Season-Long Patterns of Attraction of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug to Pheromone Lures and Light Traps in Orchard Agroecosystems

Similar documents
2.1 Developing Effective Monitoring Tools For Brown Marmorated Stink Bug

PHENOLOGY AND DISTRIBUTION OF BROWN MARMORATED STINK BUGS IN CALIFORNIA PEAR ORCHARDS

Phenology of Brown Marmorated Stink Bugs and Distribution near California Pear Orchards. (Funding provided by the Pear Pest Management Research Fund)

Phenology of Brown Marmorated Stink Bugs and Distribution near California Pear Orchards

Attraction of the Invasive Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) to Traps Baited with Semiochemical Stimuli Across the United States

PHENOLOGY AND DISTRIBUTION OF BROWN MARMORATED STINK BUGS IN AND NEAR CALIFORNIA PEAR ORCHARDS

Two New Invasive Pests in Washington: Spotted Wing Drosophila and Brown Marmorated Stink Bug

Volunteer Geographic Information: How Crowdsourced Data is Helping to Map the Spread of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug

Project Title: Chlorochroa ligata pheromone and development of management strategies

Navel orangeworm biology, monitoring, and management

Field Evaluation of a Novel Lure for Trapping Seedcorn Maggot Adults

Monitoring Methods for Codling Moth Dr. Jay Brunner, WSU TFREC, Wenatchee

Address: 5230 Konnowac Pass Rd Address: Dept. Entomology, Barton Lab City: Wapato City: Geneva

Prionus Mating Disruption and Trap Capture in Sweet Cherry 2011

Comparison of Two Yellow Sticky Traps for Capture of Western Cherry Fruit Fly (Rhagoletis indifferens) in Tart Cherry in Northern Utah 2015

Developing an Easily Used Bait Monitoring Method for Oriental Fruit Moth in Mating Disruption Orchards

CULTURE Dr. Gary C. Pavlis, Ph.D. Atlantic County Agricultural Agent

Advancements in Pest Management Monitoring for Food Processors

Comparison of kairomone DA 2313 and pheromone lure trapping for codling moth with oviposition monitoring

Project No: R Visual Lures for Possums. Malcolm Thomas and Fraser Maddigan. Pest Control Research Ltd PO Box 7223 Christchurch New Zealand

Figure 1. A) Sam Malan watches wasp choice test. B) Y-tube apparatus example.

USDA-ARS Areawide Tick IPM Project: Host-targeted Control

June NMFS Address 11, 2014 (NOAA): Council Address. Dover, DE 19901

Results of a Two-Year Pink Bollworm Survey in the Southern Plains of Texas and New Mexico

Result Demonstration Report

Presented to the ASMFC Horseshoe Crab Management Board October 17, 2017

Spotted Wing Drosophila: Research and Crop Infestation in 2012

Beet Leafhopper Monitoring with Yellow Sticky Cards. Andrew Jensen, WSPC

2014 House Fly Densities around Dairies in Central Texas

Balance in the Bay. An introduction to ecosystem-based management and the Monterey Bay market squid fishery.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) workshop: with particular reference to grasshopper management

MALL CROSSING STUDY. Testing the Effectiveness Of the 4th Street East Crossing. For: City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Development Services

Conditioned Alarm Behavior in Fathead Minnows (Pimephales promelas) and Test Their Ability

Dear Volunteer: Sincerely, Anne Coles. President, Alberta Trappers Association. RFMA Log Book- Trapping Season 2017/18 Page 1

MarketNews. Fresh Processing 91, Crop 2017 Crop 2018 Crop

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

National Haemaphysalis longicornis (longhorned tick) Situation Report July 17, 2018

Understanding the Regional Divergence in Adult Mortality in the United States

Egg+Nymphal Development with fitted model using Tlow=54F. Fitted to Tlow=50F

EFFECTS OF PREDATION ON THE BEHAVIOR OF GAMMARUS MINUS

New developments in pest control and monitoring

2014 EVALUATION OF HOUSE FLY DEMONSTRATION. COOPERATORS: James Colby Moreland and Jody & Robin Thomas

Hood Canal Steelhead Project A conservation hatchery experiment. Joy Lee Waltermire

Managing Burrowing Mammals

Resources for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and Varroa Mite Control

TAKE A CHANCE PART 2

SECTION SEVEN. Characteristics of People with IDD and Staff in Large Public Residential Facilities

Oregon Hatchery Research Center January 2014 David L. G. Noakes, Professor & Director

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

Zions Bank Municipal Conference Economic Overview August 13, 2015

Management and Control of Asian Carps in the United States. Greg Conover Asian Carp Working Group, Chair USFWS, Carterville FRO

scaffolds I N S E C T S HOT SAWS F R U I T J O U R N A L Update on Pest Management and Crop Development September 7, 2010 VOLUME 19, No.

