PLAN 20 PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK

Similar documents
Daleston Masterplan Traffic & Transport Assessment

Barwon Heads Road, Armstrong Creek Traffic Impact Assessment Prepared for: Newland Developers Pty Ltd

TRANSPORT AND MOVEMENT

Minta Farm Berwick S96A Transport Impact Assessment

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

Liveable Neighbourhoods Design Code and Policy

Classification Criteria

Anniedale - Tynehead NCP. Transportation Highway 15 & Golden Ears Way Analysis

Traffic and Transport Assessment

Transit boulevard: A new road type for Sydney s Growth Centres

Minta Farm Precinct Structure Plan

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Frome Street Bicycle Route

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Berwick Health and Education Precinct: Casey Amendment C207 (Part 1) Submission to Planning Panels Victoria

2. Infrastructure Project Justification

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Strategy for Walking & Cycling Action Plan

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

SC6.17 Planning scheme policy for the transport and parking code

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

Services Department A September 18, 2006 Region of Durham Recommended Arterial Corridor All Wards Guidelines Study

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Classification 2

A5.1 Permitted activities

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

COUNCIL POLICY. Document No: CPL260.5 Approval Date: 23 March 2010 Obstruction

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Response to further information request Ministry of Education Notice of Requirement (200 & 252 Park Estate Road)

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

DRAFT OPERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC ROADS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA DRAFT VERSION 2

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Callan Park accommodates travel from a wide range of transport modes, including walking, cycling, bus and light rail.

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Devonport City Cycling Network Strategy

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

SCHEME DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

Living Streets Policy

Roadways. Roadways III.

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

APPENDIX L. Design Criteria

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

TGSI Tactile Ground Surface Indicators

Review of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

10 SHERFORD Town Code

guide to a phased approach TRIPP

CURRENT ORIGINAL REFERENCE SECTIONS. (Typical Section) (Typical Section) The Parade Island Bay : Concept Option Summary Sheets.

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

The Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Aurang Zeb - Head of Highways & Transport

Auckland Transport Code of Practice 2013

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINE NO. 13

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Chapter Five: Transportation Plan

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Transportation Planning Division

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Green Streets and Urban Greenways

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Transcription:

KEY Bus Route / 400m Coverage Existing Recommended Secondary Potential Secondary Indicative Stop Locations Principle Standard Sub-regional Transit Corridor Reservation PLAN 0 PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK Date: 11 January 010

Table 8: Road Design Characteristics Category (refer Section 5.1.1) Related Cross Section in ACEPSP Road / Street Existing Reserve (metres) Ultimate Reserve (metres) Access Management Policy Indicative Vehicles per Day (VPD - maximum) Traffic Lanes Dedicated Parking Lanes Median Speed Limit (Maximum) Bus Compatible Property Access On Road Cycle Lane Shared Path (.5 metres) Footpath (1.5 metres) Construction Responsibility * Funding Responsibility Trigger for construction A NA Surf Coast Highway (land and construction) NA Surf Coast Highway intersection with Burvilles Road NA Surf Coast Highway intersection with southern East-West Connector NA Surf Coast Highway intersection with South West Connector A NA Barwon Heads Road (land and construction) NA Barwon Heads Road intersection with Burvilles Road extension 40 40 * AMP *** 5,000 6 0 Yes 80 yes no Yes x No As required Roads Corporation NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Roads Corporation NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Roads Corporation NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Roads Corporation 40 40 * AMP *** 9,000 (through ACEP) 4 0 Yes 80 Yes No Yes x No As required Roads Corporation NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Roads Corporation Roads Corporation Major activity centre precinct DCP (50:50 split with Armstrong Creek West Precinct) DCP (50:50 split with Armstrong Creek West Precinct) Roads Corporation Developer for type C intersection; DCP for signalisation of single carriageway; Roads Corporation for duplicated carriageway As required As required for major activity centre Before opening of fourth leg on intersection Before opening of fourth leg on intersection As required As required but signalisation before opening of fourth road leg of intersection O:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\W08-7019-0060_00010 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0056_10110 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0053_161109 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP.doc 10

