Minta Farm Berwick S96A Transport Impact Assessment

Similar documents
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Traffic and Transport Assessment

Minta Farm Precinct Structure Plan

STATEMENT TO PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA BY WILLIAM DE WAARD, TRAFFIC ENGINEER

Classification Criteria

Berwick Health and Education Precinct: Casey Amendment C207 (Part 1) Submission to Planning Panels Victoria

Liveable Neighbourhoods Design Code and Policy

BROMPTON LODGE, CRANBOURNE PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT WOLFDENE PTY LTD PREPARED FOR

Transit boulevard: A new road type for Sydney s Growth Centres

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Strategy for Walking & Cycling Action Plan

Traffic Engineering Assessment. Additional Traffic Modelling at Minta Farm PSP 11. Prepared for Victorian Planning Authority

Daleston Masterplan Traffic & Transport Assessment

10 SHERFORD Town Code

4.1 Introduction. 4.2 Aspects of walkable communities

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

PLAN 20 PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

Barwon Heads Road, Armstrong Creek Traffic Impact Assessment Prepared for: Newland Developers Pty Ltd

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

TGSI Tactile Ground Surface Indicators

TRANSPORT AND MOVEMENT

Ormond & McKinnon Walks Response to Draft Glen Eira Community Plan

Part B Design Guidance / Principles _

Proposed Residential & Retail Development at Geelong Rd Portarlington

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

Having held a public hearing, that Council approve:

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2012

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

Appendix 12 Parking on footways and verges

IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) A: Class 2 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways. Pedestrian and Cycle Ways:

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

St Germain Special Activity Precinct 1425 Pound Road & 2100 Thompsons Road Clyde North Transport Impact Assessment

Frome Street Bicycle Route

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

DRAFT for a State Policy for Healthy Spaces and Places

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

13M /09/13. St Germain Special Activity Precinct 1425 Pound Road & 2100 Thompsons Road Clyde North Transport Impact Assessment.

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

CURRENT ORIGINAL REFERENCE SECTIONS. (Typical Section) (Typical Section) The Parade Island Bay : Concept Option Summary Sheets.

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINE NO. 13

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) Building Frontages: A: Stair Applications. Geometry (Accessed from the Sidewalk) Refer to A:

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

APPENDIX E Needs Assessment

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

SLOUGH Stage 3 Road Safety Audit of A4 London Road, M4 J5 to Sutton Lane

RAA Submission to: The City of Adelaide Draft Integrated Movement Strategy Moving Adelaide

IAN WHITE ASSOCIATES. Crawley Station Gateway Public Realm

Manukau City Council Plan Change 20 - Flatbush Stage 2. Integrated Transport Assessment (ITA)

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Frascati Road and Temple Hill Route Improvements. Outline Design Report to Accompany Public consultation

PennDOT Access Management Model Ordinances Training

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Traffic Modelling and Intersection Analysis

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

El Centro Mobility Hub

Ministry of Education Flat Bush School Notice of Requirement. Integrated Transportation Assessment Report. February 2016

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

TS 109 DURHAM ROAD QTC PHASE 4 PROJECT PROPOSAL. Page 1

Public Consultation on Braintree Integrated Transport Package (ITP) HAVE YOUR. Consultation open from 24 September to 5 November 2018 SAY

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

The Safe System Approach

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

5. MODIFICATIONS AT JEANNE D ARC BOULEVARD/REGIONAL ROAD 174 INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION - PUBLIC HEARING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

Living Streets Policy

Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Highway Infrastructure Manager

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

SC6.17 Planning scheme policy for the transport and parking code

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

FAQ s Walsh Road / Ferguson Road Pilot Scheme

Rhebogue Neighbourhood Greenway. Road Safety Audit Stage 2

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines


Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Transcription:

Minta Farm Berwick S96A Transport Impact Assessment 170310TIA001I-F 4 October 2017

onemilegrid ABN: 79 168 115 679 (03) 9939 8250 1/59 Keele Street COLLINGWOOD, VIC 3066 www.onemilegrid.com.au DOCUMENT INFORMATION Prepared for Stockland Minta Farm File Name 170310TIA001I-F Report Date 4 October 2017 Prepared by David Ballock Reviewed by Valentine Gnanakone Signature Signature One Mile Grid Pty Ltd. This document has been prepared by onemilegrid for the sole use and benefit of the client as per the terms of engagement. It may not be modified or altered, copied, reproduced, sold or transferred in whole or in part in any format to any person other than by agreement. onemilegrid does not assume responsibility or liability to any third party arising out of use or misuse of this document. Page 2

