Schedule 1, Part 4 Local Infrastructure - Transportation

Schedule 1, Part 4 Local Infrastructure - Transportation

Schedule 1 -Part 4 Local Infrastructure - Transportation Contents 1. Introduction 21 1.1 Local Transportation 21 2. Design Paraeters 211 2.1 Carriageway Widths 211 2.2 Traffic Generation 212 3. Basis for Costing 212 3.1 Paraeters for Cost Estiates 212 3.2 Cost Sharing for Carriageways Over 8 Wide 213 3.3 Other Wori<s 213 4. Bethlehe 214 5. West Bethlehe 221 6. Pyes Pa 223 7. Pyes Pa West 225 8. Ohauiti 229 9. Welcoe Bay 23 1. Papaoa 231 11. Wairakei 235 12. Tauriko Business Estate 238 Developent Contributions Policy Page 29

Transportation 1. Introduction The transportation network is an essential coponent of the physical environent. Its aintenance is necessary, not only to protect the resource in its own right, but is essential if the counity is to be able to provide for its social and econoic well-being. Therefore, planning of the roads ust ensure a safe and efficient syste of oving people and goods about the district. This is achieved by ensuring correct carriageway widths are allowed for now to cater for the predicted traffic densities of the future and the alignents are located so that the ost efficient network can be achieved, while all the tie addressing safety issues. The structure plans and developent contribution syste is designed to ensure that each growth area is provided with the trunk services that are required to service the ultiate developent of the area and that the developer pays a fair share of the cost of this work. In the case of transportation, the trunk services are the arterial, collector and sub-collector roads as defined in Council's City Plan and Infrastructure Developent Code. In addition to the streets listed within the Urban Growth Areas, the status of a nuber of peripheral streets identified in the roading hierarchy as arterials and collectors will require to be iproved and widened to accoodate the increased traffic generated as a result of urban growth. 1.1 Local Transportation Funding Needs Assessent in Relation to the Requireents of SI 1 (3) ofthe LGA. Scope of Projects Covered by this Activity The projects funded by Tauranga City Council (TCC) through transportation local developent contributions are those projects that will priarily be used by residents within that growth area as connector and arterial roads within that area. Projects that relate to providing road access to individual households are norally copleted by individual developers and given (vested) to TCC. Any other assets (such as walkways) will be funded based on the benefits received. Council Outcoes The provision of access to the transportation network within a growth area contributes to all of the Council Outcoes, and the following City Vision Stateents; Easy to Move Around Vibrant Healthy and Diverse Counities Built to Fit Our Hills Harbour and Coast Strong Sustainable Econoy Living Well Wasting Less These projects are also iportant in ipleenting Western Bay of Plenty's growth anageent strategy, Sartgrowth. Distribution of Benefits The principal benefit of these projects is that they extend the transportation network and allow local residents to gain access to (and be accessed fro) the wider transportation network. For non priary arterial roads this benefit is conferred on new households and businesses in the growth areas. Households and businesses located outside the growth areas gain a relatively inor benefit in being able to access properties located in the grov\/th areas. However, given the restricted geographic nature of ost of these capital works and the connectedness of those households and businesses to an existing network, Council believes that any ipact on geographic areas beyond the individual growth areas is likely to be neutral or inor. Projects that relate to priary arterial roads will be exained using Council's traffic odelling software. This software will be used to assess what vehicles are likely to use the roads and how often. The costs of this road will then be apportioned according to the distribution of road usage. The proportion of road usage by existing residents will be funded fro rates. The cost of replacing any Page 21 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation portion of the road that already exists will also be paid for by existing ratepayers. The proportion of road usage by new residents will be funded fro Developent Contributions. For ost growth areas there was (or will be) an existing population (norally with a significantly lower housing density) before the growth area was opened up for intensification. These existing properties already had/will have a transportation network in place. Therefore the benefits to existing residents within these growth areas is assessed as low. The only benefit identified is a short-ter reduction in congestion, but in the long ter expected to be neutral. Given that, at the local road coponent level, the road widening will not actually create an extra lane. The actual ipact on congestion will not be significant. Also given that the upgrading to the roading will generally be done in sections as the growth area is developed the benefit would be relatively short lived, aybe only two to three years. The replaceent portion of any existing roading upgrade will be paid for by the existing ratepayers. On this basis we consider that projects funded by the transportation local developent contribution provide no significant benefit to the existing population in growth areas. Period In or Over which Benefits Occur The capital projects included are designed to ensure that all units of deand within the growth area are able to connect to Council's transportation network. We have therefore assessed the period over which the benefits will be received is the developent period of the urban growth area, fro when the growth area is first opened up until it is full (to the axiu allowed density). The divisor used in our calculations is the expected nuber of new lots over this period. Extent to Which Groups or Individuals Contribute to the Need to Undertake the Activity The group that creates the need for these works is residential and non-residential growth (i.e. new households and businesses) in the specified growth areas. Developent contributions allocate the cost of these works to that growth counity. Costs and Benefits of Funding the Activity Distinctly fro Other Activities Given the benefits and causation factors outlined above, it is considered appropriate (in particular for transparency and accountability reasons) for these works to be funded through this particular contribution, rather than the citywide developent contribution or other funding sources such as rates or a Unifor Annual General Charge. Given the low nature of the ipact and the relatively short duration of the benefit, we do not believe that collecting funds fro existing ratepayers in a growth area, such as through a targeted rate, to be an efficient process, or justified in the circustances. Social, Econoic, Environental and Cultural Well-being Council has considered the ipact, for all sectors of the counity, including the growth counity which pays developent contributions, of the proposed allocation of costs in ters of their social, econoic, environental and cultural well-being. It considers this allocation of costs to be fair and reasonable. The allocation details for this activity are clearly set out in this section. 2. Design Paraeters 2.1 Carriageway Widths The following paraeters have been used for the developent of the Urban Grov\/th Area structure plans and are taken fro Council's Infrastructure Developent Code. Road Type Secondary Arterial Collector Local Coercial Industrial Indicative Traffic Volue (VPD) 7,->15, 3,->15, <3,5 Varies Varies Carriageway width 12 plus 1 plus 3-1 Varies Varies Developent Contributions Policy Page 211

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation 2.2 Traffic Generation Residential Coercial/Industrial 1 vehicle trips per day per dwelling unit. Specific design based on the Road Traffic Authority of NSW "Guide to Traffic Generating Developents". ; the Transfund research report No. 29 "Trips and Parking Related to Land Use" (TRR29); and the Institution of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation ("ITE Guide"). Data sourced in New Zealand, Australia and United States is adopted in that order of preference dependant on the availability of relevant data. 3. Basis for Costing 3.1 Paraeters for Cost Estiates Unit Rates for various aspects of the construction works have been deterined fro recent Council contract rates. In soe instances substantial earthworks will be required and this has been independently assessed and built into the estiate. These rates are reviewed annually. The rates are suarised as follows; Infrastructure: Kerb and channel (per side) Sups (two @ 15 ea/7 spacing) Concrete footpaths, 1.4 wide (per side) Earthworks: Strip topsoil and stockpile Cut to fill Cut to waste Iport fill Undercut soft aterial Tri and copact subgrade Respread topsoil and sow in grass Paveent: Basecourse (supply and copact) Basecourse overlay (1 x 4 depth) 1st coat seal 2nd coat seal Asphalt / concrete (3 thick) Road arkings Miscellaneous: Street lighting @ 5 spacing (standard) Street lighting - inor road Street lighting - ajor road Preliinary and general Records and reporting Environental works Traffic anageent areas, incl signs and associated infrastructure Contingency Consultancy and adinistration fees Single lane roundabout 24 dia roundabout Traffic lights 46. 43. 62. 12.5 12.5 18. 16.5 15.5 2. 6. 115. 34. 6. 5.5 27. 1.1% 65. 85. 125. 3.% 1.% 1.5% 1.% 2.% 1.% 63, 19, 37, Cost perl per per per^ per^ per^ per ^ per ^ per ^ per^ per^ per per ^ per^ per^ per per per each each each Page 212 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 3.2 Cost Sharing for Carriageways Over 8 Wide In the case where the structure plan shows a requireent for a road over eight etres wide, and that road benefits other land outside the subdivision, the Local Developent Contributions are designed to recopense the developer for the extra road width. A coparison of construction costs for carriageway widths has shown that the relationship between an eight, ten, twelve and fifteen etre carriageway is; Road Width (M) 8 1 11 12 15 Cost C/W 8 Carriageway 1 1.8 1.22 1.6 2.3 Reiburseent Rate Nil 15% 18% 37% 51% 3.3 Other Works In addition to quantified iproveents in the widths and lengths of road, the consequences of urban growth can also extend to the requireent for the provision and iproveents of traffic control easures to anage the increased traffic volues. These easures range fro intersection controls based on signals, roundabouts or grade-separated facilities, to traffic caling easures designed to anage the consequences of increased traffic speeds resulting fro "add-on" sequential growth. These consequences ay also require the provision of pedestrian facilities, particularly where residential suburbs are reote fro counity services. Developent Contributions Policy Page 213

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation 4. Bethlehe The whole length of Bethlehe Rd and the north-east portion of Carichael Rd (fro Bethlehe Rd) needs upgrading to cope with the design traffic flows. The section of Carichael Rd fro SH2 to Bethlehe Rd has been included within the West Bethlehe Local Developent Contributions. There will be soe increase in traffic on the road but the developent of the proposed coercial centre will have a far ore draatic effect. These traffic ipacts are require to be addressed strictly by that developent. A new road fro the northern end of Mayfield Lane across the low-lying far land to link with Millers Rd is also included, along with the upgrading of Millers Rd and its intersection with Bellevue Rd. This is seen as an essential link to provide an alternative access to the north Bethlehe area rather than placing sole reliance on SH2. It is not seen as desirable to aintain the access fro Mayfield Lane on to SH2 so allowance has been ade to close this off, with access being provided fro a new road off Carichael Rd and the link road fro Millers Rd. Soe of the cost of this extension is included within the ipact fees as there are sections of it which will have no direct benefit to any one developer. This extension is also planned to carry on fro Carichael Rd to eet the end of Bethlehe Rd. The portion of the cost of new or upgraded roads that is attributable to new growth ust be assessed for each section of road to ensure that the contribution fee is fair and reasonable. This has been done using the ratio of existing dwelling units to predicted dwelling units on each road, except for the first portion of Bethlehe Rd adjacent to the proposed coercial developent. In this case the ratio of predicted traffic fro the coercial operation to the predicted traffic fro residential developent was used. Page 214 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 4 BETHLEHEM 4.1 Cabridge Rd (Moffat Rd intersection north) - 1.6k Existing foration: 6.7 and 8 wide seal, no kerb, channel or footpath. Proposed upgrade: (a) Realign corners, widen to 1, no kerb and channel, footpath one side (b) Widen fro 1 to 12, kerb, channel, footpath (a) Widen and realign (LIPS 28225) (b) Widen, kerb and channel, footpath (LIPS 142) 5 924 379,47 462, 841,47 4.2 Cabridge Rd (Moffat Rd intersection south) - 2.22k (LIPS 2829) Existing foration: 8.4 wide seal, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 1, realign corners, no kerb, channel, safety footpath and in lighting Widen and realign corners 2,22 776,894 776,894 4.3 Moffat Rd-2.1k (LIPS 283) Existing foration: First 65 is 12 wide seal, kerb and channel. Rest is 8 wide seal, no kerb, channel or footpath Proposed upgrade: 15 wide kerb and channel, footpath (a) Widen fro 12 to 15. kerb and channel 1.3 (b) Widen fro 8 to 15. kerb and channel 1.7 384,719 559,44 943,763 4.4 Road Widening.- Land Purchase (LIPS 2831) Moffat Road (2.5 either side) Rural zone Residential zone.5.5 ha ha 275, 1.. Survey and Negotiation 7.5% 1,275, 95,625 1,37,625 Cabridge Road (2.5 on the western side) (LIPS 2832).35 ha 192.5 192.5 Survey and Negotiation 7.5% 14,438 26,938 Developent Contributions Policy Page 215

