City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Similar documents
County of Spartanburg South Carolina

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Citizens Handbook for Requesting Traffic Calming Devices

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING

Malvern Borough Local Traffic Calming

CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program A Policy for Use of Traffic Calming on Local (Residential) Streets

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Carroll County, Maryland

Improve the livability of our streets by

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

STANDARD PROCEDURE FOR MANAGING SPEED ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX. For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

City of Tamarac, Florida Traffic Calming Policy

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP - NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Public Information Centre

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy & Guidelines

City of Edinburg Department of Public Works 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, TX (956) SPEED HUMPS INSTALLATION POLICY

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Traffic Calming Policy Manual

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY JENKINTOWN BOROUGH MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA

City of Turlock Traffic Calming Program

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY, PA

Community Transportation Plan

CITY OF ANN ARBOR TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROCESS OVERVIEW. Petitioner defines the project area limits and gathers petition signatures.

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Traffic Calming SECTION 1, CHAPTER Introduction What is Traffic Calming?

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX

Town of Clarkstown Traffic Calming Program. Table of Contents

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLAY COUNTY

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

TOWN OF HALTON HILLS TRAFFIC CALMING PROTOCOL. Page 1 of 25

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

City of Sandy Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. Prepared for: City of Sandy

AGENDA ITEM 6 D THOMASVILLE ROAD (HERMITAGE BOULEVARD TO LIVE OAK PLANTATION ROAD) ROADWAY SAFETY AUDIT

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

CITY OF DUNWOODY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Traffic Calming Policy

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

City of Mountlake Terrace Traffic Calming Guide

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Edenbrook Hill Drive Traffic Calming Study

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Residential Traffic Calming Handbook

BLUETT TRAFFIC CALMING ON-SITE MEETING #2 DISCUSSION SUMMARY

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines

City of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy City of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy Adopted June 26, 2017

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

REPORT. Engineering and Construction Department

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Orange Center Elementary School

Draft Traffic Calming Policy Paper

Access Management Standards

Driveway Design Criteria

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Town of Southwest Ranches Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

SECTION TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

CITY OF TRACY TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,

Corporate Report. Recommendation

Town of Apex Process for Consideration of Traffic Calming Devices on Public Residential Streets 10/26/15

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Traffic Calming Policy

CITY OF VISTA TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Traffic Calming St. Clarens Avenue between Brandon Avenue and Davenport Road

1.3 Pedestrian Environments

5 Transit & Traffic. Overview

City of Charlottesville Traffic Calming Handbook


Transcription:

City of Margate, Florida Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Table of Contents Page No. I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. TRAFFIC CALMING REQUEST AND PROCESSING PROCEDURES... 2 1. COMPLETE AND SUBMIT PROJECT APPLICATION... 2 2. EVALUATE APPLICATION... 2 3. GENERAL POLICY/QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES... 2 4. PROJECT PRIORITIZATION... 3 5. DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT PROJECT... 3 6. SPEED HUMP FIELD INSTALLATION GUIDELINES... 3 7. PROJECT EVALUATION... 4 Appendices APPENDIX A REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC CALMING STUDY APPLICATION APPENDIX B TRAFFIC CALMING TREATMENTS SPEED HUMP FLAT TOP SPEED HUMP LANDSCAPED MEDIAN ROUNDABOUT

I. Introduction The City of Margate has implemented a Traffic Calming Program to address the traffic related concerns of its residents on local street and residential roadways. Under this program, staff works with residents to identify traffic problems in their neighborhoods and create a neighborhood traffic plan that consists of solutions that are acceptable and appropriate. The Traffic Calming Program is another part of the City's commitment to the safety and livability of residential neighborhoods. Traffic Management is simply the modification of a roadway to discourage usage by a large number of vehicles which travel at higher than residential area speeds. It is seen as a long term goal to redirect traffic to more efficient thoroughfares and allowing our neighborhoods to maintain their residential character. As a component of the overall Traffic Management Program, the Traffic Calming Program provides information on the different types of treatments that may be used in a neighborhood traffic plan and the methodology that will be used to evaluate requests for traffic calming applications. Traffic calming treatments such as speed humps, roundabouts, modified intersections, or a combination of two or more treatments can restore a sense of livability to neighborhood streets that are not operating within the intent upon which they were planned. The Traffic Management Team, which addresses traffic calming issues and creates neighborhood traffic plans, was assembled to develop solutions to traffic related problems in neighborhoods. Team membership includes representative from the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Works Department, City Manager's office and the Department of Environmental and Engineering Services. When a problem is identified, the Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual outlines the policy to be used. It is important to note that throughout the process, interaction between City staff and the public is essential. It should be noted that requests are also reviewed by the City's Traffic Management Team for other possible solutions. If the preliminary review shows that a hazard to the public exists, the City may choose to address the problem separately from the procedures outlined in the Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual. The Police Chief may request to install traffic devices without requiring a formal traffic calming study request. This manual contains all the information you need to request traffic calming devices for your neighborhood. Please complete the enclosed application, and submit the application package by mail or e-mail. By mail: City of Margate Department of Environmental & Engineering Services Attn: Traffic Management Team 901 NW 66 th Avenue, Suite A Margate, FL 33063 By E-mail: DEES@margatefl.com 1

