On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Similar documents
Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

Toole Design Group is live tweeting this webinar

FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

On-Street Bicycle Facilities

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

Designing On Road Bikeways

Off-road Trails. Guidance

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc. june 2011

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

Who is Toole Design Group?

Memorandum. Exhibit 60 SSDP To: Jenny Bailey, Senior Planner. From: Bill Schultheiss, P.E. (WA. P.E. #46108) Date: June 20, 2017

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

PBIC Webinar. How to Create a Bicycle Safety Action Plan: Planning for Safety [IMAGE] Oct. 2, 2014, 2 pm

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

Complete Streets Design Considerations. Second Street Corridor Complete Streets Workshop and Assessment Manchester, NH April 26, 2013

Appendix C. City of Fort Collins Recommended Bicycle Design Guidelines. Appendix C: Recommended Bicycle Design Guidelines 1

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

DRAFT Montgomery County Bicycle Master Plan Design Toolkit

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

OBJECTIVE: Improve safety by designing all bicycle facilities to the latest AASHTO bicycle guidelines and 2009 MUTCD Standards.

DESIGN GUIDANCE 1. INTRODUCTION 2. PRIORITIZED STATEWIDE BICYCLE NETWORK

Bike Planning: A New Day

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Technical Memorandum. Shoulder Width Standards for State Highways. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction. Purpose

Shared Lane Markings: When and Where to Use Them. Mike Sallaberry, SFMTA Pro Walk/Pro Bike in Seattle September 4, 2008

This Technical Memorandum extends the expiration date of Technical Memorandum TS-07 to August 1, 2021 unless superseded prior to that date.

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

2012 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

Coquitlam Cross-town Bike Route Improving Bicycle Facilities in a Mature Suburban Environment

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Chapter 4 Engineering 4.12 Sample Cross-Sections

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

General Design Factors

4.1 CONTEXT. The existing terrain and sight conditions will affect available sight lines and approach speeds of bicyclists and motorists.

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

DRAFT. Scholls Ferry Road Conceptual Design Plan Technical Memorandum Multi-Modal Examples. Multnomah County 1600 SE 190th Avenue Portland, OR 97233

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

3 Bikeway Types & Design Guidance

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

March 2008 FINAL DRAFT. Supplemental Bikeway Design Guidelines

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

Photo: Salt Lake City. Bikeway Design. Photo: Salt Lake City

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Living Streets Policy

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

A Insert design-related public comment here.

PURPOSE AND POLICY GUIDANCE

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

Bicycle Facilities Planning

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

APPENDIX A(1) VDOT Complete Streets: Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Guidelines, Bus Stop Design and Parking Guidelines

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Cyclists and Bikeways: What s your match? A guide to bikeway options for a variety of cyclists

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

Pedestrian Safety at Interchanges

Color your stress away

Figure 5-1 Complete Street Zones. Roadside. May include frontage, pedestrian throughway, furnishings and curbside areas.

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Walking Along the Road. Module 2

Appendices. A. Bicycle Facilities Design Guidelines. Kern County Bicycle Master Plan and Complete Streets Recommendations 175

Transcription:

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design Presentation by: Nick Jackson Bill Schultheiss, P.E. September 04, 2012

FOLLOW THE CONVERSATION ON TWITTER Toole Design Group is live tweeting this webinar @tooledesign #AASHTO #BikeGuide

WEBINAR #3: ON ROAD FACILITIES PART 1: BIKE LANES AND INTERSECTIONS Today s Webinar Significant Updates & New Content for bicycle lane design Purpose & Benefits Marking and Sign Basics Intersections/Turns Retrofitting

FUTURE WEBINARS August 10: Overview August 22: Planning Chapter September 4: On-Road Bikeways Part I Bike Lanes (including Intersections) September 18: On-Road Bikeways Part II Shared lanes Bicycle boulevards & signing Signals October 9: Shared Use Paths General design principles Pathway geometry October 23: Shared Use Paths Intersection Design Mid-block crossings November 6: Bikeway Maintenance and Operation

DISCOUNT FOR WEBINAR PARTICIPANTS http://www.walkinginfo.org/training/pbic/ AASHTO_Promo_Flyer.pdf Link will be emailed to webinar attendees

SOME BACKGROUND What is AASHTO? Mission: provides technical services to support states in their efforts to efficiently and safely move people and goods Some history Last Guide 1999, largely written in 96-98 Survey to update Guide - 2004 Standards vs. guidance (Shall vs. should or may) Relationship between AASHTO Guide and the MUTCD Innovation vs. accepted practice

RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER MANUALS 2009 MUTCD FHWA 2011 AASHTO Green Book Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) 2010 Highway Capacity Manual

AASHTO VS. NACTO GUIDE: EITHER/OR? AASHTO covers paths + onroad bikeways AASHTO covers design comprehensively AASHTO covers many but not all innovations NACTO is a source of information for solutions that are currently experimental

DESIGN GUIDANCE OF GREEN BOOK Streets designed to meet design principals of the Green Book will typically accommodate bikes by providing adequate: sight distance Vertical & horizontal curves Cross slopes

