Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility Study Update

Similar documents
Amendments to Essex Highway Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Policy and Standards April 2008

Douglas Land Use and Transportation Strategy (DLUTS) Summary. August 2013

National Planning Framework National Development Plan ( )

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual-carriageways

Appendix 1 Transit Network Analysis

A127/A130 Fairglen Interchange Improvement Schemes. Information Leaflet February 2017

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual - Carriageways

Maynooth Traffic Management Plan & Traffic Model

CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY FOR DECISION

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

Launceston's Transport Futures. Greater travel options for the people of Launceston

RIVER CROSSINGS: EAST OF SILVERTOWN CROSSINGS

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

PIMMS CAPITAL Import Visit 2012 Ostrava Czech Republic 17 th January 2012

Land at Chesterton, Cirencester

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012

University of Leeds Travel Plan

GD 0043/18 ACTIVE TRAVEL STRATEGY

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Executive Board 4 July Transport Strategy - Future Public Transport Requirements

Wayfinding and Walking in London. Lilli Matson Transport for London May 2013

Douglas Land Use and Transportation Study

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND NATIONAL ROAD NETWORK INDICATORS March 2017

The Infrastructure Impact Tool

Road Traffic Estimates

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Active Travel Towns Funding Scheme Project Proposal. Sligo. Sligo Local Authorities

SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL TOWNS: RESULTS AND LESSONS

CUERDEN TRANSPORT PROPOSALS

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Transport Assessment & Traffic Modelling Report

Appendix B27 - Weekend and off-peak benefits

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Nottingham Cycle City Frequently Asked Questions

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Final Plan 20 December 2016

Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

The role of the Authority in promoting sustainable transport. Gerry Murphy South East Regional Assembly 27 th May 2011

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

Donegal National Roads Design Office. Phase 1: Scheme Feasibility Report. TEN-T Priority Route Improvement Project, Donegal

9. Parking Supporting Statement

Technical note. 1. Introduction

ENFIELD TOWN THE REVISED DESIGN

Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy & Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans

Our journey a 20 year Transport Manifesto for the North East

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

How are your travelling? Travel Diary in Cork

MILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING

Strategic Director for Environment. Enclosures Appendix A - Option drawings. Jamie Blake- Strategic Director for Environment

Regional Cycle Programme Update

Seal Extension Guidelines. Asset Management and Systems

smartertravel >>> The New Policy Framework for Transport in Ireland Aoife O Grady

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Regional Bus Priority

DOE Climate Change Proposals

Kildare National Roads Design Office. N81 Tallaght to Hollywood Cross NRI\~ National Roads Authority,;.~ tuj,,!il1 v.;; E:ilJ;u liisk!

Road to the future What road users want from Highways England s Route Strategies Summary report November 2016

WEST YORKSHIRE LTP CYCLE PROSPECTUS

TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND NATIONAL ROADS NETWORK INDICATORS April 2018

Integrated Regional Traffic Management. Michael Aherne Technical Director POLIS Conference 2009

1.5 On this basis it is fundamental that the Transport Strategy for the site focuses on the following key criteria,

Building a sustainable world city: the role of transport and land use in London. London s relationship with transport

The Limassol SUMP Planning for a better future. Apostolos Bizakis Limassol, May 16, th Cyprus Sustainable Mobility and ITS conference

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Project Description Form 6V

Guildford Borough (Draft)

BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE PREFERENCES A CASE STUDY OF DUBLIN

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

High frequency bus services operating to Little Island; Creation of a new Park and Ride site and train station at North Esk;

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Using smartphones for cycle planning Authors: Norman, G. and Kesha, N January 2015

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. Mount Pleasant Industrial Area Parking Strategy and Access Improvements

Progress with the Road Investment Strategy

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

Phone: Ref No: 06/2018/0884

Traffic Modelling and Intersection Analysis

The Route 29 Corridor Study was initiated at the request of Virginia s Commonwealth

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

North West Non-Technical Summary of the Transport Assessment September 2011

Joint Response to the Department for Transport Consultation on the Station Champions Report on Better Rail Stations. February 2010

PAEKĀKĀRIKI HILL ROAD / BEACH ROAD / SH1 INTERSECTION PROGRESS REPORT

Community engagement guide May 2018

Planning Daily Work Trip under Congested Abuja Keffi Road Corridor

City of Perth Cycle Plan 2029

Potential for a Public Bikes Scheme in Limerick Gerry Murphy

E4 Cycle Route Exeter University to Redhayes Bridge. - Recommendations from Exeter Cycling Campaign

