Little Calumet River Rapid Response Fish Identification and Enumeration Branch Summary Report

Similar documents
Bode Lake - South Population Survey

Penny Road Pond Population Survey

Big Bend Lake Population Survey

Sag Quarry - West Population Survey

Lake St. Clair Fish Community and Fishery

Maple Lake Population Survey

Rolling Knolls Pond Population Survey

Schiller Pond Population Survey

Busse Reservoir South Lateral Pool Population Survey

SUMMARY OF CONOWINGO DAM WEST FISH LIFT OPERATIONS 2012

Tampier Lake Population Survey

O Malley s Ponds Population Survey

Wampum Lake Population Survey

Green Lake Population Survey

Investigating reproduction and abundance of bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (H. molitrix) in the Greenup pool, Ohio River

Job 1 Part JOB 1, PART 2: SUMMARY OF CONOWINGO DAM WEST FISH LIFT OPERATIONS, 2009

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Arrowhead Lake Population Survey

LAKE DIANE Hillsdale County (T8-9S, R3W, Sections 34, 3, 4) Surveyed May Jeffrey J. Braunscheidel

Introduction: JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Quemahoning Reservoir

Pickwick Lake 2018 REEL FACTS Trevor Knight Fisheries Biologist (662)

Crews collected 5,874 fish of 49 species and 1 hybrid group, which included 120 Banded Killifish (state threatened species).

JOB 1, PART 2. SUMMARY OF CONOWINGO DAM WEST FISH LIFT OPERATIONS 2011

McGinty Slough Population Survey

Delaware River Seine Survey: 2012 Sampling Summary

Thunder Bay River Assessment Appendix. Appendix 2

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

REEL FACTS. Regulations. Limblines Fishing with limblines and set hooks is prohibited at Lake Washington.

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Tunica Cutoff 2018 REEL FACTS Keith Meals Fisheries Biologist

THE LONG-TERM ILLINOIS RIVER FISH POPULATION MONITORING PROGRAM

Indiana Administrative Code Page IAC Aquaculture permit Authority: IC Affected: IC Sec. 17. (a) A person must not

The relationship between the spatial distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake

Fish Survey of Goose Lake (ID # ), Ramsey County, Minnesota in 2012

CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM

Multi jurisdictional Approach to Asian carp in the Upper Illinois River and Chicago Area Waterway System. ICAIS Niagara Falls, ON.

HOT SPRINGS VILLAGE LAKES

Fisheries Survey of White Rapids Flowage, Marinette County Wisconsin during Waterbody Identification Code

Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission Biologist Report. Wilmore Dam. Cambria County. May 2011 Trap Net, Electrofishing and Hoop Net Survey

Onondaga Lake Fishery: 2011 Fact Sheet

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

MISSISSIPPI MAKEOVER A Plan for Restoration, Just Around the Bend

Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012

MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

An Assessment of the Fish Community in Lake Acworth

Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Communities: Vulnerabilities to Climate Change and Response to Adaptation Strategies

Aquatic Plant Management and Importance to Sport Fisheries

Proposed Changes to Bag and Size Limits Minnesota/Wisconsin Border Waters of the Mississippi River

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Rat Cove and Brookwood Point littoral fish survey, 2002

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Arizona Game and Fish Department Region VI Fisheries Program

2010 Fishing Opener Prognosis. Central Region

NURSERY POND Fish Management Report. Jason C. Doll Assistant Fisheries Biologist

A SURVEY OF THE PRETTY LAKE FISH COMMUNITY, LARGEMOUTH BASS AND WALLEYE POPULATIONS AND FISH HARVEST LaGrange County 2010

Electrofishing Surveys Shed Light on Dynamic Millstone River Fishery. By Shawn Crouse, Principal Fisheries Biologist

Alcona Dam Pond Alcona County (T25N, R5E, Sections various) Surveyed June 6-12 and September 16, 2003

Ross Barnett Reservoir 2018

Fisheries Survey of Saratoga Lake

NJ DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Bureau of Freshwater Fisheries

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

BEAVER DAM LAKE Kosciusko County 2005 Fish Management Report. Angela C. Benson Assistant Biologist

