CIES Football Observatory Monthly Report Issue 28 - October 2017 Performance and playing styles in 35 European football leagues Drs Raffaele Poli, Loïc Ravenel and Roger Besson 1. Introduction The analysis of pitch performances at both individual and collective level is one of the three principle fields of research of the CIES Football Observatory. The 28th edition of our Monthly Report compares 35 national competitions across Europe using the database made available by the InStat company. The sample comprises 19,544 matches played between the 1st September 2015 and the 31st August 2017. The analysis focuses on three aspects: the teams ball management, the degree of openness of games, as well as the level of power balance between opponents. For each of these domains, we present statistical indicators that permit the ranking of leagues on a pertinent and objective basis. Figure 1: sample of leagues and number of matches analysed Association League Name Matches Austria AUT Bundesliga 355 Belgium BEL First Division A 556 Belarus BLR Premier League 454 Bulgaria BUL First League 417 Croatia CRO 1. HNL 354 Czech Rep. CZE Czech Liga 480 Denmark DEN Superliga 448 England ENG Premier League 750 ENG/D2 Championship 1'115 Spain ESP Liga 760 ESP/D2 Segunda División 935 Finland FIN Veikkausliiga 393 France FRA Ligue 1 758 FRA/D2 Ligue 2 760 Germany GER Bundesliga 603 GER/D2 2. Bundesliga 604 Greece GRE Super League 500 Hungary HUN NB I 395 Israel ISR Ligat ha'al 424 Italy ITA Serie A 760 ITA/D2 Serie B 964 Netherlands NED Eredivisie 615 Norway NOR Eliteserien 462 Poland POL Ekstraklasa 592 Portugal POR Primeira Liga 556 Romania ROM Liga I 529 Russia RUS Premier League 488 Scotland SCO Premiership 421 Serbia SRB Super Liga 571 Switzerland SUI Super League 354 Slovakia SVK Super Liga 377 Slovenia SVN 1. SNL 350 Sweden SWE Allsvenskan 470 Turkey TUR Süper Lig 612 Ukraine UKR Premier League 362 1
2. Ball management The first indicator used when comparing leagues from the point of view of ball management is that of the percentage of successful passes. A high value indicates the ability of a team to retain possession of the ball. This indicator notably refers to the technical prowess of players, the pass distance, the playing style, as well as the pressure on the footballers who have possession. The five major European leagues ranks among the first seven places. The ranking of the Swedish (3rd) and the Israeli (4th) top divisions is surprising, given the relatively modest results obtained by their representatives in European competitions. As illustrated in figure 3, the level of pressure on the player with possession partially explains this result. As for Israel, the lack of verticality is also to be considered (figures 4 and 5). Generally speaking, the most competitive championships bring together players with superior technical skills and are made up of more clubs whose philosophy of the game is based on possession. Portugal and Ukraine are the only two countries in the top ten places of the UEFA rankings whose level of successful passes is below 80%. As shown in tables 6 and 7, this result must be considered in parallel with the low level of competitive balance in these championships. Figure 2: % of successful passes, by league 1. ITA 82.4%. HUN 79.6% 2. FRA 82.2% 20. POL 79.3% 3. SWE 82.0% 21. FRA/D2 79.2% 4. ISR 81.8%. ITA/D2 79.2% 5. ENG 81.4% 23. POR 79.1% 6. ESP 81.2%. NOR 79.1% 7. GER 81.1% 25. SVN 78.9% 8. RUS 81.0% 26. SRB 78.6% 9. TUR 80.6% 27. BLR 78.4% 10. NED 80.5%. GER/D2 78.4%. DEN 80.5%. ENG/D2 78.4% 12. CRO 80.2% 30. GRE 78.3% 13. BEL 80.1% 31. SVK 77.7% 14. BUL 80.0% 32. ESP/D2 77.6%. FIN 80.0%. AUT 77.6% 16. SUI 79.9% 34. SCO 77.2% 17. ROM 79.7%. CZE 77.2% 18. UKR 79.6% Average 79.7% 2
