FISHERIES POLICY OF ICELAND

Similar documents
A reformed CFP needs to be based on sustainability, and use the principle of caution

Science-based management of fish stocks and long-term sustainability

Sustainable Fisheries for Future Generations The Fisheries White Paper

FISHERIES CO-OPERATION ICELAND AND NORWAY WITH. Presented by Philip Rodgers ERINSHORE ECONOMICS

FISHERY BY-PRODUCT REPORT

Screening report Croatia

MINISTRTY OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FOOD

OCEAN2012 Transforming European Fisheries

2018 COM Doc. No. COC-303_Appendix 1 / oct.-18 (11:37 )

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European Eel.

How illegal discarding. failing EU fisheries. and citizens. How illegal discarding in. fisheries and citizens. Executive summary

WHAT IS THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR RESPONSIBLE FISHERIES?

WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 May 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0364 (COD) PE-CONS 76/12 PECHE 549 ENV 952 CODEC 3067 OC 765

QUOTAS -Setting and Sharing

Consultation Document

Comparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare

Report No. 27 to the Storting

Rebuilding depleted Baltic fish stocks lessons learned

Inter-RAC Conference Decision-making within a reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)

Screening report Montenegro

BSAC recommendations for the fishery in the Baltic Sea in 2018

Fast Tracking the Development of Environmental- Friendly Fishing Methods

Using Fishermen s Expertise to Improve Fisheries Management

SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA FOR FISHERIES SUBSIDIES: THE LATIN AMERICAN CONTEXT

COMMISSIO STAFF WORKI G PAPER. Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment. Accompanying the document

By-Catch and Discard Management: The Key to Achieving Responsible and Sustainable Fisheries in Europe

Statement of the World Forum of Fisher People To the FAO Conference on Small Scale Fisheries, Bangkok, 2008

Whole Fish Fishery Assessment Examples and Conditions Document

17-06 BFT RECOMMENDATION BY ICCAT FOR AN INTERIM CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WESTERN ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA

Northeast Atlantic Mackerel, Handlines

LEGALISED OVERFISHING

Fishing opportunities for 2018 under the Common Fisheries Policy

10.4 Advice May 2014

Screening report Serbia

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

The EU experience in implementation

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EU REGULATION 1967/2006

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Economic benefits of healthy fisheries.

STUDENTS BRIEF. The Scottish Fishing Industry: A Survey of the Catching Sector

BY CATCH IN NORWAY. HOW IT WORKS?

Council CNL(16)31. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under the Implementation Plan for the Calendar Year EU - Finland

4.9 92,000. Healthy fisheries are good for business How better management of European fisheries will create jobs and improve the economy

Andrew A. Rosenberg University of New Hampshire, USA

Advice June Capelin in Subareas V and XIV and Division IIa west of 5 W (Iceland East Greenland Jan Mayen area).

Rapporteur: Seppo KALLIO

NEMO PROJECT SCIENTIFIC MONITORING PLAN

Why has the cod stock recovered in the North Sea?

HADDOCK ON THE SOUTHERN SCOTIAN SHELF AND IN THE BAY OF FUNDY (DIV. 4X/5Y)

Recovery of European fish stocks and the Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy

Council of the European Union Brussels, 6 December 2018 (OR. en)

Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in Subarea 8 (Bay of Biscay)

Sustainable coastal fishery in the Baltic Sea in Jurkalne, Latvia

FISHERY BY-PRODUCT REPORT

establishing further emergency measures in 2017 and 2018 for small pelagic stocks in the Adriatic Sea (GSA 17 and GSA 18)

Fisheries Management Standard. Version 2.0

Implications of reducing Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) minimum size (MLS/MCRS) in the Skagerrak and Kattegat area (IIIa).

Re: Consultation on the addition of narwhal and two bowhead whale populations to the SARA List

Norwegian fisheries and aquaculture management

Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)

now! successful recovery plans Essential guide to for Europe s fish stocks Europe s fish stocks need sustainable recovery plans

REDFISH in Sub-areas I and II. Nominal catch (t) by countries in Sub-area I, Divisions IIa and IIb combined as officially reported to ICES.

THE NORWEGIAN MANAGEMENT OF THE RED KING CRAB. Guri Hjallen Eriksen The Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs,

European fishing fleet capacity management

The Transformation Status of Marine Commercial Fisheries. and Marine Aquaculture in South Africa

Fast tracking the development of environmentally-friendly fishing methods

Position of WWF Mongolia Program Office on current situation of Argali hunting and conservation in Mongolia

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. Consultation on Fishing Opportunities for 2011

SUMMARY OF PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS

1. (1) The title of these regulations is the Enforcement of Sea Fishing Conventions Order, 2011.