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 4.5 Orange Lane -.465k (LIPS 2833) Existing foration: 5.4 seal, no shoulder or footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 1, kerb, channel and footpaths 465 126,924 126,924 4.6 Beauaris Boulevard-.16k (LIPS 145) Existing foration: None Proposed upgrade: 9 wide carriageway with urban infrastructure, incl kerb and channel Consents and Legal Fees (LIPS 28273) Land Purchase (LIPS 28273) 294 3,166,79 177,35 223,996 3,567,38 4.7 Bethlehe Road (SH2 to Carichael Rd) -.7k (LIPS 2834) Existing foration: 6.2 wide seal, l wide shoulder, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: (a) Widen fro 6.2 to 1, no kerb, footpath on one side (b) Widen fro 1 to 12, kerb, channel, footpath, plus 22-wide road reserve (a) Widen, footpath (b) Widen, kerb, channel, footpath 23 47 167,647 54,624 672,271 Cosf sharing: -47 Traffic fro coercial developent Predicted flow fro rezoned area 8, 4,6 vpd vpd 12,6 vpd Traffic %age due to rezoning 47-7 Existing lots Lots after rezoning 37% 58 37 428 Traffic %age due to rezoning 86% 4.8(a) Bethlehe Rd (Carichael Rd to Marae) -.4k (LIPS 163) Existing foration: 6.2 wide seal, no shoulder, no footpath Proposed upgrade: (a) Widen fro 6.2 to 12, kerb, channel and footpath (a) Road widening, kerb, channel and footpath 4 842,855 Cost sharing: 7-15 Existing lots Lots after rezoning 58 37 14 % 86% Page 216 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost Traffic %age due to rezoning This 86 % is split 66 % Bethlehe and 2 % West Bethlehe. 428 1 % 86% 4.8 Bethlehe Rd (Carichael Rd to Marae) -.51k (LIPS 2247) (b) Road widening, kerb, channel and footpath 51 (c) Renewals (d) Roundabout 24 Dia M 1,154 415 588,54 211,65 19, 99,19 b) Road widening 51 North East Bethlehe West Bethlehe Renewal 43% 43% 14% 1% 4.8.1 Bethlehe Road (Marae for -.61k) (LIPS 164) Existing foration: 6.2 wide seal, no kerb, channel, footpath; 16 wide road reserve Proposed upgrade: Local Road 8 wide with kerb and channel and footpath both sides Widening Land Purchase (including negotiation and price contingency) ney) Renewal 61.346 61 ha @ @ 825 239 53.25 588,86 145,79 1,237,126 Cosf sharing: Existing lots Lots after rezoning 48 229 17% 83% 277 1% Traffic %age due to rezoning 83% 965,16 76% 9 65 1 6 4.8.2 Bethlehe Road (To the end-.15k) (LIPS 165) Existing foration: 5.2 seal, no kerb, channel, footpath; 16 wide road reserve Proposed upgrade: Local road standard, 8 carriageway, kerb, footpath, street lighting, etc Widening 15 Renewal Cosf sharing: Existing lots Lots after rezoning Traffic %age due to rezoning 48 229 277 83% @ 97 211 136,5 31,65 167,7 4.8.3 Carichael Rd (Bethlehe to end) -.48k (LIPS 28263) Existing foration; Developent Contributions Policy Page 217

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 5.6 seal, no kerb, channel, footpath. Proposed upgrade: Collector standard, 12 carriageway, kerbing, footpath, street lights, etc Widening 48 454,88 Cost sharing: Existing lots Lots after rezoning Traffic %age due to rezoning 14 37 384 96% 4.8.4 Mayfield Lane (Northern end towards S H 2) -.375k (LIPS 175) Existing foration: 5.5 unsealed, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed foration: Local road standard, 8 carriageway, kerb, footpath, (one side only) street lights, etc Note: not connected to S H 2) Widening 12 31,279 Cosf sharing: Existing lots Lots after rezoning Traffic %age due to rezoning 3 33 36 92% 4.8.5 Millers Rd (Bellevue to end) -.39k (LIPS 28274) Existing foration: 8 seal, kerb, channel, soe footpaths, street lighting Proposed upgrading: Collector standard. 12 carriageway, kerb, footpath, street lights, etc Widening Cost sharing: Totally as a result of developent 39 63% 767,456 4.8.6 Millers Rd (Unfored Section) - 39-93 (LIPS 2835) Existing foration: No foration. Deep gully and wet floodplain Proposed upgrading: Collector standard, 12 carriageway, kerb, footpath, street lights, etc Widening Cost sharing: 39-62 62-645 & 95-93 These areas could have been sections in the Parkvale subdivision, and are therefore a full cost on the area 645-95 The area developent pays for the widening fro a 8 carriageway to 12 54 23 5 26 @ @ 33% 1% 37% 615,785 4.8.7 Millers Rd (Extension to Mayfield Lane) - 93-122 Page 218 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost Existing foration: No foration; crosses wet floodplain paddocks Proposed upgrading: Collector standard,12 carriageway, kerb, footpath, street lights, etc Earthworks (LIPS 28226) Construction (LIPS 177) 3 Cosf sharing: Totally as a result of developent 1% 4.8.8 Bethlehe / Carichael Intersection Upgrade (LIPS 28258) Existing foration: on grade intersection at: Bethlehe Rd/Carichael Rd Proposed upgrading: Construct roundabout Roundabout 1 Cosf sharing: The growth share ofthis intersection is 86 %. Ofthis West Bethlehe's share is 46 % and NE Bethlehe's share is 4 % (see 5.5) 3,764 855,85 1,156,569 53,881 4.8.9 Mayfield Lane to Carichael Rd (new road) - 1.45k Existing foration: Nil Proposed upgrading: Collector standard. 12 carriageway, kerb, footpath, street lights, etc Construction (LIPS 28278) (LIPS 227) Cost sharing: -545: One side ofthis road fronts undevelopable land, therefore half the cost should be paid by area developent 545-775: No one developer gains fro constructing this portion of the road therefore the total costs should be borne by the area, ie 775-1,45: Developers benefit fro both sides of this road, however the difference in cost between a 9 foration and a 12 12 foration should be borne by the area. 815 23 5% 1 % Meters 545 23 33% 27 665,54 238,931 94,471 4.8.1 Carichael Rd Extension -.24k (LIPS 228) REMOVED 4.8.11 Walkways (LIPS 229) Existing foration: Nil Proposed upgrading: 2.5 foration with a 1.4 concrete footpath Westwood Dr / Carichael Rd - 1,5 Construction Contingencies Design and supervision Mayfield Lane extension / Bethlehe Rd - 97 Construction 15 97 75 1% 7.5% 112,5 11,25 9,281 133,31 75 72,75 Developent Contributions Policy Page 219

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation Contingencies @ 1% 7,275 Design and supervision @ 7.5% 6,2 86,27 219,58 Total Cost of Walkways Cost sharing: Due to the shared benefit of the walkways between the rezoned areas and the district, the costs have been shared on the sae basis as the sub-district reserves 57% 4.9 Paveent Widening (LIPS 2836) Mayfield Subdivision, access (8-11) 18 % share 565 431,8 Land Purchase (15 X 3-rural zone land).31 ha 1,85 442,65 TRANSPORTATION UPGRADE COST FOR BETHLEHEM AREA 16,881,463 Page 22 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 5. West Bethlehe A new collector road links the roundabout with Carichael Rd, Carichael Rd requires upgrading to subdivision standard and is to be closed to arterial traffic at the SH 2 intersection. Cost sharing of the Carichael Rd/Bethlehe Rd roundabout is required including a l widening of a section of Bethlehe Rd. 5. WEST BETHLEHEM Qty 1 Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 5.1 New roundabout on S H 2 (LIPS 23) Land purchase splays Land Area A Land purchase splays Land Area B Roundabout construct Extend services both sides of roundabout.6.4 1 2 @ @ @ 1,5, Eng. Est 5, 1,13,76 6, 1,887,516 1. 3,6,592 Cost sharing: Other funding sources Cost for West Bethlehe developent 1,887,516 49.% 51.% 5.2 Carichael Rd - Bethlehe Rd to S H 2 (LIPS 235) Existing foration: 5.2 wide seal, no kerb, channel, footpath on one side Proposed upgrade: (a) Widen to 12, kerb and channel and footpath (b) Widen to 8, kerb and channel and footpath (a) 12, kerb and channel, footpath 4 473,28 (b) 8, kerb and channel, footpath (c) Renewal 36 36 86 77 29,16 254,52 1,17,96 Cost shanng: Existing lots West Bethlehe 81 Lots after rezoning 442 523 Traffic % due to rezoning 85% 5.3 Bethlehe Rd Widening (LIPS 163) Existing foration: 6.2 wide seal, kerb and channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: 11 wide seal, kerb and channel 51 842,855 842,855 5.4 Bethlehe / Carichael Intersection Upgrade (LIPS 28258) Existing foration: on grade intersection at Bethlehe RD/Carichael Rd Proposed upgrading: Construct roundabout at intersection 53,881 5.5 Designation process for roads in Bethlehe Plan Change 15 (LIPS 28275) Designation costs L.S 2,113 2,113 Developent Contributions Policy Page 221

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation 5.6 Signalised Pedestrian crossing on SH 2 (LIPS 237) Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 1 @ 2, 5.7 Bethlehe Road (Carichael Rd to Marae)-.51k (LIPS 2247) (b) Road widening, kerb, channel and footpath 51 1,154 588,54 (c) Renewals 51 415 211,65 d) Roundabout 24 Dia 19, 99,19 ROADING UPGRADE COST FOR WEST BETHLEHEM 6,957,591 Page 222 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 6. Pyes Pa Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 6. Pyes Pa 6.1 Cheyne Rd - 2.94k (LIPS 28259) Existing foration: Mixture of rehabilitated chip seal 7.5 wide, new construction and 4 wide etal ski Proposed upgrade: Reconstruct to 11 wide, two-coat seal, kerb, channel, footpaths (a) Widen 7.5 to 11, kerb, channel, footpaths (b) Pyes Pa Rd intersection (c) New subdivisional road (d) Widen fro 4 (etal foration) to 11, kerb, channel, footpath 46 1,17 1,11 249 161,38 17,893 191,349 1,341,546 199,442 1,911,268 6.2 Pyes Pa Rd - 2.25k Existing foration: (a) 8.8 seal, kerb, channel, one footpath (b) 6.8 seal, no kerb, channel or footpath (c) 9.8 seal, recently upgraded, no kerb or footpath Proposed upgrade; (a) Pedestrian underpass (b) Widen fro 8.8 to 15. kerb, channel, footpath (a) Widen fro 8.8 to 15 (LIPS 2826) (b) Widen fro 6.8 to 15 (LIPS 2826) (c) Widen fro 9.8 to 15, kerb, channel footpath (LIPS 2826) (d) Widen fro 9.8 to 15 (LIPS 1167) Underpass (LIPS 2826) 5 7 173 15 3 @ 1,165 633,839 61,982 1,275.77 99,15 349.5 263.7 53,223,23 Land Purchase (LIPS 28261) Residential Lots Large Block Residential Rural Residential Coercial 647 1,75 49 34 ^ ^ ^ ^ 67,935 61,3 7,4 11,9 Survey and Negotiation Injurious affection 148,535 11,1 29,7 189,335 Total 3,412,538 6.3 Unfored Road (LIPS 44) (Pyes Pa Rd collector to Cheyne Rd) Construct to an 11 wide foration (LIPS 28227) Construct to an 11 wide foration (LIPS 28227) (Payent for extra widening only -18%) 96 96.5 @ 664,294 16,867 771,161 Construct 11 wide foration (LIPS 44) Construct 11 wide foration (LIPS 44) 23 Actual Cost Actual Cost 14,64 85,13 Developent Contributions Policy Page 223

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation Construct to an 11 wide foration 45 @ 15,34 (Payent for extra widening 18% only shown) 24,687 TRANSPORTATION UPGRADE COST FOR PYES PA AREA 6,299,654 Page 224 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 7. Pyes Pa West The Local Developent Contribution syste for the Pyes Pa West Urban Growth area is designed to ensure that the cost of providing services to new developent in the Urban Growth area is allocated equitably to that developent. In the case of Transportation the trunk services are the non-local roads defined in Council's City Plan and Infrastructure Developent Code and shown on the Structure Plan for the Urban Growth Area. Cost Sharing for Carriageways Over 8 Wide In the case where the Structure Plan shows a requireent for a road over eight etres wide, and that road benefits other land outside the subdivision, the Local developent Contributions are designed to recopense the developer for the extra width. Route K Extension (New Arterial) The total construction cost is being shared by TCC, Transit New Zealand, developent in the Pyes Pa West Urban Growth Area and Tauriko Business Estate. The costs for the first 4 - stage 1, of the arterial (Strategic Arterial Road) is apportioned equally between the Tauriko Business Estate area west of the Kopurererua Strea and residential developent in the Pyes Pa West Urban Growth Area. This provides for the length of road as a twolane highway to the first roundabout, which is sufficient to serve the needs of the developent area. The design will accoodate any future grade separation of the Route K Extension/SH 29 intersection if required. Upgrading of Existing Roads Traffic odelling indicates that Pyes Pa Rd fro the creatoriu to Kennedy Rd is likely to experience a drop in traffic nubers as a result of the construction of Route K Extension. There is therefore no requireent for this portion of Pyes Pa Rd to be upgraded as a cost to the UGA. Fro Kennedy Rd to Joyce Rd at the District Boundary (36), Pyes Pa Rd needs to be upgraded as a consequence of the developent of the UGA and this cost is allocated to the UGA including an intersection upgrade at Kennedy Rd and pedestrian crossing facilities. Other road upgrades required are; Kennedy Rd Hastings Rd Pedestrian Access Over Route K Two overbridges and one underpass are required to provide access across Route K Extension and are fully local developent contribution funded, with a portion allocated to Tauriko Business Estate. Developent Contributions Policy Page 225

