Recommended Alternatives

Similar documents
An Overview: 5000 MW Ultramega Solar Park at Dholera. For the positive response to Expression of Interest (EoI)

Washington St. Corridor Study

Geometric Style Die Head Chasers

Washington St. Corridor Study

windpro WP A15-Lingewaard WTGs Shadow receptor-input

Premium Report 27/07/2017

PUBLIC INPUT MEETING. WHEN? December 15, 2011 Open House: 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. (CDT) Formal Presentation at 7:30 p.m.

4.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee

City of Moorhead Committee of the Whole Meeting

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

Frequently Asked Questions

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

Clybourn Ave. Protected Bike Lane Study Halsted St. to Division St.

CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Executive Summary. September 3, 2014

6.4 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

Geometric Design Tables

Chapter 3.9 Timbercrest Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. November 2008

102 Avenue Corridor Review

PEM-EX-C. Figure: PEM-EX-C*A*G. ka054000en; Rev. 2.7 J

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: December 13, 2017 MPO Executive Board: December 20, 2017

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: May 10, 2017 MPO Executive Board: May 17, 2017

Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation

PLEASE NOTE THAT ILLUSTRATIONS ARE NOT TO SCALE! Commentary gives size in mm s

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

Gene Dillon Elementary School Traffic Study Division Street Site

ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK (ALL JURISDICTIONS)

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Designing with the Railroad

Walk Description. Directions

Ottawa Beach Road Study

ROUTE 22 CORRIDOR STUDY: CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX A A-12

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Station Plan: Penn & 43rd Avenue

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

WHEREAS delivery trucks also pass through the Narrows, into the northern parking lot, to loading docks in the back of the building.

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Forest Hills Improvement Initiative

The Year Ahead: Virginia Department of Transportation Northern Virginia District

Off-road Trails. Guidance

19 July 2016 OUR REF:

2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Blair/Williamson Intersection Expressed Needs

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

Lincoln Way Multimodal Safety and Operations Study. City and University Summary Presentation

Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

About the study. North Milwaukee Ave. Key goals of this study are to: Achieve Vision Zero* by. Harmonize the space and improve walkability

CW20-1D 48" X 48" (Flags- See note 1) G " X 24" (See note 2)

Shenango Valley MPO. State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Table 1.0 Grade Crossing Enhancements PVL San Jacinto Branch Line

HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

42nd Ave N Reconstruction

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Bridge Street Corridor Study Report

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Municipal Class EA To Address Traffic Congestion On The Ontario Street Corridor (Grand Bend) Public Information Meeting June 4, 2018

Held by Held by Held by Secondary. Total Primary Secondary Special/ Federation

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

PROJECT FACT SHEET May 25, 2018

Delaware Avenue Corridor Study

Supersedes: RP1(495) Form RP1 (1102)

Agenda Item # Page # RECOMMENDATION

NOTICE OF PREPARATION. Environmental Programs 3331 North First Street, Building B-2 San Jose, CA

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

PROJECT FACT SHEET March 21, 2018

Hennepin Avenue Reconstruction Washington Avenue to 12 th Street

5.0 Roadway System Plan

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Readington Road (C.R. 637) Construction

Approximately 360 trail users cross during a typical summer weekday and 420 cross during a typical summer

Multi-Modal Traffic Analysis. Parisi and Associates

Description: Widen I-64 to 6 lanes from I-265 to the KY 53 interchange in Shelby County.

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects

Transcription:

62

Corridor Improvements As part of the Washington Street Corridor Study, improvement recommendations were developed to address vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle and transit transportation needs within the corridor. The purpose of formulating recommendations is to identify the alternatives that most effectively meet the overall study goal of creating a safe, efficient and harmonic transportation environment for all road users while limiting business impacts. Recommendations are subject to change based upon new or varied information uncovered during project development. Vehicular Improvements Recommendation: Reconstruct the Corridor With Existing Basic Lane Configuration With the exception of the corridor section south of Hammerling Avenue, the original pavement section along the Washington Street corridor was built between 1940 and 1964. Structural overlays have maintained acceptable rideability and roadway conditions throughout the corridor except underneath the BNSF Railway Bridge structure. The section of corridor has been limited to rehabilitation efforts due to vertical clearance constraints underneath the bridge. At some point in the future, the pavement along the corridor will approach the end of its useful life. At this time, either an additional structural overlay or a full roadway reconstruction should be considered. In conjunction with the City and State s pavement management plan, it is recommended the corridor be reconstructed sometime within the study horizon to maintain a suitable driving surface. The existing lane configuration is recommended to be reconstructed with 12-foot wide lanes. This allows for an additional four feet throughout the corridor to be used for widening sidewalks. Discarded Alternative: Temporary Roadway Rehabilitation Only Pavement rehabilitation such as structural overlays may temporarily extend the lifespan of the roadway section along Washington Street. However, these improvements do not improve the base sections of the roadway that continue to deteriorate. Based upon the current age of the base pavement on Washington Street north of Hammerling Avenue, it is anticipated that this base section will reach or nearly approach the end of its useful life sometime before 2035. Furthermore, exclusive pavement rehabilitation eliminates the option to narrow the roadway cross-section which limits any potential pedestrian and ADA related improvements. Temporary rehabilitation efforts are not discarded as a potential improvement alternative for this section of the corridor; however, they were discarded as the only required alternative through the study horizon year of 2035. Discarded Alternative: Positive Offset Turn-Lanes Ideally, roadways are configured to prevent left-turn lanes with negative or no offset. Turn-lanes with negative or no offset reduce sight distance for left-turning vehicles due to the presence of a vehicle in the opposing left-turn lane obstructing the view of oncoming motorists. To modify the lane configuration to a positive offset alignment would require, at minimum, 12 feet of additional ROW. The option was discarded for business impact considerations. Additionally, all locations with left-turn crash rates higher than anticipated were addressed through site specific improvement strategies. 63