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 5 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 2.1 Site Location... 5 2.2 Planning Zones... 6 2.3 Road Network... 7 2.4 SmartRoads Road User Hierarchy Maps... 8 3 MINTA FARM PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN (PSP)... 9 3.1 General... 9 3.2 Future Urban Structure... 9 4 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL... 11 4.1 General... 11 4.2 Access and Internal Road Network... 12 4.3 Soldiers Road... 17 4.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Network... 18 5 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION DESIGN... 19 5.1 Casey Planning Scheme Requirements... 19 5.1.1 Clause 56.06-2, Walking and cycling network objectives... 19 5.1.2 Clause 56.06-3, Public transport network objectives... 19 5.1.3 Clause 56.06-4, Neighbourhood street network objective... 20 5.1.4 Clause 56.06-5, Walking and cycling detail network objectives... 21 5.1.5 Clause 56.06-6, Public transport network detail objectives... 22 5.1.6 Clause 56.06-7, Neighbourhood street network detail objective... 22 5.1.7 Clause 56.06-8, Lot access objective... 24 6 TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS... 25 6.1 Overview... 25 6.2 Traffic Capacity... 25 6.3 Traffic Generation... 25 6.4 Traffic Distribution... 25 6.5 Traffic Impact... 26 7 CONCLUSIONS... 27 Page 3

TABLES Table 1 Road Cross Sections... 14 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location... 5 Figure 2 Planning Scheme Zones... 6 Figure 3 Soldiers Road, looking south from the subject sites frontage... 7 Figure 4 SmartRoads Road User Hierarchy Map... 8 Figure 5 Locality Plan... 9 Figure 6 Draft Future Urban Structure Plan... 10 Figure 7 Proposed Subdivision Layout... 11 Figure 8 Proposed Roundabout Connection... 12 Figure 9 Internal Road Network Layout... 13 Figure 10 Road Cross Section Connector Street (Entrance Boulevard 31m)... 15 Figure 11 Road Cross Section Connector Street (31m)... 16 Figure 12 Road Cross Section Local Access Street Level 1 (16m)... 17 Figure 13 Soldiers Road Cross Section... 17 Figure 14 Pedestrian and Bicycle Network... 18 Page 4

1 INTRODUCTION onemilegrid has been requested by Stockland Minta Farm to undertake a Transport Impact Assessment of the proposed residential subdivision development at Soldiers Road, Berwick. A Section 96A application is being lodged for the subdivision of land located on the north side of Soldiers Road in Berwick as the Precinct Structure Plan for the development area is not yet completed. As part of this assessment the subject site has been inspected with due consideration of the development proposal, traffic data has been sourced and relevant background reports have been reviewed. 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Site Location The subject site is located on the north-eastern side of Soldiers Road between Chase Boulevard and Grices Road in Berwick, as shown in Figure 1. The application area is part of a larger parcel of land as shown in Figure 1 (indicated by the blue-dashed line), earmarked to be developed as a residential subdivision at later stages of the sites overall masterplan. The site is an irregularly shaped parcel of land, comprising an area of approximately 12.32ha and is currently vacant, generally consisting of grassland. Figure 1 Site Location Masterplan Area Subject Site Copyright Melway Publishing Land use in the vicinity of the site is largely rural in nature to the east and the south, whilst being largely residential to the west and south. Page 5

2.2 Planning Zones It is shown in Figure 2 that the site is located within an Urban Growth Zone (UGZ), for which the permitted uses are listed in Clause 35.07 and Clause 37.07 of the Casey Planning Scheme. Figure 2 Planning Scheme Zones Masterplan Area Subject Site Page 6

2.3 Road Network Soldiers Road is a local road running north from Thompsons Road in Clyde North to Adamson Road in Beaconsfield, where it continues as Kenilworth Avenue. In the vicinity of the site, Soldiers Road provides a single traffic lane in each direction with kerbside parallel parking lane on the southwest side only. Auxiliary turn lanes are provided at side roads to facilitate access. A photograph of Soldiers Road at the frontage of the site is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 Soldiers Road, looking south from the subject sites frontage A 60km/h speed limit applies to Soldiers Road in the vicinity of the site. Page 7