II. Traffic Calming Request and Processing Procedures 1. Complete and Submit Traffic Calming Study Application A preliminary traffic calming study can be initiated by a resident complaint, the request of a neighborhood association, or a Commissioner's request. The application in Appendix A of this manual should be completed and submitted to the Department of Environmental and Engineering Services. 2. Evaluate Application The Traffic Management Team will identify the study area, collect preliminary data and complete evaluation of the traffic calming request. The City of Margate Police Traffic Unit will perform speed and volume studies. The following items may be included in the study: A review of accident/crash reports for a three calendar year period Location of school, pedestrian oriented facilities or community facilities located on the subject street or within an established walking area Driveway density Presence/Absence of sidewalks To assist in evaluating the traffic calming request, staff will use the criteria described below, which is not all inclusive. 3. General Policy/Qualification Guidelines A. Volume - Traffic volume on the proposed street should be more than 300 vehicles per day but less than 4000 vehicles per day. B. Classification - The proposed street should be functionally classified as a local street with adjacent residential land uses. C. Vehicular Speed - The proposed street should have a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or less. Traffic studies must find that a speeding problem exits, based on the standard of an 85th percentile speed of 10 mph or faster than the posted speed limit. In these cases, traffic calming review and consideration is warranted. The 85th percentile speed is an excellent indicator of street character. D. Property Owner Concurrence - Speed humps will not be placed in front of any parcel where the owner did not sign the official petition in favor of the project. Proposed speed humps in front of such parcels will either be relocated (if possible) or removed from the project. E. Traffic Management Team Review - After review of the study, the project must be supported by Broward County Traffic and the Traffic Management Team. The neighborhood street would require 2/3 voter approval from residents and is subject to roadway design. Due to the curvature of some roadways, and other design characteristics, some streets may not be suitable for traffic calming. 2

4. Project Prioritization Projects are prioritized citywide based on the findings of the Traffic Management Team. The number of projects initiated each year depends on City funding and resources. The City will notify all project requesters of the status of their request after project approval. The City also notifies the appropriate neighborhood of the status of the neighborhood projects within their neighborhood and asks for their comments. 5. Design and Implement Project City staff will finalize the design and implementation process for the proposed traffic calming devices. Specific techniques may be installed as a "test site", while others will be installed permanently. "Test sites" will be monitored and evaluated for effectiveness. After a period of evaluation, measurable objectives and performance measures will be established on a case by case basis. It is noted that the Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards will be consulted for adherence in relation to any proposed traffic calming measures. 6. Speed Hump Field Installation Guidelines A. Proximity to Curves, Intersections or Stop Signs - Speed humps should be placed in straight sections of roadway. Where possible, speed humps should be located at least 100 feet back from a horizontal curve, intersection or stop signs. In addition, speed hump warning signs should be placed in such a manner as to be clearly visible by approaching motorists according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for visibility and driver reaction times. B. Pavement Condition - Existing pavement condition along the project street should be reviewed. Any deficiencies should be noted for discussion. The Public Works Department should be asked to inspect all affected streets prior to any proposed hump construction to determine if any pavement maintenance (resurfacing) is required. If it is determined that improvements or maintenance is required within 12 months, that work should be completed before humps are constructed. C. Curbs - Speed humps may be installed on streets without curbs. However, in order to avoid potential circumnavigation around humps at locations without curbs, precautions, such as the installation of roadside delineators, and/or street trees may need to be considered. D. Driveways - Construction of speed humps at a driveway location should be avoided where possible to reduce potential conflict. Clearance of 15 to 20 feet from any driveway is desirable. Equal spacing between driveways is also desirable whenever possible. Speed hump locations at lot lines are preferable. E. Spacing - Typically, speed humps are spaced between 300 to 500 feet apart for the length of the calming project. 3

F. Street Lighting - Existing street lights and areas of dense tree cover should be noted during the feasibility study. Placement of the humps in well-lighted sections of roadway is desirable whenever possible. A location in full sun and in proximity to an existing street light is best for visibility. G. Parking - Although, no special parking removal is required on or near speed humps, evidence of existing parking patterns should be noted and considered when determining a feasible speed hump location. H. Bus Stops - Where possible, speed humps should not be installed in proximity to designated bus stop or bus shelters. I. Utilities - Speed humps should be located in such a way as to avoid conflict with underground utility access to boxes, vaults and sewer manholes. J. Travel Lanes - Speed humps shall not be installed on streets with more than one through travel lane per direction. Speed humps shall not be installed in exclusive left-turn or right-turn lanes. Special care should be exercised when considering speed humps on streets with continuous left-turn lanes. In all cases, speed humps shall be constructed across the entire width of street surface with 12 to 18 inch clearance from curb face for drainage. 7. Project Evaluation Immediately following the installation of the project, City staff will begin an evaluation of the project's effectiveness. This evaluation includes, but is not limited to, field observations, traffic counts, speed studies and other data collection as needed. If the project has not met the objectives during the evaluation period, staff will notify the community's representatives. City staff and community representatives may then decide to make modifications to the current plan. These modifications may include the implementation of additional or different techniques, or the removal of the traffic calming devices. Diversion Potential: Adjacent streets identified as having potential for being impacted by vehicle diversion from the street being treated with traffic calming devices should be monitored both before and after speed and volume studies. Follow up studies should be scheduled 90 to 120 days after construction. 4