Category (refer Section 5.1.1) Related Cross Section in ACEPSP Road / Street Existing Reserve (metres) Ultimate Reserve (metres) Access Management Policy Indicative Vehicles per Day (VPD - maximum) Traffic Lanes Dedicated Parking Lanes Median Speed Limit (Maximum) Bus Compatible Property Access On Road Cycle Lane Shared Path (.5 metres) Footpath (1.5 metres) Construction Responsibility * Funding Responsibility Trigger for construction NA Barwon Heads Road intersection with southern East-West Connector) B Figure F Burvilles Road Interim (east boundary of Geelong Memorial Park to Horseshoe Bend Road) B C Figure G Figure H Burvilles Road Ultimate (east boundary of Geelong Memorial Park to Horseshoe Bend Road) Burvilles Road Extension (land and construction) (Horseshoe Bend Road to Barwon Heads Road) B Figure I Horseshoe Bend Road Interim NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Roads Corporation 0 43 (3 road; 0 greenway) 0 43 (3 road; 0 greenway) NA 10,400 No 60 Yes Yes - north side only NA 10,400 4 0 No 60 Yes Yes - north side only NA 4 NA 6,500 No 60 Yes Yes Yes x 0 33.4 NA 11,300 0 No 60 Yes Yes (west side only) Yes x Yes x Yes x Yes in 'gree nway' Yes in 'gree nway' Developer for type C intersection; DCP for signalisation of single carriageway; Roads Corporation for signalisation of duplicated carriageway Yes x 1 Developer DCP (50:50 split of land with Horseshoe Bend Precinct); developer (share of construction) As required but signalisation before opening of fourth road leg ofof intersection As abutting Yes x 1 CoGG CoGG As required Yes Yes x 1 Developer DCP (only cost of pavement wider than typical local access street); developer for remainder and any overall costs above DCP payments No Yes x Developer DCP (land only); developer As abutting As abutting O:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\W08-7019-0060_00010 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0056_10110 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0053_161109 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP.doc 103

Category (refer Section 5.1.1) Related Cross Section in ACEPSP Road / Street Existing Reserve (metres) Ultimate Reserve (metres) Access Management Policy Indicative Vehicles per Day (VPD - maximum) Traffic Lanes Dedicated Parking Lanes Median Speed Limit (Maximum) Bus Compatible Property Access On Road Cycle Lane Shared Path (.5 metres) Footpath (1.5 metres) Construction Responsibility * Funding Responsibility Trigger for construction B Figure J Horseshoe Bend Road Interim plus Service Road B Figure K Horseshoe Bend Road Ultimate 0 33.4 NA 11,300 + service road 1 - service road Yes 60 Yes Yes (direct on west side; service road on east side) 0 33.4 NA 11,300 4 0 Yes 60 Yes Yes Yes x Yes x No Yes x Developer Developer As abutting No Yes x CoGG DCP (land only); CoGG As required D (type C); B (sign als) A (sign als for duplic ated road) NA Horseshoe Bend Road intersection with southern East-West Connector NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Developer / CoGG Ddeveloper for type C intersection; DCP for signalisation of single carriageway; CoGG for signalisation of duplicated carriageway Before opening of fourth leg on intersection C Figure L Southern East- West Connector (Surf Coast Highway to Horseshoe Bend Road) 4 NA 5,400 No 60 Yes Yes Yes x No Yes x 1 (another in adjacent open space) Developer DCP (only cost of pavement wider than typical local access street); developer for remainder and any overall costs above DCP payments As abutting Formatted Table O:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\W08-7019-0060_00010 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0056_10110 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0053_161109 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP.doc 104

Category (refer Section 5.1.1) Related Cross Section in ACEPSP Road / Street Existing Reserve (metres) Ultimate Reserve (metres) Access Management Policy Indicative Vehicles per Day (VPD - maximum) Traffic Lanes Dedicated Parking Lanes Median Speed Limit (Maximum) Bus Compatible Property Access On Road Cycle Lane Shared Path (.5 metres) Footpath (1.5 metres) Construction Responsibility * Funding Responsibility Trigger for construction C C D D D D Figure M Figure N Figure O Figure P Figure O Figure Q Southern East- West Connector (Horseshoe Bend Road to Barwon Heads Road) South West Connector Charlemont Road North (north of Burvilles Road Extension) ** Charlemont Road Central (Burvilles Road Extension to southern East- West Connector) ** Charlemont Road South (south of southern East- West Connector) ** 4 NA 7,00 No 60 Yes Yes Yes x 0 NA 5,300 0 No 50 Yes Yes Yes x No Yes x Developer DCP (only cost of pavement wider than typical local access street); developer for remainder and any overall costs above DCP payments No Yes x Developer DCP (only cost of pavement wider than typical local access street); developer for remainder and any overall costs above DCP payments As abutting As abutting 0 0 NA 3,400 0 No 50 Yes Yes No No Yes x Developer Developer As abutting 0 0 NA 3,300 0 No 50 Yes Yes Yes x No Yes x Developer Developer As abutting 0 0 NA 3,700 0 No 50 Yes Yes No No Yes x Developer Developer As abutting Batten Road ** 0 0 NA 1,900 0 No 50 Yes Yes no Yes - east side only Yes x 1 Developer Developer As abutting O:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\W08-7019-0060_00010 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0056_10110 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0053_161109 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP.doc 105