Cycle network linking Wolverhampton city centre and Bilston town centre with employment sites and residential areas:

Bus and Transit Lane Review Update

York Scarborough Bridge Economic Appraisal Update Technical Note

US 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY

PERSONALISED TRAVEL PLANNING IN MIDLETON, COUNTY CORK

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. (A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)

4. Guided Bus Explained

Transcription:

Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility Study Update November 2008

Document Title: Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility Study Update Document Ref(s). : Date Rev Status Originator Checked Approved 01/12/08 Final César Almarza César Almarza Jon Williams Oct 2008 Page 2 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Review of the Pre-Feasibility Study... 5 3. New Data Obtained... 8 4. Discussion... 13 5. Conclusions... 17 Oct 2008 Page 3 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

1. Introduction Transport 21 is a capital investment framework under the National Development Plan through which the transport system in Ireland will be developed over the period 2006 to 2015. The projects and programmes that make up Transport 21 will aim to increase accessibility, ensure sustainability, expand capacity and enhance quality. The Atlantic Corridor from Letterkenny to Waterford via Sligo, Tuam, Ennis, Limerick, Mallow & Cork is one of the major roads projects to be delivered under Transport 21. The upgrading of this route is intended to improve access to and between the major towns and cities it serves, or passes close to, and their respective hinterlands. It also takes account of the growing commuter traffic in the areas around these major towns and cities. The M20 Cork Limerick Motorway scheme forms part of this Atlantic Corridor. The Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility Report was issued in December 2007. Its objective was to investigate and report on options for the National Primary Route connecting Limerick and Cork by two different corridors; the existing N20 (Western) corridor and an Eastern corridor connecting Limerick to the N8 near Mitchelstown. The study included consideration of the following items: - review and analysis of existing traffic data.; - Desktop study of major constraints. - Broad impacts on the objectives of the National Development Plan (NDP), National Spatial Strategy (NSS), County and Local Development Plans; - Indicative cost comparisons using a cost per km rate supplied by the NRA. The Pre-Feasibility Study assessed the two corridor options for the route between Limerick and Cork over the period from 2015 (assumed opening year) to 2030 (15 years after opening). This update report provides a summary of the main inputs and conclusions from the Pre-Feasibility Study. It then proceeds to assess the impacts of the additional traffic information collected during the development of the M20 Traffic Study, with a view to re-assessing the recommendation for the Western Corridor. Oct 2008 Page 4 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

2. Review of the Pre-Feasibility Study 2.1 Input Data for the Pre-Feasibility Study The Pre-Feasibility Study provides a very detailed description of existing conditions on both corridors. On the existing N20 (Western Corridor) the study highlights both technical and operational conditions. The technical aspects, describe the road as comprising a single carriageway of varying cross-section from Standard Single Carriageway to Reduced Single Carriageway except for an 8 km section of 2+1 type cross section. The key interchange with the N21 2 km south of Patrickswell is referred to as well as other significant junctions with National Secondary and Regional Roads, including the N72 in Mallow. The operational aspects of the Western Corridor are described. The existing N20 passes through the towns of Mallow and Charleville, and the villages of New Twopothouse and Buttevant, bypassing the towns of Blarney and Croom. Smaller settlements such as Rathduff, Banoge and Ballyhea are also mentioned. The western corridor will serve commuter demand between these main towns and this was one of the key reasons for recommending the western corridor. Other operational aspects are the major centres for commercial and industrial activity within the Western Corridor; these are highlighted as Mallow, Charleville (including the Lidl distribution centre and Ballybeg Limestone Quarry which is located 2 km south of Buttevant).. The description of Eastern Corridor is more geographical, as there are not major centres for commercial and industrial activity along the route. Kilmallock is the largest service town. Kilmallock performs essential functions including a market, services and an employment centre for south central County Limerick. 2.2 Differences between the two corridors The pre-feasibility study discusses the differences between both corridors. Strategic, engineering, environmental, economic, planning and traffic factors are some of the most important issues considered when making the recommendation. The strategic and traffic issues will be the factors re-assessed in this update. 2.2.1 Strategic and Planning factors The Cork and Limerick County Development Plans are described in the study, as their contents are essential during the consideration of corridor options for the Cork to Limerick route. Although both corridors would be similar in terms of attracting long distance traffic flows, the deciding factor will be the consideration of the potential developments of intermediate towns within the route. Mallow, according to the Cork County Development Plan, would be better served by the Western Corridor, as it would give the town a direct and high quality connection to both Cork and Limerick. Kilmallock, which has a similar importance in the Limerick County Development Plan would not be as well served by the Western Corridor. However policies with respect to environment in the Limerick County Development Plan outweigh this and would also favour the Western Corridor option. The Cork Area Strategic Plan which is also considered by the Pre Feasibility Study, provides another important issue. This Plan suggests that Mallow should not become a dormitory town for metropolitan Cork. The plan forecasts that this will occur because of the house price increases and the reduction in journey times brought by road improvements. For this reason, the Eastern Oct 2008 Page 5 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