2.4 SmartRoads Road User Hierarchy Maps In mid-2011 VicRoads developed the SmartRoads Road User Hierarchy Maps which aim to manage competing interests for limited road space by giving priority use of the road to different transport modes at particular times of the day. The SmartRoads map, reproduced in Figure 4, identifies the priority modes on each arterial road in the vicinity of the site, and indicates that Soldiers Road north of the site is a Future Bus Priority Route. Furthermore, Grices Road is noted as a Future Bus Priority Route. Figure 4 SmartRoads Road User Hierarchy Map Subject Site Page 8

3 MINTA FARM PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN (PSP) 3.1 General The site is located within the western portion of the Minta Farm PSP area, for which the City of Casey and State Government agencies, are currently preparing a Precinct Structure Plan (PSP) to facilitate the future development of the area. The Minta Farm Precinct has a total land area of approximately 286 hectares of land within the City of Casey and is around 45 kilometres south east of Melbourne s Central Business District. While the plan is still in development, at this stage it is anticipated to deliver approximately 3,000 dwellings and an employment precinct that supports approximately 10,000 jobs. Additionally, the plan is anticipated to deliver a key north south arterial road in the form of a boulevard which is to be an extension of Bells Road (to the south). It is anticipated that this road will ultimately connect into the Beaconsfield Interchange. The location of the PSP area and the subject site in the context of the surrounding area is provided in in Figure 5. Figure 5 Locality Plan Minta Farm PSP Area 96A Application 3.2 Future Urban Structure A draft of the future urban structure for the PSP area has been prepared by the VPA for the site which illustrates the general location of roads, land uses and other relevant elements of the PSP area. An extract of the urban structure is provided in Figure 6. As shown in the Future Urban Structure Plan, relevant to the application area and overall master plan, a Connector Street network is proposed from Soldiers Road linking through to the east and north with the future Bells Road arterial running north to south. Page 9

Figure 6 Draft Future Urban Structure Plan 96A Application Area Page 10

4 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 4.1 General The application seeks to develop the subject site as part of the Minta Farm PSP for the purposes of a residential subdivision, comprising of approximately 231 standard residential lots (average lot size approximately 383m 2 ), passive open space and a road connection to Soldiers Road. The development is to be staged as follows: Stage 1 123 lots, middle portion of site; Stage 2 41 lots, southeast portion of site; Stage 3 51 lots, northwest portion of site; and Stage 4 16 lots, middle portion of site. A view of the proposed site layout is shown in Figure 7 below. Figure 7 Proposed Subdivision Layout Page 11

Hazelnut Boulevard Connector Street 4.2 Access and Internal Road Network Access to the site is proposed to Soldiers Road approximately midway along the frontage forming a cross intersection with Hazelnut Boulevard to the south. As part of the development the existing T- intersection and associated turn lanes will be converted to a roundabout allowing fully direction movements in all directions. A VPA standard roundabout design as shown in Figure 8 below, reflecting a conceptual view of the proposed roundabout connection to Soldiers Road. Figure 8 Proposed Roundabout Connection Subject Site Subject Site Soldiers Road Pedestrian Crossing Across Soldiers Road Pedestrian Crossing Across Soldiers Road The Soldiers Road connection will comprise of a modified Connector Street 31 metre wide cross section to form a Boulevard in lieu of the standard Connector Street 25 metre wide cross section within the draft urban structure. From a traffic point of view there is no material difference between the two with the only change being the introduction of increased nature strip widths on both sides of the Connector Street. Additionally, the Connector Boulevard entry from Soldiers Road will be provided with a central median with a 6 metre width up until passing the first Local Access Street running perpendicular to the Connector Street. Within the site, the internal road network has been designed with standard Access Streets with 16 metre cross sections linking to the Connector Street network. A view of the proposed internal road network and road hierarchy of development is shown in Figure 9 and summarised in Table 1. Additionally, a view of the proposed cross sections is provided in Figure 10 to Figure 12. Speed control measures will be required to be implemented along roads exceeding 240m in length. It is recommended that threshold treatments be proposed at the location of T-intersections of such roads as an effective means of speed control. Pedestrian crossing opportunities will be available at the proposed roundabout at Hazelnut Boulevard and at Wurundjeri Boulevard through to the tree reserve (informal). Page 12

