Mouth of the Columbia River Jetties Three-Phase Construction Plan

Similar documents
Response of a Newly Created Marsh-Wetland Affected by Tidal Forcing, Upland Discharge, and Groundwater Interaction

Southwest Washington Littoral Drift Restoration Project: Design, Construction, and Monitoring

PNWA Conference Update

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2009

Mouth of the Columbia River North Jetty Erosion Stabilization

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

Evaluating Extreme Storm Power and Potential Implications to Coastal Infrastructure Damage, Oregon Coast, USA

North Shore of Long Island, Feasibility Study

Ketchikan Harbors Thomas Basin and Bar Point Harbor

Grays Harbor O&M and Deepening Dredging

CALCASIEU SALINITY STRUCTURES. HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING (To Support Design of Salinity Barriers)

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Louisiana CPRA SJB Group, Baton Rouge Coastal Engineering Consultants U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Federal and State PDT Members

SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

100-YEARS OF SHOAL EVOLUTION AT THE MOUTH OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER: IMPACTS ON CHANNEL, STRUCTURES, AND SHORELINES

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

1-22. KETCHIKAN, ALASKA (Thomas and Bar Point Basins) (CWIS NOS & 87071) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2007

Grays Harbor Federal Project

Cordova Harbor Page 2 of 9

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

EVALUATION OF BEACH EROSION UP-DRIFT OF TIDAL INLETS IN SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, USA. Mohamed A. Dabees 1 and Brett D.

Town of Duck, North Carolina

Assateague Island National Seashore North End Restoration Project Timeline

Ninilchik Harbor Page 2 of 11

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

1-44. SITKA HARBOR, ALASKA (Western Channel, Crescent Bay Basin, Channel Rock Breakwaters) (CWIS NOS , 16840, 10322, 55030, 13787)

Juneau Douglas Harbor

Redondo Beach Boat Launch Ramp Facility

CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM PERTINENT DATA

APPENDIX C. Fluvial and Tidal Hydraulics Report

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Assessment

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering - Volume 14 COASTAL STABILIZATION. Richard Silvester John R C Hsu. \v? World Scientific

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

PLAQUEMINES PARISH BARRIER ISLAND RESTORATION & SUSTAINABILITY. MVD/Gulf Coast Regional Dredging Meeting November 5, 2013

Beach Restoration in Okaloosa and Walton Counties. FSBPA Technology Conference Clearwater, FL

Evaluation of Placement Alternatives for Matagorda Ship Channel Bottleneck Removal

Shoalwater Bay Shorline Erosion Dredging

Absecon Island Shore Protection The planning behind the project

Beach Renourishment in Jacksonville

Impact of Hurricane Matthew on the Atlantic Coast of Florida

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

City of Del Mar Local Coastal Plan (LCP) Amendment for Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

AD-A II~lllII I I 7

Unit 11 Lesson 2 How Does Ocean Water Move? Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

4/20/17. #32 - Coastal Erosion Case Histories - Lake Michigan

Chapter 4 EM THE COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL (Part I) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents. Page. I-4-1. Background...

MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC. Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP)

Shorelines Earth - Chapter 20 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Coastal Environments Oceanographic and Engineering Expertise

Oceans and Coasts. Chapter 18

Proceedings, 2001National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, pp COASTAL INLET BANK EROSION. William C.

Inner-Bank Erosion Processes and Solutions at Coastal Inlets

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

HERBERT HOOVER DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT

Texas passes, longshore transport, hurricanes, beach erosion and sea level

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

APPENDIX M DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMMP) FINAL INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

SHORE PROTECTION AND HABITAT CREATION AT SHAMROCK ISLAND, TEXAS ABSTRACT

Chapter 15 SEASONAL CHANGES IN BEACHES OP THE NORTH ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES

2018 Beach Preservation Project Information

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

USE OF SEGMENTED OFFSHORE BREAKWATERS FOR BEACH EROSION CONTROL

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

KEYNOTE PRESENTATION FSBPA olsen

DUNE STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION

BALD HEAD ISLAND, NC SAND SHARING SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT. Erik J. Olsen, P.E. olsen associates, inc.

Bay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 14, 2018

DELAWARE S VULNERABLE COASTAL AREAS. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS and DELAWARE BAY RECONNAISSANCE STUDY

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

Coastal management has lagged behind the growth in population leading to problems with pollution

Juneau Aurora Harbor

page - Laboratory Exercise #5 Shoreline Processes

Town of Duck, North Carolina

Door County, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. August 21, 2017

Photo by: Darryl Hatheway, 2011

NAVIGATION STUDY FOR LAKE WORTH INLET, FLORIDA DRAFT INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX A ENGINEERING

Figure 262. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 279

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the major environments on Mustang Island.