DESIGN GUIDANCE OF MUTCD Follows MUTCD (Chapter 3) nomenclature & definitions Solid lines discourage crossing 4 to 6 inch lines are normal widths wide lines are 2x normal widths to add emphasis Double solid lines prohibit crossing Dotted lines provide guidance or warning (dashed, broken)

GREEN COLORED BICYCLE LANES Guide incorporates Green Lane FHWA interim approval http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/interim_approval/ia14/ia14grnpmbiketlanes.pdf

GREEN COLORED BICYCLE LANES Guide incorporates Green Lane FHWA interim approval http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/interim_approval/ia14/ia14grnpmbiketlanes.pdf in marked bicycle lanes extensions of bicycle lanes through intersections and other traffic conflict areas. {Enter Module Name on Master Slide}

COLORED PAVEMENT {Enter Module Name on Master Slide}

CHAPTER 4 MAJOR CONTENT CHANGES New Bike Lane Content Value of bike lanes Bike lane width nuances Climbing lanes On street parking strategies Expanded intersection guidance Roadway retrofit strategies

BICYCLE LANE VS WIDE OUTSIDE LANE 1999 Guide Wide curb lanes for bicycle use are usually preferred where shoulders are not provided, such as in restrictive urban areas.

BICYCLE LANE VS WIDE OUTSIDE LANE 2012 Guide The provision of wide outside lanes should also be weighed against the likelihood that motorists will travel faster in them, resulting in decreased level of service for bicyclists and pedestrians. Bike lanes are the appropriate and preferred bicycle facility for thoroughfares in both urban and suburban areas.

CHAPTER 4 MAJOR CONTENT CHANGES Innovative Designs Green bike lanes Buffered bike lanes Contra-flow bike lanes Climbing Lanes Accommodating left turns Back-in angle parking

BICYCLIST BASICS Same access & mobility needs as motorists Crashes in urban areas highest at intersections Operating speed and acceleration rates vary Sensitive to traffic speeds, volumes, trucks, terrain, and lateral separation Vulnerable roadway user

BICYCLIST AND BICYCLE LANE BASICS Allow cyclists to choose operating speed Preferred over shared lanes/wide outside lanes Bicyclists prefer bicycle lane continuity Still sensitive to adjacent traffic volumes and speeds

ENGINEERING JUDGMENT The treatments described reflect typical situations; local conditions may vary and engineering judgment should be applied.

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS widths should be determined by context and anticipated use. Measure to center of line Bicyclists preferred operating width is at least 5 feet

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS NO GUTTER, CURB, OR PARKING 4 foot minimum

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS NO GUTTER WITH CURB (NO PARKING) 5 foot typical 4 foot allowed Constrained, low speed roads All other lanes narrowed first Additional width improves comfort and safety

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS WITH GUTTER AND CURB 5 foot minimum with 12-inch gutter 6 foot minimum with 24-inch gutter Additional width improves comfort and safety

DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS WITH CURBSIDE BIKE LANES Useable width of 4 feet is recommended Drainage grates Reduce effective width of bike lane Use bicycle compatible grates Widen bike lane or relocate grate if the clear bike lane operating space falls below 4 feet 4 Feet

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS ADJACENT TO PARALLEL PARKING Bike lane width: 5 foot minimum 6 or 7 foot width adjacent to high turnover parking Wider lanes where parking in high demand may encourage double parking Parking lane width: 8 foot desirable 7 foot minimum

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS ADJACENT TO PARALLEL PARKING Combined bike and parking lane width should be a minimum of13 feet where parking line is not utilized 13 Feet

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS ADJACENT TO PARALLEL PARKING Combined bike and parking lane width may be a minimum of12 feet where parking line is marked 12 Feet

DOORING CONCERNS

DESIGNS TO REDUCE DOORING Wider Bike Lanes Wider Parking Lanes

DESIGNS TO REDUCE DOORING Buffered door zone Parking Tees

DESIGNS TO REDUCE DOORING

BIKE LANES AND ANGLED PARKING Bike lanes should normally not be placed adjacent to conventional front-in diagonal parking...

BIKE LANES AND ANGLED PARKING

BIKE LANES AND ANGLED PARKING The use of back-in diagonal parking can mitigate the conflicts normally associated with front-in parking.

