Should you have any questions, please contact the communicating author at Sincerely yours, Megan Brown

Similar documents
A Survey of Freshwater Mussels in the Middle Fork Holston River, Virginia

Freshwater Mussel Propagation and Culture 2014

A Status Survey of Freshwater Mussel Populations in the Upper Clinch River, Tazewell County, Virginia

Tim Lane Southwest Virginia Mussel Recovery Coordinator Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries

Freshwater Mussel Declines in the Upper South Fork Holston River, Virginia

Update on Mussel Restoration Efforts in the Clinch and Powell Rivers. Clinch-Powell Clean Rivers Initiative, St. Paul, VA September,

CLINCH RIVER FRESHWATER MUSSELS UPSTREAM OF NORRIS RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE AND VIRGINIA: A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT FROM 2004 TO

Freshwater Mussels of Virginia (Bivalvia: Unionidae): An Introduction to Their Life History, Status and Conservation

CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II. Proposals resulting from reviews by the Animals and Plants Committees

Freshwater Mussel Surveys of the Big Darby Creek System in Central Ohio G. THOMAS WATTERS

,/7 ^. _, ** S: E. F. Benfield L. A. Helfrish LIFE HISTORY OF THE ENDANGERED SHINY PIGTOE PEARLY MUSSEL, FUSCONAIA EDGARIANA,

ALABAMA WILDLIFE -VOLUME 2~ Imperiled Aquatic Mollusks and Fishes RALPH E. MIRARCHI JEFFREY T. GARNER MAURICE F. (SCOTT) METTEE PATRICK E.

Unionid Mussel Surveys at Selected Sites in Hinton Creek, Pine Creek, and Pine Lake - Manistee River Watershed, Michigan

Fish and Mussel Surveys in Hudson Mills Metropark, Huron River

Environmental Baseline Additional Studies: 2012 Freshwater Mussel Surveys Targeting Dwarf Wedgemussel Interim Report

Field Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Minnesota. Bernard E. Sietman

CURRENT STATUS OF FRESHWATER MUSSELS (ORDER UNIONOIDA) IN TH E WABASH RIVER DRAINAGE OF INDIAN A

Remnant Freshwater Mussel Diversity in Rondeau Bay, Lake Erie

FRESHWATER MUSSELS. Master Naturalist Program September 27, 2016

Distribution of unionid mussels and sea lamprey larvae in relationship to habitat in streams of Lower Michigan and the Paw Paw River

Freshwater mussels of the Little Wabash River basin

Changes in the Mussel Community of Ohio Brush Creek

The Mussel Fauna of the Glover River, Oklahoma

Freshwater Mussel Surveys of Great Lakes Tributary Rivers in Michigan

APPENDIX A-4 SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FRESHWATER MUSSEL ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

[FWS R4 ES 2017 N043; FXES FF04E00000] ACTION: Notice of receipt of permit applications; request for comment.

Freshwater Mussels of the Mackinaw River

Predicting habitat suitability for eleven imperiled fluvial freshwater mussels

Got Mussels? Freshwater Mussel Volunteer Survey Program

Appendix C Bill Cross Rapids Freshwater Mussel and Fishery Study Plan

Success and Potential Impacts of Rock Ramp Fish Passages in the Saginaw Bay Watershed

ILLINOJ S PRODUCTION NOTE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN

FRESHWATER MOLLUSK SAMPLING ALONG THE SOUTHERN I-294 CORRIDOR. Prepared by: Sarah A. Douglass, Christopher A. Phillips, and Michael J.

Prepared by: Peter J. Badra Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box Lansing, MI

GEORGIA SOUTH CAROLINA GEORGIA SOUTH CAROLINA Concern Concern Endangered Unlisted

A Field Guide to Pennsylvania s Freshwater Mussels

CONODOGUINET CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER

Freshwater mussels of the Des Plaines River and Lake Michigan tributaries in Illinois

Freshwater mussel surveys of the Welland River watershed:

Ausable River Aquatic Habitat Assessment

Decline of the Freshwater Mussel Fauna of the North Fork and South Fork Shenandoah Rivers, Virginia

Appendix 1-2. Changes from Alabama Wildlife

Mussel Relocation Plan and Mussel Survey Results

A Survey of the Commercially Valuable Mussels of the Wabash and White Rivers of Indiana 1

Distribution of Unionid Mussels in Tributaries of the Lower Flint River, Southwestern Georgia: An Examination of Current and Historical Trends.