Feasibility Study for Restoration of Titlow Lagoon Fish Passage. South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group

Climate Change Impacts to KSC Launch Complex

Recycling of Surplus Sand to Extend the Time Between Beach Fill Episodes

Overview. Beach Features. Coastal Regions. Other Beach Profile Features. CHAPTER 10 The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes.

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

6/19/2006 The Reef Ball Foundation 1

INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING

Baraga County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. July 12, 2018

Beach Dune Performance Assessment of. New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) Sites at. Long Beach Island, New Jersey. After Hurricane Sandy

Long Beach Island Holgate Spit Little Egg Inlet Historical Evolution Introduction Longshore Transport Map, Survey and Photo Historic Sequence

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

Transcription:

Mouth of the Columbia River Jetties Three-Phase Construction Plan Project Overview October 9, 2012 US Army Corps of Engineers

MCR Jetties Major Rehabilitation Sand Island pile dikes 1930-1935 Columbia River Estuary Jetty A 1 mile long 1938-39 Clatsop Spit Peacock Spit North Jetty 2.5 miles long 1914-1917 Pacific Ocean South Jetty 6 miles long 1885-1913 2

BC WA Pacific OR Ocean CA 3 MAR 1999 - Tropical Storm 29 AUG 2005 - Hurricane 3

UNIQUE CHALLENGES for Jetties & Navigation at the Mouth of the Columbia River MCR is a zone of interaction between severe forces regular occurrence Normal River Flow = 100,000 400,000 cfs Average Tidal Range = 8 ft, occurring 2x daily Average Wave Height during Oct. April = 11 ft OR-WA coast exposed to an average of 4 hurricane-like storms per year 11 such storms may occur in a given year having waves > 22 ft high Storm Surge = 3 to 5 ft + Transient set-up of 2 to 5 ft 4

15 miles offshore Storms: SUN (13 NOV) and WED (15 NOV) 2006 Tide at 1.5 ft MLLW Tide at 3 ft MLLW 1100 PST Hourly-averaged Wave Height 5-DAYS During November 2006 5 5

13 "Open" Coast Storm Surge Comparison Hurricane (GOM) vs. Extr. Low (PacNW) 12 11 10 Toke Pt, WA SW Pass, LA Total Surge Level, ft 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Days during Storm 6

7

Three-Phase Construction Plan 1. South Jetty dune augmentation/stabilization 2. North Jetty: lagoon fill and critical repairs 3. Major rehabilitation of all three jetties 8

South Jetty: The Observed Historic Movement of the Shoreline 9

FY 13 (PBUD): South Jetty Dune Augmentation/Stabilization South Jetty Root & Trestle Bay: $5.5M Letter report, P&S, beach material placement Without-project condition (separate from major maintenance and rehab construction) 10

MCR North Jetty - Construction and Repair History (Has receded approximately 1800 in length since 1916.) 1965 2005 1939 1917 11

North Jetty Lagoon Fill Losing: 1.14 acres of wetlands 4.71 acres of waters of the U.S. Locating, developing mitigation site Replacing jetty road culvert Redirect stream away from lagoon wetlands Redirect overland flow away from jetty root; stabilize foundation 12

Second Phase of Construction: MCR North Jetty FY 13 Capability, O&M Major Maintenance Report supports two separate actions: (1) Lagoon Fill: $10.84M stabilizes jetty s foundation (2) Critical Repairs: $14.15M rehabs degraded reach Critical Repairs STA 86-99 Lagoon Fill 13

Major Rehabilitation Plan, CG Major Rehabilitation Report (MRR) supported actions for all three jetties Based on stochastic, risk-based numerical model using design waves. The sequence and magnitude of seven-year rehab plan will be adjusted based on jetty monitoring triggering immediate repairs: 35% remaining x-section above -5 MLLW. No spur groins included in the current design head stabilization for the North Jetty and Jetty A. District will obtain environmental permitting per forecasted construction schedule. Fully funded, feasibility level design in 2012 dollars: total project costs will be approximately $257M over a seven-year construction schedule which is funding dependent from 2014 through 2020. Overall costs are estimated as follows: North Jetty at $80M; South Jetty at $147M; and Jetty A at $30M. 14

