STANDARD PROCEDURE FOR MANAGING SPEED ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS

Similar documents
VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

Traffic Calming Policy

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Improve the livability of our streets by

City of Edinburg Department of Public Works 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, TX (956) SPEED HUMPS INSTALLATION POLICY

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Draft Traffic Calming Policy Paper

RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

City of Tamarac, Florida Traffic Calming Policy

Town of Southwest Ranches Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY, PA

CITY CLERK. (City Council on October 2, 3 and 4, 2001, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Carroll County, Maryland

Community Transportation Plan

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INDEX SHEET

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

Traffic Calming Policy

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

City of Turlock Traffic Calming Program

Malvern Borough Local Traffic Calming

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Adopted by City Council February 2004 Revised by City Council August 2006

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Traffic Calming Rosemount Avenue, between Ralph Street and Queenslea Avenue

A Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement

City of Rocky Mount Residential Traffic Management Policy

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

Example Traffic Calming Approval Processes

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Traffic Calming Policy

NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy & Guidelines

Street Name Neighborhood Association Applicant Name. Neighborhood Traffic Management Information and Application Packet

Traffic Calming Policy Newtown Township, Delaware County, PA

Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia

Vince Auriemma, P.E., Deputy Public Works Director

Traffic Calming St. Clarens Avenue between Brandon Avenue and Davenport Road

SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP - NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY JENKINTOWN BOROUGH MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA

Citizens Handbook for Requesting Traffic Calming Devices

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

CITY OF VISTA TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Town of Clarkstown Traffic Calming Program. Table of Contents

CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program A Policy for Use of Traffic Calming on Local (Residential) Streets

City of San Mateo Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. Prepared by: Gary Heap, Senior Engineer & Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Residential Traffic Calming Handbook

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

RECOMMENDATION: Approve traffic calming projects as recommended by the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Committee (NTCC) on the following streets:

Southside Road. Prepared for: City of St. John s Police & Traffic Committee. Prepared by: City of St. John s Traffic Division

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

CITY OF ANN ARBOR TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROCESS OVERVIEW. Petitioner defines the project area limits and gathers petition signatures.

City of Sandy Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. Prepared for: City of Sandy

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 CMR:147:02 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Neighborhood Traffic Management Program

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

CITY OF TRACY TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Traffic Calming Program Update

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Town of Apex Process for Consideration of Traffic Calming Devices on Public Residential Streets 10/26/15

City of Mountlake Terrace Traffic Calming Guide

TOWN OF HALTON HILLS TRAFFIC CALMING PROTOCOL. Page 1 of 25

CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

City of Roxboro Traffic Calming Policy for Neighborhood Streets

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Corporate Report. Recommendation

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR POLICY

City of Overland Park Collector Street Traffic Calming Program

POLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING

PURPOSE OF PROGRAM... 2 GOALS / OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM... 2

City of Grass Valley Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Adopted November 12, 2002 Revised February 1, 2006

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

City of Charlottesville Traffic Calming Handbook

Washington County NEIGBORHOOD STREETS PROGRAM

BLUETT TRAFFIC CALMING ON-SITE MEETING #2 DISCUSSION SUMMARY

DOT Policy and Procedure Integrity Excellence Respect

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLAY COUNTY

Traffic Calming Policy

CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. COMMITTEE REPORT OF: February 15, 2018 ITEM C

Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Adopted July 9, 2012

City of Rancho Cordova Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) Manual

Table of Contents Introduction...1. A. Background B. Introduction to Traffic Calming Devices Purpose Statement...

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDELINES

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

Transcription:

