The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites

Similar documents
Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

Session 2: Wind power spatial planning techniques

Session 2a: Wind power spatial planning techniques. IRENA Global Atlas Spatial planning techniques 2-day seminar

Wind Project Siting and Permitting Blaine Loos

Bankable Wind Resource Assessment

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

Predicting climate conditions for turbine performance

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

WindProspector TM Lockheed Martin Corporation

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

Wind Power. Kevin Clifford METR 112 April 19, 2011

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

Buckland Wind Resource Report

Kake, Alaska Wind Resource Report

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009

Full Classification acc. to IEC for SoDAR AQ510 Wind Finder. Vincent Camier, Managing Director, Ammonit Measurement GmbH

Fundamentals of Wind Energy

Site Description: Tower Site

windnavigator Site Analyst Report

Session 2b: Wind power spatial planning techniques

Wind Projects: Optimizing Site Selection

Terms and Definitions for Small Wind Site Assessor

Site Assessment Report. Wind farm: Ascog Farm (GB)

Wind Resource Assessment for CHEFORNAK, ALASKA

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes

On the use of rotor equivalent wind speed to improve CFD wind resource mapping. Yavor V. Hristov, PhD Plant Performance and Modeling Vestas TSS

Wind Assessment Basics

Wind Resource Assessment for DEADHORSE, ALASKA

Yellowknife Area Wind Potential

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

LiDAR Application to resource assessment and turbine control

Exploring Wind Energy

Pitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report

Testing and Validation of the Triton Sodar

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

Wind Resource Assessment for SAINT PAUL, ALASKA

Wind Farm Power Performance Test, in the scope of the IEC

Comparison of flow models

Wind shear and its effect on wind turbine noise assessment Report by David McLaughlin MIOA, of SgurrEnergy

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

LES* IS MORE! * L ARGE E DDY S IMULATIONS BY VORTEX. WindEnergy Hamburg 2016

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE STATE OF WYOMING

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

Energy Output. Outline. Characterizing Wind Variability. Characterizing Wind Variability 3/7/2015. for Wind Power Management

Wind Energy Resource and Technologies

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

Advanced pre and post-processing in Windsim

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Rural Small Wind Energy:

Outline. Wind Turbine Siting. Roughness. Wind Farm Design 4/7/2015

Saint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers)

Lopez Community Land Trust. Final Wind Energy Report

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

AN ISOLATED SMALL WIND TURBINE EMULATOR

PARK - Main Result Calculation: PARK calculation (5 x 166m, + LT CORR + MITIGATION) N.O. Jensen (RISØ/EMD)

Wind farm performance

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

WindPRO version Nov 2012 Project:

Workshop Session 1: Resources, technology, performance

New Stuyahok-Ekwok Intertie Route Wind Power Site Options

Investigation on Deep-Array Wake Losses Under Stable Atmospheric Conditions

Sustainable Energy Science and Engineering Center. Wind Energy

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Wind Resource Assessment for KING SALMON, ALASKA

Wind Flow Validation Summary

Egegik, Alaska Wind Resource Assessment Report

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

Characterization of winds through the rotor plane using a phased array SODAR and recommendations for future work

WIND CONDITIONS MODELING FOR SMALL WIND TURBINES

Inuvik Wind Monitoring Update 2016

Wind Resource Assesment and Turbine Selection: Case Study for Mannar, Sri Lanka

Wind Resource Assessment Østerild National Test Centre for Large Wind Turbines

Energy from wind and water extracted by Horizontal Axis Turbine

Farm Energy IQ. Farms Today Securing Our Energy Future. Wind Energy on Farms

WIND DATA REPORT. Quincy DPW, MA

J7.6 LIDAR MEASUREMENTS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO TRADITIONAL ANEMOMETRY IN WIND ENERGY RESEARCH. Golden, CO, U.S.A.

Tidal influence on offshore and coastal wind resource predictions at North Sea. Barbara Jimenez 1,2, Bernhard Lange 3, and Detlev Heinemann 1.

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

Sonic Detection and Ranging (SODAR) Data Collection and Evaluation Report

EMPOWERING OFFSHORE WINDFARMS BY RELIABLE MEASUREMENTS

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

Can Wind Energy Be Captured in New York City? Case Study on Urban Wind based on a Feasibility Study by Orange Line Studio. Spark 101 Educator Resource

Wind Speed and Energy at Different Heights on the Latvian Coast of the Baltic Sea

WIND DATA REPORT. Swan s Island, ME

Wake effects at Horns Rev and their influence on energy production. Kraftværksvej 53 Frederiksborgvej 399. Ph.: Ph.

