BODY FORM INFLUENCES ON THE DRAG EXPERIENCED BY JUNIOR SWIMMERS. Australia, Perth, Australia

Similar documents
Morphology and Hydrodynamic Resistance in Young Swimmers

SIMULTANEOUS RECORDINGS OF VELOCITY AND VIDEO DURING SWIMMING

A New Index of Coordination for the Crawl: Description and Usefulness

Comparison of Active Drag Using the MRT-Method and the MAD-System in Front Crawl Swimming

The effect of deliberate practice on the technique of national calibre swimmers

The relationship between different age swimmers flip turn temporal and kinematic characteristics

The Effect of Tether Speed on Muscle Activation and Recruitment Patterns

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THE EFFICIENY OF THE START TECHNIQUES IN THE ROMANIAN COMPETITIVE SWIMMING

APPROACH RUN VELOCITIES OF FEMALE POLE VAULTERS

Underwater stroke kinematics during breathing and breath-holding front crawl swimming

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM COMPETITION ANALYSIS AT THE 1999 PAN PACIFIC SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS?

The effect of cognitive intervention on stroke distance in age-group swimmers

A model for active drag force exogenous variables in young swimmers

TECHNOLOGY FOR DECREASING ACTIVE DRAG AT THE MAXIMAL SWIMMING VELOCITY

The Effects of Specific Drills on the Flip Turns of Freestyle Swimmers Based on a Kinesiology Analysis

A Comparison of American Red Cross- and YMCA-Preferred Approach Methods Used to Rescue Near-Drowning Victims

Jodi M. Cossor and Bruce R. Mason Australian lnstitute of Sport Biomechanics Department, Canberra, Australia

The relationship between front crawl swimming performance and hydrodynamic variables during leg kicking in age group swimmers

The Influence of Different Hand Paddle Size on 100-m Front Crawl Kinematics

INTERACTION OF STEP LENGTH AND STEP RATE DURING SPRINT RUNNING

Properties of Water Affect Locomotion

THE TECHNICAL ECONOMY INDEX: A tool for cyclic sports

Key words: biomechanics, injury, technique, measurement, strength, evaluation

Differences in Stroke Phases, Arm-Leg Coordination and Velocity Fluctuation due to Event, Gender and Performance Level in Breaststroke

ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher

SLS States, Coaches and team managers / SLSA Membership Australian Pool Rescue Championships New Age Group Categories Modifications

Resistance to Fatigue and Success in Competitive Swimming. Steven C. Myers, Los Alamos High School Jake A. Bailey, University of Northern Colorado

EVALUATING THE TECHNICAL RACE COMPONENTS DURING THE TRAINING SEASON

Simulation analysis of the influence of breathing on the performance in breaststroke

The 3-Peak Backstroke

University of Kassel Swim Start Research

Analysis of wall shear stress around a competitive swimmer using 3D Navier Stokes equations in CFD

DETERMINANT FACTORS RELATED TO PERFORMANCE IN YOUNG SWIMMERS

Stroke Rate & Stroke Count In The Daily Training Environment. Mike Parker England Programmes Officer & Open Water Technical Lead

Effectively Improving Technique of Developing Swimmers. Ryan Atkison, MSc, CSCS Sport Biomechanist Canadian Sport Institute Ontario

Relationship between Passive Drag and IPC Swimming Class

Coaching Applications. Maturational Timing and Swim Performance in Collegiate Female Swimmers

CRNOGORSKA SPORTSKA AKADEMIJA, Sport Mont časopis br. 43,44,45.

Relationship Between Glide Speed and Olympic Cross-Country Ski Performance

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 112 (2015 )

How does buoyancy influence front-crawl performance? Exploring the assumptions

front crawl Published in associa on with swim-teach.com

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 112 (2015 )

ESTABLISHING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS MODELS FOR SWIMMING TECHNIQUE ASSESSMENT

Analysis of stroke technique using acceleration sensor IC in freestyle swimming

Crawley, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA; 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA

International Journal for Life Sciences and Educational Research. School of Physical Education, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India

ISBS '99 : XVII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports, June 30-July 6, 1999, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia: Swimming

Australia. Australia

Impact Points and Their Effect on Trajectory in Soccer

THE INFLUENCE OF FOOTBALL BOOT CONSTRUCTION ON BALL VELOCITY AND DEFORMATION. Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia

A Study on Roll Damping of Bilge Keels for New Non-Ballast Ship with Rounder Cross Section

A KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE BREAK-OUT PHASE OF THE FREESTYLE, BACKSTROKE, AND BUTTERFLY SWIMMING STROKES

Hockey Scholars: Math and Science Test Study Guide-Answer Key

The effects of a suspended-load backpack on gait

Searching for criteria in evaluating the monofin swimming turn from the perspective of coaching and improving technique

Ground Forces Impact on Release of Rotational Shot Put Technique

AERODYNAMICS AND MICROSTRUCTURE STUDY OF DIANA SUBMARINE SWIMSUIT

Team /08/2016. Report What is the fastest humanly possible time for the Olympic 100m freestyle event? Summary

Swimming Stroke Mechanics

A Comparative Study of Running Agility, Jumping Ability and Throwing Ability among Cricket Players

Evaluation of Arm-LegCoordination in Flat Breaststroke

Weightlifting for Improved Swimming Performance University of Michigan Strength and Conditioning - Olympic Sports

The Mechanics of Modern BREASTSTROKE Swimming Dr Ralph Richards

Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace

Variation of Nordic Classic Ski Characteristics from Norwegian national team athletes

The Effect of a Seven Week Exercise Program on Golf Swing Performance and Musculoskeletal Screening Scores

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON RESPIRATORY PARAMETERS BETWEEN SHORT DISTANCE AND LONG DISTANCE SWIMMERS

At What Extent Physical Training Can Minimize Gender Differences in Male and Female Trained Swimmers? - A Comparative Analysis

Development of a Simulation Model for Swimming with Diving Fins

Swimming practical examination support materials

Journal of Human Sport and Exercise E-ISSN: Universidad de Alicante España

Sex Differences in Growth and Performance of Track and Field Athletes Years

RESISTIVE FORCES AND TECHNIQUE ANALYSIS IN FRONT CRAWL SPRINT SWIMMING

2) Jensen, R. Comparison of ground-reaction forces while kicking a stationary and non-stationary soccer ball

Aerobic Cost in Elite Female Adolescent Swimmers

THREE DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS OF THE DIRECT FREE KICK IN SOCCER WHEN OPPOSED BY A DEFENSIVE WALL

Return this cover page with the test.

Chapter I examines the anthropometric and physiological factors that. determine success in sport. More specifically it discusses the somatotype

Chapter # 08 Waves. [WAVES] Chapter # 08

Validation of a Step Test in Children Ages 7-11

KINEMATIC PARAMETERS OF BASKETBALL JUMP SHOTS PROJECTED FROM VARYING DISTANCES. M. N. Satern. Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas, USA

Generating Power in the Pool: An Analysis of Strength Conditioning and its Effect on Athlete Performance

Swimming Breaststroke Checklist Marion Alexander, Yumeng Li, Adam Toffan, Biomechanics Lab, U of Manitoba

Let s Revise the Basics Part 3 Note from the Editor: In forthcoming issues of our magazine we will use this section as a reminder of the basic

Skill Acquisition and Injury Prevention. Rod Havriluk, Ph.D. Swimming Technology Research

Introduction. o 2. ! "#$ % & ' (" 4 Watt/m 2. Major

THE BALLISTIC PENDULUM

Competitive Performance of Elite Olympic-Distance Triathletes: Reliability and Smallest Worthwhile Enhancement

Implementing Provisions for Art. 411 of the ICR Ski Jumping

Estimating the Trunk Transverse Surface Area to Assess Swimmer s Drag Force Based on their Competitive Level

Coefficients of Restitution of Balls Used in Team Sports for the Visually Impaired

TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE JAVELIN THROW

Monitoring of performance an training in rowers

The Optimal Downhill Slope for Acute Overspeed Running

Despite the high speeds that can be reached using

The physical demands of Super 14 rugby union

The student will be able to bob ten times without holding their nose. float on their stomach and back for a minimum of ten seconds.

Improving the Serving Motion in a Volleyball Game: A Design of Experiment Approach

Preview. Vibrations and Waves Section 1. Section 1 Simple Harmonic Motion. Section 2 Measuring Simple Harmonic Motion. Section 3 Properties of Waves

Transcription:

1 BODY FORM INFLUENCES ON THE DRAG EXPERIENCED BY JUNIOR SWIMMERS Andrew Lyttle 1, Nat Benjanuvatra 2, Brian A Blanksby 2, Bruce C Elliott 2 1 Western Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, Australia 2 Department of Human Movement and Exercise Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Morphology and hydrodynamic drag were measured of 6 males and 6 females, from each of the 9, 11 and 13 yr age groups. Net forces were examined when towing swimmers while prone streamlined gliding and flutter kicking at 1.3 to 2.5 ms -1. The passive drag force at 1.9, 2.2 and 2.5 ms -1 increased with age and anthropometry, but no changes were found at 1.3 and 1.6 ms -1. Stepwise regression revealed passive drag best predicted net active drag at velocities of 1.3, 1.9, 2.2 and 2.5 ms -1. Results supported the Froude number theory that increased height will reduce wave-making drag. Keywords: hydrodynamic drag, morphology, streamlined gliding, swimming. INTRODUCTION Swimming is the interaction of propulsive and resistive forces. Understanding the relationship between human morphology and hydrodynamic resistance enables coaches to modify swimming strokes to improve performance. Total drag can be quantified with the body in a fixed position (passive drag), or while in motion (active drag). Studies of hydrodynamic resistance (both passive and active drag) and body anthropometry have produced varying results (Clarys,1978; Huijing et al.,1988). Generally, research has found that anthropometry influences passive drag, except for body surface area (Chatard et al.,1990; Lyttle et al.,1998). However, the link between morphology and active drag also has yielded contrasting results (Huijing et al.,1988; Kolmogorov et al.,1997). Huijing et al. (1988) found significant correlations between anthropometry and active drag, particularly maximal body cross-sectional area, but others has indicated that swimming mechanics, rather than body dimensions, have a greater influence on active drag. Toussaint et al. (1990) examined the effects of growth on active drag in swimmers. They used the MAD system to longitudinally measure the change in active drag of children during front crawl swimming at 1.25 ms -1 over a 2.5 year period. Despite an 11% increase in height, 37% increase in mass and 16% increase in the body cross-sectional area, no differences were found in active drag at the above velocity. They suggested that the lack of change in active drag was due to a height increase. Theoretically, this reduced the wave drag component of the total drag in accordance with the Froude theory (Toussaint et al.,1990). That is, reduced wave-making resistance appeared to offset any increases in form and frictional drag. However, research has also shown that active drag is affected by swimming technique (Kolmogorov et al.,1997). Thus, changes in the stroke mechanics, skill and streamlining ability could have contributed to the lack of change in total drag found in the swimmers after 2.5 years of training and growth (Touissant et al.,1990). This cross sectional study examined whether drag force was influenced by anthropometry, age, gender and kicking performance. METHODS Six males and 6 females aged 9, 11 and 13 years, participated in the study. Height and mass measures were within +1 standard deviation (SD) from the anthropometric means of Western Australian school children. Selected anthropometric variables were recorded and a maximal 25 m freestyle flutter kick time was recorded as a performance measure. Subjects were towed along the surface of a 25 m pool at 1.3, 1.6, 1.9, 2.2 and 2.5 ms -1 while performing a prone streamlined glide and freestyle flutter kick at each velocity. Net force in the streamlined glide condition represented the resistance to towing the swimmer along the pool (passive drag) while the net force in the kicking trials was the interaction of the total resistance of the swimmer and the propulsive force created by the kick (total resistance minus propulsive

2 force). Figure 1 outlines the experimental set-up and further details can be found in Lyttle et al. (1999). An underwater video camera, perpendicular to the swimmer s motion, ensured that the desired body position was maintained throughout the trial. F M T r a n s m itte r V id e o r e c o rd e r a n d m o n ito r U n d e r w a te r V id e o C a m e r a F M R e c e iv e r F o rc e d a ta c o lle c tio n c o m p u te r M e c h a n ic a l w i n c h P u lle y S y s te m S w i m m e r L o a d C e ll & A m p li fie r s Figure 1: Schema of the experimental set-up for quantifying net forces. RESULTS A MANOVA revealed differences in the selected anthropometric variables between the three age groups (F = 11.877, p < 1). Males and females were also different across ages (F = 2.516, p < 5), but the age/gender interaction was not significant (F = 0.886, p = 0.58). A follow-up ANOVA examined each variable for each age group to ascertain the differences between males and females. The only significant gender difference was height for the 11 year olds (girls: mean = 151.48 + 3.04 cm; boys: 147.37 + 1.49 cm; F = 8.876, p < 5). Force Analysis The net force results are illustrated in Figure 2 for passive condition and in Figure 3 for active condition. A four way repeated measures MANOVA examined the differences in the net forces between the towing conditions, age groups and gender. Significant interactions were recorded between age groups and velocity (F = 9.353, p < 1), and between age groups and towing condition (F = 17.199, p < 1). However, the three way interaction between velocity, towing condition and age group was not significant (F = 0.929, p = 0.45). P o o l Net force (N) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 9 Year 11Year 13 Year Net force (N) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 9 Year 11 Year 13 Year Figure 2: Mean net force during streamlined glide condition for the 9, 11 and 13 year age groups (n=12 per group) Figure 3: Mean net force during flutter kick condition for the 9, 11 and 13 year age groups (n=12 per group)