STANDARD PROCEDURE FOR MANAGING SPEED ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS In response to frequent complaints about speeding on residential streets, the Public Works Agency and the Environmental and Transportation Advisory Committee (ETAC), an advisory committee to the City Council, have developed a formal procedure so that such requests can be handled effectively. The primary purpose for adopting the standard procedure was to provide uniformity in processing such requests, to ensure continuous community involvement and support in implementing the various measures for dealing with speeding on residential streets. The following is the standard procedure approved by ETAC for use in the City of Santa Ana to respond to citizen requests for reducing the speeds on residential streets. It should be noted that the procedure is only a guideline, not a regulation. STEP 1. LESS RESTRICTIVE MEASURES TO REDUCE SPEEDING PROBLEM Upon receiving the speed complaint(s), the City will verify the problem by conducting a speed survey. Depending on location and severity of the problem, any combination or all of the following measures will be undertaken: Police enforcement. Provide speed awareness letter. Provide mobile radar trailer. Keep Kids Alive Drive 25 Campaign If above efforts are not effective as determined by the City in reducing the speed, speed humps will be considered if requested. STEP 2. SPEED HUMP FEASIBILITY If speed humps are requested, Speed Hump Warrant is performed to determine if the location is feasible for speed hump installation (Attachment A). STEP 3. RESIDENTS TO CIRCULATE PETITION FOR SPEED HUMP If the location satisfies the warrant, the City will mail an information letter and a sample petition to all affected residents describing the nature of the petition to be circulated. The petition, by residents of the proposed speed hump street segment, must be submitted to the City (Attachment B). To demonstrate there is a widely held perception of a problem and adequate community support for further action, the petition should be returned with supporting signatures from typically 80% of the residences of the proposed speed hump segment (one signature per address).

All petitions must be submitted to the City by the assigned date on the information letter and petition (the fiscal year cut-off date is May 1 st ) for validation and prioritization for the following fiscal year. Staff notifies the Neighborhood Association, if it exists, of the request for speed humps. STEP 4. PRIORITIZATION A. All locations that meet the Speed Hump Warrant and petition requirements are prioritized by a point system based on the following: Criteria Basis For Assignment Max. Points Severity of speeding 5 points for every one mph (85% tile) over 50 35mph Total daily traffic volume For streets with traffic volumes greater than 35 or equal to 500 vehicles per day, 1 point for every 100 vehicles Speed related accidents 5 points for speed related accidents 5 Proximity to School or Park 250 feet or less of a school or a park 10 Between 251 and 500 feet of a school or a park Between 501 and 600 feet of a school or a park Total 7 3 100 points B. City determines the number of speed hump locations that can be funded for the following fiscal year. C. Those locations not funded in this fiscal year cycle will remain on the priority list for one more cycle. After that, the locations will be removed from the priority list. Private funding (if available) can be considered. STEP 5. AREA OF IMPACT FOR ADVISORY POLL For those locations that are funded, the City will determine the surrounding area likely to be affected by the proposed speed humps. This Area of Impact is used for advisory polling purposes. ETAC approves the Petition and Area of Impact for advisory polling. STEP 6. CITY POLLS RESIDENTS FOR SPEED HUMPS The City presents the Area of Impact, speed hump plan and advisory polling process to residents in the Area of Impact.

Those residents are then polled by mail. City staff will tally the advisory poll results. If ETAC does not recommend the speed humps, residents can request speed humps again after 24 months from the date of ETAC s recommendation. STEP 7. ETAC REVIEWS POLL RESULTS, HEARS PUBLIC COMMENTS AND MAKES RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ETAC reviews the poll results, staff recommendation, and hears public comments. ETAC makes appropriate recommendation to the City Council. STEP 8. CITY COUNCIL APPROVES FUNDING AND INSTALLATION If recommended by ETAC, City Council may approve funding and installation. STEP 9. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION City implements speed hump installation at locations approved by the City Council. Design is in accordance with current speed hump standard (Attachment C). STEP 10 EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS OF SPEED HUMPS Speeds and volumes are taken before installation and 6 months after installation of speed humps to determine the effectiveness. Study results are forwarded to ETAC and the neighborhood representative for information. ********** SPEED HUMP REMOVAL The City at anytime may undertake alteration or removal of speed humps if the speed humps are deemed to be a hazard to the public. ************ If you wish to make a request or would like more information, please contact the Traffic Engineering section of the Public Works Agency at (714) 647-5619. K:\traffic\DIST1\Speed Hump\Forms\Speed Hump Procedure ETAC Approved 10-13-05.doc

