SOAR Range Validation Test: Autonomous Buoyancy- Driven Gliders, Autonomous Surface Vehicles, and Autonomous Profiling Floats

Similar documents
Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) Species Verification and Satellite Tagging Test: January Post-Test Report

XRAY GLIDER Underwater Video Cruise Plan May 21, 22, 23, 2007 R. G. Sproul

Acoustic Float for Marine Mammal Monitoring

Acoustic Seaglider for Beaked Whale Detection

Marine Mammal Acoustic Tracking from Adapting HARP Technologies

Acoustic Seaglider for Beaked Whale Detection

RR10106 Cruise Plan ITOP Mooring Recovery and PhilSea10 Seaglider Operation (R/V Revelle November 6-26, 2010)

The Wave Glider: A Mobile Buoy Concept for Ocean Science. 009 Liquid Robotics Inc.

Acoustic Seaglider for Beaked Whale Detection

Noise Experiment #2. Marine Physical Laboratory Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA February 22 February 2010

Wave Glider: Liege Colloquium. Colloquium April 27

BACKGROUND TO STUDY CASE

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

Remote Monitoring of Dolphins and Whales in the High Naval Activity Areas in Hawaiian Waters

Biological & Behavioral Response Studies of. Marine Mammals in Southern California, BRS.org. Photos taken under NMFS permit #

"Real-Time Vertical Temperature, and Velocity Profiles from a Wave Glider"

Beaked whale foraging behavior before, during, and after sonar exposure on a Navy test range

ROV Development ROV Function. ROV Crew Navigation IRATECH SUB SYSTEMS 2010

Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) Moorings: New Capabilities for Seagoing Science

The Evolution of an Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel and Software for Hydrographic Survey

NSF's Ocean Observatories Initiative: Building Research Infrastructure for the Pacific Northwest and the Broader Community

WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION

Final Report Alaska Department of Fish and Game State Wildlife Grant T July 1, 2003 June 30, 2006:

Fine-scale Focal DTAG Behavioral Study in the Gulf of Maine

Proof of Concept Demonstration of the Hybrid Remotely Operated Vehicle (HROV) Light Fiber Tether System

MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title:

~ A Behavioral Response Study in 2007 &2008 (BRS 07/08) was conducted in the Bahamas to

Oceanographic Research With The LiquID Station

Passive Autonomous Acoustic Monitoring of Marine Mammals: System Development Using Seaglider. Final Report

The Wave Glider: A Persistent Platform for Ocean Science

Understanding the Dynamics of Shallow-Water Oceanographic Moorings

Fine-scale Focal Dtag Behavioral Study of Diel Trends in Activity Budgets and Sound Production of Endangered Baleen Whales in the Gulf of Maine

Deep SOLO. Nathalie Zilberman, Dean Roemmich, and SIO float lab. 1. Deep SOLO float characteristics. 2. Deep SOLO float Deployment

Update on Canadian Research Vessels Ship Procurement Projects

CMORE HOE DYLAN October 2012 Draft cruise plan

Wave-Phase-Resolved Air-Sea Interaction

Sensors and Platforms for Autonomous Undersea Systems

Fine Scale Baleen Whale Behavior Observed Via Tagging Over Daily Time Scales

Pioneer Array Micro-siting Public Input Process Frequently Asked Questions

Acoustic and Visual Survey of Cetaceans at Palmyra Atoll

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

Final Cruise Report Marine Mammal Observer UNDET Monitoring Hawaii Range Complex, April, 2011

SeaSmart. Jonathan Evans

Tagging and Playback Studies to Toothed Whales

MOOS IvP Helm Based Simulations of Collision Avoidance by an Autonomous Surface Craft Performing Repeat-Transect Oceanographic Surveys

Activity Title: Exploring the Ocean with Robots

voyageplan SS Itinerary Principal Investigator(s) RV Southern Surveyor program

Rope-less Fishing: A vision for how it can work

NOAA/NWFSC Southern California Shelf Rockfish Hook and Line Survey

Cooperative Navigation for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. Navigare 2011, 4 May 2011, Bern

Isis Deployment. TMS and Live Boating. Inmartech08. Dave Turner Operations Co-ordinator.

Polar Research Vessel Operational Requirements and Summary of Technical Studies

ATON System Workshop

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

Fine-Scale Survey of Right and Humpback Whale Prey Abundance and Distribution

1 Module A (uniform topography) survey lines Module B (topographic wake) survey lines Module C (submesoscale soup) survey lines...