Category (refer Section 5.1.1) Related Cross Section in ACEPSP Road / Street Existing Reserve (metres) Ultimate Reserve (metres) Access Management Policy Indicative Vehicles per Day (VPD - maximum) Traffic Lanes Dedicated Parking Lanes Median Speed Limit (Maximum) Bus Compatible Property Access On Road Cycle Lane Shared Path (.5 metres) Footpath (1.5 metres) Construction Responsibility * Funding Responsibility Trigger for construction D D Figure R Figure S Typical Local Access Street ** Typical Local Access Street beside public open space) ** D Figure T Typical Local Access Street (as service road to Highways) ** D Figure U 16 NA <1,000 0 No 50 No Yes No No Yes x Developer Developer As abutting 13.5 NA <1,000 0 No 50 No Yes No No Yes x 1 (another in park) Developer Developer As abutting 15 NA <1,000 1 1 No 50 No Yes No No Yes x 1 Developer Developer As abutting Access Lane ** 6-8m NA <300 1 0 No 30 No Yes No No No Developer Developer As abutting D Figure V Access Place (providing primary vehicular access to four or less dwellings) ** 13.3m (but with no court bowl or equivalent required) NA <300 0 No 30 No Yes No No Yes x 1 Developer Developer As abutting NOTES * excludes service roads; no individual property access allowed. ** includes land and full construction including non-signalised intersections (except as specified in the table), main culverts, lighting and landscaping. *** Vic Roads Access Management Policies, May 006 Version 1.0 O:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\W08-7019-0060_00010 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0056_10110 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0053_161109 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP.doc 106

4.6.3 Planning and Design Guidelines: Transport and Movement The following planning and design guidelines must be met. Connector streets (including any culverts and all related infrastructure) must be constructed progressively by proponents as part of the subdivision works (before the issue of a statement of compliance for the relevant stages). All intersections with Surf Coast Highway and Barwon Heads Road must be designed, constructed and controlled in accordance with the Precinct Investment Plan (Section 5) to the satisfaction of the responsible authority and the Roads Corporation. Subdivisions must be staged to provide for the timely connection of road links between properties and to the arterial road network to support transport and movement links (that is, walking, cycling and vehicular links). The provision must be made for any bus route and bus stop (which must have direct and safe pedestrian access connected to an existing pedestrian / sharedwalking / cycling path) where nominated by the Director of Public Transport. Walking and cycling path crossings must be provided at all relevant intersections and at the intersection of key ACEP-wide shared paths and higher order roads. Cycle parking facilities must be provided by developers in convenient and prominent locations at key destinations such as schools, community centres, activity centres and public transport interchanges. The following planning and design guidelines should be met. Development should plan for the future grade separation of the transport corridor by ensuring that sufficient land is set aside to accommodate grade separated road and rail intersections. Land areas to be set aside are to be to the satisfaction of the responsible authority (determined in consultation with the Department of Transport (including VicTrack)). In order to minimise back fences along restricted-access roads, dwellings or other land uses should be designed and sited to address, except in limited situations, those roads but be separated by internal parallel access streets, service roads or inter-connected T-head courts. Open-ended court heads at such roads may be an alternative approach but should be inter-mixed with the other design options above. Bus stop facilities constructed by proponents as part of the subdivision works (before the issue of a statement of compliance for the relevant stage or bonded) should be to a design standard approved by the Director of Public Transport. O:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\W08-7019-0060_00010 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0056_10110 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0053_161109 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP.doc 107