FIGURE 7.1 Illustration of Negative, No and Positive Offset Left-Turn Lanes Recommendation: Implement Access Management Plan An access management plan was prepared to reduce conflicts and crashes based upon a review of existing property uses, access locations and crash history. Although complete access control is impractical due to business functionality and mobility concerns, opportunities exist to improve mid-block traffic flow through implementation of driveway modifications. The strategy eliminated redundant access points onto Washington Street, relocated access points from Washington Street to side-streets or alleyways with low traffics volumes or consolidated adjacent property access points. It is important to note closed driveways may divert traffic to alleyways that formerly experienced minimal traffic volumes. In response to the changes in travel patterns, all unpaved alleyways that are anticipated to experience higher traffic volumes post-reconstruction are recommended to be paved. The strategy removed 100 percent of the driveways onto Washington Street north of DeMers Avenue and 71 percent of the driveways south of DeMers Avenue (refer to FIGURES 7.2 A-7.2 C and Tables 7.1 A and 7.1B for documentation of the recommended access management plan). It is important to note that inactive driveways are documented in TABLE 7.1 A and 7.1B. Inactive accesses within the corridor are the result of several car dealerships and autobody shops along the corridor that have one or more of their driveways blocked by parked vehicles. It is important to consider these access points in the event that a driveway is utilized in the future by the current business or in the event that these sites are redeveloped. 64

Washington S t. C orridor S tudy Washington St. Corridor Study Consolidated Access S Remaining Access Grand Forks - East Grand Forks MPO Access Management Plan W N E LEGEND Removed Access FIGURE 7.2 A Access Management Plan 65

Washington St. Corridor Study Remaining Access Consolidated Access S Removed Access Grand Forks - East Grand Forks MPO Access Management Plan W N E LEGEND Washington S t. C orridor S tudy FIGURE 7.2 B Access Management Plan 66

Washington S t. C orridor S tudy Remaining Access Consolidated Access S Washington St. Corridor Study E Removed Access Grand Forks - East Grand Forks MPO Access Management Plan W N LEGEND FIGURE 7.2 C Access Management Plan 67

TABLE 7.1 A Access Management Plan Removed Access ID 1 Impacted Business Lucky Inn 2 Burger King Remaining Access ID Y AA X Location of Remaining Access Point(s) Hammerling Ave Washington St Washington St service road C-1 Washington St 3 Simonson's C-1 Washington St AD 14th Ave S 4 Valley Dairy AB AC 14th Ave S 5, 8 Hyundai-Eide Motors AF 14th Ave S AH 13th Ave S 6 Family Dental AE 14th Ave S 7 Firelite Studio C-2 Washington St 9, 10 South Washington Center 11, 14 McDonald's AI AN 13th Ave S 12th Ave S C-3 Washington St AP Notes shared with Simonson's New Consolidated access point shared with Burger King shared with Taco Bell shared with Pita Pit 12, 13, 15 Mark's Quick Stop AO 12th Ave S 16 O'Reilly's Auto Parts AU 11th Ave S C-4 Washington St shared with Payday Express 17 Taco John's AR Washington St Shared with Pita Pit AS Shared with Pita Pit AT Shared with Payday Express 18, 20 Quizno's & Verizon Wireless AV 11th Ave S AX 19 Payday Express C-4 Washington St shared with Taco John's C-5 Washington St shared with Elite Property Mgmt 21 Denny's Tavern AW 22 23 Elite Property Management LLC Garrell's Sports Center & Hockey Zone 24 Paradiso 25, 26, 27 Jay Holm's Valley Auto Sale 1-B Washington St BA BB AZ BC BE BF BD BG 10th Ave S 10th Ave S 10th Ave S 10th Ave S 9th Ave S shared with Denny's Tavern Driveways 25 and 26 are currently inactive 68

TABLE 7.1 B Access Management Plan Removed Access ID Access Management Impacted Business 28, 30 Plain and Fancy Antique Mall 29 Paradiso 31 Cenex 32, 33 Italian Moon 34 Liberty Income Tax, Budget Music, & Wall Medicine Center 35, 36 KFC 37, 38, 40 Vacant (Formerly Mi Mexico) 39 Sinclair & B and N Auto Plaza 41 Charles L. Bridgeford DDS, Edward Jones, & Center for 42, 43 Twin City Motors 44 Vacant (Formerly Tom and Jerry's Dugout) 45, 46 Art and Learn Remaining Access ID BI BL BH BJ Location of Remaining Access Point(s) 9th Ave S C-6 Washington St C-6 Washington St BN BO BM BP BQ BR BS BT BX CA CC BW BY BZ CB CD CF CE CG CI CK CJ CL 8th Ave S 8th Ave S 8th Ave S 7th Ave S 7th Ave S 7th Ave S West alley Washington St West alley 1st Ave N 1st Ave N 2nd Ave N 2nd Ave N Trip Reassignment Notes shared with Cenex shared with Cenex Driveway 42 is currently inactive 47 Auto World 48, 50 Cenex 49 Twin City Motors 51 Twin City Motors 52, 55 Vacant (Formerly Blockbuster) 53, 54, 56 Valley Dairy 57 Northern Motors 58, 59 Family Auto CN CO CQ CR CT CS CU CS CU CV CX CY CW CZ DC DE DN DP 2nd Ave N 2nd Ave N 4th Ave N 7th Ave N Driveway 49 is currently inactive Driveway 51 is currently inactive Driveway 57 is currently inactive Driveway 58 is currently inactive 69