SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN. Superpave Mix Design 1

Similar documents
CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN GUIDELINES ASPHALT CONCRETE

Kraton Ultra-thin HMA / WMA Overlay Study

OHD L-47. Guidelines for Resolving Differences in Test Results

Chapter 37 Tex-241-F, Superpave Gyratory Compacting of Test Specimens of Bituminous Mixtures

AGGREGATE INFORMATION

RESISTANCE OF COMPACTED ASPHALT MIXTURE TO MOISTURE INDUCED DAMAGE (Kansas Test Method KT-56)

Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) Evaluation

EVALUATION OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER FOR HMA MIX DESIGN

FINAL REPORT FOR NCHRP (375) Improvements to Dry-Back Procedure of AASHTO T 209. December 2017

Missouri University of Science & Technology. MoDOT TENSILE STRENGTH RATIO (TSR) TRAINING/CERTIFICATION COURSE

Using RAP in Asphalt Mixtures

9 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES

HCMTCB ASPHALT CERTIFICATION KEY ELEMENTS LIST

ASPHALT PLANT LEVEL 1

ADDENDUM REPORT. Project: Bid Package: 2 Current Let: 06/24/ :00 AM Version: Addendum Addendum : 1

SUPERPAVE Construction Lessons Learned. NEAUPG Annual Meeting Wilkes-Barre, PA October 23, 2003

ASPHALT MIX DESIGN AND ANALYSIS TOWARDS IMPROVING COMPACTIBILITY OF WEARING COURSE MIXES IN THE WESTERN CAPE

IMPROVING MIX DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PERMEABLE FRICTION COURSE MIXTURES

Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer to Assess Rutting Susceptibility of HMA Designed for High Tire Pressure Aircraft

Estimating Low Temperature PG-Grade of Binders in RAP without Extraction

IN-PLACE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8

Compaction Theory and Best Practices

Managing Density For Asphalt Pavement

Aug 17, 2001 LAB MANUAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY (RICE VOIDS TEST) OF PAVING MIXTURES AASHTO Designation T 209 (Mn/DOT Modified))

Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Used to Assess Rutting Susceptibility of Hot-Mix Asphalt Designed for High Tire Pressure Aircraft

Method of Test for Sieve Analysis

BALANCED MIX DESIGN APPROACH. Robert Lee, P.E. Flexible Pavements Director

Update on Performance of Thin Asphalt Overlays

Development of a Fundamental Skid Resistance Asphalt Mix Design Procedure

2014 PennDOT Gmm Verification Program

SUPPORTING NOTES FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNBOUND ROAD BASE AND SUB-BASE AGGREGATES

INTERNATIONAL SLURRY SURFACING ASSOCIATION TECHNICAL BULLETIN. 800 Roosevelt Road, Building C-312, Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Tex-206-F, Compacting Specimens Using the Texas Gyratory Compactor (TGC)

Asphalt Mixture Quality Acceptance

This study was initiated to address these performance issues. It focused on the following three topics:

COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TEXAS GYRATORY COMPACTOR (TGC) PART I COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TGC. Test Procedure for

Project Update: Characterization of Alaskan Hot-Mix Asphalt containing RAP

BEST PRACTICE FOR COMPACTING WARM AND HOT MIX ASPHALT NEAUPG OCTOBER 7,2009

BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND UNIT WEIGHT OF COMPACTED HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) (Kansas Test Method KT-15)

ASPHALT PLANT LEVEL 1

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Quality Assurance

Asphalt Mixture Quality Assurance

DETERMINING OPTIMUM RESIDUAL ASPHALT CONTENT (RAC) FOR POLYMER-MODIFIED SLURRY SEAL (MICROSURFACING) MIXTURES

Method of Test for Flat & Elongated Particles

COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TEXAS GYRATORY COMPACTOR (TGC) PART I COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TGC. Test Procedure for

Binder Modified with a Combination of PPA and SBS: The NCAT Test Track Experience PPA Workshop April 7, 2009

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Quality Assurance

TexSys: Guide for Selecting HMA for Texas Flexible Pavements

Inspection and Approval of Asphalt Mix Design Laboratories

Inspection and Acceptance of Asphalt Mix Design Laboratories

OHD L-44 METHOD OF TEST FOR MEASUREMENT OF WATER PERMEABILITY OF COMPACTED PAVING MIXTURES

OHD L-44 METHOD OF TEST FOR MEASUREMENT OF WATER PERMEABILITY OF COMPACTED PAVING MIXTURES

HCMTCB MATERIALS SAMPLING & TESTING PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST

WYDOT CONCRETE MIX DESIGN PROCEDURE

TxDOT Project : Material Design and Testing Methods for Home Made and Containerized Cold Mix

Forensic Analysis of a 22-Year Old 35% RAP Interstate Project

SECTION [ ] [02730] STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE SURFACING

DETERMINING DENSITY OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

IN-PLACE DENSITY WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 209 (16)

Five Years Later. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting March 9, William J. Pine, P.E. Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research

IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOIL AND SOIL- AGGREGATE BY NUCLEAR METHODS (SHALLOW DEPTH) FOP FOR AASHTO T 310

METHOD OF TEST FOR THEORETICAL MAXIMUM RELATIVE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES LS-264 R27 ASTM D2041/D2041M

Jan 10, 2002 LAB MANUAL

Calibration and Validation of the Shell Fatigue Model Using AC10 and AC14 Dense Graded Hot Mix Asphalt Fatigue Laboratory Data

Use Part II for absorptive mixtures that have more than 2.0 percent water absorption.

Separating Load from Moisture Effects in Wet Hamburg Wheel-Track Test

Illinois Center for Transportation

SPECIFICATION FOR REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL (RLT) TESTING FOR PAVEMENT MATERIALS

DETERMINING DENSITY OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

OHD L-43 METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINING RUTTING SUSCEPTIBILITY USING THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER

Apr 16, 2010 LAB MANUAL 1810

Tex-207-F, Determining Density of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures

T-24. A Practical Approach to Managing Density

Full Depth Reclamation ALDOT FDR Requirements Lyndi D. Blackburn, PE

Stop Chasing & Start Managing Density

IA ASPHALT EVAULATION PERFORMANCE EVAULATION

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTED SPECIMENS WITH LINEAR KNEADING COMPACTED SLABS USING THE HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING DEVICE

Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc. Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc.

Soil Aggregate *Nominal Maximum Minimum Weight No. of Splits to Obtain Designation Sieve Size of Particle of Sample, Ibs Portion for Test

Research to the applicability of the ITS-R test as a ravelling indicator for SMA mixtures

FINAL REPORT INVESTIGATION OF TEST METHODS, PAVEMENTS, AND LABORATORY DESIGN RELATED TO ASPHALT PERMEABILITY

IMPROVED RICE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES

Effect of Moisture Content of Wet Fly Ash on Basic Properties of Mortar and Concrete

SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND ABSORPTION OF AGGREGATE BY VOLUMETRIC IMMERSION METHOD

Improved Rice Method for Determining Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity of Asphalt Paving Mixtures

Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Florida Method of Test for MEASUREMENT OF WATER PERMEABILITY OF COMPACTED ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES

Sept 23, 2014 LAB MANUAL

Tex-207, Determining Density of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures

ATT-66/96, DENSITY TEST, ASBC CONTROL STRIP METHOD

Project Review Committee

Update on Latest Research

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2009/22. Final Report. Rebecca S. McDaniel Karol J. Kowalski Ayesha Shah Jan Olek Robert J. Bernhard

AMAP 15 th Annual Meeting February 18-20, Mike O Leary MWV RMAUPG

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z TROXLER ELECTRONICS LABORATORIES, INC. James Pratt Phone:

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 209 (12)

PRECISION ESTIMATES OF AASHTO T324, HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACK TESTING OFCOMPACTED HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) APPENDICES FOR FINAL REPORT

Specifier Note: Retain or delete material(s) below to conform to project requirements.

Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction

Transcription:

SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN Superpave Mix Design 1

Superpave Gyratory Compaction and Mixture Requirements Section objectives Describe the Superpave gyratory compactor Review the Superpave mixture requirements Summarize the moisture sensitivity test Final Result Participant will know the principles of the SGC and what mix criteria are included in the Superpave system Superpave Mix Design 2

Goals of Compaction Method Simulate field densification traffic climate Accommodate large aggregates Measure of compactability Conducive to QC Superpave Mix Design 3

Superpave Gyratory Compactor Basis Texas equipment French operational characteristics 150 mm diameter Up to 37.5 mm nominal size Height recordation??? Superpave Mix Design 4

height measurement reaction frame tilt bar control and data acquisition panel loading ram mold rotating base Superpave Mix Design 5

ram pressure 600 kpa 150 mm diameter mold 30 gyrations per minute 1.25 degrees (external) Superpave Mix Design 6

Common SGC Types Troxler Pine Brovold Interlaken 4140 4141 AFGC125X HM-293 AFG1A GYR-001 Rainhart 144 Superpave Mix Design 7