Bus stops should be designed as an integral part of activity centres and activity generating land uses, such as schools, community hubs and regional active public open space. Walking / cycling paths should be constructed by proponents as part of subdivision works (before the issue of a statement of compliance for the relevant stage except if the works are bonded). Bicycle lanes should be designed to allow for the smooth transition between onroad and off-road facilities. Walking / cycling paths and footpaths should be designed and located to maximize passive surveillance. The local street network should be designed to provide permeable and safe routes for walking / cycling to activity centres, community facilities, public open spaces and public transport. Road and street cross sections should be consistent generally with those in Figures F to V but with consideration of the need for adjustments within the overall specified road reserve widths if required to cater for existing utilities and existing street trees. Courts that are not inter-connected for walking / cycling permeability should be avoided. Courts where included must have a T-head, court bowl or equivalent except where providing vehicle access to four or less dwellings and garbage collection is to occur at the mouth of the court. O:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\W08-7019-0060_00010 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0056_10110 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0053_161109 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP.doc 108

East Boundary of Geelong Memorial Park to Horseshoe Bend Road FIGURE F BURVILLES ROAD INTERIM CROSS SECTION

East Boundary of Geelong Memorial Park to Horseshoe Bend Road FIGURE G BURVILLES ROAD ULTIMATE CROSS SECTION

Horseshoe Bend Road to Barwon Heads Road FIGURE H BURVILES ROAD EXTENSION CROSS SECTION

FIGURE I HORSESHOE BEND ROAD INTERIM CROSS SECTION

FIGURE J HORSESHOE BEND ROAD INTERIM PLUS SERVICE ROAD CROSS SECTION

FIGURE K HORSESHOE BEND ROAD ULTIMATE CROSS SECTION

Surf Coast Highway to Horseshoe Bend Road FIGURE PLANL SOUTHERN EAST-WEST CONNECTOR CROSS SECTION

Horseshoe Bend Road to Barwon Heads Road FIGURE PLANM SOUTHERN EAST-WEST CONNECTOR CROSS SECTION

FIGURE PLANN SOUTH WEST CONNECTOR CROSS SECTION

North of Barwon Heads Road and South of southern East-West Connector FIGURE O CHARLEMONT ROAD NORTH AND SOUTH CROSS SECTION

South of Barwon Heads Road to southern East-West Connector FIGURE P CHARLEMONT ROAD CENTRAL CROSS SECTION

FIGURE Q BATTEN ROAD CROSS SECTION

FIGURE R TYPICAL LOCAL ACCESS STREET CROSS SECTION

FIGURE PLANS TYPICAL LOCAL ACCESS STREET BESIDE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CROSS SECTION

SURF COAST HIGHWAY AND BARWON HEADS ROAD 40 METRES ROAD RESERVE FIGURE T TYPICAL LOCAL ACCESS STREET AS SERVICE ROAD TO HIGHWAYS CROSS SECTION

Property Boundary Property Boundary FIGURE U ACCESS LANE CROSS SECTION

Property Boundary Property Boundary FIGURE V ACCESS PLACE CROSS SECTION Date: 1 November 009

4.7 UTILITIES AND ENERGY 4.7.1 Objectives: Utilities and Energy The objectives for the provision of utilities as an essential part of the of ACEP are: a) to ensure all land is serviced appropriately including the supply to all developed lots to the satisfaction of the relevant authority of: a potable water supply; reticulated sewerage; gas; underground electricity (except for infrastructure to support cables with a voltage greater than 66kv, sub-stations and the Alcoa power lines); telecommunications (including fibre to the lot); a recycled water supply; b) to encourage relevant authorities to work toward the undergrounding of existing electricity services. c) to facilitate innovative, sustainable and energy efficient approaches to the provision of such servicing. 4.7. Implementation: Utilities and Energy The objectives for physical services are met by implementation of all of the following. a) Plan 7: Armstrong Creek East Precinct Urban Structure. b) Plan 1: Main Sewerage Supply Network. c) Plan : Main Water Supply Network. d) Plan 3: Main Recycled Water / Third Pipe Supply Network. e) Plan 4: Main Electricity Supply Network. f) Plan 5: Main Natural Gas Supply Network. O:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\W08-7019-0060_00010 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0056_10110 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP with tracked changes.doco:\projects\08-7019\004\word\working\w08-7019-0053_161109 Collie Lodged Copy of ACEPSP.doc 16