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 7. Pyes Pa West 7.1 Pyes Pa Rd Upgrade (36) (LIPS 45) Existing foration: 9.8 seal, no kerbing, channel Proposed upgrade: District arterial standard, 13 carriageway, intersection widening, kerb, channel, footpath one side, street lighting and pedestrian crossing (a) Widen 9.8 to 13, kerb, channel, footpath 36 @ 1,937 697,32 697,32 7.2 Kennedy Rd Upgrade (LIPS 56) Existing foration: - 6 6 seal, no kerb, channel or footpath Proposed upgrade: Collector standard 9 carriageway, widening and bank protection, kerb and channel, footpath on one side, street lighting, safety barriers Widen fro 6 to 9 6 @ 1,479 887,4 Existing foration: 6-13 6 seal, no kerb, channel or footpath Proposed upgrade: Collector standard 12 carriageway, widening and high level access, bank protection, kerb and channel, footpaths, street lighting Reconstruct to 12 kerb and channel Renewal Coponent 43 1,3 @ @ 2,123 253 912.89 26,59 1,173,48 Land Purchase Land Purchase 1,7 3 ^ ^ 116,522 16, 132,522 Contingency and Negotiation costs 31,954 164,476 2,225,356 7.3 Hastings Rd Upgrade (LIPS 59) Existing foration: 4.1 average seal, no kerb and channel or footpath Proposed upgrade: Local standard, 8 carriageway, kerb and channel. 15 @ 1,35 155.25 Footpath one side, street lighting Renewal Coponent 15 @ 225 33,75 Cost sharing: Existing dwellings 41 Future dwellings 2,885 Total dwellings 2,926 Page 226 Developent Contributions Policy 189,

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost Traffic % due to rezoning 98.6% 7.4 Lakes Boulevard (25) unfored (LIPS 26262) Construct to 12 wide carriageway (Payent for extra widening only = 37% 35 428,4 428,4 7.4(a) Lakes Boulevard - Underpass (LIPS 28326) Underpass: 3 of 3 x 2.4 box culvert al cost 437,597 437,597 7.5(a) South Collector (145)-unfored (LIPS 1684) Construct to 12 wide carriageway (Payent for extra widening only = 37% 93 2,37 1,894,41 1,894,41 7.5(b) South Collector (145)-unfored (LIPS 2378) Construct to 12 wide carriageway 52 2,37 1,59.24 1,59,24 7.5 Kennedy Road - South Collector Roundabout (LIPS 2641) Roundabout 63, 63, 7.6 Kennedy Rd Extension (9) - unfored (LIPS 28325) Construct to 12 wide carriageway (LIPS 28325) 6 Construct to 12 wide carriageway (LIPS 1685) 3 (Payent for extra widening only = 37% 2, 1,394,899 6, 1,994,899 7.7 Land Cost Cost of land required to connect transportation network to adjacent properties (a) 1 lot at 8^ (LIPS 2379) 8 ^ @ (b) 3 lots at 8^ (1% SIF funded) (LIPS 63) 2,4 ' 223 85,2 223 534,312 619,512 7.8 Capital Contribution to Route K Southern Extension to Pyes Pa Rd SH 36 (LIPS 28264) Cost sharing for this new strategic arterial road has been agreed between Transit, TCC, WBOPDC and Grasshopper: Less non-slf funded portion Portion to be SIF funded 54,354, - 47,754, 6,6, Pyes Pa West Residential Share =3,3, / 54,354, Tauriko Business Estate Share =3,3, / 54,354, Note: Cobined SP 13 an SP14 share reduced by 1,1, (Transit funded land purchase cost in bypass agreeent) 6.7% 6.7% 3,3, 3,3. 7.9 Overpasses/Underpasses - Route K Ext. Overbridge: (LIPS 12) 3 wide x 3 plus 7 rap either end (1,3 per ^ excluding raps) 663, 1,326, Developent Contributions Policy Page 227

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost Underpass: (LIPS 28324) 5 of 3 x 2.4 box culvert (15, per etre) 1 Actual Cost 75, 2,76, Cost sharing: Costs need to be shared between Residential and Business zones based on the nuber of equivalent lots. The cost sharing is as follows: Residential lots (Total) 3,4 Business HUEs (19.7Ha x 15 lots/ha) 296 Total lots 3,3 Residential share (Pyes Pa West) = 34/33 @ 91.3% 1,889,789 Business share (Tauriko) = 296/33 @ 8.97% 186,211 7.1 Noise wall (LIPS 2397) Noise wall 449,23 449,13 TRANSPORTATION UPGRADE COST FOR PYES PA WEST 16,,964 Page 228 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 8. Ohauiti Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 8.1 Poike Rd-1.4k (LIPS 2837) Existing foration: 6 seal, no kerb, channel, footpaths Proposed upgrade: Widen to 12, kerb, channel, footpath Widen to 12, kerb, channel, footpath 1,4 Less Transit New Zealand funding 734,178 ( 5.) 684,178 8.2 Hollister Lane -.57k (LIPS 2838) Existing foration: 4.8 seal, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 11, kerb, channel, footpath on both sides. (a) Widen fro 4.8 to 11, kerb, channel, footpath 57 on both sides. 375.223 375,223 8.3 Ohauiti Rd (fro Taylor St)-1.945k (LIPS 13) Existing foration: 5.8 seal, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 12, kerb, channel, footpaths, with corner iproveents a) Widen to 12, kerb, channel, footpaths (1st stage) (LIPS 28228) b) Boscabel to City Boundary. 12 wide. Corner iproveents 1,3 2 jal cost 1,72 752,419 214,4 1, 1,66,819 8.4 Hollister Lane Extension (1.4K.) Costing allows for payent for the extra width fro 8 to 11. (18% of total cost) Widen fro 8 to 11 (LIPS 14) Construction cost (LIPS 28229) 1,188 @ 212 @ 32,24 262,794 295,34 FOR OHAUITI AREA 2,471,254 Developent Contributions Policy Page 1 229

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation 9. Welcoe Bay Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 9. WELCOME BAY 9.1 Welcoe Bay Rd (arterial) -.87k (LIPS 15) Existing foration: Varies fro 9 to 14.4 Proposed upgrade: To arterial standard, 16 carriageway, kerb, channels, footpaths a) Widen to 16, kerb, channel, footpath 87 9.2 Waikite Rd-1.58k (LIPS 2827) Existing foration: 5.2 seal, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 11, kerb, channel, footpath a) Widen to 11, kerb, channel, footpath 1,58 1,484 1,291,8 1,291,8 1,286,795 1,286,795 9.3 Waitaha Rd-1.71k (LIPS 17) Existing foration: First 24 is 12 seal, kerb and channel both sides, one footpath. Reainder is 6.5 seal, kerb & channel, one footpath Proposed upgrade: (a) 24-92, widen to 12, kerb, channel, footpath (b) 92-195, widen to 8, kerb, channel, footpath (a) Widen, kerb, channel, footpath (LIPS 2823) 1,18 (b) 118 to 175 525 453,94 359.625 813,529 TRANSPORTATION UPGRADE COST FOR WELCOME BAY AREA 3,391,44 Page 23 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 1. Papaoa 1. PAPAMOA 1.1 Girven Rd (arterial) -.78k See City-wide Transportation (BIF) Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 1.2 Maranui St-1.46k (LIPS 24) Existing foration: 1 or 1.5 wide, one section with kerb, channel and footpath one side, one section with no kerbing, one section with kerb only Proposed upgrade: (a) Widen -52 to 12. kerb, channel, footpath on one side (b) Widen 52-128 to 12, kerb, channel, footpath on both sides (c) Widen 128-146 to 12, kerb, channel, footpath on one side, footpath on other side (a) Widen, kerb, channel, footpath one side (LIPS 52 28231) (b) Widen, kerb, channel, footpath both sides (LIPS 94 24) 4.869 751.6 1 755,929 1.3 Papaoa Beach Rd - 8.52k (LIPS 2839) Existing foration: Varies fro 13 at western end to 5.5 at eastern end. Most of road has kerbing and channels, but footpaths varied Proposed upgrade: (a) 1.33k - 2.4k, widen fro 7.2 to 12, kerb, channel, footpaths both sides (b) 6.3k - 8.28k, widen fro 5.5 to 1, kerb, channel, footpaths both sides (c) 8.28k 8.52k, widen fro 5.5 to 8. kerb, channel, footpaths both sides (a) Widen, kerb, channel, footpaths 1,7 (b) Widen, kerb, channel, footpaths 98 (c) Widen, kerb, channel, footpaths 1,24 254.786 487.119 835.886 1,577,791 1.4 Doain Road (arterial) -.78k (LIPS 244) Existing foration: Varies fro 8.4 to 11.8 Proposed upgrade: Arterial standard with 16 carriageway, kerbing. footpath, etc (including land purchase) -325 2.158 Plus Renewals Plus Land purchase (LIPS 563) Eng Est 6.294, 1,397 6.394,397 1,15,2 7,499.597 99,921 8,49,518 1.5 Range Rd-.91k (LIPS 284) Existing foration: 5.5 wide seal, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen first 64 to 8, kerb, channel, footpath both sides. Reaining 27 unchanged Widen, kerb, channel, footpaths 64 24,174 24,174 Developent Contributions Policy Page 231

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 1.6 Logan Road -. 9k (LIPS 2841) Existing foration: 5.5 seal, no kerb, channel footpath Proposed upgrade; Widen to 8, kerb, channel, footpath both sides Widen, kerb, channel, footpaths 9 13,992 13,992 Note that projects 6.7-6.9 (Karewa Parade, Short Place, Taylor Rd) have been deleted as they were not SIF related. 1.7 Percy Rd -.75k (LIPS 2842) Existing foration: (a) -15, 5.6 wide, no kerb, channel, footpaths (b) 15-4, 7 wide, kerb, channel, footpath on one side (c) 4-75, 8 wide, kerb, channel, footpath on both sides Proposed upgrade: Widen first 4 to 8, kerb, channel, footpath on one or both sides, as required. (a) Widen to 8, kerb, channel, footpath both sides 15 4,781 (b) Widen to 8, kerb, channel, footpath other side 25 36,99 76,88 1.8 Stella Place -.9k (LIPS 2843) Existing foration: 5.6 wide, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 8, kerb, channel, footpath both sides Widen, kerb, channel, footpaths 9 23,5 23,5 1.9 Dickson Rd -.88k (LIPS 2844) Existing foration: 7 wide, kerb, channel, footpath on one side Proposed upgrade: Widen to 8 Widen 88 89,83 89,83 1.1 Grant Place-.11k (LIPS 2845) Existing foration: 5.8 wide, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 8, kerb, channel, footpath both sides Widen, kerb, channel, footpath both sides 11 33,763 33,763 1.11 McCallu Place-.11k (LIPS 2846) Existing foration: 5.8 wide, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade; Widen to 8, kerb, channel, footpath both sides Page 232 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation Widen, kerb, channel, footpath both sides Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 11 26,967 26,967 1.12 Parton Rd -.95k (LIPS 245) Existing foration: 5.8 wide, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: (a) Widen to 15, kerb, channel, footpaths (a) Widen to 15, kerb, channel, footpath (b) Plus Renewal coponent 95 Actual Cost 1,715,339 417,648 2,132,987 1.13 Sipson Rd -.97k (LIPS 2847) Existing foration: 5.9 wide, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 1, kerb, channel, footpath both sides Widen, kerb, channel, footpaths 97 243,571 243,571 1.14 Kirkpatrick Place-.1k (LIPS 2848) Existing foration: 5.9 wide, no kerb, channel, footpath Proposed upgrade: Widen to 8. kerb, channel, footpath both sides Widen, kerb, channel, footpaths 1 28,67 28,67 1.15 Paveent Widening Gravatt Road (LIPS 2831) Gravatt Rd (LIPS 257) 3.16 32 2,72 3,718,539 663,4 4,381,579 Grenada Street (LIPS 2832) Grenada St (LIPS 264) 1,5 1,65 @ 2,3 1.158,78 2,133,195 3,291,273 Doncaster Drive (LIPS 2833) Doncaster Dr (LIPS 265) 775 75 @ 929,791 497,89 1,427,6 Sandhurst Dr (a.) Grenada - Gravatt (includes land) (LIPS 258) Sandhurst Dr (b.) Gravatt - State Highway (includes land) (LIPS 26) Gloucester St (LIPS 252) Longview Dr (LIPS 2849) Shopping Centre to Wairakei Strea (LIPS 1169) 1,127,65 3,196,777 1.331,4 254,346 565, Developent Contributions Policy Page 233