SGC Compaction Curve % G mm The increase in density (%Gmm) with each gyration is used to graph this compaction curve. 10 100 1000 Log Gyrations Superpave Mix Design 8

Gyratory Compaction We will evaluate the density of the HMA at two points: N initial N design These N s represent numbers of gyrations. Superpave Mix Design 9

Current AASHTO N design Table Compaction Level Traffic Level < 0.3 6 50 0.3 to < 3.0 7 75 Level Ninitial Ndesign 3.0 to < 30.0 8 100 > 30.0 9 125 Some States use different N design Tables Superpave Mix Design 10

Gyratory Compaction The density (G mb ) @ N design is the most important. This is where we will calculate the volumetric properties. N initial and N design are points at which we use to check the compactability and densification of the HMA. Superpave Mix Design 11

Four Steps for Superpave Mix Design 1. Materials Selection 2. Design Aggregate Structure TSR 3. Design Binder Content 4. Moisture Sensitivity Superpave Mix Design 12

Example Project Data- Project on I-43I Milwaukee, Wisconsin 18,000,000 ESAL Design Asphalt Overlay - 88 mm total thickness 38 mm - wearing course (12.5 mm NMAS) 50 mm - intermediate course (19 mm NMAS) Superpave Mix Design 13

4 Steps of Superpave Mix Design 1. Materials Selection 2. Design Aggregate Structure TSR 3. Design Binder Content 4. Moisture Sensitivity Superpave Mix Design 14

Step 1. Materials Selection Binder Selection Binder grade is specified in nearly all cases Selecting the supplier of the binder is most often based on cost. Aggregates Selection Choice of aggregates is usually limited to locally available materials Superpave Mix Design 15

Project Weather Conditions 52 55-32 -26-40 -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Pavement Temperature ( C),( Milwaukee, Wisc. Superpave Mix Design 16

PG 58-34 PG 52-28 28 Asphalt Binder Grades Milwaukee, Wisc. Climate Based Selection -40-30 -20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Pavement Temperature ( C),( Milwaukee, Wisc Superpave Mix Design 17

Binder Selection Milwaukee, Wisc PG 52-28 28 PG 58-34 Reliability(%) 50 74.5 99.9 99.6 Selected PG 58-34 Superpave Mix Design 18

Temp-Vis Relationship 5 PG 58-34 Binder Mix Temp Range: 165-172 C 1 Comp Temp Range: 151-157 C Viscosity, Pa-s 0.1 Compaction Range Mixing Range 0.05 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 Temperature, C Superpave Mix Design 19

Select Aggregates Available Stockpiles #1 stone 12.5 mm chip 9.5 mm chip Manufactured sand Screen sand Superpave Mix Design 20

Aggregate Properties Superpave Mix Design 21

Coarse Aggregate Angularity Test Results Aggr. 1+ Frac Faces Crit.. 2+ Frac Faces #1 Stone 92% 88% Crit. 12.5 mm Chip 97% 95% min 94% 90% min 9.5 mm Chip 99% 95% Superpave Mix Design 22

Fine Aggregate Angularity Aggregate Test Results % Air Voids Criterion Manufactured Sand 52% 45% min Screen Sand 40% Superpave Mix Design 23

Flat & Elongated Particles Aggregate Test Results #1 Stone 0% %Flat & Elongated Criterion 12.5mm Chip 0% 10% max. 9.5mm Chip 0% Superpave Mix Design 24

Sand Equivalent Aggregate Test Results Sand Equivalent Criterion Manufactured Sand 47 45 min Screen Sand 70 Superpave Mix Design 25

4 Steps of Superpave Mix Design 1. Materials Selection 2. Design Aggregate Structure TSR 3. Design Binder Content 4. Moisture Sensitivity Superpave Mix Design 26

Selection of Design Aggregate Structure Establish trial blends Check aggregate consensus properties Compact specimens Evaluate trial blends Select design aggregate structure Superpave Mix Design 27

Percent Passing 100 Gradation max density line control point nom max size max size 0.075.3 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0 Sieve Size, mm (raised to 0.45 power) Superpave Mix Design 28

100.0 IH-43 Trial Gradations 19.0 mm Nominal Mixture 90.0 80.0 % PASSING 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 Trial Blend 3 Trial Blend 2 Trial Blend 1 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.075 2.36 19.0 Sieve Size (mm) raised to 0.45 power Superpave Mix Design 29

