representation appointed by the FIFA Executive Committee formation to regard the territory of all six confederations independent chairman (Mr. Slim Aloulou) chosen by the FIFA Executive Committee on proposal of players representatives and leagues Specificities of the DRC: members sitting following a rotation system DRC adjudicates in the presence of at least three members (including the Chairman) (art. 24 par. 2 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players) normally, formation of 5 members (including the Chairman) all members have one vote in case of a tie: the Chairman has casting vote (art. 14 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules) 4

Central procedural aspects: The DRC examines ex-officio whether it has jurisdiction Applicable material law (art. 2 of the Procedural Rules) FIFA regulations whilst taking into account all relevant arrangements, laws and/or collective bargaining agreements that exist at national level, as well as the specificity of sport General rule: proceedings to be conducted in writing only Central procedural aspects: Petitions shall be submitted in accordance with art. 9 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules incomplete petitions: deadline to the party to amend them accordingly, otherwise petition will not be considered responsibility of the parties to provide the DRC with the evidence they deem appropriate to support their position all documentation to be submitted in one of four official FIFA languages normally, one exchange of correspondence and then submission to deciding body missing position from the respondent party: decision to be taken on the basis of the documents on file 5

Central procedural aspects: DRC at liberty to also consider evidence not presented by parties Evidence considered with free discretion by the DRC Decisions are communicated in writing Decisions without grounds (art. 15 of the Procedural Rules) the DRC may decide to communicate findings of a decision only not applicable to decisions that lead to sporting sanctions the parties have 10 days to request the grounds of the decision if motivated decision requested: time limit to lodge an appeal begins upon receipt of the motivated decision if no motivated decision requested or request made late: decision will come into force Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS): Any decision passed by the DRC is subject to an appeal at CAS (art. 63 of the FIFA Statutes) Appeals with CAS to be lodged within 21 days of notification of the decision Reminder: if motivated decision requested, the time limit to lodge an appeal begins upon receipt of the motivated decision 6

Final remarks inside the football structure has achieved a high grade of recognition, credibility and acceptance. Thank you for your attention 7