Figure 9 Internal Road Network Layout Connector Boulevard (31m) Connector Street (31m) Local Access Street A (16m) Laneway (8m) Site Access Pedestrian Crossing Opportunity Page 13

Table 1 Connector Street (Boulevard) Road Cross Sections Reservation Road Pavement Parking Footpath Bike Path Notes 31m 2 x 3.5m traffic lanes Connector Street 31m 2 x 3.5m traffic lanes Access Street 16m 7.3m pavement 2 x 2.1m kerbside indented bays 2 x 2.1m kerbside indented bays Intermittent onroad 2 x 1.5m footpath each side 2 x 1.5m footpath each side 2 x 1.5m footpath each side 3.0m off road path 3.0m off road path On-road - 6 metre wide median Widened nature strips It is considered that each of the above treatments provide the required traffic function when carrying traffic, and the required pedestrian and cycle function to cater for both cyclists and pedestrians. At road crossings, it is recommended that appropriate treatments are provided to ensure that priority is established as required. Page 14

Figure 10 Road Cross Section Connector Street (Entrance Boulevard 31m) Page 15

Figure 11 Road Cross Section Connector Street (31m) Page 16

Figure 12 Road Cross Section Local Access Street Level 1 (16m) 4.3 Soldiers Road As part of the development, Soldiers Road will be upgraded to provide for a parallel parking lane on the northeast side of the existing pavement effectively mirroring the southern arrangement. As a result, Soldiers Road will operate with a single traffic lane and a parallel parking lane in each direction as shown in Figure 13. Figure 13 Soldiers Road Cross Section Page 17

4.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Network The proposed road network includes footpaths on both sides of all roads. The proposed access streets are designed to form a low speed and low traffic volume network, which can comfortably accommodate bicycle movements on-road within their cross-sections. In addition, the Connector Street includes a designated two-way bicycle path. The pedestrian and bicycle network is shown in Figure 14. Figure 14 Pedestrian and Bicycle Network Two-Way Off-Road Bicycle Path Pedestrian Footpath Page 18

5 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION DESIGN 5.1 Casey Planning Scheme Requirements Clause 56.06 identifies Access and Mobility Management requirements for residential subdivisions such as that proposed at the site. The following Clauses are applicable. 5.1.1 Clause 56.06-2, Walking and cycling network objectives Standard C15 The walking and cycling network should be designed to: Implement any relevant regional and local walking and cycling strategy, plan or policy for the area set out in this scheme. Link to any existing pedestrian and cycling networks. Provide safe walkable distances to activity centres, community facilities, public transport stops and public open spaces. Provide an interconnected and continuous network of safe, efficient and convenient footpaths, shared paths, cycle paths and cycle lanes based primarily on the network of arterial roads, neighbourhood streets and regional public open spaces. Provide direct cycling routes for regional journeys to major activity centres, community facilities, public transport and other regional activities and for regional recreational cycling. Ensure safe street and road crossings including the provision of traffic controls where required. Provide an appropriate level of priority for pedestrians and cyclists. Have natural surveillance along streets and from abutting dwellings and be designed for personal safety and security particularly at night. Be accessible to people with disabilities. The road network within the proposed subdivision is suitably designed to cater for and encourage both pedestrian and cyclist trips within and through the area. The internal road network has footpaths on both sides of each streets, and provision of a two-way off-road bicycle path along the Connector Street bisecting the site. Internal roads are expected to have minimal traffic volumes and low speeds, and are considered suitable for cyclists. All roads and paths are provided with natural surveillance. The proposed rear access laneways are short, with side abuttals to adjacent lots, enabling appropriate surveillance. It is therefore considered that the subdivision satisfies the objectives of Clause 56.06-2. 5.1.2 Clause 56.06-3, Public transport network objectives Standard C16 The public transport network should be designed to: Implement any relevant public transport strategy, plan or policy for the area set out in this scheme. Connect new public transport routes to existing and proposed routes to the satisfaction of the relevant public transport authority. Page 19