APPENDIX A Request for Traffic Calming Study Application

REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC CALMING STUDY APPLICATION We, the undersigned neighborhood request that the City of Margate add our neighborhood to the current list of pending neighborhood traffic studies. The street(s) of concern is (are) listed below as is a description of the traffic concerns. The signatures below, representing at least ten (10) households and or businesses on the subject street(s), indicate the neighborhood's commitment to work with the City for a safer traffic environment with the neighborhood. We understand that the traffic calming study involves active participation by our community. The decision making process may require us to set and attend neighborhood meetings and conduct further petition campaigns. Contact Person for the Neighborhood: (please print) Address: E-mail Address: Home Phone: Today s Date: Work Phone: Subject Street(s): Description of Traffic Concern: Number of homes/businesses within the affected area: Name Property Address Signature Please note: One signature per household only. Make additional copies as necessary. Return completed application to: City of Margate Department of Environmental & Engineering Services Attn: Traffic Management Team 901 NW 66 th Avenue, Suite A Margate, FL 33063

APPENDIX B - Traffic Calming Treatments

TYPE S-III ASPHALT 0.0" 0.92" 1.67" 2.25" 2.67" 2.92" 3" TACK COAT 0.0" EXISTING ASPHALT 2' 1' (TYP) 2' EXISTING CURB 6' 6' SAWCUT AND REMOVE 12' 2' OF ASPHALT (TYPICAL BOTH SIDES) ELEVATION VIEW A-A B OLD ASPHALT 12" A ASPHALT CENTERLINE EXISTING CURB NOTE: THE SPEED HUMP IS MADE WITH "STREET PRINT", A COLORED ASPHALT THAT IS STAMPED FOR A BRICK APPEARANCE. TYPICALLY THREE OR FOUR HUMPS ARE INSTALLED IN A SERIES AND ARE SPACED 300' TO 400' APART. CURB 12" B 12' PLAN VIEW 12" 3" TYPICAL 12" ADVANCE WARNING SIGN PLACED AHEAD OF FIRST SPEED HUMP (EACH WAY). EXISTING SLOPE TO CURB ELEVATION VIEW B-B DATE: 7-1-15 DRAWN: JWEAVER CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC CALMING TREATMENT SPEED HUMP

PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW DATE: 7-1-15 DRAWN: JWEAVER CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC CALMING TREATMENT FLAT TOP SPEED HUMP

EXISTING CURB & GUTTER NOTE: DATE: 7-1-15 DRAWN: JWEAVER CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DRIVEWAY 6' MINIMUM WIDTH PLANTING AREA REQUIRED FOR DWARF TREES 10' 7' 10' 27' EXISTING CURB TO CURB 1 DRIVEWAY 1 LANDSCAPED MEDIAN WITH CURB & GUTTER 2 3 3 FLUSH CONCRETE CURB BRICK PAVERS TRAFFIC CALMING TREATMENT LANDSCAPED MEDIAN EXISTING 24' ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 20' MINIMUM 20' MINIMUM 1 3 10' 7' 10' 60' MINIMUM BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS NO PARKING ZONE 2

DATE: 7-1-15 DRAWN: JWEAVER CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC CALMING TREATMENT ROUNDABOUT 8" HIGH RAISED CURB 1" HIGH RAISED EDGE OF CURB SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 4'-6" APPROXIMATELY 18' DIA. 17' MIN. 17' MIN. LANDSCAPED ISLAND SIDEWALKS ARE OFTEN CHANGED TO DIRECT PEDESTRIANS AWAY FROM ROUNDABOUT. SIDEWALK 30' NO PARKING ZONE TYPICAL EACH WAY 18.5' 12' PAINTED ARROW YIELD BAR AND YIELD SIGN (TYP.) SIDEWALK TRAFFIC SEPARATOR (SEE DETAIL, RIGHT) PAVEMENT GRADE 9" 6" DOUBLE YELLOW WITH RPM'S EVERY 7' TO 10' 30' MINIMUM, VARIES 5' MIN. 7' MAX. TRAFFIC SEPARATOR AND PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL 2" 4" R-1.5' EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER R-12" R-12"