Corridor would provide a better fit with the Cork Area Strategic Plan than the Western one, as it would remove much of the strategic traffic from the existing N20 passing through Mallow, and could promote sustainable development to Mallow, beyond a commuter housing centre. The Mallow Special Local Area Plan, states a preference for the Western Corridor as it improves the town s hub status potential by improving connections to the two named Gateway cities of Cork and Limerick. Other key planning factors highlighted by the Pre-Feasibility Study come from the National Spatial Strategy for Ireland (NSS), with its twenty year planning framework, designed to promote and achieve a better balance of social, economic, physical development and population growth. The National Spatial Strategy defines a system of designated gateways and hubs which are essential in promoting a balanced regional development. In defining Mallow as one of the hubs in southern Ireland, the NSS states that The improvement of physical and other connections between the gateways and hubs, when improved, will ensure that the capabilities and critical mass of the gateways can be used more effectively to the benefit of the gateway itself, the hub and other towns, and related villages and rural areas. With respect to Mallow the following factors are highlighted in the Pre-Feasibility report: - Mallow was one of the fastest growing hubs in the country during the period 2002 2006 (3.7% compared to 2.0% per annum average across the state). - Road connections are seen as vitally important for promoting economic development and reinforcing Mallow s role as a key driver for regional and local development. Obviously adequate roads infrastructure has to be given high priority. The Emerging Atlantic Corridor Route is in line with the proposals to develop the Atlantic Gateway cities of Waterford, Cork, Limerick and Galway and also to facilitate the development of hub towns such as Mallow, Ennis and Tuam. Improving regional connectivity would relieve traffic congestion, which can be a common problem in connections between Gateways and Hubs. The Pre-Feasibility Study also includes an interesting summary of the impacts of each proposed corridor on National Plans, Strategies and Policies. - The Eastern Corridor is not in line with the intentions of The National Spatial Strategy in which it refers to Mallow. - The Western Corridor would be in line with the objective to provide an adequate roads infrastructure between the Gateways of Limerick and Cork and the Hub Town of Mallow. 2.2.2 Traffic factors The traffic section of the pre-feasibility report investigates traffic levels on both corridors, focusing on the potential re-assignments from the existing N20 to the proposed route corridors. The objective is to determine if the eastern corridor is capable of attracting a significant volume of traffic from the existing corridor. The study did not undertake any additional data capture; rather it uses existing information from previous origin destination surveys and data from existing Automatic Traffic Counters. Oct 2008 Page 6 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