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost Golden Sands Subdivision to Wairakei Strea (LIPS 285) Eerald Shores Subdivision to Wairakei Strea (LIPS 2851) 38, 315,1 = 16,27,725 1.16 Tara Rd - Construction (LIPS 246) Reconstruct as an Arterial Rd -15 Carriageway Reconstruct as an Arterial Rd -15 Carriageway,8 Eng Est 6,255,423 3,8,5 Tara Rd - Land Purchase (LIPS 564) Land Purchase - 146 x 1 Land Purchase - 62 x 5 Survey and Negotiation See file 6482-16 (Vol 19) for detail and cost sharing. Papaoa Share = 22% 2.92.62 ha ha 5, 327,3 1,882,431 1.17 Tara Rd / Doncaster Dr Roundabout (LIPS 248) Construct Roundabout Less 2% Ministry of Education share See file 6482-16 (Vol 19) for cost sharing. = 63, 126, 54, 1.18 Tara Rd / Parton Rd Roundabout (LIPS 249) Construct Roundabout Land Purchase (LIPS 28232) See file 6482-16 (Vol 19) for cost sharing. 1.1 L.S. Ha. @ 2,14345 929,748 3,7,93 1.19 Wairakei Strea Crossings Longview Dr (LIPS 2853) Pal Springs Boulevard (LIPS 267) Golden Sands Subdivision (LIPS 268) Eerald Shores subdivision (LIPS 269) 115 12 12 12 Actual Cost Eng Est Eng Est 3,746 291,983 415.92 761.358 449.52 1,918,781 1.2 Gravatt Rd - Evans Drain Crossing (LIPS 2852) Construct crossing over Evans Drain 2 37,456 1.21 Mangatawa Interchange SH2 -Sandhurst Link (LIPS 137) Construct interchange with Sandhurst Dr and S H 2 1 L.S. Eng Estiate 9,85, 1.22 Parton Rd/Papaoa Rd Roundabout (LIPS 2259) Construct roundabout 1 L.S. Eng Estiate 63, 1.23 Sandhurst Drive - Maranui Street Intersection Upgrade (LIPS 2355) Intersection upgrade Land Purchase.7 Contingency and Negotiation Eng Estiate 6, 17,391 113,43 73,434 TRANSPORTATION UPGRADE COST FOR PAPAMOA AREA 57,671,692 Page 234 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 11. Wairakei All of the Wairakei transportation projects in below are funded fro developent across the whole urban growth area except Ite 11.7 which is funded solely fro Catchent A. The boundaries of Catchent A (Area A) are shown in section 12. of Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Storwater for the boundary of Catchent A. In addition to this, the funding of soe Wairakei transportation projects is shared with the neighbouring Papaoa or Te Tuu urban growth areas. Quantity Unit Unit rate Est Cost 11.1 Te Okuroa Drive - Parton Rd to Wairakei Boundary (LIPS 226) a) Construction and land purchase 77 3,861 2,729,8 2,729,8 b) Te Okuroa Drive - Boundary to Main Road (LIPS 259) Land purchase to date (Papaoa Junction).7 Ha 867,588 Land Purchase 1.68 Ha 214,654 2,292,5 Road Construction 872 6,199 5,45,528 Road Construction 2,981 5,36 15,12,316 23,577,932 Te Okuroa Drive - Main Road to Te Tuu (LIPS 2261) Land Purchase 1.7 Ha 35, 595, Road Construction 35 6,41 2,114,35 2,79,35 d) Te Okuroa Drive - Boulevard Intersection (LIPS 2262) Road construction Estiate 2,, e) Te Okuroa Drive - Main Road Intersection (LIPS 2263) Extra over costs for intersection construction Estiate 818,6 818,6 Parton Road / Papaoa Roundabout (LIPS 2259) Construct Roundabout 11.2 Tara Road / Parton Road Roundabout (LIPS 249) Construct Roundabout Land Purchase (LIPS 28232) Total L.S. 63, 1 L.S..1 Ha 63, 63, 2,14,345 929,748 3,7,93 Developent Contributions Policy Page 235

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 11.3 Tara Road - Construction (LIPS 246) Quantity Unit Unit rate Est Cost Reconstruct as an Arterial Rd. (15 Carriageway) ) Reconstruct as an Arterial Rd. (15 Carriageway 28 Eng Estiate 6,255,423 3,8,5 = 1,55,428 Tara Road - Land Purchase (LIPS 564) Land Purchase - 146 x 1 (LIPS 564) Land Purchase - 62 x 5 (LIPS 564) 3..62 Ha Ha 5, 327,3 827,3 11.4 Tara Road / Doncaster Dr. Roundabout Wairakei Share is nil as this is not required for the Wairakei developent. 11.5 Wairakei Strea Crossings Pal Springs Boulevard (LIPS 267) Golden Sands Subdn. (LIPS 268) Eerald Shores Subdn. (LIPS 269) 12 Estiate 12 Estiate 12 Estiate 415,92 761,358 449,52 1,626,798 11.6 Papaoa East Interchange (LIPS 262) a) Stage 1 Land required to service Stage 2 Land required to service Stage 1 Overbridge and Raps Landscaping 2.5 4.29 1. 2. Ha Ha Ha Actual 35, Estiate 3, 2,557,484 1,51,5 21,292,194 6, 25,411,178 11.7 Access through Lot 5 DPS 82163 (LIPS 117) Construct 13 wide industrial access road to serve ultiple properties 4 4,423 1,769,2 Please note that ite 11.7 is funded solely fro developent in Catchent A. Refer section 12. of Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Storwater for the boundary of Catchent A (Area A). 11.8 Bus Bays and Shelters (LIPS 1171) Te Okuroa Dr. Estiate 1, 1, 11.9 Main Road (LIPS 261) Construct the Main Road between Te Okuroa Dr. and the Boulevard 3 Estiate 1,7, Page 236 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 11.1 Designations (LIPS 28277) Designations for Te Okuroa Dr and the ^^,^3, ^^^^ 35, Interchange Total Cost of Wairakei Roading (Exc Stage 2 share of Interchange) 577 ggo 382 Developent Contributions Policy Page 237

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation 12. Tauriko Business Estate Route K Extension (New arterial) Stage 1 of Route K extension is a shared cost with TCC, NZTA and Pyes Pa West Urban Growth Area. Priary Transport Network Fro Route K extension, a sub-arterial (Spine Rd) provides the priary transport network for this area. The Spine Rd includes intersections that will be controlled by large roundabouts. Additional road reserve width of 5 is provided to accoodate traffic functioning and landscape developent. A priary public transport network is provided along Spine Rd, with opportunities for secondary routes along collector roads if required. Provision for cycles and pedestrians include; Links to Pyes Pa West residential area. Crossing points separated fro roundabouts. Median refuges on Spine Rd. Off-road routes along storwater corridors. Local developent contribution funding is based on the additional cost over and above a 13 standard industrial collector road. Land for road widening fro 22 to 27 is included in the local developent contributions. An extension of the Kennedy Rd collector linking to Pyes Pa West will facilitate traffic oveent to the east. This includes a new bridge across the Kopurererua Strea. The full costs of land and construction are local developent contribution funded as this route is also planned as a bulk services corridor. Gargan Rd also requires upgrading to an industrial standard. Minor iproveents will be required to the intersections at Route K/SH29 and Belk Rd/SH29 as a result of the developent at Tauriko. Belk Rd also requires upgrading to industrial standards. Pedestrian Access Over Route K A portion of the two overbridges and one underpass required to provide access across Route K Extension are allocated to Tauriko Business Estate with the balance being funded by Pyes Pa West UGA. Belk Rd /SH29 Intersection Agreeent Suary Tauranga City Council has reached a funding agreeent with IMF New Zealand Liited regarding developent contributions for the Belk Rd/SH 29 Intersection. The Dataworks nuber for the funding agreeent is 1226653) and the funding agreeent is generally outlined below; A solution for the Belk Rd/SH29 Intersection has yet to be finalised. There is soe uncertainty regarding the final solution for this intersection. - NZTA is still assessing and negotiating options with IMF over options for a Tauriko bypass (indicated on the Structure Plan). Developent Contribution funding of the Belk Rd/SH29 intersection, has been based on cost estiates for a solution Transit have approved in principle. Page 238 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation Council's share ofthis cost estiate is the 6.2 illion and was included in the contribution schedules fro 27/28. The design proposal on which the 6.2 illion is based ay not reflect the final outcoe. SIFs will be payable in accordance with the 27/8 figures. If the intersection and/or the estiate (6.2) increases or decreases IMF will be either required to pay additional ipact fees or receive a refund on fees they have already paid. Developent Contributions Policy Page 239

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation NB: "EST COST" ROUNDED TO NEAREST 1 Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 12. TAURIKO BUSINESS ESTATE 12.1 Spine Rd, sub-arterial - 3672 (unfored) Construct to arterial standard, 12 carriageway and 19 carriageway, 3.6 edian, cycle lane and bus bays. 27 and 34 road reserve. a) Construct to 19 wide carriageway including first two roundabouts - 53 (LIPS 28233) Payent for extra cost above 13 industrial road Insert Base Industrial road cost per etre 53 31% 2,95 1,262,9 b) Construct 12 wide carriageway with Island 53-148 (LIPS 2894) Construct 12 carriageway (LIPS 7) Construct 12 carriageway (LIPS 7) Construct 12 carriageway (LIPS 7) Construct 12 wide carriageway with Island 148-3672 (LIPS 7) Payent for extra cost above 13 industrial road Insert base industrial road cost per etre 518 12 133 657 1,714 8% 1,731 86,363 21,429 39,516 1,234.49 1,731 2,966,935 6,916,633 12.1.1 1% SIFs (a) Extra over for roundabouts (LIPS 1173) (a) Extra over for roundabouts (LIPS 1173) Extra over for roundabouts (LIPS 1173) 137,145 13, 65, 455, 722,145 (b) Landark entry feature (LIPS 1) Landark entry feature (LIPS 1) (c) Bus bay and shelter (LIPS 71) 1 2 1 @ @ @ 1, 2, 72,28 2, 2, 472,28 (d) Land purchase splays for two roundabouts (LIPS 68).246 Ha 45,749 (d) Land purchase splays for one roundabout (LIPS 68).493 Ha 135,174 (d) Land purchase splays for one roundabout (LIPS 68).1267 Ha 145,686 (d) Land purchase splays for eight roundabouts (LIPS 68) 1.244 ha 1,43,415 (e) Land purchase - 22 to 27: 5 x 3262 (LIPS 68) 1.17 ha 1,394,953 (e) Land purchase - 22 to 27: 5 x 3262 (LIPS 68).2944 ha - 49,977 3,966,954 (e) Land purchase - 22 to 27: (LIPS 2895).795 Ha 5,223 (e) Land purchase - 22 to 27: (LIPS 2895).2554 Ha 141,333 (f) Land purchase - 22 to 34: Actual area for first 41 (LIPS 2895).488 ha 1,735,822 6,344,332 7,538,685 Page 24 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation NB: "EST COST" ROUNDED TO NEAREST 1 Qty Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 12.2 Kennedy Rd collector, link to SP13-37 (unfored) (a) Construct to 13 wide industrial carriageway (LIPS 73) (a) Construct to 13 wide industrial carriageway (LIPS 73) (b) Bridge over Kopurererua Strea incl design (LIPS 74) (c) Land purchase - 22 x 37 (LIPS 72) (Including price contingency and negotiation costs) (c) Land purchase - 22 x 54 (LIPS 72) (Including price contingency and negotiation costs) 265 15 1.36.7224 L.S ha ha @ @ @ 2,487 Actual 1,4, Actual Cost 23,694 659,55 183,53 1,4, 69,347 242,653 2,554,558 Cost sharing: 1% SIF for land and carriageway as key waterain corridor and transportation link with SPl 3 area NB:EST COST "ROUNDED TO NEAREST 1 QTY Unit Unit Rate Est Cost 12.3 Gargan Rd upgrade (LIPS 75 / 76) Costs identified for possible urbanisation of Gargan Plateau to ensure infrastructure options are covered. Existing foration: Rural standard, 5.8 seal, no kerb and channel or storwater Proposed upgrade: (a) Reconstruct to 13 wide Industrial standard (LIPS 76) 33 @ 2,796 (b) Road widening land purchase - 2 x 35 (LIPS 75).7 ha @ 922,68 64.158 986,838 12.4 Gargan Rd, Spine Rd intersection (LIPS 146) Reoved to reflect Environent Court decision per Tauriko Subission 28/9 12.5 Belk Rd upgrade (LIPS 1172) Existing Foration: Rural standard, 6.6 seal, no kerb and channel Proposed upgrade: (a) Construct to 13 wide industrial carriageway (b) New roundabout Belk/Spine intersection (c) Land purchase for roundabout splays 1.34 1.15 L.S ha @ @ (5) 2,148 63, 2,878,32 63, 6,57 3,568,377 12.6 Belk/SH 29 Intersection upgrade (LIPS 145) Upgrade intersection to approved standard in consultation with Transit New Zealand. Proposed Upgrade: (a) Land Purchase, Construction, SH29 realignent Note: 6.2 illion has been agreed between Transit New Zealand, IMF Ltd and TCC for a roundabout solution at the Belk Rd/S H 29 intersection. This is the final solution in ters of developent contributions outlined in the TCC/IMF agreeent suary at the beginning of the Tauriko Business Estate Transportation section. 6,2, 6,2, Developent Contributions Policy Page 241

