What Is a Complete Street?

Similar documents
INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Road Diets FDOT Process

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Off-road Trails. Guidance

General Design Factors

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

Transportation Planning Division

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bicycle + Pedestrian Connectivity Gap Analysis

Classification Criteria

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 3 Curb Ramps & Blended Transitions

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street


Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

Who is Toole Design Group?

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Complete Streets Design Considerations. Second Street Corridor Complete Streets Workshop and Assessment Manchester, NH April 26, 2013

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Monroe Street Reconstruction

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Complete Streets Accessible Networks for an Age-Friendly World

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

Defining Purpose and Need

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

Chapter 6: Along the Street

March 2008 FINAL DRAFT. Supplemental Bikeway Design Guidelines

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

RE: Park Plaza Walgreens (P12-016)

Pedestrian Safety at Interchanges

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Freeway System Considerations

This page intentionally left blank.

INTERSECTION DESIGN TREATMENTS

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR STREET BANNER APPLICATION PACKAGE

6.4 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Safe Routes to School Action Plan Aberdeen, Idaho

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

Living Streets Policy

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

8/1/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Complete Streets: Planning, Policy & Performance

Land Use Bicycle Spaces Required Type Residential

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

10/30/2012 VIA

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

11/28/2016 VIA

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

Walking Along the Road. Module 2

Frequently Asked Questions

Technical Memorandum. Shoulder Width Standards for State Highways. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction. Purpose

Transcription:

Session 5 Charleen Zimmer, AICP, Zan Associates May 5-7, 2010 What Is a Complete Street? May 2010 5-1

Not a Complete Street More of a Complete Street May 2010 5-2

Benefits of Complete Streets Safety for all modes Mobility and access Health Transportation capacity Economic activity and property values Quality of life National Complete Streets Status 2000 US DOT Guidance: Bicycling and walking facilities will be incorporated into all transportation projects unless exceptional circumstances exist Few jurisdictions embrace or follow this guidance May 2010 5-3

Complete Streets Status in Minnesota HF 3800 passed in May 2008 Feasibility and cost-benefit report to Legislature in December 2009 Legislation currently pending Hennepin, Ramsey and Carver Counties and cities of Rochester and Duluth have developed formal policies All users should receive attention in the design process for all projects Many decisions must be made early in the planning and design process But, many detailed design issues arise later in the design process May 2010 5-4

Consider Level of Service for All Pedestrians Bicyclists Vehicles Trucks Cars Transit Vehicles Transit Users Parking Same Needs Different Solutions Interstate Rural Highway Urban Arterial Local Road Peak Period LOS Mobility Mobility and Peak Period LOS Local Access Overpass Crossings Shoulder Operations Sidewalks and Crosswalks Sidewalks Shoulder Operations Park-n-Ride Lots Bus Shelter Bus Stop Overpass Crossings Shoulder Operations or Trail On-Street Bike Lanes or Multi-Use Trail Share the Road Grade Separation At- Grade or Grade Separation At- Grade or Grade Separation At- Grade May 2010 5-5

Massachusetts Approach Be Aware Of: ADA requirements Modal priorities and space allocation Pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes Access to transit Modal conflicts Pedestrian/bicycle volumes Quality of walking environment May 2010 5-6

Hennepin Avenue Before Hennepin Ave crash data May 2010 5-7

Hennepin Avenue - After 1 st Avenue - After May 2010 5-8

1 st Avenue - Bike Boxes Transit Characteristics Frequency/loadings Pedestrian & bicycle access Safety and personal security Lighting Near and farside stops Signal preemption Shelter design and maintenance May 2010 5-9

Snow Removal Is a Big Issue Bicyclist Characteristics May 2010 5-10

Urban Bikeway Design Source: Bikeway Facility Design Manual Snow Removal May 2010 5-11

Pedestrian Characteristics Pedestrians with Walking Difficulty Older people Children Persons with disabilities Physical Wheelchair (manual, motorized or scooters) Walkers, crutches, canes Visual Low vision Blind (cane or guide dog) Hearing Cognitive May 2010 5-12

Pedestrian Networks: Common Problems Missing sidewalks Unusually long blocks Natural barriers Freeways Other barriers Pedestrian Networks: Best Practices Sidewalks on both sides of every street Pedestrian short-cuts through unusually long blocks Small blocks where new streets are constructed Maintaining the street grid across barriers Bridges May 2010 5-13

Sidewalk Corridors: Common Problems Insufficient width for people and all the other stuff Too close to moving traffic for comfort No space for trees and street furniture Street furniture obstructs direct walking path Narrow corridors are even narrower with snow Sidewalks: Best Practices Zone system with minimum widths Curb Extension Minimum acceptable width: 12 feet May 2010 5-14

Best practices: Curb extensions Use curb extension to maximize space for desired elements Especially where sidewalk corridor is less than 12 feet Transit shelters Creative Uses of Parking Lane May 2010 5-15

Bridges: Common Problems Narrow sidewalks s Sidewalk on only one side Next to moving traffic (often higher speed) No adjacent land uses No escape route Matching into adjoining i facilities Expensive to build and to modify Bridges (and under): Best Practices Use same zone philosophy p as for sidewalks Sufficient space for snow clearance equipment (jeep) On bridges connecting to off-street trails, sidewalks should be sufficiently wide to accommodate both pedestrians and bicycles Bridges should have pedestrian-scale lighting May 2010 5-16

Street Corners: Common Problems Insufficient space for people, curb ramps and other stuff Curb ramp condition, placement and design Lack of obstructionfree area Curb Ramp Problems May 2010 5-17

Best Practice: Clear Corner Zones No obstructions Street furniture Vegetation Utilities Priority use: accessible ramps and pedestrian call buttons at signals Best Practice: Small Corner Radius Particularly on narrow sidewalks More space for two perpendicular curb ramps Better aligns sidewalk, curb ramp and crosswalk Slows the speed of turning vehicles Shortens crossing May 2010 5-18

Best Practice: Curb Ramp Design 2 ramps per corner Avoid diagonal ramps No steep slopes Align with sidewalk and crosswalk, while maintaining level landing Option returned edge next to planted boulevard Easier for snow removal Street Crossings: Common Problems Wide crossings Poor visibility Turning vehicle conflicts Speeding vehicles Faded crosswalk markings May 2010 5-19

Lane Width Trade-Offs Wider lanes: allow for higher speeds reduce lane departure crashes Narrower lanes: reduce right-of-way needs lessen pedestrian crossing time Best Practices: Crosswalks May 2010 5-20

Best Practices: Refuge Islands Provides space to enable pedestrian crossings one direction at a time Reduces vehicle speeds Provides better placement for signal poles Best Practices: Pedestrian Signals Designs that clearly communicate available crossing time Accessible push buttons with clear indication of crossing direction policy APS on all new signals May 2010 5-21

Roundabouts Ped/Bike Challenge Cross Walk Location Courtesy: Lenters May 2010 5-22

Bike Ramp Design 45 angle; short taper, located in taper Cyclists Can Choose May 2010 5-23

Example: Excelsior Blvd. 11 foot lanes no shoulders 35 mph Turn lanes store 2 vehicles Tapers 10:1 on turn lanes; 5:1 for parking bays Crash reduction over 55% Example: Excelsior Blvd. Landscaped median Access management Pedestrian amenities Transit oriented development May 2010 5-24

Example: Excelsior Blvd. Curb extensions for ped crossings 8 foot parking bays Mix of near side and far side transit stops Wider boulevards Exercise May 2010 5-25