Case 1:14-cr WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 19

Similar documents
support and resources, as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. 2339A(b), including but not limited

CHICAGO MAN CHARGED WITH PROVIDING MATERIAL SUPPORT TO AL QAEDA BY ATTEMPTING TO SEND FUNDS OVERSEAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF FLORIDA. t.+i3 -* Is U.S.C. tj 2339B 18 U.S.C. tj 2339A 18 U.S.C. tj 844(n) 18 U.S.C. tj 2384 INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA INDICTMENT INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendant DENNIS EARL HECKER, a resident of Minnesota,

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 13 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 9

CONCEALED HANDGUN LICENSE (CHL) INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT

laws and regulations, including Title 18, United States Code, Section 793, and Executive Order

Office of Special Counsel

Case 6:15-cr AA Document 1 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION 6:15-CR- INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No. 16-CR Honorable Sean F. Cox

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Magistrate ' oepun Plaintiff, The undersigned Complainant, being duly sworn, states: Count One

Case 3:11-cr RJB -DMS Document 3 Filed 03/17/11 Page 1 of 9

Amnesty International August l993 AI Index: EUR 45/10/93

article 22 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION. Bald & Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668(a))

06l1shaa 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 2 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3 4 v.

CAT/C/47/D/353/2008. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. United Nations

Specifically, the bill addresses:

GUNS AND THE WORKPLACE

Interrogations and Recordings: Relevant 9/11 Commission Requests and CIA Responses

FIREARMS IN THE WORKPLACE NORTH DAKOTA BANKERS ASSOCIATION 65 TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION

Case 1:04-cv AKH Document Filed 02/15/11 Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT 39

Open Carry Frequently Asked Questions

Peabody Police. Peabody Police Department. Firearms Licensing

TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /28/2014 3/30/2014

Peabody Police. Peabody Police Department. Firearms Licensing

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division STATEMENT OF FACTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

I ve taught interrogation training courses to police investigators in Florida, Louisiana and Texas.

ADDITIONAL FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Overview of the Justice System. Colorado Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCCJJ)

RESPONSE TO A SUICIDE/HOMICIDE BOMBING SCENE

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:10-cr RBW Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cr LMB Document 124 Filed 01/18/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 883 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

The Critical Role of Animal Control and Humane LEOs in the FBI S NATIONAL INCIDENT BASED REPORTING SYSTEM (NIBRS)

Attachment to Form 95 Claim by Hassan Shibly, Personal Representative

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. PARTIES

ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. [ NMAC - Rp, NMAC, 01/01/2018]

MARIST COLLEGE INFRACTIONS REPORT. By the NCAA Committee on Infractions. MISSION, KANSAS--This report is organized as follows: I. Introduction.

The Patchwork of State Laws on Firearm Prohibitions for Domestic Violence Protective Orders

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT APRIL 11, 2012

Making the Connection Between Gun Violence and Domestic Violence

TRIBUNALE DI PERUGIA - CORTE D ASSISE WITNESS DEPOSITION - POPOVIC JOVANA

You must apply in person. Appointments are REQUIRED. Schedule online at or Call

Soldier admits guilt over Iraq photos (Tue 3 May, 2005)

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding the information that was redacted, if any, please contact:

CONCEALED CARRY POLICY

YOUR 7 RULES FOR THE JUSTIFIED USE OF FORCE

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING ESSENTIAL EVENTS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO CR-COOKE/BROWN(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding the information that was redacted, if any, please contact:

UNCLASSIFIED OPENING OATH SESSION 1

Darien Police Department

Case3:08-cv JSW Document174-9 Filed01/10/14 Page1 of 5. Exhibit 9. Exhibit 9

Kerry Gillie - November 6, 2012 Redirect Examination by Ms. Vollman. 4 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:

WHO WERE THE MURDER VICTIMS? RACE-SEX-AGE

DECISION OF THE CHIEF CIVILIAN DIRECTOR OF THE INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE

FIREARMS LICENSE APPLICANTS IMPORTANT INFORMATION - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY

Rules regarding HUNTING in Ohio townships

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

Assessments DRAFT. (October 17, 2013)

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

FILED DEC ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Jackson County STATE OF WISCONSIN. DA Case No.: 2012JA Plaintiff, Assigned DA/ADA: Gerald R.