Warmwater Fisheries Assessments 2014

Ross Barnett Reservoir 2019

2014 Threatened and Endangered Fish Survey of. East Loon Lake and West Loon Lake. Lake County, Illinois

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2006 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Ecosystem Monitoring Project 2014 Fish Sampling Update

Pascagoula River Marsh 2018 REEL FACTS Stephen Brown Fisheries Biologist

Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates. Chapter 22: Guidelines for Sampling Warmwater Rivers with Rotenone

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

Profile of the Current Non-Asian Carp Commercial Fishing Industry on the Illinois River

Lake Butte des Morts Commercial Seining Project Report

HUBBARD LAKE Alcona County (T27N, R7E; T28N, R7E) Surveyed May and September Tim A. Cwalinski

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2015 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 160

EVALUATION OF THE FISH COMMUNITY AND GAME FISH POPULATIONS IN SUGAR CREEK (MONTGOMERY AND PARKE COUNTIES)

RECREATIONAL PONDS AND LAKES

SKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Moon Lake 2018 REEL FACTS Nathan Aycock - Fisheries Biologist (601)

Nearshore Fish Community of Lake Michigan: 2012 Summer Assessment

Overview of Recreational Pond Management

Tips for Identifying Common Fish Species in the Bush River

Who is developing this NAAHP?

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

I. Project Title: Annual Operation and Maintenance of the Fish Passage Structure at the Government Highline Diversion Dam on the Upper Colorado River

LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Nearshore Fish Community of Lake Michigan: 2017 Summer Harbor Assessment

Spring Lake 2017 REEL FACTS Keith Meals Fisheries Biologist

Elk Lake, Antrim and Grand Traverse counties T. 28, 29 N., R. 8, 9 W., Sec. many. Lake surveys. began at 40 feet

Upper/Lower Owl Creek Reservoir

Pearl River 2018 Middle Reach REEL FACTS Dustin Rodgers Fisheries Biologist

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

Pascagoula River Marsh 2017 REEL FACTS Stephen Brown Fisheries Biologist

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Lake information report

Environmental and Economic Impacts of Asian Carps in the Illinois River

Transcription:

Little Calumet River Rapid Response Fish Identification and Enumeration Branch Summary Report Introduction A rotenone rapid response was completed on a 2.6-mile section of the Little Calumet River immediately downstream of the T. J. O Brien Lock and Control Works during May 19-28, 2010. The treatment zone measured 173 surface acres and it included the river main stem from O Brien Lock and Dam to the Beaubien Woods Forest Preserve boat launches, the mouth of the Grand Calumet River, and the Marine Services Corporation Marina. The primary purpose of the response was to determine the abundance of bighead and silver carp (Asian carp) in this portion of the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) that had previously produced multiple positive detections for Asian carp environmental DNA. The Fish Identification and Enumeration Branch processed all fish recovered during the operation. Specifically, branch workers examined all recovered fish for the presence of Asian carp and identified to species, counted and measured lengths and weights from a subsample of these fish. Data from recovered fish were then used to estimate numeric and biomass standing stocks for all species in the treatment zone. Methods Fish recovery for the rotenone application zone lasted for 6 days and it continued for an additional 3 days in the area below the downstream block net. All recovered fish were netted from boats and transported in 55-gallon drums to the fish identification station at T. J. O Brien Lock and Control Works where they were processed and loaded into plastic lined roll off dumpsters for transport to a landfill. The weight of each dumpster load was determined at the landfill and load weights were combined to provide a measure of the total weight of recovered fish. Fish processing protocol varied over the 9-day recovery period. On days 1-3 after rotenone application (May 20-23, 2010), recovered fish barrels were lifted from boats with an excavator and dumped in a 60-foot x 120-foot portable containment berm where they were sorted by species and counted. Subsamples of identified fish were measured to the nearest mm total length and weighed to the nearest gram on the first two days of recovery. In addition, abundance of unidentified small-bodied minnows was estimated during the first two days by dividing the bottom of the containment berm into square-foot sections, counting all minnows within a subsample of sections, and multiplying the average number of fish per section by the total area of the berm that contained small fish. A subsample of small fish from the berm floor (N = 1,784) was collected and preserved in jugs with formalin for later identification to species in the laboratory. Unidentified minnows were assigned to species categories based on percent composition of identified minnows in the preserved subsample. Decomposition precluded minnow counts and measurement of lengths and weights after the second day of recovery. On days 4-9 after rotenone application, barrels of recovered fish were dumped into a bobcat bucket and examined for the presence of Asian carp before being loaded into roll off dumpsters. Barrels of fish recovered from outside the rotenone application zone were tagged with brightly colored ribbon so that they could be examined for Asian carp and weighed separately from fish recovered within the application zone. No attempt was made to identify other species or count fish from outside the application zone, but a total weight was determined for these fish at the landfill. Estimates of number and weight of each species of fish recovered in the application zone were determined with data from counts of identified fish, estimates of average fish weight, and the combined mass of fish weighed at the landfill. We estimated total weights of individual fish species for the entire recovery period by calculating a weighted mean of fish weight for each species (average weight x number counted), determining the percent composition of the weighted means (weighted mean for each species divided by the sum of weighted means), and then multiplying these percentages by the total weight of recovered fish. Estimates of total numbers recovered were determined for each species by dividing species specific total weight estimates by average weights. Weights were not determined for small-bodied minnows so their numbers were not extrapolated over the entire recovery period. Estimates of minnow abundance during the first three days of recovery were considered representative of the entire recovery period because few small-bodied fishes were observed in the later days of recovery. Losses of small fish to decomposition and predation by an abundant resident gull population may explain this trend in small fish recovery.

