Virginia Offshore Wind Advanced Technology Demonstration Program and Test Pad Sites

Similar documents
OFFSHORE WIND: A CRASH COURSE

V MW Offshore leadership

RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION FROM WIND AND WAVES TO LOADS ON OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES

Wind Energy 101 for Southeastern Policy Makers Overview of Wind Energy Development and Potential in the US

Offshore Wind Vessels. Steven Kopits Douglas-Westwood LLC

That is why. April 24, 2008

Minimal Structures for Marginal Nova Scotia Developments

Offshore Wind Energy Potential for the United States

Offshore Service Vessels for Wind Farming. BALTEXPO 2011, September 2011

A2SEA corporate presentation. Søren Rønnow Poulsen Key Account Manager, Scandinacia & Baltic

Burbo Bank Extension Offshore Wind Farm

Pile Gripper Systems

Dynamic analysis of offshore floating wind turbines

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT MOORING SYSTEMS ON HYDRODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF AN OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE

Experience with the design, manufacture, test and commercialisation of the REpower 6M turbine

Offshore wind power in the Baltic sea

The WindFloat Project. Hamburg, September 2016

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BARGE FLOATER WITH MOONPOOL FOR 5 MW WIND TURBINE

Norway s solution: Hywind- world s first full scale floating turbine Dr. Nenad Keseric Asset Manager/Specialist Statoil ASA MPR RE Operations

Computationally Efficient Determination of Long Term Extreme Out-of-Plane Loads for Offshore Turbines

Innovative and Robust Design. With Full Extension of Offshore Engineering and Design Experiences.

Wind Turbine Shuttle. Ferdinand van Heerd

INDO-FRENCH TECHNOLOGY MEET. Round Table MARINE TECHNOLOGIES

REMOTE SENSING APPLICATION in WIND ENERGY

Taking Stock: Building an Offshore Wind Research Agenda for the U.S. Industry

Technology and innovation challenges for UK Offshore Wind Energy Andrew Scott

Ameliorating the Negative Damping in the Dynamic Responses of a Tension Leg Spar-Type Support Structure with a Downwind Turbine

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

SeaSmart. Jonathan Evans

WIND TURBINE SHUTTLE HUISMAN PRODUCT BROCHURE

Figure 1, Chart showing the location of the Breach at Old Inlet and sensors deployed in Great South Bay.

V MW. Exceptional performance and reliability at high-wind-speed sites. vestas.com

National Maritime Center

OFFSHORE WIND ACCELERATOR (OWA) Access Competition. Competition Overview and Technical Specification

Alstom Ocean Energy Path towards Industrailsation. Ken Street 18 th April 2013

Japan s Floating Offshore Wind Projects

Wind Project Siting and Permitting Blaine Loos

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE

Ocean Waves and Surf Forecasting: Wave Climate and Forecasting

LECTURE 18 WIND POWER SYSTEMS. ECE 371 Sustainable Energy Systems

Mid-Atlantic Coastal Bays and Sounds -- an Overlooked Opportunity?

Well, Well, Well. BACKGROUND Seasonal upwelling is a very important process in the coastal ocean of the Pacific Northwest.

Job Sheet 1 Blade Aerodynamics

Safety Zone Application Construction Phase Sheringham Shoal Wind Farm Project

2MW baseline wind turbine: model development and verification (WP1) The University of Tokyo & Hitachi, Ltd.

This project has been withdrawn by the developer. Atlantic Array Wind Farm

Hywind. Deep offshore wind operational experience. Finn Gunnar Nielsen, Statoil RDI

Atlantic Array Wind Farm

Pathways Interns: Annika O Dea, Ian Conery, Andrea Albright

Tension-Leg-Buoy (TLB) Platforms for Offshore Wind Turbines

Pioneer Array Micro-siting Public Input Process Frequently Asked Questions

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Contributions from a multidisciplinary university Finn Gunnar Nielsen Professor Geophysical Institute

The impact of different means of transport on the operation and maintenance strategy for offshore wind farms

April 7, Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd.

Examining the merits of jack up platforms as foundations for the offshore wind industry

SUNY Canton Wind Energy System

International regulations and guidelines for maritime spatial planning related to safe distances to multiple offshore structures (e.g.

MAR 110 LECTURE #20 Storm-Generated Waves & Rogue Waves

AMSA A Roadmap Forward & Relevant Alaska Activities. Captain Bob Pawlowski, NOAA (Ret), MNI Legislative Liaison to the Denali Commission

V MW Versatile megawattage

TRACK RECORD SEP. 2018

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

Metocean criteria for fatigue assessment. Rafael V. Schiller 5th COPEDI Seminar, Oct 8th 2014.

