Toronto SimCap Toronto, ON, Canada, July 2014 SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 sidrasolutions.com sidrasolutions.com/forums youtube.com/sidrasolutions
Our company Multi-Award Winning Company 2010 Victorian Small Business Innovation Award 2009 Governor of Victoria Export Award 2008 Contribution to the Transportation Profession Award of the ITE Australia & New Zealand Section to Dr R. Akçelik Quality Management System Certificate # QEC27492 2 of 38
SIDRA the word Signalised (and unsignalised) Intersection Design and Research Aid 3 of 38
SIDRA SOLUTIONS WEBSITE YouTube Channel for our latest TUTORIAL and SUPPORT videos on all our software. Subscribe and stay posted. youtube.com/sidrasolutions Support Download ARTICLES Training Over 220 training workshops with about 4000 delegates attending since July 2000. 4 of 38
SIDRA INTERSECTION Background First released in 1984 Continuous development in response to user feedback SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 (including NETWORK Model) Biggest changes in the 30-year history of the software Major data structure and user interface changes About 9000 licences in 1650 organisations in 82 Countries 5 of 38
SIDRA INTERSECTION Users USA Australia South Africa Canada Arabian Peninsula Malaysia New Zealand Slovenia Singapore Spain Norway Italy United Kingdom Chile Other Europe Other Asia and Africa Other Latin America 103 94 77 64 61 34 26 23 20 17 15 14 53 71 37 377 8800 Licences (1650 Organisations) 82 Countries 563 Latest Version 6.0, 5.1, 5.0, 4.0, 3.x Users Only (23 May 2014) 6 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? STRONG RESEARCH BASE: Empirical and theoretical methods combined... Metering Signals Research for VIC ROADS 20 years at Australian Road Research Board 14 years at Akcelik & Associates 7 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? Not just a roundabout software package! MODEL CONSISTENCY in evaluating alternative intersection treatments Micro-analytical method for evaluating alternative treatments for INTERSECTIONS AND NETWORKS in one package: Roundabouts Signals Sign Control Pedestrian Crossings 8 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? MODEL CONSISTENCY for different intersection types (definition of delay, back of queue, stops, etc). Unique gap-acceptance method by signal analogy helps to model back of queue and stops for roundabouts and twoway sign control. Important for NETWORK Modeling 9 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? LANE-BASED MODEL More realistic and reliable analysis compared with approach - based and lane group (link) - based methods from UK and USA: General: Unequal lane flows, De facto exclusive lanes, Short lanes (approach and exit), Slip / Bypass lanes (Giveway / Yield, Continuous, Signals) Roundabouts (Circulating lane use; Dominant and subdominant lanes) NETWORK Model (lane queues, lane blockage, signal platoon arrival and departure patterns) Individual approach, exit and circulating lanes have different characteristics Slip / Bypass Lane for BUSES ONLY Approach Short Lane Exit Short Lane 10 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? VEHICLE PATH model for stop-start traffic Emissions - CO 2, CO, HC, NO x Fuel Consumption Operating COST Also used for Geometric Delay calculations Distance Speed Four Basic Path Elements Time Time 11 of 38
Acceleration Deceleration models Polynomial acceleration profile model Light Vehicles Heavy Vehicles 12 of 38
FuelConsumption (ml/s) Estimated fuel consumption (ml/s) New in SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 Fuel and emission model parameters updated for modern vehicles Model parameters are available for user input (model calibration ) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Toyota Corolla Ascent 2004 Measured Fuel Consumption Estimated Fuel Consumption 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Toyota Corolla Ascent 2004 y = 0.9903x + 0.0076 R² = 0.9774 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Measured fuel consumption rate (ml/s) Estimated vs measured instantaneous fuel consumption rates Fuel Consumption and Emission Models Calibrated for Modern Vehicles (IPENZ 2012) www.sidrasolutions.com/resources /Articles 0.5 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Elapsed time (s) 13 of 38
Level of Analysis Detail more detailed model of TRAFFIC STREAM Individual vehicles Microsimulation models Drive cycles (Vehicle paths) Traffic flows TRL (UK) Roundabout Model HCM (US) (Signals, Signs) TRANSYT HCM (US) (Roundabouts) SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 Microanalytical model Speed-flow functions Strategic transport planning models APPROACHES Lane Groups / LINKS Individual LANES Lane SEGMENTS HCM: Highway Capacity Manual (2010) more detailed model of ROAD GEOMETRY 14 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? Includes two Roundabout Capacity Models SIDRA Standard (calibrated for US driving conditions) HCM 2010 Common fundamental features: Geometry and Driver Behavior (Gap Acceptance) effects combined Lane-based method Empirical and theoretical methods combined Non-linear form 15 of 38
Dominant lane follow-up headway (s) Dominant lane critical gap (s) What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? SIDRA Standard Model Advantages Numerous extensions More extensive GEOMETRY parameters than HCM 2010 Follow-up Headway and Critical Gap values decrease with increased circulating flows 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 More capacity Di = 30, ne = 1 Di = 50, ne = 2 Di = 80, ne = 3 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 More capacity Di = 30, ne = 1 Di = 50, ne = 2 Di = 80, ne = 3 2.0 4.0 1.5 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 0.0 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 Circulating flow (pcu/h) Circulating flow (pcu/h) 16 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? Roundabout Geometry 17 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? Now a powerful lane-based micro-analytical NETWORK MODEL all intersection types (signals, roundabouts, sign control) easy to configure using SIDRA Sites diverse Movement Classes Light Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Buses Bicycles Large Trucks Trams / Light Rail two User Classes Combined with the lane-based method, new Movement Classes allow modeling of Bus Priority Lanes, Bicycle Lanes, and so on 18 of 38