Heavy Commercial Vehicle (HCV) traffic is generated along the N20 corridors, from industrial centres in Mallow, Charleville and Mitchelstown. This traffic uses the existing N20 and its connections to N72 and N73. The Western Corridor seems to be more suitable to serve this kind of traffic than Eastern Corridor. The Traffic section of the Pre-Feasibility report included the following : o The study made use of existing traffic data only. Existing data compiled comprised Automatic Traffic Count Data from NRA, Roadside Interview (RSI) Survey data, Manual Classified Counts and NRA estimated counts along the N20 and N8. o RSI data was used to construct trip matrices to summarise traffic demand on the N20, N72, N8 and N24 routes. Data was coded to a system of 21 zones that allows the capture of movements to and from key settlements within the study area. o From this data the study built a likelihood matrix for each corridor option. If a trip is likely to use the corridor a digit 1 is placed, and the same with a figure 0 in the case of not using this corridor. The sum of results from this likelihood matrix is applied to the total volumes for every pair to get the forecast of use of every corridor. In the case that both options are equally likely for a particular trip, a figure 1 is placed in both matrices, indicating that it could be captured by both options. o Traffic volumes along the N20 are shown in the study. Traffic varies from near 25,000 vehicles AADT near Cork, around 17,000 between Cork and Mallow, near 20,000 in Mallow at the N72 intersection, 10,000 to 11,000 between Mallow and Croom, and near 15,000 between Croom and Limerick. Around Limerick volumes are about 25,000. HCV traffic remains relatively constant along the length of the corridor, with a percentage that varies between 7 & 14%; the highest (14%) is between Cork and Mallow. This study concludes that for long distance traffic either corridor option could be used based on similar route distances. This is not the same for short and medium distance traffic movements. In this case the Eastern Corridor would not attract significant volumes of traffic, as it does not pass through any of the key locations of population, industry or employment, such as Mallow, Charleville, Buttevant, Croom, Patrickswell and Blarney. The study also showed that only a relatively small proportion of the existing traffic on the N20 is travelling the full distance between Cork and Limerick or beyond. The analysis done on the N24 also suggested that almost none of this traffic travels beyond Tipperary. To summarise the potential attraction for vehicles from the N20, the study provides a table which indicates that only about 2,100 vehicles would be transferred to the Eastern Corridor, and concludes that the majority of traffic using the existing N20 (Western Corridor) will still use it or an improved version. Oct 2008 Page 7 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

3. New Data Obtained Data Collection The traffic study for the M20 Cork Limerick Motorway Scheme included the collection of traffic data along the N20 corridor. Traffic flow data was obtained through traffic surveys specifically commissioned for the study. There are four NRA permanent counters within the study area which were also used for this contemporary study. A network was modelled for the scheme, the link lengths being taken from OSI maps. A specialist data collection company was appointed to undertake a variety of traffic surveys. Data from all surveys were collected in July 2008. This data was expanded to AADT using NRA published annual data and seasonality indices. The following surveys were used to collect data for the study: Automatic Traffic Counts (temporary sites undertaken for a period of one week each). Manual Classified Junction Turning Counts, for a 12 hour period from 7:00 to 19:00. Roadside Interviews with simultaneous 24 hour automatic traffic counts. ATC were needed to expand the results of the survey to the complete day. ATC data was collected from each site for a minimum of one week in order to enable robust determination of average weekday traffic flows. Counting equipment was checked regularly to ensure it was functioning correctly and that data collection was continuous. Manual junction turning movement counts were conducted on 13 sites along the existing N20. The locations of these ATC and Junction counts are shown on Fig 1 below. All turning movement surveys were undertaken as continuous 12 hour (07:00 19:00) full manual classified counts for each movement from / to each arm of all the junctions selected. Additionally, a 24 hour count was made in Ballyhea to capture night HGV movements. The following vehicle classifications were used: Car Light Goods Vehicles OGV1 (2 and 3 axle rigid) OGV2 (3 axle and more articulated, 4 axle rigid) Buses and coaches Other Oct 2008 Page 8 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

Oct 2008 Page 9 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

FIGURE 1-. LOCATION OF COUNTS Roadside interviews (RSI) were conducted at the following locations: Between Attyflin Junction and Croom. N20 at Ballyhea. Croom High Street Both sides of the O Rourke s Cross on the existing R518 Both sides of Charleville on the existing R515 outside the urban area Both sides of Buttevant on the existing R522 outside the urban area R580 west of Buttevant outside the urban area. N73 East of Mallow. Both sides of Mallow on the existing N72. Old Cork road in Mallow. Oct 2008 Page 10 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