Proof of Concept Demonstration of the Hybrid Remotely Operated Vehicle (HROV) Light Fiber Tether System

RAMSTM. 360 Riser and Anchor-Chain Integrity Monitoring for FPSOs

The MEDUSA Deep Sea and FUSION AUVs:

Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project FERC No Appendix C. Derelict Gear Monitoring Plan

Application for Consent to Conduct Marine Scientific Research in Japan. Date: 18 December 2009 Revised 1/7/ General Information

Chapter 9: Sea operations

Characterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements

Sensor Platform Project Marine Trials Bidders Conference. Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy fundyforce.ca

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

How well do CMIP5 climate models reproduce Southern Ocean bottom temperature? Model climatology

Long-Term Autonomous Measurement of Ocean Dissipation with EPS-MAPPER

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN:

NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

Right Whale Diving and Foraging Behavior in the Southwestern Gulf of Maine

Cruise Plan for QPE (R/V Revelle Sept/ 12-16, 2009)

STOPPING THE UNDERWATER DIVER THREAT

Location: Barkley Canyon Date: September 9, 2013 Constraints: none

The Next Generation Easy-to-Deploy (ETD) Tsunami Assessment Buoy

Underwater Robots Jenny Gabel

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

EXPEDITION ADVENTURE PART 2: HIGHER RESOLUTION RANGE SEISMIC IMAGING TO LOCATE A SUNKEN PIRATE SHIP OFF ILE ST MARIE.

SEAHORSES and SUBMARINES Testing transformational capabilities with modern UUVs at NAVOCEANO by Craig A. Peterson and Martha E. M.

Observations of Near-Bottom Currents with Low-Cost SeaHorse Tilt Current Meters

Draft of OKMC Cruise Plan (R/V Revelle June 1-14, 2012 RR1205)

Potential applications of AUVs and Gliders in Offshore Windfarm Site Surveys

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Cruise Report Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Observer UNDET Monitoring Hawaii Range Complex: 3 April 2014

Marine Mammal Mitigation Systems

Original URI Scanfish MKII

Providing Field Support for the Behavior Response Study (BRS-07)

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

RV Southern Surveyor program

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

Hydrographic Surveying Methods, Applications and Uses

Delivery and Deployment of the U.S. Navy s Submarine Rescue System

RESULTS FROM PARACHUTE SEA ANCHOR DRAG TESTS FOR A SPACE CAPSULE, Jan. 10, 2013

NWEI. Fred.Olsen. Columbia Power

Near-Field Sturgeon Monitoring for the New NY Bridge at Tappan Zee. Quarterly Report July 1 September 30, 2014

Cruise Plan Seafloor Geodesy, Southern Juan de Fuca plate Sept 4-22, 2003

Beaked Whale Group Deep Dive Behavior from Passive Acoustic Monitoring

Sentry de-brief summaries 2011/2012

Troubleshooting Basics: Profiling CTDs

Design and Development of an Autonomous Surface Watercraft

Transcription:

Office of Naval Research Passive Autonomous Acoustic Monitoring of Marine Mammals Dr. Michael W e i s e ONR Program Manager Marine Mammals & Biological Oceanography (Code 322) SOAR Range Validation Test: Autonomous Buoyancy- Driven Gliders, Autonomous Surface Vehicles, and Autonomous Profiling Floats 3-9 January, 2011 Neil M. Bogue Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington Gerald D Spain Marine Physical Lab, Scripps Institution of Oceanography David Fratantoni Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution John Hildebrand Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Haru Matsumoto Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies, Oregon State University National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration David Moretti Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, RI

Objective The objective of this exercise is to analyze the performance of near-real-time passive acoustic detection, classification, and localization systems integrated onto a set of autonomous platforms, including buoyancy-driven underwater gliders, autonomous surface platforms, and profiling floats, to monitor marine mammal calling activity. The performance analysis will be based on inter-comparisons of the outputs of the various autonomous platform systems and on comparison with the detections made on the SOAR range hydrophones. The results of this test will be used to evaluate the readiness of the participating technologies for a fleet demonstration test. Background In April 2005, D. Moretti, N. DiMarzio, and others from NUWC Newport demonstrated the ability to detect and localize the vocalizations of Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) on the AUTEC fixed hydrophone range [Moretti, 2006]. Detections were verified by visual observations. This ability has been demonstrated many times since ([DiMarzio, 2008; Ward, 2008]), and has been extended to other odontocetes [Morrissey, 2006], to other marine mammal species, and to other Navy ranges. In 2007, ONR started the Passive Acoustic Autonomous Monitoring (PAAM) of Marine Mammals program to develop near-real-time monitoring systems on autonomous underwater vehicles. The program is focused on passive acoustic systems for autonomous detection, classification, localization, and tracking of marine mammals on Navy exercise areas for periods of nine weeks. This exercise will use the transient waveform detection and localization capabilities of the SOAR range hydrophones developed by Dave Moretti and others as the ground-truth for verification of the near-real-time results from the autonomous ocean platforms. Six types of PAAM systems will be evaluated in this test, including three types of buoyancy-driven underwater gliders, an autonomous surface platform, and two types of freely drifting profiling floats. The list of the types of platforms, and the numbers of each are listed below. 1. Buoyancy-Driven Underwater Gliders: (1) Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography (MPL/SIO) and Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington (APL/UW) flying wing underwater glider, ZRay, equipped with three types of passive acoustic monitoring systems: 1) a 27-element hydrophone array all along the leading edge of the glider wing whose outputs are connected to a real-time detection/localization and recording system, 2) a WHOI 2-channel (LF and MF) DMON detection/classification and recording system, and 3) a