Tautog PID for Amendment 1. Presented to the Tautog Board August 5, 2015

DEC DASHBOARD. Positive Response Compliance DEC. Compliant Tickets : On-Time Performance Analysis. December % Late.

Draft Addendum IV for Public Comment. American Eel Management Board August 2014

10:00 A.M. TO 12:00 NOON CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM 4-H Environmental Science Action Team Meeting October 28, :00 AM UME Anne Arundel County

Adaptation to climate variation in a diversified fishery:

2016 River Use Statistics -by Steve Sullivan

Managing Vertebrate Pests

Remote Monitoring of Dolphins and Whales in the High Naval Activity Areas in Hawaiian Waters

INLAND MARITIME INITIATIVE: FOREST CARNIVORES. Winter 2011 Update

Useful Tools in Mosquito Surveillance

PERMIT TO ALLOW MINOR USE AND SUPPLY OF AN AGVET CHEMICAL PRODUCT

ARkAnsAs tennessee Primary Partner: Primary Partner: Habitat Work: Habitat Work:

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

FERALS IN THE CLASSROOM. Designed by the Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Invasive Animals CRC

Bonita Creek Fish Monitoring November 4 6, 2015

Marine Mammals of the Southeast Atlantic

Humane State Ranking 2018 (Montana through Wyoming)

Cotton Comments OSU Southwest Oklahoma Research and Extension Center Altus, OK

Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Lawrence Downs Casino and Racing Resort Public Input Hearing

MarketNews. Fresh Apple Holdings at 85.7 Million Bushels. February 1 U.S. Holdings. Table of Contents

Zions Bank Economic Overview

Pest animal control. Guiding principles for community groups and landowners

Where now for slug control without Draza?

Office of Science & Technology

2009 National Pharmacist Workforce Study. Visual Data

Traffic Safety Facts. State Traffic Data Data. Overview

2018 PENNSYLVANIA FACT BOOK

Previous Work on the Culture of the Cocahoe Minnow Fundulus grandis

Capturing and Handling Wild Animals

Catch and Recapture Rates of Tweed Salmon and the Effect of Recaptures on the Catch Statistics

A NEW ERADICATION STRATEGY FOR SMALL, REMOTE GYPSY MOTH INFESTATIONS


Climate and Fish Population Dynamics: A Case Study of Atlantic Croaker

Traps for Monitoring Apple Pests in Ohio

Assessment of Guide Reporting & Preliminary Results of Lion Monitoring

IPM Credentials Why am I here talking about IPM and wildlife control?

Analysis of 2015 Trail Usage Patterns along the Great Allegheny Passage

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED. Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

MAR DASHBOARD MAR. Compliant % Breakdown Mar % Late % On-time MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2005 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AMERICAN EEL (Anguilla rostrata) Prepared by:

Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

2001 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH (Cynoscion regalis)

Abstract J. ent. Soc. Ont. 143: JESO Volume 143, Optimization of synthetic pheromone blend for C. rosaceana

Wildlife Vehicle Collision Study

Report on Science Center Activities

Prewitt Reservoir LAST UPDATED: JANUARY 2016 FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Mandi Brandt - Aquatic Biologist (Brush)

SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

Transcription:

Season-Long Patterns of Attraction of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug to Pheromone Lures and Light Traps in Orchard Agroecosystems Tracy C. Leskey, Starker Wright, Ashot Khrimian, Aijun Zhang, Don Weber, George Hamilton, Dean Polk, Cesar Rodriguez-Saona, Anne Nielsen, Joanne Whalen, Greg Krawczyk, Paula Shrewsbury, Gerry Brust, Yong-Lak Park, Galen Dively, Chris Bergh, Tom Kuhar, Doug Pfeiffer, Peter Jentsch, Art Agnello, Celste Welty, Jim Walgenbach, Mark Abney, Peter Shearer, Nik Wiman, and Jay Brunner

Development of Effective Detection and Monitoring Tools Tools that provide accurate measurements of presence, abundance, and seasonal activity of BMSB. Growers can make informed management decisions.