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation 2.7 Accessways - Pedestrian and cycleway (LIPS 82) Land purchase for 9 wide accessways (a) Access A - 9 x 5 (a) Access A - 9 x 5 (b) Access C - 9 X 6 (c) Access D - 9 X 6 (walkway construction in storwater section) 313 137 54 54 6,63 34,6 13,564 12.97 121,17 12.8 Capital Contribution to Route K Southern Extension to Pyes Pa Rd SH 36 (LIPS 28264) Cost sharing for this new strategic arterial road has been agreed between Transit, TCC, WBOPDC and Grasshopper: Less Non-funded SIF portion Portion to be SIF funded (c) Pyes Pa West UGA cost - residential (d) Tauriko Business Estate 54,354, - 47,754, 6,6, 3,3, 3,3, Pyes Pa West Residential share = 3,3,/54,354, Tauriko Business Estate share = 3,3,/54,354, Note: Cobined SP 13 an SPl 4 share reduced by 1,1, (Transit-funded land purchase cost in bypass agreeent) 6.7% 6.7% 12.9 Route K Extension Iproveents (LIPS 27) This ite includes slip lane to Route K, slip lane to Route K extension/sh29 southbound, slip lane to Route K extension/sh29 northbound. Route K extensions widening, slip lane to Pyes Pa West, slip lane to Spine Rd, bridge iproveents to Pyes Pa West. Ites include contingencies and design as per Opus International Consultants Ltd review of estiate, July 26. L.S. Land Purchase Coercial Land Purchase Non-developable Land Purchase Non-developable.2 1.17.47 ha ha ha Survey and Negotiation on Land Purchase @ 2,6, @ 3,555,556 @ 4, @ 4, 7.5% 2,6, 71,111 46,8 18,8 2,736,711 1,253 2,746,964 12.1 Overpasses/Underpasses - Route K Ext Overbridge (LIPS 12) 3 wide x 2 plus 7 rap either end 663, 1,326, Underpass (LIPS 28324) 5 of 3 x 2.4 box culvert Cost sharing fro Pyes Pa West cost estiates: Tauriko Business Estate share 8.97% Actual Cost 75, 2,76, ROADING COST FOR TAURIKO BUSINESS ESTATE 36,9,226 Page 242 Developent Contributions Poiicy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE (LDC) LIPS 1 "^ 1 1 1 LDC FOR 1 NON I'S^HTR^I 1 1 GROWTH LDC/CDC ARpT/ct COST PROJECT ^^^n^r"^ """^^ '^^'^ "^ OR CDC COST HUEs PER cost) COS., 1 P-^«1 I I BETHLEHEM 142/28225 2829 1 2833 Cabridge Rd (Moffat intersection north) Cabridge Rd (Moffat intersection south) 1 Orange Lane 841,47 776,894 126,924 28 36 1 1 72 64 235,612 279,682 126,924 399 399 399 76.3 9.25 4.96 283 1 2832 1 2831 Moffat Road Road widening (Cabridge Rd) Road widening (Moffat Rd) 943,763 26,938 1,37,625 54 36 54 46 64 46 59,632 74,498 74,138 399 399 399 164.45 24.4 1 238.83 1 145/28273 2834 2834 1 163 Beauaris Boulevard Bethlehe Rd (S H 2/Carichael) - 47 Bethlehe Rd (S H 2/Carichael) - 23 Bethlehe Rd (Carichael/Marae) 3,567,38 54,624 167,647 842,855 86.48 37 86 1 34.5 13.52 63 14 31 34.5 3,85,7 186,711 144,176 29,785 399 399 399 399 995.54 6.25 46.52 93.83 1 2247 164 Bethlehe Road (Carichael/Marae) Bethlehe Rd (Marae for 61) 99,19 1,237,126 34.5 7.55 31. 15. 34.5 14.45 341,616 872,792 399 399 11.23 281.64 1 165 28263 Bethlehe Road (to the end - 15) Carichael Rd (Bethlehe Rd to end) 167,7 454,88 68.8 96 31.2 4 115,378 435,924 399 399 37.23 14.67 175 28274 1 2835 Mayfield Lane (Millers Road/SH2) Millers Rd (Bellevue Rd to end. - 39) Millers Rd (39-93) 31,279 767,456 615,785 92 63 33 8 37 67 28,777 483,497 23,29 399 399 399 9.29 156.2 65.57 177 28226 28258 Millers Road (extension to Mayfield Lane) Millers Rd (extension to Mayfield Lane) - Actual Intersection upgrade: Bethlehe/Carichael Wew Roads: 855,85 3,764 53,881 63 63 4 37 37 2 4 539,157 189,481 21,552 399 399 399 173.98 61.14 65.4 28278 Mayfield to Carichael. 815 665,54 44 56 292,838 399 94.49 1 227 1 229 Mayfield to Carichael. 23 Paveent widening: Walkways 238,931 219,58 1 57 43 238,931 124,863 399 399 77.1 4.29 2836 Mayfield subdivision access 431,8 18 82 77,724 399 25.8 2836 Mayfield subdivision access (land purchase) 1,85 1 1,85 399 3.5 Cost of Inflation 125,17 1 125,17 399 4.37 Cost of Capital BETHLEHEM LDC 845,438 17,89,917 1 845,438 1,8,361 399 272.81 3,485.15 1 PYES PA 28259 1 Cheyne Rd 1,911,268 94 6 1,796,592 1926 932.81 11672826-61 28227 44 Pyes Pa Road Pyes Pa Road collector to Cheyne Rd Pyes Pa Road collector to Cheyne Rd 3,412,538 771,161 24,687 34 18 1 66 82 1,16,263 138,89 24,687 1926 1926 1926 62.42 72.7 16.28 Cost of Inflation Cost of Capital 1 2,17 198,82 1 1 1 2,17 198,82 1926 1926 1.44 13.12 1 PYES PA LDC [ 6,518,563 1 3,519,26 1 1 1,827.24 1 Developent Contributions Policy Page 243

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE (LDC) NON '- '^ ^ ^ LDC FOR idctcv ER GROWTH LL)c/CUO AREA(g) "l^^ PROJECT P-IOJICT AREA '-^fj^ OR CDC cost HUEs ID COST (% of total Y, (% of 2837 2838 13/282 28 14/282 29 OHAUITI Poike Rd Hollister Lane Ohauiti Road Hollister Lane extension Cost of Inflation Cost of Capital OHAUITI LDC 734,178 375,223 1,66,819 295,34 19,66 219,912 2,71,826 P-J-' cost) pro ''' t ' '«' project cost) 7.82 1 29 18 1 1 29.18 71 82 519,945 375,223 39,378 53,16 19,66 219,912 1,497,223 137 137 137 137 137 137 1 COST PER UNIT 379.52 273.89 225.82 38.76 14.35 16.52 1,92.86 WELCOME BAY 15 2827 17/ 2823 Welcoe Bay Rd Waikite Rd Waitaha Rd Cost of Inflation Cost of Capital WELCOME BAY LDC 1,291,8 1,286,795 813,529 182,398 (312,637) 3,261,165 47 91 95 1 1 53 9 5 66,88 1,17,983 772,853 182,398 (312,637) 2,42,45 1429 1429 1429 1429 1429 424.64 819.44 54.83 127.64 (218.78) 1,693.77 PAPAMOA 24 28231 28239 244 563 284 2841 2842 2843 2844 2845 2846 245 2259 2847 2848 246 564 248 249 28232 2355 2852 Maranui St Maranui St - Actual Papaoa Beach Rd Doain Rd - Construction Doain Rd/ Land Purchase Range Rd Logan Rd Percy Rd Stella Place Dickson Rd Grant Place McCallu Place Parton Rd Parton Rd/Papaoa Rd Roundabout Sipson Rd Kirkpatrick Place Tara Rd (Construction) Tara Rd (Land) Tara Rd/Doncaster Dr roundabout Tara Rd / Parton Rd roundabout Tara Rd / Parton Rd roundabout Sandhurst Dr-Maranui St Intersection Upgrade Gravatt Rd Evans Drain Crossing Paveent Widening: 751,6 4,869 1,577,791 7,499,597 99,921 24,174 13,992 76,88 23,5 89,83 33,763 26,967 2,132,987 63, 243,571 28,67 1,55,428 827,3 63, 2,14,345 929,748 73,434 37,456 67 67 67 52.7 61 5 5 13 13 75 84 84 5.9 51.22 84 92 35.86 35.86 56.8 48.66 48.66 1 1 33 33 33 47.93 39 5 5 87 87 25 16 16 49.91 16 8 3 3 43.2 5 5 48. 78 34.14 34.14 46.34 46.34 53,21 3,262 1,57,12 3,95,4 555,52 12,87 6,996 9,994 2,997 66,812 28,361 22,652 1,68,413 322,686 24,6 25,822 3,65,876 296,563 357,84 1,41,492 452,415 73,434 37,456 66.89.43 14.52 519.8 73.78 15.96.93 1.33.4 8.88 3.77 3.1 142.2 42.89 27.2 3.43 479.31 39.42 47.57 138.44 6.14 97.9 4.98 252 2831 257 258 Gloucester Street Gravatt Road Gravatt Road Sandhurst Dr (a) 1,331,4 3,718,539 663,4 1,127,65 37 37 37 1 63 63 63 492,618 1,375,859 245,325 1,127,65 65.48 182.89 32.61 149.89 26 Sandhurst Drive (b) 3,196,777 1 3,196,777 424.98 Page 244 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE fldc) 1 1 1 1 LDC FOR 1 GROWTH 1 Z^ ID PROJECT PRO^IPT COST AREA (% of total 1 project 1 cost) 264/283/ i Grenada Street 3,291,273 265 2833 2849 1169 1 Doncaster Dr 1 Doncaster Drive 1 Longview Dr 1 Shopping Centre to Wairakei Strea 497,89 929,791 254,346 565, 285 Golden Sands subdivision to Wairakei Strea 38, 2851 1 Eerald Shores subdivision to Wairakei Strea 315,1 1 Wairakei Strea Crossings: 1 2853 267 1 Longview Dr Pal Springs Blvd Strea Crossing 291,983 415,92 268 269 137 Golden Sands Dr Strea Crossing r Eerald Shores Strea Crossing Sandhurst Dr. Interchange 761,358 449,52 9,85, Cost of Inflation 614,78 Cost of Capital (678,274) PAPAMOA LDC 57,68198 37 37 37 1 '^ 37 37 37 1 51.22 51.22 51.22 37 1 1 1 torj -"- total project cost) 1 63 63 63 85 63 63 63 63 COST HUES ~S;,r </ f ' «l P^'^f cost) 1,217,771 161.87 48.78 48.78 48.78 1 184,189 1 344,23 1 38,152 29,5 14,6 116,587 291,983 213,34 389,968 23,244 3,644,5 614,78 (678,274) 27,82,174 24.48 45.73 5.7 1 27.79 18.69 15.5 38.81 28.32 51.84 3.61 484.45 81.72 (9.16) 3,698.6 PYES PA WEST 1 45 56 1 59 28262 28326 1684 2378 2641 28325 1685 2379 63 28264 28324 2397 Road Upgrades/Widening: Pyes Pa Rd Kennedy Rd Hastings Rd New Roads: Lakes Boulevard Lakes Boulevard - Underpass South collector South collector Kennedy Road - South Collector Roundabout Kennedy Road Extension Kennedy Road Extension Land cost for connections Land cost for connections Route K Extension Underpass Over-bridge Noise wall Cost of Inflation Cost of Capital PYES PA WEST LDC *Total cost Route K Extension [ =54,354, 697,32 2,225,356 189, 428,4 437,597 1,894,41 1,59,24 63, 1,394,899 6, 85,2 534,312 6,6, 75, 1,326, 449,23 1,145,871 (1,36,58) 19,14,327 98.6 87.5 63.16 37 1 37 37 1 37 37 1 1 5 91.3 91.3 1 1 1 1.4 12.5 36.84 63 63 63 63 63 63 5 8.97 8.97 687,558 1,947,187 119,372 158,58 437,597 7,932 391,919 63, 516,113 222, 85,2 534,312 3,3, 682,725 1,27,58 449,23 1,145,871 (1,36,58) 11,99,72 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 264.34 748.63 45.89 6.94 168.24 269.49 15.68 242.21 198.43 85.35 32.76 25.43 1,268.74 262.49 464.7 172.71 44.55 (52.31) 4,578.67 WEST BETHLEHEM 23 163 235 New roundabout on S H 2 Bethlehe Rd (Carichael Rd northwards) Carichael Rd (Bethlehe Rd to SH2) 1 3,6,592 842,855 1,17,96 51 34.5 35 1 49 31. 65 34.5 1 1,836,32 29,785 356,286 616 616 616 2,981.1 472.5 578.39 1 Developent Contributions Policy Page 245