Site-Specific Assessment of Jack-Ups Part 5: When Things Go Wrong Lessons and Mitigations

Wave Hub Update All Energy 21/22 May Stuart Herbert Commercial Director

Heron s Application for Wind Industry - Gorillas Need Not Apply

Sensor Platform Project Marine Trials Bidders Conference. Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy fundyforce.ca

COMPARISON OF DEEP-WATER ADCP AND NDBC BUOY MEASUREMENTS TO HINDCAST PARAMETERS. William R. Dally and Daniel A. Osiecki

NORCOWE Reference Wind Farm

EMPOWERING OFFSHORE WINDFARMS BY RELIABLE MEASUREMENTS

Sea-going vessel versus wind turbine

TOPICS TO BE COVERED

Synoptic Lab, MET 421, Test 2

Low Wind High Yields Series

170 points. 38 points In your textbook, read about modern oceanography. For each item write the word that meets the description.

OFFSHORE WIND Kosten heute und morgen welche Potentiale zur Kostensenkung gibt es

High altitude wind generation The Rotokite

7 YEARS METEOMAST AMRUMBANK WEST

TARPON A Minimal Facilities Platform

The Marking of Offshore Wind Farms. Provide guidance for a response to IALA. M-4 B445.8 &.9 (& B for on-shore wind farms).

Wind Loads On Offshore Structures Marin

Assessment and operation of Wind Turbine Installation Vessels.

Whitney Hauslein Global War Wa ming

TITAN 200 OFFSHORE SUBSTRUCTURE FOR WIND TURBINES

Report of the Committee to Study Offshore Wind Energy and the Development of Other Ocean Power Technology

Post-mortem study on structural failure of a wind farm impacted by super typhoon Usagi

Offshore Wind Energy Stringent quality assurance and quality control. Coastal and Freshwater Fast responding and flexible organisation

Farm Energy IQ. Farms Today Securing Our Energy Future. Wind Energy on Farms

Seabed Drilling for Marine Energy

Wind Energy Technology. What works & what doesn t

A NOVEL FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE CONCEPT: NEW DEVELOPMENTS

MOOS IvP Helm Based Simulations of Collision Avoidance by an Autonomous Surface Craft Performing Repeat-Transect Oceanographic Surveys

Massachusetts Lobstermen s Association 3/14/2018. March

Navigation with Leeway

Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution Operation, Inspection, Maintenance and Decommissioning Strategy Bute Cumbrae Cable Replacement

Abrupt marine boundary layer changes revealed by airborne in situ and lidar measurements

Dare County Nourishment Project Town of Duck

Model Tests for a Floating Wind Turbine on Three Different Floaters

Transcription:

Virginia Offshore Wind Advanced Technology Demonstration Program and Test Pad Sites Briefing to Virginia Offshore Wind Development Authority Richmond, VA 08 December 2011 George Hagerman VCERC Director of Offshore Wind Research Virginia Tech Advanced Research Institute Jonathan Miles James Madison University Rick Thomas Tiimmons Group

VCERC-Identified Needs for Advanced Technology Demonstration George Hagerman

Virginia Advanced Technology Demonstration Project Characterization Distinguished from private industry projects on Eastern Shore Specifically designed to address research roadmap of VCERC report Project plans and findings will be made public to benefit multiple offshore wind stakeholders, including turbine designers, commercial project developers, and state and federal regulatory agencies Site 1 to measure radar effects and test mitigation technologies Commercially available low wind speed turbine of 2- to 3-MW rated capacity with rotor diameter of 100 m or more In addition to being within range of multiple air traffic control and long-range surveillance radars, also located within range of Wakefield NEXRAD Doppler weather radar Land or pier-based, interconnected behind the meter to customer in northern Suffolk or Portsmouth

Virginia Advanced Technology Demonstration Project Characterization Site 2 to demonstrate novel foundations and installation methods Subscale trial-and-error testing of rapidly installed foundations Shallow, well-protected waters off Newport News Point where vessels and barges can be staged behind wave screen Test turbines for weight and mass distribution; will not be operational and will not be electrically interconnected Site 3 to fully measure turbine-structure-soils response to metocean loading, to observe avian interactions with turbine, and to validate various remote sensing technologies Commercially available, already type-certified offshore wind turbine of 5- to 7-MW rated capacity with rotor diameter of 150 m or more Oceanic environment subject to full force of offshore storm winds and exposed to high swells from tropical storms and hurricanes to southeast CBBT Fourth Island remote sensing range of 3.2 to 4.0 km; also within line of site of sensors on other CBBT islands or at Cape Henry

Stationary ASR and ARSR Installations are of Particular Concern to Virginia Offshore Wind Backup slides show LOS ranges for these six radar installations

Langley AFB 1 st Fighter Wing Concern over Impact on Tactical Radar During VACAPES Training Departure routes Recovery routes Exercise areas

Recognition of 1 to 10 m 2 RCS Targets may be Compromised 80 to 200 NM Away from Projects

Metocean Constraints on Hub-Height Crane Lifts 53 to 76 days 38 to 50 days Maximum sea state conditions for jacking are 1 to 1.5 m significant wave height. Maximum wind speeds for crane lifting to a hub height of 80 or 90 m are 8 m/s for blades and 11 m/s for nacelles. Tables show percentage of time that conditions under these limits occur at the Chesapeake Light Tower, 24 km offshore. Modeling is underway to extrapolate to the commercial lease area, 44 km to 69 km offshore.