What makes SIDRA INTERSECTION different? Unique Method for Complex Network Design and Congestion Modeling Backward spread of congestion (reduced upstream capacity) Capacity constraint (reduced downstream arrival flows) The two basic elements of the model are highly interactive with opposing effects. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 uses a network-wide iterative process to find a solution that balances these opposing effects. Backward spread of congestion and capacity constraint are common to all intersection types. 19 of 38
SIDRA INTERSECTION Version 6 SIDRA NETWORK model: Backward spread of congestion: capacity reduction at upstream lanes blocked by downstream lane queues. Capacity constraint: oversaturated upstream lanes reduce demand volumes for downstream movements Lane Movements: blockage of upstream lanes depends on lane choices of movements from approach lanes to exit lanes Upstream and downstream lane flows and mid-block lane changes on an approach to determine platooning. 20 of 38
Network Example: Freeway Interchange Comparison Roundabout Interchange Signalized Diamond Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange 21 of 38
Example: Staggered T Roundabouts Two T-shaped roundabouts placed with 50 m distance between them to demonstrate the lane-based network model. Canadian ITE 2013 Annual Meeting 22 of 38
Signal Timings: Variable Phase Sequence Analysis Diamond Overlap Variable Phase Sequence * Variable phase B1* E1* A C D F B2* E2* Sequences generated: A - B1 - C - D - E1 - F A - B1 - C - D - E2 - F A - B1 - C - D - F A - B2 - C - D - E1 - F A - B2 - C - D - E2 F A - B2 - C - D - F A - C - D - E1 - F A - C - D - E2 - F A - C - D - F 23 of 38
Pedestrians at signals Slip lane crossing and diagonal crossing (all-pedestrian phase) features and more flexible pedestrian staged crossing arrangements 24 of 38
Flexible Geometry Two-Segment Lanes (with lane segments that can be allocated to different Movement Classes) Contra-flow lanes Strip islands (between lanes) High-angle and low-angle slip (bypass) lanes 25 of 38
SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 New Features - Summary Bus Priority Lane and Phase Example 26 of 38
Two-Way Sign Control (Give Way and Stop) Method to adjust critical gap and follow-up headway automatically for intersection geometry and control, with option to apply reduction with opposing flow rate Pedestrians 27 of 38
DEMAND AND SENSITIVITY Analysis Design Life, Flow Scale and Sensitivity Analysis options with reports and Graphs for intersection lane approach movement (including separate results for individual movement classes) 28 of 38
User Models Two User Models for calibrating the complete default system for local conditions Edit Reset Defaults Export Import This facility will be supported in future versions 29 of 39
Major New Features Introduced in SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 Recently User Models Model Calibration Needs Input Comparison Output Comparison (Site & Network) Variable Run Network Configuration Enhancements Network Displays Network Flows Network Clone and Import API and Utilities: Excel Applications VOLUMES and ANNUAL SUMS Linking with other software packages 30 of 38
SIDRA Success Stories Example 1 Fitzsimons Lane - Porter St Roundabout, Melbourne, Australia Using SIDRA, Vic Roads engineers redesigned a highly congested two-lane roundabout in Melbourne as a three-lane roundabout eliminating persistent congestion. 31 of 38
Average back of queue (veh) (SIDRA estimate) Queue clearance time (s) (SIDRA estimate) SIDRA Success Stories Example 2 Ferntree Gully Rd - Scoresby Rd (Melbourne) Actuated Signalised Intersection The SIDRA estimates of performance measures for actuated signals were found to be highly accurate based on the results of real-life surveys at an intersection in Melbourne. 20 35 16 y = 1.1033x - 0.3682 R 2 = 0.9761 30 y = 1.0693x - 1.7702 R 2 = 0.9693 12 25 20 8 15 4 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 Average back of queue (veh) (Manual survey) 5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Queue clearance time (s) (Manual survey) 32 of 38
SIDRA Model Success Stories Example 3 SIGNALISED INTERSECTIONS US North Carolina State University carried out a comprehensive study and evaluation of alternative software packages for signalised intersections (SIDRA, TRANSYT, HCS/HCM, Signal 94, HCM/Cinema, EVIPAS) for the North Carolina DOT. The report stated: SIDRA s powerful combination of high model usability, superior matching of field delays at the lane group level, versatile optimization features, and graphical user interface makes it the model of choice.. 33 of 38
SIDRA Model Success Stories Example 4 Richmond Rd and Garfield Rd Intersection, Marsden Park, NSW, Australia ARRB study for AUSTROADS (Project NS 1371 - Modelling and Analysis of Network Operations) compared micro-analytical (SIDRA INTERSECTION) and microsimulation (VISSIM) modelling of this intersection including comparison against field measurements. The study found that Cycle average queue estimates were within one vehicle of field measurement. 34 of 38
SIDRA TRIP Version 1.1 released with new Licensing! Vehicle Trip Assessment Software for GPS Data travel level of service performance (delay, speed, travel time) operating cost and user cost (including toll cost) fuel consumption emissions noise and Quick Scenario Analysis 35 of 38
SIDRA TRIP SIDRA TRIP Data: Two methods Data collected by an instrumented vehicle, e.g. using a GPS data logger User-specified drivecycle data 36 of 38
SIDRA TRIP Using SIDRA TRIP, you can assess: Travel conditions Traffic performance User Cost / Operating cost Fuel consumption Emissions Noise 37 of 38
END OF PRESENTATION Thank you! www.sidrasolutions.com