3 The repeated measures MANOVA revealed no significant interaction effect for gender and any of the independent variables. However, tests of between-subjects effects revealed gender differences in the net force recorded (F = 7.436, p < 5). The repeated measure ANOVAs were conducted individually for each of the age groups and towing conditions to identify the age groups with a significant gender difference. Significant differences between Net Force Difference (N) 14.0 12.0 1 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 9 11 13 P <.05 Figure 4: Gender comparison of the net force during the streamlined glide of each age group (Net force for boys minus net force for the girls). gender occurred only in the 11 year age group where the girls created lower net drag forces than the boys in the streamlined glide condition (F = 10.193, p < 5) (Figure 4). Also, repeated measure ANOVAs found no significant interaction between gender and velocity, in the net force of both active and passive towing conditions in all age groups. The net forces from the passive and active conditions were compared via a four way repeated measures MANOVA. This revealed significant differences between the two conditions (F = 7.033, p < 5), as well as a significant velocity and towing condition interaction (F = 58.614, p < 1). Relationships Between the Net Forces and the Anthropometric Variables Both height and 25 m flutter kick time correlated significantly with most anthropometric variables and net forces. Partial correlations were constructed with the effects of height and 25 m kick time held constant. Generally, the partial correlations revealed that no common variance was shared at 1.3 and 1.6 ms -1. However, at higher velocities, body indices and anthropometry correlated significantly with the flutter kick and streamlined glide. Stepwise Multiple Regression Stepwise multiple regression equations were developed to determine the best predictors of the net forces at each of the velocities in both the gliding and kicking conditions of the whole group (N = 36). At 1.3 and 1.6 ms -1, no regression equations could be computed for passive condition. Body mass was the best single predictor of the net force at 1.9, 2.2 and 2.5 ms -1. Passive drag at the faster velocities best predicted the net forces during the flutter kick. DISCUSSION Age differences in net forces for the streamlined glide condition Lower velocities of 1.3 and 1.6 ms -1 revealed similar drag values across the age groups. However, as the velocity increased, the 9 year old group recorded significantly lower drag forces than the 11 and the 13 year olds. At 2.2 ms -1, the three age groups differed significantly from one another with the 13 year age group recording the greatest amount of passive drag. Toussaint et al. (1990) reported no change in active drag of young swimmers when swimming front crawl at 1.25 ms -1 after a 2.5 year period, despite significant height (17 cm) and mass (14.7 kg) increases. They considered that increased height decreased the Froude number and reduced the wave-making drag component. This compensated for any increased frictional and form drag created by a larger body surface and cross sectional areas. No net changes in the drag force implied that the three age groups in the current study should record similar levels of passive drag. This was the case at the lower velocities of 1.3 and 1.6 ms -1, but not at the higher velocities.