Attributes of Novel Foundation-Installation Design Small-diameter legs in multi-pile seafloor template reduce potential for large scour pit. Maritime operation with no crane lifts to hub height. 2004 MERLIN concept shown above has significant wave height limit of 2.5 m, nearly tripling total installation weather window off Virginia Beach to ~350 days per year. Allision-friendly: modeling studies suggest that vessel adrift would slew around surface-piercing monopole as opposed to becoming trapped within surface-piercing trusswork of jacket-type structure.

Allision Risk must be Considered for Foundations to be used in Virginia WEA

Measurements in Oceanic Environment can Verify Metocean Inputs & Turbine-Foundation Response Metocean design environment (for extreme survival and for accumulated fatigue damage) in North Sea is dominated by extra-tropical cyclones, which are large, slow-moving winter storms where wind and wave forces have similar directional alignment. As shown in lower right simulation of force time series on jacket member, aerodynamic damping of rotor greatly reduces structural response to wave loads. Increasing force

Last Published Full-Scale Offshore Measurements were on 2 MW Turbine with 66 m Diameter Rotor 66 m 62 m The Blyth project consists of two Vestas V66 2MW turbines, located ~1km offshore in 9 m mean water depth (6-11 m with tidal variation), installed in late 2000 on rock-socket monopile foundations at a hub height of 62 m.

Economically Viable Turbines for Offshore Mid-Atlantic Projects will be MUCH Larger Nordex and Siemens also have direct-drive 6 MW turbines with 150 m diameter rotor at 90 m Hub Height ALSTOM Power 6 MW with 150 m diameter rotor = 2,945 m 2 swept area per MW VCERC baseline design: Vestas 3 MW with 90 m diameter rotor A B Vestas 3 MW with 112 m diameter rotor = 3,284 m 2 swept area per MW (requires 18% larger rotor swept area for same energy production as direct-drive TG)

Large Tower-Top Motions of Operating Turbines in Hurricane Waves a Fatigue and Durability Concern CUT OUT SPEED Hurricane Irene Waves from SW grew from 9 ft to 16 ft over 12 hours, while winds blowing from E grew from 15 to 30 knots. Turbine cut-out speed of 25 m/s is 48.6 knots.

Need for Validation of Avian Remote Sensing and Observation of Flight Behaviors Around Turbine

CBTT Islands offer Nationally Unique and safe Platform for Trained Observers

Advanced Technology Demonstration Project Site Identification and Study Maps Rick Thomas

Technology Demonstration Site 1 Study Area for Radar Effects Measurement & Mitigation Site IB Site IC Site IA

Technology Demonstration Site 1 Study Area for Radar Effects Measurement & Mitigation

Technology Demonstration Site 2 Study Area for Sub-Scale Foundations and Installation Methods Area deeded to the City of Newport News by the Commonwealth of Virginia Site 2A Site 2B

Technology Demonstration Site 2 Study Area for Sub-Scale Foundations and Installation Methods

Technology Demonstration Site 3 Study Area for Full-Scale Installation and Avian Interaction Site 3 Site 3

Technology Demonstration Site 3 Study Area for Full-Scale Installation and Avian Interaction

Thank You! VCERC Offshore Wind Studies Final Report: www.vcerc.org/report.htm Any questions? Email: hagerman@vt.edu

Back-Up Slides Showing Stationary Radar LOS to 100 m and 250 m Rotor Tip Heights Timmons Group GIS display using data from www.nrdc.org/energy/readgdb.asp

Site 1 ASR Line of Site (LOS) to 100 m High Turbine Rotor Tip

Site 1 ASR Line of Site (LOS) to 250 m High Turbine Rotor Tip

Site 1 ARSR Line of Site (LOS) to 100 m High Turbine Rotor Tip

Site 1 ARSR Line of Site (LOS) to 250 m High Turbine Rotor Tip

Site 1 NEXRAD Line of Site (LOS) to 100 m High Turbine Rotor Tip

Site 1 NEXRAD Line of Site (LOS) to 250 m High Turbine Rotor Tip