Provide for public transport links between activity centres and other locations that attract people using the Principal Public Transport Network in Metropolitan Melbourne and the regional public transport network outside Metropolitan Melbourne. Locate regional bus routes principally on arterial roads and locate local bus services principally on connector streets to provide: Safe and direct movement between activity centres without complicated turning manoeuvres. Direct travel between neighbourhoods and neighbourhood activity centres. A short and safe walk to a public transport stop from most dwellings. The proposed Connector Street bisecting the middle portion of the site running generally northwestsoutheast of the proposed development is designed to accommodate future public transport routes, ensuring that the entire development is situated within close proximity to public transport. Additionally, a potential bus route along Soldiers Road is proposed north of the site. It is therefore considered that the subdivision satisfies the objectives of Clause 56.06-3. 5.1.3 Clause 56.06-4, Neighbourhood street network objective Standard C17 The neighbourhood street network must: Take account of the existing mobility network of arterial roads, neighbourhood streets, cycle paths, cycle paths, footpaths and public transport routes. Provide clear physical distinctions between arterial roads and neighbourhood street types. Comply with the Roads Corporation s arterial road access management policies. Provide an appropriate speed environment and movement priority for the safe and easy movement of pedestrians and cyclists and for accessing public transport. Provide safe and efficient access to activity centres for commercial and freight vehicles. Provide safe and efficient access to all lots for service and emergency vehicles. Provide safe movement for all vehicles. Incorporate any necessary traffic control measures and traffic management infrastructure. The neighbourhood street network should be designed to: Implement any relevant transport strategy, plan or policy for the area set out in this scheme. Include arterial roads at intervals of approximately 1.6 kilometres that have adequate reservation widths to accommodate long term movement demand. Include connector streets approximately halfway between arterial roads and provide adequate reservation widths to accommodate long term movement demand. Ensure connector streets align between neighbourhoods for direct and efficient movement of pedestrians, cyclists, public transport and other motor vehicles. Provide an interconnected and continuous network of streets within and between neighbourhoods for use by pedestrians, cyclists, public transport and other vehicles. Provide an appropriate level of local traffic dispersal. Indicate the appropriate street type. Provide a speed environment that is appropriate to the street type. Provide a street environment that appropriately manages movement demand (volume, type and mix of pedestrians, cyclists, public transport and other motor vehicles). Encourage appropriate and safe pedestrian, cyclist and driver behaviour. Page 20

Provide safe sharing of access lanes and access places by pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles. Minimise the provision of culs-de-sac. Provide for service and emergency vehicles to safely turn at the end of a dead-end street. Facilitate solar orientation of lots. Facilitate the provision of the walking and cycling network, integrated water management systems, utilities and planting of trees. Contribute to the area s character and identity. Take account of any identified significant features. It is considered that the layout proposed and the cross section of internal roads is appropriate to promote safe and easy movement through the subdivision for all road users. Furthermore, the proposed road network will provide adequate clearances to cater for the access requirements of service and emergency vehicles (e.g. typically up to an 8.8m truck). The forecast daily traffic volumes for the internal subdivision roads will be well within the recommended volume limits specified in Table C1 of Clause 56.06. To ensure speeds are controlled, street lengths are limited, and where longer streets are required, speed control devices are proposed to limit vehicle speeds. It is therefore considered that the subdivision generally satisfies the objectives of Clause 56.06-4. 5.1.4 Clause 56.06-5, Walking and cycling detail network objectives Standard C18 Footpaths, shared paths, cycle paths and cycle lanes should be designed to: Be part of a comprehensive design of the road or street reservation. Be continuous and connect. Provide for public transport stops, street crossings for pedestrians and cyclists and kerb crossovers for access to lots. Accommodate projected user volumes and mix. Meet the requirements of Table C1. Provide pavement edge, kerb, channel and crossover details that support safe travel for pedestrians, footpath bound vehicles and cyclists, perform required drainage functions and are structurally sound. Provide appropriate signage. Be constructed to allow access to lots without damage to the footpath or shared path surfaces. Be constructed with a durable, non-skid surface. Be of a quality and durability to ensure: Safe passage for pedestrians, cyclists, footpath bound vehicles and vehicles. Discharge of urban run-off. Preservation of all-weather access. Maintenance of a reasonable, comfortable riding quality. A minimum 20 year life span. Be accessible to people with disabilities and include tactile ground surface indicators, audible signals and kerb ramps required for the movement of people with disabilities. The proposed road network and footpath provision provide continuous pedestrian connectivity and are to be designed appropriately to meet drainage, durability and access requirements. No cycle paths are to be provided on the local access streets as carriageways will be designed as a shared zone. Page 21