Lissavoura Crossroads Roadside Interviews were conducted in accordance with relevant NRA requirements and in the presence of the Gardai. Classified Traffic Count Surveys were conducted simultaneously with the Roadside Interview, over a 12-hour period between 07:00 and 19:00, corresponding to the period the surveys were undertaken. The total number of vehicles counted at the fifteen RSI sites during the 12 hour surveys was 74,924 with a total of 20,707 roadside interviews completed. This equates to an overall sample rate of 27.64%. The sample rates at the individual sites are shown in Table 1 below: TABLE 1. NUMBER OF INTERVIEWS AND SAMPLE RATE BY RSI SITE Site Total Number Interviews Sample Rate (%) 1 1,702 15,23% 2 1,734 15,55% 3 1,949 14,40% 4 1,512 55,86% 5 1,070 47,37% 6 1,540 54,07% 7 1,874 37,26% 8 2,296 38,41% 9 704 37,15% 10 478 43,34% 11 530 46,90% 12a 764 33,10% 12b 1,158 44,56% 13 1,582 19,01% 14 1,814 62,66% The coded origin / destination survey data taken from the Roadside Interviews allow the creation of a set of matrices per survey site. To allow a unique set of matrices for the complete scheme, expansion from the sampled traffic to the total daily traffic requires a very delicate process of eliminating double counts. Table 2 below provides a brief summary of the existing traffic flows in the study area as indicated by the classified counts undertaken for the study. The results from the ATC counts were converted to AADT, by using the permanent NRA traffic counters located nearest the survey sites. Results are as follows, expressed in terms of AADT for 2008: Oct 2008 Page 11 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

TABLE 2. EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOWS IN THE STUDY AREA LOCATION POINT NORTHBOUND AADT SOUTHBOUND AADT 2-way AADT %HGV LIMERICK TO PATRICKSWELL NRA 2007-17 27,478 9,70% PATRICKSWELL TO CROOM ATC1 7,034 7,077 14,110 8,00% CROOM TO BRUREE ATC15 5,653 5,657 11,311 9,00% NORTH CHARLEVILLE ATC16 6,011 6,012 12,023 8,91% CHARLEVILLE TO BUTTEVANT ATC17 6,347 6,337 12,684 8,78% CHARLEVILLE TO BUTTEVANT ATC2 5,964 5,777 11,742 7,58% NORTH BUTTEVANT ATC18 5,523 5,279 10,803 8,50% SOUTH BUTTEVANT ATC19 5,842 6,010 11,852 8,10% NORTH MALLOW JUNCTION N73 J6N 9,420 10,368 19,788 11,49% SOUTH MALLOW JUNCTION N73 J6S 8,431 8,656 17,086 11,66% SOUTH MALLOW ATC3 8,515 9,587 18,102 7,17% MALLOW TO BLARNEY ATC20 9,306 9,431 18,737 5,65% BLARNEY TO CORK NRA 2008-04 11,808 11,808 23,616 7,00% The traffic count surveys show that daily traffic volumes of approximately 18,000 vehicles use the N20 between Mallow and Cork, reducing to around 10,000 to 12,000 between Mallow and Croom, and increasing to 14,000 vehicles north of Croom. Proportions of HGV are reasonably consistently at around 8 to 11% along the entire corridor. Oct 2008 Page 12 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

4. Discussion The Road Side Interviews achieved good sample rates. Results can be taken as being representative of traffic behaviour along the corridor, in particular in identifying long and short distance trip proportions. Three of the RSI sites were placed on the main section of the N20. These were: o o o Site 1 (ATC1 on the map), between Croom and Patrickswell. Site 2 (ATC2 on the map), between Charleville and Buttevant. Site 3 (ATC3 on the map), south of Mallow. Results, in terms of AADT, are shown below. It should be noted that some O-D traffic results can vary between RSI sites. This is because the surveys are based on a sample rate and expanded; however, the resultant data for each O-D pair are in the same order. This Data collected provided relevant information about the corridor selection in the pre-feasibility report that reinforces the recommended Western Corridor: All the following data refers to year 2008. TABLE 3. O D RESULTS IN SITE 1 (BETWEEN CROOM & PATRICKSWELL) Trip AADT flow CORK-LIMERICK 1,978 CROOM-LIMERICK 1,742 CHARLEVILLE-LIMERICK 1,703 CORK-NORTH 1,224 R515 EAST-LIMERICK 572 CROOM-NORTH 439 MALLOW-LIMERICK 430 CROOM-PATRICKSWELL 276 CORK-N-7 250 CROOM-WEST LIMERICK 232 CHARLEVILLE-NORTH 228 MALLOW-NORTH 194 BUTTEVANT-LIMERICK 138 CORK-NORTH LIMERICK 135 CORK-ROUND LIMERICK 38 CORK-N-21 WEST 36 Others 4,495 Total Traffic (ATC 1) 14,110 Long Distance AADT 3.662 Long Distance proportion 25.95% Oct 2008 Page 13 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