single, very-wide-band hydrophone, detection/classification, and recording system (mini-harp). (2) APL/ UW Seagliders, an underwater glider equipped with a single omnidirectional hydrophone and internal recorder-detector electronics designed for beaked whales. (1) Webb Research Slocum glider operated by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) equipped with a 2-channel (LF and MF) WHOI-developed Digital MONitoring (DMON) detection/classification and recording system. 2. Autonomous Surface Platform: (2) Liquid Robotics Wavegliders equipped with a single 100-kHz wide hydrophone ( HARP ) and odontocete detector-classifier system. 3. Freely-Drifting Profiling Floats: (2) Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies-Oregon State University (CIMRS/OSU) QUEphones, an APEX float equipped with a single omni-directional hydrophone and internal recorder-detector electronics. (2) WHOI profiling floats equipped with a 2-chan (LF and MF) DMON detection/classification system. Details on these systems are given in the Instrumentation section below. List of Acronyms APL/UW- Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington AUTEC Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center CIMRS/OSU) - Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies, Oregon State University DMON Digital Monitor autonomous detection classification system from WHOI HARP High (actually wide) Frequency Acoustic Recording Package MPL/SIO Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography NOAA National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration NASNI Naval Air Station North Island NUWC Naval Undersea Warfare Center PAAM Passive Autonomous Acoustic Monitoring program ROC Range Operations Center at North Island SOAR Southern California Anti-Submarine Warfare Range SCORE Southern California Offshore Range SPAWAR SSC Pacific Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific WHOI Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Schedule, 2010-2011 Range Validation Test Date Activity Notes Fri, 17 DEC APL/UW Seagliders and gear arrive Marine Physical Lab, Pt. Loma for check-out. Load AUV van and LARS on R/V Sproul. WHOI shipment Weeks of 20 DEC & 27 DEC Sat, 1 JAN Sun, 2 JAN Mon, 3 JAN Tue, 4 JAN WHOI and NOAA/OSU instrumentation arrives at MPL Pt. Loma. Load ZRay. Evaluate SoCal weather forecast. Dave F. and Haru M. arrive at MPL Bldg 4 for checkout. Finish loading Sproul, including SCORE range radios and pod. Depart 7-8 pm PST for SCORE. NUWC arrives at ROC. Arrive at 1 st light on SCORE. Establish contact with ROC. Check out & deploy gliders. Check out & deploy floats. Shipping address: Gerald D Spain Marine Physical Lab, Bldg 4 291 Rosecrans St. San Diego, CA 92106. Please provide tracking info so equipment can be rec d and stored in Bldg. 4. Coordinate with team through email. Please provide approx. arrival times. Follow Sproul loading and space allocation plan. Personnel on board 1 hour prior to departure. Deploy gliders first to measure currents. Seaglider launch procedure 1 hour each. QUEphone ½- hour each. Flying wing glider program paying for Sproul time. Wed, 5 JAN Finish equipment deployment. Begin ZRay ops. Thu-Sat, 6-8 JAN Continue ZRay ops. Monitor all platforms. Recover floats that drift off SOAR range. Sat, 8 JAN Start recovery of gliders & floats. Use RHIB, weather permitting. Sun, 9 JAN Finish recovery & RTP. Stay on range until all equipment on board. Mon, 10 JAN Offload Sproul. Tue morning contingency.

Personnel R/V Sproul Gerald D Spain (MPL/SIO) - chief scientist, ZRay ops, John Hildebrand (MPL/SIO) co-chief scientist, Waveglider ops, 2 MPL/SIO people for Waveglider ops, Wayne Husband or Mark Stevenson (SPAWAR SSC Pac), Waveglider ops, Neil Bogue (APL/UW), Seaglider ops, Trina Litchendorf (APL/UW), Seaglider ops, Dave Fratantoni (WHOI), Slocum glider ops, profiling float ops, Pete Brodsky (APL/UW), ZRay ops, Seaglider ops, Dennis Rimington (MPL/SIO), ZRay ops, Dave Price (MPL/SIO), ZRay ops, Resident Technician (SIO), help with all operations. Range Operations Center (ROC) at NAS/NI Dave Moretti (NUWC), 2-9 JAN, 1 data analyst, Elena McCarthy (NUWC), 2-9 JAN. Shore Support at MPL/SIO Haru Matsumoto (NOAA/OSU), at MPL/SIO 2-3 JAN, Richard Zimmerman (MPL/SIO), Scott Jenkins (MPL/SIO), Tyler Helble (MPL/SIO, SPAWAR SSC Pacific), Mariah Lovejoy (MPL/SIO).