Lake Louise Pond Hockey Classic February 21-25, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

2 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 5 Q. Would you please state your name for the. 8 Q. All right. Officer Carreon, I would like to

Investigative Report Riverbend Caretaker October 18, 2017

The government moves for reconsideration of part of my Opinion and Order of September

December 8, To All Bureau of Corrections Members,

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Senior Judge Hodges Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT. DATE ISSUED: March 9, 2017 GENERAL ORDER U-2 PURPOSE

Red Deer RCMP recent arrests catch numerous suspects wanted on warrants (7 pgs)

Page: 1 of 5 Approval Date: 01/27/2014

Case 1:18-cv UA Document 1 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK INTRODUCTION

I am making this statement to Detective Sergeant Simon MOORE about being at Furneaux Lodge on New Year s Eve 1997/98.

Nevada Agencies that Record Interrogations

DeClue, G. (2006). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Florida. Psychologist, 57(1),

BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Background. 1. How have the concealed carry laws changed for public universities?

Lester street autopsy photos

Concept : Mrs. Maja Daruwala. Content & Research Coordination : Dr. Doel Mukerjee. Script : Ms. Vasudha Reddy

QUALIFICATIONS OF GRADUATES

Date of Report: November 30, 2017 Christopher Shane, Head Cross Country Coach Complainant:

COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket No DECISION

USA Swimming Background Check Program Frequently Asked Questions

REASONABLE USE OF FORCE IN COUNTY JAILS

IX. UNIFORM FIREARMS ACT UPDATE: OPEN CARRY

Case 2:11-cr Document 2 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAR 0 II 2011 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Monthly Crime Report November 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE RELIEF. Plaintiff, Defendants. I INTRODUCTION

$3.35 MILLION LAWSUIT ALLEGES ACCIDENT CAUSED BY FUNERAL HOME MISHANDLING OF PROCESSION

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM

Mike Lowrie Trucking, Inc., Mike Lowrie Transport, Inc, MC Transport Services, Inc.

THE HAMBURG CELL. A DECONSTRUCTION: How the Attacks were planned

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document Filed 12/31/2008 Page 2 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:15-cr PD Document 38 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Transcription:

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Crim. No. 14-CR-I0159-WGY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KHAIRULLOZHON MATANOV, Defendant VIOLATIONS: 18 U.S.c. 1001(a)(I) (Falsifying, Concealing, and Covering Up a Material Fact in a Federal Investigation by a Trick, Scheme, and Device) 18 U.S.c. 1001(a)(2) (Making a Materially False, Fictitious, and Fraudulent Statement in a Federal Investigation) The United States Attorney charges: SUPERSEDING INFORMATION INTRODUCTION A. THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBINGS ON APRIL 15,2013 AND THE RESULTING INVESTIGATION 1. On April 15,2013, at approximately 2:49 p.m., two improvised explosive devices exploded on the north side of Boylston Street along the Boston Marathon's final stretch while the race was underway. 2. Each explosion killed at least one person; maimed, burned, and wounded scores of others; and damaged public and private property. In total, three people were killed and over two hundred individuals were injured. 3. Shortly afterward, the bombings were widely publicized through a variety of media, including radio, television, and the Internet. 4. Immediately following the bombings, thousands of law enforcement personnel 1

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 2 of 19 from local police departments, the Massachusetts State Police, and federal agencies conducted an extensive investigation into the bombings, allied by the Federal Bureau ofinvestigation's (FBI's) Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF). 5. As part of this terrorism investigation, law enforcement personnel conducted an extensive manhunt for the bombers throughout the Boston metropolitan area and elsewhere and numerous interviews to, among other things, uncover and thwart any other planned attacks; identify, locate, and arrest the bombers; and collect evidence. 6. On April 18, 2013, at approximately 5:15 p.m., the FBI published on its website photographs of two individuals suspected of detonating the bombs at the Marathon. Those photographs were quickly and widely republished throughout the media, including by CNN over its website. 7. On April 19,2013, at approximately 2:00 a.m., the FBI published additional photographs ofthe two suspects on its website. 8. The photographs published on April 18 and 19 depicted two brothers: Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who resided in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Dzhokhar A. Tsamaev, who resided in Cambridge, Massachusetts and Dartmouth, Massachusetts. Their names were publicly released later. 9. Between the late night hours of April 18,2013, and the early morning hours of April 19,2013, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev engaged in a shootout with law enforcement in Watertown, Massachusetts, that involved firearms and improvised explosive devices. Tamerlan Tsarnaev was injured and died shortly thereafter. 10. Dzhokhar Tsamaev escaped the shootout and remained at large until the evening 2