The level of successful passes is reflected, by and large, on the average length of a phase of possession. The values for this indicator vary between less than 12 seconds for the Czech 1. Liga and 15 seconds for the English Premier League. As a general rule, the phases of possession last longer in the best performing championships than in lesser competitive leagues. The indicator of the number of successful passes per minute of possession is also interesting when it comes to understanding the rapidity of ball circulation. The five major European leagues are in this case in the top five positions. Big-5 league teams are not only able to achieve a greater proportion of passes than the average, but are also able to execute them in a speedier manner. The relatively lower level of passes per minute measured for the Swedish and Israeli top divisions in comparison to the percentage of successful passes probably reflects a lesser need to quickly pass the ball around in order to undo the opponents defensive game. The same conclusion is valid for the Dutch Eredivisie and the Belgian Pro League. Figure 3: number of passes per minute of possession, by league 1. GER 18.21 19. CZE 17.56 2. FRA 18.17. ROM 17.56 3. ITA 18.12. ITA/D2 17.56 4. ESP 17.91 22. GRE 17.50. ENG 17.91. ENG/D2 17.50 6. POL 17.90 24. HUN 17.46 7. RUS 17.88 25. SVN 17.43 8. AUT 17.83 26. POR 17.38 9. GER/D2 17.76 27. ESP/D2 17.35 10. TUR 17.70 28. SCO 17.33 11. DEN 17.68 29. BEL 17.28 12. SUI 17.67 30. ISR 17.24 13. SVK 17.65 31. BUL 17.17 14. BLR 17.63 32. FIN 17.07. CRO 17.63 33. NOR 17.04 16. UKR 17.58 34. NED 16.90. FRA/D2 17.58 35. SRB 16.69 18. SWE 17.57 Average 17.55 3
3. Degree of openness The second area analysed is the degree of openness of matches. The number of goals scored is a simple but useful indicator to measure the balance of power between attack and defence according to league. Here also, the gaps observed show up divergences both in the abilities of players and the playing philosophies of teams. The imbalance between clubs can also explain some differences (see next chapter). The number of goals per match in the competitions studied varies between 2.24 for the Spanish Segunda División and 3.16 for the Swiss Super League. The most open championships locate in Western Europe. The Eastern European league whose teams score the most goals, the Slovakian top division, is only ranked twelfth. The five second division championships analysed are in the second half of the rankings. The big-5 leagues are, on the contrary, in the top half of the table. Figure 4: number of goals per match, by league 1. SUI 3.16 19. GER/D2 2.56 2. NED 2.98 20. POR 2.53 3. SWE 2.94 21. SVN 2.52 4. BEL 2.86 22. ENG/D2 2.51. ESP 2.86 23. BUL 2.50 6. SCO 2.84 24. UKR 2.48 7. GER 2.83 25. FIN 2.45 8. NOR 2.81 26. SRB 2.44 9. ITA 2.77 27. FRA/D2 2.42 10. ENG 2.75 28. ROM 2.37 11. DEN 2.71 29. BLR 2.35. TUR 2.71 30. CRO 2.34 13. SVK 2.68 31. ITA/D2 2.33 14. POL 2.66 32. ISR 2.30 15. AUT 2.65 33. RUS 2.28 16. FRA 2.61 34. GRE 2.25 17. HUN 2.58 35. ESP/D2 2.24. CZE 2.58 Average 2.60 4
The indicator for the actual playing time per goal also allows us to evaluate the degree of openness of matches. At one extreme, in the Swiss Super League, a goal is scored every 16 17 of effective play. At the other, one must wait 23 32 to see a goal in Israel. The average for the 35 competitions analysed is 20 32. Generally, the duration of actual play is higher in the most competitive championships than in the lesser performing leagues. This result reflects a greater fluidity of the game. The average effective playing time for the competitions analysed is 55.6%, with a minimum of 51.5% in Portugal and a maximum of 59.6% in Sweden. Figure 5: effective playing time per goal, by league (minutes) 1. SUI 16:17 19. HUN 20:18 2. SCO 18:14 20. BUL 20:32 3. BEL 18:47 21. FRA 20:46 4. NED 18:48 22. UKR 20:56 5. ESP 18:50 23. SVN 20:59 6. GER 18:52 24. ENG/D2 21:25 7. NOR 19:07 25. ROM 21:34. SVK 19:07 26. SRB 21:59 9. TUR 19:11 27. FRA/D2 22:02 10. CZE 19:19 28. FIN 22:15 11. POR 19:30 29. ITA/D2 22:22 12. POL 19:35 30. ESP/D2 22:48. SWE 19:35. GRE 22:48 14. AUT 19:40 32. CRO 22:54 15. GER/D2 19:47 33. BLR 23:18 16. ENG 19:51 34. RUS 23:29 17. ITA 20:05 35. ISR 23:32 18. DEN 20:14 Average 20:32 5