Instrumentation The following equipment is planned for deployment on this test. ZRay Flying Wing Underwater Glider (1): The ZRay/Liberdade flying wing glider, a buoyancy-driven, 20-ft wing span, autonomous underwater platform. Figure 1 shows a photograph of this new glider. The flying wing glider project is a joint effort between MPL/SIO and APL/UW. The outer shape of this glider is based on a flying wing design in order to optimize horizontal transport efficiency, i.e., minimize propulsion energy consumption traveling in the horizontal. The outer shroud is made of ABS plastic and is mounted to a titanium inner strength structure. All subsystems (also mounted to the titanium structure) are identical, or nearly so, to those in XRay, our first flying wing glider fully tested at sea during three field seasons. The glider has a maximum design depth of 300 m and weighs nearly 1500 lb in air. Figure 1. Photograph of ZRay, suspended from its three lift points in the laboratory, without its 3-ft antenna mast or wing tips installed. During the Range Validation Test, ZRay will carry a variety of passive acoustic sensor systems along with associated real-time detection, classification, and localization hardware and software to perform real-time monitoring across a wide range of marine mammal species. The CAD/CAM drawing of ZRay in Fig. 2 shows the locations of these passive acoustic sensor systems in the glider. Inside a sonar dome all along the wing s leading edge is a 27-channel hydrophone array with 10 khz per channel bandwidth. A low-power single board computer running a real-time localization, detection, and

classification algorithm string designed for humpback whales has been connected to the output from this hydrophone array. A self-contained mini-harp system, with a single, extremely wide band (10 Hz to 100 khz) hydrophone and associated real-time processing designed for odontocete detection and classification, is being installed in Zray. In addition, a 2-channel (low and mid-frequency) Digital Monitoring (DMON) system with integrated detection/classification software has been acquired from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and has been integrated in a stand-alone mode in the nose of the wing. Figure 2. CAD/CAM drawing of ZRay with the starboard hatch covers removed and with labels illustrating the locations of the glider s real-time passive acoustic monitoring systems. The pre-launch sequence for ZRay requires about an hour. The glider s launch-andrecovery system, installed on the fantail of the R/V Sproul, allows the glider to be deployed and retrieved without the use of a small boat. Over a hundred launch-andrecovery sequences have been performed in sea states up to sea state 5 without incident.

Seagliders (2): S/N 178 and 179, equipped with single omni-directional hydrophones and PAAM electronics (detector-recorder). Seagliders are buoyancy-driven underwater gliders, rated to 1000 m depth, piloted remotely, with data telemetry and command and control via Iridium satellite telephone. Seaglider's in-air weight in deployment configuration is about 115 lbs (52 kg); they are about 7-feet long (2.2 m), with antenna. See Fig. 3. Figure 3. APL/UW Seaglider in handling cradle (people included for scale). The pre-launch check-out and launch sequence usually takes about an hour per Seaglider. They can be prepared in parallel. Seagliders are typically launched either directly from a RHIB or other small boat, or by a sling using a shipboard winch or crane. An example of a sling launch is shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 4. Seaglider sling launch from crane off R/V MELVILLE. Seagliders are recovered either directly into a RHIB or other small boat, or by bridle (or lasso) using a crane or winch from the deck of a larger vessel. A bridle recovery from a TAGS-60 class ship is shown in Fig. 5.

Figure 5. Seaglider recovery using bridle off TAGS-60 class vessel. The Seagliders will be piloted from a command center at APL/UW in Seattle. Only one Seaglider technician, with help from the ship s Resident Technician and others on board, is required for check-out, deployment, and recovery.

Slocum Glider (1): The Slocum glider (re Figs. 6 and 7), manufactured by Webb Research, also is a buoyancy-driven autonomous underwater glider. It is designed to go to a maximum depth of 300 m. During the Range Validation Test, the Slocum glider will be outfitted with a 2-chan DMON digital monitoring system with low- (LF) and midfrequency (MF) recording capability. Figure 6. Three Slocum gliders resting in their transport dollys on the dock. Figure 7. A Slocum glider on the surface. The upward-looking ADCP mounted on the top of the glider will not be used in the Range Validation Test.