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 3 of 19 of April 19, 2013, when he was arrested after hiding from police in a drydocked boat in a Watertown, Massachusetts backyard. 11. During the investigation, which continued after Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's arrest, it was material to collect all available evidence and identify all witnesses related to the bombings and the bombers' movements, and to determine, among other things, (a) who, if anyone, had conspired with the Tsarnaevs; (b) where the conspirators had been, and with whom they had met, before and after the bombings; (c) each ofthe conspirators' roles in planning and executing the bombings; (d) how the conspirators decided to bomb the Marathon; (e) the identities of any individuals with whom the conspirators might have discussed terrorism; (f) the nature and extent ofthose individuals' friendship, contact, and communication with the conspirators; and (g) any information and views that those individuals held related to terrorism and the conspirators. B. THE DEFENDANT AND HIS CONTACT WITH THE TSARNAEVS DURING THE WEEK OF THE BOMBINGS 12. KHAIRULLOZHON MATANOV is a citizen of Kyrgyzstan who entered the United States lawfully in 2010, has lived in Massachusetts since then and has worked, among other jobs, as a taxicab driver. 13. While in the United States, MATANOV met Tamerlan Tsarnaev and became friends with him, and he also knew Tamerlan Tsamaev's brother, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. MATANOV participated in a variety of activities with Tamerlan Tsarnaev, including discussing religious topics and hiking up a New Hampshire mountain in order to train like, and praise, the "mujahideen." 14. In the hours and days following the bombings, MATANOV contacted and attempted to contact Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev by cellphone and saw Tamerlan in person 3

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 4 of 19 at least twice. 15. About forty minutes after the bombings, at approximately 3:31 p.m. on Monday, April 15,2013, MATANOV called Tamerlan Tsarnaev and invited him to dinner that night. Tamerlan accepted. That night, MATANOV bought Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsamaev dinner at a restaurant. 16. After MATANOV returned home from dinner with the Tsamaevs following the bombings on Monday, April 15, MATANOV spoke with Witness 1 (whose name is known to the United States Attorney). When Witness 1 told MATANOV that Witness 1 hoped that the Boston Marathon bombers were not Muslim, MATANOV initially responded that the bombings could have had a just reason, such as being done in the name of Islam, that he would support the bombings ifthe reason were just or the attack had been done by the Taliban, and that the victims had gone to paradise. 17. In the days following the bombings, MATANOV continued to express support for the bombings, although later that week he said that maybe the bombings were wrong. He expressed sympathy for the victims' families, although he continued to explain away the significance of the victims' deaths on the ground that everyone must eventually die. 18. On Wednesday, April 17,2013, MATANOV called Dzhokhar Tsamaev at approximately 5:04 p.m., but did not connect. Within a minute or so, MATANOV called Tamerlan Tsamaev and talked for almost one-and-a-half minutes. He then placed a call to Dzhokhar Tsamaev around 5:35 p.m. that did not connect. At around 6:53 p.m., MATANOV called Tamerlan Tsarnaev again, and talked for about a minute. MAT ANOV made another call to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev that did not connect on April 17,2013, a few minutes later, around 6:57 4

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 5 of 19 p.m. At some point later that night, MATANOV visited Tamerlan Tsarnaev at his residence in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Around 9:35 p.m. the same night, MATANOV made another call to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev that did not connect. 19. The next day, Thursday, April 18,2013, at approximately 5:15 p.m., the FBI published on its website photographs of the suspected bombers which were quickly and widely republished, including on CNN's website. Shortly after the FBI released the photographs, MATANOV accessed them and stories about them on the FBI's and CNN's websites several times between approximately 5:42 p.m. and 7:17 p.m. About one hour later, at approximately 8:16 p.m., MATANOV called Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's cellphone, but again did not connect with him. 20. About six hours later, on Friday, April 19, 2013, at approximately 2:00 a.m., the FBI published on its website additional photographs of the two suspects. Again, these photographs were quickly and widely republished throughout the media, including by CNN over its website. A short time after that, from approximately 2:33 a.m. to 2:35 a.m., MATANOV accessed these photographs and stories about them and the bombing investigation on CNN's and the FBI's websites, using his laptop computer. 21. About five hours later, around 7:17 a.m., MATANOV made a final call to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's cellphone that did not connect, at a time when Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was still evading law enforcement. 22. The United States Attorney has no evidence that MATANOV had foreknowledge of or participated in the bombings. 5