Major Rehabilitation Plan, CG Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (BCR), Major Rehabilitation Report North Jetty: 1.09 South Jetty: 1.00 System BCR: 1.10 Jetty A: 1.42 The project s base condition theoretically prevents a jetty breach ; project navigation benefits aren t at risk. The major rehab effort doesn t produce a high benefit-to-cost ratio because the project prevents a jetty breach and sediment from blocking the navigation channel. With inclusion of the base condition as the recommended plan for the South Jetty, project feature benefits are essentially treated as equaling costs, despite substantial benefits of maintaining navigation at the project. Protecting the Columbia River navigation channel entrance (105 miles, 43 feet deep; $182M channeldeepening project completed in 2010) and the Columbia/Snake River system is paramount. Over $20B of cargo annually travels through the entrance protected by MCR Jetties; and over $900M in new infrastructure investment has been made to date in the Pacific Northwest since 2010. 15

120 Mouth of the Columbia River Jetty System Rehabilitation - Selected Plan (Construction Schedule: For stone placement on Jetties and existing stone re-work) 100 92 103 99 104 102 91 99 Tons of Stone (1000 tons) 80 60 40 53 Does NOT include stone tonnage associated with North Jetty root stabilization (lagoon fill) and jetty spurgroins for North Jetty, South Jetty A - Scheduled Repairs Hold Length 20 North Jetty - Scheduled Repairs Hold Length South Jetty - Base Condition 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction Year 16

700,000 NORTH Jetty Actual Year by Tons Placed Previous and Future Project Conditions 600,000 Initial Construction Tons 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 Rehabilitation Repair Repair SCHEDUELD REPAIRS Selected Plan - MRR 0 1885 1895 1905 1915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 Year 17

250,000 JETTY "A" Actual Year by Year Tons Placed Previous and Future Project Conditions Initial Construction 200,000 Tons 150,000 100,000 Rehabilitation Repair SCHEDULED REPAIR Selected Plan - MRR 50,000 Rehabilitation Repairs 0 1885 1895 1905 1915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 Year 18

600,000 Added Construction (sta. 250-375) SOUTH Jetty Actual Year by Year Tons Placed Previous and Future Project Conditions 500,000 Tons 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 Initial Construction (sta. 2-250) Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Repairs Repair Repairs FUTURE BASE CONDITION Selected Plan - MRR 0 1885 1895 1905 1915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 Year 19

20

21

22

23

Jetty Cross-Section Damage Documented Using Jetty Topography Developed from Aerial photography Damage Areas Example for Assessing Condition of MCR Jetties using Survey data: - Evaluate Need to Initiate Repairs 24 (based on damage threshold) - Calculate the Amount of Jetty Damage (for Repair Estimate)

Example of Undamaged Jetty Surface (design template) - Contour Lines Plan View Northing, ft 955200 955400 955600 955800 Channel Side of Jetty Ocean Side of Jetty 7301500 7301700 7301900 7302100 7302300 7302500 7302700 7302900 7303100 7303300 7303500 7303700 7303900 7304100 7304300 7304500 Easting, ft 3,200 ft BLUE Lines indicate surface elvation of FULL UndamagedJetty Template for -10 ft, 0 ft, and 25 ft elevation Elevation in ft MLLW OR SPCS, north NAD83, ft 25

Example of Damaged Jetty Surface - Contour Lines Plan View Northing, ft 955200 955400 955600 955800 Channel Side of Jetty Ocean Side of Jetty 7301500 7301700 7301900 7302100 7302300 7302500 7302700 7302900 7303100 7303300 7303500 7303700 7303900 7304100 7304300 7304500 Easting, ft 3,200 ft RED Lines indicate elevation of DAMAGED jetty surface for 0 ft, 10 ft, and 25 ft elevations Elevation in ft MLLW OR SPCS, north NAD83, ft 26

Example of Comparing Undamaged Jetty Surface to Damaged Jetty Surface Contour Lines Plan View Northing, ft 955200 955400 955600 955800 Channel Side of Jetty Ocean Side of Jetty 7301500 7301700 7301900 7302100 7302300 7302500 7302700 7302900 7303100 7303300 7303500 7303700 7303900 7304100 7304300 7304500 Easting, ft 3,200 ft BLUE Lines indicate surface elvation of FULL UndamagedJetty Template for -10 ft, 0 ft, and 25 ft elevation RED Lines indicate elevation of DAMAGED jetty surface for 0 ft, 10 ft, and 25 ft elevations Elevation in ft MLLW OR SPCS, north NAD83, ft 27

-22 Example of Calculating Damage to Jetty y subtracting the Damaged Jetty Surface from the Undamaged Condition Plan View Northing, ft 955200 955400 955600 955800 Channel Side of Jetty Ocean Side of Jetty 7301500 7301700 7301900 7302100 7302300 7302500 7302700 7302900 7303100 7303300 7303500 7303700 7303900 7304100 7304300 7304500 Easting, ft 3,200 ft BLUE Lines indicate surface elvation of FULL UndamagedJetty Template for -10 ft, 0 ft, and 25 ft elevation FT Below FULL Undamaged Template (damage to repair) 0-2 -4-8 Elevation in ft MLLW OR SPCS, north NAD83, ft 28-15