Example Trial Blends Trail Blend 1 Trial Blend 2 Trial Blend 3 #1 Stone 25 30 10 ½ Chip 15 25 15 3/8 Chip 22 13 30 Mfg Sand 18 17 31 Scr. Sand 20 15 14 Superpave Mix Design 30

Aggregate Consensus Properties Blended aggregate properties are determined Property Criteria Blend 1 Blend 2 Blend 3 Coarse Ang. 95%/90% min. 96%/92% 95%/92% 97%/93% Fine Ang. 45% min. 46% 46% 48% Flat/Elongated 10% max. 0% 0% 0% Sand Equiv. 45 min. 59 58 54 Combined G sb n/a 2.699 2.697 2.701 Combined G sa n/a 2.768 2.769 2.767 Superpave Mix Design 31

Compact Specimens (Trial Blends) Establish trial asphalt binder content Establish trial aggregate weight Batch, mix, and compact specimens Determine N ini and N des Determine mixture properties Superpave Mix Design 32

Specimen Preparation Specimen height Mix design - 115 mm (4700 g) Moisture sensitivity - 95 mm (3500 g) Loose specimen for G mm (Rice) Sample size varies with NMAS 19 mm (2000 g) 12.5 mm (1500 g) 150 mm Superpave Mix Design 33

Batching Samples of Trial Blends Superpave Mix Design 34

Superpave Mix Design 35

Short Term Aging Two hours at the compaction temperature Superpave Mix Design 36

Superpave Mix Design 37

Superpave Mix Design 38

Superpave Mix Design 39

Measure G mb, G mm and calculate volumetric properties Superpave Mix Design 40

Superpave Mixture Requirements Specimen height Mixture volumetrics Air voids Voids in the mineral aggregate (VMA) Voids filled with asphalt (VFA) Dust proportion %Gmm @ N ini Superpave Mix Design 41

Trial Blend Results Property 1 2 3 Trial Binder Content 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% %G mm @ N des 96.2% 95.7% 95.2% %G mm @ N ini 87.1% 85.6% 86.3% %Air Voids 3.8% 4.3% 4.8% %VMA 12.7% 13.0% 13.5% %VFA 68.5% 69.2% 70.1% Dust Proportion 0.9 0.8 0.9 Superpave Mix Design 42

Estimated Volumetric at 4% AV P be = P bi 0.4 x (4-V a ) P be : estimated design asphalt content P bi : asphalt content used in trial blends VMA e = VMA i + C x (4-V a ) VMA e : estimated VMA at design asphalt content VMA i : initial VMA of trial blend C= constant: 0.1 when air voids < 4% and 0.2 when air voids > 4% Superpave Mix Design 43

Volumetric Design Criteria Traffic ESAL SGC Criteria N ini N des VMA VFA < 0.3 <91.5 see 70-80 < 3 <90.5 =96.0 slide 65-78 > 3 <89.0 53 65-75 Dust Binder 0.6 -to- 1.2 Superpave Mix Design 44

Compare Trial Blends to Mixture Criteria Blend 1 2 3 Criteria Binder Content 4.3% 4.5% 4.7% %G mm @ N ini 86.9% 85.9% 87.1% < 89% %Air Voids 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% %VMA 12.7% 13.0% 13.3% 13.0% %VFA 68.5% 69.2% 70.1% 65-75% Dust Proportion 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.6-1.2 Superpave Mix Design 45

Select Design Aggregate Structure What to do if none of the 3 trial blends are acceptable? Recombine aggregates to form further trial blends (i.e., Blend 4, Blend 5, etc.) Obtain new materials (aggregates, asphalt binder, modifiers) Superpave Mix Design 46

4 Steps of Superpave Mix Design 1. Materials Selection 2. Design Aggregate Structure TSR 3. Design Binder Content 4. Moisture Sensitivity Superpave Mix Design 47

Determining the Design Asphalt Content The selected trial blend becomes the design aggregate structure. Batch, mix, and compact more samples with this gradation with four asphalt contents. Determine volumetric properties Select P b at 4.0% air voids and check other volumetric properties. Superpave Mix Design 48

Superpave Mix Design 49

Design Binder Content Samples Binder Content 4.2% 4.7% 5.2% 5.7% %G mm @ N ini 85.7% 87.1% 87.4% 88.6% %G mm @ N des 94.6% 96.1% 97.1% 98.2% %Air Voids 5.4% 3.9% 2.9% 1.8% %VMA 13.3% 13.1% 13.3% 13.5% %VFA 59.4% 70.2% 78.2% 86.7% Dust Proportion 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 Superpave Mix Design 50