Wavegliders (2): The Waveglider, an autonomous surface vehicle (ASV) manufactured by Liquid Robotics. The Waveglider propels itself forward using the differential wave motion of a float at the ocean surface and a glider at depth. The operation of this USV is described in Fig. 8 below. Figure 8. Description of the Waveglider commercialized by Liquid Robotics. As shown in the left-hand plot of Fig. 8, water particles move in approximately circular orbits of decreasing diameter as depth increases. The float pulls the glider upward with a rising wave crest, but the water around the glider remains relatively stationary. This action provides the necessary energy for forward propulsion of the glider/float assembly. The basic Waveglider components are labeled and described in the right-hand plot in Fig. 8. Massive components are positioned in the submerged glider where they are protected from the winds and sea surface action. The surface float is light, low drag, and rugged. The tether connecting the glider and surface float typically is 5-15 m in length. During the Range Validation Test, each of two Wavegliders will be equipped with a single hydrophone towed behind the glider along with a data acquisition system. One ASV also will contain a mini-harp real-time odontocete detection/classification unit. The communication systems attached to its surface float allow it to be operated continuously under human control.

QUEphones (2): QUEphones are specially modified APEX profiling floats, equipped with single omni-directional hydrophone and internal recorder-detector electronics. They are designed to be neutrally-buoyant at a specified depth (density surface), park there for a specified time, then profile during the ascent to the surface for data telemetry. A QUEphone is shown in Fig. 9. Figure 9. QUEphone (on acoustic test barge) lifted by a bridle attached to the collar. QUEphones are typically deployed by sling or slip-line from the deck of a ship. The inair weight is about 125 lbs (56kg) and they are about 5 feet (1.5m) tall. They are recovered via RHIB or other small boat, or if it is extremely calm, by use of a recovery bridle or lasso from the deck of a shallow draft vessel. Figure 10 shows a QUEphone in the water.

Figure 10. QUEphone diving in water (L) and at surface (R). The pictures show the antenna, omnidirectional hydrophone (on top), and lifting bridle.

WHOI Profiling Floats (2): The WHOI profiling floats, shown in Fig. 11 below. The operation of the profiling floats from WHOI is similar to that of the QUEphone floats. These two WHOI floats will profile to 800 m and remain at that depth for about 6 hours, and then profile back to the surface. This pattern will be repeated, with a surfacing once every 12 hours, throughout the duration of the sea test. The floats will be equipped with the same 2-chan DMON system as used on the Slocum glider. Figure 11. The WHOI profiling float. Note that the float will not have VCM vanes attached for the Range Validation Test on the SOAR range.

Operations Plan The SOAR operation areas of greatest marine mammal abundance are T2 and T4, at the western and southern parts of the range, respectively. Highlighted in yellow on the map in Fig. 12 is the approximate area coverage of this instrumented part of the range. The R/V Sproul will position itself near the southern edge of the SOAR range by first light on the first morning of the first day. A detailed map showing the recommended glider tracks with respect to the range hydrophone locations is distributed under separate cover. Figure 12. The outline of the locations of the SOAR range hydrophones (in yellow) west of San Clemente Island. Start of the Exercise: Shortly after first light on first day on the range, the two Seagliders and the Slocum glider will be checked out and deployed. Deployment of the Wavegliders will follow. By deploying the gliders first, they can be used to assess the prevailing ocean currents prior to deployment of the freely drifting profiling floats. The hull-mounted ADCP on the Sproul also will be useful for this purpose. The gliders and Wavegliders will begin their surveys following a track along the western edge of the SOAR range, heading to the northwest (details on the recommended tracks is distributed under separate cover). Just to the southeast of the western extent of the SOAR range, the gliders will turn to the northeast and then to the southeast on the return leg. These recommended survey patterns will continue to be traversed as marine mammal detection results are available from the NUWC personnel at the SOAR Range Operations Center (ROC).