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation 2247 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE (LDC) ^O^ LDC FOR LDC FOR NON OTHER GROWTH LUUCUC AREA(S) Zn^ PROJECT P'S'IPT AREA '-^,"9 OR CDC cost HUEs ID COST (% of total Y ; {%of 28258 28275 Bethlehe Rd (Carichael Rd to Marae) Intersection Upgrade: Bethlehe/Carichael) Designation process for Roads in Bethlehe Plan Change 15 Cost of Inflation Cost of Capital SUB Less discount adopted by Council WEST BETHLEHEM LDC 99,19 53,881 2,113 194,317 3,669,33 1,821,211 1,821,211 P-J-' pros. ' '^'. ^ ^*> cost) P^ J«.f ' cost) 34.5 4 1 1 1 31 2 34.5 4 341,616 21,552 2,113 194,317 3,669,33 6,892,274 6,82,274 616 616 616 616 616 1 COST PER UNIT 554.57 327.2 3.43 315.45 5,956.66 11,188.76 (7,672.66) 3,516.1 WAIRAKEI 2261 2263 262 261 28277 2262 226 259 2259 28232 249 246 564 1171 267 268 269 Te Okuroa Drive -Main Rd to Te Tuu Te Okuroa Drive - Main Rd Intersection Bell Road Interchange (Stage 1) Main Road Designations Te Okuroa Drive - Boulevard Intersection Te Okuroa Drive - Parton Rd to Wairakei Boundary Te Okuroa Drive -Boundary to Main Rd Parton Rd / Papaoa Roundabout Tara Rd. / Parton Rd. Roundabout. Tara Rd. / Parton Rd. Roundabout. Tara Road Tara Road - Land Purchase Bus Bays and Shelters Wairakei Strea Crossings: Pal Springs Blvd Strea Crossing Golden Sands Dr Strea Crossing Eerald Shores Strea Crossing Cost of Inflation Cost of Capital 2,79,35 818,6 25,411,178 1,7, 35, 2,, 2,729,8 23,577,932 63, 929,748 2,14,345 1,55,428 827,3 1, 415,92 761,358 449,52 1,222,766 4,431,179 42.68 4.54 4.54 4.54 42.68 1 66.5 95 48.78 46.34 46.34 34.14 34.14 1 48.78 48.78 48.78 too 1 5 5 5 33.5 5 5 5 3 3 57.32 54.46 54.46 54.46 57.32 51.22 48.66 48.66 35.86 35.86 51.22 51.22 51.22 1,156,351 331,86 1,31,692 689,18 14,938 2,, 1,815,317 22,399,35 37,314 43,845 991,836 3,432,923 282,339 1, 22,886 371,39 219,276 1,222,766 4,431,179 335 335 335 335 335 335 335 335 53 53 53 53 53 335 53 53 53 335 335 3,451.79 99.63 3,751.32 2,57.25 44.59 5,97.15 5,418.86 66,862.79 61.96 856.55 1,971.84 6,824.9 561.31 298.51 43.35 738.35 435.94 3,515.72 13,227.4 Subtotal 89,945,127 59,71,127 172,5.64 Catchent A 117 Access through Lot 5 DPS 82163 1,769,2 Cost of Inflation 227,852 Cost of Capital 83,18 Subtotal 2,8,231 1 1 1 1,769,2 227,852 83,18 2,8,231 43 43 43 41,144.19 5,298.88 1,93441 48,3774.48 WAI RAKEI LDC 91,37,97 6,793,97 TAURIKO BUSINESS ESTATE Page 246 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Transportation TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE (LUC) 1 1 1 1 MON 1 LDC FORI 1 1 LDC FOR, nc7cdc O"^"^" GROWTH LIJUCOC ^REA(S) Z^^ ID PROJECT P-IO^IPT COST AREA (% of total ^ ^ ^ ^ 9 \Z, OR CDC (%of cost HUEsh S;''M UNIT P-J-» prost total 1 1 1 I '= ^*' cost) P'- '«=t I I <^ ^t) 1 I I 1 28233 Spine Road sub-arterial (- 148) 1,262,9 31 69 391,499 8277 47.3 2894 Spine Road sub-arterial (53-148) 86,363 8 92 68,829 8277 8.32 7 1 1173 1,71 68 72-74 75-76 1172 145 82 28264 27 12 28324 Spine Road sub-arterial (148-3672) Roundabouts Landark features and Bus Shelters Land purchase, Bus bays, Roundabouts Kennedy Road Collector Gargan Road Upgrade Belk Road Upgrade Belk Road/SH29 upgrade Accessways - Pedestrian & Cycleway 'Route K Extension Route K extension Iproveents Route K Overpasses Route K Underpasses Cosf of Inflation Cost of Capital 4,793,642 722,145 472,28 6,344,333 2,554,47 986,838 3,568,377 6,2, 121,17 6,6, 2,746,964 1,326, 75, 3,548,627 3,791,28 TAURIKO BUSINESS ESTATE LDC 46,648,773 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 8.97 8.97 1 1. 92 5. 91.3 91.3 383,491 722,145 472,28 6,344,333 2,554,47 986,838 3,568,377 6,2, 121,17 3,3, 2,746,964 118,942 67,275 3,548,267 3,791,28 35,386,155 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 8277 46.33 87.25 57.5 766.5 38.62 119.23 431.12 749.6 14.64 398.7 331.88 14.37 8.14 428.69 458.5 4,275.25 Developent Contributions Policy Page 247

Page 248 Developent Contributions Policy Schedule 1 - Part 4 - Local Infrastructure Transportation

Schedule 1, Part 4 Local Infrastructure - Reserves and Counity Infrastructure

Schedule 1 - Part 4 Local Infrastructure - Reserves and Connunity Infrastructure Contents 1. Introduction 25 2. Funding Needs Assessent - Section 11(3) of the LGA 22 25 2.1 Council Outcoes for Local Reserves and Counity Infrastructure 25 2.2 Distribution of benefits 251 2.3 Period in or over which benefits occur 251 2.4 Extent to which groups or individuals contribute to the need to undertake the activity 251 2.5 Costs and benefits of funding the activity distinctly fro other activities 251 2.6 Social, Econoic, Environental and Cultural Well-being 251 3. Key Considerations 251 4. Methodology 252 5. Calculations 252 6. Projects for other growth areas (to be taken as financial contributions) 252 7. Annual Review and Updating Frequency 253 8. Suary of Fees Schedule 254 Developent Contributions Policy Page 249

Local Infrastructure - Reserve and Counity Infrastructure 1. Introduction Reserve Contributions are collected for the purchase of land for neighbourhood reserves. Counity Infrastructure Contributions are collected for the developent of neighbourhood reserves. The Reserves and Counity Infrastructure Contributions for Neighbourhood Reserves apply to the following urban growth areas; West Bethlehe Pyes Pa West - Kennedy Road and Hastings Road (the land outside The Lakes developent) The Papaoa urban growth area in relation to resource consents granted in circustances where applications were ade between 1 July 24 and 3 June 29. The reserve requireent for these areas has been deterined by Council's Open Space Level of Service Policy and supported by the relevant structure plan and Plan Change inforation. The Policy outlines the open space level of service standards relating to the quality, function, quantity and accessibility of the open space network. This replaced the previous hectares of reserve land per 1 people standard. Reserve contributions for the purchase of open space and counity infrastructure contributions for the developent of open space in the Papaoa urban growth area will be taken as financial contributions under the Operative Tauranga City Plan rather than as developent contributions under this Policy. For convenience these level of service projects and contributions are shown in the suary of fees schedule at the end of this section even though they are not required as developent contributions. Reserve contributions for the purchase of neighbourhood reserves and counity infrastructure contributions for the developent of neighbourhood reserves are not required in The Lakes developent in Pyes Pa West, or in Wairakei as Council has (or intends to have) agreeents with the developers in these areas that they will provide and develop the reserve land instead of Council. As per Council's Open Space Level of Service Policy, contributions towards local reserves and the developent of local reserves are not required in areas outside the urban growth areas or in the Rural Residential, Rural Marae Counity, Urban Marae Counity and Ngati Kahu Papakainga zones within the urban growth areas. In addition, contributions towards local reserves and the developent of local reserves are not required on ultiple-owned Maori land within 5 etres ofthe Rural Marae Counity, Urban Marae Counity and Ngati Kahu Papakainga zones. 2. Funding Needs Assessent - Section 11(3) of the LGA 22 2.1 Council Outcoes for Local Reserves and Counity Infrastructure The provision of neighbourhood reserves within a growth area contributes to all of the Council Outcoes, and the following City Vision Stateents; Vibrant, Healthy and Diverse Counities A Great Place to Grow Up Built to Fit Our Hills Harbour and Coast Page 25 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1, Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Reserves and Counity Infrastructure Strong Sustainable Econoy Easy to Move Around The provision of neighbourhood reserves is also iportant in ipleenting Western Bay of Plenty's growth anageent strategy called SartGrowth. 2.2 Distribution of benefits The principal benefit of providing neighbourhood reserves is that they provide a focal point for local counities and space for a diverse range of leisure opportunities within a local area (within 4 or 5 etres of each property). The benefit of this activity is conferred on both new and existing households in the growth areas. Given the restricted geographic nature of these capital works Council believes that copleting, or not copleting these works will have little if any ipact at all on households and businesses in geographic areas beyond the individual growth areas. 2.3 Period in or over which benefits occur The capital projects included are designed to ensure that all households within the growth area are able to have access to neighbourhood reserves. Council has therefore assessed that the period over which the benefits will be received is the developent period of the greenfield area, fro when the growth area is first opened up until it is full (to the axiu allowed density). The divisor used in Council's calculations is the expected nuber of new lots over this period. 2.4 Extent to which groups or individuals contribute to the need to undertake the activity The group that creates the need for these works is residential growth (i.e. new households) in the specified growth areas. Developent contributions allocate the cost of these works to that growth counity. 2.5 Costs and benefits of funding the activity distinctly fro other activities Given the benefits and causation factors outlined above, it is considered appropriate (in particular for transparency and accountability reasons) for these works to be funded through this particular contribution, rather than the citywide developent contribution or other funding sources such as rates or a Unifor Annual General Charge. 2.6 Social, Econoic, Environental and Cultural Well-being The Council has considered the ipact, for all sectors of the counity, including the growth counity which pays developent contributions, of the proposed allocation of costs in ters of their social, econoic, environental and cultural well-being. It considers this allocation of costs to be fair and reasonable. The allocation details for this activity are clearly set out in this section. 3. Key Considerations Section 23(1) sets out the axiu contribution that ay be required for reserves. Reserve contributions ust not exceed the greater of 7.5 percent of the value of the additional allotents created by a subdivision or the value equivalent of 2^ of land for each additional household unit created by a developent. Schedule 13 of the Local Governent Act 22 outlines the ethodology for relating the cost of counity infrastructure to units of deand. Soe rounding has occurred in the calculations. This has generally been to the nearest hundred and applies to total value. Developent Contributions Policy Page 251