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 6 of 19 C. MATANOY'S COYER-UP 23. On or about April 18, 2013, and continuing thereafter, MATANOV understood that federal investigators were investigating the Tsarnaevs as the suspected Boston Marathon bombers and that as a part of their investigation, federal investigators would likely want to discuss with MATANOV his friendship, contact, and communication with Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, especially in the week following the bombings, and any information and views he held related to terrorism and the Tsarnaevs. MATANOV tried to discourage and impede that investigation. 24. Early in the morning of Friday, April 19, MATANOV, visibly upset, woke up Witness 1. When Witness 1 asked MATANOV why he appeared upset, MATANOV answered that pictures ofthe bombers had been released and he knew the bombers. MATANOV falsely told Witness 1 that he did not know whether Tamerlan Tsarnaev had any extremist views. Witness 1 suggested that MATANOV contact local authorities or the Federal Bureau of Investigation, rather than wait for them to come for him as a suspect. 25. Around 6:55 a.m., MATANOV received a telephone call from one of his regular taxicab clients, Witness 2 (whose name is known to the United States Attorney), who asked him for a ride. While in the car, Witness 2 and MATANOV listened to the news on the radio and heard the suspected bombers' home address. MATANOV told Witness 2 that he recognized the address as belonging to his friend. When Witness 2 asked how long it had been since MATANOV had been at that address, MATANOV falsely claimed that it had been a while, when in fact he had been at Tamerlan Tsarnaev's apartment less than two days previously, as alleged above in paragraph 18. It was during this taxicab ride that MATANOV made his final 6

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 7 of 19 call to the cellphone of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (then still evading law enforcement), as set forth above in paragraph 21. 26. Later that morning, MATANOV visited Witness 3 (whose name is known to the United States Attorney) and told Witness 3 that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was dead, and that he, Witness 3, had met Tamerlan when MATANOV introduced the two. MATANOV then asked Witness 3 to take some cellphones which were then in MATANOV's possession because, MATANOV said, they were illegal and might be found ifthe FBI searched his apartment, which MATANOV said could happen due to MATANOV's friendship with Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Witness 3 refused to take MATANOV's cellphones. 27. Later that morning, MATANOV picked up Witness 2 again in his cab. In the course of driving Witness 2, MATANOV stated that he wondered whether he should go to the police. Witness 2 suggested that they speak to a police sergeant that Witness 2 knew. After they were unable to reach that individual, MATANOV and Witness 2 drove to the Braintree Police Department, where they told the police that MATANOV knew Tamerlan Tsamaev. 28. MATANOV was then interviewed by a Braintree Police detective, in the presence of Witness 2. 29. At the start of the interview, the detective informed MATANOV and Witness 2 that the Braintree Police Department would likely pass their information on to federal investigators, which MATANOV acknowledged. 30. Although MATANOV acknowledged knowing the Tsarnaevs, their telephone numbers, and certain other details about them, MATANOV also told the detective some information that he intended to be false and misleading. 7