Results The Little Calumet River near T. J. O Brien Lock and Control Works supported an abundant fish community that had high species richness. We recovered an estimated 67, 224 fish from 38 species and two hybrid groups (Table 1). These fish had a combined weight of 97,720 pounds. An additional 36,100 pounds of fish were recovered from the area outside of the treatment zone. No bighead or silver carp were recovered or observed during the operation. However, a number of other non-native taxa were sampled, including grass carp, round goby, white perch, goldfish, common carp, and alewife. In contrast, the sample included some interesting native species, such as a grass pickerel, four brown bullhead, four flathead catfish, and numerous ghost shiners. Reasonable habitat variability, decent water quality, and direct hydrologic connections with Lake Michigan may explain the observed variety of species inhabiting this reach of the river. Despite high species richness, the fish community was dominated by common carp and gizzard shad both numerically and in terms of biomass. Gizzard shad made up 33% of the number of fish sampled (rank = 1) and 20% of the weight sampled (rank = 2), whereas common carp made up 15% of the number sampled (rank = 2) and 63% of the weight sampled (rank = 1; Table 1). Other numerically abundant fish in the sample included ghost shiner (10%), emerald shiner (6%), alewife (5%), freshwater drum (5%), bluntnose minnow (4%), goldfish (3%), round goby (3%), channel catfish (3%), rock bass (2%), pumpkinseed (2%), and white perch (2%). Species with relatively high estimates of total weight included freshwater drum, channel catfish, black buffalo, goldfish, and grass carp. These species combined to make up 14% of the total weight of recovered fish. We estimated that the sampled reach of the Little Calumet River had a density of 389 fish/acre and a standing stock biomass of 565 pounds per acre. This biomass estimate is similar to farm ponds in Illinois, which typically contain 400-500 fish/acre, but well below the 1,000-2,000 pounds/acre reported for some Mississippi River backwaters. Standing stock estimates ranged from <1 fish/acre and 0.01 pounds/acre for several species to 129 fish/acre for gizzard shad and 387 pounds/acre for common carp (Table 1). Standing stock of sport fish generally was low. Estimates were highest for freshwater drum (18 fish/acre and 44 pounds/acre) and channel catfish (11 fish/acre and 14 pounds/acre), but low for largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, flathead catfish, white bass, yellow perch, white and black crappie, and other sunfish species (all <8 fish/acre and <2.5 pounds/acre). A total of 38,143 fish were counted (including estimates of minnow abundance) during the three days that fish were enumerated (Table 2). The total weight of counted fish was 47,080 pounds or 48% of the total weight of all fish recovered from the application zone. Numbers of recovered fish were lowest on the day rotenone was applied and highest on day 2 after application. There was a substantial decline in the number of fish recovered by day 3. The percent composition of each day s sample remained fairly consistent through time (Table 2), although common carp and gizzard shad were more prevalent and small-bodied fishes less prevalent on the third day of recovery. We measured total lengths of 1,469 fish and weighed 1,383 of them (Table 3). Grass carp had the largest average length and weight (34.1 inches 20.32 pounds) and this species produced the largest individual fish (43.0 inches and 39.6 pounds). Other large individuals sampled were a common carp that weighed 18.15 pounds, a flathead catfish (16.02 pounds), black buffalo (13.20 pounds), smallmouth buffalo (9.16 pounds), freshwater drum (6.13 pounds), channel catfish (5.53 pounds), gizzard shad (2.73 pounds), smallmouth bass (2.40 pounds), and largemouth bass (2.24 pounds). Populations of most sampled species also contained smaller juvenile fish (see minimum lengths, Table 3). The occurrence of juveniles suggests that successful reproduction may occur in this portion of the river or that habitat, water quality, and food resources are suitable for juvenile fish survival and growth.