, \ Dr. R'iclwd "J. N~, ChjJjjjiaL

Vermont Freshwater Mussel Survey A Participant s Guide

Quantitative Freshwater Mussel Survey Date Prepared: 11/20/2017

ABSTRACT. Key words: New River, Tennessee, coal mining impacts, resource extraction, Unionidae, endangered species. INTRODUCTION

Acknowledgements. Introduction

Freshwater mussels of the Illinois River tributaries: Upper, Middle, and Lower drainages

Freshwater Mussel Inventory of the Wild & Scenic Westfield River

Figure 1: Lampmussel extending its foot to burrow into Potomac substrate. (Photo by Adam Griggs, ICPRB)

Rainbow. Villosa iris Lea. State Distribution. Best Survey Period. Photo by Kurt Stepnitz, MSU University Relations

Healthy Shellfish = Healthy Estuaries: Ecosystem-Based Restoration of Freshwater and Marine Bivalves. Danielle Kreeger. Partnership for the DE Estuary

CLYDE RIVER FISH KILL 2016 PRELIMINARY REPORT

BIOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES IN THE CLINCH AND POWELL RIVERS AND THEIR IMPORTANCE TO FRESHWATER MUSSEL CONSERVATION

Current Status of Freshwater Mussels and Associated Communities in the Grand and St. Joseph Rivers, Michigan. Prepared by: Peter J. Badra and Reuben R

Allegheny Parker. Credit: Timothy Wertz, PFBC

SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING PERMITS Valid: one year from date of issuance Resident - Nonresident

A Review of the Fishes and Freshwater Mussels of the Tippecanoe River Basin in Indiana, with Comments on Freshwater Mussel Life History

The following are corrections to. A Guide To The California Trail To The Humboldt River (Third Edition)

Volunteer. Training Manual. Ecological Inventory and Monitoring

Status: State: Endangered Federal: Endangered. Status: State: Endangered (pending) Federal: Species of Special Concern

Brown County Historical Society. Fourteen tons of shells were shipped from Granite Falls and 16 tons from Wegdahl to the Muscatine Button Factory.

Saving Our Mussels: What you can do to help. Did you know? Get advice. Retain habitat for mussels. Best Stewardship Practices

RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY OF THE FRESHWATER MUSSEL FAUNA OF THE LOWER SALUDA AND CONGAREE RIVERS, LAKE MURRAY, AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES

FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT

LOCK AND DAM 3 FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT

Status and Distribution of Freshwater Mussels (Unionacea) Inhabiting the Saline River / Holly Creek Bottoms Area, Saline County, Arkansas

PROJECTS STREETS

Appendix H Fairy Shrimp Habitat Assessment

Fish monitoring requirements of new FERC licenses: are they adequate?

Hammer Vale and Linchmere Common

UNIONID MUSSEL MORTALITY FROM HABITAT LOSS

Aspects of an Interior Stream Clam Midden from 1915 at Quasqueton, Buchanan County Iowa

Curriculum vitae February Charles R. Randklev

SURVEY OF FRESHWATER MUSSELS AND SNAILS DOWNSTREAM OF HOLT TAILRACE

Appendix A. Figures. Proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Bank Areas

I LLINOI S PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

MCAA Mens & Masters 6 Stage Road Relays Saturday 24th September pm Sutton Park Sutton Coldfield Birmingham

Southeastern Aquatic Research Michael M. Gangloff, Ph.D Hopewell Church Road, Boone, NC Federal EIN: Phone: (334)

Enhancing and Conserving Pennsylvania s Diverse Natural Resources for Future Generations

TENNESSEE FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION PROCLAMATION STATEWIDE PROCLAMATION ON THE COMMERCIAL TAKING, POSSESSING, AND SELLING OF MUSSELS

MCAA Women s 4 Stage Road Relays Saturday 24th September pm Sutton Park Sutton Coldfield Birmingham

AMERICA S PEARLY MUSSELS

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

NORTH RIVER FISH KILL PRELIMINARY REPORT 2014 SUMMARY

REGIONAL CONDITIONS FOR 2012 NATIONWIDE PERMITS IN MISSISSIPPI

Environmental. Effects of Dredging

Help Save America's Pearly Mussels. Abstract

Burr Intermediate School will be having a Science Fair on March 6 March 7, You will be invited to view the projects on one of those evenings.

Newsletter of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Volume 20 Number 1 March 2018

CHAPTER 6. APPENDICES

A 1994 UNIONID MUSSEL SURVEY (MOLLUSCA: BIVALVIA: UNIONIDAE) FROM THE HEADWATERS OF THE ROOT RIVER SYSTEM, MN, TO THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER.

Rugraw, LLC is the Applicant for FERC Project No Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project (LLHP).