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 8 of 19 31. MATANOV told the detective that he had not seen the photographs ofthe Tsarnaev brothers released by the FBI the previous night, which MATANOV intended to be false, misleading, and to conceal the fact that MATANOV had seen the photographs soon after they were released on April 18 and April 19. 32. MATANOV also told the detective that he mostly knew the Tsamaevs through a common place of worship and through playing soccer, which MATANOV intended to be false, misleading, and to conceal the fact that MATANOV was Tamerlan Tsarnaev's friend and had seen him twice that week on occasions unconnected with soccer or worship. 33. MATANOV also told the detective that he knew that Tamerlan Tsarnaev had a wife and a daughter, but claimed not to know whether they lived with Tamerlan, which MATANOV intended to be false, misleading, and to conceal the fact that MATANOV knew that Tamerlan Tsarnaev lived with his wife and daughter and that MATANOV had even exchanged greetings with Tamerlan's wife and played with his daughter while he visited the Tsarnaev residence less than two days earlier. 34. MATANOV also told the detective that he had not "participate[d] with" Tamerlan Tsarnaev at a house of worship since 2011, which MATANOV intended to be false, misleading, and to conceal the fact that MATANOV had been at a house ofworship with Tamerlan at least as recently as August 2012. 35. At the end of the interview, in a discussion of whether MATANOV should contact the FBI himself, MATANOV said that his information would not assist the FBI in conducting their investigation, which he knew, he said, because he had studied law. 36. The detective nevertheless told MATANOV that the FBI might still want to talk 8

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 9 of 19 to him, and MATANOV agreed to talk with the FBI. 37. At some point before or around noon on April 19, 2013, MATANOV told Witness 1 that he had visited the police and might be contacted by the FBI. 38. MATANOV then asked Witness 1 to keep one or two of his cellphones. Witness 1 refused, telling MATANOV that to do so would be illegal. 39. MATANOV also asked Witness 1 to reformat or help reformat MATANOV's computer, which Witness 1 understood as a request to delete all of the computer's data. Witness 1 refused. MATANOV then asked Witness 1 to just help him delete a few things from his computer. Witness 1 refused again, saying that Witness 1 did not want to delete any evidence that someone else might need later on. MATANOV responded that Witness 1 was not a good "brother." 40. MATANOV nevertheless deleted a large amount of information from his computer, some of which the FBI has been able to restore in an ongoing forensic review. 41. The information that MATANOV deleted included his computer's Internet cache, which his default Internet browser, Google Chrome, used to speed up the program's operation by storing some Internet information, such as references to past Internet searches on Google or snapshots of webpages that MATANOV had visited. Between April 18, 2013, and approximately 6:00 a.m. on April 19,2013, MATANOV deleted a large amount of information from his Google Chrome Internet cache. The deletions included references to the video of the suspected bombers (later identified as the Tsamaevs) released by the FBI on April 18, 2013, at approximately 5:15 p.m., two of the photographs of the bombers released at approximately the same time, and a photograph of Officer Sean Collier, who had allegedly been killed by Dzhokhar 9

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 10 of 19 and Tamerlan Tsamaev on the evening of April 18, 2013. MATANOV deleted his Google Chrome activity selectively, leaving behind Google Chrome activity from other days during the week of April 15, 2013. 42. The data that MATANOV deleted included approximately 902 out of 903 folders/files from his computer's "VIDEOS" folder, and approximately 377 out of 402 folders/files from its "Documents" folder. MATANOV deleted all these files at some point between 2:36 a.m. on April 19, 2013 (right after MATANOV viewed the Tsamaevs' pictures on the Internet) and approximately 7:56 p.m. on April 20, 2013 (when the FBI obtained MATANOV's computer). MATANOV deleted at least about 300 of those files on Friday, April 19, approximately between 12:12 p.m. and 12:13 p.m., shortly after MATANOV was told by the Braintree detective that he might be contacted by the FBI. 43. The files that MATANOV deleted included some files that contained violent content or calls to violence. 44. By deleting his Internet cache and other files, MATANOV obstructed the FBI's determination of his Internet activity during the night of April 18 and the day of April 19, 2013, and the extent to which he shared the suspected bombers' philosophical justification for violence, among other topics ofinterest. MATANOV's deletions thus obstructed the FBI's investigation of the bombings and the suspected bombers, and caused the FBI to expend considerable additional resources during its investigation of the bombings and the suspected bombers. 45. Beginning on April 20, 2013, MATANOV spoke with federal investigators on several occasions. Although MATANOV soon dropped the pretense that he and Tamerlan Tsamaev had not seen each other much, he continued to falsify, conceal, and cover up evidence 10