Table 1. Estimated total number and percentage, total weight and percentage, and standing stock for 38 species of fish and two hybrid groups recovered from the Little Calumet River near T. J. O'Brien Lock and Dam during six days of recovery after rotenone application on May 20, 2010. Weight was not measured for most minnow and darter species. Estimated Estimated Estimated Standing Stock Total Total Number Pounds Species Number Percent Weight Percent per acre per acre Alewife 3,485 5.2 216 0.2 20 1.2 Black buffalo 205 0.3 1,424 1.5 1 8.2 Black bullhead 264 0.4 54 0.1 2 0.3 Black crappie 333 0.5 41 0.0 2 0.2 Bluegill 783 1.2 85 0.1 5 0.5 Bluntnose minnow 2,374 3.5 -- -- 14 -- Brown bullhead 8 0.0 5 0.0 0 <0.1 Channel catfish 1,959 2.9 2,481 2.5 11 14.3 Common carp 9,820 14.6 61,744 63.2 57 356.9 Emerald shiner 4,342 6.5 102 0.1 25 0.6 Fathead minnow 325 0.5 -- -- 2 -- Flathead catfish 8 <0.1 55 0.1 0 0.3 Freshwater drum 3,178 4.7 7,669 7.8 18 44.3 Ghost shiner 6,945 10.3 -- -- 40 -- Gizzard shad 22,298 33.2 19,490 19.9 129 112.7 Golden shiner 434 0.6 55 0.1 3 0.3 Goldfish 2,293 3.4 1,398 1.4 13 8.1 Goldfish x Common carp hybrid 53 0.1 138 0.1 0 0.8 Grass carp 43 0.1 873 0.9 0 5.0 Grass pickerel 2 <0.1 <1 0.0 0 <0.1 Green sunfish 49 0.1 3 0.0 0 <0.1 Hybrid sunfish 2 <0.1 <1 0.0 0 <0.1 Johnny darter 1 <0.1 -- -- 0 -- Largemouth bass 219 0.3 247 0.3 1 1.4 Orangespotted sunfish 174 0.3 2 0.0 1 <0.1 Pumpkinseed 1,098 1.6 12 0.1 6 0.7 Rock bass 1,244 1.8 391 0.4 7 2.3 Round goby 2,109 3.1 8 0.0 12 <0.1 Smallmouth bass 45 0.1 33 0.0 0 0.2 Smallmouth buffalo 12 <0.1 90 0.1 0 0.5 Spotfin shiner 464 0.7 -- -- 3 -- Spottail shiner 213 0.3 -- -- 1 -- Warmouth 18 <0.1 3 0.0 0 <0.1 White bass 82 0.1 84 0.1 0 0.5 White crappie 319 0.5 90 0.1 2 0.5 White perch 1,059 1.6 204 0.2 6 1.2 White sucker 319 0.5 306 0.3 2 1.8 Yellow bass 10 <0.1 2 0.0 0 <0.1 Yellow bullhead 366 0.5 2,56 0.3 2 1.5 Yellow perch 268 0.4 50 0.1 2 0.3 All species 67,224 97,720 389 564.9