Schedule 1, Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Reserves and Counity Infrastructure Land values used to deterine revenue and expenditure are gst exclusive. 4. Methodology The ethodology for calculation of neighbourhood reserve requireents is based on applying the open space level of service standards (outlined in the Open Space Level of Service Policy) to each grov\/th area. The neighbourhood reserve requireents and the associated cost of this is then calculated as a total cost and divided by the nuber of household units projected to be accoodated within the relevant planning period for the relevant growth area. 5. Calculations Refer to Suary of Fees Schedule for allocation of total project cost to developent contributions and total cost per unit, including inflation and cost of capital. West Bethlehe Reserve Purchase Area Te Paeroa Reserve Catchent B (part of Parau Fars) LIPS 632 Size.3.234 Estiated cost Total Project Cost 1,836,677 13,5 1,94,177 Reserve Developent (Counity Infrastructure) Area Catchent A Catchent B (part of Parau Fars) LIPS 7 2296 Size.3.234 Estiated cost Estiated cost 168,75 58,5 227,25 Pyes Pa West - excludes The Lakes developent Reserve Purchase (LIPS 2181) Neighbourhood reserve 6 Walkways Neighbourhood reserve 13 3'' 1.2242 3^ Estiated cost Estiated cost Estiated cost 363,2 63,4 333,4 76, Reserve Developent (Counity Infrastructure) (LIPS 2183) Neighbourhood reserve 6 Walkway reserve Neighbourhood reserve 7 Neighbourhood reserve 13 (counity share) Estiated cost Estiated cost Estiated cost Estiated cost 122,4 122,4 13,5 75, 333,3 6. Projects for other growth areas (to be taken as financial contributions) Refer to Suary of Fees Schedule for total cost per unit, including inflation and cost of capital. Page 252 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1, Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Reserves and Counity Infrastructure Papaoa Urban Growth Area LIPS Project Total Project Cost Aount allocated to Financial Contributions 2211 Open Space Level of Service - Land Purchase 1,753,552 1,175,231 2586 Open Space Level of Service - Land Developent 412,4 412,4 Total 2,165,952 1,587,631 7. Annual Review and Updating Frequency Developent contributions for neighbourhood reserves and counity infrastructure shall be reviewed annually to take into account changes which ay affect these activities. The review will consider the following; Changes in the assuptions and inputs Land value changes deterined by a registered valuer Incorporation of the actual cost of copleted capital projects Changes to the estiated costs of capital projects The inclusion of new capital projects New inforation on the factors used in calculating the developent contribution. Developent Contributions Policy Page 253

Schedule 1, Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Reserves and Counity Infrastructure 8. Suary of Fees Schedule Service: Reserve Land Purchase UGA: West Bethlehe Project ID Project Nae Project Total DC o/o Cost HUE'S Cost Per Unit 632 Neighbourhood Reserve Land Purchase - West Bethlehe Urban Growth Area 1,836,677 54 991,86 42 2,361.44 289 Catchent B (part of Parau Fars) 13,5 9 93,15 42 221.79 UGA Sub-Total 1,94,177 1,84,956 2,583.23 Cost of Capital 3,924.13 Cost of Inflation 34.82 Reduction adopted by Council (2,5.28) UGA Total 1,94,177 1,84,956 4,536.9 UGA: Pyes Pa West Project ID Project Nae Project Total DC»/o Cost HUE'S Cost Per Unit 2181 Pyes Pa West (Kennedy Rd/Hastings Rd) Reserve Land Purchase 76, 1 76, 882 861.68 UGA Sub-Total 76, 76, 861.68 Cost of Capital (244.39) Cost of Inflation 294.5 UGA Total 911.79 Service: Counity Infrastructure UGA: West Bethlehe Project ID Project Nae Project Total DC o/o Cost HUE'S Cost Per Unit 2296 7 West Bethlehe neighbourhood reserve (Catchent B - part of Parau Fars developent) Neighbourhood Reserve Developent - West Bethlehe Growth Area 58,5 168,75 9 9 52,65 151,875 42 42 125.36 361.6 Page 254 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1, Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Reserves and Counity Infrastructure UGA Sub-Total 227,25 24,525 486.96 Cost of Capital 336.93 Cost of Inflation 11.1 1 Reduction adopted by Council (18.36) UGA Total 51,15 42,75 816.64 UGA: Pyes Pa West Project ID Project Nae Project Total DC o/o Cost HUE'S Cost Per Unit 2183 Pyes Pa West (Kennedy Rd/Hastings Rd) Reserve Land Developent 333,3 1 333,3 882 377.89 UGA Sub-Total 333,3 333,3 377.89 Cost of Capital (76.94) Cost of Inflation 129.15 UGA Total 333,3 333,3 43.1 Developent Contributions Policy Page 255

Schedule 1, Part 4 - Local Infrastructure - Reserves and Counity Infrastructure Financial Contributions: Service: RESERVES (LAND PURCHASE) UGA: Papaoa Project Nae Project Total DC o/o Cost HUE'S Cost Per Unit 2211 Open Space Level of Service Land Purchase 1,753,552 67.2 1,175,231 2464 476.96 UGA Sub-Total 1,753,552 1,175,231 476.96 Cost of Inflation 8.33 Cost of Capital (2.64) UGA Total 536.65 Service: RESERVES AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE UGA: Papaoa Project ID Project Nae Project Total DC o/o Cost HUE'S Cost Per Unit 2586 Open Space Level of Service Developent 412,4 1. 412,4 2464 167.37 UGA Sub-Total 412,4 412,4 167.37 Cost of Inflation 41.17 Cost of Capital (38.28) UGA Total 17.26 Page 256 Developent Contributions Policy

Schedule 1, Part 4 Local Infrastructure - Maps and Structure Plans

Schedule 1 - Part 4 Local Infrastructure - Maps and Structure Plans Contents structure Plans 258 Urban Growth Area Maps: Tauranga City - Urban Growth Areas Urban Growth Area Boundaries - Bethlehe & West Bethlehe Urban Growth Area Boundaries - Tauriko, Pyes Pa West, Pyes Pa, Ohauiti & Welcoe Bay Urban Growth Area Boundaries - Papaoa & Wairakei Urban Growth Area Structure Plans: Bethlehenn North - Structure Plan 1 Bethlehe Triangle - Structure Plan 2 Bethlehe West - Structure Plan 3 Bethlehe South - Structure Plan 4 Pyes Pa- Structure Plan 5 Ohauiti - Structure Plan 6 Welcoe Bay - Structure Plan 7 Papaoa-Maranui St - Structure Plan 8 Papaoa-Doain Rd - Structure Plan 9 Papaoa-Parton Rd - Structure Plan 1 Papaoa-Marjorie Lane - Structure Plan 11 Carichael West (West Bethlehe) - Structure Plan 12 Pyes Pa West - Structure Plan 13 Tauriko Business Estate - Structure Plan 14 Wairakei - Structure Plan 15 Urban Growth Area Catchent Maps Wairakei - Areas A, B & C Developent Contributions Policy Page 257

Maps and Structure Plans structure Plans Structure Plans have been prepared for specific urban growth areas within Tauranga City. The purpose of these Structure Plans is two-fold: 1. To guide subdivision and developent generally within an urban growth area so that there is a consistency between the land-use and subdivision pattern that will evolve and Council's planning objectives and policies for that area - as outlined in the Tauranga City Plan. 2. To provide a clear illustration of the bulk services infrastructure needed to support urbanisation of the urban growth area including the projects to be funded by developent contributions for local infrastructure. The details of these projects are set out in detail in Schedule 1 - Part 4 for the various services. Structure Plans are reviewed annually, along with the various service's projects, and will be aended as required fro that review process. These aendents would be undertaken as part of the aendents to the LTCCP, as required by the Local Governent Act 22. Page 258 Developent Contributions Policy

tu o s. 8 i o i 1! 1 I l i X 9i I I Approx. Scale 1:76,469 (at A3) 387.5 775 2.325 3,1 Tauratt' Developent And Financial Contribution Urban Growth Areas - Tauranga City Council - Inforation shown on this plan is indicative only The Council accepts no liability for its accuracy and il is your responsibility lo ensure that the data contained herein is appropriale and applicable to the end use intended

i I \ «I /^ i THIS IS NOT THE DISTRICT P Not To Scale Cadastral Infonnation sourced fro Land Inforation New Zealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED N Urban Growth Area Location (West Tauranga) - Tauranga City Council - Urban Growth Area UGA on Other Sheet

Produced by inforation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga City Council THIS IS NOT THE DISTRICT PLAN! Taurait^a Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation New Zealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED V ^ ^ E Not To Scale Urban Growth Area Location (South Tauranga) Urban Growth Area UGA on Other Sheet ( / D ir:wilhmvsie«i

Produced by Infoiation Manageent - Copyriglit Tauranga City Council P:\TCC Project.LnvironcntaliMicy ni.stiictinanre\ie\v UrbanGrinvth.UibaiiCiiowlh.l.id- 16, 3/21 («2;26:44 p.. f^'-^. THIS IS NOT THE DISTRICT PLAN! Taunt iti^a ' Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation New Zealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED IN Not To Scale Urban Growth Area Location Papaoa Urban Growth Area y 7 UGAon Other Sheet.a

Produced In- Infoiation Maiiagenie - Cop\ right Tauraiiga Citv rouncil SPl_Norlli EasLBetlilelieni nixd - 27/2e(Kl«di 13 31 IXl Section 8 SPl nr STORMWATER CATCHMENT BDV ' ^ ^ " SEWER RISING MAIN f^ ^-- SEWER -. «. SEWER PUMPSTATION Q RS STORMVWTER " " i ^ V\ATER SEWER CATCHMENT BDY.. - ROAD IMPROVEMENT WORK REQUIRED PROPOSED ROADS WALKWAYS RETENTION PONDS LOCALAUTHORITY BOUNDARY PROPOSED ZONES/RESERVES (NEW) LOCAUNEIGHBOURHOOD RESERVE CATCHMENT TrtMrviHijwf vr,' REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation f-jew Zealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Not To Scale Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Bethlehe North East i\ E3> ;4V^ SPl

Produced by Inforation Manageent - Copvriglil Tauranga ('it> Council SP2_Bctlilelieni_Tn.TiiElc nixd - 27/l)2/2(Kl«iS 16 22:3 Section 8 SPl KEY; SAMTARYSEWEII STORW.VHTEH TOTHWMN STRI.MAIHtC»7:HMEHraDV CATCHKonauY GREHioaTaoy ROJID tsi^rov^uehrvnirx RiOEISD yio YEAR to KiCif KEM» CHA.SKa 1 FOOTJAn- I n I I nnuwdevaoflshtahea I 1 ktlghbolrhooo RESEIWE arcieht BDY Tnurartftnlft)' REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation NewZealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Not To Scale Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Bethlehe Triangle IM 4- B. SP2

Produced by Inforniation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga Cily Councii SP3_Belhleheni_Wesl xd - 27/2/2(1X.* 1633:53 Section 8 SPS AREA1^-^.1ha DV/ELLING LNrrS EXISTING 2 FUTURE 5 ULTIWRTE STOfiilWATER CATCHklENT SW.UNE SW. OPEN DRAIN RESERVE CATCHMEffl" DDY IMENT BOUNDARV PEDESTRIAN WAIXWAV ^aviaod: 72JZ1 Tiinniii<^aO!y REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation NewZealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Not To Scale Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Bethlehe West Plans N S o SPS

Produced by Inforation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga City Council SP4 Belhlelieni Soulh \d - 27/()2/2» «. 16 3X18 Section 8 SP4 AREA13-2D2hj DWELLING UNITS EXISTMG 7 FUTURE 25 ULTIMATE 32 AREA14-4.3ha OWELLINC UNITS EXISTING 2 FUTURE S ULTI(.«Tc AREAI7-43,ha ovueiling UNrrs EXIST IN 13 FUTURE ULTIMATE NON RESID. AHHA lozfia AREAB- 4a,Eto DWELLING UNrrs EXISTUG «FUTURE 11 ULTIMATE NON RESID. AR A 37.5Jia STORMWATER ICATCHMENT SW. LINE SW. OPEN DRAIN RESERVE CATCHMENT BDY CATCH ME KT BOUNDARY PEDESTHIAN WALKWAY AREAf)-13e.4lui DWELLING UNn-S EXISTING FUTURE ULTIMATE 16 2 ISO 1 ^^ v POAD WIDENING CATCHMEf>jrBDlES 'I'niirnn^nC'fy REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation New Zealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Not To Scale Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Bethlehe South Plans IN SP4

Produced by Inforation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga City Council SPS Pves Panixd-27/2/28(a) 16:55:37 Section 8 SPS STOHMMTEB CATCHMENT BDY SAARY SEWERTOBIlllG U).IT CATCHMENT ' GREaiOELtBOr ROADIMFROVEM.KTWORXREQUSED PBflPOSED HJ6UC ACCESSWAYWAUOVAY YEAR 1 KEra s ana. i FOOTPATH NEBHDIJURHOOD RESERVE CATCW<E}IT BOY Tauriin^itCkv REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation NewZealand CRO\ COPYRIGHT RESERVED Not To Scale Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Pyes Pa IN ' -^, SPS