Key Components: Earlier Studies Visual Stimulus Large black pyramid Olfactory Stimulus methyl (2E,4E,6Z)-decatrienoate Capture Mechanism Tapered pyramid to inverted funnel jar with DDVP toxicant strip Deployment Strategy Traps placed in peripheral row of orchard

Methyl (2E, 4E, 6Z)- decatrieonate. Pheromone of Plautia stali Cross attractive to brown marmorated stink bug and other pentatomids. Reports from Asia and U.S.

Will BMSB Respond to Methyl (2E, 4E, 6Z)-Decatrienoate in the early-season? Reports of earlyseason attraction in Asia. Previous trials had relied on low doses (<5 mg). Evaluated 66 mg lures.

Despite Reports in the Asian Literature, Our Only Attractant Fails During the Early- and Mid-Season Methyl (2E,4E,6Z)-decatrieonate (MDT) attractive to adults only during the late-season. Confirmed in MD, WV, NJ, PA, VA and other states in 2011. Not attractive to adults in early- and mid-season.

Almost No Captures in Traps Baited with MDT, Despite Very Large Immigrating Populations Mean No. Per Trap 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Serious Early-Season Invasion Period Sample Date

Identification of BMSB Aggregation Pheromone

Identification of the BMSB Aggregation Pheromone 9-30 September 2011 1000 a Mean No. Per Trap 800 600 400 200 b b b b 0 #2 #6 #9 #10 Unbaited Treatment Traps baited with #10 captured ~15x more than control and ~3-4x more than other treatments.

Is #10 Attractive in the Early Season? Pre-Trial (March 20-April 17, 2012)

Early Season Attraction Documented for BMSB March 20-April 17, 2012 N = 77 BMSB N = 8 BMSB

Biology, Ecology, and Management of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug in Orchard Crops, Small Fruit, Grapes, Vegetables, and Ornamentals USDA-NIFA SCRI Project USDA-ARS Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, Newark, DE Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, Beltsville, MD Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR The Pennsylvania State University Washington State University North Carolina State University Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Rutgers University Northeastern IPM Center Oregon State University University of Maryland University of Delaware Cornell University Photo Courtesy of Chris Bergh

Broad Validation in Multi-State Trial Is BMSB attracted to #10 in the early season? Is BMSB attracted to #10 season-long? How attractive is this stimulus relative to MDT and unbaited traps? WV, MD, VA, PA, NJ, NY, DE, NC, OR, WA, and OH

Leveraged and In-Kind Support USDA-ARS USDA-APHIS AgBio Sterling/Rescue Total of 350 Traps Deployed Across 12 States

General Protocol Black pyramid traps Three odor treatments 1) #10 (10 mg) 2) MDT (> 100 mg) 3) unbaited control Traps are deployed between wild host habitat and agricultural production area. Traps were deployed in mid-april and left in place season-long.

Early Season Summary Mid-April to Mid-June 2012 1.8 Mean No. Per Trap 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Trap Capture Ratios #10:Unbaited 11 : 1 MDT:Unbaited 1 : 1 #10:MDT 9 : 1 0.4 0.2 0 19-Apr 26-Apr 3-May 10-May 17-May 24-May 31-May 7-Jun 14-Jun Sample Date #10 MDT Control BMSB reliably captured by traps baited with #10. These captures represents invading overwintering adults during early season.

Mid-Season Summary Mid-June to Mid-August 0.7 Mean No. Per Trap 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Trap Capture Ratios #10:Unbaited 7 : 1 MDT:Unbaited 4 : 1 #10:MDT 2 : 1 0.1 0 25-Jun 2-Jul 9-Jul 16-Jul 23-Jul 30-Jul 6-Aug 13-Aug Sample Date #10 MDT Control Low numbers during much of mid-season. Increasing populations beginning in mid-july.

Mean No. Per Trap 80 70 60 50 40 30 Late-Season Summary Mid-August to Mid-October Trap Capture Ratios #10:Unbaited 12 : 1 MDT:Unbaited 90 : 1 MDT:#10 7 : 1 20 10 0 20-Aug 3-Sep 17-Sep 1-Oct Sample Date #10 MDT Control MDT very attractive and #10 attractive in late season. MDT outcompetes #10 in late season at tested release rates. Large numbers in the field.