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 11 of 19 ofthe extent of his friendship, contact and communication with the Tsarnaevs during the week of the bombings, especially during the hours following the bombings. 46. One subject about which MATANOV misinformed federal investigators concerned his interactions with the Tsarnaevs on April 15, 2013, the afternoon and evening of the bombings. a. As discussed above, about 42 minutes after the Marathon was bombed on April 15, 2013, MATANOV called Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and they talked for approximately two minutes. b. During an April 20, 2013 interview, MATANOV told members of the FBI's JTTF that he called Tamerlan at this time to discuss the Sunday night soccer game that Tamerlan had not attended. MATANOV then falsely claimed that on Monday evening, after the bombing, he was alone at a restaurant that he and the Tsarnaev brothers frequented, when the Tsarnaev brothers walked in. By this, MATANOV intended to give investigators the false impression that this was a chance meeting. MATANOV falsely claimed that the brothers had been sitting outside and that he had not seen the car in which they had arrived. MATANOV falsely claimed that he had not driven them to the restaurant or given them a ride at all that day. MATANOV admitted, however, that after the Tsarnaevs ordered their dinner at the restaurant, he paid for their food. MATANOV did not mention discussing the bombing with Tamerlan during the afternoon telephone call, but falsely and misleadingly said that at the restaurant when he first mentioned the bombings, he could not recall the brothers' response, and when he mentioned the 11

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 12 of 19 bombings again, neither brother seemed interested in talking about them. c. These statements and representations were intentionally false and misleading because during the April 15, 2013 telephone call, MATANOV had, in fact, invited Tamerlan to dinner that evening and had even specified the time and the restaurant; on the way to the restaurant, MATANOV saw the Tsarnaevs and picked them up and drove them to where he parked his cab; the three discussed the bombings at the restaurant, and Tamerlan said that he did not believe that Al Qa'ida was responsible because Al Qa'ida usually issues a statement accepting responsibility within two hours of an event, and had not made a statement about the bombing; and after eating, MATANOV drove the Tsamaevs from the restaurant. 47. Another subject about which MATANOV misled investigators concerned when he first suspected and learned that the Tsamaevs were suspected as the bombers, including how he leamed this, where he was at the time, and with whom he had discussed his suspicions. a. During the April 24 interview, MATANOV claimed to members of the FBI's JTTF that he first leamed that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was a suspect in the Marathon bombings while he was in line at an unspecified location, and that he then told the woman behind him in line that he knew Tamerlan and Dzhokhar. This was false and misleading, because MATANOV viewed the Tsamaevs' pictures on CNN's and the FBI's websites during the evening ofapril 18 and the early morning of April 19 and told Witness 1 that he knew the suspected bombers before leaving his apartment that morning. 12

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 13 of 19 b. During an interview on May 3, MATANOV claimed to members of the FBI's JTTF that the first time he thought that the Tsarnaev brothers were the bombers was after hearing the phrase "Chechnyan brothers" from a policeman at the Quincy Adams T stop while driving Witness 2 on the morning of April 19. This was false and misleading, because MATANOV viewed the Tsamaevs' pictures on CNN's and the FBI's websites during the evening of April 18 and the early morning of April 19 and told Witness 1 that he knew the suspected bombers before leaving his apartment that morning. c. During an interview on May 31, MATANOV claimed again to members ofthe FBI's JTTF that the first time he suspected that the Tsamaev brothers were the bombers was when the police at the T station told him that the suspects were Chechen brothers. This was false and misleading for the same reasons given in the prior sub-paragraph. d. During an interview on July 8, MATANOV claimed to the FBI's JTTF that after he reviewed the pictures of the suspected bombers on April 18, he did not look at the Internet again before he left for work on Friday morning. This was false and misleading. MATANOV looked at the Internet around 2:30 a.m. using his laptop and then again around 6:55 a.m. on his cellphone, the latter of which occurred about 15 minutes before he started work that morning. e. Also during the July 8 interview, MATANOV falsely claimed that after he reviewed photographs of the suspected bombers from the Internet and suspected that the Tsamaevs were the bombers, he did not discuss his suspicions with 13

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 14 of 19 anyone, including Witness 1. However, as set forth above, after MATANOV reviewed the pictures, he discussed his suspicions with Witness 1. 48. Yet another subject about which MATANOV misled investigators concerned whether he had watched videos on his computer. a. As set forth above, MATANOV had deleted the vast majority of videos on his computer on April 19 and April 20, 2013. b. During the July 8 interview, MATANOV falsely claimed that he had not watched videos on his computer. c. Ongoing forensic analysis indicates that he had opened dozens of videos on his computer, including as recently as January 2013, at least some of which depicted militaristic action. 14