The two-way off-road bicycle path provided along the Connector Street throughout the site will provide north-to-south permeability for cyclists throughout the site. Otherwise, cyclists will be accommodated on-street, where street lengths and speed control devices will ensure that vehicle speeds are limited It is therefore considered that the subdivision satisfies the objectives of Clause 56.06-5. 5.1.5 Clause 56.06-6, Public transport network detail objectives Standard C19 Bus priority measures must be provided along arterial roads forming part of the existing or proposed Principal Public Transport Network in Metropolitan Melbourne and the regional public transport network outside Metropolitan Melbourne to the requirements of the relevant roads authority. Road alignment and geometry along bus routes should provide for the efficient, unimpeded movement of buses and the safety and comfort of passengers. The design of public transport stops should not impede the movement of pedestrians. Bus and tram stops should have: Surveillance from streets and adjacent lots. Safe street crossing conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. Safe pedestrian crossings on arterial roads and at schools including the provision of traffic controls as required by the roads authority. Continuous hard pavement from the footpath to the kerb. Sufficient lighting and paved, sheltered waiting areas for forecast user volume at neighbourhood centres, schools and other locations with expected high patronage. Appropriate signage. The proposed Connector Street bisecting the middle portion of the site and Soldiers Road north of the site, have been designed to cater for a public transport route,, therefore the requirements of Clause 56.06-6 do not apply. 5.1.6 Clause 56.06-7, Neighbourhood street network detail objective Standard C20 The design of streets and roads should: Meet the requirements of Table C1. Where the widths of access lanes, access places, and access streets do not comply with the requirements of Table C1, the requirements of the relevant fire authority and roads authority must be met. Provide street blocks that are generally between 120 metres and 240 metres in length and generally between 60 metres to 120 metres in width to facilitate pedestrian movement and control traffic speed. Have verges of sufficient width to accommodate footpaths, shared paths, cycle paths, integrated water management, street tree planting, lighting and utility needs. Have street geometry appropriate to the street type and function, the physical land characteristics and achieve a safe environment for all users. Provide a low-speed environment while allowing all road users to proceed without unreasonable inconvenience or delay. Provide a safe environment for all street users applying speed control measures where appropriate. Page 22

Ensure intersection layouts clearly indicate the travel path and priority of movement for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles. Provide a minimum 5 metre by 5 metre corner splay at junctions with arterial roads and a minimum 3 metre by 3 metre corner splay at other junctions unless site conditions justify a variation to achieve safe sight lines across corners. Ensure streets are of sufficient strength to: Enable the carriage of vehicles. Avoid damage by construction vehicles and equipment. Ensure street pavements are of sufficient quality and durability for the: Safe passage of pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles. Discharge of urban run-off. Preservation of all-weather access and maintenance of a reasonable, comfortable riding quality. Ensure carriageways of planned arterial roads are designed to the requirements of the relevant road authority. Ensure carriageways of neighbourhood streets are designed for a minimum 20 year life span. Provide pavement edges, kerbs, channel and crossover details designed to: Perform the required integrated water management functions. Delineate the edge of the carriageway for all street users. Provide efficient and comfortable access to abutting lots at appropriate locations. Contribute to streetscape design. Provide for the safe and efficient collection of waste and recycling materials from lots. Be accessible to people with disabilities. Meet the requirements of Table C1. Where the widths of access lanes, access places, and access streets do not comply with the requirements of Table C1, the requirements of the relevant fire authority and roads authority must be met. Where the widths of connector streets do not comply with the requirements of Table C1, the requirements of the relevant public transport authority must be met. A street detail plan should be prepared that shows, as appropriate: The street hierarchy and typical cross-sections for all street types. Location of carriageway pavement, parking, bus stops, kerbs, crossovers, footpaths, tactile surface indicators, cycle paths and speed control and traffic management devices. Water sensitive urban design features. Location and species of proposed street trees and other vegetation. Location of existing vegetation to be retained and proposed treatment to ensure its health. Any relevant details for the design and location of street furniture, lighting, seats, bus stops, telephone boxes and mailboxes. Road cross-sections are generally in accordance with Table C1 of the Planning Scheme, as discussed in Section 4. It is therefore considered that the subdivision satisfies the objectives of Clause 56.06-7. Page 23