4 Passive drag force at 1.9, 2.2 and 2.5 ms -1 was significantly and positively correlated with the anthropometric variables except for sum of skinfolds. This agreed with other hydrodynamic studies that showed passive drag was highly influenced by body morphology (Clarys, 1978). Thus, at the higher velocities, differences in passive drag between the three age groups were due to increased body dimensions. However, it remains unclear as to why there was no significant difference at 1.3 and 1.6 ms -1. Frictional drag increases linearly with velocity, form drag increases with the square of the velocity and wave drag varies with the cube of velocity (Rushall et al., 1994). Therefore, 1.3 and 1.6 ms -1 might be too slow for body morphology to substantially influence passive drag. Gender differences in the net force during a streamline glide There was no gender difference between the passive drag of 9 and 13 year olds, but the mean passive drag of the 11 year old girls was significantly less than that of the 11 year old boys. While the 9 and 13 year old boys and girls were similar in all of the selected anthropometric variables, the 11 year old girls were significantly taller than the 11 year old boys (151.5 & 147.4 cm for girls & boys, respectively). As the other anthropometric variables for 11 year olds were similar across gender, the greater height of the girls was likely to be associated with reduced wave-making resistance. Similarity in all other anthropometric variables could lead one to assume that the frictional and form drag components also were similar. Relationship Between Anthropometry and Passive Drag At 1.3 and 1.6 ms -1, this study agreed with Toussaint et al. (1990) that increased growth did not significantly influence drag. However, at the higher velocities, the increased body size with age also increased drag. Measures of slenderness, such as the Ponderal Index, H 2 /BSA and H 2 /X indices correlated significantly (p < 5), but negatively, with passive drag at 1.9, 2.2 and 2.5 ms -1, when height and kick time were held constant. Greater height per unit mass, greater height per unit surface area and greater height per unit body cross-sectional area all corresponded with lower passive drag, and supported the Froude number theory. Therefore, anthropometric indices could explain how body morphology interacts with passive drag. Furthermore, the Ponderal Index is associated with the wave making component of drag (Lyttle et al., 1998), while the H 2 /BSA and the H 2 /X are related to frictional and form drag, respectively (Clarys, 1978). In contrast to these authors, the significant correlations between passive drag and all of the three indices at the three highest velocities suggested similar contributions from wave making, friction and form components of drag. The Influence of the Flutter Kick on Net Force The mean kick time for 25 m was significantly and negatively correlated with age and many anthropometric variables. Muscular strength and power of children increases with physical development and enables them to generate greater power. In combination with a better kicking technique, this could enhance kicking performance (Touissant et al., 1990). The kick time of the 9 year olds did not differ significantly from the 11 year olds, but the 13 year olds were significantly faster. Kicking performance did not correlated significantly with passive drag at any velocities. Clarys (1978) claimed that passive drag is not related to swimming performance, as swimmers do not stay in a rigid position. However, Chatard et al. (1990) found passive drag to be an important variable in the regression equations for predicting maximal swimming velocity for both males and females. Passive drag has also been shown to have a significant role in the starts and turns. Minimising passive drag during the push-off phase after the turn has been shown to be a critical part of overall turning performance (Lyttle et al., 1999).

5 Net force measured during active towing is sum of active drag force and the propulsive force generated by the kick. If the active drag of the three age groups were similar (Toussaint, et al., 1990) and the propulsive kicking force for the 13 year olds was greater than the younger age groups, then the net force (in the kicking condition) for the 13 year olds would be less than the other two age groups. However, this was not the case which indicated that the mean net force produced by the three age groups during kicking were similar (Figure 3). CONCLUSION As the swimmers ages increased, so too did the anthropometric variables and passive drag at velocities exceeding 1.9ms -1. Body mass was found to be the only predictor of passive drag at these velocities. Increased height was only associated with lower passive drag when all other anthropometric variables were similar. This study indicated that active drag during prone flutter kicking is related to passive drag and a number of anthropometric variables. This reinforces the importance of the streamline position adopted during the gliding and kicking phase after the turn to maximise velocity and distance. REFERENCES 1. Chatard, J. C., Lavoie, J. M., Bourgoin, B. and Lacour, J. R. The contribution of passive as a determinant of swimming performance. Int. J. Sports Med. 11: 367-372, 1990. 2. Clarys, J. P. Relationship of human body form to passive and active hydrodynamic drag. In: Biomechanics VI-B, E. Asmussen & K. Jørgensen (Eds.). Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978, pp. 120-125. 3. Huijing, P., Toussaint, H., Mackay, R., Vervoorn, K., Clarys, J., de Groot, G. and Hollander, A. Active drag related to the body dimensions. In: Swimming Science V B. Ungerechts, K. Wilke & K. Reischle (Eds). Champaign, Il: Human Kinetics, 1988, 31-37. 4. Kolmogorov, S. V., Rumyantseva, O. A., Gordon, B. J. and Cappaert, J. M. Hydrodynamic characteristics of competitive swimmers of different genders and performance levels. J. Appl. Biom. 13:88-97, 1997. 5. Lyttle, A. D., Blanksby, B. A., Elliott, B. C. and Lloyd, D. G. The effect of depth and velocity on drag during the streamlined glide. J. Swim. Res. 13:15-22, 1998. 6. Lyttle, A., Elliott, B., Blanksby, B. and Lloyd, D. An instrument for quantifying the hydrodynamic drag of swimmers: a technical note. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 37:261-270, 1999. 7. Rushall, B. S., Sprigings, E. J., Holt, L. E. and Cappaert, J. M. A re-evaluation of forces in swimming. J. Swim. Res. 10:6-30, 1994. 8. Toussaint, H. M., de Looze, M., van Rossem, B., Leijdekkers, M. and Dignum, H. The effects of growth on drag in young swimmers. Int. J. Sports Biom. 6:18-28, 1990.