Table 2. Number and percentages of fish recovered and counted from the Little Calumet River near T. J. O'Brien Lock and Dam during the first three days after rotenone application on May 20, 2010. Number Percent Species Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Total Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Alewife 505 1,040 159 1,704 6.7 4.8 1.8 Black buffalo 89 10 1 100 1.2 <0.1 <0.1 Black bullhead 23 56 50 129 0.3 0.3 0.6 Black crappie 24 93 46 163 0.3 0.4 0.5 Bluegill 101 106 176 383 1.3 0.5 2.0 Bluntnose minnow 170 2,168 36 2,374 2.3 10.0 0.4 Brown bullhead 3 1 0 4 <0.1 0.0 0.0 Channel catfish 92 426 440 958 1.2 2.0 4.9 Common carp 2,088 1,215 1,498 4,801 27.7 5.6 16.6 Emerald shiner 186 1,893 44 2,123 2.5 8.8 0.5 Fathead minnow 27 293 5 325 0.4 1.4 0.1 Flathead catfish 4 0 0 4 0.1 0.0 0.0 Freshwater drum 381 1,045 128 1,554 5.1 4.8 1.4 Ghost shiner 54 6,786 105 6,945 0.7 31.5 1.2 Gizzard shad 2,861 2,667 5,374 10,902 38.0 12.4 59.4 Golden shiner 86 108 18 212 1.1 0.5 0.2 Goldfish 37 709 375 1,121 0.5 3.3 4.1 Goldfish x Common carp hybrid 9 16 1 26 0.1 0.1 <0.1 Grass carp 21 0 0 21 0.3 0.0 0.0 Grass pickerel 1 0 0 1 <0.1 0.0 0.0 Green sunfish 16 1 7 24 0.2 0.0 0.1 Hybrid sunfish 1 0 0 1 <0.1 0.0 0.0 Johnny darter 0 0 1 1 0.0 <0.1 <0.1 Largemouth bass 63 17 27 107 0.8 0.1 0.3 Orangespotted sunfish 9 70 6 85 0.1 0.3 0.1 Pumpkinseed 178 251 108 537 2.4 1.2 1.2 Rock bass 83 450 75 608 1.1 2.1 0.8 Round goby 122 875 34 1,031 1.6 4.1 0.4 Smallmouth bass 12 8 2 22 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 Smallmouth buffalo 1 4 1 6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Spotfin shiner 8 449 7 464 0.1 2.08 0.1 Spottail shiner 2 204 7 213 <0.1 0.95 0.1 Warmouth 6 0 3 9 0.1 0.00 <0.1 White bass 28 5 7 40 0.4 <0.1 0.1 White crappie 29 70 57 156 0.4 0.32 0.6 White perch 89 341 88 518 1.2 1.58 1.0 White sucker 67 32 57 156 0.9 0.15 0.6 Yellow bass 5 0 0 5 0.1 0.00 0.0 Yellow bullhead 30 56 93 179 0.4 0.26 1.0 Yellow perch 17 102 12 131 0.2 0.47 0.1 All species 7,528 21,567 9,048 38,143