BICYCLE LANE WIDTHS SIDE BY SIDE RIDING Minimum widths of 6-8 feet: Allow cyclists to ride side by side Increase comfort on higher speed/volume roads May be inclusive of buffer if present

BICYCLE LANE MARKINGS AND SIGNS Bike lane line and bike symbol required Parking line optional Bike lane signs optional Optional Required

BICYCLE LANE MARKINGS AND SIGNS

BICYCLE LANE MARKINGS AND SIGNS

BICYCLE LANE MARKINGS AND SIGNS Both symbols still allowed or the words BIKE LANE Symbols spaced between 100 feet and 1,000 feet Place close to locations motorists will cross bike lanes {Enter Module Name on Master Slide}

BICYCLE LANES ON TWO-WAY STREETS In most cases, install bicycle lane on both sides of street In some circumstances, it may be desirable to install a bike lane on one side of a narrow street with shared lane markings opposite side (of bike lane) {Enter Module Name on Master Slide}

CLIMBING LANES ON TWO WAY STREETS Install bike lane in uphill direction Install shared lane markings in downhill direction

BICYCLE LANES ON ONE-WAY STREETS Generally, right side bike lanes preferred Left side bike lanes can be beneficial on one-way streets: high volume of left-turning bicyclists To decrease conflicts with Truck loading Buses and transit stops heavy right turn volumes dooring

CONTRA-FLOW BIKE LANES Placed on the right side of road Provide a bicycle facility in the with traffic direction Bike lane Shared lane marking Double yellow lines or physical separation

CONTRA-FLOW BIKE LANES Requires Except Bicycles supplemental plaque Signals oriented to bicyclists may be needed at signalized intersections

BUFFERED BIKE LANES Striped buffers may be used to provide increased separation to parking or travel lanes

BICYCLE LANES AT INTERSECTIONS Principles for good design: Minimize free-flowing movements Provide guidance to bicyclists and motorists Direct, logical routing Signal accommodations provided May use dotted or solid lines on approaches Consider state or local laws

BIKE LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTIONS 4 foot minimum 5 feet or wider preferred

SOLID LANE LINES VS DOTTED Solid lane lines discourage crossing or merging Dashed lane lines encourage crossing or merging Consider state and local laws for motorists turning at intersections

DOTTED BIKE LANE LINES

SOLID LANE LINES

RIGHT TURN CONSIDERATIONS Bike lane may be dotted, solid, or dropped Solid or dotted? Volume of right turning vehicles Bus stops Motor vehicle speed State or local law Incorporate R4-4 sign at start of right turn lane

LEFT TURN CONSIDERATIONS

DOTTED LINES THROUGH INTERSECTIONS

DOTTED LINES AND COLORED PAVEMENT

DOTTED LINES AND COLORED PAVEMENT Green can be dashed to match dotted lines Green can utilized to silhouette standard MUTCD word and symbol markings

BIKE LANES AT BUS STOPS

RETROFITTING ON EXISTING STREETS AND HIGHWAYS New section Reallocation of Roadway Space Narrowing lane widths (lane diets) Removing travel lanes or parking lanes (road diets) Reconfiguration or removal of parking Construction improvements Relocate drainage inlets Reconstruct or remove gutters Surface repairs

ROAD DIETS Reducing Travel Lane Width Reducing the Number of Travel Lanes (4-3) 15,000 vpd = Good Candidate 15-20,000 vpd = Requires Engineering Study 20,000+ vpd = Still Possible

ROAD DIETS 4 LANES TO 3

ROAD DIETS UNBALANCED LANES One lane approaching middle of bridge Two lanes approaching the intersections

ROAD DIETS TRAVEL LANE REMOVAL

ROAD DIETS TRAVEL LANE REMOVAL

ROAD DIETS TRAVEL LANE REPURPOSING

ROAD DIETS PARKING LANE REMOVAL

ROAD DIETS Benefits include: Provision of bicycle lanes Traffic calming/speed reduction Crash reductions Pedestrian safety Provision of space for turn lanes Reduced traffic noise Increased comfort to pedestrians and bicyclists

LANE DIETS Narrow arterial lanes up to 10 feet acceptable citing research narrow lanes don t increase crash rates.

LANE DIETS

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS Gutter Seam Raveling Gutter Removal

EXAMPLE APPLYING PRINCIPALS OF GUIDE TO BIKE LANE ENDS SITUATIONS

EXAMPLE APPLYING PRINCIPLES OF GUIDE TO BIKE LANE ENDS SITUATIONS Share the Road Lane width >14 feet Bikes May Use Full Lane Lane width <14 feet {Enter Module Name on Master Slide}

THANK YOU! Contact information: Questions? Jennifer Toole Toole Design Group jtoole@tooledesign.com Bill Schultheiss, P.E. Toole Design Group wschultheiss@tooledesign.com Nick Jackson Toole Design Group njackson@tooledesign.com

FUTURE WEBINARS August 10: Overview August 22: Planning Chapter September 4: On-Road Bikeways Part I Bike Lanes (including Intersections) September 18: On-Road Bikeways Part II Shared lanes Bicycle boulevards & signing Signals October 9: Shared Use Paths General design principles Pathway geometry October 23: Shared Use Paths Intersection Design Mid-block crossings November 6: Bikeway Maintenance and Operation

WEBINAR 4: OTHER ON-ROAD BIKEWAYS Design of other on-road bicycle facilities (shared lanes, paved shoulders, bike boulevards) Traffic signal design for bicycles Fundamentals of bicycle guide signs (wayfinding) Webinar Date: September 18th Presenters: William Schultheiss, PE & Christina Fink, PE https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/432436666