Densification Curves % MAX THEORETICAL DENSITY 98.0 96.0 89.0 85.0 80.0 75.0 I-43, 19.0 mm NMAS, Blend 3 4.2% AC 4.7% AC 5.2% AC 5.7% AC 1 10 100 1000 NUMBER OF GYRATIONS Superpave Mix Design 51

air voids Mix Air Voids Requirement % binder 4% at N des Regardless of the Traffic Level Superpave Mix Design 52

Air Voids - Example Mix Design 8.0 I-43 Binder Course, Blend 3 6.0 Air Voids = 4% 4.0 2.0 0.0 3.7 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.7 6.2 % ASPHALT BINDER Superpave Mix Design 53

Mix VMA Requirements Voids in the Mineral Aggregate VMA % binder NMAS, mm Minimum VMA, % 9.5 15.0 12.5 14.0 19.0 13.0 25.0 12.0 37.5 11.0 Superpave Mix Design 54

VMA Example Mix Design 14.5 I-43 Binder Course, Blend 3 VMA = 13.2% 13.5 12.5 3.7 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.7 6.2 % ASPHALT BINDER Superpave Mix Design 55

Mix VFA Requirements Voids Filled with Asphalt VFA Traffic 10 6 ESALs Range of VFA, % % binder < 0.3 70-80 < 1 65-78 < 3 65-75 > 3 65-75 Superpave Mix Design 56

VFA Example Mix Design 100.0 90.0 80.0 I-43 Binder Course, Blend 3 VFA = 70% 70.0 60.0 50.0 3.7 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.7 6.2 % ASPHALT BINDER Superpave Mix Design 57

Mix Requirement for Dust Proportion % weight of - 0.075 material 0.6 < < 1.2 % weight of effective asphalt 100 100 92 83 65 48 36 22 15 9 4 Unabsorbed binder in mix Superpave Mix Design 58

Dust Proportion Example Mix Design 1.8 I-43 Binder Course, Blend 3 DP = 0.9 1.2 0.6 0 3.7 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.7 6.2 % ASPHALT BINDER Superpave Mix Design 59

%G @ N mm ini 90.0 I-43 Binder Course, Blend 3 %G mm @ N ini = 87.1% 88.0 86.0 84.0 82.0 80.0 3.7 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.7 6.2 % ASPHALT BINDER Superpave Mix Design 60

Select Design Asphalt Binder Content Summary of Mixture Properties @ 4.7% AC Property Result Criteria %Air Voids 4.0% 4.0% %VMA 13.2% >13.0% %VFA 70% 65-75% D/A Ratio 0.9 0.6-1.2 %G mm @ N ini 87.1% <89% Superpave Mix Design 61

4 Steps of Superpave Mix Design 1. Materials Selection 2. Design Aggregate Structure TSR 3. Design Binder Content 4. Moisture Sensitivity Superpave Mix Design 62

Moisture Sensitivity AASHTO T 283 Measured on proposed aggregate blend and asphalt content 80 % minimum 3 Conditioned Specimens 3 Dry Specimens Tensile Strength Ratio Superpave Mix Design 63

AASHTO T 283 Conditioning Short term aging Loose mix 16 hrs @ 60 C Comp mix 72-96 hrs @ 25 C Two subsets with equal voids One dry One saturated 6 to 8 % air Dry 6 to 8 % air 55 to 80 % saturation Superpave Mix Design 64

AASHTO T 283 Conditioning Optional freeze cycle 16 hours @ -18 o C Hot water soak 24 hours @ 60 o C Superpave Mix Design 65

AASHTO T 283 Test Procedure 51 mm / min @ 25 o C Avg Dry Tensile Strength Avg Wet Tensile Strength Wet TSR = 80 % Dry Superpave Mix Design 66

Calculate %TSR %TSR = 100* = 100* Wet Strength Dry Strength 721 kpa 872 kpa = 82.6% Criterion is 80% minimum. Design asphalt mixture exceeds the minimum requirement. Superpave Mix Design 67

Design Asphalt Mixture Aggregate: 10% #1 Stone 15% 12.5mm Chip 30% 9.5mm Chip 31% Manuf. Sand 14% Screen Sand Asphalt Binder: 4.7% PG 58-34 Aggregate Gradation: 25 mm 100% 19.0 mm 97% 12.5 mm 89% 9.5 mm 77% 4.75 mm 44% 2.36 mm 32% 1.18 mm 22% 0.6 mm 15% 0.3 mm 8% 0.15 mm 4% 0.075 mm 3.5% Superpave Mix Design 68

Questions does it all make sense? Superpave Mix Design 69