Angling Trust Save Our Sea Bass Bass Position Statement 2018

( ) Page: 1/5 PROPOSED DISCIPLINES ON PROHIBITIONS AND SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT FOR FISHERIES SUBSIDIES. Proposal from Indonesia

Recognising however that an interim management measure for deep pelagic redfish in 2018 in the Irminger Sea and adjacent waters is required;

Evaluation of effects of management options for the recreational cod fishery in the western Baltic Sea

Final Draft Integrated Fishery Management Plan. Summary

Improvements in bêche-de-mer fishery through sustainable harvesting in Fiji Islands: An overview

Mr Joao AGUIAR MACHADO Director General Directorate General Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Rue de la Loi Brussels BELGIUM

1. TAC and quota allocation between Contracting Parties for the deep pelagic fishery

The costs of IUU fishing to the EU

ICES Advisory Approach

COUNTRY NOTE ON NATIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS -- SPAIN

13196/16 AS/JGC/sr DGB 2A

4.9.5 Norwegian spring-spawning herring

Effective Collaboration Between Scientists, Managers and Policy Makers

MEDAC OPINION ON THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN RECREATIONAL (RF)AND SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES (SSF) IN THE MEDITERRANEAN WATERS

Arctic Frontiers, Tromsø, January 24 th Thorbjørn Thorvik, Senior adviser. The Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries.

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

MOVING TO RIGHTS BASED MANAGEMENT: GREEN-LIPPED MUSSEL CASE STUDY. Martin Workman, Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand,

Fisheries Unit Welsh Government Rhodfa Padarn Llanbadarn Fawr Aberystwyth SY23 3UR 15 November 2013

Global State of IUU. Evidence-based risk assessments (sustainability, legality and traceability). John Pearce

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy

Time is running out for bluefin tuna, sharks and other great pelagic fish. Oceana Recommendations for the ICCAT Commission meeting November 2008

A8-0377/

Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal Indian mackerel fishery

Le hareng est une de ces productions naturelles dont l emploi décide de la destinée des Empires (Lacépède 1801)

Haddock, Iceland, ICES Va, Danish Seine

L 198/8 Official Journal of the European Union

The landings obligation in view of different management regimes

Transcription:

ISSN 1330 061X CODEN RIBAEG UDK:6392/.3(491.1) Professional paper FISHERIES POLICY OF ICELAND T. Treer, O. Skarphedinsson 2 Summary Fisheries has recently been very exploited area in the Croatian media, either regarding the EU accession negotiations or regarding the interrelationships of the involved parties within Croatia. Iceland is one of the strongest fishery nations in the world that passed through some heavy struggles to protect its fishery grounds (so called fishery or cod wars ). Therefore its experience in fisheries can be useful when creating Croatian fishery policy. So, the aim of this article is to present the Statement on Responsible Fisheries in Iceland signed by all the parties involved in the Icelandic fishery industry. Key words: Iceland, Croatia, responsible fisheries, fisheries policy INTRODUCTION As an ascendant country to European Union, Croatia faces many issues that need to be dealt with. One of the priorities is the implementation of Croatian Protected Ecological and Fisheries Zone. As Croatian neighbouring EU countries Italy and Slovenia are firm opponents to this action, the problem will, of course, be solved at the political level. Hence, the aim of this article is only to give the information on the fishery policy of Iceland as one of the strongest fishery nations in the world (Fig. 1). Jon Baldvin Hannibalsson, under whose presidency Iceland became the first country to recognize Croatia s independence, recommended in his recent interview for the Croatian media (Ore{i}, 2007) that Croatia should not disclaim its program for protection of its marine zone. Moreover, Mr. Hannibalsson accentuated that before entering EU, Croatia should make a precise contract with Italy and Slovenia on fishery quotas, bordering lines and other details concerning management in the Adriatic. Prof. dr. Tomislav Treer, Department of Fisheries, Beekeeping and Special Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Croatia, e mail: treer@agr.hr, Prof. dr. Ossur Skarphedinsson, Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism, Government of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, e mail: ssur@althingi.is 69

Ribarstvo 66, 2008, (2), 67 71 Fig. 1. Reykjavík harbor is full of fishing boats of all sizes. Slika 1. Luka u Reykjaviku puna je ribarskih brodova svih veli~ina. THE STATEMENT ON RESPONSIBLE FISHERIES IN ICELAND Although Iceland is situated at the other side of the continent and has different geopolitical position, its experience in fisheries can be useful when creating Croatian fisheries policy (Fig. 2). Iceland being a small country far in the north Atlantic ocean, although neighbourless passed through some heavy struggles to protect its fishery grounds (so called fishery or cod wars ). Fishery in Iceland is one of the most important sources of income. With the related industries it contributes significantly to GDP and to 70% of the export. It also employs 4% of human resources. These facts also place Iceland among the countries with the highest rate of yearly fish consumption per capita (91.5 kg). Therefore, the fishery policy belongs to the main political, economical and preservation issues of Iceland, aiming to secure both, good life and sufficient resources for future generations. Consequently, in August 7th 2007 all the parties involved in the Icelandic fishery industry signed The Statement on Responsible Fisheries in Iceland. It was signed by the Minister of Fishe- 70

