UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Defendant.

Similar documents
Case 8:15-cv SCB-TBM Document 79 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID 485 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

TRIAL COURT BAILLIFF S STUDY GUIDE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

ROUND 1: 'American Sniper' Exposes Unresolved Issues About The Iraq War

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

120 December 29, 2016 No. 654 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Case 2:17-cv DB Document 31 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 7

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA. Case No.

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:13-cv JEB Document 20 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DISTRICT

Case: 3:14-cv DAK Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/14/14 1 of 13. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. KAYAK Software Corporation, by its attorneys, Foley & Lardner LLP, for its Complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. PARTIES

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012

Banksia Securities Limited ACN: (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation) ("BSL")

the Central Intelligence Agency s Motion for Summary Judgment.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

DEADLINE.com mew Doc 959 Filed 11/10/15 Entered 11/10/15 22:06:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 5. November 10, 2015

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Case 9:11-cv DWM Document 64 Filed 06/21/11 Page 1 of 7

COURTS, HARLEY. index Number : /2004. Cross-Motion: '1 Yes n No SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY PART PRESENT:

DC CAUSE NO.

Ms. Carragher breached their contract to relocate him in rental property or were

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 1:17-cv PAE Document 29 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:13-cv KES Document 1 Filed 05/10/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Best Hole in One Club Member ( Rules and Regulations )

U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:93-cv JEC

v. CASE NO. 2:12-CV-103-J

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO. DIXON INDUSTRIES, ET AL. : (Civil Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Defendants-Appellees :

2 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 5 Q. Would you please state your name for the. 8 Q. All right. Officer Carreon, I would like to

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 18. United States District Court District of Columbia

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Hammer-Schlagen Stump Registers As Trademark

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G JAMES MCCRAY, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED AUGUST 3, 2012

EEA AGREEMENT - PROTOCOL 24 p. 1 PROTOCOL 24 { 1 } ON COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CONTROL OF CONCENTRATIONS GENERAL PRINCIPLES.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SPOKANE

Case 1:14-cv SOM-BMK Document 98 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 2185

smb Doc 217 Filed 01/08/19 Entered 01/08/19 11:54:14 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

Filing Fee: $88.00 Category: A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY WARREN CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. LAVONDA JOHNSON, GREG JOHNSON AND JALYN SAVAGE

Case 2:17-cv DB Document 191 Filed 09/22/17 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Montgomery County Common Pleas Court

Case 2:15-cv JLQ Document Filed 06/26/17. Exhibit 5

Dep t of Correction v. White OATH Index No. 1461/09 (Apr. 27, 2009)

Case 1:14-cv REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 10/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 52-7 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 7. Exhibit 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND NOTICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

PAUL F. SANCHEZ, III CANDIA WOODS GOLF LINKS. Argued: September 15, 2010 Opinion Issued: November 24, 2010

ADDITIONAL FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE

NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:06-cv-201-RJC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Mamati v City of New York Parks & Recreation 2013 NY Slip Op 33830(U) September 9, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 13927/11 Judge:

Case 2:15-cv NBF Document 29 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } Decision and Order

(OAL Decision: V. : COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION

Case 1:18-cv UA Document 1 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Introduction to Intellectual Property Law & Policy Law 507 Spring Term Professor Wagner

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. v. Hon. Robert L. Ziolkowski. Margaret A. Costello (P41868) James E.

Arbitration CAS 2009/A/2011 Stephan Schumacher v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award on costs of 6 May 2010

Case 2:13-cv RJS-EJF Document 2 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 21

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

The government moves for reconsideration of part of my Opinion and Order of September

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D17-470

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 4:11-cr JST USA v. Su. Document 111. View Document.

)(

Levine v USA Cycling, Inc NY Slip Op 33177(U) December 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Bernard J.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

6 vs. AT LAW NO. CL Conference Room, 12 N & W Pocahontas DiviBion Building, Princeton Avenue, Bluefield, West Virginia

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/12/15 Page 1 of 12

BOARD OF ALDERMEN AGENDA

Coaches Beware of Participating With Players in Practice

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber. taken in Zurich, Switzerland, on Friday, 11 th March by the following composition:

Case 1:03-cv EGS Document Filed 03/20/09 Page 1 of 12

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

The following words and terms, when used in this rule, have the following meanings, unless the context clearly

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Sydney) 00/015 Mihaela Melinte / International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF), award of 29 September 2000

Opposers S. Cade Huffaker and Bradley H. Huffaker, by and through their. undersigned attorney, submit this Notice of Appeal pursuant to C.A.R.