Long distance traffic, as the sum of traffic from Cork to the northern end of the existing N20, is 3,662 vehicles per day (Cork to Limerick and Cork to Beyond Limerick). The pre-feasibility traffic section reported 2,100 vehicles which compares well to the Cork to Limerick flows (1,978 to 2,100) vehicles. In this particular point, long distance rate is about 26%, which means that short and medium trips represents 74%. This traffic, 10,448 vehicles per day, would be still running along the existing N20 if the Eastern Corridor had been selected. TABLE 4. O D RESULTS IN SITE 2 (BETWEEN BUTTEVANT & CHARLEVILLE) Trip AADT flow CORK-LIMERICK 1,851 CORK-NORTH 1,727 BUTTEVANT-CHARLEVILLE 1,105 MALLOW-CHARLEVILLE 1,039 CORK-CHARLEVILLE 1,004 MALLOW-LIMERICK 626 R-522 EAST - CHARLEVILLE 510 MALLOW-NORTH 245 BUTTEVANT-LIMERICK 172 CHARLEVILLE-CHARLEVILLE 188 CORK-N-21 WEST 190 R515 WEST-CHARLEVILLE 159 MALLOW-N-21 WEST 152 CORK-NORTH LIMERICK 59 CORK-PATRICKSWELL 23 Others 2,692 Total Traffic (ATC 2) 11,742 Long Distance AADT 3,849 Long Distance proportion 32.78% Long distance proportion in this site is 32.78%, so therefore approximately 67% of trips are short distance and will remain in the N20 corridor. Long distance increases to 3,849 vehicles (about 5% higher than in site 1), and the traffic that would be not removed from N20 if the Eastern corridor was chosen would be approximately 7,900 vehicles per day. Oct 2008 Page 14 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

TABLE 5. O D RESULTS IN SITE 3 (SOUTH MALLOW) Trip AADT flow CORK-MALLOW 5,551 CORK-LIMERICK 2,378 CORK-NORTH 1,196 CORK-CHARLEVILLE 1,091 CORK-R-522 EAST/N-73 668 CORK-BUTTEVANT 647 N-72 WEST-MALLOW 451 MALLOW-MALLOW 410 CORK-R515 WEST 357 BALLYNAMONA-MALLOW 340 GRENAGH-MALLOW 315 KINSALE-MALLOW 310 BLARNEY-MALLOW 268 CORK-EXT N-21 WEST 213 CORK-R580 WEST 143 CORK-N-72 WEST 113 CORK-NORTH LIMERICK 94 CORK-R-516 EAST 91 CORK-CROOM 52 CORK-N72 EAST 52 CORK-N-24 29 CORK-WEST LIMERICK 21 Others 3,315 Total Traffic (ATC 3) 18,101 Long Distance AADT 3,881 Long Distance proportion 21.44% In the site 3, south of Mallow, long distance traffic is still in the same order as the other sites, with 3,881 vehicles per day. This represents 21.4% percent of the total AADT, and the number of vehicles that could not be captured by the Eastern Corridor would be approximately 14,000 vehicles per day. Oct 2008 Page 15 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

The following map shows the desire lines from the complete set of Origin and Destination zones. The width of the line increases as the number of trips increases. FIGURE 2. DESIRE LINES This figure only represents flows higher than 150 vehicles. The map does not represent traffic assignments, but only direct desire lines. It can be seen that although long distance traffic are represented, the majority of trips are short distance. Oct 2008 Page 16 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility

5. Conclusions The additional information gathered as part of traffic study for the M20 scheme reinforces the recommendations of the Pre-Feasibility Study in the following aspects: - Strategic Long distance trips along the N20 route are between 20 to 30% of total flows. Therefore remaining flows consisting of a minimum of around 8,000 vehicles and a maximum of 14,000 vehicles that would not be captured by a potential Eastern Corridor. - Local and Commuter trips are very significant along the N20 route. In particular, traffic from Mallow to Cork is very important, reaching volumes above 8,000 vehicles per day (adding flows not only between these two main cities but traffic that is generated by intermediate zones inside that section). This volume would not be captured by the Eastern Corridor. - The Western Corridor option still provides for the strategic long distance trips and provides a necessary upgrade to the existing N20 route to cater for significant traffic flows into the future. We conclude that the recommendations of the Pre-Feasibility Report were correct and the Western Corridor should be pursued as the route for the Atlantic Corridor. Oct 2008 Page 17 of 17 Cork to Limerick Route Pre-Feasibility