5.1.7 Clause 56.06-8, Lot access objective Standard C21 Vehicle access to lots abutting arterial roads should be provided from service roads, side or rear access lanes, access places or access streets where appropriate and in accordance with the access management requirements of the relevant roads authority. Vehicle access to lots of 300 square metres or less in area and lots with a frontage of 7.5 metres or less should be provided via rear or side access lanes, places or streets. The design and construction of a crossover should meet the requirements of the relevant road authority. Generally, all internal single dwelling lots will have direct access onto the proposed internal road network via conventional crossovers. Rear-access lanes are provided to a number of lots fronting the Connector Street entrance from Soldiers Road to the site, due to the lots having less than 10.5 metres minimum frontage width and 300m 2 in size. It is therefore considered that the subdivision satisfies the objectives of Clause 56.06-8. Page 24

6 TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS 6.1 Overview The traffic generated by the proposed development has been assessed by various traffic reports prepared on behalf of the VPA by other consultants to model the impact of development of the PSP area and surrounding areas on the road network. These reports have assessed the existing road network as well as provided direction on the future road network, including intersections, arterial road connections, and road cross sections. In light of the above, the traffic generated by the development has already been assessed and considered acceptable. Notwithstanding, to provide a robust assessment the development s traffic impact has been assessed as follows. 6.2 Traffic Capacity Connector Streets have an indicative road capacity up to 7,000 vehicles per day. Soldiers Road is considered to be a Connector Street standard and as such it would have a capacity for up to 7,000 vehicles per day. Review on-site indicates that the section of Soldiers Road along the frontage of the site is currently carrying 2,000 vehicles per day. 6.3 Traffic Generation It is generally accepted that single dwellings on a lot in outer suburban areas may generate traffic at up to 10 vehicles per day, whilst in areas with good public transport, and for higher density dwellings, lower traffic generation rates are often recorded. Considering the size of the lots proposed and the proximity of the site to public transport, it is anticipated that the proposed development may initially generate up to 9 vehicle trips per day per lot. Application of the above traffic generation rates to the proposed 231 lot development is expected to initially generate up to approximately 2,079 vehicle trips per day, and approximately 208 vehicle trips per hour during both the AM and PM peak. 6.4 Traffic Distribution The first stages of development subject to this application will utilise the single connection to Soldiers Road. As development continues to the northeast further connections will be available to the surrounding road network and in particular the future Bells Road arterial and other Connect Street connections. Given the subject site is expected to be developed prior to any additionally external connections being provided, it is projected that all of the 2,079 daily traffic movements will be distributed to Soldiers Road via the proposed Connector Street connection. Of that traffic, it will be assumed that 70% is distributed to the northwest and 30% to the southeast based on likely destinations and attractions. Page 25

6.5 Traffic Impact Based on the projected distribution of traffic, it is projected that 1,455 vehicle movements will be generated to the northwest and 624 movements to the southeast per day. This level of additional traffic is well within the capacity of Soldiers Road and is expected to be easily assimilated by the existing and proposed road network. With regard to the proposed roundabout at the Connector Street intersection with Soldiers Road and Hazelnut Boulevard, as previously shown in Figure 8, it is expected that the peak hour generation of 208 vehicle movements per hour can be suitably accommodated and again is well within the capacity of such a roundabout with sufficient capacity to accommodate further traffic as required. Considering the above analysis, it is expected that the existing and proposed local street network will have sufficient capacity to accommodate the interim stages of development until such time that additional road connections are provided by further developments to the north and east. Page 26

7 CONCLUSIONS It is proposed to develop the subject site for the purposes of a 231 lot residential subdivision. Considering the analysis presented above, it is concluded that: The design of the proposed subdivision generally accords with the requirements of the Casey Planning Scheme, VPA Subdivision Design Standards; The proposed internal road network and connections to Soldiers Road are expected to be suitable to accommodate the proposed development traffic generation. Page 27