Produced by Infonnation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga City Council SP6_hauiti.xd - 27/2/28 («) 17: 17 Section 8 SP6 STORMWATER CATCHUEMT BOY SASTTAHY SEWEMTAt LLING U>itT WTMJtVT BDY CREEHEaTlDY ROU) MPRDVBIEKT OTBK REOtJREO PROPOSED FU5UC ACCESS'JVAYWAIKWA* YEAR 1 KERB t CHAwa i footpath NElGiaOURHOOO RESERVE CATCH«E1(T BOY TauransfnC REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation NewZealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Not To Scale Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Ohauiti. ^ E c / r-t3 J. SP6

Produced by Infonnation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga Cily Council SP7_Welcoe_Bay,xd - 27/2/28 (t^ 17:11:14 Section 8 SP7 SrORJlWATER CA1C161ENT BUY SANITARYSEWEriVElilMGUSIT CATCHMENT BDY GBELraElTBOY ROAD \»r^it.>bn WORK REOUHED PRDFOSEU PuauC ACCESSWAY/flAUtiVAY YEAR to KEBB i a. i FOOTPATH K3GKEOUaHOD RESERVE CMWlBn BDY I RlaitaagOg] Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Welcoe Bay

Produced by Infoiniation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga City Council SP8_Papaiiioa_Maranui Slreel iiixd - 27/2/28 @ 17:12:31 Section 8 SPS OA AREA '^' SEfWCEDAREA UNSERVICEDAKEA DV.'EaWG UNITS DaG SERVICED FUTURE UNSERVICED UVAT^ 2e,4h3 17.31a aihj -19-1 29 PRcroSEDS^WAHYSEWEH FHCPOSEIIStOialWATEn StOFLVIWATEB CATCrtJENT BDY ROAO OJFROVEMEMT lf.ork REQUIRED YIB K4C4F EXISTING PIM> STATION KOTOSEDFIWPSTATIOM YEAH III KERB» CHAWB.» FOOIPAIH e O O O e e SAJIITARYSEVlrERCATClftlENTBOY KEGHBOUHHOCO RESERVE atomehtedy AMENDMENTS oq AREA 34,ha ' ^ Di'/EU.WGUS -43 325 ija 97 TOTAIARHA ' ' SERVICED AREA UNSEfWlCEDAREA '^LLING UNITS EXTG SERVICED - HAZARD ZONE - ^COXIIIFIU. EXTGUNSERVICED FUTURE UNSERVICED ULTIfMTE 4471a 23.5ha 2.7113 124 5 119 69-84 - 141 OQ TOTAI AREA ^ " LESS DRAINAGE RES. DV/ELLING UNITS EXISTl.NG FUTURE -635 ULTIMATE BS5 BB.4ho 4.ttl3 62.3ha ^t^ylaad: 22W2QCB Taurangn'. REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation NewZealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Papaoa - Maranui Street SP8

Produced by Infotation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga City Council SP<)_Papanioa_Doaiii_Road xd-27/2/28 i3l 17,1'):44 Section 8 SP9 P9i=OSEDSAWrARYEE»EB FBOFOSEDSTOWiHATES STOflUWATER CATDWLII BOY DOSTl'IG PIMP STATION PROPOSED FU)J> STATION YIO TEAJ! 1 laclf EKalCHAStJELi FOOTPATH bdl bai till ROAD luprovubittoekheoured CATCHUENTEDY NE1CH3UHHD RESRVE CATCIMENt BOV 'litiiranifiic REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation NewZealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Papaoa - Doain Road

Produced by Inforation Manageent - Copyright Tauranga City Council SPIO_Papaiiioa_Parlon_Road.xd - 28/2/28 (Sl 7:56:52 Section 8 SPIO IC ASa 11.441a '^ DWRUNE UNITS EXISTING 13 + BOSlNFIIi 61 UWTE 164 IC AREA 16.27113 OV<ELtJNG UNITS EXISTING UUIf.'ATE IW PRCP3ED SANITARY SFiVSl PnCPOSEOSTORlMAISl STOafNATBCATCHMEKTBDY YU KICIF EXEUNG PUMPSTATION PROPOSH) PUMP STATION YEARtO KERB 1 CHANNEL 1 FOOTPATH la Ml BUT Ra»D «PROVEMEKTWOSKREOlJ!RE > CATTJlllEHrBOY s^sa^^^g KHGHXUSHOOQ RESERVE CATCMJEIT BDY 9 TOTAIAHEA ISBSia DV-tLLING UNITS EXISTING»6%INFia DEVELOPMENT ULTIMATE 154 32 19 265 Rflvtocd: 2 TaiiranAfii. REVISED: 22/2/28 Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation NewZealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Tauranga District Plan - Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Papaoa - Parton Road

Produced by Inforniation Manageent - Copyright 'fauranga City Council SPl l_papaoa_marjorie,xd 28/2/28 ig 8:18 2 Section 8 SPll 8 AREA 22.Eh3 DV^LUNG UdiTS EXISTING - HAZARD ZE ecaisfia IITIMATE -2*2 51 191 114 3 6 PROPOSED SAh'ITARYSBffiT FRCFOSEOSTOaiMAira STOT.(AATERCATITOENraOY v n i- RQADK?aCVEWENTV(OH<REQlliRtD O YIO XACIF EXISDICPlWPSTATlOa PROPOEED PIMP STATION YEAR 1 KERB t CHAN.SEL t FOOTPATH > B e e e SANDAAYSEWI CATCHMENT 3DY FRCrOSED FUBUCACCESSiYAY lielghbcushooa RESERVE CATCW.E.NTBOY AMENDMENTS AREA tajsha D\-ffiUJ,'J3 UMTS EXISTIHG ULTIMATE -22 1 AREA 1.9113 DV/iNG UNITS EXlSn.lG 59 -HAZARD ZONE 14 es tbohin.=tl 51 ULTIMATE 15 Tuurtinti^it. Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation NewZealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Tauranga District Plan Urban Growth Area Structure Plans Papaoa - Marjorie Lane -^5

IJIIB.H.B!MlilMtii.ll=kUMI=t.UHJJJclM aas n.aiuif n:? < o o a. to3 1 \ d^ \ ^ C7 Q) o o (D ) CO? Q) O 5" ^ z) 2. i o ^ o S Bl?J o CD I/) ' S^ 5 C3 CU O o o c :3 o O I-Ic (D -D > 3 1 CD W I-I- CX3 (D rl- 3- (D 3- (D 3,,1 s CO TJ ND 73 < co' CD Q. go o N S 't s-?^ - O o o c a S o "> 5 -* 5 c cn c 1 a z o CO FTI H cn O > ^ 2 Fn > CO TJ Fn CO FH I T CO H O o 7] CO 7] < Fn z TTl I CD O 73 I O o 33 fti CO Fn 33 < TTl CD J. uu O c Zl X n O u 33 III CO Fn 7) < :D XI ^ fo /V i-\ P^\ V\.i Vs/J z Fn ^ CO 3 s ^ ^ Fn 33 13 O z D *,*,' *^ ' Z CO H o 33 S? 5 X) TJ T] * «# \» z Fn i 33 S > z ll^ z Fn S 1 CO H Fn ^ in Fn 3) T3 C CO o * **,' * ' z Fn 1 H FH > 5 33 2 > 2 N S, / y \ \ z Fn 1 CB H Fn? ^ 33 33 CO z o > -H -r X) rn 5.fc ~H CO ^? 3J O C z 3 o c H Z Fn > 33 Fn CO o CO o c z o I CO c 13 Tl Fn D 33 O > D > o CO CO 33 Fn CO H 33 O o z 33 O > D 1 13 33 i 2 Fn z -i \ >^ >. z? 3J O > ^ 1^ 2- ^ O ai 2 rh c^ 5 (D (Q (D 3 Q. o a o o ^^ 2 " ( I c- CAJ

Mi Pi BDAi); SECTION 8 SPn YIELD CATCWEHT SOUNDARY STORMWATER CATCHMENT BOUNDARY STORMWATER SEWER CATCHMENT BOUNDARY SANITARY SEWER SEWER RISING MAIN WATER MAIN FUTURE LOCAL ROAD LOCAL ROAO COLLECTOR ROAO NETWORK ARTERIAL ROAD = ^ = ^ = = ^ ^ = = PUBLIC WALKWAY/CYCLEWAY ^ M ROAD IMPROVEMENT WORK REDUKED 'f^'l,'lslj^'jiii':^', KlC o 1** IMPROVEMENT - COST FOR DEVELOPER KERB t CHANNEL t FOOTPATH HEVH n/nnt

nuluccii liv IjifoiniiUion Manaycincril - Copyiighl riiurangii tily Council Section 8 SPl4 KEY: ////// T T T i 1 1 Kscatpeni liiduslrial ss Proposed Sanitary Sewer RM Proposed Sanitary Seuer Rising Main Proposed Watennain Roaci Proposed Storwater I'jpe :.--^^^^ [*»%** o Coercial L'nsuiiable for Buildg Platfor Greenbeh -J- 4- -^ Storwater Caichern g ^ y y g y y ^ l-nrc Road^ (De\eloper Funded) I I H H I K"^^ Iproveent Work Required (SIF Funded) C * ^ * ) Storwater Detention Pond O PS Propu.scd W astcwaier Pup Stalion ] -Q Proposed Outlet Spillway Reieniion Pond C 1 I Roads;- Taurikurj Drive shall be eonsiructed to ero.ss section Tl.l.i All other interna! roads shall be constructed lo eross-scciion T134 1 I 1 V r I I industrial Business Zonc;36.8ha \ \»? /2OO SSRM ^15SS R^^djobi^cd Intersection lyiie & locjition yet to-- be resolved i >o,. /liliinn Cross (SeeiionTLVl] SH29 i2sr //V ' "i 5{>^; CabridgeRo^ -WhSagll^ 'Industrial Business Zone: >).2ha.-".' o,, Industrial Busines: Zone: 29.ha Industrial Business Zone: 11.8ha Indusirial Business Zone:2,71ha 1 I I 1 T -1 e.1 PouSUSSl-, Indusirial Business Zone; 29.7hi Industrial Business Zone: 2l.4ha n ]^-^-i-4- ^?% sj L l ^ ^ WU ^^ k4( I industrial Business 1 1 I txislinp Ease" "' industrial Business Zone; 4.1ia ^Ph Cross ITI.IJ V -,:t7(ini r I t 1 1 T \ogoss_ 25 Water Industrial Business Zone: 11.2ha hidusirial Business Zone: 13.42ha flf\*t*. "^ * R:elenIioi lelenlion Pond B1 * : *J Retention P«nd A (Pond 12C-SP13) INol in SlF'sl ri 1111111 IIT 1 * **?'-.s r: ;"*~ -,^nverted Siphon Twin Pipes ss Connection to Xopurererua Bridge' Pup Slalion Coercial Busine.<JS ] Zone: 11...ilia Reieniion (SP13)-( csl,-' 1\S?- T Industrial Bu.siness Zone: 25..Iha 3 Waiei- \' Unboosled Walennan \\ w ^Bridee \ (Kennedy tu Taurikura D ' Kennedy Road Connection 25 Boosted \\\ ' Water Al'^^'. Reieniion Pond Jll (NotinSlF'sl M.^^ Tauran<^aCity Cadastral Inforaiion sourced fro Land Inforation New Zealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Tauranga District Plan - Not To Scale Urban Growth Area Structure Plan.j.^^^^^^ gusiness Estate 2U1- SPM

Produced by Infonnation Manageeni Copynghl Tauranga Cily Council WairakciSlRicturePtanFrac.xd- l7/8/2ioc<^; 1:26:4 a.. Section 8 SPl5 proposed Sanitary Sc^vc^ -~ Proposed Sanitary Sewer Rising Main Proposed Waterain Proposed Sionnwaier Pipe Slorwaler Calchenl Wairalcet Strea Storwater Catchents Stonnwaler Catchents for Ponds G and I Slorwaler Swale _ WVHBBVra I I Future Roads (Developer Funded) Road Iprovee Work Required (SIF Funded) Slorwaler Deteion Pond Q PS Proposed Waslewaler Pup Slalion ^ Q Proposed Outlet Spillway ( j Waslewaler Pup Station C aichcnl Boundaries Storwater Detention Ponds Pond Area Required 2.1 Ha 6.2Ha 8.3Ha Taurait^iCity Cadastral Inforation sourced fro Land Inforation New Zealand CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Tauranga District Plan Wairakei

W: o DQ ( CO < I ( < JZ UOiltaanM.C c n SX ) IS CD S * L CX)NSULTANIS LTD itvit«u-i I I t» Wairakei Storwater and SIF Areas III I I I i