MINNESOTA FRESHWATER MUSSEL SURVEY AND RELOCATION PROTOCOL

Floating Pennywort Project. River Medway and River Cray locations

Chapter 1. Introduction to mussels and mussel ecology

Transcription:

December 3, 2004 Megan Brown 422 West Main Street South Vale, OR 97918 Janet C. Hering est@caltech.edu (626-395-2142) California Institute of Technology Environmental Science & Engineering (138-78) Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Dear Dr. Hering, Enclosed please find the revised Supporting Information section of the manuscript es048573p "Freshwater mussel shells as environmental chronicles: Geochemical and taphonomic signatures of mercury-related extirpations in the North Fork Holston River, Virginia" by Megan Brown, Michal Kowalewski, Donald Cherry, Richard Neves, and Madeline Schreiber to be considered for publication in Environmental Science & Technology. The revised manuscript has been edited to consist of 17 pages including figure captions (5063 words), and includes five figures and two tables. The Supporting Information section consists of six pages, including information concerning the location of sampling sites, four tables, and one graph. Should you have any questions, please contact the communicating author at mebrown@vt.edu. Sincerely yours, Megan Brown (Communicating Author) 422 West Main Street South Vale, OR 97918 Tel: (541) 473-2352 Email: mebrown@vt.edu

Supporting Information Available. Appendix S1. Location of sampling sites. Site 1 is approximately 3.2 km past Bradford, Virginia, where Rt. 91 north meets the river at Sagewood Road, behind the Virginia Department of Transportation sign. Site 2 is approximately 50 m downstream of the river gauging station on Rt. 91 South. Site 3 is located at river mile 79.9 and directly below the Olin-Mathieson settling ponds in Saltville. This site is approximately 0.8 km downstream from the last holding pond at the pullover with a yellow road gate on the left. The two downstream sites are located at river miles 68.6 (site 4) and 56 (site 5). Site 4 is approximately 2.4 km down Rt. 611 after it crosses Hortons Gap Road. This site is at the pullover just after the road becomes dirt. Continue down Rt. 611 until its junction with Rt. 687. Take a right on Rt. Porterfield Hwy and continue for 0.4 km until the next right, Rt. 876. Take the first right on Rt. 802 and Site 5 is at the end of Heinz Island off to the left of the road. S1

Table S1. The species collected from the death assemblage at each of the five sites along the North Fork Holston River. Common Name Genus Species Site pheasantshell Actinonaias pectorosa 3,4 elktoe Alasmidonta marginata 4 spike Elliptio dilatata 4 Tennessee pigtoe Fusconaia barnesiana 1,2,4 shiny pigtoe Fusconaia cor 2,4 wavyrayed lampmussel Lampsilis fasciola 1,2,3,4,5 pocketbook Lampsilis ovata 3 slabside pearlymussel Lexingtonia dolabelloides 1,2,3,4,5 Cumberland moccasinshell Medionidus conradicus 1,2,3,4 Tennessee clubshell Pleurobema oviforme 1,2,3,4,5 fluted kidneyshell Ptychobranchus subtentum 1,2,3,4 kidneyshell Ptychobranchus fasciolaris 3,4 rainbow Villosa iris 1,2,3,4,5 mountain creekshell Villosa vanuxemensis 1,2,3,4,5 S2