GLOSSARY Advisory Poll Participants or Residents Area of Impact: Daily Traffic: Eighty-fifth Percentile (85%- tile) Speed: ETAC Keep Kids Alive Drive 25 Campaign Mobile Radar Trailer: Police Enforcement: Residence: Speed Awareness Letter: Speed Hump Warrant: Speed Hump: Those to whom poll forms are distributed, within a given area of impact, as a result of their being in one of the following groups: 1. Residents of dwelling units with its own mailing address (one poll from per dwelling unit). 2. Owners of vacant land (one poll form per parcel). 3. Tenants of non-residential units, including those with business and commercial uses (one poll form per unit). 4. Designated representatives of properties with institutional land uses, such as schools, government offices, and non-profit organizations (one poll form per parcel). The street segment with the proposed speed hump and the adjacent streets that are likely to be affected due to significant increase in traffic and/or speed. A typical 24-hour traffic volume, including both directions of traffic. The speed below which 85 percent of all traffic on a given street segment is traveling. Environmental and Transportation Advisory Committee (ETAC) is an advisory committee appointed by the City Council. The committee acts in an advisory capacity to the City Council in reviewing environmental and transportation issues. A speed awareness program that uses lawn signs that read Keep Kids Alive Drive 25. A portable trailer that is capable of detecting speed of oncoming traffic and displaying that speed for the driver. Police officer monitoring the speed by radar and issuing speeding tickets as applicable. One legal address or legal dwelling unit, i.e., a "four-plex" consisting of four legal addresses. A letter containing speeding information to raise awareness of the residents in the neighborhood about the speeding problem in the area. Police enforcement has shown that it is usually residents living in the area who are doing the speeding. A minimum set of criteria which, when satisfied, justifies the installation of speed humps. A permanent section of raised pavement (asphalt) that is 12 feet wide, parabolic in shape, raising from street surfaces to an approximate height of 2 5/8 inches to 3 inches at the center.

ATTACHMENT A CITY OF SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY SPEED HUMP WARRANT Street: From: ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA MUST BE MET FOR CONSIDERATION OF SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. To: CRITERIA SATISFIED NOT SATISFIED REMARKS 1. Street is a residential street with no more than one lane in each direction. Lanes per direction: 2. Street is neither a primary fire access route nor a transit route. 3. The street is a through street, at least 500 feet long and uninterrupted by stop sign or traffic signal. Length: 4. The posted or prima facie speed limit is 25 mph. 5. The 85th percentile speed is > 35 mph. 85 th Percentile: 6. Adequate visibility can be provided at all speed hump locations. 7. Daily traffic on the street segment is less than or equal to 3500 vehicles per day. ADT: Performed by: Speed Hump Warrant Met Date: NO

ATTACHMENT B PETITION TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO INSTALL SPEED HUMPS STREET: FROM: TO: (cross street) (cross street) WHEREAS a speeding problem has been identified and confirmed on the above subject street segment; and WHEREAS actions to reduce the problem through less restrictive measures have not effectively reduced the problem, We, the undersigned, request the installation of speed humps on the above street segment. We understand that in order for the City to consider installing speed humps; this petition should have signatures (one per address) in favor of the proposed speed humps from typically 80% of residences on this street segment. We further understand that this street segment must meet all requirements outlined in the Standard Procedure for Managing Speed on Residential Streets for the installation of the speed humps. Contact Person: Daytime Phone: Before you sign this petition, be sure you understand the Standard Procedure for Managing Speed on Residential Streets (attached). NOTE: UPON PETITION SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY, MODIFICATIONS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS TO PETITIONER S RESPONSE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. PETITIONS ARE DUE ON (DATE). Date Received by City:

SPEED HUMP PETITION (Continued) STREET: FROM: TO: (cross street) (cross street) Contact Person: Daytime Phone: Before you sign this petition, be sure you understand the Standard Procedure for Managing Speed on Residential Streets (attached). NOTE: UPON PETITION SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY, MODIFICATIONS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS TO PETITIONER S RESPONSE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. PETITIONS ARE DUE ON (DATE). Date Received by City:

SPEED HUMP FLOW CHART Receive and Address Speeding Problems (STEP 1) Speed Problem NO Persists? Speed Hump Feasibility (STEP 2) Speed Hump Warrants Met? NO Residents Petition for Speed Humps (STEP 3) Typical 80% Petition Met? NO Prioritize Speed Hump Locations (STEP 4) Speed NO First NO Humps Time On Funded? List? ETAC Approves Petition and Area of Impact (STEP 5) Speed Humps Remain On Priority List To Compete With Next Years List City Polls Residents in Area of Impact for Speed Humps (STEP 6) ETAC Recommends NO ETAC Makes Recommendation (STEP 7) City Council Approves Funding and Installation (STEP 8) City Installs Speed Humps (STEP 9) City Evaluates Effectiveness (STEP 10) DONE