PlainSite. Legal Document. Washington Western District Court Case No. 2:11-cv Crossfit Inc. v. Moore et al. Document 1.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Table of Contents REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION UPON FURTHER SUBDIVISION. Exhibit A. - 11/7/2000 Resolution of Assignment...

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) Ci"f,t. Action No. (RHO) v. Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Rebecca Willis, et al. v. Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 40, et al. Appellate Court Case No. Superior Court No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Decision of the Single Judge of the Players Status Committee

Transcription:

CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 391 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jesse Ventura a/k/a James G. Janos, v. Plaintiff, Civ. No. 12-472 (RHK/JJK) ORDER Taya Kyle, as Executor of the Estate of Chris Kyle, Defendant. Presently before the Court is the disposition of Plaintiff Jesse Ventura s unjustenrichment claim following trial. The Court submitted the unjust-enrichment claim to the jury in an advisory capacity and, concluding that the jury s verdict in favor of Ventura and its award of $1,345,477.25 are reasonable and supported by a preponderance of the evidence, the Court will adopt the jury s verdict as its own. 1 Trial in this matter commenced July 8, 2014, and the jury returned a verdict July 29, 2014. Over the course of the trial, the Court received substantial evidence related to Ventura s unjust-enrichment claim, as well as his defamation and appropriation claims. Most notably, Taya Kyle, Peter Hubbard, and Sharon Rosenblum all testified regarding the promotion of American Sniper, media interest in Chris Kyle s story about Ventura, 1 The Court indicated at the close of trial, upon request of defense counsel, that it might hear from the parties again before disposing of the unjust-enrichment claim. However, upon reviewing the trial transcripts, as well as the parties briefing on Defendant s two Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, the Court concluded further argument on the matter was unnecessary and would only serve to delay the entry of judgment.

CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 391 Filed 08/07/14 Page 2 of 6 sales of American Sniper, revenues and royalties, and the development of a motion picture adaptation. Their testimony, together with the exhibits, revealed the following: American Sniper went on sale Tuesday, January 3, 2012. (Trial Tr. at 1824.) Before it went on sale, there had been approximately 3,400 preorders of the book, which the publishers considered tremendous. (Id. at 1819; Def. Ex. 264.) HarperCollins had not expected the book to be a best seller because Kyle was an unknown author. (Trial Tr. at 1819.) Chris Kyle was scheduled to do a publicity tour for the book beginning January 3. On Wednesday, January 4, he appeared on the Opie & Anthony radio show. About twenty minutes into the show, a listener called in and asked about whether Kyle had punched Ventura. (Pl. Ex. 100.) Opie and Anthony responded with enthusiasm and Kyle s publicist, Sharon Rosenblum, agreed the show got lively at that point. (Trial Tr. at 1826.) She was pleased with Kyle s performance and considered it a hit interview. (Id. at 1828.) The next day, January 5, the book rose to number 21 on Amazon s best-seller list. (Id. at 1829.) The editor, Peter Hubbard, emailed Rosenblum and others a link to a Fox News story captioned Navy Seal Punched Out Jesse Ventura, remarking it was priceless. (Id. at 1829; Pl. Ex. 102.) Rosenblum responded that Kyle had been invited to appear on Fox and Friends again to tell this story and called it hot hot hot. (Trial Tr. at 1830; Pl. Ex. 102.) That evening, Kyle s interview on The O Reilly Factor aired, which both Rosenblum and Hubbard testified was an important interview. After introducing Chris Kyle and his book, O Reilly s first question to Kyle was about getting in a fight with Ventura. (Trial Tr. at 1832; Pl. Ex. 103.) In other words, O Reilly chose - 2 -

CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 391 Filed 08/07/14 Page 3 of 6 to lead with the Ventura story not Kyle s record number of kills or his fatal 2,100 yard shot. On Friday, January 6, the day after the O Reilly interview aired, sales rocketed and American Sniper went from number 21 to number 2 on Amazon s best-seller list. (Trial Tr. at 1834.) The CEO of HarperCollins sent an email that day scheduling a reprint of 100,000 copies of American Sniper. (Id. at 1836 37; Pl. Ex. 315.) Hubbard responded, Holy shit. (Trial Tr. at 1837; Pl. Ex. 315.) Rosenblum sent out a News Flash on American Sniper to the HarperCollins sales team for distribution to their accounts, which linked to a Fox News story about the Ventura story and to a clip of the Opie & Anthony show in which Kyle discussed Ventura. (Trial Tr. at 1840; Pl. Ex. 295.) By the weekend, the book was the number 1 seller on Amazon and Barnes & Noble. (Trial Tr. at 1834.) The head of sales sent an email with the subject line Number 1 both Amazon & bn.com that said Thank you Mr. O Reilly. (Id. at 1835; Pl. Ex. 104.) Kyle was invited back onto the Opie & Anthony Show on January 10 to discuss the Ventura story further. (Trial Tr. at 1849 50; Pl. Ex. 113.) By January 11, Rosenblum described the sales of American Sniper as astonishing. (Trial Tr. at 1855.) By January 22, the book was number 1 on the New York Times best-seller list, where it remained for many weeks. (Pl. Ex. 126) In June 2012, the film rights were optioned by Warner Brothers, which has since filmed a movie based on the book, directed by Clint Eastwood and starring Bradley Cooper. (Trial Tr. at 99 100; Pl. Exs. 130, 134.) At trial, Hubbard estimated American Sniper had sold 1.5 million copies to date. (Trial Tr. at 1881.) At $26.99 per book, Ventura s counsel estimated in closing argument - 3 -

CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 391 Filed 08/07/14 Page 4 of 6 that HarperCollins had made approximately $40 million off American Sniper sales. (Id. at 2038.) Kyle was entitled to 15% of the revenue (after the first $10,000) (Pl. Ex. 82), which would equal over $6 million in royalties to Kyle and his Estate to date (Trial Tr. at 2038). In addition, Kyle received more than $500,000 from the Warner Brothers contract to date. (Pl. Exs. 134, 135, 355, 356.) After two weeks of evidence and more than five full days of deliberations, the jury returned a divided verdict (with the parties agreement, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 48(b)) of eight to two in favor of Ventura on defamation and unjust enrichment and in favor of Kyle on appropriation. The jury awarded Ventura $500,000 for defamation and $1,345,477.25 for unjust enrichment. Given how much media attention the Ventura story garnered and how book sales sky-rocketed after select media appearances in which Kyle recounted and discussed the Ventura story, the jury s conclusion that Kyle was unjustly enriched by his story about Ventura was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Likewise, its award of $1,345,477.25 was a reasonable portion (approximately 25%) of Chris Kyle s and his Estate s total profits to date and was supported by substantial evidence. CONCLUSION This case was tried to a jury and the Court from July 8, 2014, to July 22, 2014. On July 29, 2014, upon agreement by the parties, the jury returned a divided verdict of eight to two as follows: 1. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of defamation against Chris Kyle? (See Jury Instruction Nos. 8, 8A, 8B, 8C.) X YES NO - 4 -

CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 391 Filed 08/07/14 Page 5 of 6 2. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate Plaintiff Jesse Ventura for damages directly caused by the defamation? (See Jury Instruction Nos. 12 and 13 for the means of determining damages.) $ 500,000.00 3. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of appropriation against Chris Kyle? (See Jury Instruction No. 9.) YES X NO 4. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate Plaintiff Jesse Ventura for damages directly caused by the appropriation? (See Jury Instruction No. 13 for the means of determining damages.) $ 5. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of unjust enrichment against Chris Kyle and the Defendant Estate? (See Jury Instruction No. 10.) X YES NO 6. By what amount of money, if any, has the Defendant Estate been unjustly enriched? (See Jury Instruction No. 13 for the means of determining damages.) $ 1,345,477.25 * * * Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the jury s verdicts are ADOPTED by the Court as its own. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(b), that Plaintiff Jesse - 5 -

CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 391 Filed 08/07/14 Page 6 of 6 Ventura recover of Defendant Taya Kyle, as the Executor of the Estate of Chris Kyle, the sum of $1,845,477.25 comprising $500,000.00 in defamation damages and $1,345,477.25 in unjust enrichment. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: August 7, 2014 s/richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge - 6 -