Wind Power Potential Assessment of Complex Terrain at RGPV Hill Top

renewable energy projects by renewable energy people

REMOTE SENSING APPLICATION in WIND ENERGY

WIND DATA REPORT. Ragged Mt Maine

Wind Turbine Generator System Pika T701 Acoustic Test Report

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT WBZ

Windcube FCR measurements

WIND DATA ANALYSIS AND WIND FLOW SIMULATION OVER LARGE AREAS

Valerijs Bezrukovs, Vladislavs Bezrukovs Ventspils University College Latvia. WREF2012 Denver, CO May 13-17, 2012

Supplement of Wind turbine power production and annual energy production depend on atmospheric stability and turbulence

Transcription:

The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites Bruce Bailey, President AWS Truewind, LLC 255 Fuller Road Albany, NY 12203 bbailey@awstruewind.com

Talk Topics Causes of Wind Resource Impacts on Project Viability Siting Linkages to Resource Assessment Wind Resource Definition Energy Production Prediction Uncertainty Analysis Due Diligence Objectives For Financing

What Causes Wind? Uneven heating of the earth s surface Daily heating and cooling cycles Earth s rotation Weather systems track and intensity Position of jet stream Local influences sea breezes, slope winds, channeling through valleys, etc.

Establishing Project Viability Wind Resources Determine: Project Location & Size Tower Height Turbine Selection & Layout Energy Production» annual, seasonal» on- & off-peak» capacity credit Cost of Energy/Cash Flow Warranty Terms Size of Emissions Credits The wind energy industry is more demanding of wind speed accuracy than any other industry.

Power in the Wind (W/m 2 ) = 1/2 x air density x swept rotor area x (wind speed) 3 ρ A V 3 Density = P/(RxT) P - pressure (Pa) R - specific gas constant (287 J/kgK) T - air temperature (K) Area = π r 2 Instantaneous Speed (not mean speed) kg/m 3 m 2 m/s

Summary of Wind Resource Planning Steps Identify Attractive Candidate Sites Collect >1 yr Wind Data Using Tall Towers Adjust Data for Height and for Long-Term Climatic Conditions Use Model to Extrapolate Measurements to All Proposed Wind Turbine Locations Predict Energy Output From Turbines Quantify Uncertainties

Siting

Siting Main Objective: Find and design viable wind project sites Main Attributes: Adequate winds Access to transmission Permit approval reasonably attainable Sufficient land area for target project size» 30 50 acres per MW for arrays» 8 12 MW per mile for single row on ridgeline

Siting Attributes Winds» Minimum Class 4 desired (>7 m/s @ hub height) for wind farms Transmission» distance, voltage, excess capacity Permit approval» land use compatibility» public acceptance» visual, noise, and bird/bat impacts are leading issues Land area» economies of scale with larger project size» number of landowners

Siting Tools Wind Maps & Other Regional Resource Data Topographic Maps Transmission Line Maps & Databases Property Maps Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and associated data layers Local Wind Map Showing Transmission and Road Overlays Old vs. New Wind Maps of the Dakotas

Modern Wind Maps Old and new wind maps of the Dakotas Source: NREL utilize mesoscale numerical weather models high spatial resolution (100-200 m grid = 3-10 acre squares) simulate land/sea breezes, low level jets, channeling give wind speed estimates at multiple heights extensively validated std error typically 4-7% GIS compatible reduce development risks

www.windexplorer.com/newyork/newyork.htm Wind data projections available at a 200 m grid resolution statewide

Measurement

Sources of Wind Resource Info Existing Data (surface & upper air)» usually not where needed» use limited to general impressions» potentially misleading Modeling/Mapping» integrates wind data with terrain, surface roughness & other features New Measurements» site specific using towers & other measurement systems

How and What To Measure Anemometers, Vanes, Data Loggers, Masts Measured Parameters» wind speed, direction, temperature» 1-3 second sampling; 10-min or hourly recording Derived Parameters» wind shear, turbulence intensity, air density Multiple measurement heights» best to measure at hub height» can use shorter masts by using wind shear derived from two other heights to extrapolate speeds to hub height Multiple tower locations, especially in complex terrain Specialty measurements of growing importance» Sodar, vertical velocity & turbulence in complex terrain

Typical Monitoring Tower Heights up to 60 m Tubular pole supported by guy wires Installed in 1-2 days without concrete using 3 people Solar powered; cellular data communications

Raising the Tower

Final Touches / Sensor Orientation

Wind Resource Assessment Handbook Fundamentals for Conducting a Successful Monitoring Program Published by NREL» www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/ fy97/22223.pdf Peer reviewed Technical & comprehensive Topics include:» Siting tools» Measurement instrumentation» Installation» Operation & maintenance» Data collection & handling» Data validation & reporting» Costs & labor requirements WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK Fundamentals For Conducting A Successful Monitoring Program Prepared By: AWS Scientific, Inc. 255 Fuller Road Albany, NY 12203 NREL Subcontract No. TAT-5-15283-01 April 1997 Prepared for: National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, CO 80401