Fig 2. The fish biologist Össur Skarphé insson (on the photo with the president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo of The Philippines), promotes the use of geothermal energy as the Icelandic Minister responsible for energy. Slika 2. Ribarski biolog Össur Skarphé insson (na slici s filipinskom predsjednicom Glorijom Macapagal Arroyo), kao islandski ministar za energiju promovira uporabu geotermalne energije ries, Einar K. Gu finnsson (Fig. 3) and representatives of the Marine Research Institute, Jóhann Sigurjónsson, Directorate of Fisheries, ór ur Ásgeirsson and Fisheries Association of Iceland, Pétur Bjarnason. The entire text of the statement can be reached on the Internet (Anonimous, 2007). Here, we will only present the Abstract of it: Fig. 3. Icelandic Minister of Fisheries Einar Kristinn Gu finnsson was the first reviewer of this paper. Slika 3. Islandski ministar ribarstva Einar Kristinn Gu finnsson bio je prvi recenzent ovoga ~lanka. 71

1. Sustainable and responsible fisheries are fundamental to the Icelandic fishing industry as one of the principal pillars in Iceland s economy. Fisheries management is based on extensive scientific research, responsible allocation of fishing rights and effective monitoring and enforcement of management decisions. 2. Stock assessment and scientific advice by the Marine Research Institute are the basis for the total allowable catch (TAC) allocation from each stock. Icelandic fisheries scientists are members of international scientific organizations and their work and methods are constantly evaluated to ensure conformity with demands that meet international scientific criteria. 3. Iceland operates a system of individual transferable quotas (ITQs). All commercially important stocks are subject to catch limitations by a TAC issued every year and quotas for individual vessels are allocated on that basis. The quotas represent shares in the TAC for each stock. The shares are permanent, and freely transferable. 4. Effective control of landings is fundamental in responsible fisheries management. Landings are weighed by certified harbour officials and regularly monitored by inspectors from the Directorate of Fisheries. Landings are reported on a daily basis. Inspectors also check fishing gear, catch composition and handling on board. Conformity between reported landings, reported sales of fish for processing and reported export of products is checked on a regular basis. Violation of fisheries management legislation is punishable, whether it is caused by intent or negligence. Discards are prohibited and punishable by law. 5. Research on fishing gear and its impact on the marine habitat further underpins knowledge of the ecosystem of the ocean around Iceland. 6. Complete area closures or limitations on fishing gear are in force for protection of juveniles, spawning areas and vulnerable habitats. 7. Systematic research in the Icelandic fisheries goes back 70 years but their management continues to be a process of improvements and learning. In recent years, the ecosystem approach to the fisheries management has become a field of concerted research. This statement is a part of information on the Icelandic fishing industry and the measures taken to ensure responsible fisheries and the proper treatment of the marine ecosystem around Iceland. The statement is intended for everyone concerned about the status of the fish stocks and responsible fisheries, particularly the numerous parties that purchase and consume Icelandic fish products. 72

CONCLUSIONS Croatia created its fisheries strategy several years ago (@imbrek, 2001) and has a competent team of negotiators with EU. Nevertheless, these important, yet simple and easily understood statements from the potent fishery country as Iceland, may assist Croatia in the conviction that it is possible to orchestrate quite opposite interests to the advantage of common welfare. Sa`etak ISLANDSKA RIBARSKA POLITIKA T. Treer, O. Skarphedinsson Ribarstvo je u posljednje vrijeme medijski vrlo eksploatirano podru~je, kako u pregovorima oko ulaska Hrvatske u EU, tako i u odnosima me u razli~itim zainteresiranim stranama unutar Hrvatske. Island je, kao jedna od najja~ih ribarskih nacija u svijetu, svojedobno pro{ao kroz velike borbe u nastojanju da za{titi svoja ribarska podru~ja (tzv. ribarski ili bakalarski ratovi), pa njegovo ribarsko iskustvo mo`e biti korisno u kreiranju hrvatske ribarske politike. Stoga je cilj ovoga ~lanka prikazati Dogovor o odgovornom ribarstvu na Islandu, koji su potpisale sve strane uklju~ene u islandsku ribarsku industriju. Klju~ne rije~i: Island, Hrvatska, odgovorno ribarstvo, ribarska politika REFERENCES Anonimous (2007): Abstract of the Statement on Responsible Fisheries in Iceland (http: //www.fisheries.is/policy. htm) Ore{i} B. (2007): ^ovjek koji je prvi priznao Hrvatsku. Globus, 889, 116 122. @imbrek T. (ed.), (2001): Hrvatska u 21. stolje}u. Ured za strategiju razvitka Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb, 159 175. Received: 5. 5. 2008. Accepted: 16. 6. 2008. Prof. dr. Tomislav Treer, Zavod za ribarstvo, p~elarstvo i specijalnu zoologiju, Agronomski fakultet Sveu~ili{ta u Zagrebu, Hrvatska, e mail: treer@agr.hr; prof. dr. Ossur Skarphedinsson, Ministarstvo industrije, energije i turizma, Vlada Islanda, Reykjavik, Island, e mail: ossur@althingi.is 73

74 Ribarstvo 66, 2008, (2), 69 73