Seasonal Adult Captures 1 0.9 0.8 280 ~13 : 1 15,332 ~22 : 1 0.7 Proportional Captures 0.6 0.5 0.4 644 ~11 : 1 482 ~8 : 1 #10 MDT Control 0.3 4,489 ~7 : 1 0.2 0.1 34 ~2 : 1 22 61 687 0 Early (mid-april to mid-june) Middle (mid-june to mid-august) Late (mid-august to mid-october) Sampling Period

Seasonal Nymphal Captures 1 0.9 11 0.8 0.7 12,856 ~19 : 1 14, 489 ~22 : 1 Proportional Captures 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 5,356 ~8 : 1 4,342 ~7 : 1 #10 MDT Control 0.2 2 0.1 0 0 Early (mid-april to mid-june) Middle (mid-june to mid-august) Late (mid-august to mid-october) 687 663 Samping Period

Dose Response Trial June 14-July 19, 2012 11:1 Ratio (Baited: Unbaited) for 10 mg lure ~25:1 Ratio (Baited: Unbaited) for 100 mg lure Mean No. BMSB Per Trap 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Adults Shepherdstown a Keedysville a ab b b b b b b b Control 0.1 mg 1 mg 10 mg 100 mg Dose Mean No. BMSB Per Trap 250 200 150 100 50 0 a Nymphs Shepherdstown Keedysville a b b ab b a b b b b b c Control 0.1 mg 1 mg 10 mg 100 mg Dose

Lure Affordability: Encouraging Results from Purity Trial a a a b

Commercial Lure Trials Company Participants Formulation #1 Formulation #2 ISCA Scentry USDA, WVU, OSU, Cornell, UMD, Rutgers USDA, Rutgers #10 Control 15 (splat) 53 (septa) 105 26 5 N/A 23 3 Alpha Scents USDA, PSU 111 (membrane) 83 (septa) 256 33 Hercon Sterling Trece USDA, WVU, OSU USDA, PSU, Rutgers USDA, OSU, Cornell 23 N/A 76 13 76 N/A 121 43 68 N/A 93 43

Conclusions Aggregation pheromone of BMSB has been identified. This stimulus provides reliable, seasonlong detection of BMSB. Likely will need a higher loading of material. Crude material can be used to formulate lures, reducing overall costs. MDT is very sensitive stimulus in the lateseason.

Visual Cues Identifying Optimal Wavelengths and Intensities of Light

Experimental Light Traps

Night View

A Total of 21 Traps Baited With Light-Based Stimuli Captured 13,457 Adult BMSB in ~6 Weeks During Late Summer 180 a Mean No. Per Trap 160 140 120 100 80 60 a a Blue provided greatest level of species-specificity. Fewer non-targets captured. a 40 ab 20 0 b b White Black Blue Green Yellow Red Control Visual Stimulus

Traps Provisioned With Blue 25W Compact Fluorescent Bulbs Attractive and Species-Specific

Season-Long Trial 2012 Do we capture BMSB reliably with the most attractive stimuli? Species-specificity of most attractive visual stimuli?

Mean Weekly Captures Mean No. Adult BMSBs Per Trap 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 BMSB Captures a b c c White Blue Black Control Mean No. Nontargets Per Trap 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Nontarget Captures a ab b c White Blue Black Control

Season-Long Captures of BMSB 60 50 Mean No. Adults Per Trap 40 30 20 Blue Black White Control 10 0 Sample Date

Conclusions Traps provisioned with a white light source captured significantly more BMSBs and significantly more non-targets. Traps provisioned with blue light sources captured fewer BMSBs, but also fewer nontargets. Although captures of BMSB were lower in traps provisioned with black light sources, patterns of capture are significantly correlated among all light-based stimuli. Capture patterns essentially identical among white, blue and black light sources.

Next Steps Establish physiological and behavioral state of responders to different stimuli. Combining attractive visual and olfactory stimuli. Improve monitoring tools. Develop attract and kill strategies.

Acknowledgements USDA-ARS, USDA NIFA SCRI # 2011-51181-30937, and USDA-APHIS BMSB SCRI Team and Working Group Doo-Hyung Lee Starker Wright Sean Wiles Brent Short John Cullum Jeanne Sullivan Cameron Scorza Brittany Rankin Teresa Mersing Torri Hancock Zoe Milburn