Starting on the morning of Mon, 3 Jan, the SOAR range operations center (ROC) at NASNI will be manned by personnel from NUWC Division Newport. They will monitor the SOAR range hydrophones for the presence of marine mammal calling activity and will communicate this information by satellite phone and range radio to the R/V Sproul. These results then can be used to possibly modify the glider survey patterns, as well as guide the deployment locations of the profiling floats. Once these platforms are deployed, their operations will be monitored remotely. Any freely drifting floats that drift off the instrumented (SOAR) part of the SCORE range will be recovered and secured for the remainder of the sea trip. The recording duration for the two QUEphones is about 4 days and 6-7 days for the WHOI profiling floats. ZRay Flying Wing Underwater Glider: The ZRay flying wing glider deployments will commence on the morning of the second day on the range (Wed, 5 Jan). The glider will go in the water shortly after breakfast, remain in the water all day, and be recovered on board shortly before sunset each day Wed thru Fri, 5-7 Jan, and possibly Sat, 8 Jan. After each surfacing, the data collected onboard the glider will be zipped and uploaded to the Sproul through RF modem and immediately emailed to Richard Zimmerman, Scott Jenkins, and Mariah Lovejoy providing shore support. Once the glider descends on its next dive, in-depth analyses will be conducted by ZRay personnel both on the Sproul and on shore to adjust the flight parameters on the subsequent dive. While at depth, ZRay will become neutrally buoyant, freely drifting for periods of 15-60 min in order to passively listen for marine mammal calls. By using this approach, the engineering testing goals as well as those for demonstrating a real-time marine mammal monitoring capability with ZRay can be achieved. Seagliders: Once trim dives are complete, the Seagliders will be commanded to perform 1000 m dives, with the autonomous detection system turned on below a given depth, typically between 100 m and 500 m. These 1000-m dives will generally take around five hours, although they can be sped up to about three hours, or slowed down to almost nine hours, if needed. At each surfacing, the Seagliders will upload their data, including standard CTD profiles, acoustic detection statistics, and optionally, acoustic time-series snippets and spectra. The Seagliders also download revisions to commands, waypoints, or sampling and detection parameters sent by the glider command center. Seagliders carry an acoustic transponder for ranging in case of an emergency recovery. The transponder operates in the 9-14 khz band. Seagliders can generally travel about 12 nm (20 km) through the water in 24 hours, but can also hold station to within a radius of about 1.5 times the dive depth, or 1.5 km on

1000-m dives. Seaglider can stem depth-averaged currents of up to 40 cm/sec (0.8 kts). Such currents are unlikely on the range (re Environmental Conditions below), assuming 1000-m dives, so the gliders should not have problems maintaining track and station control. Upon recovery, the Seagliders are commanded to stay at the surface and report their position at regular intervals. QUEphone Profiling Floats: Since the QUEphones are passive, they drift with the prevailing ocean current at their neutrally-buoyant depth. The ocean currents will be determined prior to deployment, as described at the beginning of this section. This determination will be critical to picking the launch position in order to keep the QUEphones within the assigned water-space. Previous measurements on the SCORE range (re Environmental Conditions) suggest that the general direction of the current will be to the north and northwest. Therefore, the initial plan is to deploy the two QUEphones at the southern end of the SOAR range area. The instrument s neutrally-buoyant depth will be set to about 1000 m. They will stay at this depth for about 16 hours/day and drift with the current. Each QUEphone will be programmed to surface once a day at a specific time, one at about 0900 and the other at about 1500 (local time). Each will report the status to the NOAA-Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Iridium Rudics web site. Access to that web site should be available from the Sproul. Their progress will be monitored 24/7 through this web site. The ocean currents will be monitored throughout the exercise, and the QUEphones, and PAAM instrumentation in general, will be repositioned or recovered if necessary. Note that if the current at the neutrally-buoyant depth is 10 cm/sec, a QUEphone drifts 35 km in 4 days. SOAR Range Operations Center at NASNI: NUWC personnel in the ROC will continue to operate the M3R system and report marine mammal calling activity until the Sproul begins platform recovery on Sat afternoon, 8 Jan. M3R data recording in the ROC will continue until the Sproul returns to port at the end of the day on Sun, 9 Jan. Certain periods of time may be selected for recording of the raw range hydrophone outputs. The SOAR range operations center does NOT control the water space on the north, south, west, or east of the SOAR range. Rather, all water space outside SOAR below a depth of 90 ft (30 m) is managed by SUBPAC (SUBPAC does not manage the water space within 90 ft of the surface). Therefore, either: a) gliders and profilers at depths in excess of 90 ft must be retrieved if they move off range, b) permission must be obtained from SUBPAC beforehand, or c) gliders and profilers that move off the SOAR range must be programmed to stay within 90 ft of the surface. In cases b) or c), longer ship transits to recovery would be required at the end of the test.

Environmental Conditions at SOAR During the ASWEET exercise the last week of September and first week of October, 2010, the APL/UW team determined from Seaglider flights that the ocean currents near the surface were typically about 20 cm/s (0.7-0.8 kt) to the NNW. Typical depthaveraged current estimates were as follows: 0-200 m 12 cm/s 348 deg T 0-1000 m 4 cm/s 335 deg T Figure 13 shows the temperature-salinity (T-S) profile from a 1000 m dive of one of the Seagliders on the SCORE range on 5 OCT, 2010, at 32/44.07N, 118/55.73W. Figure 13. Temperature and Salinity profiles to 1000 m collected by one of the APL/UW Seagliders on the SCORE range (32/44.07N, 118/55.73W) during the ASWEET exercise on 5 Oct, 2010.