30 25 Jetty Cross Section Status GREEN ----------- Continue to Asses Jetty Condition with Bi-annual Monitoring Surveys ------------- FULL Jetty Template Observed Jetty Condition: 20% Damage 20 Elevation, ft, MLLW 15 10 5 0-5 Damage To Jetty Cross-section Missing Material 80% of the cross-section remaining Above -5 ft MLLW (upper cross-section) -10-15 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Distance, ft 29

30 25 Jetty Cross Section Status AMBER ----------- Initiate 2-year Planning Sequence for Jetty Repairs at 40% DAMAGE ------------- FULL Jetty Template Observed Jetty Condition: 35% Damage Elevation, ft, MLLW 20 15 10 5 0-5 Damage To Jetty Cross-section Missing Material 65% of the cross-section remaining Above -5 ft MLLW (upper cross-section) -10-15 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Distance, ft 30

30 25 Jetty Cross Section Status RED ----------- Jetty has been DAMAGED >> 40%, Initiate Elevated Status for Executing Jetty Repairs ------------- FULL Jetty Template Observed Jetty Condition: 70% Damage Elevation, ft, MLLW 20 15 10 5 0-5 Damage To Jetty Cross-section Missing Material 30% of the cross-section remaining Above -5 ft MLLW (upper cross-section) -10-15 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Distance, ft 31

40 30 20 10 North Jetty CROSS SECTION Life-Cycle Evolution (1917-2006) for STA =84.5 Dynamic Stability Direct Wave Attack channel side Overtopping Damage channel side UPPER Cross-section Wave Overtopping Damage ocean side Direct Wave Attack ocean side Elevation, MLLW, ft 0-10 -20-30 Slope Failure Toe Scour -1.5 m MLLW Blue = initial condition (IC) 1917 LOWER Cross-section -40-50 Static Stability -60-150 -100-50 0 50 100 150 Distance from Centerline, ft CHANNEL SIDE 32 OCEAN/ BUILDING BEACH STRONG SIDE

Jetty Template Area* ft², above WAV_EL = -5 ft WAV_EL, ft MLLW Crest Elevation, ft MLLW Crest Width, ft Side slope (rise,v : run,h) Channel / Ocean North Jetty 2250 max(-5, TE+2) 25 30 1:1.5 / 1:1.5 South Jetty 2475 max(-5, TE+2) 25 30 1:2 / 1:1.5 Jetty A 1687 max(-5, TE+2) 20 30 1:1.5 / 1:1.5 UPPER Cross-section Jetty Maintenance Scenario - 5 ft MLLW - 5 ft MLLW Thresholds for Jetty Maintenance Based on Remaining % of Cross- Section Area Normal Jetty Segment REPAIR UPPER Threshold to Enact Repair Repair Planning Period 33 LOWER Threshold to Enact Repair Jetty Segment Hardship EXPEDITED Repair Threshold BREACH THRESHOLD (BT) Just-in-Time (fix-as-fails) 25-30% n/a 20-25% 20-25% 15-20% Scheduled V Variable (25 65%) 4 yrs n/a 20-25% 15-20% Interim Repairs 25-40% n/a 20 25% 20-25% 15-20% Scheduled F 62-72% 4 yrs n/a 20-25% 15-20%

MCR Jetties: Key Messages (1) FY 13: South Jetty dune stabilization/augmentation; PBUD (O&M) -- $5.5M South Jetty Root & Trestle Bay Detailed Design Report, P&S, placement of beach material Without-project condition (separate from 7-year construction plan) (2) FY 13: North Jetty lagoon fill, Capability (O&M) -- $10.84M Stabilizes North Jetty root Supported by FY 11 Major Maintenance Report (3) FY 13: North Jetty critical repairs, Capability (O&M) -- $14.15M Repairs to STA 86 99, authorized cross-section Supported by FY 11 Major Maintenance Report 34

MCR Jetties: Key Messages (4) FY 14: Jetty A Rehabilitation, Capability (CG) -- $22.90M Detailed Design Report, Plans & Specifications, Contract Award Construction in FY 15, STA 48-84 Supported by FY 12 Major Rehabilitation Report (5) FY 14: North Jetty Rehabilitation, Capability (CG) -- $23.65M Detailed Design Report, Plans & Specifications, Contract Award Construction staging and delivery of rock; FY 15-17 construction Supported by FY 12 Major Rehabilitation Report (6) FY 14: Jetty head stabilization, Capability (CG) -- $550k Physical wave tank modeling for optimizing jetty head design Supported by FY 12 Major Rehabilitation Report 35