Table 3. Mean, minimum, and maximum total lengths and weights for a subsample of fish recovered from the Little Calumet River near T. J. O'Brien Lock and Dam during the first two days after rotenone application on May 20, 2010. Mean Minimum Maximum total total total Mean Minimum Maximum Number length length length Number weight weight weight Species measured (inches) (inches) (inches) weighed (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) Alewife 24 6.3 5.5 7.0 24 0.06 0.04 0.11 Black buffalo 74 23.1 18.4 29.3 74 6.96 1.73 13.20 Black bullhead 46 6.9 5.2 12.6 46 0.20 0.07 0.93 Black crappie 83 5.7 2.6 9.6 79 0.12 0.01 0.45 Bluegill 79 4.9 1.3 8.0 76 0.11 0.00 0.39 Bluntnose minnow 8 2.8 1.3 4.3 0 -- -- -- Brown bullhead 3 10.6 9.6 12.2 3 0.66 0.37 1.02 Channel catfish 76 13.5 5.0 23.0 76 1.27 0.01 5.53 Common carp 103 21.9 9.7 29.6 103 6.29 0.67 18.15 Emerald shiner 11 3.4 1.1 4.6 3 0.02 0.02 0.03 Fathead minnow 8 2.1 1.6 2.9 0 -- -- -- Flathead catfish 4 23.0 17.7 32.4 4 6.76 2.20 16.02 Freshwater drum 51 16.3 12.9 20.9 51 2.41 0.98 6.13 Ghost shiner 16 1.9 1.1 2.5 0 -- -- -- Gizzard shad 81 11.8 4.0 19.0 80 0.87 0.03 2.73 Golden shiner 54 6.2 2.0 8.4 49 0.13 0.02 0.24 Goldfish 61 8.9 4.8 13.2 61 0.61 0.15 2.09 Goldfish x Common carp hybrid 9 15.3 7.9 19.0 9 2.59 0.30 4.78 Grass carp 21 34.1 25.6 43.0 21 20.32 8.25 39.60 Grass pickerel 1 7.9 7.9 7.9 1 0.10 0.10 0.10 Green sunfish 16 4.2 3.3 5.9 16 0.06 0.03 0.13 Hybrid sunfish 1 5.1 5.1 5.1 1 0.09 0.09 0.09 Johnny darter 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- -- Largemouth bass 51 12.6 3.5 16.1 51 1.13 0.02 2.24 Orangespotted sunfish 30 2.6 1.3 3.7 24 0.01 0.00 0.04 Pumpkinseed 91 4.9 1.8 7.5 90 0.11 0.00 0.35 Rock bass 76 6.7 1.7 10.2 72 0.31 0.03 0.63 Round goby 8 2.7 1.6 4.4 0 -- -- -- Smallmouth bass 20 10.3 4.1 16.9 20 0.73 0.02 2.40 Smallmouth buffalo 5 23.1 21.4 25.2 5 7.33 5.76 9.16 Spotfin shiner 8 2.9 1.7 4.1 0 -- -- -- Spottail shiner 4 4.4 3.0 5.4 0 -- -- -- Warmouth 6 5.5 4.4 7.0 6 0.16 0.06 0.32 White bass 26 12.6 10.1 15.2 26 1.03 0.46 1.86 White crappie 75 8.1 2.7 10.7 74 0.28 0.01 0.66 White perch 51 6.7 1.3 9.1 50 0.19 0.01 0.41 White sucker 66 13.3 5.2 19.1 66 0.96 0.06 2.50 Yellow bass 5 6.6 3.5 8.6 5 0.19 0.02 0.45 Yellow bullhead 58 10.1 4.9 13.2 58 0.70 0.09 1.45 Yellow perch 59 7.5 3.9 9.9 59 0.19 0.02 0.51 Grand Total 1,469 1,383

Participating Organizations The Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR, with support from the Monitoring and Rapid Response (MRR) workgroup of the Regional Coordinating Committee (RCC), implemented the Asian Carp Rapid Response Plan (RRP) to take the necessary actions along the Little Calumet River. In addition, local organizations, federal and state agencies, non governmental agencies (NGO), and industry stakeholders were on hand to assist (IDNR) in order to ensure a successful operation. LOCAL Cook County Forest Preserve District (CCFPD) OTHER Commercial Fishermen STATE Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IN DNR) Tetra Tech EM Inc. SET Environmental Carus, Inc. Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) FEDERAL U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) NON-GOVERNMENT American Red Cross of Greater Chicago (ARCGC) Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS)

Response Participants No. of Personnel Responding field personnel 310 Command and ICP Staff 50-60 Agency observers/visitors onsite 25-35 Information from: OPERATION PELICAN: ASIAN CARP RAPID RESPONSE May 20 through May 27, 2010 Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes National Program Office, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Submitted by Tetra Tech EM Inc. 1 South Wacker Drive, 37th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 September 2010 7