Table S2. The Hg content of shells from various species at all five sites. dbe= below detection limit. Hg Length Fragment Total Site River Mile (µg/kg) (mm) Length (mm) Genus Species Grade Site 1 96 7 57.22 Fusconaia barnesiana 2 Site 1 96 8 73.33 Lampsilis fasciola 2 Site 1 96 6 65 Lexingtonia dolabelloides 2 Site 1 96 9 54.03 Lexingtonia dolabelloides 2 Site 1 96 6 68.39 Pleurobema oviforme 2 Site 1 96 6 49.59 Pleurobema oviforme 5 Site 1 96 dbe 78.03 Pleurobema oviforme 4 Site 1 96 dbe 68.39 Pleurobema oviforme 2 Site 1 96 dbe 57 Ptychobranchu subtentum 6 Site 2 85 7 42.04 Fusconaia s barnesiana 4 Site 2 85 9 56.28 Fusconaia barnesiana 1 Site 2 85 5 70.04 Fusconaia barnesiana 4 Site 2 85 6 66.55 Pleurobema oviforme 2 Site 2 85 5 49.27 Pleurobema oviforme 1 Site 2 85 dbe 46.07 Pleurobema oviforme 3 Site 2 85 8 72.25 Pleurobema oviforme 3 Site 2 85 31 75.91 Ptychobranchu subtentum 5 Site 3 79.9 162 72 Actinonaias s pectorosa 8 Site 3 79.9 41 73.21 Lampsilis fasciola 3 Site 3 79.9 47 55.47 Pleurobema oviforme 6 Site 3 79.9 4637 58.9 Pleurobema oviforme 4 Site 3 79.9 23 78.27 Ptychobranchu subtentum 5 Site 3 79.9 176 41.44 Villosa s iris 2 Site 4 68.6 25 114 Actinonaias pectorosa 5 Site 4 68.6 7 55.82 Lexingtonia dolabelloides 5 Site 4 68.6 115 54.19 Pleurobema oviforme 6 Site 4 68.6 52 47.97 Pleurobema oviforme 6 Site 4 68.6 20 45.3 Pleurobema oviforme 5 Site 4 68.6 14 48.57 Pleurobema oviforme 6 Site 4 68.6 39 39.09 Villosa iris 2 Site 4 68.6 66 50.31 Villosa vanuxemensis 1 Site 5 56 10 53.69 Lampsilis fasciola 1 Site 5 56 14 63.64 Lampsilis fasciola 3 Site 5 56 8 59.81 Pleurobema oviforme 3 Site 5 56 6 59.06 Pleurobema oviforme 5 Site 5 56 10 59.81 Pleurobema oviforme 3 Site 5 56 7 59.06 Pleurobema oviforme 5 S3

Site 5 56 dbe 55.89 Pleurobema oviforme 6 Site 5 56 7 48 Villosa iris 2 Table S3. The Hg content of shells collected at Saltville in 1917 by C. C. Adams. Year Hg Content Location Collected (µg/kg) Length (mm) Genus Species Saltville 1917 5 68 Pleurobema oviforme Saltville 1917 6 68 Pleurobema oviforme S4

Table S4. Summary of taphonomic data grouped by site and type of shell morphology. Site Number of shells Articulation Fragmentation Edge preservation External alteration surface Total grade taphonomic All data pooled 1 68 0.59 1 0.50 0.78 0 1.05 1.43 1 0.61 1.44 1 0.50 4.24 4 2.23 2 104 0.64 1 0.48 0.97 0 1.17 1.56 2 0.65 1.47 1 0.54 4.64 5 2.29 3 53 0.94 1 0.23 1.36 1 1.26 1.87 2 0.39 1.66 2 0.59 5.83 6 1.92 4 81 0.96 1 0.19 1.12 1 0.98 1.80 2 0.46 1.64 2 0.48 5.53 6 1.56 5 60 0.63 1 0.49 1.17 1 1.25 1.47 1.5 0.57 1.35 1 0.63 4.62 5 2.37 Thick shells only 1 30 0.53 1 0.51 0.70 0 0.99 1.57 2 0.50 1.50 1.5 0.51 4.30 5 2.17 2 60 0.68 1 0.47 0.92 0.5 1.11 1.68 2 0.60 1.55 2 0.53 4.83 5 2.10 3 30 0.97 1 0.18 1.07 1 1.14 1.97 2 0.18 1.73 2 0.45 5.73 6 1.34 4 61 0.95 1 0.22 1.07 1 0.87 1.88 2 0.32 1.75 2 0.43 5.66 6 1.39 5 20 0.40 0 0.50 0.60 0.5 0.68 1.40 1 0.60 1.20 1 0.62 3.60 3 1.67 Thin shells only 1 31 0.58 1 0.50 0.58 0 0.85 1.20 1 0.65 1.29 1 0.46 3.64 3 1.96 2 34 0.47 0 0.51 0.62 0 1.04 1.20 1 0.69 1.20 1 0.48 3.50 3 2.15 3 16 0.88 1 0.34 1.31 1 1.35 1.62 2 0.62 1.38 2 0.81 5.19 5.5 2.66 4 12 1.00 1 0.00 0.58 0 0.90 1.25 1 0.75 1.17 1 0.39 4.00 3.5 1.60 5 21 0.57 1 0.51 0.52 0 0.98 1.10 1 0.44 0.95 1 0.50 3.14 3 1.68 S5

Figure S1. 10000 1000 r=0.18 p=0.28 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Hg (µg/ kg) 100 Site 5 10 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 Total Taphonomic Grade Comparison of the overall taphonomic state of the dead-collected shells (i.e., the extent of physico-chemical shell alteration) and the Hg content of shells (log-scale) collected from the five targeted sites along the river. Each data point represents a single specimen. Symbols: r Spearman rank correlation coefficient, p probability that r = 0. S6