For comparison, Fig. 14 shows a T-S profile from a 200 m dive by the same Seaglider in a Southern California deployment, on 17 NOV, 2007, at 32/45.97N, 117/46.83W. Although this location is east of San Clemente Island, it is closer in time to the time period of the Range Validation Test. Figure 14. A T-S profile to 200 m collected by the same Seaglider as in Fig. 13. These data were collected on 17 Nov, 2007, to the east of San Clemente Island, at 32/45.97N, 117/46.83W. Communications during the Test Ship-to-SOAR Operations: The SOAR range operations people would prefer to communicate, in descending order of priority, via: 1. Satellite phone (ROC main line: 619-313-2200) 2. Nextel cell phones (Nextel cell phone tower on San Clemente Island) 3. channel 82A VHF marine band radio The R/V Sproul also will be equipped with range radios.

The main phone number for the SOAR range at the Range Operations Center at Naval Air Station, North Island is 619-313-2200. The SOAR range has no requirement for range transponders or range radios. However, Dave Moretti has arranged for the R/V Sproul to be equipped with range radios and a range tracking pod installation on Mon, 3 Jan. Navigation Requirements for Off-Board Platforms during the Test The SOAR range operations center does NOT control the water space on the north, south, west, or east of the SOAR range. Rather, all water space outside SOAR below a depth of 90 ft (30 m) is managed by SUBPAC (SUBPAC does not manage the water space within 90 ft of the surface). Therefore, either: a) gliders and profilers at depths in excess of 90 ft must be retrieved if they move off range, b) permission must be obtained from SUBPAC beforehand, or c) gliders and profilers that move off the SOAR range must be programmed to stay within 90 ft of the surface. The SOAR range does NOT require tracking pingers on the platforms for sub-surface tracking on the range. Technical and Logistic Support Requests 1. Request from SUBPAC for instrumentation off the SOAR range to be below 90 ft during the 4-10 Jan period. 2. Submit Notice to Mariners and notification to other local Navy activities. 3. Phone numbers for NUWC personnel in the ROC and the satellite phone on R/V Sproul. 4. Vessel capable of emergency recovery or repositioning, if needed (e.g., Vessel Assist). 5. SOAR range fixed hydrophone transient detection and localization data, including start and stop times of detections on each hydrophone for period of 3-9 Jan. 6. Visits to the SOAR ROC during the 3-7 Jan period require a visit request to be on file. Email the request to Ms. Roxanne Jones (rjones@score.com) with copy to Robert Tahimic (bobt@score.com). The required information is: a. Visitor's full name (Last, First, Middle Initial), b. Company or Organization Name - complete address, phone number, fax number & CAGE code, c. Visitor's Social Security Number - this information is protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, d. Visitor's Date of Birth and Place of Birth (city/state),

e. Citizenship, f. Individual's Level of Clearance Access - this information is verified using JPAS, g. Specific Date(s) of Visit (include the year), h. Technical Point of Contact (POC) - Robert Tahimic 619-545-8527, i. Specific Purpose of Visit (include classification of visit) - M3R monitoring of beaked whales during glider test: UNCLASS, j. Contract number - for non-governmental activities, k. Name, Title, and Signature of authorizing company official (may NOT be one of the listed visitors). Information on Ships R/V Sproul - http://shipsked.ucsd.edu/ships/robert_gordon_sproul/ To be used during deployment leg, and preferably during recovery leg. Vessel Assist San Diego - http://vesselassistsandiego.com/ 1-800-391-4869, (619) 235-8273 P.O. Box 6778 San Diego, CA 92166 Merlin ($6K/day plus fuel) Neil had positive experience using it for SCORE range recovery after ASWEET. The Truth - http://www.truthaquatics.com/the-truth.html 65-ft dive boat with good davit, out of Santa Barbara. Pacific Venture - http://www.pacific-venture.com/ Capt. Chuck White, charter service out of Oceanside Harbor, around $2.5K/day - 5-hr trip from Oceanside to SCORE, Recommended by Todd Pickering at SPAWAR SSD. SPAWAR SSD San Diego's Steve Whiteside's 11-m RHIBs $3-4K per day with techs, day-time use only in/out of Wilson's Cove - SPAWAR Dive locker. USNS ships Sioux - in middle of maintenance period, ending 03 Dec, 2010, Salvor - already committed and won't be in San Diego until around 30 Nov.