4. Balance of power The championships also differentiate greatly in the power balance between adversaries. Beyond goals scored by each team, the gaps in the number of shots from within the opponents box and in the number of passes achieved are two technical indicators allowing us to grasp the differences in the pitch production between adversaries. The most competitive teams not only shoot more often than lesser performing teams, but also are capable of shooting from a closer range. The difference in the number of shots from within the opponents box is thus a particularly relevant indicator when measuring the power balance between teams. At the level of the 35 competitions analysed, the gaps per match vary between 3.5 shots in the German Zweite Bundesliga and 5.1 shots in the Croatian top division. More generally, the second divisions of the five major European championships emerge as particularly evenly matched competitions. The low level of openness measured above is in part linked to this observation. With the exception of the French Ligue 1, the big-5 competitions are part of the most unbalanced championships. While the general level of players is very high, the great differences between the financial means at the disposal of teams reflects in the dominance of certain clubs. Croatia, Ukraine and the Netherlands are in a similar situation. Figure 6: average gap between shots from within the opponents box, by league 1. CRO 5.11. FIN 4.21 2. UKR 4.96 20. BUL 4.14 3. NED 4.94 21. SVN 4.13 4. SWE 4.63. NOR 4.13 5. ENG 4.56 23. HUN 4.12 6. SVK 4.55 24. ISR 4.08 7. SUI 4.54 25. TUR 4.05 8. POR 4.53 26. FRA 3.95 9. BLR 4.52. AUT 3.95. SCO 4.52 28. RUS 3.88 11. ITA 4.49 29. ROM 3.85 12. CZE 4.40. ITA/D2 3.85 13. ESP 4.37 31. POL 3.83 14. SRB 4.35 32. ENG/D2 3.74 15. BEL 4.34 33. FRA/D2 3.71 16. GRE 4.32 34. ESP/D2 3.64 17. DEN 4.25 35. GER/D2 3.51 18. GER 4.21 Average 4.24 6
The average gap of passes carried out by teams confirms the great balance existing in the second divisions of big-5 league countries. At the other end of the scale, this indicator highlights even more the five major European championships as being among the most unbalanced competitions from the point of view of the teams technical production. While a significantly positive correlation exists at team level between passes and shots, the link is not always very strong. Thus, the gaps between passes measured in the German, French, Israeli or Russian top divisions only marginally explain the gaps between shots. In this case, while still important, possession is not a key success factor. Figure 7: average gap of passes between adversaries per match, by league 1. GER 195. ROM 143 2. UKR 179 20. BEL 140 3. ENG 176 21. FIN 138 4. ISR 174 22. SWE 137 5. SVK 168 23. SRB 136 6. ITA 166. BLR 136 7. FRA 165 25. POL 135 8. RUS 164 26. TUR 129 9. CRO 163 27. NOR 128 10. POR 158 28. SVN 127. ESP 158 29. ENG/D2 126 12. AUT 157 30. GER/D2 124 13. GRE 156 31. CZE 121 14. SCO 151 32. SUI 119 15. BUL 149 33. FRA/D2 113 16. NED 145. ITA/D2 113 17. DEN 144 35. ESP/D2 103 18. HUN 143 Average 145 7
5. Conclusion This Monthly Report is but an initial foray in exploiting the numerous possibilities available thanks to the new collaboration between the CIES Football Observatory and InStat. The depth and breadth of data produced by this company constitutes a solid basis for many future research projects. In terms of performance analysis, the greatest difficulty resides in the ability to interpret data taking into account the particularities of the context from which they arise. The principle conclusion that we can draw here is that the top leagues differentiate themselves above all by the fluidity of games, as illustrated by the highest level of successful passes and the quickest ball circulation. However, a better overall capacity to master the ball does not necessarily lead to more goals. The power balance between opponents and the playing philosophy of teams have the most determining role in the number of goals scored. An unbalanced championship with an attacking mentality will lead to more goals than an evenly matched competition with a defensive approach. The gaps observed between the top and second divisions in the big-5 league countries largely underwrite this observation. 8