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 15 of 19 COUNT 1 18 U.S.c. 1001(a)(1) Falsifying, Concealing, and Covering Up a Material Fact in a Federal Investigation by a Trick, Scheme, and Device 49. The United States Attorney realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 48 above, and further charges that: From on or about April 19, 2013, through on or about July 8, 2013, in the District of Massachusetts, the defendant, KHAIRULLOZHON MATANOV, in a matter within the jurisdiction ofthe executive branch ofthe Government of the United States, specifically, the investigation ofthe Boston Marathon bombings conducted by the Federal Bureau ofinvestigation and its Joint Terrorism Task Force, knowingly and willfully falsified, concealed, and covered up a material fact by a trick, scheme, and device, including by lies and misleading statements and by the alteration, destruction, concealment, and covering up of records, documents, and tangible objects, specifically, information on his computer. All in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001(a)(l). 15

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 16 of 19 COUNT 2 18 U.S.c. 1001(a)(2) Making a Materially False, Fictitious, and Fraudulent Statement in a Federal Investigation 50. The United States Attorney realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs I through 48 above, and further charges that: 51. On or about April 20, 2013, in the District of Massachusetts, the defendant, KHAIRULLOZHON MATANOV, in a matter within the jurisdiction of the executive branch of the Government of the United States, specifically, the investigation ofthe Boston Marathon bombings conducted by the Federal Bureau ofinvestigation and its Joint Terrorism Task Force, knowingly and willfully made materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representations, specifically, that MATANOV did not arrive at the restaurant with Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on April 15, 2013; and that he had not driven them on the way to the restaurant or given them a ride at all that night. As KHAIRULLOZHON MATANOV there and then well knew, during a telephone call approximately forty minutes after the Boston Marathon bombings on April 15, 2013, he invited Tamerlan Tsarnaev to dinner that night; arrived at the restaurant with Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev; drove the Tsarnaevs on the way to and from the restaurant; and discussed the bombings with the Tsarnaevs while at the restaurant. All in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001(a)(2). 16

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 17 of 19 COUNT 3 18 U.S.c. 1001(a)(2) Making a Materially False, Fictitious, and Fraudulent Statement in a Federal Investigation 52. The United States Attorney realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 48 above, and further charges that: the defendant, On or about April 24, May 3, May 31, and July 8, 2013, in the District of Massachusetts, KHAIRULLOZHON MATANOV, in a matter within the jurisdiction ofthe executive branch ofthe Government of the United States, specifically, the investigation ofthe Boston Marathon bombings conducted by the Federal Bureau ofinvestigation and its Joint Terrorism Task Force, knowingly and willfully made materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representations, specifically, on or about April 24, 2013, MATANOV stated and represented that he first learned that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were the suspected bombers while he was at work driving a taxi at some time in the morning of April 19, 2013; on or about May 3, 2013, MATANOV stated and represented that the first time he thought that the Tsarnaevs were the bombers was at the Quincy Adams T stop, when he heard the phrase "Chechnyan brothers"; on or about May 31, 2013, MATANOV stated and represented that the first time that he suspected that the Tsarnaevs were the bombers was at the T station upon hearing that the suspects were Chechnyan brothers; on or about July 8, 2013, MATANOV stated and represented that after he reviewed the photographs of the suspected bombers on April 18, 2013, he did not look at the Internet again before he left for work on April 19,2013; and on or about July 8,2013, MATANOV stated and represented that after he reviewed photographs of the suspected bombers from the Internet, he did not discuss his 17

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 18 of 19 suspicions with Witness 1. As MATANOV there and then well knew, MATANOV suspected, learned, and thought that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were the suspected bombers when he reviewed the suspected bombers' photographs in the afternoon and evening of April 18,2013, and the early morning of April 19, 2013; after MATANOV reviewed the photographs on April 18,2013, he looked at the Internet again early in the morning of April 19, 2013 on his laptop and once again on his cellphone as he left for work later that morning; and after MATANOV reviewed photographs of the suspected bombers on the Internet, he did discuss his suspicions that he knew the suspected bombers with Witness 1. All in violation of 18 U.S.c. 1001(a)(2). 18