Questions and List of Tasks 1. Who will develop a loading plan and space allocation for R/V Sproul? 2. What is required to get SUBPAC permission for equipment to be off the SOAR range and below 90 ft? 3. Contingency plan for equipment recovery at end of test in case the weather is rough. 4. How will information from the M3R at the ROC get distributed to all shipboard participants and to glider command centers (satellite phone call from ROC to one shipboard participant may not be sufficient)? References [DiMarzio, 2008] DiMarzio, N., Moretti, D., Ward, J., Morrissey, R., Jarvis, S., Izzi, A. M., Johnson, M., Tyack, P., Hansen, A., Passive acoustic measurement of dive vocal behavior and group size of Blainville's beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris) in the Tongue of the Ocean (TOTO), Canadian Acoustics, 36(1), pp166-171, 2008. [Moretti, 2006] Moretti, D., DiMarzio, N., Morrissey, R., and Jarvis, S., Estimating the density of Blainville's beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris) in the Tongue of the Ocean (TOTO) using passive acoustics, Proc. MTS/IEEE OCEANS Boston, 2006. [Morrissey, 2006] Morrissey, R. P., Ward, J., DiMarzio, N., Jarvis, S., Moretti, D.J., Passive acoustic detection and localization of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in the Tongue of the Ocean, Applied Acoustics, 67, pp1091-1105, 2006. [SCORE, 2007] Southern California Offshore Range (SCORE) Development History (1981-2007), 26 pgs. [Ward, 2008] Ward, J., Morrissey, R., Moretti, D., DiMarzio, N., Jarvis, S., Johnson, M., Tyack, P., and White, C., Passive acoustic detection and localization of Mesoplodon densirostris (Blainville s beaked whale) vocalizations using distributed bottom-mounted hydrophones in conjunction with a Digital Tag (DTag) recording, Canadian Acoustics, 36(1), pp60-66, 2008. Contact Information Neil M. Bogue <bogue@u.washington.edu> 206-221-7687 (wk), 206-409-7061 (cell) Gerald D Spain gdspain@ucsd.edu 858-534-5517 (wk), 858-534-5255 (fax) Marine Physical Laboratory 291 Rosecrans St. San Diego, CA 92106

David Fratantoni <dfratantoni@whoi.edu> 508-289-2908 (wk), 508-826-8662 (cell), 508-457-2181 (fax) Autonomous Systems Laboratory Department of Physical Oceanography, MS#30 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA dfratantoni@whoi.edu http://asl.whoi.edu John Hildebrand jhildebrand@ucsd.edu 858-535-4069 (wk) Marine Physical Laboratory Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA 93940 Haru Matsumoto Haru.Matsumoto@noaa.gov, haru.matsumoto@oregonstate.edu 541-867-0272 (wk), 541-867-3907 (fax) CIMRS/NOAA, Oregon State Univ. 2115 SE OSU Dr. Newport, OR "Moretti, David J CIV NUWC NWPT" <david.moretti@navy.mil>, morettidj@hotmail.com 401-832-5749 Weise, Michael michael.j.weise@navy.mil 703-696-4533 (wk) Dr. Michael J. Weise Marine Mammals & Biological Oceanography Program (322 MMB) Office of Naval Research - Code 32 One Liberty Center - Rm 1068 875 N. Randolph St. Arlington, VA 22203-1995 703.696.4533 office 703.696.2007 fax michael.j.weise@navy.mil http://www.onr.navy.mil/en/science-technology/departments/code-32/all- Programs/Atmosphere-Research-322/Marine-Mammals-Biology.aspx SCORE Range Range Operations Center main number: 619-313-2200 Robert Tahimic, bobt@score.com, 619-545-8527 Heidi Nevitt, heidi@score.com, 619-545-6539 Dorothy ( DJ ) Pascua

APPENDIX 1 - QUEPhone Deployment Manual Deployment At the site 10 minutes before deployment Open serial communication program (9600, N, 8, 1) and connect SAIL com. (SAIL needs ext power!). Connect the 6-pin Impulse connector. Hit return (this wakes up the QUEphone). Make sure there is no file. Type e to execute. Put the dummy plug back. Move the QUEphone to a place with clear sky view (for Iridium com) Ready to deploy You have about 30 minutes to deploy. It transmits brief data file twice approximately at 15-min interval, then dive begins. To deploy from the ship, use a polypro line loop to lower it in water. Recovery To pick it up, grab by the polypro loop (not by antenna or hydrophone). Preferably to be picked up by RHIB if weather permits. If it is from a low draft boat, a10-ft pole with a hook (with rope on one end) would do. We will ship the telescoping pole with a hook line. Move the QUEphone where clear view of sky. Open Motocross com software. Connect the serial cable. Hit return (sometimes it does not respond because it is busy with TX/RX with Iridium. Let it finish.). Type k to kill. Make sure DSP is not ON. i*k to kill the power of DSP. Move the piston to 110 for shipping (ig 110). Moving the piston to 110 takes time (about 15 min). When the motor stops, type q to quite. This make the float low-power hibernate mode. Clean with fresh water. Remove the rubber plug on the bottom. Wash well inside cowling. Wash inside the pressure sensor. Dry it for shipping.