Data Analysis Wind Speed (m/s) Hours/ Year 0 0.0 1 434.4 2 823.4 3 1,098.6 4 1,228.7 5 1,216.5 6 1,092.3 7 900.8 8 687.5 9 487.9 10 323.0 11 200.0 12 115.9 13 63.0 14 32.1 15 15.4 16 6.9 17 2.9 18 1.2 19 0.4 20 0.2 21 0.1 22 0.0 23 0.0 24 0.0 25 0.0 26 0.0 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Wind Speed (m/s) Speed Frequency Distribution Turbine Output (kw) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 GE 1.5xle - 1.5 MW 0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Wind Speed (m /s) Wind Turbine Power Curve: Output As a Function of Speed Wind Direction Rose

Wind Shear The change in horizontal wind speed with height Wind Shear is important when extrapolating wind speed data from a met. mast that is shorter than the intended hub height of the turbine A function of wind speed, surface roughness (may vary with wind direction), and atmospheric stability (changes from day to night) Wind shear exponents are higher at low wind speeds, above rough surfaces, and during stable conditions Z 2 = 80 m V 2 = 7.7 m/s V 1 = 7.0 m/s Z 1 = 50 m Typical exponent (α) values:».10 -.15: water/beach».15 -.25: gently rolling farmland».25 -.40+: forests/mountains α = Log 10 [V 2 /V 1 ] Log 10 [Z 2 /Z 1 ] Wind Shear Profile α V 2 = V 1 (Z 2 /Z 1 ) α

Predicting Long-Term Wind Conditions From Short-Term Measurements Measure - Correlate - Predict Technique Measure one year of data on-site using a tall tower Correlate with one or more regional climate reference stations» Need high r 2» Reference station must have long-term stability» Upper-air rawinsonde data may be better than other sources for correlation purposes Predict long-term (7+ yrs) wind characteristics at project site Project Site 60 m Wind Speed (m/s) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Airport C Regression y = 1.7278x + 0.7035 2 R = 0.8801 Airport B Regression y = 1.4962x + 0.4504 R 2 = 0.875 Airport A Regression y = 1.0501x + 0.4507 R 2 = 0.8763 Airport A Airport B Airport C 0 5 10 15 20 Reference Station Mean Wind Speed (m/s) This plot compares a site s hourly data with three regional airport stations. A multiple regression resulted in an r 2 of 0.92.

Energy Prediction For Wind Farm

Sample Energy Production Calculation Turbine Output (kw) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Turbine Power Curve GE 1.5xle - 1.5 MW 0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Wind Speed (m /s) GE 1.5xle (Altitude Adjusted) WS (m/s) Output (kwh) Wind Speed Frequency Distribution 1200 0 0.0 1100 1 0.0 2 0.0 1000 cut in 3 1,323.3 900 4 60,484.4 800 5 168,173.6 6 297,296.5 700 7 431,266.7 600 8 539,540.4 500 9 582,520.0 10 534,351.4 400 11 415,751.9 300 12 281,729.8 200 13 173,933.0 14 101,064.2 100 15 55,702.5 0 16 29,138.2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 17 14,472.9 18 6,828.3 Wind Speed (m/s) 19 3,061.0 cut out 20 1,304.1 21 0.0 22 0.0 INPUTS 39 On-Site Turbines 23 0.0 6.738 80 Meter Weibull C Gross Output per Turbine 3,698 MWh/yr 24 0.0 2.034 Weibull K at 50m Net Energy per Turbine 3,258 MWh/yr 25 0.0 1.50 Turbine Capacity (MW) Number of Turbines 39 Gross Plant Production 144,220 MWh/yr Net Plant Production 127,048 MWh/yr Net Capacity Factor 24.8% Probability (hours/year)

Energy Production Projection Multiply wind speed frequency distribution data (annual hours per 0.5 or 1.0 m/s speed bin) by turbine power curve output values (for same speed bins)» Power curve must be adjusted for site air density Sum the product of all speed bins for the total gross energy production (MWh) Determine production loss factors and their magnitude» Wakes, availability, electrical, blade soiling/icing, high wind hysteresis, cold temperatures» Cumulative losses are typically 10-15% Deduct losses to calculate net energy production Determine net production for different probability levels (P75, P90, P95, etc.) based on uncertainty analysis

Micrositing Predicting Wind Conditions at Every Turbine, and Optimizing Turbine Locations Software tools (WindFarmer, WindFarm, WindPro) are available to optimize the location and performance of wind turbines, once the wind resource within a project area is defined.

Optimization Tools Turbine Noise Emissions Wind Resource Mapping & Turbine Energy Production Photosimulations

Conclusions The wind resource drives project viability. Wind conditions are site-specific and time/height variable. Accuracy is crucial. Wind resource assessment programs must be designed to maximize accuracy. Combination of measurement and modeling techniques gives the most reliable result. Know the uncertainties and incorporate into decision making. Good financing terms depend on it.