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103 Filed 01/12/15 Page 19 of 19 COUNT 4 18 U.S.c. 1001(a)(2) Making a Materially False, Fictitious, and Fraudulent Statement in a Federal Investigation Involving International and Domestic Terrorism 53. The United States Attorney realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 48 above, and further charges that: On or about July 8, 2013, in the District of Massachusetts, the defendant, KHAIRULLOZHON MATANOV, in a matter within the jurisdiction of the executive branch of the Government ofthe United States, specifically, the investigation of the Boston Marathon bombings conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and its Joint Terrorism Task Force, knowingly and willfully made materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representations, specifically, that MATANOV did not watch certain video files that had been downloaded onto his computer. As MATANOV there and then well knew, he had opened dozens of videos on his computer, including as recently as January 2013, most of which had been deleted. All in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001(a)(2). By: Date: January 12,2015 cott L. Garland Aloke S. Chakravarty Assistant U.S. Attorneys Courthouse Way, Ste. 9200 Boston, MA 02210 617-748-3290 scott.garland@usdoj.gov Massachusetts Bar # 650358 19

'\!l.js 45 (5/97) - (Revised U.S.D.C. MA 3/25/2011) Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103-1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 2 Criminal Case Cover Sheet u.s. District Court - District of Massachusetts Place of Offense: Category No. I Investigating Agency FBI City Boston, Quincy, and Braintree Related Case Information: County Suffolk and Norfolk Superseding Ind./ Inf. Infonnation Case No. l4-cr-lol59-wgy Same Defendant X ------ New Defendant --;--- Magistrate Judge Case Number See additional information Search Warrant Case Number R 20IR 40 from District of Defendant Information: ------------------- Defendant Name Khairullozhon Matanov Juvenile: DYes [{]No Alias Name Address Is this person an attorney and/or a member of any state/federal bar: (City & State) Quincy, Massachusetts DYes [{] No Birth date (Yr only): 1990 SSN (last4#): 5703 Sex M Race: White Nationality: Kyrgyzstan Defense Counsel if known: Paul Glickman, Esq. Address 1 South MarketBuilding,4th Floor Bar Number 550840 Boston,MA 02109 u.s. Attorney Information: AUSA Scott L. Garland& Aloke S. Chakravarty Bar Number if applicable 650358;637288 Interpreter: DYes [{] No List language and/or dialect: Victims: DYes [(]No If yes, are there multiplecrime victimsunder 18USC 3771(d)(2) DYes DNo Matter to be SEALED: DYes [{] No Dwarrant Requested D Regular Process [{] In Custody Location Status: Arrest Date 05130/2014 [Z]Already in Federal Custody as of 05130/2014 III Wyatt DAlready in State Custody at ----------- DServing Sentence _..::..._--------- Gwaiting Trial DOn Pretrial Release: Ordered by: on Charging Document: DComplaint [{]Information D Indictment Total # of Counts: DPetty--- D Misdemeanor [{]Felony 4 Continue on Page 2 for Entry ofd.s.c. Citations I hereby certify that the case numbers of any prior proceedings before a Magistrate Judge are ccurately set forth above. Date: Signature of AUSA:

Case 1:14-cr-10159-WGY Document 103-1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 2 of 2 JS 45 (5197) (Revised U.SD.C. MA 1217105) Page 2 of 2 or Reverse District Court Case Number (To be filled in by deputy clerk): 14-CR-10159-WGY Name of Defendant KHAIRULLOZHON MATANOV u.s.c. Citations Index Key/Code Description of Offense Charged Count Numbers Falsifying, Concealing, and Covering Up a Material Fact Set 1 18 U.S.c. ~ looi(a)(l) in a Federal Investigation by Trick, Scheme, and Device Making False, Fictitious, & Fraudulent Statements in a Set 2 18 U.S.c. ~ looi(a)(2) Federal Terrorism Investigation 2-4 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Set 6 Set 7 Set 8 Set 9 Set 10 _ Set 11 Set 12 _ Set 13 _ Set 14 _ Set 15 _ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Prior proceedings include 13-2ll2-MBB, as well as other matters before Magistrate Judge Bowler USAMA CRlM - Criminal Case Cover Sheet.pdf 31412013